Microprecipitation method for preparing submicron suspensions

Abstract
The present invention provides a method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process including the steps of (i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, (ii) mixing the solution with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension; and (iii) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of 400 nm to 2 microns.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




The present invention is concerned with the formation of small particles of organic compounds by precipitating the organic compounds in an aqueous medium to form a pre-suspension followed by adding energy to stabilize a coating of the particle or to alter the lattice structure of the particle. The process is preferably used to prepare a suspension of a poorly water-soluble, pharmaceutically active compound suitable for parenteral administration.




2. Background Art




There is an ever increasing number of pharmaceutical drugs being formulated that are poorly soluble or insoluble in aqueous solutions. Such drugs provide challenges to delivering them in an injectable form such as through parenteral administration. Drugs that are insoluble in water can have significant benefits when formulated as a stable suspension of sub-micron particles. Accurate control of particle size is essential for safe and efficacious use of these formulations. Particles must be less than seven microns in diameter to safely pass through capillaries without causing emboli (Allen et al., 1987; Davis and Taube, 1978; Schroeder et al., 1978; Yokel et al., 1981).




One approach to delivering an insoluble drug is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,745,785. This patent discloses a method for preparing crystals of penicillin G suitable for parenteral administration. The method includes the step of recrystallizing the penicillin G from a formamide solution by adding water to reduce the solubility of the penicillin G. The '785 Patent further provides that the penicillin G particles can be coated with wetting agents such as lecithin, or emulsifiers, surface-active and defoaming agents, or partial higher fatty acid esters of sorbitan or polyoxyalkyklene derivatives thereof, or aryl alkyl polyether alcohols or salts thereof. The '785 patent further discloses micronizing the penicillin G with an air blast under pressure to form crystals ranging from about 5 to 20 microns.




Another approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,528 which discloses a process for preparing nanoparticles. The process includes the steps of: (1) preparing a liquid phase of a substance in a solvent or a mixture of solvents to which may be added one or more surfactants, (2) preparing a second liquid phase of a non-solvent or a mixture of non-solvents, the non-solvent is miscible with the solvent or mixture of solvents for the substance, (3) adding together the solutions of (1) and (2) with stirring; and (4) removing of unwanted solvents to produce a colloidal suspension of nanoparticles. The '528 Patent discloses that it produces particles of the substance smaller than 500 nm without the supply of energy. In particular the '528 Patent states that it is undesirable to use high energy equipment such as sonicators and homogenizers.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,826,689 discloses a method for making uniformly sized particles from water-insoluble drugs or other organic compounds. First, a suitable solid organic compound is dissolved in an organic solvent, and the solution can be diluted with a non-solvent. Then, an aqueous precipitating liquid is infused, precipitating non-aggregated particles with substantially uniform mean diameter. The particles are then separated from the organic solvent. Depending on the organic compound and the desired particle size, the parameters of temperature, ratio of non-solvent to organic solvent, infusion rate, stir rate, and volume can be varied according to the invention. The '689 Patent discloses this process forms a drug in a metastable state which is thermodynamically unstable and which eventually converts to a more stable crystalline state. The '689 Patent discloses trapping the drug in a metastable state in which the free energy lies between that of the starting drug solution and the stable crystalline form. The '689 Patent discloses utilizing crystallization inhibitors (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidinone) and surface-active agents (e.g., poly(oxyethylene)-co-oxypropylene) to render the precipitate stable enough to be isolated by centrifugation, membrane filtration or reverse osmosis.




In U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,091,188; 5,091,187 and 4,725,442 which disclose (a) either coating small drug particles with natural or synthetic phospholipids or (b) dissolving the drug in a suitable lipophilic carrier and forming an emulsion stabilized with natural or semisynthetic phospholipids. One of the disadvantages of these approaches is they rely on the quality of the raw material of the drug and do not disclose steps of changing the morphology of the raw material to render the material in a friable, more easily processed form.




Another approach to providing insoluble drugs for parenteral delivery is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,145,684. The '684 Patent discloses the wet milling of an insoluble drug in the presence of a surface modifier to provide a drug particle having an average effective particle size of less than 400 nm. The '684 Patent discloses the surface modifier is adsorbed on the surface of the drug particle in an amount sufficient to prevent agglomeration into larger particles.




Yet another attempt to provide insoluble drugs for parenteral delivery is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,922,355. The '355 Patent discloses providing submicron sized particles of insoluble drugs using a combination of surface modifiers and a phospholipid followed by particle size reduction using techniques such as sonication, homogenization, milling, microfluidization, precipitation or recrystallization. There is no disclosure in the '355 Patent of changing process conditions to make crystals in a more friable form.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,062 discloses a method of preparing small particles of insoluble drugs by (1) dissolving the drug in a water-miscible first solvent, (2) preparing a second solution of a polymer and an amphiphile in an aqueous second solvent in which the drug is substantially insoluble whereby a polymer/amphiphile complex is formed and (3) mixing the solutions from the first and second steps to precipitate an aggregate of the drug and polymer/amphiphile complex.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,410 discloses a pharmaceutical nanosuspension suitable for parenteral administration. The '410 patent discloses subjecting at least one solid therapeutically active compound dispersed in a solvent to high pressure homogenization in a piston-gap homogenizer to form particles having an average diameter, determined by photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) of 10 nm to 1000 nm, the proportion of particles larger than 5 gm in the total population being less than 0.1% (number distribution determined with a Coulter counter), without prior conversion into a melt, wherein the active compound is solid at room temperature and is insoluble, only sparingly soluble or moderately soluble in water, aqueous media and/or organic solvents. The Examples in the '410 Patent disclose jet milling prior to homogenization.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,454 discloses a method for making uniformly sized particles from solid compounds. The method of the '454 Patent includes the steps of dissolving the solid compound in a suitable solvent followed by infusing precipitating liquid thereby precipitating non-aggregated particles with substantially uniform mean diameter. The particles are then separated from the solvent. The '454 Patent discourages forming particles in a crystalline state because during the precipitating procedure the crystal can dissolve and recrystallize thereby broadening the particle size distribution range. The '454 Patent encourages during the precipitating procedure to trap the particles in a metastable particle state.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,605,785 discloses a process for forming nanoamorphous dispersions of photographically useful compounds. The process of forming nanoamorphous dispersions include any known process of emulsification that produces a disperse phase having amorphous particulates.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides processes to produce stable particles of an organic compound that are suitable for delivery intravenously. The processes can be divided into three separate categories based upon physical properties of the organic compound prior to and after adding energy to the organic compound through high shear agitation or heating or both. The three categories of processes each share the steps of: (1) dissolving the organic compound in a water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, (2) mixing the solution with a second solvent to define a pre-suspension, and (3) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 μm. The three categories of processes are distinguished based upon I,, the physical properties of the organic compound as determined through x-ray diffraction studies, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies or other suitable study conducted prior to the energy-addition step and after the energy-addition step.




In the first process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound in the presuspension takes an amorphous form, a semi-crystalline form or a supercooled liquid form and has an average effective particle size. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having an average effective particle size essentially the same as that of the presuspension and within the desired particle size ranges, namely having an average effective particle size of about 400 nm to about 2 microns.




In the second process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound in the presuspension is in a crystalline form and has an average effective particle size. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having an average effective particle size essentially the same as that of the presuspension and within the desired particle size ranges, namely having an average effective particle diameter of about 400 nm to about 2 microns. The particles after the energy-addition step have a reduced tendency to aggregate into larger particles when compared to particles of the presuspension.




What is meant by “essentially the same size” is the particles fall within the size range of from about 400 nm to about 2 μm.




In the third process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form that is friable and has an average effective particle size. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having an average effective particle size smaller than the crystals of the pre-suspension. By taking the steps necessary to place the organic compound in a crystalline form that is friable, the subsequent energy-addition step can be carried out more quickly and efficiently when compared to an organic compound in a less friable crystalline morphology.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a diagrammatic representation of one method of the present invention;





FIG. 2

show a diagrammatic representation of another method of the present invention;





FIG. 3

shows amorphous particles prior to homogenization;





FIG. 4

shows particles after annealing by homogenization;





FIG. 5

is an X-Ray diffractogram of microprecipitated itraconazole with polyethylene glycol-660 12-hydroxystearate before and after homogenization;





FIG. 6

shows Carbamazepine crystals before homogenization;





FIG. 7

shows Carbamazepine microparticulate after homogenization (Avestin C-50);





FIG. 8

is a diagram of illustrating the Microprecipitation Process for Prednisolone;





FIG. 9

is a photomicrograph of prednisolone suspension before homogenization; and





FIG. 10

is a photomicrograph of prednisolone suspension after homogenization.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is susceptible of embodiments in many different forms. Preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as exemplifications of the principles of the invention and are not intended to limit the broad aspects of the invention to the embodiments illustrated.




The present invention provides methods or processes for forming particles of an organic compound having an average effective particle size suitable for parenteral administration and, in a most preferred form of the invention, is from about 400 nm to about 2 μm. It should be understood the present invention further contemplates making particles having an average effective particle size in other size ranges such as less than about 7 μm, more preferably less than about 3 μm, more preferably less than about 2 μm, even more preferably less than about 1 μm, even more preferably less than about 500 nm and most preferably less than 400 nm or any range or combination of ranges therein.




The processes can be separated into three general categories. Each of the categories of processes share the steps of: (1) dissolving an organic compound in a water miscible first organic solvent to define a first solution, (2) mixing the first solution with a second solvent of water to precipitate the organic compound to define a pre-suspension, and (3) adding energy to the presuspension in the form of high-shear mixing or heat to provide a stable form of the organic compound having the desired size ranges defined above.




The three categories of processes are distinguished based upon the physical properties of the organic compound as determined through x-ray diffraction studies, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies or other suitable study conducted prior to the energy-addition step and after the energy-addition step. In the first process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound in the presuspension takes an amorphous form, a semi-crystalline form or a supercooled liquid form and has an average effective particle size. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having an average effective particle size essentially the same as that of the presuspension (i.e., from about 400 nm to about 2 μm).




In the second process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form and has an average effective particle size. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having essentially the same average effective particle size as prior to the energy-addition step but the crystals after the energy-addition step are less likely to aggregate.




The lower tendency of the organic compound to aggregate is observed by laser dynamic light scattering and light microscopy.




In the third process category, prior to the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form that is friable and has an average effective particle size. What is meant by the term “friable” is that the particles are fragile and are more easily broken down into smaller particles. After the energy-addition step the organic compound is in a crystalline form having an average effective particle size smaller than the crystals of the pre-suspension. By taking the steps necessary to place the organic compound in a crystalline form that is friable, the subsequent energy-addition step can be carried out more quickly and efficiently when compared to an organic compound in a less friable crystalline morphology.




The energy-addition step can be carried out in any fashion wherein the pre-suspension is exposed to cavitation, shearing or impact forces. In one preferred form of the invention, the energy-addition step is an annealing step. Annealing is defined in this invention as the process of converting matter that is thermodynamically unstable into a more stable form by single or repeated application of energy (direct heat or mechanical stress), followed by thermal relaxation. This lowering of energy may be achieved by conversion of the solid form from a less ordered to a more ordered lattice structure. Alternatively, this stabilization may occur by a reordering of the surfactant molecules at the solid-liquid interface.




These three process categories will be discussed separately below. It should be understood, however, that the process conditions such as choice of surfactants or combination of surfactants, amount of surfactant used, temperature of reaction, rate of mixing of solutions, rate of precipitation and the like can be selected to allow for any drug to be processed under any one of the categories discussed next.




The first process category, as well as the second and third process categories, can be further divided into two subcategories, Method A, and B shown diagramatically in

FIGS. 1 and 2

respectively.




An organic compound for use in the process of this invention is any organic chemical entity whose solubility decreases from one solvent to another. This organic compound might be a pharmaceutically active compound from various groups such as, but not limited to: antihyperlipidemics; antimicrobials, e.g., antibacterials such as sulfadiazine, antifungals such as itraconazole; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g., indomethacin; antihypercholesteremic agents, e.g., probucol; and steroidal compounds, e.g., dexamethasone; immunosuppresants, e.g., cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Or the organic compound might be from the group used as adjuvants or excipients in pharmaceutical preparations and cosmetics, such as, but not limited to, preservatives, e.g., propylparaben.




The first solvent according to the present invention is a solvent or mixture of solvents in which the organic compound of interest is relatively soluble and which is miscible with the second solvent. Examples of such solvents include, but are not limited to: polyvinylpyrrolidone, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (also called N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone), 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol (butanediol), ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides (such as glyceryl caprylate), dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane, polyethylene glycol (for example, PEG-4, PEG-8, PEG-9, PEG-12, PEG-14, PEG-16, PEG-120, PEG-75, PEG-150, polyethylene glycol esters (examples such as PEG-4 dilaurate, PEG-20 dilaurate, PEG-6 isostearate, PEG-8 palmitostearate, PEG-150 palm itostearate), polyethylene glycol sorbitans (such as PEG-20 sorbitan isostearate), polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers (examples such as PEG-3 dimethyl ether, PEG-4 dimethyl ether), polypropylene glycol (PPG), polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate/dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate.




Method A




In Method A (see FIG.


1


), the organic compound (“drug”) is first dissolved in the first solvent to define a first solution. The organic compound can be added from about 0.1% (w/v) to about 50% (w/v) depending on the solubility of the organic compound in the first solvent. Heating of the concentrate from about 30° C. to about 100° C. may be necessary to ensure total dissolution of the compound in the first solvent. A second aqueous solution is provided with one or more optional surface modifiers such as an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant or a nonionic surfactant added thereto. Suitable anionic surfactants include but are not limited to potassium laurate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inosine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, cholic acid and other bile acids (e.g., cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, glycocholic acid, taurocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid) and salts thereof (e.g., sodium deoxycholate, etc.). Suitable cationic surfactants include but are not limited to quaternary ammonium compounds, such as benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride, acyl carnitine hydrochlorides, or alkyl pyridinium halides. As anionic surfactants, phospholipids may be used. Suitable phospholipids include, for example phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophospholipids, egg or soybean phospholipid or a combination thereof. The phospholipid may be salted or desalted, hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated or natural semisynthetic or synthetic.




Suitable nonionic surfactants include: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers (Macrogol and Brij), polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters (Polysorbates), polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters (Myrj), sorbitan esters (Span), glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, aryl alkyl polyether alcohols, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers (poloxomers), polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone. In a preferred form of the invention the nonionic surfactant is a polyoxyethylene and polyoxypropylene copolymer and preferably a block copolymer of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol. Such polymers are sold under the tradename POLOXAMER also sometimes referred to as PLURONIC©, and sold by several suppliers including Spectrum Chemical and Ruger. Among polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters is included those having short alkyl chains. One example of such a surfactant is Solutol® HS 15, polyethylene-660-hydroxystearate, manufactured by BASF Aktiengesellschaft.




Other nonionic surface modifiers include surface active biological molecules such as albumin, heparin, hirudin or other appropriate proteins or polysaccharides.




It may also be desirable to add a pH adjusting agent to the second solution such as sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, tris buffer or citrate, acetate, lactate, meglumine, or the like. The second solution should have a pH within the range of from about 3 to about 11.




In a preferred form of the invention, the method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound includes the steps of adding the first solution to the second solution. The addition rate is dependent on the batch size, and precipitation kinetics for the organic compound. Typically, for a small-scale laboratory process (preparation of 1 liter), the addition rate is from about 0.05 cc per minute to about 10 cc per minute. During the addition, the solutions should be under constant agitation. It has been observed using light microscopy that amorphous particles, semi-crystalline solids, or a supercooled liquid are formed to define a pre-suspension. The method further includes the step of subjecting the pre-suspension to an annealing step to convert the amorphous particles, supercooled liquid or semicrystalline solid to a crystalline more stable solid state. The resulting particles will have an average effective particles size as measured by dynamic light scattering methods (e.g., photocorrelation spectroscopy, laser diffraction, low-angle laser light scattering (LALLS), medium-angle laser light scattering (MALLS), light obscuration methods (Coulter method, for example), rheology, or microscopy (light or electron) within the ranges set forth above).




The energy-addition step involves adding energy through sonication, homogenization, counter current flow homogenization, microfluidization, or other methods of providing impact, shear or cavitation forces. The sample may be cooled or heated during this stage. In one preferred form of the invention the annealing step is effected by a piston gap homogenizer such as the one sold by Avestin Inc. under the product designation EmulsiFlex-C160. In another preferred form of the invention the annealing may be accomplished by ultrasonication using an ultrasonic processor such as the Vibra-Cell Ultrasonic Processor (600W), manufactured by Sonics and Materials, Inc. In yet another preferred form of the invention the annealing may be accomplished by use of an emulsification apparatus as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,551 which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.




Depending upon the rate of annealing, it may be desirable to adjust the temperature of the processed sample to within the range of from approximately −30° C. to 30° C. Alternatively, in order to effect a desired phase change in the processed solid, it may also be necessary to heat the pre-suspension to a temperature within the range of from about 30° C. to about 100° C. during the annealing step.




Method B




Method B differs from Method A in the following respects. The first difference is a surfactant or combination of surfactants is added to the first solution. The surfactants may be selected from the groups of anionic, nonionic and cationinc surfactants set forth above.




Comparative Example of Method A and Method B and U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,062




U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,062 discloses a process for preparing small particles of an organic compound by first dissolving the compound in a suitable water-miscible first solvent. A second solution is prepared by dissolving a polymer and an amphiphile in aqueous solution. The first solution is then added to the second solution to form a precipitate that consists of the organic compound and a polymer-amphiphile complex. The '062 Patent does not disclose utilizing the energy-addition step of this invention in Methods A and B. Lack of stability is typically evidenced by rapid aggregation and particle growth. In some instances, amorphous particles recrystallize as large crystals. Adding energy to the pre-suspension in the manner disclosed above typically affords particles that show decreased rates of particle aggregation and growth, as well as the absence of recrystallization upon product storage.




Methods A and B are further distinguished from the process of the '062 patent by the absence of a step of forming a polymer-amphiphile complex prior to precipitation. In Method A, such a complex cannot be formed as no polymer is added to the diluent (aqueous) phase. In Method B, the surfactant, which may also act as an amphiphile, or polymer, is dissolved with the organic compound in the first solvent. This precludes the formation of any amphiphile-polymer complexes prior to precipitation. In the '062 Patent, successful precipitation of small particles relies upon the formation of an amphiphile-polymer complex prior to precipitation. The '062 Patent discloses the amphiphile-polymer complex forms aggregates in the aqueous second solution. The '062 Patent explains the hydrophobic organic compound interacts with the amphiphile-polymer complex, thereby reducing solubility of these aggregates and causing precipitation. In the present invention it has been demonstrated that the inclusion of the surfactant or polymer in the first solvent (Method B) leads, upon subsequent addition to second solvent, to formation of a more uniform, finer particulate than is afforded by the process outlined by the '062 Patent.




To this end, two formulations were prepared and analyzed. Each of the formulations have two solutions, a concentrate and an aqueous diluent, which are mixed together and then sonicated. The concentrate in each formulation has an organic compound (itraconazole), a water miscible solvent (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone or NMP) and possibly a polymer (poloxamer 188). The aqueous diluent has water, a tris buffer and possibly a polymer (poloxamer 188) and/or a surfactant (sodium deoxycholate). The average particle diameter of the organic particle is measured prior to sonication and after sonication.




The first formulation A has as the concentrate itraconazole and NMP. The aqueous diluent includes water, poloxamer 188, tris buffer and sodium deoxycholate. Thus the aqueous diluent includes a polymer (poloxamer 188), and an amphiphile (sodium deoxycholate), which may form a polymer/amphiphile complex, and, therefore, is in accordance with the disclosure of the '062 Patent. (However, again the '062 Patent does not disclose an energy addition step.)




The second formulation B has as the concentrate itraconazole, NMP and poloxamer 188. The aqueous diluent includes water, tris buffer and sodium deoxycholate. This formulation is made in accordance with the present invention. Since the aqueous diluent does not contain a combination of a polymer (poloxamer) and an amphiphile (sodium deoxycholate), a polymer/amphiphile complex cannot form prior to the mixing step.




Table 1 shows the average particle diameters measured by laser diffraction on three replicate suspension preparations. An initial size determination was made, after which the sample was sonicated for 1 minute. The size determination was then repeated. The large size reduction upon sonication of Method A was indicative of particle aggregation.
















TABLE 1












Average particle




After sonication






Method




Concentrate




Aqueous Diluent




diameter (microns)




(1 minute)



























A




itraconazole (18%), N-methyl-




poloxamer 188 (2.3%),




18.7




2.36







2-pyrrolidinone (6 mL)




sodium deoxycholate




10.7




2.46








(0.3%) tris buffer (5 mM,




12.1




1.93








pH 8) water (qs to 94 mL)






B




itraconazole (18%) poloxamer




sodium deoxycholate




0.194




0.198







188 (37%) N-methyl-2-




(0.3%) tris buffer (5 mM,




0.178




0.179







pyrrolidinone (6 mL)




pH 8) water (qs to 94 mL)




0.181




0.177














A drug suspension resulting from application of the processes described in this invention may be administered directly as an injectable solution, provided Water for Injection is used in formulation and an appropriate means for solution sterilization is applied. Sterilization may be accomplished by separate sterilization of the drug concentrate (drug, solvent, and optional surfactant) and the diluent medium (water, and optional buffers and surfactants) prior to mixing to form the pre-suspension. Sterilization methods would include pre-filtration first through a 3.0 micron filter followed by filtration through a 0.45-micron particle filter, followed by steam or heat sterilization or sterile filtration through two redundant 0.2-micron membrane filters.




Optionally, a solvent-free suspension may be produced by solvent removal after precipitation. This can be accomplished by centrifugation, dialysis, diafiltration, force-field fractionation, high-pressure filtration or other separation techniques well known in the art. Complete removal of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone was typically carried out by one to three successive centrifugation runs; after each centrifugation (18,000 rpm for 30 minutes) the supernatant was decanted and discarded. A fresh volume of the suspension vehicle without the organic solvent was added to the remaining solids and the mixture was dispersed by homogenization. It will be recognized by others skilled in the art that other high-shear mixing techniques could be applied in this reconstitution step.




Furthermore, any undesired excipients such as surfactants may be replaced by a more desirable excipient by use of the separation methods described in the above paragraph. The solvent and first excipient may be discarded with the supernatant after centrifugation or filtration. A fresh volume of the suspension vehicle without the solvent and without the first excipient may then be added. Alternatively, a new surfactant may be added. For example, a suspension consisting of drug, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (solvent), poloxamer 188 (first excipient), sodium deoxycholate, glycerol and water may be replaced with phospholipids (new surfactant), glycerol and water after centrifugation and removal of the supernatant.




I. First Process Category




The methods of the first process category generally include the step of dissolving the organic compound in a water miscible first solvent followed by the step of mixing this solution with an aqueous solution to form a presuspension wherein the organic compound is in an amorphous form, a semicrystalline form or in a supercooled liquid form as determined by x-ray diffraction studies, DSC, light microscopy or other analytical techniques and has an average effective particle size within one of the effective particle size ranges set forth above. The mixing step is followed by an energy-addition step and, in a preferred form of the invention an annealing step.




II. Second Process Category




The methods of the second processes category include essentially the same steps as in the steps of the first processes category but differ in the following respect. An x-ray diffraction, DSC or other suitable analytical techniques of the presuspension shows the organic compound in a crystalline form and having an average effective particle size.




The organic compound after the energy-addition step has essentially the same average effective particle size as prior to the energy-addition step but has less of a tendency to aggregate into larger particles when compared to that of the particles of the presuspension. Without being bound to a theory, it is believed the differences in the particle stability may be due to a reordering of the surfactant molecules at the solid-liquid interface.




III. Third Process Category




The methods of the third category modify the first two steps of those of the first and second processes categories to ensure the organic compound in the presuspension is in a friable form having an average effective particle size (e.g., such as slender needles and thin plates). Friable particles can be formed by selecting suitable solvents, surfactants or combination of surfactants, the temperature of the individual solutions, the rate of mixing and rate of precipitation and the like. Friability may also be enhanced by the introduction of lattice defects (e.g., cleavage planes) during the steps of mixing the first solution with the aqueous solution. This would arise by rapid crystallization such as that afforded in the precipitation step. In the energy-addition step these friable crystals are converted to crystals that are kinetically stabilized and having an average effective particle size smaller than those of the presuspension. Kinetically stabilized means particles have a reduced tendency to aggregate when compared to particles that are not kinetically stabilized. In such instance the energy-addition step results in a breaking up of the friable particles. By ensuring the particles of the presuspension are in a friable state, the organic compound can more easily and more quickly be prepared into a particle within the desired size ranges when compared to processing an organic compound where the steps have not been taken to render it in a friable form.




EXAMPLES




Examples of Process Category 1




Example 1




Preparation of itraconazole suspension by use of Process Category 1, Method A with homogenization




To a 3-L flask add 1680 mL of Water for Injection. Heat liquid to 60-65° C., and then slowly add 44 grams of Pluronic F-68 (poloxamer 188), and 12 grams of sodium deoxycholate, stirring after each addition to dissolve the solids. After addition of solids is complete, stir for another 15 minutes at 60-65° C. to ensure complete dissolution. Prepare a 50 mM tris (tromethamine) buffer by dissolving 6.06 grams of tris in 800 mL of Water for Injection. Titrate this solution to pH 8.0 with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Dilute the resulting solution to 1 liter with additional Water for Injection. Add 200 mL of the tris buffer to the poloxamer/deoxycholate solution. Stir thoroughly to mix solutions.




In a 150-mL beaker add 20 grams of itraconazole and 120 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. Heat mixture to 50-60° C., and stir to dissolve solids. After total dissolution is visually apparent, stir another 15 minutes to ensure complete dissolution. Cool itraconazole-NMP solution to room temperature.




Charge a syringe pump (two 60-mL glass syringes) with the 120-mL of itraconazole solution prepared previously. Meanwhile pour all of the surfactant solution into a homogenizer hopper which has been cooled to 0-5° C. (this may either by accomplished by use of a jacketed hopper through which refrigerant is circulated, or by surrounding the hopper with ice). Position a mechanical stirrer into the surfactant solution so that the blades are fully immersed. Using the syringe pump, slowly (1-3 mL/min) add all of the itraconazole solution to the stirred, cooled surfactant solution. A stirring rate of at least 700 rpm is recommended. An aliquot of the resulting suspension (Suspension A) is analyzed by light microscopy (Hoffman Modulation Contrast) and by laser diffraction (Horiba). Suspension A is observed by light microscopy to consist of roughly spherical amorphous particles (under 1 micron), either bound to each other in aggregates or freely moving by Brownian motion. See FIG.


3


. Dynamic light scattering measurements typically afford a bimodal distribution pattern signifying the presence of aggregates (10-100 microns in size) and the presence of single amorphous particles ranging 200-700 nm in median particle diameter.




The suspension is immediately homogenized (at 10,000 to 30,000 psi) for 10-30 minutes. At the end of homogenization, the temperature of the suspension in the hopper does not exceed 75° C. The homogenized suspension is collected in 500-ml, bottles, which are cooled immediately in the refrigerator (2-8° C.). This suspension (Suspension B) is analyzed by light microscopy and is found to consist of small elongated plates with a length of 0.5 to 2 microns and a width in the 0.2-1 micron range. See FIG.


4


. Dynamic light scattering measurements typically indicate a median diameter of 200-700 nm.




Stability of Suspension A (“Pre-suspension”) (Example 1)




During microscopic examination of the aliquot of Suspension A, crystallization of the amorphous solid was directly observed. Suspension A was stored at 2-8° C. for 12 hours and examined by light microscopy. Gross visual inspection of the sample revealed severe flocculation, with some of the contents settling to the bottom of the container. Microscopic examination indicated the presence of large, elongated, plate-like crystals over 10 microns in length.




Stability of Suspension B




As opposed to the instability of Suspension A, Suspension B was stable at 2-8° C. for the duration of the preliminary stability study (1 month). Microscopy on the aged sample clearly demonstrated that no significant change in the morphology or size of the particles had occurred. This was confirmed by light scattering measurement.




Example 2




Preparation of itraconazole suspension by use of Process Category I, Method A with ultrasonication




To a 500-mL stainless steel vessel add 252 mL of Water for Injection. Heat liquid to 60-65° C., and then slowly add 6.6 grams of Pluronic F-68 (poloxamer 188), and 0.9 grams of sodium deoxycholate, stirring after each addition to dissolve the solids. After addition of solids is complete, stir for another 15 minutes at 60-65° C. to ensure complete dissolution. Prepare a 50 mM tris (tromethamine) buffer by dissolving 6.06 grams of tris in 800 mL of Water for Injection. Titrate this solution to pH 8.0 with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Dilute the resulting solution to 1 liter with additional Water for Injection. Add 30 ml, of the tris buffer to the poloxamer/deoxycholate solution. Stir thoroughly to mix solutions.




In a 30-mL container add 3 grams of itraconazole and 18 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. Heat mixture to 50-60° C., and stir to dissolve solids. After total dissolution is visually apparent, stir another 15 minutes to ensure complete dissolution. Cool itraconazole-NMP solution to room temperature.




Charge a syringe pump with 18-mL of itraconazole solution prepared in a previous step. Position a mechanical stirrer into the surfactant solution so that the blades are fully immersed. Cool the container to 0-5° C. by immersion in an ice bath. Using the syringe pump, slowly (1-3 mL/min) add all of the itraconazole solution to the stirred, cooled surfactant solution. A stirring rate of at least 700 rpm is recommended. Immerse an ultrasonicator horn in the resulting suspension so that the probe is approximately 1 cm above the bottom of the stainless steel vessel. Sonicate (10,000 to 25,000 Hz, at least 400W) for 15 to 20 minute in 5-minute intervals. After the first 5-minute sonication, remove the ice bath and proceed with further sonication. At the end of ultrasonication, the temperature of the suspension in the vessel does not exceed 75° C.




The suspension is collected in a 500-mL Type I glass bottle, which is cooled immediately in the refrigerator (2-8° C.). Characteristics of particle morphology of the suspension before and after sonication were very similar to that seen in Method A before and after homogenization (see Example 1).




Example 3




Preparation of itraconazole suspension by use of Process Category 1, Method B with homogenization




Prepare a 50 mM tris (tromethamine) buffer by dissolving 6.06 grams of tris in 800 mL of Water for Injection. Titrate this solution to pH 8.0 with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Dilute the resulting solution to 1 liter with additional Water for Injection. To a 3-L flask add 1680 mL of Water for Injection. Add 200 mL of the tris buffer to the 1680 mL of water. Stir thoroughly to mix solutions.




In a 150-ml- beaker add 44 grams of Pluronic F-68 (poloxamer 188) and 12 grams of sodium deoxycholate to 120 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. Heat the mixture to 50-60° C., and stir to dissolve solids. After total dissolution is visually apparent, stir another 15 minutes to ensure complete dissolution. To this solution, add 20 grams of itraconazole, and stir until totally dissolved. Cool the itraconazole-surfactant-NMP solution to room temperature.




Charge a syringe pump (two 60-mL glass syringes) with the 120-ml- of the concentrated itraconazole solution prepared previously. Meanwhile pour the diluted tris buffer solution prepared above into a homogenizer hopper which has been cooled to 0-5° C. (this may either by accomplished by use of a jacketed hopper through which refrigerant is circulated, or by surrounding the hopper with ice). Position a mechanical stirrer into the buffer solution so that the blades are fully immersed. Using the syringe pump, slowly (1-3 mL/min) add all of the itraconazole-surfactant concentrate to the stirred, cooled buffer solution. A stirring rate of at least 700 rpm is recommended. The resulting cooled suspension is immediately homogenized (at 10,000 to 30,000 psi) for 10-30 minutes. At the end of homogenization, the temperature of the suspension in the hopper does not exceed 75° C.




The homogenized suspension is collected in 500-mL bottles, which are cooled immediately in the refrigerator (2-8° C.). Characteristics of particle morphology of the suspension before and after homogenization were very similar to that seen in Example 1, except that in process category 1 B, the pre-homogenized material tended to form fewer and smaller aggregates which resulted in a much smaller overall particle size as measured by laser diffraction. After homogenization, dynamic light scattering results were typically identical to those presented in Example 1.




Example 4




Preparation of itraconazole suspension by use of Process Category 1, Method B with ultrasonication




To a 500-mL flask add 252 mL of Water for Injection. Prepare a 50 mM tris (tromethamine) buffer by dissolving 6.06 grams of tris in 800 mL of Water for Injection. Titrate this solution to pH 8.0 with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Dilute the resulting solution to 1 liter with additional Water for Injection. Add 30 mL of the tris buffer to the water. Stir thoroughly to mix solutions.




In a 30-mL beaker add 6.6 grams of Pluronic F-68 (poloxamer 188) and 0.9 grams of sodium deoxycholate to 18 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. Heat the mixture to 50-60° C., and stir to dissolve solids. After total dissolution is visually apparent, stir another 15 minutes to ensure complete dissolution. To this solution, add 3.0 grams of itraconazole, and stir until totally dissolved. Cool the itraconazole-surfactant-NMP solution to room temperature.




Charge a syringe pump (one 30-mL glass syringe with the 18-mL of the concentrated itraconazole solution prepared previously. Position a mechanical stirrer into the buffer solution so that the blades are fully immersed. Cool the container to 0-5° C. by immersion in an ice bath. Using the syringe pump, slowly (1-3 mL/min) add all of the itraconazole-surfactant concentrate to the stirred, cooled buffer solution. A stirring rate of at least 700 rpm is recommended. The resulting cooled suspension is immediately sonicated (10,000 to 25,000 Hz, at least 400 W) for 15-20 minutes, in 5-minute intervals.




After the first 5-minute sonication, remove the ice bath and proceed with further sonication. At the end of ultrasonication, the temperature of the suspension in the hopper does not exceed 75° C. The resultant suspension is collected in a 500-mL bottle, which is cooled immediately in the refrigerator (2-8° C.). Characteristics of particle morphology of the suspension before and after sonication were very similar to that seen in Example 1, except that in Process Category 1, Method B, the pre-sonicated material tended to form fewer and smaller aggregates which resulted in a much smaller overall particle size as measured by laser diffraction. After ultrasonication, dynamic light scattering results were typically identical to those presented in Example 1.




B. Examples of Process Category 2




Example 5




Preparation of itraconazole suspension (1%) with 0.75% Solutol® HR (PEG-660 12-hydroxystearate) Process Category 2, Method B




Solutol (2.25 g) and itraconazole (3.0 g) were weighed into a beaker and 36 mL of filtered N-methyl-2-pyrrolidi none (NMP) was added. This mixture was stirred under low heat (up to 40° C.) for approximately 15 minutes until the solution ingredients were dissolved. The solution was cooled to room temperature and was filtered through a 0.2-micron filter under vacuum. Two 60-mL syringes were filled with the filtered drug concentrate and were placed in a syringe pump. The pump was set to deliver approximately 1 mL/min of concentrate to a rapidly stirred (400 rpm) aqueous buffer solution. The buffer solution consisted of 22 g/L of glycerol in 5 mM tris buffer.




Throughout concentrate addition, the buffer solution was kept in an ice bath at 2-3° C. At the end of the precipitation, after complete addition of concentrate to the buffer solution, about 100 mL of the suspension was centrifuged for 1 hour, the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was resuspended in a 20% NMP solution in water, and again centrifuged for 1 hour. The material was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 25° C. The dried material was transferred to a vial and analyzed by X-ray diffractometry (see FIG.


5


).




Another 100 mL-aliquot of the microprecipitated suspension was sonicated for 30 minutes at 20,000 Hz, 80% full amplitute (full amplitude=600 W). The sonicated sample was homogenized in 3 equal aliquots each for 45 minutes (Avestin C5, 2-5° C., 15,000-20,000 psi). The combined fractions were centrifuged for about 3 hours, the supernatant removed, and the precipitate resuspended in 20% NMP. The resuspended mixture was centrifuged again (15,000 rpm at 5° C.). The supernatant was decanted off and the precipitate was vacuum dried overnight at 25° C. The precipitate was submitted for analysis by X-ray diffractometry (see FIG.


5


). As seen in

FIG. 5

, the X-ray diffraction patterns of processed samples, before and after homogenization, are essentially identical, yet show a significantly different pattern as compared with the starting raw material. The unhomogenized suspension is unstable and agglomerates upon storage at room temperature. The stabilization that occurs as a result of homogenization is believed to arise from rearrangement of surfactant on the surface of the particle. This rearrangement should result in a lower propensity for particle aggregation.




C. Examples of Process Category




Example 6




Preparation of carbamazepine suspension by use of Process Category 3, Method A with homogenization




2.08 g of carbamazepine was dissolved into 10 ml, of NMP. 1.0 mL of this concentrate was subsequently dripped at 0.1 mL/min into 20 mL of a stirred solution of 1.2% lecithin and 2.25% glycerin. The temperature of the lecithin system was held at 2-5° C. during the entire addition. The predispersion was next homogenized cold (5-15° C.) for 35 minutes at 15,000 psi. The pressure was increased to 23,000 psi and the homogenization was continued for another 20 minutes. The particles produced by the process had a mean diameter of 0.881 gm with 99% of the particles being less than 2.44 μm.




Example 7




Preparation of 1% carbamazepine suspension with 0.125% Solutol® by use of Process Category 3, Method B with homogenization




A drug concentrate of 20% carbamazepine and 5% glycodeoxycholic acid (Sigma Chemical Co.) in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone was prepared. The microprecipitation step involved adding the drug concentrate to the receiving solution (distilled water) at a rate of 0.1 mL/min. The receiving solution was stirred and maintained at approximately 5° C. during precipitation. After precipitation, the final ingredient concentrations were 1 carbamazepine and 0.125% Solutol®. The drug crystals were examined under a light microscope using positive phase contrast (400X). The precipitate consisted of fine needles approximately 2 microns in diameter and ranging from 50-150 microns in length.




Homogenization (Avestin C-50 piston-gap homogenizer) at approximately 20,000 psi for approximately 15 minutes results in small particles, less than 1 micron in size and largely unaggregated. Laser diffraction analysis (Horiba) of the homogenized material showed that the particles had a mean size of 0.4 micron with 99% of the particles less than 0.8 micron. Low energy sonication, suitable for breaking agglomerated particles, but not with sufficient energy to cause a cominution of individual particles, of the sample before Horiba analysis had no effect on the results (numbers were the same with and without sonication). This result was consistent with the absence of particle agglomeration.




Samples prepared by the above process were centrifuged and the supernatant solutions replaced with a replacement solution consisting of 0.125% Solutol®. After centrifugation and supernatant replacement, the suspension ingredient concentrations were 1% carbamazepine and 0.125% Solutol®. The samples were re-homogenized by piston-gap homogenizer and stored at 5° C. After 4 weeks storage, the suspension had a mean particle size of 0.751 with 99% less than 1.729. Numbers reported are from Horiba analysis on unsonicated samples.




Example 8




Preparation of 1% carbamazepine suspension with 0.06% sodium glycodeoxycholate and 0.06% poloxamer 188 by use of Process Category 3, Method B with homogenization




A drug concentrate comprising 20% carbamazepine and 5% glycodeoxycholate in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone was prepared. The microprecipitation step involved adding the drug concentrate to the receiving solution (distilled water) at a rate of 0.1 mL/min. Thus, this and the following examples demonstrate that adding a surfactant or other excipient to the aqueous precipitating solution in Methods A and B above is optional. The receiving solution was stirred and maintained at approximately 5° C. during precipitation.




After precipitation, the final ingredient concentrations were 1 carbamazepine and 0.125% Solutol®. The drug crystals were examined under a light microscope using positive phase contrast (400X). The precipitate consisted of fine needles approximately 2 microns in diameter and ranging from 50-150 microns in length. Comparison of the precipitate with the raw material before precipitation reveals that the precipitation step in the presence of surface modifier (glycodeoxycholic acid) results in very slender crystals that are much thinner than the starting raw material (see FIG.


6


).




Homogenization (Avestin C-50 piston-gap homogenizer) at approximately 20,000 psi for approximately 15 minutes results in small particles, less than 1 micron in size and largely unaggregated. See FIG.


7


. Laser diffraction analysis (Horiba) of the homogenized material showed that the particles had a mean size of 0.4 micron with 99% of the particles less than 0.8 micron. Sonication of the sample before Horiba analysis had no effect on the results (numbers were the same with and without sonication). This result was consistent with the absence of particle agglomeration.




Samples prepared by the above process were centrifuged and the supernatant solutions replaced with a replacement solution consisting of 0.06% glycodeoxycholic acid (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.06% Poloxamer 188. The samples were re-homogenized by piston-gap homogenizer and stored at 5° C. After 2 weeks storage, the suspension had a mean particle size of 0.531 micron with 99% less than 1.14 micron. Numbers reported are from Horiba analysis on unsonicated samples.




Mathematical Analysis (Example 8) of force required to break precipitated particles as compared to force required to break particles of the starting raw material (carbamazepine):




The width of the largest crystals seen in the carbamazepine raw material (

FIG. 6

, picture on left) are roughly 10-fold greater than the width of crystals in the microprecipitated material (

FIG. 6

, picture on right). On the assumption that the ratio of crystal thickness (1:10) is proportional to the ratio of crystal width (1:10), then the moment of force required to cleave the larger crystal in the raw material should be approximately 1,000-times greater than the force needed to break the microprecipitated material, since:






e


L


=6PL/(Ewx


2


)  Eq. 1






where,




e


L


=longitudinal strain required to break the crystal (“yield value”)




P=load on beam




L=distance from load to fulcrum




E=elasticity modulus




w=width of crystal




x=thickness of crystal




Let us assume that L and E are the same for the raw material and the precipitated material. Additionally, let us assume that w/w


0


=x/x


0


=10. Then,






(e


L


)


0


=6P


0


L/(Ew


0


x


0




2


), where the ‘0’ SUBSCRIPTS refer to raw material








e


L


=6PL/(Ewx


2


), for the microprecipitate






Equating (e


L


)


0


and e


L


,






6PL/(Ewx


2


)=6P


0


L/(Ew


0


x


0




2


)






After simplification,






P=P


0


(w/w


0


) (x/x


0


)


2


=P


0


(0.1) (0.1)


2


=0.001 P


0








Thus, the yield force, P, required to break the microprecipitated solid is one-thousandth the required force necessary to break the starting crystalline solid. If, because of rapid precipitation, lattice defects or amorphic properties are introduced, then the modulus (E) should decrease, making the microprecipitate even easier to cleave.




Example 9




Preparation of 1.6% (w/v) prednisolone suspension with 0.05% sodium deoxycholate and 3% N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone Process Category 3, Method B




A schematic of the overall manufacturing process is presented in

FIG. 8. A

concentrated solution of prednisolone and sodium deoxycholate was prepared. Prednisolone (32 g) and sodium deoxycholate (1 g) were added to a sufficient volume of 1-methyl 2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) to produce a final volume of 60 mL. The resulting prednisolone concentration was approximately 533.3 mg/mL and the sodium deoxycholate concentration was approximately 16.67 mg/mL. 60 mL of NMP concentrate was added to 2 L of water cooled to 5° C. at an addition rate of 2.5 mL/min while stirring at approximately 400 rpm. The resulting suspension contained slender needle-shaped crystals less than 2 μm in width (FIG.


9


). The concentration contained in the precipitated suspension was 1.6% (w/v) prednisolone, 0.05% sodium deoxycholate, and 3% NMP.




The precipitated suspension was pH adjusted to 7.5-8.5 using sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid then homogenized (Avestin C-50 piston-gap homogenizer) for 10 passes at 10,000 psi. The NMP was removed by performing 2 successive centrifugation steps replacing the supernatant each time with a fresh surfactant solution, which contained the desired concentrations of surfactants needed to stabilize the suspension (see Table 2). The suspension was homogenized for another 10 passes at 10,000 psi. The final suspension contained particles with a mean particle size of less than 1 μm, and 99% of particles less than 2 μm.

FIG. 10

is a photomicrograph of the final prednisolone suspension after homogenization.




A variety of different surfactants at varying concentrations were used in the centrifugation/surfactant replacement step (see Table 2). Table 2 lists combinations of surfactants that were stable with respect to particle size (mean<1 μm, 99% <2 μm), pH (6-8), drug concentration (less than 2% loss) and re-suspendability (resuspended in 60 seconds or less).




Notably this process allows for adding the active compound to an aqueous diluent without the presence of a surfactant or other additive. This is a modification of process Method B in FIG.


2


.












TABLE 2











List of stable prednisolone suspensions prepared by microprecipitation process of







FIG. 8

(Example 9)















2 Weeks




2 Months



















Initial




40° C.




5° C.




25° C.




40° C.




%






















Formulation




Mean




>99%




Mean




>99%




Mean




>99%




Mean




>99%




Mean




>99%




Loss*

























1.6% prednisolone,




0.79




1.65




0.84




1.79




0.83




1.86




0.82




1.78




0.82




1.93




<2°/






0.6%






phospholipids,






0.5% sodium






deoxycholate, 5






mM TRIS, 2.2%






glycerol**






1.6% prednisolone,




0.77




1.52




0.79




1.67




0.805




1.763




0.796




1.693




0.81




1.633




<2%






0.6% Solutol ®,






0.5% sodium






deoxycholate, 2.2%






glycerol






1.6% prednisolone,




0.64




1.16




0.82




1.78




0.696




1.385




0.758




1.698




0.719




1.473




<2%






0.1% poloxamer






188, 0.5% sodium






deoxycholate, 2.2%






glycerol






1.6% prednisolone,




0.824




1.77




0.87




1.93




0.88




1.950




.869




1.778




0.909




1.993




<2%






5% phospholipids,






5 mM TRIS, 2.2%






glycerol











*Difference in itraconazole concentration between samples stored for 2 months at 5 and 25° C.










**Stable through at least 6 months.













Particle sizes (by laser light scattering), in microns:




5° C.: 0.80 (mean), 1.7 (99%)




25° C.: 0.90 (mean); 2.51 (99%)




40° C.: 0.99 (mean); 2.03 (99%)




Difference in itraconazole concentration between samples stored at 5 and 25° C.: <2%




Example 10




Preparation of prednisolone suspension by use of Process Category 3, Method A with homogenization




32 g of prednisolone was dissolved into 40 mL of NMP. Gentle heating at 40-50° C. was required to effect dissolution. The drug NMP concentrate was subsequently dripped at 2.5 mL/min into 2 liters of a stirred solution that consisted of 0.1.2% lecithin and 2.2% glycerin. No other surface modifiers were added. The surfactant system was buffered at pH=8.0 with 5 mM tris buffer and the temperature was held at 0° to 5° C. during the entire precipitation process. The post-precipitated dispersion was next homogenized cold (5-15° C.) for 20 passes at 10,000 psi. Following homogenization, the NMP was removed by centrifuging the suspension, removing the supernatant, and replacing the supernatant with fresh surfactant solution. This post-centrifuged suspension was then rehomogenized cold (5-15° C.) for another 20 passes at 10,000 psi. The particles produced by this process had a mean diameter of 0.927 μm with 99% of the particles being less than 2.36 μm.




Example 11




Preparation of nabumetone suspension by use of Process Category 3, Method B with homogenization




Surfactant (2.2 g of poloxamer 188) was dissolved in 6 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. This solution was stirred at 45° C. for 15 minutes, after which 1.0 g of nabumetone was added. The drug dissolved rapidly. Diluent was prepared which consisted of 5 mM tris buffer with 2.2% glycerol, and adjusted to pH 8. A 100-ml portion of diluent was cooled in an ice bath. The drug concentrate was slowly added (approximately 0.8 mL/min) to the diluent with vigorous stirring. This crude suspension was homogenized at 15,000 psi for 30 minutes and then at 20,000 psi for 30 minutes (temperature=5° C.). The final nanosuspension was found to be 930 nm in effective mean diameter (analyzed by laser diffraction). 99% of the particles were less than approximately 2.6 microns.




Example 12




Preparation of nabumetone suspension by use of Process Category 3, Method B with homogenization and the use of Solutol® HS 15 as the surfactant




Replacement of supernatant liquid with a phospholipid medium.




Nabumetone (0.987 grams) was dissolved in 8 mL of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. To this solution was added 2.2 grams of Solutol® HS 15. This mixture was stirred until complete dissolution of the surfactant in the drug concentrate. Diluent was prepared, which consisted of 5 mM tris buffer with 2.2% glycerol, and which was adjusted to pH 8. The diluent was cooled in an ice bath, and the drug concentrate was slowly added (approximately 0.5 mL/min) to the diluent with vigorous stirring. This crude suspension was homogenized for 20 minutes at 15,000 psi, and for 30 minutes at 20,000 psi.




The suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes and the supernatant was removed and discarded. The remaining solid pellet was resuspended in a diluent consisting of 1.2% phospholipids. This medium was equal in volume to the amount of supernatant removed in the previous step. The resulting suspension was then homogenized at approximately 21,000 psi for 30 minutes. The final suspension was analyzed by laser diffraction and was found to contain particles with a mean diameter of 542 nm, and a 99% cumulative particle distribution sized less than 1 micron.




While specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, numerous modifications come to mind without departing from the spirit of the invention and the scope of protection is only limited by the scope of the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of:(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing the solution with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension; and (iii) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 microns.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step ofmixing into the second solvent a first surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactant.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the nonionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, albumin, heparin, and hirudin.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the anionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts, cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, glycocholic acid, taurocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid, and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryl dimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 6. The method of claim 2 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the anionic surfactant is a copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 9. The method of claim 2 further comprising the step of mixing into the second solvent a second surface modifier.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the second surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the second surface modifier is a bile salt or a salt thereof.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the second surface modifier is selected from deoxycholic acid, glycocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid, taurocholic acid and salts of these acids.
  • 13. The method of claim 2 further comprising the step of adding a pH adjusting agent to the second solvent.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the pH adjusting agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, tris buffer, citrate buffer, acetate, lactate, and meglumine.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the pH adjusting agent is added to the second solvent to bring the pH of the second solvent within the range of from about 3 to about 11.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:mixing into the solution a third surface modifier selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the nonionic surfactant of the third surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 wherein the anionic surfactant of the third surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 19. The method of claim 16 wherein the cationic surfactant of the third surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 20. The method of claim 16 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 wherein the third surface modifier is acopolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 23. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a fourth surface modifier.
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the fourth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein the fourth surface modifier is a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 26. The method of claim 24 wherein the fourth surface modifier is an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 27. The method of claim 24 wherein the fourth surface modifier is a cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 28. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of:mixing into the second solvent a fifth surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 wherein the fifth surface modifier is a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydrox propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 30. The method of claim 28 wherein the fifth surface modifier is an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 31. The method of claim 28 wherein the fifth surface modifier is a cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 32. The method of claim 28 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 33. The method of claim 32 wherein the fifth surface modifier is a copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 34. The method of claim 33 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 35. The method of claim 28 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a sixth surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 36. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:mixing into the second solvent a phospholipid.
  • 37. The method of claim 36 wherein the phospholipid is selected from natural phospholipids and synthetic phospholipids.
  • 38. The method of claim 36 wherein the phospholipid is selected from the group consisting of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophospholipids, egg phospholipid and soybean phospholipid.
  • 39. The method of claim 36 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a seventh surface modifier selected from anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and non-ionic surfactants.
  • 40. The method of claim 39 wherein the nonionic surfactant of the seventh surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 41. The method of claim 39 wherein the anionic surfactant of the seventh surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 42. The method of claim 39 wherein the cationic surfactant of the seventh surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 43. The method of claim 39 wherein the seventh surface modifier is a bile acid or a salt thereof.
  • 44. The method of claim 39 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 45. The method of claim 44 further comprising the step of adding a phospholipid to the second solvent.
  • 46. The method of claim 45 wherein the phospholipid is selected from natural phospholipids and synthetic phospholipids.
  • 47. The method of claim 45 wherein the phospholipid is selected from the group consisting of: phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophospholipids, egg phospholipid and soybean phospholipid.
  • 48. The method of claim 45 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution an eighth surface modifier selected from anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and non-ionic surfactants.
  • 49. The method of claim 48 wherein the nonionic surfactant of the eighth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 50. The method of claim 48 wherein the anionic surfactant of the eighth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 51. The method of claim 48 wherein the cationic surfactant of the eighth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 52. The method of claim 48 wherein the eighth surface modifier is a bile acid or a salt thereof.
  • 53. The method of claim 48 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 54. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of:(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing into the second solvent a first surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants; (iii) mixing the solution with the second solvent and first surface modifier to define a pre-suspension; and (iv) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 microns.
  • 55. The method of claim 54 wherein the nonionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 56. The method of claim 54 wherein the anionic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 57. The method of claim 54 wherein the cationic surfactant is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 58. The method of claim 54 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 59. The method of claim 58 wherein the anionic surfactant is a copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 60. The method of claim 59 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 61. The method of claim 54 further comprising the step of mixing into the second solvent a second surface modifier.
  • 62. The method of claim 61 wherein the second surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 63. The method of claim 62 wherein the second surface modifier is selected from bile acids and salts thereof.
  • 64. The method of claim 54 further comprising the step of adding a pH adjusting agent to the second solvent.
  • 65. The method of claim 64 wherein the pH adjusting agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, citrate buffer, acetate, lactate, and meglumine.
  • 66. The method of claim 64 wherein the pH adjusting agent is added to the second solvent to bring the pH of the second solvent within the range of from about 4 to about 10.
  • 67. The method of claim 54 wherein the energy-addition step comprises the step of:subjecting the pre-suspension to heating, sonication, homogenization, counter current flow homogenization or microfluidization.
  • 68. The method of claim 67 wherein the energy-addition step further comprises the step of subjecting the pre-suspension to heat.
  • 69. The method of claim 54 further comprising the step of removing solvent and excess surfactants.
  • 70. The method of claim 69 wherein the solvent and surfactant removal step is accomplished via centrifugation, diafiltration, force-field fractionation, or high-pressure filtration.
  • 71. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of:(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing into the solution a first surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants; (iii) mixing the solution and first surface modifier with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension; and (iv) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 microns.
  • 72. The method of claim 71 wherein the nonionic surfactant of the first surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 73. The method of claim 71 wherein the anionic surfactant of the first surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 74. The method of claim 71 wherein the cationic surfactant of the first surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 75. The method of claim 71 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 76. The method of claim 75 wherein the first surface modifier is a copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 77. The method of claim 76 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 78. The method of claim 71 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a second surface modifier.
  • 79. The method of claim 71 further comprising the step of:mixing into the second solvent a third surface modifier selected from the group consisting of: anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 80. The method of claim 79 wherein the third surface modifier is a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 81. The method of claim 79 wherein the third surface modifier is an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamine stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 82. The method of claim 79 wherein the third surface modifier is a cationic surfactant selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 83. The method of claim 79 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 84. The method of claim 75 wherein the second surface modifier is a copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene.
  • 85. The method of claim 84 wherein the copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene is a block copolymer.
  • 86. The method of claim 79 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a fourth surface modifier selected from the group consisting of anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and nonionic surfactants.
  • 87. The method of claim 71 further comprising the step of:mixing into the second solvent a phospholipid.
  • 88. The method of claim 87 wherein the phospholipid is selected from natural phospholipids and synthetic phospholipids.
  • 89. The method of claim 87 wherein the phospholipid is selected from the group consisting of: phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidic acid, lysophospholipids, egg phospholipid and soybean phospholipid.
  • 90. The method of claim 87 further comprising the step of mixing into the solution a fifth surface modifier selected from anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants and non-ionic surfactants.
  • 91. The method of claim 90 wherein the nonionic surfactant of the fifth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, sorbitan esters, glycerol monostearate, polyethylene glycols, cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, poloxamers, polaxamines, methylcellulose, hydroxycellulose, hydroxy propylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose, noncrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 92. The method of claim 90 wherein the anionic surfactant of the fifth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of: potassium laurate, triethanolamme stearate, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkyl polyoxyethylene sulfates, sodium alginate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, phosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl inositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidic acid and their salts, glyceryl esters, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, bile acids and their salts and calcium carboxymethylcellulose.
  • 93. The method of claim 90 wherein the cationic surfactant of the fifth surface modifier is selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, chitosans and lauryldimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 94. The method of claim 90 wherein the fifth surface modifier is bile acids and their salts.
  • 95. The method of claim 90 wherein the first solvent is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
  • 96. The method of claim 95 wherein the energy-addition step comprises the step of:subjecting the pre-suspension to heating, sonication, homogenization, counter current flow homogenization or microfluidization.
  • 97. The method of claim 96 wherein the energy-addition step further comprises the step of subjecting the pre-suspension to heat.
  • 98. The method of claim 96 further comprising the step of removing solvent and excess surfactants through repeated removal and replacement of the supernatant fluid.
  • 99. The method of claim 98 wherein the solvent and surfactant removal step is accomplished via centrifugation, diafiltration, force-field fractionation, or high-pressure filtration.
  • 100. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of:(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane,ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing the solution with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension wherein the organic compound is in an amorphous form, a semicrystalline form or in a supercooled liquid form as determined by DSC and having an average effective particle size; and (iii) annealing the pre-suspension to form particles having essentially the same average effective particle size of the pre-suspension and in a more stable form.
  • 101. The method of claim 100 wherein the annealing step includes the step of converting the particles of the presuspension to a crystalline form as determined by DSC.
  • 102. The method of claim 100 wherein the particles after the annealing step have a reduced tendency to aggregate into larger particles when compared to the particles of the pre-suspension.
  • 103. The method of claim 100 wherein the particles of the presuspension have an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 pm.
  • 104. The method of claim 103 wherein the particles after the annealing step have an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 gym.
  • 105. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of:(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane,ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing the solution with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension of particles of the organic compound in a crystalline form as determined by DSC, the particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 microns and having a first tendency to agglomerate; and (iii) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having a second tendency to agglomerate and wherein the second tendency to agglomerate is less than the first tendency to agglomerate.
  • 106. The method of claim 105 wherein the particles after the energy-addition step are in a crystalline form as measured by DSC.
  • 107. The method of claim 106 wherein the particles after the energy-addition step have essentially the same average effective particle size when compared to the average effective particle size of the particles of the presuspension.
  • 108. A method for preparing submicron sized particles of an organic compound, the solubility of which is greater in a water-miscible first solvent than in a second solvent which is aqueous, the process comprising the steps of(i) dissolving the organic compound in the water-miscible first solvent to form a solution, the first solvent being selected from the group consisting of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, 2-pyrrolidone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylacetamide, lactic acid, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, 3-pentanol, n-propanol, glycerol, butylene glycol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, mono- and diacylated monoglycerides, dimethyl isosorbide, acetone, dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane,ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol esters, polyethylene glycol sorbitans, polyethylene glycol monoalkyl ethers, polypropylene glycol, polypropylene alginate, PPG-10 butanediol, PPG-10 methyl glucose ether, PPG-20 methyl glucose ether, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol dicaprylate, propylene glycol dicaprate, propylene glycol laurate; (ii) mixing the solution with the second solvent to define a pre-suspension of particles in a friable form; and (iii) adding energy to the pre-suspension to form particles having an average effective particle size of from about 400 nm to about 2 microns.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from provisional application serial No. 60/258,160 filed Dec. 22, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

US Referenced Citations (87)
Number Name Date Kind
4056635 Glen et al. Nov 1977 A
4073943 Wretlind et al. Feb 1978 A
4452817 Glen et al. Jun 1984 A
4540602 Motoyama et al. Sep 1985 A
4622219 Haynes Nov 1986 A
4725442 Haynes Feb 1988 A
4798846 Glen et al. Jan 1989 A
4973465 Baurain et al. Nov 1990 A
5023271 Vigne et al. Jun 1991 A
5078994 Nair et al. Jan 1992 A
5091187 Haynes Feb 1992 A
5091188 Haynes Feb 1992 A
5100591 Leclef et al. Mar 1992 A
5133908 Stainmesse et al. Jul 1992 A
5145684 Liversidge et al. Sep 1992 A
5152923 Weder et al. Oct 1992 A
5188837 Domb Feb 1993 A
5246707 Haynes Sep 1993 A
5250236 Gasco Oct 1993 A
5298262 Na et al. Mar 1994 A
5302401 Liversidge et al. Apr 1994 A
5326552 Na et al. Jul 1994 A
5336507 Na et al. Aug 1994 A
5340564 Illig et al. Aug 1994 A
5346702 Na et al. Sep 1994 A
5352459 Hollister et al. Oct 1994 A
5389263 Gallagher et al. Feb 1995 A
5399363 Liversidge et al. Mar 1995 A
5429824 June Jul 1995 A
5447710 Na et al. Sep 1995 A
5470583 Na et al. Nov 1995 A
5494683 Liversidge et al. Feb 1996 A
5510118 Bosch et al. Apr 1996 A
5518738 Eickhoff et al. May 1996 A
5534270 De Castro Jul 1996 A
5543133 Swanson et al. Aug 1996 A
5552160 Liversidge et al. Sep 1996 A
5560933 Soon-Shiong et al. Oct 1996 A
5565383 Sakai Oct 1996 A
5569448 Wong et al. Oct 1996 A
5573783 Desieno et al. Nov 1996 A
5578325 Domb et al. Nov 1996 A
5580579 Ruddy et al. Dec 1996 A
5587143 Wong Dec 1996 A
5641515 Ramtoola Jun 1997 A
5660858 Parikh et al. Aug 1997 A
5662883 Bagchi et al. Sep 1997 A
5662932 Anselem et al. Sep 1997 A
5665331 Bagchi et al. Sep 1997 A
5716642 Bagchi et al. Feb 1998 A
5766635 Spenleuhauer et al. Jun 1998 A
5833891 Subramaniam et al. Nov 1998 A
5858410 Muller et al. Jan 1999 A
5874111 Maitra et al. Feb 1999 A
5916596 Desai et al. Jun 1999 A
5922355 Parikh et al. Jul 1999 A
6007845 Domb et al. Dec 1999 A
6045829 Liversidge et al. Apr 2000 A
6048550 Chan et al. Apr 2000 A
6063910 Debenedetti et al. May 2000 A
6068858 Liversidge et al. May 2000 A
6086376 Moussa et al. Jul 2000 A
6090925 Woiszwillo et al. Jul 2000 A
6090983 Yokoyama et al. Jul 2000 A
6132750 Perrier et al. Oct 2000 A
6143211 Mathiowitz et al. Nov 2000 A
6146663 Bissery et al. Nov 2000 A
6153225 Lee et al. Nov 2000 A
6165506 Jain et al. Dec 2000 A
6177103 Pace et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197757 Perrier et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214384 Pallado et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217886 Onyuksel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221400 Liversidge et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228399 Parikh et al. May 2001 B1
6235224 Mathiowitz May 2001 B1
6238677 Fanta et al. May 2001 B1
6238694 Gasco May 2001 B1
6245349 Yiv et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248363 Patel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264922 Wood et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267989 Liversidge Jul 2001 B1
6268053 Woiszwillo et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270806 Liversidge et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294204 Rossling et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299906 Bausch et al. Oct 2001 B1
6337092 Khan et al. Jan 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
0535534 Apr 1993 EP
0577215 May 1994 EP
0600532 Jun 1994 EP
0601618 Jun 1994 EP
0601619 Jun 1994 EP
0602700 Jun 1994 EP
0602702 Jun 1994 EP
0605024 Jul 1994 EP
0498482 Sep 1999 EP
0499299 Aug 2000 EP
0517565 Oct 2000 EP
0808154 Dec 2000 EP
0754034 Jul 2001 EP
0804162 Sep 2001 EP
WO 9015593 Dec 1990 WO
WO 9325190 Dec 1993 WO
WO 9527482 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9600567 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9624336 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9624340 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9625150 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9625152 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9625918 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9631231 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9714407 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9730695 Aug 1997 WO
WO 9736611 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9807410 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9807414 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9814174 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9900113 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9902665 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9903450 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9929316 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9938493 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9949846 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9949848 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9961001 Dec 1999 WO
WO 9965469 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0009096 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0012124 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0012125 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0018374 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0027363 May 2000 WO
WO 0030615 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0030616 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0040220 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0051572 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0117546 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0126635 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0180828 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0187264 Nov 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
US 5,849,884, 12/1998, Woiszwillo et al. (withdrawn)
B. Sjostrom et al., Preparation Of Submicron Drug Particles In Lecithin-Stabilized O/W Emulsions I. Model Studies Of The Precipitation Of Cholesteryl Acetate, Int. J. Pharm., 88 (1992) pp. 53-62.
B. Sjostrom et al., A Method For The Preparation Of Submicron Particles Of Sparingly Water-Soluble Drugs By Precipitation In Oil-In-Water Emulsions. II: Influence Of The Emulsifier, The Solvent And The Drug Substance, J. Pharm. Sci., 82(6), (1992) pp. 584-589.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/258160 Dec 2000 US