The present invention generally pertains to microsurgical probes and more particularly to ophthalmic microsurgical probes such as vitrectomy probes.
Posterior segment ophthalmic surgical procedures generally require the cutting and/or removal of the vitreous humor, a transparent jelly-like material that fills the posterior segment of the eye. The vitreous humor, or vitreous, is composed of numerous microscopic fibers that are often attached to the retina. Therefore, cutting and removal of the vitreous must be done with great care to avoid traction on the retina, the separation of the retina from the choroid, a retinal tear, or, in the worst case, cutting and removal of the retina itself.
The use of microsurgical cutting probes in posterior segment ophthalmic surgery is well known. Such vitrectomy probes are typically inserted via an incision in the sclera near the pars plana. The surgeon may also insert other microsurgical instruments such as a fiber optic illuminator, an infusion cannula, or an aspiration probe during the posterior segment surgery. The surgeon performs the procedure while viewing the eye under a microscope.
Conventional vitrectomy probes typically include a hollow outer cutting member, a hollow inner cutting member arranged coaxially with and movably disposed within the hollow outer cutting member, and a port extending radially through the outer cutting member near the distal end thereof. Vitreous humor is aspirated into the open port, and the inner member is actuated, closing the port. Upon the closing of the port, cutting surfaces on both the inner and outer cutting members cooperate to cut the vitreous, and the cut vitreous is then aspirated away through the inner cutting member. U.S. Pat. No. 4,577,629 (Martinez); U.S. Pat. No. 5,019,035 (Missirlian et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,249 (Akkas et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,628 (Charles et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,008 (de Juan et al.); 4,696,298 (Higgins et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,297 (Wang) all disclose various types of vitrectomy probes, and each of these patents is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
During posterior segment ophthalmic surgery, it is generally desirable to remove as much of the overlying vitreous as possible prior to any procedure to repair the underlying retina. However, a surgeon is limited in how close to the retina he or she can dispose a conventional vitrectomy probe due to the geometry of the probe tip and the cutting port. Therefore, a need continues to exist for an improved vitrectomy probe that does not suffer from the above-described limitations.
One aspect of the present invention is a microsurgical probe. The probe comprises a tubular body having an inner bore, a port providing access to the inner bore, and a closed distal tip. The distal tip has a flat inner surface.
Another aspect of the present invention is a first method of forming a microsurgical probe. A tubular needle is disposed within a collet. The collet and the needle are rotated at high speed. A tool having a generally flat distal surface with a spherical projection thereon is provided. An edge of a distal end of the needle is contacted with the spherical projection. The tool is moved across the distal end of the needle from the edge to slightly past a centerline of the needle so that the distal end of the needle is formed into a closed distal tip having a flat outer surface and a flat inner surface.
Another aspect of the present invention is a second method of forming a microsurgical probe. A distal end of a tubular needle is disposed in contact with a sheet of foil. A compressive force is imparted to the needle and the foil. An electrical impulse is sent between the needle and the foil so that the foil is welded to the needle. The needle is disposed in a punch die, and the needle is punched through the foil so that a closed distal tip having a flat outer surface and a flat inner surface is formed.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The preferred embodiments of the present invention and their advantages are best understood by referring to
Distal tip 30 has a convex, spherical outer surface 34 and a concave, spherical inner surface 36. Distal tip 30 is manufactured using a conventional spin forming process. In conventional spin forming, tubular needle stock is rotated and a tool having a generally concave distal end is brought into contact with the end of the needle. The force of the tool on the rotating needle closes the end of the tube and creates a distal tip 30 having a spherical geometry.
Distal tip 30a has a flat outer surface 42 and a convex, spherical inner surface 44. Distal tip 30a is manufactured using a conventional bead (or TIG) welding process. In conventional bead welding, an electrode is placed above the end of tubular needle stock and an electric current is passed between the needle and the electrode. A bead of material is formed on the needle end, creating a closed distal tip 30a having a spherical geometry. Secondary machining operations are performed on outer surface 42 to make it flat. However, inner surface 44 retains a convex, spherical shape because the inside weld flash is difficult to control.
As is explained in greater detail hereinbelow, flat outer surface 16a and flat inner surface 16b are preferably formed using an improved spin forming process, or a resistance welding process. Flat outer surface 16a and flat inner surface 16b result in distal end 18a of port 18 being a smaller distance 20 from outer surface 16a than compared to the distance 40 between distal end 38 of port 32 and outer surface 34 of conventional probe 22, or the distance 48 between distal end 46 of port 32 and outer surface 42 of conventional probe 24. Flat inner surface 16b also allows distal end 18a of port 18 to be disposed in a nearly coplanar arrangement with inner surface 16b. In contrast, distal end 38 of port 32 of conventional probe 22 is offset from its inner surface 36 due to the concave, spherical geometry of inner surface 36. Similarly, distal end 46 of port 32 of conventional probe 24 is offset from its inner surface 44 due to the uncertain tolerances of the inside weld flash in the bead welding process. Distance 20 is preferably about 0.006 inches to about 0.016 inches, and is most preferably about 0.006 inches to about 0.011 inches. Distal end 18a of port 18 is preferably disposed about 0.003 inches to about 0.005 inches from inner surface 16b. By minimizing distance 20, a surgeon may dispose probe 10 closer to the retina without contacting the retina. Thus, with probe 10 the surgeon may remove more of the overlying vitreous before performing a procedure to repair the underlying retina than with conventional probes 22 or 24.
From the above, it may be appreciated that the present invention provides improved apparatus and methods of performing vitrectomy surgery. The present invention is illustrated herein by example, and various modifications may be made by a person of ordinary skill in the art. For example, although the present invention is described herein in connection with a vitrectomy probe, it is applicable to other ophthalmic microsurgical probes and non-ophthalmic micrsosurgical probes. As another example, although the present invention is described herein in connection with a cutting probe, it is also applicable to an aspiration probe.
It is believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description. While the apparatus and methods shown or described above have been characterized as being preferred, various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/725,526 filed Oct. 11, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1815275 | Sadler | Jul 1931 | A |
2408596 | Bednar et al. | Oct 1946 | A |
2434737 | Enghauser | Jan 1948 | A |
2848804 | Graves et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
3793863 | Groppini | Feb 1974 | A |
3884238 | O'Malley et al. | May 1975 | A |
4493698 | Wang et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4577629 | Martinez | Mar 1986 | A |
4696298 | Higgins et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4757814 | Wang et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4819635 | Shapiro | Apr 1989 | A |
4841984 | Armeniades et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4909249 | Akkas et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4940468 | Petillo | Jul 1990 | A |
4986827 | Akkas et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5019035 | Missirlian et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020535 | Parker et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024652 | Dumenek et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5047008 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059204 | Lawson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061238 | Shuler | Oct 1991 | A |
5085131 | Barrett et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5176628 | Charles et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5235837 | Werner | Aug 1993 | A |
5284472 | Sussman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5354268 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5380280 | Peterson | Jan 1995 | A |
5423844 | Miller | Jun 1995 | A |
5474532 | Steppe | Dec 1995 | A |
5487725 | Peyman | Jan 1996 | A |
5520652 | Peterson | May 1996 | A |
5630827 | Vijfvinkel | May 1997 | A |
5674194 | Jung et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5718139 | Gardner | Feb 1998 | A |
5733297 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
5782849 | Miller | Jul 1998 | A |
5833643 | Ross et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845527 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5893862 | Pratt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6010496 | Appelbaum et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6488695 | Hickingbotham | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514268 | Finlay et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6575990 | Wang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6773445 | Finlay et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020161398 | Hickingbotham | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030078609 | Finlay et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050135776 | Vijfvinkel | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01010494 | Feb 2001 | WO |
02058607 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070093793 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60725526 | Oct 2005 | US |