The present disclosure relates to microwavable bags.
Embodiments of microwavable bags for use with liquid oil, as well as methods for manufacturing the same, are disclosed. Particular features of various embodiments are disclosed herein and are recited in the appended claims, which are hereby incorporated by reference into this summary section.
The drawings are not necessarily to scale and thus, in some instances, layer thicknesses or other sizes may be exaggerated or otherwise altered.
Certain bags configured for use in heating food in a microwave oven can be particularly well-suited for popping popcorn. Microwavable popcorn bags are often formed from laminates that comprise two paper plies, and the laminates may be treated with a chemical barrier or a film former to provide the bags with grease resistance. The bags generally store a mixture of unpopped popcorn kernels and fats. The fats are solid at room temperature, as well as at elevated temperatures experienced during packaging and/or transport of the bags, and often include trans fats and/or hydrogenated oils. The bags are generally sealed via heat seals. Although the heat seals may adequately prevent solid fats from exiting the bags, the seals are not capable of preventing the escape of liquid oils.
Certain embodiments of microwavable bags disclosed herein are advantageously configured to retain liquid oils, such as, for example, oils that are free or substantially free of trans fat and/or oils that are in a liquid state at room temperature. In some embodiments, the microwavable bags include a body material that comprises one or more paper plies. The microwavable bags can have a pinch bottom closure in which portions of one or more gussets are sealed between a front wall and a rear wall of the bag. The pinch bottom closure can be sealed via a cold seal adhesive, which can prevent liquid oil from exiting the bag via the closure.
With reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, as shown in
In other embodiments, the body material 110 can comprise other structures and compositions. For example, more or fewer paper plies and/or layers of other materials may be included in the laminate. Examples of suitable body materials 110 and coatings are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/843,760, which was filed on May 12, 2004 and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/008736 on Jan. 13, 2005. The portions of the foregoing application that relate to the structure and composition of body materials are hereby incorporated by reference herein as non-limiting examples.
With reference again to
The front wall 130 can comprise a left panel 130a and a right panel 130b that are joined to each other via a seam 152. In the illustrated embodiment, the seam 152 extends longitudinally from the upper end 122 to the lower end 124 of the tube 120. The seam 152 can comprise any suitable seal, such as, for example, a lap seal or a fin seal, and can be configured to prevent liquid oil from passing through the seal.
As further discussed below, the tube 120 can comprise a seal or a seam 154 at the upper end 122 and a seal or seam 156 at the lower end 124. Each seam 154, 156 can be configured to prevent liquid oil from passing through it. For example, a food product, such as unpopped popcorn kernels and oil or fats having a relatively low melting point, can be received within the interior cavity 150 of the tube 120 and sealed therein via the seams 154, 156, and each seam 154, 156 can prevent the liquid oil from exiting the interior cavity 150 via the upper and lower ends 122, 124 of the tube 120, respectively.
With continued reference to
The cold seal adhesive 160 can be applied to the body material 110 in any suitable fashion. For example, in some embodiments, a flexographic technique may be used in which the cold seal adhesive 160 is applied to the body material 110 via photopolymer plates. The cold seal adhesive 160 can be transferred to the body material 110 in a wet state and allowed to dry. In other embodiments, a rotogravure style press may be used to apply the cold seal adhesive 160 to the body material 110.
A cold seal adhesive 162 can be disposed at or near a bottom edge of the body material 110, and can extend substantially continuously between an edge of the left panel 130a and an edge of the right panel 130b. In the illustrated embodiment, sections 162a, 162b, 162c, 162d, 162e, 162f, and 162g of the cold seal adhesive 162 cover the bottom edges of the left panel 130a, the front panel 134a, the back panel 134b, the back wall 132, the back panel 136b, the front panel 136a, and the right panel 130b, respectively. The cold seal adhesive 162 can be applied to the body material 110 in any of the manners described above with respect to the adhesive 160.
In some embodiments, the amount of cold seal adhesive 160, 162 applied to the body material 110 can be greater than the amount of heat seal adhesive used for bags of comparable capacity. For example, for some bags, a heat seal adhesive for closing both ends of a bag is used in an amount of from about 3 pounds to about 3.5 pounds per ream, when dry, or from about 6 pounds to about 7 pounds per ream when wet. In contrast, in various embodiments of bags configured to retain liquid oil, the amount of cold seal adhesive 162 applied to the body material 110 for sealing both ends of a bag 100 can be in a range of from about 8 pounds to about 12 pounds or can be no less than about 8 pounds, no less than about 9 pounds, no less than about 10 pounds, no less than 11 pounds, or no less than about 12 pounds per ream when the cold seal adhesive 162 is dry. The amount of cold seal adhesive 162 can be in a range of from about 16 pounds to about 24 pounds or can be no less than about 16 pounds, no less than about 18 pounds, no less than about 20 pounds, no less than about 22 pounds, or no less than about 24 pounds per ream when wet.
Cold seal adhesives are generally configured to form a seal when separate portions of the adhesive are brought into contact with each other and pressure is applied. Unlike heat seal adhesives, cold seal adhesives can create the seal without the additional application of heat. However, as discussed below, it can be desirable to heat the cold seal adhesive when forming a seal in some instances. A variety of existing cold seal adhesives can be used or readily modified for use with embodiments of the bag 100. For example, cold seal adhesives produced by Ashland Inc. of Covington, Ky.; H.B. Fuller Co. of Vadnais Heights, Minnesota; Henkel Corporation of Rocky Hill, Conn.; and Rohm and Haas Company of Philadelphia, Pa. may be used or modified.
Cold seal adhesives can include an adhesive component combined with an elastomer. The adhesive component can comprise, for example, one or more of vinyl acetate polymers and copolymers and acrylic polymers. The elastomer can comprise one or more of natural rubber latex and synthetic elastomers, such as, for example, styrene butadiene rubber, polycholroprene, and butyl rubber.
Cold seal adhesives can have “hard” or “soft” characteristics. Hard cold seal adhesives are generally less tacky and can require greater pressure to create a seal, as compared with soft cold seal adhesives. In some embodiments, a balance between the features of hard and soft varieties of cold seal adhesives can be desirable. For example, in some instances, the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 are applied and the lower seam 156 is sealed at a first manufacturing facility. However, the upper seam 154 may be sealed at a second facility after a food product has been introduced into the semi-formed bag 100. In such instances, it may be desirable for the cold seal adhesive 160 to be relatively hard to prevent premature formation of the upper seam 154 during transport of the semi-formed bag 100 from the first facility to the second facility. In other instances, it can be desirable for the cold seal adhesive 160 to be relatively soft. This may allow for simpler application of the cold seal adhesive 160 to the bag material 110 (which may result from better deformation properties of soft adhesives) and/or quicker or easier formation of the seal (which may result from the tackier properties of soft adhesives). In some embodiments, it can be desirable for one or both of the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 to have hard characteristics at relatively low temperatures (e.g., room temperature) and to behave in a softer manner at elevated temperatures (e.g., about 100 degrees Fahrenheit to about 250 degrees Fahrenheit) such that the adhesives 160, 162 can be resistant to prematurely forming a seal 154, 156 during storage, transport, and/or early stages of conversion, but may readily form the seal 154, 156 upon application of heat and pressure at a desired stage of a conversion process or other bag sealing process.
In some embodiments, one or both of the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 are relatively resistant to blocking. A variety of tests are available to determine the blocking resistance of a cold seal adhesive 160, 162. For example, in some embodiments, the ASTM D918 Standard Test for Blocking Resistance of Paper and Paperboard, as this test is understood by those skilled in the art, may be used to characterize the blocking resistance. In further embodiments, it can be possible to use a test similar to ASTM D918, but with altered testing conditions (e.g., altered environmental temperatures and humidity, increased pressures applied to the samples, shorter dwell times, etc.) to more closely simulate actual conditions to which the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 may be exposed during conversion and/or transport. For example, rather than operating at 140 degrees Fahrenheit and applying a pressure of 1 psi to test specimens for 24 hours, lower temperatures (e.g., room temperature), higher pressures, and/or shorter dwell times may be employed.
The blocking resistance of some embodiments of the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 can be tested using specialized equipment, such as a Kohler Block Tester. Such a test can be conducted on test specimens or test samples in a manner resembling that set forth in ASTM D918. The test can include providing ten or more two-inch by two-inch samples of a body material 110 that has a cold seal adhesive 160, 162 disposed thereon. The samples are divided into sets of two, with the cold seal adhesive portions of the samples placed in contact with each other. Three-inch by two-inch foil sheets can be provided for use as interleaving sheets that are placed between adjacent sets of samples. The sets of samples are stacked on top of each other, with one sheet of foil between adjacent sample sets. The stacked samples are then placed on the bottom plate of a Kohler Block Tester. A centering plate of the Kohler Block Tester is placed over the samples, and then an appropriate spring is selected to provide the desired pressure to the samples. Examples of springs that may be used include those listed in the following table (Table 1), which identifies the serial number of the spring for use with a Kohler Block Tester and the loads each spring can provide:
1 lb.-15 lbs.
1 lb.-15 lbs.
1 lb.-15 lbs.
With the desired spring in place and the centering plate in position, pressure is applied to the stack of samples by turning a pressure screw to the predetermined distance to achieve the desired pressure via the spring. The samples are left under the desired pressure conditions for the desired amount of time and under the desired environmental conditions. After the desired time has elapsed, the pressure is released from the sets of samples and the interleaving foil sheets are removed. Where an elevated temperature has been used for an environmental simulation, the sample sets can be allowed to cool. The samples are then separated from each other, and their resistance to blocking is evaluated. A rating or description of the blocking can be provided according to the following table (Table 2):
A cold seal adhesive 160, 162 can be tested for dynamic loading conditions, such as may be experienced during or between stages of a converting process that precede a seam-forming stage (e.g., pinching that may occur as a web of body material 110 is fed through a converter). In one such test, the pressure is maintained for a dwell time of 1 second, the ambient temperature is maintained at 73 degrees Fahrenheit, and the relative humidity of the testing environment is maintained at 50%. Under these conditions, various embodiments of the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 can withstand loading pressures within a range of from about 100 psi to about 436 psi, of no more than about 100 psi, no more than about 150 psi, no more than about 200 psi, no more than about 250 psi, no more than about 300 psi, no more than about 350 psi, no more than about 400 psi, or no more than about 436 psi, no less than about 100 psi, no less than about 200 psi, no less than about 300 psi, or no less than about 400 psi with no more than “slight blocking” (i.e., with a blocking rating of 0, 1, or 2, as defined in Table 2). Certain of such embodiments can be advantageous, as it is believed that blocking either will not be encountered or will not pose significant difficulties during conversion of the bags under normal handling conditions prior to the desired sealing of such bags 100 using elevated temperatures.
A cold seal adhesive 160, 162 can be tested for static loading conditions, such as may be experienced during storage or transport of the body material 110 or the bags 100. For example, the cold seal adhesive 160, 162 may be applied to a web of the body material 110 that is subsequently rolled upon itself prior to its conversion of the into bags 100. As another example, a bag 100 may be only partially formed during the conversion, with one end thereof having a cold seal adhesive 160, 162 applied thereto but not yet sealed shut, and it thus can be desirable for this bag end to remain open until the bag 100 is filled with a desired product. In one test simulating storage and/or transport conditions, the pressure is maintained for a dwell time of 10 seconds, the ambient temperature is maintained at 130 degrees Fahrenheit, and the relative humidity of the testing environment is maintained at 50%. Under these conditions, various embodiments of the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 can withstand loading pressures within a range of from about 100 psi to about 436 psi, of no more than about 100 psi, no more than about 150 psi, no more than about 200 psi, no more than about 250 psi, no more than about 300 psi, no more than about 350 psi, no more than about 400 psi, or no more than about 436 psi, no less than about 100 psi, no less than about 200 psi, no less than about 300 psi, or no less than about 400 psi with no more than “slight blocking” (i.e., with a blocking rating of 0, 1, or 2, as defined in Table 2). Certain of such embodiments can be advantageous, as it is believed that blocking either will not be encountered or will not pose significant difficulties during conversion of the bags under normal handling conditions prior to the desired sealing of such bags 100 using elevated temperatures.
In some embodiments, the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 comprise the same composition (e.g., the adhesives are substantially the same), and in other embodiments, the cold seal adhesives 160, 162 have different compositions. For example, in some embodiments, the adhesive 160 may be harder than the cold seal adhesive 162.
With continued reference to
With reference to
The resulting bond can be sufficiently strong to maintain the bag 100 in a closed orientation during the final stages of manufacture and subsequent transport. However, the bond can also be configured to weaken or release upon heating the bag 100 and/or the contents thereof. For example, heating the bag can raise the temperature of the adhesive 164, and steam from the contents of the bag 100 likewise can raise the temperature of the adhesive 164. Sufficient pressure from steam within the heated bag 100 can cause at least a portion of the adhesive 164 to separate from a wall of the bag 100 so as to permit venting of the steam. The bond can also be configured to permit relative easy opening of the bag 100 to allow access to its contents.
With reference to
The step-down area can include a gap or a channel 170, which can be at least partially defined by the crease 142 of the side wall 136 and by the front and back walls 130, 132. As shown in
As mentioned above, previously known microwavable popcorn bags having a pinch-bottom closure are not suitable for retaining liquid oil. The Applicants have discovered that at least one reason for this unsuitability is that the channels 170 of these bags are not adequately obstructed. Rather, the channels 170 remain sufficiently open to permit liquid oil to pass through them.
With continued reference to
A food product can be introduced into the bag 100 prior to sealing the upper seam 154. In the embodiment illustrated in
After introduction of the food product into the bag 100, the upper seam 154 can be sealed. Referring again to
In other embodiments, one or more of the amounts or weights of adhesives used, sealing pressures, and sealing dwell times discussed above with respect to the lower seam 156 may be different for each seam 154, 156. For example, in some embodiments, the bond strength for one of the seams 154, 156 is lower than it is for the other seam 154, 156, which may facilitate opening of the bag 100 to access the cooked contents of the bag 100. In some embodiments, one of the seams 154, 156 can include a crimp seal (not shown), while the other seam 154, 156 does not include a crimp seal. In certain of such embodiments, the seam 154, 156 that is not crimp sealed can be at the end of a bag 100 that is intended for opening by a consumer, whereas the crimp sealed seam 154, 156 does include a crimp seal such that the crimp sealed end of the bag 100 is more difficult to open. Creation of a crimp sealed seam can involve, for example, application of a different amount of pressure to the seam 154, 156.
As shown in
It will be understood by those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the present invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims. Recitation in the claims of the term “first” with respect to a feature or element does not necessarily imply the existence of a second or additional such feature or element.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2870954 | Kulesza | Jan 1959 | A |
2997224 | Stannard | Aug 1961 | A |
3567111 | Baxter | Mar 1971 | A |
3570748 | Coyle et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3628720 | Schmedding | Dec 1971 | A |
3687356 | Goodrich et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3784085 | Kilgore | Jan 1974 | A |
3900670 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3910488 | Goodrich | Oct 1975 | A |
3924013 | Kane | Dec 1975 | A |
3927825 | Stearley | Dec 1975 | A |
3939025 | Kane | Feb 1976 | A |
3966115 | Hollis | Jun 1976 | A |
3967998 | Kane | Jul 1976 | A |
4008850 | Goodrich | Feb 1977 | A |
4088264 | Vogt | May 1978 | A |
4096309 | Stillman | Jun 1978 | A |
4147291 | Akao et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4387126 | Rebholz | Jun 1983 | A |
4493127 | Blanke, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4515273 | Jacobson et al. | May 1985 | A |
4521910 | Keppel et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4705707 | Winter | Nov 1987 | A |
4716061 | Winter | Dec 1987 | A |
4743123 | Legters et al. | May 1988 | A |
4753832 | Brown et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4797010 | Coelho | Jan 1989 | A |
4806398 | Martin | Feb 1989 | A |
4808421 | Mendenhall et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4894264 | Akao et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904093 | Woods et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4930906 | Hemphill | Jun 1990 | A |
4946289 | Bolling et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949529 | Davis | Aug 1990 | A |
4952441 | Bose et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4971454 | Branson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994324 | Bose et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007233 | Bose | Apr 1991 | A |
5038009 | Babbitt | Aug 1991 | A |
5051284 | Johansson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5073421 | Akao | Dec 1991 | A |
5091228 | Fujii et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5097956 | Davis | Mar 1992 | A |
5171594 | Babbitt | Dec 1992 | A |
5225256 | Marano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244702 | Finestone et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5273361 | Jillson | Dec 1993 | A |
5281027 | Thrall | Jan 1994 | A |
5302427 | Murschall et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5310587 | Akahori et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330845 | Andersson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332586 | Di Mino | Jul 1994 | A |
5342662 | Aoyama et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345399 | Collins | Sep 1994 | A |
5376392 | Ikegami et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399022 | Sheets | Mar 1995 | A |
5405663 | Archibald et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415910 | Knauf | May 1995 | A |
5470594 | Di Mino | Nov 1995 | A |
5482376 | Moseley et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488220 | Freerks et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512338 | Bianchini et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520464 | Kristola | May 1996 | A |
5520970 | Christensson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529396 | Pryor et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536542 | Gillespie et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553942 | Domke et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558438 | Warr | Sep 1996 | A |
5560296 | Adams | Oct 1996 | A |
5560945 | Geddes et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5593229 | Warr | Jan 1997 | A |
5601369 | Moseley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604042 | Bianchini et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611626 | Warr | Mar 1997 | A |
5659933 | McWilliams | Aug 1997 | A |
5728037 | Pryor et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5770839 | Ruebush et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5814382 | Yannuzzi, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5851608 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871790 | Monier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876815 | Sandstrom et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
RE36177 | Rouyer et al. | Apr 1999 | E |
5902046 | Shibata | May 1999 | A |
5912070 | Miharu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6003670 | Beer | Dec 1999 | A |
6019713 | Scypinski et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046443 | Ackerman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060095 | Scrimager | May 2000 | A |
6065871 | Warr | May 2000 | A |
6071576 | Bentmar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6137098 | Moseley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187396 | Möller | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213644 | Henderson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231232 | Warr | May 2001 | B1 |
6248442 | Kong et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6299351 | Warr | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333086 | Ora et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346332 | Bryden et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6367976 | Bannister | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372317 | Denney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374461 | Gober et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375981 | Gilleland et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402379 | Albright | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436547 | Toft et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6479137 | Joyner | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500505 | Piper et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509105 | Olvey | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6528088 | Gilleland et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534137 | Vadhar | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6565936 | Peiffer et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576304 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579580 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589384 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609999 | Albright | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623162 | Pang | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652984 | Finestone et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673465 | Lordi | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6715919 | Hiraiwa et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746736 | Leeper et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767600 | Kasahara | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6797395 | Finestone et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6855387 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858313 | Musco et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6883964 | Beaulieu | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887538 | Denney et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893686 | Egan | May 2005 | B2 |
6919111 | Swoboda et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921563 | Goerlitz et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926951 | Huffer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926968 | Lordi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964797 | Salste et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974612 | Frisk et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7090904 | Hartzell et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7147913 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157126 | Cosentino et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7459214 | Olofsson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476441 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20030229168 | Borsinger et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040038792 | Albright | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052987 | Shetty et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091648 | Hartzell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105600 | Floyd, Jr. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040105942 | Cable | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136616 | Allen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137206 | Pettis | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175060 | Woodham et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191438 | Cosentino et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217112 | Monforton et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228547 | Hartzell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050008736 | Egan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050084185 | Moon | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100252 | Rivlin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112305 | Swoboda et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050191399 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230384 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060073292 | Hartzell et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070042146 | Sharp | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047852 | Sharp et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047853 | Sharp et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080070047 | Rehkugler et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078759 | Wnek et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080166457 | Gorman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080268106 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090045189 | Cormier et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20120085754 | Mir | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0148436 | May 1981 | DE |
0822063 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2256660 | Jul 1975 | FR |
2847232 | Nov 2002 | FR |
1462941 | Jan 1977 | GB |
2351039 | Dec 2000 | GB |
6806715 | Jul 1968 | NL |
WO 0053429 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0194451 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03064167 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2008045467 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Publication dated Dec. 31, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,151. |
Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Graphic Packaging International, Graphic Packaging Expands Microrite® Line with New Oil-Absorbent Sleeve for Beckers in Europe (Nov. 30, 2005), available at http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=103159&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=791279&highlight=. |
“While Bags Take a Beating from China, Bemis Offers a New Poly/Plastic Hybrid Solution,” Packaging Strategies, vol. 26, No. 16, p. 4 (Sep. 15, 2008). |
“Mulilayer Kraft Paper Bag for Food Products,” DD-148-436, 1 page (May 1981). (DL-1981-05). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued Mar. 18, 2008 in International Application No. PCT/US06/031690. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Apr. 21, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Response to the Restriction/Election dated May 21, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Response to the Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Terminal Disclaimers and 3,73(b) Statement dated Nov. 24, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 12, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Request for Continued Examination submitted with a Response to the Office Action and a Rule 131 Declaration dated May 6, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Draft Claims for an In-Person Interview dated Oct. 5, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Response to the Office Action with an Appendix dated Oct. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 22, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/240,944. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated May 12, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Response to the Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Jun. 12, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Response to the Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Terminal Disclaimers and 3.73(b) Statement dated Nov. 21, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 12, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Request for Continued Examination submitted with a Response to the Office Action and a Rule 131 Declaration dated May 7, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Draft Claims for an In-Person Interview dated Oct. 5, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Response to the Office Action with an Appendix dated Oct. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,419. |
Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Response to the Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Terminal Disclaimers and 3.73(b) Statement dated Nov. 24, 2008 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Request for Continued Examination submitted with a Response to the Office Action and a Rule 131 Declaration dated May 4, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Draft Claims for an In-Person Interview dated Oct. 5, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Response to the Office Action with an Appendix dated Oct. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 21, 2009 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,434. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/341,080, titled Multi-Layer Bags and Methods of Manufacturing the Same, filed Dec. 22, 2008. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/335,414, titled Multi-Layer Bags and Methods of Manufacturing the Same, filed Dec. 15, 2008. |
European Search Report dated Oct. 23, 2009. |
Bentley, David J., Jr., “About Cold Seal Adhesives”, Paper Film and Foil Converter, 2 pgs., Jan. 2006. |
Smith, Nancy, “Cold Seal Adhesives”, Rhom & Haas company, Aimcal Conference, 6 pgs., 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110089168 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |