This is a national stage of PCT/SE07/000918 filed Oct. 18, 2007 and published in English, which has a priority of Sweden no. 0602197-6 filed Oct. 19, 2006, hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a radiation absorber in the microwave field. It is known to coat surfaces reflecting radar radiation with different types of radar absorber. Most radar absorbers currently have a layer structure. There are those using one or more thin resistive sheets with an appropriate surface resistance. Prior art absorbers of this type are Salisbury screens, Jaumann absorbers and single foil layers.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A Salisbury screen consists of a resistive sheet which is placed at a distance of a quarter of a wavelength from a metal surface. The resistive sheet has the same surface resistance as the wave impedance in vacuum and the intermediate layer is a dielectric layer with the dielectric constant near 1. A Jaumann absorber is a combination of two or more Salisbury screens. A single foil layer consists of two dielectric layers with an intermediate resistive sheet. It is well known how the various prior art radar absorbers are to be built in respect of surface resistance of resistive sheets, relative dielectric constant of dielectric layers and thickness of the layers included for the radar absorber to function according to requirements.
The surface resistance of the resistive sheet, the relative dielectric constant of the distance material and the thickness of various layers are due to the frequency range in which the structure is optimised and the degree of reflection that is desired, that is due to the demands placed on the absorber. One example of a single foil layer optimised for the X and P band is illustrated in
Resistive sheets in radar absorbers that are currently used are often made of carbon fibre cloth or a plastic film with a thin lossy sheet. These materials function at room temperature and neighbouring temperatures. However, they cannot be used at significantly higher temperatures since they would then be destroyed. It is, however, very important to be able to produce a radar absorber which can be applied to hot surfaces, such as the outlet of a jet engine or a rocket engine. This has not been possible with prior art radar absorbers.
The present invention provides a solution to this problem by the invention being designed as described herein. Various advantageous embodiments of the invention are as described herein. The invention is, of course, also useful in traditional applications at lower temperatures.
The invention will in the following be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, on which
a shows an example of the structure of a single foil layer,
b is a diagram of the radiation absorbing ability of the single foil layer in
a illustrates a first test design of the invention,
b is a diagram of the radar absorbing ability of the embodiment of the invention shown in
a illustrates a second test design of the invention, and
b is a diagram of the radar absorbing ability of the embodiment of the invention shown in
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
In the invention, one starts, due to the application, from a radar absorber of some known type, in which the traditional resistive sheet or the traditional resistive sheets are replaced by sheets made of a MAX phase material. Such materials resist high temperatures, see the further discussion of these materials below. Moreover, dielectric layers included are made of a temperature resistant material with appropriate electrical properties. These materials are here referred to as low permittivity ceramics (relative dielectric constant ∈r<15), all materials that are inorganic and not metals being called ceramics.
This means that also different types of glass are included in the ceramics. There are those that resist high temperatures. In Table 1 below there are a few examples of low permittivity ceramics and their dielectric constant. Also ceramic composites, (particle, whiskers and fibre reinforced ceramic composites) can be used as dielectric layers provided they have an appropriate dielectric constant.
When needed, the dielectric constant of ceramics can be reduced by pores being introduced in the material. The dielectric constant can also be reduced by production of composites. For mullite, it is possible to produce, for example, composites of mullite and quartz glass or mullite and cordierite.
Regarding the resistive sheet, it is demonstrated in the following that a MAX phase material can, in terms of the electromagnetic properties, function in the same way as resistive sheets used up to now. When producing a radar absorber, a technique that is known from the radiation absorption point of view is therefore used, and a person skilled in the art calculates, in the traditional way, desirable electromagnetic properties of the layers included, based on requirements.
The special feature of the invention is the knowledge that MAX phase materials can be used for the resistive sheet. MAX phase materials have many good properties in the context, for instance they resist high temperatures.
MAX phase materials are materials that are defined by the formula Mn+1AXn. In the formula, M stands for a transition metal in the group consisting of scandium (Sc), titanium (Ti), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), zirconium (Zr), niobium (Nb), molybdenum (Mo), hafnium (Ht) and tantalum (Ta) or a combination of two or more transition metals from the group. A stands for elements in the group aluminium (Al), silicon (Si), phosphorus (P), sulphur (S), gallium (Ga), germanium (Ge), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), indium (In), tin (Sn), tallium (TI) and lead (Pb) or a combination of two or more elements in the group. X stands for carbon (C) and/or nitrogen (N).
In the formula for MAX phase materials, Mn+1AXn, n can be either 1, 2 or 3, which results in three groups of materials. The first group with n=1 is called the 211 group. The figures stand for number of atoms of each chemical element M, A and X, respectively. Table 2 below contains all currently known materials in the 211 group. The second group has n=2 and is called the 312 group. Three materials are known in the group, Ti3GeC2, Ti3AlC2 and Ti3SiC2. The third group has n=3 and is called the 413 group. This contains only one currently known material Ti4AlN3.
MAX phase materials have a special crystal structure which combines the best properties of the metals with the advantages of the ceramics. They have high electrical and thermal conductivity, low friction, very high resistance to wear and resist temperature shocks. The materials can be made by sintering or by PVD, Physical Vapour Deposition.
Since MAX phase materials have high conductivity and can resist extremely high temperatures, they can be used as a thin resistive sheet in a microwave absorber at high temperatures, above 1000° C., but, of course, also at room temperature and temperatures therebetween.
In order to fundamentally determine that MAX phase materials can function as a thin resistive sheet in a radar absorbing layer structure, a few thin coatings of titanium silicon carbide Ti3SiC2 were produced on a glass substrate using PVD. MAX phase materials from the 312 group are highly convenient for use in the present invention.
b and 3b are diagrams of measured reflection from the respective radar absorbers in free space in the frequency range 2-20 GHz at room temperature and Theoretically calculated reflection of the same structures. The diagrams demonstrate that the measured reflection very well matches the theoretically calculated values. This means that a resistive sheet made of Ti3SiC2 well serves its purpose in the respective radiation absorbing layer structures.
It is important to emphasise that the created layer structures are used only to verify that MAX phase materials can be used for the purpose in question. None of the layer structures was optimised in any way, which is noticed from the fact that reflection minima in
The surface resistance of the produced test coating of Ti3SiC2 was 338Ω/□ which is near the wave impedance of vacuum (=377Ω), which is advantageous for a Salisbury screen. The surface resistance of the sheet can be changed by choosing a suitable material, for instance another MAX phase material with different conductivity σ and/or choosing the thickness d of the sheet, since Ryt=1/σd.
In order to determine that MAX phase materials can function also at high temperatures as a thin resistive sheet in a radar absorber, a Salisbury screen-like sample was produced with quartz glass SiO2 as a substrate, which resists higher temperatures. In the same way as in the above-mentioned room temperature example, a thin coating of Ti3SiC2 was applied to the quartz glass substrate using PVD. Measurements performed on the sample demonstrate a good function with a distinct reflection minimum at least up to 200° C.
The invention being thus described, it will be apparent that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be recognized by one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0602197 | Oct 2006 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2007/000918 | 10/18/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/16/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/051140 | 5/2/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3938152 | Grimes et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4012738 | Wright | Mar 1977 | A |
4038660 | Connolly et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4084161 | Manning et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
5214432 | Kasevich et al. | May 1993 | A |
5537116 | Ishino et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5627541 | Haley et al. | May 1997 | A |
6043769 | Rowe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6756931 | Mukasa et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6867725 | Breeden et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7067203 | Joelsson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20040257260 | Breeden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 677 888 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1 378 304 | Jan 2004 | EP |
WO 2004091049 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100090879 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |