Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to microwave oven door seal configurations that are designed to reduce power leakage from microwave ovens. The concepts provided may find particular use on-board aircraft or other passenger transport vehicles that have various types of communication equipment that operate at a similar frequency as microwave ovens, and for which interference should be reduced or eliminated.
In microwave oven design, the ability to prevent microwave energy leakage can be a primary focus. First, leakage should be prevented in order to protect users from exposure to the microwave energy. Second, leakage should be prevented so as not to interfere with communication devices working in the same bands. For example, Wi-Fi and microwave oven manufacturers are required by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to operate within any of a finite number of allocated frequency bands. These bands may be referred to as ISM (industrial, scientific, and medical) radio bands. Based on a variety of factors, the band that makes the most sense for Wi-Fi and microwave ovens is the 2.4-2.5 GHz band. This means that the frequency of the microwave oven and the frequency of the LAN (local area network) communication use the same ISM band of 2.45 GHz. The electromagnetic noise generated from the microwave oven can create a potential interference with the wireless LAN communication Wi-Fi equipment, causing communication errors. The powerful emissions of microwave ovens can create electromagnetic interference that disrupts radio communications using the same frequency. This can be a particular problem on-board aircraft, where the need for internet services on-board has increased.
In an effort to provide compatibility between microwave ovens and communication devices operating within the same band, there have been attempts to contain the microwave power to a level that is low enough that it does not cause interference. The Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) document DO-160 provides emission limits (for all equipment, not specific to microwave ovens) that have been determined to ensure interference free operation between devices. The “Category M” limit is the strictest limit within the 2.4-2.5 GHz frequency range, and allows a field strength of only 68 dBuV/m at a one meter distance from the unit.
Microwave ovens are generally designed to meet a requirement for human safety, which has been defined internationally as a power density of less than 5 mW/cm2 at a distance of 5 cm from any point on the unit. That limit, if integrated around the door seal and translated to a one meter distance, and converted from power density to field strength exceeds the Category M limit by many orders of magnitude.
Measurements of typical microwave ovens confirm that units emitting a power density of less than 1% the maximum safety limit still emit enough power that the field strength at one meter greatly exceeds the Category M limit. In order to reduce the field strength emitted to a level below Category M requires a reduction in power leakage of at least about 50 dB, or 100,000 times.
One of the greatest sealing challenges for designing a microwave for aeronautical use (or other vehicle that should comply with Category M) is the microwave oven door seal. Microwave energy will not transmit through solid metal. However, the door must open and close for placement of food in the cavity. The working parts of the door and its required ease of use (e.g., it must be relatively easy for a user to open and close) add challenges to reducing power leakage by such a great amount.
Some attempted designs have failed because they require extreme door closure force. Such designs often use multiple conductive gaskets. The resulting force that is required to overcome the conductive gaskets is so great that to in order to close the door, power is required from the aircraft. Additionally, because of the door strength required by the high closure forces and because of the multiple, large conductive gaskets, door and the interface flange are heavy, which is undesirable in an aircraft application. Further, the effectiveness of conductive gaskets is dependent upon continuous, low resistance contact. The continuous contact can be rapidly degraded by contamination with food oils, grease, particles, dust, and so forth.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a microwave oven door seal that does not rely solely on conductive gaskets. It is also desirable to provide a microwave oven door seal that is lightweight and can be closed without aircraft power.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a multi-stage door seal 10. The components of the multi-stage door seal 10 include a choke seal 12, a single conductive seal 14, and one or more absorbent material stages 16. Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The door seal 24 may also include a microwave choke 12. The choke 12 is defined in part by a raised wall 46 on the door seal 24 and the base 42 of the door seal 24. As shown in
Referring back to the door seal 24 of
As shown in
An absorbent material stage 16 is also provided.
As shown in
The absorbent material stage 16 provides multiple absorbent material components 62 along a convoluted path. The general goal is that the absorbent material stage 16 helps absorb any energy that is not attenuated by the choke 12 or shorted out by the conductive gasket 14 (not shown in
In one example, the absorbent material may be formed of silicone, a natural or synthetic rubber, or any other carrier that can serve as a binder and/or carrier. A ferrite or ferromagnetic material may be embedded within the silicone binder. Any material that has the property to absorb the leakage of energy may be used. Non-limiting examples of materials include but are not limited to alnico, bismanol, chromium oxide, carbon, cobalt, dysprosium, fernico, ferrite (iron or magnet), gadolinium, heusler alloy, iron, magnetite, metglas, MKM steel, neodymium magnet, nickel, permalloy, rare-earth magnet, samarium-cobalt magnet, sendust, suessite, yttrium iron garnet, or any combination thereof.
The absorbent material may be formed as a ring-like gasket that can be wedged within each of the grooves described. The absorbent material gasket may be formed so that it does not extend the full height H of each U-shaped space formed by the grooves. This can allow each groove 38, 40 on the cavity seal 20 to receive a corresponding flange 54, 56 of the door seal 24. This can allow each groove 52, 58 on the door seal 24 to receive a corresponding wall 28, 32 of the cavity seal 20.
As the door 22 is moved from an open position to a closed position as shown in
Escaping power is forced to follow a path that causes it to meet the absorbent material at a low angle of incidence, which maximizes the effectiveness of the material. Additionally, the bends themselves provide some attenuation even without the absorbent material in place.
Similarly, the door seal 24′ has a choke 12′, a choke wall 74, an inner flange 76, and an outer flange 78. Door seal 24′ also has inner and outer grooves 80, 82. In this example, the flanges 76 and 78 are angled. This can allow the door opening to be smoother, without parts of seal portions 20′, 24′ bumping one another. In this example, the grooves 80, 82 are also angled. This can result in a pointed groove area.
As shown in
This example may provide an even tighter fit due to the angled features provided. Any escaping signal energy must traverse the walls, flanges, grooves, and absorbent material as outlined above. The energy strikes the features at low angles of incidence.
The seals 20, 24 of
The door seal 24″ may have a flange 92 with angled side walls, such that the flange 92 is received within the V-shape 90. The door seal 24″ may also have an absorbent gasket material 62 positioned such that it is compressed against second wall 88 upon closure of the door seal 24″ against the cavity seal 20″. Again, any escaping energy will be required to traverse the convoluted sequence of bends. Each bend helps reduce unwanted emissions. Each instance of an absorbent gasket material 62 helps reduce unwanted emissions.
In some aspects, the microwave seal may be provided according to one or more of the following examples.
A microwave oven door seal, comprising: a cavity seal and a door seal that cooperate with one another; an absorbent material stage comprising (a) the cavity seal comprising a first groove and a second groove, each of the first and second grooves comprising an absorbent material contained therein and (b) the door seal comprising inner groove and an outer groove, each of the inner grooves and outer grooves comprising an absorbent material contained therein.
A microwave oven door seal for an aircraft microwave, comprising: a cavity seal and a door seal that cooperate with one another; a choke seal; an conductive gasket seal; an absorbent material stage seal comprising (a) the cavity seal comprising a first groove and a second groove, each of the first and second grooves comprising an absorbent material of silicone and ferrite contained therein and (b) the door seal comprising inner groove and an outer groove, each of the inner grooves and outer grooves comprising an absorbent material of silicone and ferrite contained therein.
A microwave oven door seal, comprising: a cavity seal and a door seal that cooperate with one another; an absorbent material stage wherein the cavity seal and the door seal form a convoluted series of bends that force any escaping microwave energy to contact the bends at a low angle of incidence; wherein each of the bends comprises an absorbent material associated therewith.
Changes and modifications, additions and deletions may be made to the structures and methods recited above and shown in the drawings without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention and the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/898,569, filed Nov. 1, 2013, titled “Category M Microwave Oven Door Seal,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61898569 | Nov 2013 | US |