This application claims the benefit of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2016/052768 filed on Sep. 8, 2016, entitled “A MICROWAVE SWITCHED MULTIPLEXER AND A MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE INCLUDING SUCH A MULTIPLEXER,” which is incorporated by reference in its entirety in this disclosure.
The present invention relates to a microwave switched multiplexer. More particularly, but not exclusively, the present invention relates to a microwave switched multiplexer comprising a plurality of signal channels, each signal channel comprising an input resonator, a center resonator and then a switch, the two outputs of which are connected to transmit and receive channels, each of the transmit and receive channels comprising an output resonator, the two output resonators have the same admittances, the ratios of the admittances of the input, center and output resonators being in the ratio π/2:4x/π:π2, where x b in the range 0.9 to 1.1. In a further aspect the present invention relates to a mobile telecommunications device such as a mobile phone including such a multiplexer.
There are an increasing number of geographic specific microwave frequency bands used by mobile telecommunications systems. If a mobile telecommunications handset is to be used in a plurality of different geographical areas then the handset must to be able to selectively transmit and receive microwave signals in a plurality of different microwave frequency bands. The mobile handset can identify the transmit and receive signal bands used by the telecommunications system covering its current location and then transmit and receive in those bands.
Conventional handsets typically comprise a plurality of diplexers, each corresponding to a frequency band. The antenna or transmitter is connected to the appropriate diplexer (or diplexers) if the handset wishes to transmit or receive in a particular signal band.
Such an arrangement has a number of drawbacks. Perhaps the most significant of these drawbacks is that interband aggregation between adjacent frequency bands (to produce a single band of larger width in frequency) is almost impossible to implement. The frequency selective diplexers have increasing group delay and loss at the center point between bands. Hence, if two diplexers adjacent in frequency are switched on to produce an aggregate band increased loss and group delay occurs at the center of the aggregate band.
One method used to overcome this problem is to power divide between alternate channels and recombine at the output. However, this technique increases the overall loss by 6 dB. Also, the rapid change in group delay at the crossover frequency makes phase tracking of devices (a necessity in interferometer systems) extremely difficult.
The present invention seeks to overcome the problems of the prior art.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides a microwave switched multiplexer having a bandpass Δf between frequencies f1 and f2, Δf=f1−f2, the multiplexer comprising
Preferably for the at least two signal channels the receive ends are connected to a common receive node and the transmit ends are connected to a common transmit node.
Preferably for every signal channel the antenna ends are connected to a common antenna node, the transmit ends are connected to a common transmit node and the receive ends are connected to a common receive node.
Preferably x is in the range 0.95 to 1.05, more preferably 0.97 to 1.03, more preferably 0.99 to 1.01
Preferably at least one of input, center and output resonators is an FBAR or SAW resonator.
Preferably the antenna node is connected to an antenna.
Preferably the antenna node comprises an antenna resonator.
Preferably the ratio of the admittance of the antenna resonator to the input resonator is
y/n:π/2
where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5
Preferably y is in the range 0.8 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Preferably the transmit node is connected to a transmitter, the transmitter being adapted to provide a microwave signal between frequencies f1 and f2
Preferably the transmit node comprises a transmitter resonator, the ratio of the admittances of the transmitter resonator to the output resonator being
y/n:π/2
where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5, preferably 0.8 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Preferably the receive node comprises a receiver resonator, the ratio of the admittance of the receiver resonator to the output resonator being
y/n:π/2
where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5, preferably 0.5 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Preferably the microwave switched resonator further comprises, a controller connected to the switches for switching the switches between states.
In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a mobile telecommunications device comprising at least one microwave switched multiplexer as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13.
The present invention will now be described by way of example only and not in any limitative sense with reference to the accompanying drawings in which
Shown in
In order to transmit in a particular frequency band the switch 1 to the transmitter 10 is set to connect the transmitter 10 to the appropriate diplexer 2. Similarly, the switch 5 to the antenna 7 is set to conned the antenna 7 to the same diplexer 2. To receive a signal the same procedure is followed using the receiver and receiver switch.
Such known multiplexers 1 have a number of drawbacks. Firstly, an additional diplexer 2 Is required for every frequency band that is to be covered. Secondly, as the number of diplexers 2 increases the switches 5,11 become more complex, so degrading performance. Thirdly, in the simplified architecture shown in
The operation of a microwave switched multiplexer according to the invention may best be explained by reference to the behaviour of a length of transmission line matched to load and source resistances (normalised to 1 Ohm). The transmission line may be viewed as a filter having no toss and constant group delay (linear phase) at all frequencies.
Such a transmission line can be defined by a transfer matrix—
Where c=cos h (πp) and s=sin h (πp), where p is the normalised complex frequency variable.
The reflection coefficient S11(p) and the transmission coefficient S12(p) are defined in terms of even Ye(p) and odd Yo(p) admittances of the network as
Where from the above one has
And hence S11(p)=0 and S12(p)=e−πp
Hence, the circuit is matched at all frequencies with a linear phase of πω(p=jω).
To form the equivalent parallel connection of circuit elements a partial fraction expansion of Ye(p) and Yo(p) is performed—
Hence,
Thus, the equivalent circuit for Yo(p) is as shown in
For Ye(p),
This may be decomposed into the sum of two infinite series as
Thus, the equivalent circuit for Ye(p) is as shown in
Combining the even and odd mode networks gives the circuit as shown in
This idealised multiplexer with an infinite number of signal channels has the property that it is matched at all frequencies and has a constant delay at all frequencies. To convert this multiplexer into a switched multiplexer some means of turning channels on and off is required. This could for example comprise a tuning mechanism connected to the central resonator of each signal channel which can be switched between ‘on’ and ‘off’ configurations. When in the ‘on’ configuration the resonant frequency of the associated central resonator in a signal channel is the same as that of the input and output resonators of that channel. When in the ‘off’ configuration the resonant frequency of the associated central resonator is remote from that of the input and output resonators of that channel such that the central resonator is effectively shorted out.
Independent of which signal channels ate switched on or off (a signal channel is said to be on if the tuning mechanism of the center resonator of the signal channel is in the on configuration and off if the tuning mechanism is in the off configuration) the odd mode admittance remains the same. For the even mode admittance however if the central resonator is shorted that component of the even mode network becomes the same as the equivalent component of the odd mode network.
For a multiplexer with a finite number of signal channels the elements which make up the signal channels are identical to the elements in the infinite network. There is an important difference however. If there are n channels the multiplexer has a bandpass of 2n in frequency, with each signal channel having a signal bandpass of 2. The tuning mechanism when in the off state tunes the resonant frequency of the associated center resonator out of the bandpass of the multiplexer.
If the microwave switched multiplexer having a finite number of signal channels has a bandpass Δf between f1 and f2 then the admittances of the resonators will still have the same ratios. However, the absolute values of the admittances need to be scaled such that the signal bandpass of each signal channel is Δf/n. The frequencies of the resonators are set such that the signal channels are spaced equally apart by Δf/n so together covering the multiplexer bandpass Δf.
The insertion loss and return loss for such a multiplexer with all signal channels on is shown in
To illustrate what happens to the behaviour of such a multiplexer when signal channels are switched off only channels near to the center of the multiplexer bandpass are considered. With this simplification a theoretical response can be derived by still considering the multiplexer to have an infinite number of channels.
For One Channel Off—
which gives
Hence. S11(p) is zero at p=+/−j and transmission loss (S12(p)) has a third order zero at p=0. This response is shown in
Hence,
Since the numerator has a third order zero at p=0 and the denominator has a second order zero at p=0 then S11(0)=0. Also, S11(+/−j)=0 and S12(+/−2j)=0. This response is shown in
For p=jw the phase is πw/2 for linear phase and hence the phase equals this value at w=0 and w=+/−1. Therefore the phase is an equidistant approximation to linear phase over the full passband between w=+/−1.
Three Channels Off—
For three adjacent channels turned off—
From which
Hence S11(p) is zero at p=+/−j3 and close inspection shows that S12(p) has a third order zero at p=0 and doubled ordered zeros at p=+/−j2. This is illustrated in
Three Channels On—
For three adjacent channels turned on—
Which gives
Close inspection shows that S11(p) has single ordered zeros at p=0. p=+/−j3 but double ordered zeros at p=+/−j. This response is shown in
To deal with the even degree cases (ie the multiplexer having an even number of Signal channels having signal bands arranged symmetrically about the center of the multiplexer passband) it is easier to perform the transformation p→p+j which produces symmetrical responses around p=0. For example for the second degree case one has. Two Channels Off—
Where S11(p) is zero at p=+/−j2 and S12(p) has a single ordered zero at p=0 and double ordered zeros at p=+/−j as shown in
Hence S11(p) has a third order zero at p=0 and zeros at p=+/−j as shown in
Plots are also shown in
If finite dissipation loss (ie finite Q) is Introduced into the resonators of the signal channels then due to the good return loss and approximately constant delay the overall loss in the respective signal channel passbands will be very flat. This is illustrated in
The above is included as theoretical background to help explain the behaviour of the microwave switched multiplexer 21 according to the invention.
A single signal channel 20 of a microwave switched multiplexer 21 according to the invention is shown in
Extending from the first port 23 to an antenna end 26 is a common line 27. The common line 27 comprises an input resonator 28 and a center resonator 29 connected together in cascade. The center resonator 29 is coupled between the input resonator 28 and the first port 23. The resonators 28,29 are typically thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBAR resonators) or surface acoustic wave resonators (SAW resonators). Such resonators 28,29 are highly compact and so suitable for use in mobile handsets. The invention is not limited to such resonators and other resonators such as cavity resonators are possible.
Extending from the second port 24 of the switch 22 to a transmit end 30 is a transmit line 31. The transmit line 31 comprises an output resonator 32. When the switch 22 is in the transmit position the output resonator 32 is connected in cascade with the input and center resonators 28,29. When the switch 22 is not in the transmit position the output resonator 32 is not connected to the input and center resonators 28,29. Again, the output resonator is preferably an FBAR resonator or SAW resonator although other types of resonator are possible.
Extending from the third port 25 to a receive end 33 is a receive line 34. The receive line 34 comprises an output resonator 32. When the switch 22 is in the receive position the output resonator 32 is connected in cascade with the Input and center resonators 28,29. When the switch 22 is not in the receive position the output resonator is not connected to the input and center resonators 28,29. Again, the output resonator 32 is preferably an FBAR resonator or SAW resonator although other types of resonator are possible.
The two output resonators 32 are preferably identical. In particular they have the same admittance as each other.
The ratio of the admittances of the input resonator 28, center resonator 29 and output resonator 32 is π/2:4/π:π/2 with x in the range 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05, more preferably 0.97 to 1.03, more preferably 0.99 to 1.01. Preferably x is as close to 1 as possible. All resonators 28,29,32 within a single channel 20 have the same resonant frequency related to the center frequency for the signal bandpass for that channel 20.
Shown in
Corresponding resonators 28,29,32 in different signal channels 20 have the same admittance values ie all the input resonators 28 have the same admittance values, all the center resonators 29 have the same admittance values and all the output resonators 32 have the same admittance values. As the absolute values of the admittances of these resonators 28,29,32 is changed (whilst keeping the ratios of the admittances constant within the range specified above) the width of the signal bandpass of each channel 20 changes. The absolute values of these admittances are set such that the width of the signal bandpass for each signal channel 20 is substantially Δf/n. Between them the signal bandpasses of the signal channels 20 cover the entire bandpass of the microwave switched multiplexer 21. This is shown schematically in
Each antenna end 26 is connected to an antenna node 35. A common antenna 36 is connected to the antenna node 35. Each receive end 33 is connected to a common receive node 37. A microwave receiver 38 is connected to the receive node 37. Each transmit end 30 is connected to a common transmit node 39. A microwave transmitter 40 adapted to provide a microwave signal within the bandpass of the microwave switched multiplexer 21 is connected to the transmit node 39.
Connected to each of the switches 22 is a controller (not shown). The controller programmatically sets the position of each switch 22. By suitably setting the switches 22 one can produce a microwave switched multiplexer 21 with any desired arrangement of transmit and receive frequency bands within the bandpass of the microwave switched multiplexer 21 with each transmit or receive frequency band made up of the signal bandpasses of one or more signal channels 20. This is shown schematically in
The microwave switched multiplexer 21 according to the invention has a number of advantages. Firstly, one does not require a separate diplexer for each frequency band. The multiplexer 21 comprises a fixed number of signal channels 20 which can be configured to produce any desired configuration of transmit and receive frequency bands. No complex switching is required. All that is required is a single simple switch 22 for each signal channel 20. Most significantly if one sets two (or more) adjacent signal channels 20 to be in the same state (ie either receive or transmit) an aggregated band is produced having a bandpass width equal to the sum of the signal bandpass widths of the signal channels 20. Unlike in the prior art this aggregated band has constant group delay and loss across the aggregated band. In particular there is no increase in loss and/or group delay at the crossover point of the signal bandpasses of adjacent signal channels 20 making up the aggregated band.
Whilst the above embodiment of a microwave switched multiplexer 21 according to the invention is a significant improvement over known microwave switched multiplexer it can be difficult to couple to the multiplexer 21 across the entire passband without significant loss. Shown in
In this embodiment the antenna node 35 is an antenna resonator 35. The antenna ends 26 of each of the signal channels 20 are coupled to the antenna resonator 35 such that the antenna resonator 35 is connected in cascade with each of the input resonators 28. The antenna 36 is also coupled to the antenna resonator 35. Signals pass from the signal channels 20, through the antenna resonator 35 to the antenna 36 (and vice versa). Again, the antenna resonator 35 is typically a SAW resonator or FBAR resonator although other types of resonator are possible.
If the microwave switched multiplexer 21 had an infinite number of signal channels 20 and infinite bandwidth the antenna resonator 35 would not be required One would be able to couple to the microwave switched multiplexer 21 across the entire passband with only minimal insertion less. The microwave switched multiplexer 21 according to the invention however has only a finite number of signal channels 20 and finite bandpass. The antenna resonator 35 compensates for the absence of the infinite number of signal channels which have signal bandpasses outside the bandpass of the multiplexer 21, allowing one to couple to the multiplexer 21 without significant loss across the bandpass of the multiplexer 21.
In order to achieve this compensation the ratio of the admittance of the antenna resonator 35 to the input resonator 28 is y/n:π/2, where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5, more preferably 0.8 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Similarly, in this embodiment the transmitter node 39 is a transmitter resonator 39 coupled in cascade with the output resonators 32 of the transmit line 31. Signals from the transmitter 40 pass though the transmitter resonator 39 to the signal channels 20 and vice versa. The ratio of the admittance of the transmitter resonator 39 to the output resonator is y/n:π/2, where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5, more preferably 0.8 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Similarly, in this embodiment the receiver node 37 is a receiver resonator 37 coupled in cascade with the output resonators 32 of the receive line 34. Signals from the signal channels 20 pass though the receiver resonator 37 to the receiver 38. The ratio of the admittance of the receiver resonator 37 to the output resonator is y/n:π/2, where y is in the range 0.5 to 1.5, more preferably 0.8 to 1.2, more preferably 0.9 to 1.1, more preferably 0.95 to 1.05.
Ideally the transmitter resonator 39, receiver resonator 37 and antenna resonator 35 all have the same admittance values.
In this embodiment two adjacent signal channels 20 are configured in the transmit state such that their signal bandpasses form an aggregated transmission band. Two adjacent signal channels 20 are configured in the receive state such that their signal bandpasses form an aggregated receive band. As can be seen for both the aggregated transmit and receive bands there is no change in insertion loss at the cross over point of the bandpasses of the signal channels 20 making up the bands. Further, there is no change in group delay at this point.
Throughout the above description reference is made to the width of the bandpass of a signal channel 20. As the signal channels interact this is measured with only one signal channel 20 switched on and all other signal channels 20 switched off.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1515922.1 | Sep 2015 | GB | national |
1518890.7 | Oct 2015 | GB | national |
1518893.1 | Oct 2015 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2016/052768 | 9/8/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/042559 | 3/16/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6806791 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20060114082 | Hidalgo Carpintero et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20140167877 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150133067 | Chang et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160277001 | Guyette | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20190173145 | Abdo | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1194157 | Sep 1985 | CA |
Entry |
---|
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report issued in UK Application No. GB1515922.1 dated Jan. 11, 2016. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report issued in UK Application No. GB1518893.1.1 dated Apr. 29, 2016. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report issued in UK Application No. GB1615248.0 dated Feb. 28, 2017. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/GB2016/052768 dated Dec. 7, 2016. |
Shang Xiaobang et al., Novel Multiplexer Topologies Based on All-Resonator Structions, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Service Center, vol. 61, No. 11, pp. 3838-3845, Piscataway, NJ, United States. |
Clark T-C Nguyen, MEMS-based RF channel selection for true software-defined cognitive radio and low-power sensor communications, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2013, pp. 110-119, Piscataway, United States. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190222235 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |