Microwave system with redundant processing devices and passive switching

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6483396
  • Patent Number
    6,483,396
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 20, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity includes a microwave cavity and two microwave processing devices. Each microwave processing device has a transmissive impedance when it is on and a reflective impedance when it is off. There is a separate coupling probe extending from each of the microwave processing devices to locations within the microwave cavity. When a primary one of the microwave processing devices is switched on and the redundant microwave processing device is switched off, its coupling probe reflects energy so that almost all of the energy flows through the primary microwave processing device. If the primary microwave processing device fails and is switched off, its coupling probe reflects energy so that almost all energy flows through the redundant device. No separate active switching device or circuit is used.
Description




This invention relates to a microwave system which has redundant processing devices and, more particularly, to an approach for accomplishing switching between the processing devices when the primary device fails and the redundant device is activated.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Microwave systems are sometimes used in situations where their operation is critical and cannot be interrupted, or where they are difficult to repair in the event of a failure. For example, microwave amplifier circuits used in communications satellites receive microwave communications signals transmitted from a ground station to the satellite, amplify those signals, and retransmit them back to another ground station. These circuits cannot be permitted to fail, both because their failure would render the entire communications channel useless and because it is difficult to repair the amplifier circuits. Similar considerations apply to microwave communications circuits in deep space and interplanetary missions.




To ensure continuous operation, most microwave systems used in such critical applications are furnished with redundant active components. For example, there may be a primary active amplifier and a backup active amplifier in each communications circuit. The primary active amplifier is used in normal operation, with the backup active amplifier switched off. If the primary active amplifier fails, the backup active amplifier is switched on.




The microwave signal propagating in a waveguide is switched from the primary active amplifier to the backup active amplifier. Available microwave waveguide switches are heavy, costly, complex to integrate into the microwave waveguide system, and consume power. In the case of electro-mechanical or ferrite waveguide switches, the bulkiness of the switch limits the degree of miniaturization that may be achieved. These considerations are particularly troublesome where there are multiple microwave waveguide switches required to interconnect various redundant active devices. Nevertheless, the risk in loss of the communications circuit has been judged to mandate the use of the redundant active components and the associated microwave switches.




There is a need for an improved approach to providing redundancy in microwave circuits that require such redundancy due to their critical nature or inaccessibility for repair. The present invention fulfills this need, and further provides related advantages.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a redundant microwave system wherein switching between a primary microwave processing device and a redundant backup microwave processing device is accomplished without the use of an active switch. The weight, cost, bulk, and possible signal loss of an active switch are saved, but advantages of redundancy are retained. The present approach may be implemented in a wide range of applications.




A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity comprises a microwave cavity and a first microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity. The first microwave processing device has a transmissive impedance when the first microwave processing device is operable and a reflective impedance when the first microwave processing device is not operable. A first coupling probe extends from the first microwave processing device to a first probe termination location within an interior of the microwave cavity. A second, redundant, microwave processing device is located exterior to the microwave cavity. The second microwave processing device is substantially identical to the first microwave processing device and has the transmissive impedance when the second microwave processing device is operable and the reflective impedance when the second microwave processing device is not operable. A second coupling probe extends from the second microwave processing device to a second probe termination location within the interior of the microwave cavity. Either of the microwave processing devices may include an impedance-matching network.




The two microwave processing devices may be of any operable type, but are typically amplifiers or receivers. The coupling probes may be of any operable type, but are typically coaxial probes or stripline probes.




There are three particularly preferred embodiments of this approach, In one, the first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each positioned at about a respective one of the two electric field spatial maxima of a TE(


2


,


0


) microwave signal propagating in the waveguide. In a practical implementation, the microwave cavity is a rectangular waveguide having a direction of elongation, a long transverse dimension perpendicular to the direction of elongation, a first sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, and a second sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension. The first sidewall is spaced apart from the second sidewall by the long transverse dimension, The first probe termination location is about ¼ of the distance from the first sidewall to the second sidewall, and the second probe termination location is about ¾ of the distance from the first sidewall to the second sidewall.




In a second embodiment, the first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each positioned at about the single electric field spatial maximum of a TE(


1


,


0


) microwave signal propagating in the waveguide, In a practical implementation, the microwave cavity is a rectangular waveguide having a direction of elongation, a long transverse dimension perpendicular to the direction of elongation, a first sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, and a second sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension. The first sidewall is spaced apart from the second sidewall by the long transverse dimension. The first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each about midway between the first sidewall and the second sidewall, positioned closely together and immediately adjacent to each other, but still distinctly two separate probes.




In a third embodiment, the microwave cavity comprises a first volume, a microwave feed in communication with the first volume, and a second volume communicating with the first volume. The second volume is separated into a first region and a second region by a wall. The first probe termination location is within the first region and the second probe termination is within the second region.




In the general approach and all of these specific embodiments, each of the microwave processing devices has two impedance states. When the microwave processing device is active (the “on” state), its transmissive impedance is such that the microwave signals pass between the microwave cavity and the active microwave processing device, through the coupling probe. That is, the transmissive impedance establishes boundary conditions within the cavity such that there is a mode conversion and propagation of the microwave signal into the coupling probe. When the microwave processing device becomes inactive (the “off” state), its reflective impedance is such that the microwave signals do not pass between the microwave cavity and the active microwave processing device, through the coupling probe. That is, the reflective impedance establishes boundary conditions within the cavity such that there is not a mode conversion and propagation of the microwave signal into the coupling probe. Operable values of transmissive and reflective impedances may be readily determined using conventional microwave techniques.




In service, the first microwave processing device is operated as the active primary processing device, and the other, second microwave processing device is inactive as the redundant microwave processing device. If the first microwave processing device fails or is otherwise removed from service, it is switched off so that its impedance results in rejection of the microwave energy. The redundant microwave processing device is switched on, so that it no longer rejects the microwave energy in the microwave cavity and allows it to flow to the second microwave processing device.




The present approach may be contrasted with the usual approach for accomplishing switching in redundant microwave circuits. In the conventional approach, in addition to the two microwave processing devices there is a separate device, an active waveguide switch, that directs microwave energy flowing in the waveguide either to the primary device or to the redundant device. In the present approach, there is a mode conversion between the microwave cavity and the two probes. The load impedances of the microwave processing devices themselves are used to alter the boundary conditions of the waveguide cavity and thence the input impedances of the mode conversions accomplished at the microwave cavity/probe interface, so that no separate active switch is required.




Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention. The scope of the invention is not, however, limited to this preferred embodiment.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a general schematic view of a redundant microwave system;





FIG. 2

is an illustration of the electric fields in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode of a rectangular waveguide;





FIG. 3

is a schematic perspective view of two coupling probes interconnecting with a rectangular waveguide carrying microwave energy in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode,





FIG. 4

is a schematic perspective view of the coupling probes of FIG.


3


and their spatial relation with the electric field vector in the rectangular waveguide carrying microwave energy in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode;





FIG. 5

is a schematic sectional view of the coupling probes of FIG.


3


and their interaction with the electric field vector in the rectangular waveguide carrying microwave energy in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode to produce a quasi-TE(


2


,


0


) mode;





FIG. 6

is an illustration of the electric fields in the TE(


1


,


0


) mode of a rectangular waveguide;





FIG. 7

is a schematic perspective view of two coupling probes interconnecting with a rectangular waveguide carrying microwave energy in the TE(


1


,


0


) mode;





FIG. 8

is a schematic perspective view of the coupling probes of FIG.


3


and their spatial relation with the electric field vector in the rectangular waveguide carrying microwave energy in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode;





FIG. 9

is a schematic view of a cavity-coupled redundancy approach; and





FIG. 10

is a schematic view of a conventional approach to microwave redundancy.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIG. 1

depicts a redundant microwave system


20


that is operable to process a microwave signal


22


. The microwave system


20


includes a microwave cavity


24


, which in some specific embodiments to be discussed subsequently is a waveguide and in other embodiments is a cavity. A first microwave processing device


26


is located exterior to the microwave cavity


24


. The first microwave processing device


26


may be of any operable type, but is typically an amplifier such as a low noise amplifier, a solid state power amplifier, or a traveling wave tube amplifier, or a receiver such as a low noise receiver. The first microwave processing device


26


is characterized by and has a transmissive impedance when the first microwave processing device is operable (i.e., in an “on” state) and a reflective impedance when the first microwave processing device is not operable (i.e., in an “off” state).




A first coupling probe


28


extends from the first microwave processing device


26


to a first probe termination location


30


within an interior


32


of the microwave cavity


24


. The first coupling probe


28


may be of any operable type, with a coaxial-construction probe or a stripline-construction probe favored. An impedance matching network


29


is optionally present in the line between the first microwave processing device


26


and the first coupling probe


28


. In most cases, the impedance-matching network


29


is present, but in some instances it may be omitted if the impedances of the microwave processing device and the microwave cavity are naturally matched. It is therefore “optional”, but usually present. Where an impedance-matching network is present, it may be considered as part of the microwave processing device.




A second microwave processing device


34


is located exterior to the microwave cavity


24


. The second microwave processing device


34


is substantially identical to the first microwave processing device


26


. The first microwave processing device


26


may be thought of as the primary active device, and the second microwave processing device


34


may be thought of as the redundant active device. The second microwave processing device


34


, like the first microwave processing device


26


, has the transmissive impedance when the second microwave processing device


34


is operable (i.e., in an “on state) and the reflective impedance when the second microwave processing device


34


is not operable (i.e., in an “off” state).




A second coupling probe


36


extends from the second microwave processing device


34


to a second probe termination location


38


within the interior


32


of the microwave cavity


24


. The second coupling probe


36


may be of any operable type, with a coaxial-construction probe or a stripline-construction probe favored. An impedance matching network


37


is optionally present in the line between the second microwave processing device


34


and the second coupling probe


36


. In most cases, the impedance-matching network


37


is present, but in some instances it may be omitted if the impedances of the microwave processing device and the microwave cavity are naturally matched. It is therefore “optional”, but usually present.




The positions of the first probe termination location


30


and the second probe termination location


38


are indicated schematically in FIG.


1


. Their exact positions for various embodiments will be discussed subsequently. In each case, there are two distinct probes and two distinct termination locations (even though they may be closely spaced in some cases).





FIGS. 2-5

illustrate details of a first preferred embodiment of the approach of the invention, wherein the microwave cavity


24


is a waveguide


40


and the microwave signal propagates through the waveguide


40


in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode.

FIG. 2

illustrates the electric field vector E in such a waveguide


40


with the microwave energy propagating in the TE(


2


,


0


) mode. There are two maxima in the E-field, at intermediate locations along the transverse width of the waveguide


40


. As shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, the two coupling probes


28


and


36


are positioned at about these maxima in the E-field. Stated another way, the microwave cavity


24


is a rectangular waveguide


40


having a direction of elongation


42


, a long transverse dimension


44


perpendicular to the direction of elongation


42


, a first sidewall


46


parallel to the direction of elongation


42


and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension


44


, and a second sidewall


48


parallel to the direction of elongation


42


and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension


44


. The first sidewall


46


is spaced apart from the second sidewall


48


by the long transverse dimension


44


. The first probe termination location


30


is about ¼ of the distance from the first sidewall


46


to the second sidewall


48


and the second probe termination location


38


is about ¾ of the distance from the first sidewall


46


to the second sidewall


48


, the distances being measured parallel to the long transverse dimension


44


.





FIG. 5

illustrates the result of having the first microwave processing device


26


operating and the second microwave processing device


34


not operating, The transmissive impedance of the first coupling probe


28


is such that microwave energy flows from the waveguide


40


into the first coupling probe


28


. The reflective impedance of the second coupling probe


28


is such that it reflects microwave energy and does not transmit microwave energy to the second microwave processing device


34


The E-field is distorted as illustrated in

FIG. 5

, becoming a quasi-TE(


2


,


0


) mode with some resemblance to the TE(


2


,


0


) E-field of

FIG. 2

, but also with a substantial distortion. However, the flow of microwave energy into the first coupling probe


28


may be optimized using conventional microwave design techniques. The relations are reversed when the fist microwave processing device


28


is not operating and the second microwave processing device


34


is operating, which condition would occur if the first (primary) microwave device


28


bad failed and the second (redundant) microwave device


34


were switched on to replace it.





FIGS. 6-8

illustrate details of a second preferred embodiment of the approach of the invention, wherein the microwave cavity


24


is a waveguide


40


and the microwave signal propagates through the waveguide


40


in the TE(


1


,


0


) mode. (Because the terminology and features of the waveguide are similar to those of the first embodiment of

FIGS. 2-5

, the same nomenclature is used for the second embodiment where appropriate.)

FIG. 6

illustrates the electric field vector E in such a waveguide


40


with the microwave energy propagating in the TE(


1


,


0


) mode. There is one maximum in the E-field, at the central location along the transverse width of the waveguide


40


. As shown in

FIGS. 7-8

, the two coupling probes


28


and


36


are positioned closely together at about the position of the maximum in the E-field. Stated another way, the microwave cavity


24


is the rectangular waveguide


40


having the direction of elongation


42


, the long transverse dimension


44


perpendicular to the direction of elongation


42


, the first sidewall


46


parallel to the direction of elongation


42


and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension


44


, and the second sidewall


48


parallel to the direction of elongation


42


and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension


44


. The first sidewall


46


is spaced apart from the second sidewall


48


by the long transverse dimension


44


. The first probe termination location


30


and the second probe termination location


38


are each about midway between the first sidewall


46


and the second sidewall


48


. This positioning may be accomplished by placing the two coupling probes


28


and


36


directly next to each other at about the mid-point between the sidewalls


46


and


48


(as illustrated), or placing the two probes at the mid-point but one behind the other along the direction of elongation


42


.




When the first microwave processing device


26


is operating and the second microwave processing device


34


is not operating, the transmissive impedance of the first coupling probe


28


is such that microwave energy flows from the waveguide


40


into the first coupling probe


28


. The reflective impedance of the second coupling probe


28


is such that it reflects microwave energy and does not transmit microwave energy to the second microwave processing device


34


. The relations are reversed when the first microwave processing device


28


is not operating and the second microwave processing device


34


is operating, which condition would occur if the first (primary) microwave device


28


had failed and the second (redundant) microwave device


34


were switched on to replace it.




The first and second embodiments utilize tie microwave waveguide


40


, with the first coupling probe


28


located at a first electric field spatial maximum location and the second coupling probe


36


located at a second electric field spatial maximum location. The first electric-field spatial maximum location is the same as the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is exactly one electric-field spatial maximum location, as in the case of the TE(


1


,


0


) mode propagation. The first electric-field spatial maximum location is different from and spaced apart from the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is more than one electric-field spatial maximum location, as in the case of the TE(


2


,


0


) mode propagation.





FIG. 9

illustrates aspects of a third preferred embodiment of the approach of the invention. The microwave cavity


24


includes a first volume


60


, and a microwave feed


62


in communication with the first volume


60


. The microwave cavity


24


further includes a second volume


64


communicating with the first volume


60


. The second volume


64


is separated into a first region


66


and a second region


68


by a wall


70


. The first probe termination location


30


is within the first region


66


and the second probe termination location


38


is within the second region


68


. A similar arrangement may be used at the output end


72


of the redundant microwave system


20


.




The third preferred embodiment of

FIG. 9

includes the first microwave processing device


26


and the second microwave processing device


34


. These devices


26


and


34


include active microwave components, such as illustrated a first microwave amplifier


74


and a second microwave amplifier


76


. They may also, and usually do, include a first input impedance matching network


78


in series between the first coupling probe


28


and the first microwave amplifier


74


, and a second input impedance matching network


80


in series between the second coupling probe


36


and the second microwave amplifier


76


. They may also, and usually do, include a first output impedance matching network


82


in series between the output end


72


and the first microwave amplifier


74


, and a second output impedance matching network


84


in series between the output end


72


and the second microwave amplifier


76


. The impedance matching networks


78


,


80


,


82


, and


84


are usually present but in some instances may be omitted if the impedances of the connected elements are naturally matched. They are therefore “optional”, but usually present.




The impedance matching networks


78


and


80


transform the load impedance of the respective microwave amplifiers


74


and


76


into input impedances at the coupling probes


28


and


36


that either transmit (when the respective amplifier is “on”) or reflect (when the respective amplifier is “off) the microwave energy in the microwave cavity


24


. In an example, an input impedance of about 50 ohms at the coupling probe may allow microwave energy to pass from the cavity into the coupling probe, the amplifier, and other components, and to the output end. Any substantially greater or lesser input impedance reflects the microwave energy in the microwave cavity


24


and does not allow it to pass. Thus, when the first microwave amplifier


74


is turned on and the second microwave amplifier


76


is turned off, the first impedance matching network


78


sets the input impedance at the first coupling probe


28


to about 50 ohms and the second impedance matching network


80


sets the input impedance at the second coupling probe


36


to be some value substantially larger or smaller than about 50 ohms. Microwave energy flows through the first microwave processing device


26


but not through the second microwave processing device


34


. At a later time, when the first microwave amplifier


74


is turned off (as in the case where it has failed) and the second microwave amplifier


76


is turned on (to serve as the redundant backup processing device), the first impedance matching network


78


sets the input impedance at the first coupling probe


28


to some value substantially larger or smaller than about 50 ohms and the second impedance matching network


80


sets the input impedance at the second coupling probe


36


to be about 50 ohms. Microwave energy flows through the second microwave processing device


34


but not through the first microwave processing device


26


. The impedance matching networks


78


and


80


may be conventional structures such as a transmission line with the required impedance, a quarter wavelength transformer, or a shunt-mounted PIN diode. Similar principles apply for the design of impedance-matching networks for other embodiments as well, such as those of

FIGS. 1

,


2


-


5


, and


6


-


8


.




The present approach, shown generally in FIG.


1


and specifically in

FIGS. 2-5

,


6


-


8


, and


9


, is contrasted with a conventional approach as shown in FIG.


10


. In the conventional approach, an input waveguide


90


provides energy to an input microwave waveguide switch


92


. The input microwave waveguide switch


92


alternatively directs the energy in the input waveguide


90


into a first waveguide


94


or a second waveguide


96


, which conduct the energy to the respective first device


98


or second device


100


. The outputs of the devices


98


and


100


are provided to an output microwave waveguide switch


102


, and thrice to an output waveguide


104


. This conventional approach is operable, but it requires the two microwave waveguide switches


92


and


102


, with their associated weight, size, cost, attenuation of signal strength, and potential for failure. The present approach avoids these problems.




The present approach of switching microwaves in cavities is also contrasted with the switching of signals in circuits in which the signals propagate on wires, either in the microwave range or at lower frequencies. Where the signal propagates on a wire, switching is accomplished by redirection of electron flow. In the case where the signals propagate in a waveguide cavity, the switching is accomplished by changing the boundary conditions of the waveguide cavity at the point of the coupling probes by varying the impedances of the loads connected to the probes. This changing of boundary conditions accomplishes a change in the wave propagation mode and thence mode conversion of the propagating microwave signal.




Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention. The scope of the invention is not, however, limited to this preferred embodiment.



Claims
  • 1. A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity, comprising:a microwave cavity; a first microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the first microwave processing device having a transmissive impedance when the first microwave processing device is operable and a reflective impedance when the first microwave processing device is not operable; a first coupling probe extending from the first microwave processing device to a first probe termination location within an interior of the microwave cavity; a second microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the second microwave processing device being substantially identical to the first microwave processing device and having the transmissive impedance when the second microwave processing device is operable and the reflective impedance when the second microwave processing device is not operable; and a second coupling probe extending from the second microwave processing device to a second probe termination location within the interior of the microwave cavity.
  • 2. The microwave system of claim 1, the first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each positioned at about a respective one of the two electric field spatial maxima of a TE(2,0) microwave signal propagating in the waveguide.
  • 3. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein the microwave cavity is a rectangular waveguide having a direction of elongation, a long transverse dimension perpendicular to the direction of elongation, a first sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, and a second sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, the first sidewall being spaced apart from the second sidewall by the long transverse dimension, and wherein the first probe termination location is about ¼ of the distance from the first sidewall to the second sidewall and the second probe termination location is about ¾ of the distance from the first sidewall to the second sidewall.
  • 4. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein the microwave cavity is a rectangular waveguide having a direction of elongation, a long transverse dimension perpendicular to the direction of elongation, a first sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, and a second sidewall parallel to the direction of elongation and perpendicular to the long transverse dimension, the first sidewall being spaced apart from the second sidewall by the long transverse dimension, and wherein the first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each about midway between the first sidewall and the second sidewall.
  • 5. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein the microwave cavity comprisesa first volume, a microwave feed in communication with the first volume, a second volume communicating with the first volume, the second volume being separated into a first region and a second region by a wall, and wherein the first probe termination location is within the first region and the second probe termination location is within the second region.
  • 6. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a coaxial probe.
  • 7. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a stripline probe.
  • 8. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein the first microwave processing device is selected from the group consisting of an amplifier and a receiver.
  • 9. The microwave system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first microwave processing device and the second microwave processing device includes an impedance-matching network.
  • 10. A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity, comprising:a microwave cavity; a first microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the first microwave processing device having a transmissive impedance when the first microwave processing device is operable and a reflective impedance when the first microwave processing device is not operable; a first coupling probe extending from the first microwave processing device to a first probe termination location within an interior of the microwave cavity; a second microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the second microwave processing device being substantially identical to the first microwave processing device and having the transmissive impedance when the second microwave processing device is operable and the reflective impedance when the second microwave processing device is not operable; and a second coupling probe extending from the second microwave processing device to a second probe termination location within the interior of the microwave cavity, wherein the first probe termination location and the second probe termination location are each positioned at about the electric field spatial maximum of a TE(0,1) microwave signal propagating in the waveguide.
  • 11. A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity and having a propagation mode with at least one electric-field spatial maximum location, comprising:a microwave waveguide; a first microwave processing device located exterior to the waveguide; a first coupling probe extending from the first microwave processing device into an interior of the waveguide at a first probe termination location substantially coincident with a first electric-field spatial maximum location; a second microwave processing device located exterior to the waveguide, the second microwave processing device being substantially identical to the first microwave processing device; a second coupling probe extending from the second microwave processing device into the interior of the waveguide at a second probe termination location substantially coincident with a second electric-field spatial maximum location, wherein the first electric-field spatial maximum location is the same as the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is exactly one electric-field spatial maximum location, and wherein the first electric-field spatial maximum location is different than and spaced apart from the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is more than one electric-field spatial maximum location.
  • 12. The microwave system of claim 11, wherein there are two electric-field spatial maxima.
  • 13. The microwave system of claim 11, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a coaxial probe.
  • 14. The microwave system of claim 11, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a stripline probe.
  • 15. The microwave system of claim 11, wherein the first microwave processing device is selected from the group consisting of an amplifier and a receiver.
  • 16. A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity and having a propagation mode wherein there is one electric-field spatial maximum location, comprising:a microwave waveguide; a first microwave processing device located exterior to the waveguide; a first coupling probe extending from the first microwave processing device into an interior of the waveguide at a first probe termination location substantially coincident with a first electric-field spatial maximum location; a second microwave processing device located exterior to the waveguide, the second microwave processing device being substantially identical to the first microwave processing device; a second coupling probe extending from the second microwave processing device into the interior of the waveguide at a second probe termination location substantially coincident with a second electric-field spatial maximum location, wherein the first electric-field spatial maximum location is the same as the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is exactly one electric-field spatial maximum location, and wherein the first electric-field spatial maximum location is different than and spaced apart from the second electric-field spatial maximum location if there is more than one electric-field spatial maximum location.
  • 17. A redundant microwave system operable to process a microwave signal propagating in a microwave cavity, comprising:a microwave cavity comprising a first volume, a microwave feed in communication with the first volume, a second volume communicating with the first volume, and a wall separating the second volume into a first region and a second region; a first microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the first microwave processing device including an impedance matching network and having a transmissive impedance when the first microwave processing device is operable and a reflective impedance when the first microwave processing device is not operable; a first coupling probe extending from the first microwave processing device to the first region of the microwave cavity; a second microwave processing device located exterior to the microwave cavity, the second microwave processing device being substantially identical to the first microwave processing device; and a second coupling probe extending from the second microwave processing device to the second region of the microwave cavity.
  • 18. The microwave system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a coaxial probe.
  • 19. The microwave system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the first coupling probe and the second coupling probe is a stripline probe.
  • 20. The microwave system of claim 17, wherein the first microwave processing device is selected from the group consisting of an amplifier and a receiver.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
3286202 Daveau et al. Nov 1966 A
3721921 Lamy et al. Mar 1973 A
6069529 Evans May 2000 A
6081170 Enokuma Jun 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1 507 147 Apr 1978 GB
411168301 Jun 1999 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Simon Ramo et al., Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics, 1965, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2nd Ed. pp. 216-218.*
Kenney, Electronic Communication Systems, 1970, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2nd Ed. pp. 365-366.*
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 010, No. 168 (E-411) & JP 61 018204 A (Fujitsu Ltd), Jan. 27, 1986, abstract.