The present invention relates to a microwaveable packaged good article, and more particularly, it relates to an overcap for a microwaveable packaged good article.
Consumers have responded favorably to a variety of packaged foods provided as microwaveable packaged good articles. In particular, consumers have shown a strong preference for ready-to-eat packaged good articles that can be quickly and conveniently heated in a microwave oven. Some particularly popular packaged good articles include lunch or dinner entrees such as soups, chilies, stews, and pasta meals (e.g., spaghetti and ravioli) provided in sealed containers that are suitable for microwave heating.
In general, a microwaveable packaged good article includes a container containing a consumable item, an optional removable lid to sealingly preserve the consumable item within the container prior to preparation/consumption, and an overcap. To prepare the consumable item, the consumer typically first removes the overcap from the container for access to the removable lid. The removable lid is then separated from the container to expose the consumable item within the container. The overcap is then replaced on the container to form a covered cooking vessel. In this manner, the assembled container/overcap is readied for subsequent microwave heating of the consumable item.
During microwave heating, the consumable item is preferably heated to its boiling point. When the consumable item boils, steam is generated. In this regard, the overcap typically includes at least one vent to permit an equalization of pressure within the container. That is to say, the heated steam exits the container through the vent to alleviate a build-up of pressure inside the container. Boiling of the consumable item inevitably results in bubbling or splashing within the container, resulting in liquid accumulation along an inside surface of the overcap. Frequently, the bubbling/splashing consumable item will seep between the overcap and a lip of the container, dripping or flowing onto an exterior of the container.
For example, one known overcap for a microwaveable packaged good article includes a top panel provided with vent holes and a skirt descending from the top panel. A series of spaced reinforcing ribs is provided on the interior of the overcap, extending between an interior surface of the top panel and an interior side of the skirt. Upon final assembly, the ribs rest against a top of the container, with a portion of the skirt extending along an exterior of the container. Unfortunately, during microwave heating, the boiling consumable item within the container can accumulate between the reinforcing ribs and subsequently seep or drip between the skirt and the exterior of the container. These drips are unsightly, may soil the microwave (or other surface that the container is subsequently placed on), and may lead to user handling inconveniences.
In addition, the known overcap can deform when a large axial force is applied to the top panel. For example, during distribution and merchandising, several packaged good articles are commonly stacked vertically one on top of another. To this end, mass distribution normally entails grouping a number of individual packaged good articles within a tray or box, and then stacking multiple ones of the so-formed trays on a pallet. In this manner, a large axial loading is directed onto the top panel of the bottommost packaged good article present on a distributor's pallet or even a merchant's shelf.
By way of reference, the skirt/ribs of the known microwaveable container overcap are sized to position the top panel well above a top portion of the container to ensure adequate spacing during boiling. Thus, the overcap is supported relative to the container primarily by the ribs, which in turn are supported by the skirt. In the presence of axial loadings of greater than forty pounds, the known overcap exhibits structural failure in the form of the ribs deflecting or deforming, leading to non-reversible deformation of the skirt. These deformations create an unattractive merchandizing unit at the point of sale, reduce viability of the overcap during subsequent microwave heating and have the potential to damage the contained item by rupturing the removable lid. In any regard, the known overcap insufficiently resists deformation from axial loadings that are oftentimes encountered during normal distribution and merchandizing.
Consumers continue to show strong demand for microwaveable packaged good articles. Unfortunately, the standard overcap for microwaveable packaged good articles can lead to the boiling consumable item exiting the container and soiling the container's exterior and/or inside of the microwave. In addition, the known overcap employed with microwaveable packaged good articles can radially deform under common distribution and merchandizing loads, thus threatening the integrity of the packaged good article. Therefore, a need exists for an overcap for a microwaveable packaged good article that resists radial deformation and prevents boiling contents from exiting the container.
Some aspects in accordance with principles of the present invention relate to a microwaveable packaged good article. The microwaveable packaged good article includes a container and an overcap. The container includes a base and a continuous wall extending from the base terminating in a chime. The overcap includes a panel, a neck extending from the panel terminating in a drip bead, and a skirt radially spaced from the drip bead to define a channel between the skirt and the drip bead. In this regard, the chime is received within the channel upon assembly of the overcap to the container.
Other aspects of the present invention relate to an overcap for a microwaveable packaged good article. The overcap includes a panel, a neck extending from the panel terminating in a drip bead, and a skirt radially spaced from the drip bead to define a channel between the skirt and the drip bead.
Yet other aspects in accordance with principles of the present invention relate to a method of microwave heating a packaged good article. The method includes providing a container containing a consumable item and securing an overcap to container. In this regard, the overcap includes a panel, a neck extending from the panel terminating in a drip bead, and a skirt radially spaced from the drip bead to define a channel couplable to a chime of the container. The method further includes microwave heating the packaged good article to boil the consumable item. In doing so, portions of the boiling consumable item will accumulate along an interior of the overcap. The drip bead directs at least a portion of the accumulated consumable item back into the container.
Embodiments of the invention are better understood with reference to the following drawings. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like referenced numerals designate corresponding similar parts.
An exemplary microwaveable packaged good article 20 according to principles of the present invention is illustrated in perspective view in
The container 22 includes a base 26 (referenced generally in
In one embodiment, a removable lid 32 is removably attached to the chime 30 and includes a pull tab 34 to facilitate detaching the removable lid 32 from the chime 30. However, it should be understood that other mechanisms and methods for removing the removable lid 32 from the chime 30 are equally acceptable. The chime 30/lid 32 construction is, in one embodiment, in accordance with conventional designs in which the chime 30/lid 32 is simultaneously formed from metal and provided with a score-line (or partial cut) to facilitate separation of the lid 32 from the chime 30 by a user. Alternately, the lid 32 can be eliminated. As a point of reference, when the container 22 has the lid 32 attached, the container 22 and the lid 32 combine as shown to form a full panel, easy-open container.
One embodiment of the overcap 24 is shown in greater detail in
The shoulder 50 can assume a variety of configurations that may or may not include one or both of the transition segments 52 and/or the rib structure 54, and/or additional structure(s). Regardless, and with specific reference to
In addition to defining a portion of the channel 110, in some embodiments the shoulder 50 is configured to enhance an overall rigidity of the overcap 24 (as compared to conventional microwaveable packaging overcaps) when assembled to the container 22 (
The rib structure 54 provides surface adapted to facilitate stacking of one overcap 24 over another. In particular, the rib structure 54 defines a guide surface 120 that, combined with a ledge 122 defined by the skirt 60, forms a stacking feature. The stacking feature is configured such that a first overcap 24 can be stacked over and onto a second overcap 24 (such as within a magazine of an assembly apparatus) by sliding the skirt 60 of the first overcap 24 over and along the guide surface 120 and into nested contact with the ledge 122 of the second overcap 24. To this end, extension of the guide surface 120 from the ledge 122 forms a stacking angle S. It has surprisingly been found that by forming the stacking angle S to be greater than 90 degrees, ease of stacking one overcap 24 to a second overcap 24 is enhanced. In one embodiment, the stacking angle S is in the range of 90-110 degrees, more preferably approximately 100 degrees, although other angles are also acceptable. Further, in one embodiment, a height of the rib structure 54 relative to the ledge 122 is in the range of 0.04-0.10 inch, preferably 0.065-0.085 inch, more preferably approximately 0.0745 inch (although other dimensions are also acceptable). It has surprisingly been found that this one preferred height combined with the one preferred stacking angle S (described above) optimally facilitates overcap 24 stacking. Alternatively, the rib structure 54 can assume other configurations.
In addition to the ledge 122, in one embodiment, the skirt 60 forms one or more clip(s) 62 as projections from an interior skirt surface 64. The clip(s) 62 is configured to facilitate snap-fit of the overcap 24 over the chime 30 (
As previously described, the neck 70 is formed opposite the skirt 60 and forms (or extends to) the drip bead 90. The drip bead 90 descends relative to the interior surface 100 of the shoulder 50 by a distance D. The distance D is defined as the distance between a leading end 112 of the drip bead 90 and the interior surface 100 of the shoulder 50. With this convention in mind, the drip bead 90 is offset from the skirt 60, and thus defines a height (i.e., the distance D) of the channel 110. To this end, in one embodiment the distance D is greater than 0.01 inch, preferably the distance D is greater than 0.02 inch, and more preferably the distance D is greater than 0.023 inch. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, the distance D that the drip bead 90 descends relative to the interior surface 100 of the shoulder 50 is approximately 0.0257 inch. As will be made clearer below, the distance D equates to an effective length the drip bead 90 extends within the container 22 (
In addition to the drip bead 90, the neck 70 forms a nesting feature in one embodiment. In particular, the neck 70 defines an exterior surface 132 that extends from the shoulder 50/transition segment 52 at a nesting angle N (relative to the ledge 122 or a horizontal plane of the overcap 24 when the overcap 24 is in the upright orientation of
Finally, and as best shown in
In one embodiment, the panel 80 includes an annular flange 140 and a central portion 142 connected to the annular flange 140. The annular flange 140 and the central portion 142 combine to form a stacking recess 144. The stacking recess 144 is configured to accept the base 26 (
The overcap 24 can be constructed of any microwave-compatible material that is sufficiently stiff to thus resist buckling when one or more other packaged good articles 20 (
In particular, during microwave heating (i.e., with the lid 32 (
When boiling is achieved, the consumable item 38 (
Another aspect of the overcap 24 relates to enhanced structural integrity during normal shipping activities as best described with reference to
With the above in mind, the overcap 24 is capable of withstanding relatively large loading forces F and can resist deformation that would otherwise damage the known, prior overcaps. In particular, when the overcap 24 is assembled to the container 22, the chime 30 is received within the channel 110 (
First, when the chime 30 is nested within the channel 110 (
In addition, in one embodiment, the shoulder 50 is relatively thick in cross-section (especially as compared to prior art microwaveable overcaps) as previously described. This increased thickness enhances a stiffness of the neck 70, thus supporting the neck 70 against possible buckling in response to the force F.
It has been surprisingly discovered that the overcap 24 of the present invention coupled to the container 22 can maintain its structural integrity in the presence of an axial force F in excess of approximately 50 pounds. It has been found that known prior art overcaps exhibit irreversible damage under similar conditions. Notably, the enhanced integrity of the overcap 24 is achieved while minimizing a thickness of the neck 70 (and thus optimizing material costs) for example, on the order of 0.020-0.030 inch. The neck 70 can have other shapes that further heighten a stiffness of the neck 70.
Further, in other alternative embodiments, a thickness of the shoulder 50/transition segment 52 can be further increased (as compared to disclosed embodiments) to enhance overall rigidity. For example,
The microwaveable packaged good article, and in particular the overcap, of the present invention provides a marked improvement over previous designs. The unsightly, and possibly dangerous, problems associated with undesired product drippage along an exterior of the container is virtually eliminated. Further, the overcap of the present invention is highly robust and maintains its structural integrity under the rigors of most packaging/distribution conditions.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific overcap embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of overcaps for microwaveable packaged good articles. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of Provisional Patent Application No. 60/622,892, filed on Oct. 28, 2004, and entitled “Microwaveable Packaged Good Article Overcap”, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2533159 | Yates | Oct 1948 | A |
3411660 | LaFarge | Nov 1968 | A |
3572413 | Livingstone | Mar 1971 | A |
3670951 | Smith | Jun 1972 | A |
3721365 | Saunders | Mar 1973 | A |
3741431 | Burdick | Jun 1973 | A |
3753512 | Curry | Aug 1973 | A |
3809284 | Churan | May 1974 | A |
3883036 | Mahaffy | May 1975 | A |
3904072 | Whiteside | Sep 1975 | A |
3995766 | Fralick | Dec 1976 | A |
4006837 | Gates | Feb 1977 | A |
4027776 | Douglas | Jun 1977 | A |
4079857 | Crisci | Mar 1978 | A |
4187953 | Turner | Feb 1980 | A |
4201311 | Underwood | May 1980 | A |
4380305 | Von Holdt | Apr 1983 | A |
4399926 | Eidels-Dubovoy | Aug 1983 | A |
4407426 | McLaren et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4418832 | Schneider | Dec 1983 | A |
4421244 | Van Melle | Dec 1983 | A |
4520943 | Nielsen | Jun 1985 | A |
4535905 | Sandhaus | Aug 1985 | A |
4709832 | Mantyla | Dec 1987 | A |
4723676 | Kobayashi | Feb 1988 | A |
4756443 | Murayama | Jul 1988 | A |
4793510 | Arfert | Dec 1988 | A |
4846366 | Satz | Jul 1989 | A |
4886184 | Chamourian | Dec 1989 | A |
4923085 | Lillelund | May 1990 | A |
5094706 | Howe | Mar 1992 | A |
D345081 | Adami et al. | Mar 1994 | S |
5390810 | Stroble | Feb 1995 | A |
5411160 | Goulet | May 1995 | A |
5411161 | Fish, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5452818 | Yost | Sep 1995 | A |
5538154 | Von Holdt | Jul 1996 | A |
5582317 | Wermund | Dec 1996 | A |
5680952 | Chasten | Oct 1997 | A |
5725123 | Otto-Nagels | Mar 1998 | A |
6015061 | Lowry | Jan 2000 | A |
6056144 | Strange | May 2000 | A |
6056145 | Rush | May 2000 | A |
6164484 | Fiore | Dec 2000 | A |
6168044 | Zettle | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220471 | Lowry | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260729 | Mitchell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6685049 | Paladino | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6688487 | Oakes | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729491 | Morris | May 2004 | B2 |
6851569 | Conti | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860397 | Walters, Jr. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7112771 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20020148846 | Luburic | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030015542 | Nulty | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030085228 | Oakes | May 2003 | A1 |
20030222083 | Pladsbjerg | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030222084 | Morris, Jr. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040011803 | D'Amato | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040094553 | Crider | May 2004 | A1 |
20040206765 | McMahon, III | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040262309 | Edwards | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050061815 | Wong | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050145627 | Stull et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060032857 | Stensbol et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060091140 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60622892 | Oct 2004 | US |