Microwell design and fabrication for generation of cell culture aggregates

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12203059
  • Patent Number
    12,203,059
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 22, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 21, 2025
    a month ago
Abstract
A cell culture apparatus may include a substrate defining a well. The well may define an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir. The substrate may define a thickness between the interior and exterior surfaces that has a thickness proximate the nadir that is greater than or equal to a thickness proximate the upper aperture.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to apparatuses, systems and methods for culturing cells.


TECHNICAL BACKGROUND

Cell culture techniques that encourage formation of 3D aggregates or spheroids have been strongly advocated over traditional monolayer culture techniques due to the increased number of applications. However, some conventional cell culture apparatuses currently used in forming spheroids make imaging techniques difficult.


BRIEF SUMMARY

In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, apparatuses having wells for use in culturing cells to promote the formation of spheroids are described herein. Embodiments of apparatuses described herein have well geometries which minimize light distortion that can occur in conventional apparatuses used for culturing spheroids, allowing for improved imaging quality of spheroids grown in the wells.


In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture apparatus having a substrate defining a well. The well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir. The substrate defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface. A thickness of the substrate proximate to the nadir is greater than or equal to a thickness of the substrate proximate to the upper aperture.


In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture apparatus including a reservoir comprising a bottom and an enclosing sidewall. The bottom is defined by a plurality of wells. Each well of the plurality of wells defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir. The well defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface. A thickness of the well proximate to the nadir is greater than or equal to a thickness of the well proximate to the upper aperture.


In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture apparatus including a substrate defining a well. The well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir. The substrate defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface. The thickness is configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface and out of the exterior surface when the well contains a water-based composition. In embodiments, the water-based composition is a composition employed in cell culture or cell assays. For example, a water-based composition can include a cell culture medium, buffers or other solutions or mixtures employed in cell assays.


In various embodiments, the disclosure describes a cell culture apparatus includes a substrate defining a well. The well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir. A shape of the exterior surface is configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface and out of the exterior surface.


In some embodiments, provided herein is a cell culture apparatus comprising: a substrate defining a well, wherein the well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir, wherein the substrate defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface, wherein a thickness of the substrate proximate to the nadir is greater than or equal to a thickness of the substrate proximate to the upper aperture. In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate proximate to the nadir is greater than the thickness of the substrate proximate to the upper aperture. In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate increases continuously from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir. In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate proximate to the nadir is equal to the thickness of the substrate proximate to the upper aperture. In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate remains constant from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir.


In some embodiments, the well defines an axis between the nadir and a center of the upper aperture, wherein the well is rotationally symmetrical about the axis.


In some embodiments, the upper aperture defines a distance across the upper aperture, wherein the distance across the upper aperture is in a range from 100 micrometers to 3000 micrometers.


In some embodiments, the thickness of the substrate at any location from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir is in a range from 10 micrometers to 1000 micrometers.


In some embodiments, the interior surface is defined by a hemispherical shape, wherein the hemispherical shape defines a radius in a range from 50 micrometers to 1500 micrometers.


In some embodiments, the exterior surface is configured to transmit light with a divergent angle smaller than the numerical aperture of the imaging system. For example for 4× Plan Achromat magnification objective with numerical aperture 0.1, light should pass substantially parallel (i.e., 5.7° or less) to a direction that the light was received by the interior surface when the well contains a cell culture medium. In general, the maximum divergence angle of the light passing through the well with cell culture should not exceed the acceptance cone of an objective.


In some embodiments, the shape of the interior surface and the shape of the exterior surface are configured to minimize refraction of light that passes there between when the well contains a cell culture medium.


In some embodiments, the well is non-adherent to cells.


In some embodiments, the interior surface is configured such that cells cultured therein form a spheroid.


Also provided herein is a cell culture apparatus comprising: a reservoir comprising a bottom and an enclosing sidewall, wherein the bottom is defined by a plurality of wells, wherein each well of the plurality of wells defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir, wherein the well defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface, wherein a thickness of the well proximate to the nadir is greater than or equal to a thickness of the well proximate to the upper aperture.


Further provided herein is a cell culture apparatus comprising: a substrate defining a well, wherein the well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir, wherein the substrate defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface, wherein the thickness is configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface and out of the exterior surface when the well contains a water-based composition.


Further provided herein is a cell culture apparatus comprising: a substrate defining a well, wherein the well defines an interior surface, an exterior surface, an upper aperture and a nadir, wherein a shape of the exterior surface is configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface and out of the exterior surface.


Further provided herein are uses of any of the above for the growth and/or imaging or assessment of cells (e.g., spheroids).


Additional features and advantages of the subject matter of the present disclosure will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the subject matter of the present disclosure as described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.


It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description present embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the subject matter of the present disclosure as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the subject matter of the present disclosure, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the subject matter of the present disclosure. Additionally, the drawings and descriptions are meant to be merely illustrative, and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any manner.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosure can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a cell culture apparatus including a plurality of wells.



FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of one well of a cell culture apparatus.



FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of one well of a cell culture apparatus.



FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of one well of a cell culture apparatus.



FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of one well of a cell culture apparatus.



FIGS. 4A-4D are X-ray computed tomography images of the wells of FIG. 3A.



FIGS. 5A-5D are X-ray computed tomography images of the wells of FIG. 2B.



FIG. 6A is a bright field microscopy image of the wells of FIG. 3A.



FIG. 6B is a bright field microscopy image of the wells of FIG. 2B.



FIG. 7 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a reservoir including a plurality of wells.



FIG. 8 is a schematic side view of a deforming process for fabrication of thin wall wells.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in greater detail to various embodiments of the subject matter of the present disclosure, some embodiments of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Like numbers used in the figures refer to like components, steps and the like. However, it will be understood that the use of a number to refer to a component in a given figure is not intended to limit the component in another figure labeled with the same number. In addition, the use of different numbers to refer to components is not intended to indicate that the different numbered components cannot be the same or similar to other numbered components.


The present disclosure describes, among other things, cell culture apparatuses having a structured bottom surface defining a shape of a plurality of wells or microwells. In some embodiments, a substrate forming the wells can comprise an exterior surface that defines an external surface of the apparatus. The shape of the external surface can be controlled to facilitate imaging of cells within the wells in accordance with various embodiments described herein.


In some embodiments, the wells may be configured such that cells cultured in the wells form spheroids. For example, the wells may be non-adherent to cells to cause the cells in the wells to associate with each other and form spheres. The spheroids may expand to size limits imposed by the geometry of the cells. In some embodiments, the wells may be coated with an ultra-low binding material to make the wells non-adherent to cells.


In some embodiments, the inner surface of the wells may be non-adherent to cells. The wells may be formed from non-adherent material or may be coated with non-adherent material to form a non-adherent well. In some embodiments, the non-adherent material may be described as an ultra-low-adhesion material. Examples of non-adherent material include perfluorinated polymers, olefins, or like polymers or mixtures thereof. Other examples may include agarose, non-ionic hydrogels such as polyacrylamides, or like materials or mixtures thereof. The combination of, for example, non-adherent wells, well geometry, and gravity may induce cells cultured in the wells to self-assembly into spheroids.


However, well geometries that can be useful for culturing spheroids can be difficult to image, either manually or via automated processes, with conventional microscopy techniques due to light distortions introduced through lens like effects by each individual well.


The well or well array design described herein may make image analysis of in vitro 3-dimensional spheroid based assays or spheroid production possible or more feasible. The cross-sectional profile of an individual well may have an impact on quality of imaging capabilities, e.g., microscope imaging capabilities. Specifically, controlling the well thickness and outer shape of the well may help compensate for light path deviation during imaging to improve image quality and may make the cell culture system amenable to high content imaging screening. As a result, the well thickness and outer shape of the well may lead to a well that is optically active due to the lens shape. In other words, the well may be able to utilize one or a variety of light sources and still produce uniform illumination of the cells in the well. In some embodiments, an improved illumination may allow for a shorter focal length, which may increase the NA of the system and allow image acquisition at higher magnifications.


A variety of well characteristics may have a significant impact on imaging quality. For example, dimensions and shape of an interior surface of the well, dimensions and shape of an exterior surface of the well, optical properties of the material defining the well, the thickness profile of the material defining the well, etc. can all play a role in high quality microscopy imaging. Additionally, the refractive index of a material may have a significant impact on imaging quality in both reflective and transmittance microscopy applications. For example, in the case of many cell culture imaging applications, the most common material that is in contact with the interior surface of the well is a water-based solution with a refractive index of 1.33 and the most common material for the well fabrication is polystyrene with a refractive index of 1.59. The differences in refractive indexes of the two materials may cause any incident light beam to deflect/reflect and may result in a negative impact on the microscope image quality.


One way to improve the quality of cell culture images may be to correct the light distortion. The light distortion may be corrected by controlling and varying the well characteristics discussed above. Specifically, the dimensions and shape of the interior and exterior surfaces of the well and the thickness profile of the material defining the well. Previously published fabrication methods have focused on the dimensions and shape of the interior surface of the well, especially, the interior surface that defines the dimensions of the 3D cellular aggregates. However, adjusting any of these characteristics in relation to one another may help to compensate for any light distortion that may occur during imaging (e.g., microscopy, etc.). More specifically, and as described herein, the light distortion may be corrected by controlling the shape and dimensions of the exterior surface of the well. In other words, the ability to change the shape and dimensions of the exterior surface may be utilized to help control the angle at which incident light exits the exterior surface.


A cell culture apparatus 100 including a plurality of wells 115 is shown in FIG. 1. The plurality of wells 115 may be defined by a substrate 110, e.g., a polymeric material. Each well 115 may define an interior surface 120, an exterior surface 114, an upper aperture 118, a nadir 116, and an upper edge 121. The substrate 110 may define a thickness 111 between the interior surface 120 and the exterior surface 114. The wells 115 may have a depth d defined by a height from the nadir 116 to the upper aperture 118. The wells 115 may also have a diametric dimension w, such as a diameter, width, etc., across the well 115 defined by the upper aperture 118.


In some embodiments, the wells 115 described herein may define a diametric dimension w of about, e.g., greater than or equal to 100 micrometers, greater than or equal to 300 micrometers, greater than or equal to 500 micrometers, greater than or equal to 800 micrometers, greater than or equal to 1200 micrometers, etc. or, less than or equal to 3000 micrometers, less than or equal to 2600 micrometers, less than or equal to 2200 micrometers, less than or equal to 1800 micrometers, less than or equal to 1500 micrometers, etc., including ranges between any of the foregoing values. Such diametric dimensions can control the size of a spheroid grown therein such that cells at the interior of the spheroid are maintained in a healthy state. In some embodiments, the wells 115 may define a depth d, by way of example, greater than or equal to 100 micrometers, greater than or equal to 300 micrometers, greater than or equal to 500 micrometers, greater than or equal to 800 micrometers, greater than or equal to 1200 micrometers, etc. or, less than or equal to 3000 micrometers, less than or equal to 2600 micrometers, less than or equal to 2200 micrometers, less than or equal to 1800 micrometers, less than or equal to 1500 micrometers, etc., including ranges between any of the foregoing values. Of course, other suitable dimensions may also be employed.


The exterior surface of the well may be a variety of shapes. For example, the shape of the exterior surface may be configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface of the well and out of the exterior surface of the well or vice versa. In other words, the light passing out of the exterior surface of the well is substantially parallel to the light passing into the interior surface and/or the shape of the exterior surface may be configured to minimize refraction of light that passes between the interior and exterior surfaces and/or the exterior surface may be configured to transmit light substantially parallel to a direction that the light was received by the interior surface of the well. In some embodiments, the well contains a cell culture medium, and the shape of the exterior surface corrects for refraction.


The thickness of the substrate between the interior surface of the well and the exterior surface of the well may vary. For example, the thickness of the substrate may be configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface of the well and out of the exterior surface of the well or vice versa. In other words, the light passing out of the exterior surface of the well is substantially parallel to the light passing into the interior surface or the thickness of the substrate may be configured to minimize refraction of light that passes there between. In some embodiments, the well contains a cell culture medium when the thickness of the substrate corrects for refraction.


The cross-sections of two wells 200 that define an exterior surface 214 that does not correct for refraction are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. In other words, light that enters 201 the interior surface 220 of the well 200 is not parallel with light that exits 202 the exterior surface 214 of the well 200.


As shown in FIG. 2A, the thickness of the substrate 210 proximate the nadir 216 is less than the thickness of the substrate 210 proximate the upper edge 221 of the well 200. The thickness of the substrate 210 proximate the upper edge 221 of the well 200 may be defined as a thickness between the interior surface 220 and the exterior surface 214 on a same plane as the upper aperture 218. As shown in FIG. 2B, the exterior surface 214 of the well 200 defines a rectangular shaped bottom of the substrate 210 that creates a flat exterior surface of the well 200.


In some embodiments, the thickness and shape of the substrate, e.g., a polymeric material, that defines the well may be configured to correct for refraction of light passing into the interior surface of the well and out of the exterior surface of the well. The cross-sections of two embodiments of wells 115 that define an exterior surface 114 that does correct for refraction are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. In other words, light that enters 201 the interior surface 120 of the well 115 is parallel with light that exits 202 the exterior surface 114 of the well 115. In yet other words, a shape of the interior surface 120 of the well 115 and a shape of the exterior surface 114 of the well 115 are configured to minimize the effects of the refraction of light that passes there between.


As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the thickness 111 of the substrate 110 proximate the nadir 116 may be greater than or equal to the thickness 109 of the substrate 110 proximate the upper aperture 118. The thickness of the substrate 110 proximate the nadir 116 may be defined as a distance between the interior surface 120 and the exterior surface 114 at a lowest point of the well 115. The thickness of the substrate 110 proximate the upper aperture 118 may be defined as a thickness between the interior surface 120 and the exterior surface 114 on a same plane as the upper aperture 118.


Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3A, the thickness of the substrate 110 remains constant from proximate the upper aperture 118 to the nadir 116 and, as shown in FIG. 3B, the thickness 111 of the substrate 110 proximate the nadir 116 is greater than the thickness 109 of the substrate 110 proximate the upper aperture 118. Also, as shown in FIG. 3A, the thickness 111 of the substrate 110 proximate to the nadir 116 may be equal to the thickness 109 of the substrate 110 proximate the upper aperture 118. The substrate thicknesses shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B allow for an incoming light 201 entering the interior surface 120 to be substantially parallel to an outgoing light 202 leaving the exterior surface 114.


In other embodiments, the substrate thickness may be described as increasing continuously from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir (e.g., FIG. 3B). The thickness of the substrate proximate any location from the upper aperture to the nadir may be defined by a thickness of, e.g., greater than or equal to 5 micrometers, greater than or equal to 10 micrometers, greater than or equal to 20 micrometers, greater than or equal to 40 micrometers, greater than or equal to 60 micrometers, etc. or, less than or equal to 100 micrometers, less than or equal to 90 micrometers, less than or equal to 80 micrometers, less than or equal to 65 micrometers, less than or equal to 50 micrometers, etc., including ranges between any of the foregoing values. In some embodiments, the thickness is about 1000 micrometers or less. In some embodiments, the thickness is in a range from 10 micrometers to 1000 micrometers.


In some embodiments, the well may define an axis 105 between the nadir and a center of the upper aperture and the well may be rotationally symmetrical about the axis 105 (see, e.g., FIG. 1). For example, a hemispherical shape may define the well. The hemispherical shape may be defined by a radius of about, e.g., greater than or equal to 50 micrometers, greater than or equal to 150 micrometers, greater than or equal to 250 micrometers, greater than or equal to 400 micrometers, greater than or equal to 600 micrometers, etc. or, less than or equal to 1500 micrometers, less than or equal to 1300 micrometers, less than or equal to 1100 micrometers, less than or equal to 900 micrometers, less than or equal to 750 micrometers, etc.


Orthogonal views of 3D datasets of X-ray computed tomography images of wells of generally as depicted in FIG. 3A are shown in FIGS. 4A-4D. The images depict wells 115 defining a convex exterior surface 114 as described in FIG. 3A. FIG. 4A depicts a cross sectional view of three complete wells 115 along horizontal line 117, shown in FIG. 4C. FIG. 4C is a top view of a portion of a cell culture apparatus with an array of wells 115. FIG. 4B is a cross sectional view of wells 115 along vertical line 119 shown in FIG. 4C. FIG. 4D is a reconstituted 3D image of a portion of a cell culture apparatus with an array of wells 115.


Orthogonal views of 3D datasets of X-ray computed tomography images of wells of generally as depicted in FIG. 2B are shown in FIGS. 5A-5D. The images depict wells 115 defining a flat exterior surface 114 as described in FIG. 2B. FIG. 5A depicts a cross sectional view of wells 115 along horizontal line 117 shown in FIG. 5C. FIG. 5C of a portion of a cell culture apparatus with an array of wells 115. FIG. 5B is a cross sectional view of wells 115 along vertical line 119 shown in FIG. 5C. FIG. 5D is a reconstituted 3D image of a portion of a cell culture apparatus with an array of wells 115.


Bright field microscopy images of wells 115 having shapes generally in accordance with FIGS. 3A and 2B are shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, respectively. The microscopy images of FIG. 6A shows light that passed through wells having a shape as depicted in FIG. 3A. The microscopy images of FIG. 6B shows light that passed through wells having a shape as depicted in FIG. 2B. The shape of the well as depicted in FIG. 3A did not substantially reflect/deflect and thus yielded a relatively uniform signal across all wells as compared to the signal across wells having a shape as depicted in FIG. 2B. More light was received by the microscope camera for wells having a shape as depicted in FIG. 3A (see FIG. 6A) than the wells having a shape as depicted in FIG. 2B as shown in microscopy images of FIG. 6B. In other words, the well microscopy images of FIG. 6B depicts that more light was scattered, as shown by the dark rings, than the well microscopy images of FIG. 6A.


As shown in FIG. 7, the cell culture apparatus 700 may include a reservoir 725.


The reservoir may include a bottom 705 and an enclosing sidewall 720. The bottom 705 may be defined by a plurality of wells 715. Each well 715 may have similar characteristics as wells described herein (see, e.g., FIGS. 1, 3A, and 3B).


In some embodiments, the exterior surface of the well is optimized through ray tracing for diffraction limited imaging performance when viewed under high resolution microscopy (e.g., bright field, fluorescence, confocal, or other microscopy modalities). For example, with reference to FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B, the exterior surface 214 is optimized through ray tracing.


To illustrate this approach, an interior surface of a polystyrene well may be a hemisphere with a radius of 500 micrometers and a center thickness of 150 micrometers. The diameter of a spheroid may be 300 micrometers, and a 20× microscope with an objective numerical aperture of 0.4 is employed. There may be a number of image points across positions of the spheroid, for example, center, 50 micrometers from the center, 100 micrometers from the center, and 150 micrometers from the center. In such instances, most images taken will be sub-optimum. Spot diagrams can be generated from the different field positions and compared to the diffraction limited Airy circle at the image plane to assess image quality. If the exterior surface is flat, as illustrated in FIG. 2B, the spot diameters across the field are a few times larger than the diffraction limit, indicating poor image quality. When the well has a uniform thickness, the image quality is considerably better than the previous case. However, diffraction limited imaging performance is barely achieved within the center 50 micrometer radius. Outside this field of view, astigmatism deteriorates the image quality. However, by optimizing the radius of curvature of the exterior surface to 0.518 mm, the image quality can achieve diffraction limited performance across the entire spheroid diameter, although a small amount of distortion and astigmatism still exist. To further optimize the image quality, an aspheric exterior surface is used. With a radius of curvature R=0.682 mm and a conic constant of K=−3.09, the residual aberration and distortion throughout the entire field of interest are removed. The conic surface is given by:

y2−2Rx+(K+1)x2=0.


Diffraction limited performance is also maintained in the entire volume of the spheroid. This enables high resolution confocal imaging in any locations within the spheroid. The actual magnification is 21.5× due to the refractive effect of the surface.


In some embodiments, nested wells are employed, whereby a first well or layer of wells is present above a second well or layer of wells. Well sidewalls of each well are selected such that light passing through two or more layers of wells remains substantially parallel to the original light.


Any suitable process can be used to fabricate cell culture apparatuses having wells as described herein. For example, a substrate can be molded to form the well or structured surface, a substrate film can be embossed to form the well or structured surface, or the like. In some embodiments, a deforming process is used to fabricate wells as described herein.


For example and with reference to FIG. 8, a schematic side view of a deforming process for fabrication of wells is shown. For example, FIG. 8 illustrates a hot embossing and film deforming process 800 for the fabrication of thin wall wells. The process uses a thin film 820 and applies heat and pressure 810 down onto the thin film 820 into the mold 830. The thin film 820 may have a specific thickness that results in a given thickness attributed to different sections of the wells. For example, a 70 micrometer thin film after going through a process of hot embossing and film deforming may have a uniform thickness of 25 micrometers at a bottom part of the well and upper part of the well. This outcome is similar to the well shown in FIG. 3A, which can sufficiently correct for light refraction. As a result, the hot embossing and film deforming process may be actively controlled during well fabrication to form wells that correct light refraction sufficiently similar to those in FIGS. 3A-3B. The well fabrication process may also be performed in planar configuration or as a roll to roll process.


Cell culture apparatuses having wells or structured surfaces as described herein can be formed from any suitable material. Preferably, materials intended to contact cells or culture media are compatible with the cells and the media. Typically, cell culture components (e.g., wells) are formed from polymeric material. Examples of suitable polymeric materials include polystyrene, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl chloride, polycarbonate, polysulfone, polystyrene copolymers, fluoropolymers, polyesters, polyamides, polystyrene butadiene copolymers, fully hydrogenated styrenic polymers, polycarbonate PDMS copolymers, and polyolefins such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl pentene, polypropylene copolymers and cyclic olefin copolymers, and the like.


Cells cultured in three dimensions, such as spheroids, can exhibit more in vivo like functionality than their counterparts cultured in two dimensions as monolayers. In two dimensional cell culture systems, cells can attach to a substrate on which they are cultured. However, when cells are grown in three dimensions, such as spheroids, the cells interact with each other rather than attaching to the substrate. Cells cultured in three dimensions more closely resemble in vivo tissue in terms of cellular communication and the development of extracellular matrices. Spheroids thus provide a superior model for cell migration, differentiation, survival, and growth and therefore provide better systems for research, diagnostics, and drug efficacy, pharmacology, and toxicity testing.


In some embodiments, the devices are configured such that cells cultured in the devices form spheroids. For example, the wells in which cells are grown can be non-adherent to cells to cause the cells in the wells to associate with each other and form spheres. The spheroids expand to size limits imposed by the geometry of the wells. In some embodiments, the wells are coated with an ultra-low binding material to make the wells non-adherent to cells.


Examples of non-adherent material include perfluorinated polymers, olefins, or like polymers or mixtures thereof. Other examples include agarose, non-ionic hydrogels such as polyacrylamides, polyethers such as polyethylene oxide and polyols such as polyvinyl alcohol, or like materials or mixtures thereof. The combination of, for example, non-adherent wells, well geometry (e.g., size and shape), and/or gravity induce cells cultured in the wells to self-assemble into spheroids. Some spheroids maintain differentiated cell function indicative of a more in vivo-like, response relative to cells grown in a monolayer. Other cells types, such as mesenchymal stromal cells, when cultured as spheroids retain their pluripotency.


In some embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods herein comprise one or more cells. In some embodiments, the cells are cryopreserved. In some embodiments, the cells are in three dimensional culture. In some such embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods comprise one or more spheroids. In some embodiments, one or more of the cells are actively dividing. In some embodiments, the systems, devices, and methods comprise culture media (e.g., comprising nutrients (e.g., proteins, peptides, amino acids), energy (e.g., carbohydrates), essential metals and minerals (e.g., calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphates, sulphates), buffering agents (e.g., phosphates, acetates), indicators for pH change (e.g., phenol red, bromo-cresol purple), selective agents (e.g., chemicals, antimicrobial agents), etc.). In some embodiments, one or more test compounds (e.g., drug) are included in the systems, devices, and methods.


A wide variety of cell types may be cultured. In some embodiments, a spheroid contains a single cell type. In some embodiments, a spheroid contains more than one cell type. In some embodiments, where more than one spheroid is grown, each spheroid is of the same type, while in other embodiments, two or more different types of spheroids are grown. Cells grown in spheroids may be natural cells or altered cells (e.g., cell comprising one or more non-natural genetic alterations). In some embodiments, the cell is a somatic cell. In some embodiments, the cell is a stem cell or progenitor cell (e.g., embryonic stem cell, induced pluripotent stem cell) in any desired state of differentiation (e.g., pluripotent, multi-potent, fate determined, immortalized, etc.). In some embodiments, the cell is a disease cell or disease model cell. For example, in some embodiments, the spheroid comprises one or more types of cancer cells or cells that can be induced into a hyper-proliferative state (e.g., transformed cells). Cells may be from or derived from any desired tissue or organ type, including but not limited to, adrenal, bladder, blood vessel, bone, bone marrow, brain, cartilage, cervical, corneal, endometrial, esophageal, gastrointestinal, immune system (e.g., T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, leukocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells), liver, lung, lymphatic, muscle (e.g., cardiac muscle), neural, ovarian, pancreatic (e.g., islet cells), pituitary, prostate, renal, salivary, skin, tendon, testicular, and thyroid. In some embodiments, the cells are mammalian cells (e.g., human, mice, rat, rabbit, dog, cat, cow, pig, chicken, goat, horse, etc.).


The cultured cells find use in a wide variety of research, diagnostic, drug screening and testing, therapeutic, and industrial applications.


In some embodiments, the cells are used for production of proteins or viruses. Systems, devices, and methods that culture large numbers of spheroids in parallel are particularly effective for protein production. Three-dimensional culture allows for increased cell density, and higher protein yield per square centimeter of cell growth surface area. Any desired protein or viruses for vaccine production may be grown in the cells and isolated or purified for use as desired. In some embodiments, the protein is a native protein to the cells. In some embodiments, the protein is non-native. In some embodiments, the protein is expressed recombinantly. Preferably, the protein is overexpressed using a non-native promoter. The protein may be expressed as a fusion protein. In some embodiments, a purification or detection tag is expressed as a fusion partner to a protein of interest to facilitate its purification and/or detection. In some embodiments, fusions are expressed with a cleavable linker to allow separation of the fusion partners after purification.


In some embodiments, the protein is a therapeutic protein. Such proteins include, but are not limited to, proteins and peptides that replace a protein that is deficient or abnormal (e.g., insulin), augment an existing pathway (e.g., inhibitors or agonists), provide a novel function or activity, interfere with a molecule or organism, or deliver other compounds or proteins (e.g., radionuclides, cytotoxic drugs, effector proteins, etc.). In some embodiments, the protein is an immunoglobulin such as an antibody (e.g., monoclonal antibody) of any type (e.g., humanized, bi-specific, multi-specific, etc.). Therapeutic protein categories include, but are not limited to, antibody-based drugs, Fc fusion proteins, anticoagulants, antigens, blood factor, bone morphogenetic proteins, engineered protein scaffolds, enzymes, growth factors, hormones, interferons, interleukins, and thrombolytics. Therapeutic proteins may be used to prevent or treat cancers, immune disorders, metabolic disorders, inherited genetic disorders, infections, and other diseases and conditions.


In some embodiments, the protein is a diagnostic protein. Diagnostic proteins include, but are not limited to, antibodies, affinity binding partners (e.g., receptor-binding ligands), inhibitors, antagonists, and the like. In some embodiments, the diagnostic protein is expressed with or is a detectable moiety (e.g., fluorescent moiety, luminescent moiety (e.g., luciferase), colorimetric moiety, etc.).


In some embodiments, the protein is an industrial protein. Industrial proteins include, but are not limited to, food components, industrial enzymes, agricultural proteins, analytical enzymes, etc.


In some embodiments, the cells are used for drug discovery, characterization, efficacy testing, and toxicity testing. Such testing includes, but is not limited to, pharmacological effect assessment, carcinogenicity assessment, medical imaging agent characteristic assessment, half-life assessment, radiation safety assessment, genotoxicity testing, immunotoxicity testing, reproductive and developmental testing, drug interaction assessment, dose assessment, adsorption assessment, disposition assessment, metabolism assessment, elimination studies, etc. Specific cells types may be employed for specific tests (e.g., hepatocytes for liver toxicity, renal proximal tubule epithelial cells for nephrotoxicity, vascular endothelial cells for vascular toxicity, neuronal and glial cells for neurotoxicity, cardiomyocytes for cardiotoxicity, skeletal myocytes for rhabdomyolysis, etc.). Treated cells may be assessed for any number of desired parameters including, but not limited to, membrane integrity, cellular metabolite content, mitochondrial functions, lysosomal functions, apoptosis, genetic alterations, gene expression differences, and the like.


In some embodiments, the cell culture devices are a component of a larger system. In some embodiments, the system comprises a plurality (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, . . . , 10, . . . , 20, . . . , 50, . . . , 100, . . . , 1000, etc.) of such cell culture devices. In some embodiments, the system comprises an incubator for maintaining the culture devices at optimal culture conditions (e.g., temperature, atmosphere, humidity, etc.). In some embodiments, the system comprises detectors for imaging or otherwise analyzing cells. Such detectors include, but are not limited to, fluorimeters, luminometers, cameras, microscopes, plate readers (e.g., PERKIN ELMER ENVISION plate reader; PERKIN ELMER VIEWLUX plate reader), cell analyzers (e.g., GE IN Cell Analyzer 2000 and 2200; THERMO/CELLOMICS CELLNSIGHT High Content Screening Platform), and confocal imaging systems (e.g., PERKIN ELMER OPERAPHENIX high throughput content screening system; GE INCELL 6000 Cell Imaging System). In some embodiments, the system comprises perfusion systems or other components for supplying, re-supplying, and circulating culture media or other components to cultured cells. In some embodiments, the system comprises robotic components (e.g., pipettes, arms, plate movers, etc.) for automating the handing, use, and/or analysis of culture devices.


All scientific and technical terms used herein have meanings commonly used in the art unless otherwise specified. The definitions provided herein are to facilitate understanding of certain terms used frequently herein and are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure.


As used herein, singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a “structured bottom surface” includes examples having two or more such “structured bottom surfaces” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. The term “and/or” means one or all of the listed elements or a combination of any two or more of the listed elements.


As used herein, “have”, “has”, “having”, “include”, “includes”, “including”, “comprise”, “comprises”, “comprising” or the like are used in their open ended inclusive sense, and generally mean “include, but not limited to”, “includes, but not limited to”, or “including, but not limited to”.


“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event, circumstance, or component, can or cannot occur, and that the description includes instances where the event, circumstance, or component, occurs and instances where it does not.


The words “preferred” and “preferably” refer to embodiments of the disclosure that may afford certain benefits, under certain circumstances. However, other embodiments may also be preferred, under the same or other circumstances. Furthermore, the recitation of one or more preferred embodiments does not imply that other embodiments are not useful, and is not intended to exclude other embodiments from the scope of the inventive technology.


Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, examples include from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another aspect. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.


Also herein, the recitations of numerical ranges by endpoints include all numbers subsumed within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, 5, etc.). Where a range of values is “greater than”, “less than”, etc. a particular value, that value is included within the range.


Any direction referred to herein, such as “top,” “bottom,” “left,” “right,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” below,” and other directions and orientations are described herein for clarity in reference to the figures and are not to be limiting of an actual device or system or use of the device or system. Many of the devices, articles or systems described herein may be used in a number of directions and orientations. Directional descriptors used herein with regard to cell culture apparatuses often refer to directions when the apparatus is oriented for purposes of culturing cells in the apparatus.


Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that any particular order be inferred. Any recited single or multiple feature or aspect in any one claim can be combined or permuted with any other recited feature or aspect in any other claim or claims.


It is also noted that recitations herein refer to a component being “configured” or “adapted to” function in a particular way. In this respect, such a component is “configured” or “adapted to” embody a particular property, or function in a particular manner, where such recitations are structural recitations as opposed to recitations of intended use. More specifically, the references herein to the manner in which a component is “configured” or “adapted to” denotes an existing physical condition of the component and, as such, is to be taken as a definite recitation of the structural characteristics of the component.


While various features, elements or steps of particular embodiments may be disclosed using the transitional phrase “comprising,” it is to be understood that alternative embodiments, including those that may be described using the transitional phrases “consisting” or “consisting essentially of,” are implied. Thus, for example, implied alternative embodiments to a cell culture apparatus comprising a structured bottom surface, one or more sidewalls, a top and a port include embodiments where a cell culture apparatus consists of a structured bottom surface, one or more sidewalls, a top and a port and embodiments where a cell culture apparatus consists essentially of a structured bottom surface, one or more sidewalls, a top and a port.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present inventive technology without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Since modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and variations of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the inventive technology may occur to persons skilled in the art, the inventive technology should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A cell culture apparatus comprising: a substrate defining a well, wherein the well comprises an interior surface having a hemispheric shape, an exterior surface having an aspheric a convex shape, an upper aperture and a nadir;wherein light passes between the interior surface and the exterior surface;wherein the substrate defines a thickness between the interior surface and the exterior surface;wherein the thickness increases continuously from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir; andwherein a majority of the well is fully illuminated when exposed to illumination with a brightfield microscope.
  • 2. The cell culture apparatus of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the substrate proximate to the nadir is greater than the thickness of the substrate proximate to the upper aperture.
  • 3. The cell culture apparatus of claim 1, wherein the well defines an axis between the nadir and a center of the upper aperture, wherein the well is rotationally symmetrical about the axis.
  • 4. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the upper aperture defines a distance across the upper aperture, wherein the distance across the upper aperture is in a range from 100 micrometers to 3000 micrometers.
  • 5. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the thickness of the substrate at any location from proximate the upper aperture to the nadir is in a range from 10 micrometers to 1000 micrometers.
  • 6. The cell culture apparatus of claim 1, wherein the hemispherical shape of the interior surface defines a radius in a range from 50 micrometers to 1500 micrometers.
  • 7. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises polystyrene.
  • 8. The cell culture apparatus according claim 1, wherein the light entering the interior surface is substantially parallel to the light leaving the surface when the well contains a cell culture medium.
  • 9. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a shape of the interior surface and a shape of the exterior surface are configured to minimize refraction of light that passes there between when the well contains a cell culture medium.
  • 10. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the well is non-adherent to cells.
  • 11. The cell culture apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the interior surface is configured such that cells cultured therein form a spheroid.
  • 12. Use of the apparatus of claim 1 for the growth of a spheroid.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/499,370 filed on Apr. 27, 2017, which is a continuation of International Application Ser. No. PCT/US15/58123, filed on Oct. 29, 2015, which claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/072,019 filed on Oct. 29, 2014 the contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (206)
Number Name Date Kind
2947116 Wilton et al. Aug 1960 A
3630849 David et al. Dec 1971 A
4382685 Pearson May 1983 A
4498785 De Bruyne Feb 1985 A
4534656 De Bruyne Aug 1985 A
4670396 Bear et al. Jun 1987 A
4760028 De Bruyne et al. Jul 1988 A
4927764 Lyman et al. May 1990 A
4980293 Jeffs Dec 1990 A
5047347 Cline Sep 1991 A
5151366 Serkes et al. Sep 1992 A
5171994 Bahraman Dec 1992 A
5171995 Gast et al. Dec 1992 A
5240854 Berry et al. Aug 1993 A
5272084 O'Connell et al. Dec 1993 A
5319436 Manns et al. Jun 1994 A
5374557 Verma Dec 1994 A
5398837 Degrassi Mar 1995 A
5487872 Hafeman et al. Jan 1996 A
5554536 Rising Sep 1996 A
5598262 Jutard et al. Jan 1997 A
5665562 Cook Sep 1997 A
5693537 Wilson et al. Dec 1997 A
5707869 Wolf et al. Jan 1998 A
5710043 Pay Jan 1998 A
5736397 Garcia et al. Apr 1998 A
5759494 Szlosek Jun 1998 A
5766949 Liau et al. Jun 1998 A
5772905 Chou Jun 1998 A
5783440 Stevens Jul 1998 A
5792653 Weibezahn et al. Aug 1998 A
5858309 Mathus et al. Jan 1999 A
5972694 Mathus Oct 1999 A
6030829 Dannoux et al. Feb 2000 A
6039972 Barlow et al. Mar 2000 A
6306646 Saad et al. Oct 2001 B1
6348999 Summersgill et al. Feb 2002 B1
6514464 Knebel Feb 2003 B1
6521451 Potter Feb 2003 B2
6567675 Rosen et al. May 2003 B1
6767607 Tanner et al. Jul 2004 B2
6811752 Barbera-Guillem Nov 2004 B2
6908767 Bader Jun 2005 B2
7470424 Kataoka et al. Dec 2008 B2
7547547 Dang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7674346 Clements et al. Mar 2010 B2
7687262 Cattadoris Mar 2010 B2
7691369 Kataoka et al. Apr 2010 B2
7727759 Ozawa et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745209 Martin et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745210 Martin Jun 2010 B2
7897379 Kenney et al. Mar 2011 B2
7919319 Jervis et al. Apr 2011 B2
8053230 Whittlinger Nov 2011 B2
8143053 Yerbic Mar 2012 B2
8148152 Kolossov et al. Apr 2012 B2
8158426 Wilson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8158427 Wilson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163537 Martin et al. Apr 2012 B2
8168432 Wilson et al. May 2012 B2
8178345 Bennett et al. May 2012 B2
8273572 Martin et al. Sep 2012 B2
8318479 Domansky et al. Nov 2012 B2
8415144 Wilson et al. Apr 2013 B2
8470589 Martin et al. Jun 2013 B2
D685497 Kenney et al. Jul 2013 S
8486692 Simon Jul 2013 B2
8597597 Deutsch et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617879 Yu et al. Dec 2013 B2
8697443 Wilson et al. Apr 2014 B2
8759017 Owen et al. Jun 2014 B2
8778669 Lacey et al. Jul 2014 B2
8846399 Martin et al. Sep 2014 B2
8906685 Takayama et al. Dec 2014 B2
8932544 Mueller et al. Jan 2015 B2
9039883 Guerrieri et al. May 2015 B2
9040293 Gulzow et al. May 2015 B2
9045721 Martin et al. Jun 2015 B2
9068281 Wu et al. Jun 2015 B2
9126199 Moritz et al. Sep 2015 B2
9169460 Cecchi Oct 2015 B2
D748812 Kenney et al. Feb 2016 S
9260684 Egeler et al. Feb 2016 B1
9260695 Crowley et al. Feb 2016 B2
9493733 Giles Nov 2016 B2
9494577 McGarr et al. Nov 2016 B2
9573128 McClelland Feb 2017 B1
9587213 Morgan et al. Mar 2017 B2
9636680 Fattinger et al. May 2017 B2
9732317 Wilson Aug 2017 B2
9790465 Bennett et al. Oct 2017 B2
9845451 Martin et al. Dec 2017 B2
9862918 Ito Jan 2018 B2
10254274 Miklas et al. Apr 2019 B2
11441121 Bennett et al. Sep 2022 B2
11613722 Martin et al. Mar 2023 B2
20020022219 Clements et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020172621 Barbera-Guillem Nov 2002 A1
20030031829 Tanner et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030104494 Ravkin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030183958 Goff et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030186217 Bader Oct 2003 A1
20030215941 Campbell et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040091397 Picard May 2004 A1
20040101955 Whitley May 2004 A1
20040125266 Miyauchi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040216835 Tanner et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040259242 Malinge et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259423 Elbaz et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050032208 Oh et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050047971 Clements et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050052646 Wohlstadter Mar 2005 A1
20050074873 Shanler et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050112030 Gaus May 2005 A1
20050116717 Dransfield et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147959 Frondoza et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060110822 Robbins et al. May 2006 A1
20060234370 Korpinen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060252044 Okumura et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060292654 Reardon Dec 2006 A1
20070178441 Li Aug 2007 A1
20070216897 Sonda Sep 2007 A1
20080003671 Martin Jan 2008 A1
20080009027 Fraker et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080118974 Martin et al. May 2008 A1
20080206857 Kenney et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080268515 Cullimore et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080297784 Leblanc et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080299649 Martin et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080300278 Torrens et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017540 Nishio et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018033 Morgan et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029462 Beardsley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037293 Unger et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090170190 Nishi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090191620 Martin et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090288963 Guerrieri et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090298164 Cattadoris et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090298166 Fang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100055774 Wilson Mar 2010 A1
20100068793 Ungrin et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100093075 Mueller Apr 2010 A1
20100112014 Gilbert et al. May 2010 A1
20100112684 Lee et al. May 2010 A1
20100119418 Clements et al. May 2010 A1
20100170790 Takahashi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100190197 Martin et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100197013 Kamp et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100247386 Deutsch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100273258 Lannutti et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100297600 Cecchi Nov 2010 A1
20110086375 Ungrin et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110097790 Yerbic Apr 2011 A1
20110129923 Wilson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110229961 Higashi et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120064627 Khine et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120129208 Khine et al. May 2012 A1
20120129257 Yu et al. May 2012 A1
20120219572 Prockop et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130052331 Kram et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130122539 Li et al. May 2013 A1
20130122580 Tsukada et al. May 2013 A1
20130143254 Thomas et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130164848 Munaka et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130203159 Itoh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130344598 Nistor Dec 2013 A1
20140004086 Peak Jan 2014 A1
20140027784 Wada et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140099717 Fraker et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140106394 Ko et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140106452 Vukasinovic Apr 2014 A1
20140120573 Tavana et al. May 2014 A1
20140178992 Nakashima et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140221225 Danen et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140226004 Son et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140227784 Ejiri et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140315296 Wilson Oct 2014 A1
20140322806 Bennett et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150004686 Goral et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150064738 Tsukada et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150072405 Ito Mar 2015 A1
20150184119 Tsukada et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150247112 Orr et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160003796 Kranbuehl Jan 2016 A1
20160017267 Hansen et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160040120 Gottwald et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160137962 Ejiri et al. May 2016 A1
20160194588 Guenat et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160216250 Ritter et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160250631 Kang et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170067019 Ho Mar 2017 A1
20170073625 Kasuto et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170226455 Fang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170267959 Martin et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170283757 Carter et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170306281 Martin et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170342363 Fang et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180166743 Lee et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180201888 Miwa et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180301754 Badding et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190006707 Sakamoto et al. Jan 2019 A1
20200131461 Martin et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200199006 Jain et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200239854 Ayano et al. Jul 2020 A1
20210062126 Martin et al. Mar 2021 A1
20220220434 Martin et al. Jul 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (167)
Number Date Country
2004256209 Jan 2005 AU
2558946 Jan 2005 CA
2679011 Sep 2008 CA
2848875 Mar 2013 CA
2186755 Jan 1995 CN
1168921 Dec 1997 CN
1234112 Nov 1999 CN
1867663 Nov 2006 CN
1875093 Dec 2006 CN
201626959 Nov 2010 CN
101978041 Feb 2011 CN
102105578 Jun 2011 CN
102257123 Nov 2011 CN
102449135 May 2012 CN
102687023 Sep 2012 CN
202450098 Sep 2012 CN
202849407 Apr 2013 CN
103080294 May 2013 CN
103119151 May 2013 CN
203513696 Apr 2014 CN
103814125 May 2014 CN
204608026 Sep 2015 CN
204702760 Oct 2015 CN
204714819 Oct 2015 CN
204752742 Nov 2015 CN
204803327 Nov 2015 CN
205170866 Apr 2016 CN
205669029 Nov 2016 CN
205839030 Dec 2016 CN
205990396 Mar 2017 CN
107208025 Sep 2017 CN
107460125 Dec 2017 CN
8309876 Dec 1983 DE
10019862 Nov 2001 DE
202006017853 Jan 2007 DE
102009005526 Jul 2010 DE
102014214077 Jan 2016 DE
102014017728 Jun 2016 DE
0307048 Mar 1989 EP
0605527 Jul 1994 EP
0681846 Nov 1995 EP
0800571 Oct 1997 EP
0834552 Apr 1998 EP
0965633 Dec 1999 EP
1181349 Feb 2002 EP
1348533 Oct 2003 EP
1445022 Aug 2004 EP
1988152 Nov 2008 EP
2032262 Mar 2009 EP
2617807 Jul 2013 EP
2653531 Oct 2013 EP
2759592 Jul 2014 EP
2896684 Jul 2015 EP
3081627 Oct 2016 EP
3296018 Mar 2018 EP
3351615 Jul 2018 EP
3372666 Sep 2018 EP
2147100 May 1985 GB
03-139350 Jun 1991 JP
06-038734 Feb 1994 JP
06-327462 Nov 1994 JP
09-173049 Jul 1997 JP
09-234811 Sep 1997 JP
10-210866 Aug 1998 JP
10-210966 Aug 1998 JP
2001-106749 Apr 2001 JP
2003-135056 May 2003 JP
2003-180335 Jul 2003 JP
2004-129558 Apr 2004 JP
2004-535829 Dec 2004 JP
2005-080660 Mar 2005 JP
2006-121991 May 2006 JP
2006-191809 Jul 2006 JP
2007-510429 Apr 2007 JP
3139350 Feb 2008 JP
2009-017810 Jan 2009 JP
2009-050194 Mar 2009 JP
2009-183288 Aug 2009 JP
2009-542230 Dec 2009 JP
2010-088347 Apr 2010 JP
2010-104327 May 2010 JP
2010-518879 Jun 2010 JP
2010-158214 Jul 2010 JP
2011-509686 Mar 2011 JP
2011-521642 Jul 2011 JP
2011-172533 Sep 2011 JP
2011-528226 Nov 2011 JP
2012-249547 Dec 2012 JP
2013-055911 Mar 2013 JP
2014-132869 Jul 2014 JP
2015-012827 Jan 2015 JP
2015-029431 Feb 2015 JP
2015-073520 Apr 2015 JP
2016-002023 Jan 2016 JP
5845185 Jan 2016 JP
2016-093149 May 2016 JP
2016-136920 Aug 2016 JP
2016-136921 Aug 2016 JP
2017-532970 Nov 2017 JP
2018-108032 Jul 2018 JP
10-2014-0113139 Sep 2014 KR
10-2014-0125662 Oct 2014 KR
10-2017-0008539 Jan 2017 KR
9207063 Apr 1992 WO
9307258 Apr 1993 WO
9621851 Jul 1996 WO
9815355 Apr 1998 WO
9831466 Jul 1998 WO
0180997 Nov 2001 WO
0192462 Dec 2001 WO
2004044120 May 2004 WO
2004094060 Nov 2004 WO
2005047464 May 2005 WO
2006043267 Apr 2006 WO
2007015770 Feb 2007 WO
2007097120 Aug 2007 WO
2008006104 Jan 2008 WO
2008008149 Jan 2008 WO
2008106771 Sep 2008 WO
2008118500 Oct 2008 WO
2008140295 Nov 2008 WO
2008149039 Dec 2008 WO
2008153783 Dec 2008 WO
2009094125 Jul 2009 WO
2009148509 Dec 2009 WO
2009148512 Dec 2009 WO
2010008566 Jan 2010 WO
2010042072 Apr 2010 WO
2010069589 Jun 2010 WO
2012036011 Mar 2012 WO
2012077683 Jun 2012 WO
2012170232 Dec 2012 WO
2013042360 Mar 2013 WO
2013108293 Jul 2013 WO
2013116449 Aug 2013 WO
2014042162 Mar 2014 WO
2014072432 May 2014 WO
2014140181 Sep 2014 WO
2014156455 Oct 2014 WO
2014165273 Oct 2014 WO
2014171782 Oct 2014 WO
2014179196 Nov 2014 WO
2014196204 Dec 2014 WO
2015033507 Mar 2015 WO
2015061907 May 2015 WO
2015087369 Jun 2015 WO
2016020992 Feb 2016 WO
2016064757 Apr 2016 WO
2016069885 May 2016 WO
2016069892 May 2016 WO
2016069895 May 2016 WO
2016069917 May 2016 WO
2016069930 May 2016 WO
2016157322 Oct 2016 WO
2017025584 Feb 2017 WO
2017047735 Mar 2017 WO
2017077163 May 2017 WO
WO 2017077163 May 2017 WO
2017142410 Aug 2017 WO
2018068034 Apr 2018 WO
2018200893 Nov 2018 WO
2019010401 Jan 2019 WO
2019014621 Jan 2019 WO
2019014627 Jan 2019 WO
2019014635 Jan 2019 WO
2019014636 Jan 2019 WO
2019178039 Sep 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (136)
Entry
“Identification grid for microplates”, Rtreived from: https://www.kisker-biotech.com/frontoffice/product?produitId=0N-27-11, 2 pages, 2021.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2015/058053; Mailed May 11, 2017; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US14/35635; Mailed Nov. 12, 2015; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58032; Mailed May 11, 2017; 7 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58048; Mailed May 11, 2017; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58106; Mailed May 11, 2017; 8 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2015/058123; Mailed May 11, 2017; 8 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042115; Mailed Jan. 23, 2020; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042133; Mailed Jan. 23, 2020; 8 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042145; Mailed Jan. 23, 2020; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042159; Mailed Jan. 23, 2020; 8 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042161; Mailed Jan. 23, 2020; 9 Pages.
International Search Report and Written of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042145; Mailed Oct. 26, 2018; 12 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042159; Mailed Oct. 22, 2018; 10 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2021/044259; dated Nov. 8, 2021; 10 pages; Korean Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US14/35635; Mailed Aug. 22, 2014; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58032; Mailed Jan. 27, 2016; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58048; Mailed Feb. 11, 2016; 11 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US15/58106; Mailed Jan. 21, 2016; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2015/058053; Mailed Jan. 20, 2016; 11 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2015/058123; Mailed Jan. 19, 2016; 9 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/041974; Mailed Mar. 14, 2019; 10 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/041985; Mailed Mar. 19, 2019; 11 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042004; Mailed Apr. 4, 2019; 10 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042115; Mailed Oct. 16, 2018; 12 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042133; Mailed Oct. 24, 2018; 11 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2018/042161; Mailed Dec. 12, 2018; 12 Pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2020/034120; mailed on Aug. 5, 2020, 15 pages; European Patent Office.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2021/059622; mailed on May 23, 2022, 11 pages; European Patent Office.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-511776, Office Action Dated Feb. 15, 2018, 6 Pages; Japanese Patent Office.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-511776, Office Action Dated Jan. 17, 2019, 6 Pages; Japanese Patent Office.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-523816 Decision of Refusal dated Sep. 16, 2020; 11 Pages; Japanese Patent Office.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-215684 Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2021, 8 pages (4 pages of English Translation and 4 pages of Original Document); Japanese Patent Office.
Jeon et al, “Combined Effects of Flow-Induced Shear Stress and Micropatterned Surface Morphology on Neuronal Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells” J Biosci Bioeng, 2014, 117(2):242-247.
Jiang et al, “Shear Enhances Thrombopoiesis and Formation of Microparticles That Induce Megakaryocytic Differentiation of Stem Cells”, Blood, Sep. 25, 2014; 124(13):2094-2103.
Junji Fukuda et al., “Hepatocyte Spheroid Arrays Inside Microwells Connected With Microchannels”, Biomicrofluidics 5, 2011, pp. 10.
Kelm et al, “Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2003; 83(2):173-180.
Kim et al, “Shear Stress Induced by an Interstitial Level of Slow Flow Increases the Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Through TAZ Activation” PloS ONE, Mar. 21, 2014; 9(3), e92427, 9 pages.
Koide et al., “Formation of multicellular spheroids composed of adult rat hepatocytes in dishes with positively charged surfaces and under other nonadherent environments”, Exp Cell Res 1990; 186:227-235.
Kutsuzawa et al, “Highly Robust Protein Production by Co-Culture of CHO Spheroids Layered on Feeder Cells in Serum-Free Medium”; Colloid Polym Sci (2014) 292; 839-848.
Labusca, “Scaffold free 3D culture of mesenchymal stem cells; implications for regenerative medicine”, J Transplant Stem Cel Biol 2015 2(1): 8.
Landry et al., “Spheroidal aggregate culture of rat liver cells: histotypic reorganization, biomatrix deposition, and maintenance of functional activities” J Cell Biol 1985; 101:914-923.
Lin et al., “La2Zr2O7 and MgO co-doped composite Li-Garnet solid electrolyte”, Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 40, 2020, pp. 132-136.
Liquid Surge Control, LLC; “The Latest in Drop-In Baffle Technology”; 2 Pages; (2019).
Lonza Inc., “SeaPrep Agarose: An Ultralow Gelling, Soft Agarose”, Available Online at <http://www.lonzabio.jp/catalog/pdf/pd/PD031.pdf>, 2007, pp. 1-4.
Lovett et al. “Vascularization Strategies for Tissue Engineering” Tissue Engineering Part B, 2009, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 353-370.
Lquid Surge Control, LLC; “The Latest in Drop-In Baffle Technology”; 2 Pages; (2019).
Martin et al., “Agarose and Methylcellulose Hydrogel Blends for Nerve Regeneration Applications”, J. Neural Eng., vol. 5, 2008, pp. 221-231.
McMillan, “Shear stress in microfluidic devices” Darwin Microfludics interner article (Year: 2017).
Messner et al, Multi-cell type human liver microtissues for hepatotoxicity testing. Archives of Toxicology, Nov. 11, 2012, 5 pages.
Mimetas The Organ-on-a-Chip Company; “Organ-on-a-Chip Models for Science and Pharma”; 4 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://mimetas.com/.
Curcio et al. “Mass transfer and metabolic reactions in hepatocyte spheroids cultured in rotating wall gas-permeable membrane system.” Biomaterials 28 (2007) 5487-5497. (Year: 2007).
Evenou et al. “Spontaneous Formation of Highly Functional Three-Dimensional Multilayer from Human Hepatoma Hep G2 Cells Cultured on an Oxygen-Permeable Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane.” Tissue Engineering: Part C vol. 16, No. 2, 2010, pp. 311-318. (Year: 2010).
Koike et al. “Characterization of Embryo id Bodies of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Formed under Various Culture Conditions and Estimation of Differentiation Status of Such Bodies.” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering vol. I 04, No. 4, 294-299. 2007. (Year: 2007).
Nortis; “Bridging the Gap Between In Vitro and In Vivo Research”; 16 Pages; (2015); https://www.nortisbio.com/.
Office Action and Search Report for CN 201580071454.0 mailed Sep. 27, 2019; 8 pages; Chinese Patent Office.
Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2019 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 15/708,473, filed Sep. 19, 2017, 20 pgs.
Organovo, “Pioneering Bioprinted Tissues to Treat Disease”; 2 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020) http://organovo.com/.
Otsuka et al., “Two-dimensional multiarray formation of hepatocyte spheroids on a microfabricated PEG-brush surface.” ChemBioChem 2004; 5:850-855.
Polyimide: Japan Polyimide and Aromatic Polymers Study Group, 2010, pp. 364-371 Table 2.
Rezende et al, “Scalable Biofabrication of Tissue Spheroids for Organ Printing”; Sciverse Science Direct, Procedia Cirp 5, (2013) 276-281.
Sakai et al, “Detachably Assembled Microfluidic Device for Perfusion Culture and Post-Culture Analysis of Spheroid Array”; Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9, 971-979.
Sakai et al, “Large-scale preparation and function of porcine hepatocyte spheroids.” Int J Artif Organs 1996; vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 294-301.
Sakai et al, “Technique for the Control of Spheroid Diameter Using Microfabricated Chips”; ScienceDirect, Acta Biomaterialia 3 (2007) 1033-1040.
Sakai et al; “Technique for the Control of Spheroid Diameter Using Microfabricated Chips”; Sciencedirect, Acta Biomaterials 3 (2007) 1033-1040.
Satoh et al, “A Pneumatic Pressure-Driven Multi-Throughput Microfluidic Circulation Culture System” Lab Chip, 2016, 16, 2339-2348.
Second Office Action and Search Report for CN 201580071454.0 mailed Aug. 31, 2020; 8 pages.
Singapore Patent Application No. 11201703494P Examination Report dated Sep. 25, 2020; 5 Pages; Singapore Patent Office.
Singapore Patent Application No. 11201703500X, Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2021; 8 pages; Singapore Patent Office.
Singaporean Patent Application No. 11201703498W, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 27, 2021, 4 pages (Original Document Only), Singaporean Patent Office.
Stemcell Technologies, Reproducible and Uniform Embryoid Bodies Using AggreWell Plates, StemCell Technologies, Version 3.0.0, Mar. 2011, Catalog #29146, pp. 1-28.
Tara; “Innovating Predictive Cardiac Physiology”; 4 Pages; (2019) http://tarabiosystems.com/.
The Lab Depot(Registered) Products for Discovery Lab Supplies; Shake Flasks, 3 and 4 Baffles Product Information; 5 Pages (2019).
Tissue Dynamics, “Disruptive Drug Development”; 3 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://www.tissuedynamics.com/.
Tissuse; Technology, Available on (https://www.tissuse.com/en/technology/), Accessed May 11, 2021, 4 pages.
Tobe et al, “Receptor-mediated formation of multilayer aggregates of primary cultured adult rat hepatocytes on tactose-subsliluled polystyrene” Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 184(1):225-230.
Tong et al, “Long-term culture of adult rat hepatocyte spheroids.” Exp Cell Res 1992; 200:326-332.
Tung et al, “High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using 384 hanging drop array” Analyst, 2011, 136 (3), 473-478.
Weegman et al, “Nutrient Regulation by Continuous Feeding Removes Limitations on Cell Yield in the Large-Scale Expansion of Mammalian Cell Spheroids”; PLoS ONE, 2013, vol. 8, Issue 10, e76611, 10 Pages.
Wikipedia, “Antiroll Tanks”; 3 Pages; Page Last Edited May 23, 2019.
WO-2008149039 translation (Year: 2008).
Wrighton et al, “Forces of Change: Mechanics Underlying Formation of Functional 3D Organ Buds” Cell Stem Cell, May 7, 2015; 16(5): 453-454.
Xu et al, “Characterisation of some cytotoxic endpoints using rat liver and HepG2 spheroids as in vitro models and their application in hepatotoxicity studies. I. Glucose metabolism and enzyme release as cytotoxic markers.” Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2003; 189:100-111.
Yamada et al, “Efficient induction of hepatocyte spheroids in a suspension culture using a water-soluble synthetic polymer as an artificial matrix.” J Biochem 1998; 123:1017-1023.
Yang et al.,“An Agarose-Gel Based Method for Transporting Cell Lines”, Current Chemical Genomics, vol. 3, Jan. 2009, pp. 50-53.
Zuidema et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of Tunable Polysaccharide Hydrogel Blends for Neural Repair”, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, No. 4, Apr. 2011, pp. 1634-1643.
“Laboratory Flasks Selection Guide: Types, Features, Applications”, Engineering360, <https://www.globalspec.com/learnmore/labware_scientific_instruments/labware_consumables/laboratory_flasks#:˜:text=Laboratory%20flasks%20are%20lab%20vessels, the%20opening%20at%20the%20neck.> accessed Apr. 8, 2022 (Year: 2022).
Achilli et al., “Advances in the Formation, Use and Understanding of Multi-cellular Spheroids”, Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 12, No. 10, Jul. 2012, pp. 1347-1360.
Alepee et al, “State-of-the-Art 3D Cultures (Organs-on-a-Chip) in Safety Testing and Pathophysiology”; Transatlantic Think Tank for Toxicology, T4 Workshop Report, Altex 31, 4/14, pp. 441-477, Retrieved From: http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex1406111 (Jul. 14, 2014).
Aline, “We Engineer Microfluidic Products” ; 7 Pages; (2020) https://alineinc.com/.
AxoSIM, Nerve-on-a-Chip Mini-Brain About Team; 6 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); http://axosim.com/.
BioIVT Elevating SCIENCE(Registered); 6 Pages; (2020); http://www.hepregen.com/.
Brandrup et al., “Polymer Handbook”, Fourth Edition, Wiley-Interscience Publication, , Permeability and diffusion data, 1999, 9 pages (Contributors; Preface).
Cheng et al, “MicroRNA-34a Targets Forkhead Box J2 to Modulate Differentiation of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Response to Shear Stress”, J Mol Cell Cardiol. 74 (2014) 4-12.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580071454.0 First Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019, 23 pages Chinese Patent Office.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580071454.0 Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020; 8 Pages; Chinese Patent Office.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580071507.9 Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2020; 20 Pages; Chinese Patent Office.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580071507.9, Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2021, 8 pages (English Translation Only), Chinese Patent Office.
Chinese Patent Application No. 201580071527.6 Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020; 19 Pages; Chinese Patent Office.
CN-Bio, “Transforming Drug Discovery and the Lives of Patients”; 5 Pages; (2020) http:/cn-bio.com/.
Colazzo et al, “Shear Stress and VEGF Enhance Endothelial Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells”, Growth Factors, 2014, 32(5):139-149.
Corning Life Sciences Product Portfolio; 5 Pages Saved Mar. 6, 2020.
Corning(Registered) HTS Transwell(Registered)—96 Tissue Culture Systems, Permeable Supports for High Throughput Screening Applications; 2 Pages (2004).
Document entitled Description EP2653531A1, machine translation of EP 2653531 A1 provided by Proquest, original document published 2013 (Year: 2013).
Domansky et al, “Perfused Multiwell Plate for 30 Liver Tissue Engineering”, Lab Chip, 2010, 10:51-58.
ELVEFLOW; “Microfluidics Innovation Center”; 6 Pages; (Downloaded Mar. 9, 2020); https://www.elveflow.com.
Emulate, 6 Pages; (2019) https://emulatebio.com/.
Endo et al., “Gene transfection to spheroid culture system on micropattemed culture plate by polyplex nanomicelle: a novel platform of genetically-modified cell transplantation”, Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res., 2012, vol. 2, p. 398-405.
Engelberg et al, “Essential operating principles for tumor spheroid growth”, BMC Systems Biology 2008, 2:110, 19 pages.
European Patent Application No. 15794415.8 Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018; 4 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749241.8 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 23, 2020; 3 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 14727673.7 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Mailed Mar. 25, 2019; 6 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 14727673.7 Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Jul. 24, 2019; 6 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 14727673.7 Decision to grant a European patent; dated Dec. 12, 2019; 2 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 14727673.7; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Aug. 6, 2018; 5 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 15791186.8 Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2018; 4 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 15791189.2 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 29, 2018; 3 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 15791194.2 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 22, 2018; 3 Pages: European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 15793987.7 Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018; 4 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749240.0 Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Mar. 11, 2021; 6 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749241.8 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 8, 2020; 3 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749241.8 Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2021; 5 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749265.7 Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2020; 4 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749948 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 16, 2020; 5 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749949.6 Communication from the Examining Division dated Jun. 1, 2021; 2 Pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749949.6 Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2020; 4 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749952.0 Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2020; 4 pages; European Patent Office.
European Patent Application No. 18749953 Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 17, 2020; 4 Pages; European Patent Office.
Extended Partial European Search Report and Search Opinion; 19211588.9; Mailed Mar. 10, 2020; 11 pages; European Patent Office.
Fukuda et al, “Efficacy of a polyurethane foam/spheroid artificial liver by using human hepaloblastoma cell line (Hep G2)”, Cell Transplantation, 2003, 12:51-58.
G-Plate: Accelerate your cell cultures to the next dimension, “An original cell culture model allowing for inland shaped 3D cell aggregates” 1 page, retrieved Sep. 8, 2015.
GeoCHEM Incorporated, Product Line; hllps://www.geocheminc.com, 4 Pages; (2020).
HμREL (Registered) Corporation, Bioanalytic Tools Company; 2 Pages; (2013); http://hurelcorp.com/.
Haycock, “3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques”, Methods Mol Biol, 2011; 695:1-15.
Hsiao et al., “Effects of 3D Microwell Culture on Initial Fate Specification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells”, Published in final edited form as AlChE J. vol. 60 No. 4, Apr. 2014, pp. 1225-1235.
Huang et al., “Preparation of dense Ta-LLZO/MgO composite Li-ion solid electrolyte: Sintering, microstructure, performance and the role of MgO”, Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 39, 2019, pp. 8-16.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220081661 A1 Mar 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62072019 Oct 2014 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15499370 Apr 2017 US
Child 17532196 US
Parent PCT/US2015/058123 Oct 2015 WO
Child 15499370 US