a is a plot of the output power vs. the pump power with the epitaxial layer mounted up and down for a laser containing the mode-blocking layer.
b is a plot of the output power vs. the pump power with the epitaxial layer mounted up and down for a laser without the mode-blocking layer.
The vast majority of semiconductor lasers are diode lasers that rely on passing an electrical current through the layered semiconductor structure to create the electrons and holes that are needed for laser action. In order to accomplish this, diodes must include layers, which are doped either positive or negative. These doped cladding layers are low index materials that act as a waveguide to confine the laser's optical mode from spreading much beyond the active region and they are very good absorbers of the laser light. These characteristics keep the optical mode from touching the epitaxial bonding surface.
In contrast, the optically pumped semiconductor laser (OPSEL) is fundamentally different in that it does not require the presence of doped layers for operation. Furthermore, the substrate materials must be transparent to the pump laser wavelengths. This leads to a simplified layered structure in which the active layer has very weak index guiding. The broadened waveguide allows for the formation of a very wide optical mode whose transverse dimension extends far beyond the active and waveguide region. Since this wide mode can reach the physical limit of the semiconductor structure, it can touch the bonding metallization and incur significant optical loss and reduced power output. It is this problem, unique to the structure of an OPSEL, with a broadened waveguide design that is addressed herein.
High powered, optically pumped semiconductor lasers operating in the mid-IR range (2-10 microns) generate a large amount of heat that must be dissipated.
Two methods have been used in the past to isolate the laser's optical mode from the bonding material or metal in optically pumped mid-IR lasers. The first uses a combination of bonding metals with the correct refractive properties such that if the laser's optical mode touches these metals, no increase in loss will occur. The drawback of this method is that the correct metallization must be determined and used or the waveguide loss will increase and the laser power will be decreased. The second method is to mount the laser epitaxial side up and pressure bond a diamond block/heat sink on the epitaxial side. The disadvantages of this method are that the optical pump beam is reflected at the diamond surface and the contact quality must be very good. Additional mounting hardware is also necessary to achieve the final heat-sinked semiconductor package. Epitaxial up mounting also cannot be used when the laser is run under thermally stressing conditions such as high duty cycle or quasi-CW operation
in which we assumed the front and back facet reflectivities, r, are 0.34 while the device length, l, is 2.5 mm. The plot shows that the outcoupling efficiency improves from 0.67 to 0.9 as the waveguide mode isolation layer thickness is increased to 0.2 μm.
To experimentally test the effectiveness of the waveguide mode isolation layer two similar devices were grown and compared. The structure of device A is shown in
The ratio of the maximum powers as a function of heat sink temperature, R(T), is defined as:
where PmaxA is the maximum output power for device A and PmaxB is the maximum output power of device B. Both powers were measured on devices that were mounted epitaxial side down. The graph in
The conditions under which this invention was made are such as to entitle the Government of the United States under paragraph I(a) of Executive Order 10096, as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force, to the entire right, title and interest therein, including foreign rights.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5625635 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6327293 | Salokatve et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6448642 | Bewley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6734043 | Meyer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735234 | Paschotta et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6813296 | Goyal et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20020182779 | Bewley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043877 | Kaspi | Mar 2003 | A1 |