Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is data processing, or, more specifically, methods, apparatus, and computer program products for migrating a single root input/output virtualization (SR-IOV) adapter configuration in a computing environment.
Description of Related Art
The development of the EDVAC computer system of 1948 is often cited as the beginning of the computer era. Since that time, computer systems have evolved into extremely complicated devices. Today's computers are much more sophisticated than early systems such as the EDVAC. Computer systems typically include a combination of hardware and software components, application programs, operating systems, processors, buses, memory, input/output devices, and so on. As advances in semiconductor processing and computer architecture push the performance of the computer higher and higher, more sophisticated computer software has evolved to take advantage of the higher performance of the hardware, resulting in computer systems today that are much more powerful than just a few years ago.
One area of advancement includes data centers providing cloud services with various types of virtualization services. Regardless of the particular type of virtualization service being offered, most virtualization services make use of massive amounts of data I/O traffic and network bandwidth. In such a computing environment, an industry standard specification, SR-IOV, exists for creating virtual processes that allow for independent access to I/O hardware resources of a shared network device. However, problems still exist in reducing the impact from hardware failures or updates on the hardware being utilized by the virtualization services.
Disclosed are embodiments for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing system. One embodiment includes a computing system that includes a plurality of logical partitions, a hypervisor supporting the plurality of logical partitions, a plurality of SR-IOV adapters, where at least one of the logical partitions is mapped to a virtual function on a first SR-IOV adapter of the plurality of adapters, and where a method for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment includes: cloning, on a second SR-IOV adapter, a configuration of the first SR-IOV adapter; placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error state; remapping the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; and placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error recovery state.
The foregoing and other features, aspects, and details are described in the Detailed Description, and are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, where like reference numbers generally represent like parts of the disclosed embodiments.
Embodiments of methods, apparatus, and computer program products for migrating a single root input/output virtualization (SR-IOV) adapter configurations in a computing system are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with
The example data center (120) of
The computer system (102) includes at least one computer processor (156) or “CPU” as well as random access memory (168) or “RAM,” which is connected through a high speed memory bus (166) and bus adapter (158) to processor (156) and to other components of the computer system (102).
Stored in RAM (168) is a hypervisor (136) and a management console (138). The management console (138) may provide a user interface through which a user may direct the hypervisor (136) on instantiating and maintaining multiple logical partitions (182,184), where each logical partition may provide virtualization services to one or more clients. Although management console (138) is depicted in RAM (168) of the computer system (102), readers of skill in the art will recognize that such a management console may also be implemented in a different system entirely. As explained below in greater detail, the hypervisor and management console may be configured to migrate an SR-IOV adapter configuration according to various embodiments. The management console (138) for example may, when executed, cause the hypervisor (136) to carry out the steps of: cloning, on a second SR-IOV adapter, a configuration of a first SR-IOV adapter; placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error state; remapping the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; and placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error recovery state.
Also stored in RAM (168) is an operating system (154) for each of the logical partitions (182, 184). Operating systems useful in computers configured for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment according to various embodiments include UNIX, Linux, Microsoft XP™, AIX™, IBM's i™ operating system, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. The operating system (154), hypervisor (136), and management console (138) are shown in RAM (168), but many components of such software may typically be stored in non-volatile memory such as, for example, on a data storage (170) device or in firmware (132).
The computer system (102) may also include a storage device adapter (172) coupled through expansion bus (160) and bus adapter (158) to processor (156) and other components of the computer system (102). Storage device adapter (172) connects non-volatile data storage to the computer system (102) in the form of data storage (170). Storage device adapters useful in computers configured for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration according to various embodiments include Integrated Drive Electronics (“IDE”) adapters, Small Computer System Interface (“SCSI”) adapters, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Non-volatile computer memory also may be implemented for as an optical disk drive, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (so-called “EEPROM” or “Flash” memory), RAM drives, and so on, as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The example computer system (102) may also include one or more input/output (“I/O”) adapters (178). I/O adapters implement user-oriented input/output through, for example, software drivers and computer hardware for controlling output to display devices such as computer display screens, as well as user input from user input devices (181) such as keyboards and mice. The example computer system (104) may also include a video adapter (114), which may be an example of an I/O adapter specially designed for graphic output to a display device (180) such as a display screen or computer monitor. Video adapter (114) may be connected to processor (156) through a high speed video bus (164), bus adapter (158), and the front side bus (162), which may also be a high speed bus.
The example computer system (102) of
The network adapters (110-1-110-N) may further be configured for data communications with hosts (195) over a network (101) reachable through local area networks (LANs), such as LAN (100). The network adapters (110-1-110-N) may further be configured for data communications with storage area networks (SANs), such as SAN (112), and for data communications with various storage devices, such as storage devices (106) and storage devices (108).
From time to time and for various reasons, an adapter may be scheduled to be taken offline. SR-IOV adapters, such as the network adapters (110-1-110-N), when taken offline, may cause many disruptions due to the virtualized connection provide to logical partitions. To that end, the computer system (102) of
In an embodiment, the management console (138) may be implemented within the hypervisor (136), and the management console (138) may configure SR-IOV adapters and mappings between logical partitions and virtual functions executing on a respective SR-IOV adapter. Further, the management console (138) may, through a user interface, receive commands for: performing software or firmware updates to SR-IOV adapters, or other network hardware; adding, removing, or reconfiguring SR-IOV adapters; performing maintenance tasks; or, generally, any administrative commands with regard to the virtual processes and hardware devices of the data center (120). In an embodiment, the management console (138) may be implemented on a different computer system than the computer system implementing the hypervisor (136). The hypervisor (136) may provide the management console as an interface for configuring the hypervisor (136), including scheduling updates, configuring logical partitions, and other system administration functions. For example, the management console may provide a user interface for assigning, or mapping, virtual functions on a given network adapter to given logical partitions.
A network adapter, such as network adapter (110-1), may be implemented as a network card installed within a PCIe slot on a circuit board of the computer system (102). Further, a given network adapter may be due for maintenance, upgrades, or may fail. In such cases, the network adapter may be offline for some period of time, which is undesirable from a customer perspective.
The hypervisor (136), to reduce downtime for a network adapter, may migrate an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment from a first SR-IOV adapter to a second SR-IOV adapter, and migrating virtual functions running on the first SR-IOV adapter to run on the second SR-IOV adapter. The hypervisor may carry out such migration by: cloning, on a second SR-IOV adapter, a configuration of the first SR-IOV adapter; placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error state; remapping the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; and placing the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error recovery state.
In addition to reducing downtown, the migration of an SR-IOV adapter from a source to a target may also enable a change in functionality or capacity. A user, for example, may request that a particular virtual function on a source adapter be expanded or reduced in functionality or capacity. To that end, the target adapter may be instructed to instantiate a virtual function that is of the requested functionality or capacity. Then, when the logical partition is remapped from the source to the target adapter, the virtual function mapped to the logical partition will be of different functionality or capacity than the original virtual function of the source adapter mapped to the logical partition prior to the migration.
Further, the operations related to migrating from a first SR-IOV adapter to a second SR-IOV adapter may be performed concurrent with normal I/O operations performed on the logical partition mapped to the first SR-IOV adapter. In effect, from the perspective of a logical partition utilizing a VF of the first SR-IOV adapter (the adapter for which the configuration is migrated to a second SR-IOV adapter), the adapter instantiated for use by the logical partition will experience a short error period and then regain functionality. The logical partition is unaware that the adapter configuration has been cloned to a second adapter and the logical partitions' VF is now supported by a different adapter after the error period.
While in this disclosure, the embodiments are described in the context of the SR-IOV standard and PCIe, such descriptions are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. In general, the disclosed embodiments for migrating network adapter or network device configurations used by a virtual process using a particular hardware resource to the virtual process using a different hardware resource of a network adapter or device is possible using other virtualization standards, or no standard at all. In other words, in general, a hypervisor may suspending operation of an initial hardware device being used by a logical partition, and while the hardware device is suspended, the hypervisor may migrate functionality of the suspended hardware device to another hardware device and also remap interrupts and other parameters such that when the hypervisor ends the suspended state, the logical partition uses the functionality of the other hardware device instead of the initial hardware device where the processes of the logical partition need not be aware of any remapping or migration of functionality from the initial hardware device to the other hardware device.
The network adapters (110-1-110-N) are for purposes of illustration, not for limitation. Similarly, data centers according to various embodiments may include additional servers, routers, other devices, and peer-to-peer architectures, not shown in the figures, as will occur to those of skill in the art. Networks in such data processing systems may support many data communications protocols, including for example TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), IP (Internet Protocol), HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), WAP (Wireless Access Protocol), HDTP (Handheld Device Transport Protocol), and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Various embodiments may be implemented on a variety of hardware platforms in addition to those illustrated.
Turning to
The network adapter (110-1) may include a physical function, such as physical function (204-1), where the physical function (204-1) may be the primary function of the network adapter (110-1) and may advertise SR-IOV capabilities and configure the network adapter (110-1). The network adapter (110-1) may include a physical function (204-1) that is associated, or mapped, to a parent partition or an adjunct partition. An adjunct function within the hypervisor (136) may be a logical partition that is further configured to request configuration information from the network adapter (110-1), or to specify parameters or define configuration information for the network adapter (110-1). Such an adjunct partition is generally not utilized in user-space.
The network adapter (110-1) may also include several virtual functions, where a given virtual function may share one or more physical resources of the network adapter (110-1) in a virtualized environment.
In this embodiment, adjunct partition (202-1) is mapped to physical function (204-1), as depicted by mapping (220-1); logical partition (202-2) is mapped to virtual function (204-2), as depicted by mapping (220-2); logical partition (202-M) is mapped to virtual function (204-M), as depicted by mapping (220-M); adjunct partition (206-1) is mapped to physical function (208-1), as depicted by mapping (222-1); logical partition (206-2) is mapped to virtual function (208-2), as depicted by mapping (222-2); and logical partition (206-P) is mapped to virtual function (208-P), as depicted by mapping (222-P).
A mapping may include: information for identifying a PCIe slot for the network adapter for a virtual function; specifications of direct memory access (DMA) memory space; mappings for memory mapped input output (MMIO); among other configurations or settings that enable a given logical partition to communicate and use physical resources by interfacing with a given virtual function on a network adapter.
Turning to
One embodiment includes a computing system (102) that includes a plurality of logical partitions (202-1-202-M . . . 206-1-206-P), a hypervisor (136) supporting the plurality of logical partitions, a plurality of SR-IOV adapters (110-1-110-M), where at least one of the logical partitions is mapped to a virtual function on a first SR-IOV adapter of the plurality of adapters, and where a method for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment includes: cloning (302), on a second SR-IOV adapter, a configuration of the first SR-IOV adapter; placing (304) the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error state; remapping (306) the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; and placing (308) the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error recovery state.
Cloning (302), on a second SR-IOV adapter, a configuration of a first SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) copying configuration information specifying the first SR-IOV adapter onto the second SR-IOV adapter. For example, the hypervisor (136) may obtain configuration information for the first SR-IOV adapter from stored, non-volatile memory. In other cases, the hypervisor (136) may query, via an adjunct partition mapped to a physical function on the first SR-IOV adapter, configuration information for the first SR-IOV adapter. Given the configuration information from the first SR-IOV adapter, the hypervisor may define, via an adjunct partition mapped to a physical function on the second SR-IOV adapter, the configuration information for the second SR-IOV adapter.
These cloning operations may be performed while the first SR-IOV adapter is functioning and handling I/O operations from the logical partitions mapped to the virtual functions on the first SR-IOV adapter. Further, during this cloning process, any modifications received that are directed to the first SR-IOV adapter may also be applied to the second SR-IOV adapter. Subsequent to cloning, the second SR-IOV adapter may be ready for operation, and at this point, operation on the first SR-IOV adapter may be suspended so that the virtual function may be remapped to the second SR-IOV adapter. In this way, after the virtual function in remapped, when the logical partition and the virtual function resume from their suspended state, the logical partition may communicate with the virtual function operating on the second SR-IOV adapter.
In an embodiment, the hypervisor (136), or an adjunct partition created and associated with a physical function on the second SR-IOV adapter, may create a physical function driver process for creating, or migrating, virtual functions from the first SR-IOV adapter.
In an embodiment, the hypervisor (136) may migrate all virtual functions from one SR-IOV adapter to a single other SR-IOV adapter. However, in other embodiments, the hypervisor (136) may migrate all the running virtual function on an initial SR-IOV adapter, and migrate different virtual functions of all the running virtual functions onto different target SR-IOV adapters. For example, an initial SR-IOV adapter may have 64 running virtual functions, and if the initial SR-IOV adapter needed to be updated or otherwise taken offline, the hypervisor (136) may identify a set of SR-IOV adapters with capacity to run virtual functions. In this case, the hypervisor (136) may then migrate a first group of the virtual functions running on the initial SR-IOV adapter onto a first target SR-IOV adapter of the identified set of SR-IOV adapters, a second group of the virtual functions running on the initial SR-IOV adapter onto a second target SR-IOV adapter of the identified set of SR-IOV adapter, and so on, until all virtual functions of the initial SR-IOV adapter are remapped onto different ones of the identified set of SR-IOV adapters.
Placing (304) the second SR-IOV adapter, and the virtual function, in the error state may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) generating an interrupt to inform both the logical partition and the virtual function to enter into an error state, and to suspend operation. In this example, the logical partition may include a device driver that communicates with the virtual function, and the device driver is the process within the logical partition that enters an error state where the remaining processes in the logical partition may continue executing. In PCIe embodiments, the error state may be the EEH (enhanced I/O error handling) state.
Remapping (306) the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136), and may be performed after the virtual function and the second SR-IOV adapter have entered the error state.
In this example, remapping (306) may be carried out by: updating information for identifying a PCIe slot for the network adapter for a virtual function, in this case, from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; updating specifications of direct memory access (DMA) memory space from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter; updating mappings for memory mapped input output (MMIO) from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter.
Generally, remapping (306) may include updating any configurations or settings that enable a given logical partition to communicate and use physical resources by interfacing with a given virtual function on a given network adapter. After the remapping is complete, the hypervisor may proceed to resuming operation of the virtual function, where the virtual function will resume execution from the second SR-IOV adapter.
Placing (308) the second SR-IOV adapter and the virtual function in an error recovery state may be carried out by the hypervisor (136), and may include the hypervisor (136) generating an interrupt to indicate initiation of an error recovery. In this example, given that the virtual function has been remapped to the second SR-IOV adapter from the first SR-IOV adapter, when the logical partition exits the error recovery state, the logical partition may again communicate with the virtual function where the virtual function executes from the second SR-IOV adapter when the virtual function resumes from the error recovery state.
In an embodiment, the logical partition may not be aware of any remapping, and from the perspective of the logical partition, the virtual function appears unchanged from the period before the error state to the period subsequent from recovering from the error state. In this way, no changes within the logical partition are needed during a migration of the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter.
Turning to
However, the method of
Maintaining (402) a first adjunct partition for the first SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) storing configuration information for the first SR-IOV adapter, and for each of the SR-IOV adapters, in a non-volatile memory area, such as the flash memory (134). Further, while in the error state, if changes are made to the first SR-IOV partition, similar changes may be propagated to the configuration information in the adjunct so that when migration is completed, the changes made will be reflected in the second SR-IOV partition.
Instantiating (404) the second adjunct partition for the second SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) instantiating a virtual machine to be the second adjunct partition, where the second adjunct partition is created with a device driver that is mapped to the physical function of the second SR-IOV adapter.
Configuring (406) the second SR-IOV adapter with the configuration of the first SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) or the second adjunct partition, communicating with the physical function of the second SR-IOV adapter to copy settings and parameters from the first SR-IOV adapter into the second SR-IOV adapter.
Turning now to
However, the method of
Propagating (502) the configuration change request (552) may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) receiving the configuration change request (552) from the management console (554), and providing the configuration change request (552) to the instantiated second adjunct partition, where the second adjunct partition, in response to receiving the configuration change request (552), may communicate with the physical function on the second SR-IOV adapter to set or copy any configuration changes intended for the first SR-IOV adapter into the second SR-IOV adapter.
Turning to
However, the method of
Remapping (602) the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter without modifying I/O parameters in the logical partition may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) performing remapping changes while the logical partition and virtual function is in the error state. In other words, before entering the error state, the logical partition may communicate with the virtual function executing on the first SR-IOV adapter, and after resuming normal operation after exiting the error state, the logical partition may continue to communicate with the virtual function, with no awareness or indication that the virtual function is now operating on a different SR-IOV adapter. As discussed above, this lack of awareness, and hence, lack of modification by the logical partition of any I/O parameters for communicating with the virtual function is due to the hypervisor (136) remapping the virtual function while the logical partition is suspended in an error state—where the remapping operations include: migrating interrupts from one PCIe slot to another PCIe slot, migrating DMA space from one PCIe slot to another PCIe slot, and migrating MMIO mappings from one PCIe slot to another PCIe slot, among others.
Transitioning (604) an internal state of the virtual function from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter may be carried out by the hypervisor (136), or an adjunct partition created for and associated with the second SR-IOV adapter, migrating or copying the execution state of the virtual function, including queues, register values, memory values, and other settings and parameters specifying an execution state, from the first SR-IOV adapter to the second SR-IOV adapter.
Turning to
However, the method of
Removing (702) the first SR-IOV adapter from the configuration of the computer system may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) accessing a stored configuration file that includes configuration information for the first SR-IOV adapter, and deleting the configuration information for the first SR-IOV adapter. For example, the configuration file may be stored in non-volatile memory, for example, the flash memory (134) of the computer system (102).
Turning to
However, the method of
Maintaining (802) a copy of each SR-IOV adapter configuration in a non-volatile memory may be carried out by the hypervisor writing, or burning, the flash memory (134) with configuration information received from a management console directed to a given SR-IOV adapter, including any configuration information updates after creating initial configuration data for the given SR-IOV adapter.
Updating (804) the configuration of the second SR-IOV adapter in the non-volatile memory may be carried out by the hypervisor (136) writing, or burning, the updated configuration information associated with the cloning of the first SR-IOV adapter onto the second SR-IOV adapter into the flash memory (134) of the computer system (102).
The disclosed embodiments are described largely in the context of a fully functional computer system for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment. Readers of skill in the art will recognize, however, that the disclosed embodiments may be embodied in a computer program product disposed upon computer readable storage media for use with any suitable data processing system. Such computer readable storage media may be any storage medium for machine-readable information, including magnetic media, optical media, or other suitable media. Examples of such media include magnetic disks in hard drives or diskettes, compact disks for optical drives, magnetic tape, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Persons skilled in the art will immediately recognize that any computer system having suitable programming means will be capable of executing the steps of the disclosed methods as embodied in a computer program product. Persons skilled in the art will recognize also that, although some of the embodiments described in this specification are oriented to software installed and executing on computer hardware, nevertheless, alternative embodiments implemented as firmware or as hardware are well within the scope of the present disclosure.
The disclosed embodiments for migrating an SR-IOV adapter configuration in a computing environment may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the disclosed embodiments may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In an embodiment, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments.
The disclosed embodiments are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that modifications and changes may be made in various embodiments without departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in this specification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the language of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7039692 | Foster et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7209994 | Klaiber et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7240364 | Branscomb et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7574537 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7613898 | Haertel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7734843 | Bender et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7813366 | Freimuth et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7882326 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937518 | Boyd et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7984262 | Battista et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8219988 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8321722 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327086 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8429446 | Hara et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8533713 | Dong | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8561065 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561066 | Koch et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8607230 | Hatta et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621120 | Bender et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8645755 | Brownlow et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677356 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683109 | Nakayama et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8875124 | Kuzmack et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8984240 | Aslot et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032122 | Hart et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047113 | Iwamatsu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9304849 | Arroyo et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317317 | Graham et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9473400 | DeVilbiss et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9501308 | Arroyo et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9552233 | Tsirkin et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9715469 | Arroyo et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9720862 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9720863 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9740647 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9760512 | Arroyo et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9785451 | Arroyo et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
20020083258 | Bauman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030050990 | Craddock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101377 | Dawkins et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030204648 | Arndt | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040064601 | Swanberg | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040205272 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243994 | Nasu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060095624 | Raj et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060179177 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195618 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195620 | Arndt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060281630 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070157197 | Neiger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070260768 | Bender et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080005383 | Bender et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080114916 | Hummel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147887 | Freimuth et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090007121 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083467 | Giles et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090133016 | Brown et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133028 | Brown et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090249366 | Sen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276551 | Brown et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276773 | Brown et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036995 | Nakayama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100250824 | Belay | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262727 | Arndt | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110197003 | Serebrin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110320860 | Coneski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120042034 | Goggin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120131232 | Brownlow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131576 | Hatta et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137288 | Barrett et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137292 | Iwamatsu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151473 | Koch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167082 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179932 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191935 | Oberly, III et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198187 | Accapadi et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246644 | Hattori et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265910 | Galles et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120297379 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303594 | Mewhinney et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130086298 | Alanis | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130159572 | Graham et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160002 | Graham et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191821 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130268800 | Rangaiah | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140122760 | Grisenthwaite et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149985 | Takeuchi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140181801 | Voronkov et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140245296 | Sethuramalingam et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258570 | Eide et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281263 | Deming et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140351471 | Jebson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140372739 | Arroyo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372789 | Arroyo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372795 | Graham et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372801 | Graham et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006846 | Youngworth | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150052282 | Dong | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150120969 | He et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150193248 | Noel et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193250 | Ito et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150229524 | Engebretsen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150301844 | Droux et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317274 | Arroyo et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150317275 | Arroyo et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160019078 | Challa et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160246540 | Blagodurov et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160350097 | Mahapatra et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170046184 | Tsirkin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170199768 | Arroyo et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170242720 | Anand et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242756 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242763 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101488092 | Jul 2009 | CN |
104737138 | Jun 2015 | CN |
2012-113660 | Jun 2012 | JP |
5001818 | Aug 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Ajila et al., “Efficient Live Wide Area VM Migration With IP Address Change Using Type II Hypervisor”, 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI2013), Aug. 2013, pp. 372-379, IEEE Xplore Digital Library (online), DOI: 10.1109/IRI.2013.6642495. |
PCI-SIG, “Single Root I/O Virtualization and Sharing Specification—Revision 1.0”, Sep. 2007, PCI-SIG Specifications Library, pcisig.com (online), URL: pcisig.com/specifications/iov/single_root/. |
Challa, “Hardware Based I/O Virtualization Technologies for Hypervisors, Configurations and Advantages—A Study”, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing in Emerging Markets (CCEM), Oct. 2012, pp. 99-103, IEEE Xplore Digital Library (online), DOI: 10.1109/CCEM.2012.6354610. |
Xu et al., “Multi-Root I/O Virtualization Based Redundant Systems”, 2014 Joint 7th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 15th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS), Dec. 2014, pp. 1302-1305, IEEE Xplore Digital Library (online), DOI: 10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2014.7044652. |
Appendix P; List of IBM Patent or Applications Treated as Related, Jan. 4, 2017, 2 pages. |
Axnix et al. “IBM z13 firmware innovations for simultaneous multithreading and I/O virtualization”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Jul./Sep. 2015, vol. 59, No. 4/5, 11-1, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Armonk, NY. |
Salapura et al., “Resilient cloud computing”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Sep./Oct. 2013, vol. 57, No. 5, 10-1, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Armonk, NY. |
Xu et al., SRVM: Hypervisor Support for Live Migration with Passthrough SR-IOV Network Devices, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE'16), Apr. 2016, pp. 65-77, ACM New York, NY, USA. |
Huang et al., Nomad: Migrating OS-bypass Networks in Virtual Machines, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE'07), Jun. 2007, pp. 158-168, ACM New York, NY, USA. |
Appendix P; List of IBM Patent or Applications Treated as Related, May 26, 2017, 2 pages. |
Oracle, Updating the Universal HBA Firmware, Oracle Docs, dated Sep. 15, 2013, docs.oracle.com/cd/E24650_01/html/E24461/z40004591045586.html. Accessed Oct. 23, 2017. 4 pages. |
Lynch, Live Partition Mobility, Forsythe, Nov. 11, 2014, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/806,590, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating MMIO From a Source I/O Adapter of a Source Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of a Destination Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 38 pages, filed Nov. 8, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/807,638, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating Interrupts From a Source I/O Adapter of a Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of the Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 28 pages, filed Nov. 8, 2017. |
Appendix P; List of IBM Patent or Applications Treated as Related, Jan. 12, 2018, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/299,512, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating MMIO From a Source I/O Adapter of a Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of the Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 35 pages, filed Oct. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/467,183, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating Interrupts From a Source I/O Adapter of a Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of the Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 35 pages, filed Mar. 23, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/467,025, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating Interrupts From a Source I/O Adapter of a Source Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of a Destination Computing System assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 38 pages, filed Mar. 23, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/467,052, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating MMIO From a Source I/O Adapter of a Source Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of a Destination Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 38 pages, filed Mar. 23, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/617,170, to Jesse P. Arroyo et al., entitled, Migrating MMIO From a Source I/O Adapter of a Computing System to a Destination I/O Adapter of the Computing System, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, 36 pages, filed Jun. 8, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170242720 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |