The present invention relates generally to personal cleansing soap bars which are mild to the skin but which are superior to customary toilet soap bars in removing dirt and grime from the skin but without a noticeable abrasive feel to the bar.
Personal care compositions such as toilet soaps are of course well known. Such toilet soaps in bar form are usually formulated with a wide variety of additives to provide user benefits that are not necessarily inherent in the soap itself. For example, additives are employed to enhance lathering of the soap, to ensure mildness, and to enhance its antibacterial qualities. Many years ago a soap bar containing pumice was brought to market to be used for heavy duty personal cleansing such as to remove heavy soils such as oil, grease and clay. The product is still commercially available and contains about 20% by weight of pumice which is used to mechanically assist removal of such soils. Although effective, such a soap with pumice can damage sensitive skin. It is known in the soap industry that these higher levels of pumice can affect soap making equipment, particularly plodder screws.
So called exfoliating soap bars are also known but many are considered irritating to the skin due to the fact that they have high levels of certain harsh or marginally effective exfolliants. Examples of such prior art toilet bars with exfoliant particles or beads are polytyrene beads, silica, walnut shells, apricot seed and the like as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,376,441; 6,342,470; 6,384,000 and 6,074,998. The particles are usually very hard and impart an undesirable abrasive feel to the bars and can be noticed by the user when bathing or washing the hands.
The present invention is directed to a personal cleansing composition in solid or bar form which is mild to the skin and very effective in removing dirt and grime from the body, particularly the hands. Importantly, such soap bars do not have a noticeable abrasive feel when in contact with the skin. Another important feature is that the composition of the bar is such that it exhibits a so called “drag effect” when the soap bar is used for washing. For example, when the soap bar of this invention is used to wash the hands, the user normally rotates the bar in his/her hands and it is this rotation of the bar which is slowed due to the composition of the bar. This drag effect seems to enhance the removal of dirt and grime.
In a preferred embodiment, the composition of this invention includes:
As previously noted, the presence of the appropriate water insoluble particles crates a drag effect when the bar composition is used in bathing. As the user rotates the bar in the hands when bathing, this drag effect adds to the time that the bar is in contact with the skin and this is a factor in the bar being more effective at removing dirt and grime.
Titanium dioxide: serves as optical brightener
Fragrance
Propylene glycol: serves as a carrier for the fragrance and as a skin conditioner
Aloe Vera: skin conditioner
A personal cleansing bar was prepared having the following ingredients in percentages by weight. This example is provided for illustrative purposes and should not be considered as limiting the scope of this invention.
Manufacture of Bar Compositions
The soap bar compositions of this invention can be manufactured using conventional soap making and processing equipment. The virgin soap pellets, dry additives, color slurry and perfume initially undergo a mixing process in an amalgamator mixer in order to surface coat the pellets with the components. The formulated pellets are then sent through a 5-roll mill to further homogenize the additives throughout the individual pellets. The mill creates ribbons of soap after which they are sent by belted conveyor to the first stage simplex plodder. This first stage plodder re-pelletizes the soap and delivers them directly into the hopper of the second (and final) stage simplex plodder. At this second stage the soap is extruded into a continuous, uniform slug. The continuous slug is cut into individual soap slugs by a bar cutter. The slugs continue onto the infeed belt of a double stroke Simplex press, where they are pressed into the final soap bar.
Comparison to Prior Art Soap Bar
A study was undertaken to determine the amount of soap lost when using the bar soap product of this invention as compared to a commercially available prior art soap product containing about 21% by weight of pumice and sold under the Lava® trademark. A principal object of the study was to calculate the amount of soap lost in washing hands with each product.
Thirty respondents were assembled for the handwashing test. They were instructed to wash their hands 3 times a day for 7 days and to wear gloves during all washes to eliminate any skin irritation. The following protocol was followed:
Protocol:
The results of the study were as follows:
This study indicates that the bar soap of this invention lasted about 30% longer than the prior art pumice containing soap bar.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4557853 | Collins | Dec 1985 | A |
5910476 | Kinsman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6440908 | Racherla | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6764991 | Puvvada et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6818603 | Aleles et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20010046949 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050123574 | Abbas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187129 | Chakrabarty et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192189 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070117728 A1 | May 2007 | US |