The present invention is particularly useful to military vehicles and is a window cover to protect an occupant of the vehicle from being struck by bullets and allow excellent visibility of objects outside the vehicle.
Bullet proof or bullet resistant glass offers some improvement over ordinary glass in combat zones, but even bullet proof glass has its limitations. Typical bullet proof windows are multi-layered assemblies of plastic and glass held in place by a single welded frame that adds hundreds of excess pounds to a vehicle. This type of window also has a high cost of replacement when damaged. Frequently, a single bullet can strike a window and cause tempered glass to fracture into many hairline cracks, or spider cracks that render the window useless.
A particularly useful invention to solve some of the aforementioned problems is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,225,718. The device has mirrors that may receive projectiles and the driver views objects outside of the vehicle through the mirrors. The mirror that is exposed to the exterior of the vehicle may receive a bullet and have a small hole the size of the bullet upon being penetrated. This invention does not provide adjustment of the view from inside the vehicle.
The present invention is a window cover for a vehicle that has an aperture located in place of a window. The cover has an upper armored plate having a top side, an underside, a forward end and a rearward end. The forward end of the upper armored plate is farther from the window aperture relative to the rearward end. The underside, at least partially, extends beyond an upper edge of the viewing aperture. An upper reflector is beneath the underside of the upper armored plate and is pivotable with respect to the viewing aperture and the upper reflector is pivotable with respect to the upper armored plate. The upper reflector has a forward end and a rearward end. The forward end of the upper reflector is farther from the window aperture relative to the rearward end of the upper reflector. A lower armored plate is spaced below the upper armored plate and positioned in front of the viewing aperture. The lower armored plate is for stopping or deflecting a projectile that is directed toward the window cover. A lower reflector has a forward end and a rearward end. The forward end of the lower reflector is further from the window aperture relative to the rearward end of the lower reflector. The forward end of the lower reflector is higher than the rearward end of the lower reflector. The lower reflector is pivotable with respect to the viewing aperture and the armored plate. The lower reflector is positioned beneath the upper reflector.
The present invention is a vehicle window 10 cover useful for military or other vehicles that are likely to be the target of bullets or projectiles. A vehicle with the cover 10 of this invention installed in the location where a front window would be located is shown in
An upper reflector 38 is just below the upper armored plate 14, as shown in
A lower armored plate 46 is below the upper armored plate 14 and in front of the viewing aperture 12. As can be seen in
Behind the lower armored plate 46 is a lower reflector 48. The lower reflector has a forward end 50 farther from the viewing aperture 12 and a rearward end 52 nearer the viewing aperture 12. The forward end 50 is higher than the rearward end 52. The lower reflector 48 can pivot relative to the viewing aperture 12. The lower reflector 48 is mounted on pivot rod 54 near its rearward end 52. A connecting rod 56 is located near the forward end 50. A control rod 60 passes through pivot rod 54 and moves with the lower reflector 48. The control rod 60 is spring loaded so that it is urged toward the forward end 50 of the lower reflector 48. The end of the control rod 60 has teeth 62 that are designed to mate with teeth 64 on a stop block 66. The stop block 66 is mounted to the mounting bracket 40. When the handle 68 of the control rod 60 is pulled toward the interior of the vehicle, the teeth 62, 64 are disengaged as the teeth 62 on the control rod 60 are pulled away from the teeth 64 on the stop block 66. The control rod 60 is spring loaded where it passes through pivot rod 54 so that the teeth 62 on the control rod are biased against the teeth 64 on the stop block 66 when the control rod 60 is released.
A linkage 70 is pivotally connected near it ends at the connector rod 44 of the upper reflector 38 and connector rod 56 of the lower reflector. The linkage 70 is assembled as shown in
Armored slats 76 span the ends 34 of the enclosure 32. Each armored slat has an upper surface 80 a lower surface 82 a forward edge 84 and a rearward edge 86. The forward edge faces away from the upper reflector 38 and the rearward edge 86 is nearer the upper reflector. The thickness of the slats 76 is the distance between the upper and lower surfaces 80, 82. The slats are separated by brackets 84 that maintain a predetermined distance between the slats 76. The slats 76 are made of steel that is durable enough to deflect a projectile that may strike them. An outer window 88 is placed in front of all of the slats 76 to prevent debris from entering the enclosure 32. The slats 76 are positioned so that a projectile entering the outer window 88 would have a trajectory that would require it to pass through at least two slats 76 to enter the viewing aperture 28. The slats 76 are designed of a material that would typically prevent them from being penetrated by a projectile, but in the event that a projectile did pass through one of the slats 76, the second slat 76 within the trajectory would stop the projectile. A wiper 90 is included to clean the outer window 88. The window 88 is made from a material that, when punctured by a projectile, will leave a hole only the size of the projectile.
The angle of each slat 76, with respect to horizontal, is slightly different to make them appear optically as thin as possible to an occupant of the vehicle. The slats 76 are aligned so the rearward edge 86 obscures the forward edge 84 of each slat 76 and all that is visible is the thickness of each slat 76 when viewed from inside the vehicle. The slats 76 are aligned so that this happens when the control rod 60 is in between its highest position and its lowest position.
An occupant of the vehicle, who is the user of the window cover 10, is protected from projectiles and may alter his view of objects in front of the vehicle without leaving the vehicle. As projectiles are fired at the vehicle from above, they will strike a slat and be prevented from passing through the viewing aperture 12. Projectiles fired at an angle, that would allow them to pass through the slats 76, would be prevented from reaching the viewing aperture because such a trajectory would be above the viewing aperture. The occupant can change the view by pulling the control rod 60 toward himself to disengage the teeth 62, 64, moving the upper and lower reflectors 38, 48 through use of the control rod 60 and then releasing the rod 60 so that the teeth 62, 64 maintain the desired position of the reflectors 38, 48. The fact that both reflectors 38, 48 are linked means that smaller reflectors can be used to change the view and also means that less movement of the control rod 60 is needed than if just one of the reflectors moved.
The invention is not limited to the details given above, but may be modified within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/452,431, filed Mar. 14, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3672607 | Stauff et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3966298 | Chapman | Jun 1976 | A |
4005662 | Kohn et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4284326 | Durrer et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4326445 | Bemiss | Apr 1982 | A |
4646616 | Svensson | Mar 1987 | A |
4934246 | Benson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5128803 | Sprafke | Jul 1992 | A |
5452641 | Kariya | Sep 1995 | A |
5815302 | Mc Vey et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6122100 | Miller | Sep 2000 | A |
7225718 | Grove et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7821706 | Bellandi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8037802 | Ciriscioli et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056463 | Grove et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141472 | Grove et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
20090044694 | Allor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110209606 | Grove et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120204711 | Engleman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61452431 | Mar 2011 | US |