This invention relates generally to dairy milker unit liners and more particularly to milker unit teat cup liners with internal flow diverters for distributing teat dip before a milker unit is detached from an animal being milked.
Milking machines are attached to dairy animals to withdraw and collect milk. The part of the milking machine that interfaces with the dairy animal includes an outer shell, called a teat cup, and an interior liner. A dairy animal's teat is inserted into a top opening in the teat cup and liner for milking. With vacuum hoses connected to these components, a pulsation is created that withdraws milk from the dairy animal's teat.
Liners are shaped and sized to maximize animal comfort, and to be efficient and responsive to the vacuum that causes pulsation. Liners have different designs, but all liners or liner assemblies have at least an upper dome and a barrel extending down from the dome. The liner components may be formed in a single unit or the dome and barrel may be separate pieces. The dome defines an opening through which a dairy animal's teat is inserted for milking. The dome also includes an outer skirt that fits down over the top of the teat cup to secure the two components together.
In addition to milking the animal, the vacuum also secures the teat cup and liner to the animal's teat during milking. When milking is completed, the vacuum is reduced so that the teat cup and liner are detached from the animal.
To maintain healthy animals and reduce the incidence of harmful mastitis, teats are treated with antimicrobial cleaners and sealants known as teat dips. These teat dips can be applied before milking or after milking depending on their primary purpose. Teat dips are usually applied by a dairy operator raising a hand-held cup full of teat dip into contact with the teat and possibly the lower udder or by spraying the teats with a hand-held wand.
To reduce manpower and improve animal throughput in a dairy, it is desirable to automate certain procedures normally performed by dairy operators. Applying a post-milking teat dip is one such operation that has been considered for automation.
Teat dip applicators incorporated into a milking machine apply dip to a cow's teat and possibly the lower portion of the udder just prior to detachment of the milking machine from the cow. Teat dip is injected with pumps or pushed with air pressure through nozzles or small orifices that are mounted on the corresponding teat cup or formed in the dome portion of the liner. (See for example: US 2006-0112886-A1.) Given size and time constraints, a single nozzle aimed at the teat applies teat dip to one side of the teat, but the opposite side is less likely to be covered unless a larger dosage of teat dip is injected.
Multiple nozzles have been proposed in an attempt to provide more uniform dip application than might be possible with a single nozzle. Multiple nozzles are fed by multiple tubes from a teat dip source or from a chamber formed in the liner dome. Given the confined nature of the liners within teat cup shells, tubes and chambers must be relatively small, and can be subject to clogging. Multiple nozzles also present increased manufacturing costs.
Another consideration in any such automated teat dip applicator is safety. Teat dips cannot be mixed with milk. Any system used to automatically apply a teat dip that is exposed to the inside of a milker unit liner also exposes the milk to a potential contaminant. As a result, the liner should be backflushed with water or cleansing solutions before the next animal is milked. Such backflushing is also most efficient and consistent if it is done automatically.
Thus, there is a need for an improved mode for delivering teat dip to upper portions of teats through automated dipping equipment.
The present invention overcomes problems associated with teat dip delivery through small or multiple orifices and nozzles formed in milking liner domes. The present invention provides more uniform delivery of teat dip to an upper portion of a teat and/or the lower portion of a cow udder while reducing the amount of teat dip applied, as well as the number of nozzles and orifices that might otherwise be required to obtain substantially uniform teat dip coverage. Further, the liner mouthpiece wipes the teat dip down the teat when the milker unit drops from the cow at the end of milking.
The present invention is a milker unit liner dome that includes internal flow diverters that simplify teat dip distribution and make liner cleaning easier and more thorough. Also, because liners are relatively inexpensive and are replaced regularly, the flow diverter geometry of the liner can be updated without undue expense.
The present invention simplifies distribution of teat dip with a liner dome design that requires no assembly and is relatively inexpensive to manufacture. Further, dips of various viscosities can be used with reduced clogging.
A milker unit liner in accordance with the present invention includes a dome having an opening through which a cow's teat extends during milking. When a teat is inserted, a dome chamber is essentially divided into an annular space. A liner dome in accordance with the present invention has joined to its inner surface a flow diverter such as a ramp, channel, vane, ridge, or other shape to direct flow of teat dip and/or cleaning fluid from an inlet to all portions of the teat including the side that is opposite the teat dip inlet. A flow diverter in accordance with the present invention improves the flow characteristics of dip through the dome as compared to a standard dome chamber.
The present invention may include an improved inlet or nozzle in the form of a slit in the liner and acts essentially as a one-way valve to prevent milk, cleaning fluid, or debris from flowing or being forced into the teat dip delivery hole. The slit can be molded into the dome or cut after the molding process used to manufacture the dome. The inlet may also be a simple hole with the supply tube blocked at times to prevent vacuum leakage or backflow of fluids. This hole or port can then be cleaned each time the dipping process takes place.
The flow diverters in accordance with the present invention can also be utilized to simplify teat dip delivery tubes that are connected to the liner and/or outer shell. For example, some delivery tubes require an elbow to redirect flow into a radial flow toward the teat. The present invention can include ramps for redirecting upward flow into a radially inward flow without the need for an elbow.
Other features and embodiments will become apparent in the detailed description below.
In
The liner 20 is sized and shaped to fit into a conventional outer shell or “teat cup” (not illustrated) so that the top of the teat cup fits in the recess 27 between the skirt 24 and the barrel 26. This relationship secures the liner 20 to the teat cup and forms a seal for the vacuum. The liner barrel 26 may have any cross-sectional shape including round and square. Alternatively, a liner can comprise a separate dome and barrel that are connected to each other directly or indirectly using a teat cup or the other suitable device. The present invention is directed to a dome 22 having an inner surface to which flow diverters are joined regardless of the type, size, or shape of barrel. The liner 20 can be made of rubber, silicone, or other suitable materials.
The delivery channel 28 can be formed integrally with the other liner components or attached after the liner 20 is formed. The delivery channel 28 may also be a separate component so long as it is attached to the liner 20 to act as a conduit for teat dip or cleaning fluids being introduced into the dome 300.
The liner dome 300 further includes a teat dip distribution structure having an inlet 366 (see
The inlet 366 can also be a simple opening in the dome 300, and a delivery tube may be used in combination with the inlet 366 so that the delivery tube defines the flow characteristics or a valve and the inlet 366 simply provides an opening through which teat dip passes into the dome 300. Regardless of its shape or size, the inlet 366 is preferably joined to the dome 22 by being formed integrally in the liner dome 22, but the inlet 366 can be joined to the dome 22 in any other suitable manner.
The inlet 366 is connected via the delivery channel 28 to a teat dip source and/or a backflushing source (not illustrated). In this manner, teat dip 367 (
When entering dome 300 of this embodiment, teat dip flows generally upward in a direction approximately parallel to the longitudinal axis of the liner. Teat dip then flows along a flow path defined by a direction that the inlet is aimed, but which is generally and preferably toward the dome 300. In other embodiments, the flow path can be oriented in a generally radially inward direction or in a tangential direction, but with the flow diverters of the present invention, any inlet orientation can be used so long as the inlet directs fluid substantially toward at least one of the flow diverters.
If left to flow directly toward a teat, most of the dip would be applied to the side of the teat closest to the inlet 366, with some flow possibly reaching other sides of the teat if the dosage quantity is high enough. It is unlikely in practice that dip would reach all teat sides and even less likely that teat dip application would be uniform as preferred.
To redirect the inward and radial flow, the flow bifurcating vane 312 is disposed adjacent to the inlet 366 and in a flow path defined by the inlet 366. The flow bifurcating vane 312 is shaped to split and redirect the upward flow from the inlet 366 into a substantially annular flow path or pattern around the periphery of the dome inner surface 302. As depicted, the flow bifurcating vane 312 splits the flow substantially evenly in each direction to define a pair of flow paths, but if other inlets are used or other conditions warrant, the flow could be split in other proportions or simply redirected in a desired flow path.
The inlet 366 preferably defines two ramped and arcuate surfaces 320 on which the teat dip flows as it is being redirected. In this embodiment, a raised central portion 322 is used to confine the flow so that teat dip is not flowing directly toward the teat. In alternate embodiments, it is possible to permit some of the flow to be applied directly to the teat without being substantially redirected. In such embodiments, the central portion 322 may include openings, slots or ramps through or over which teat dip can flow. It is even permissible for some of the dip to flow over the bifurcating vane 312 and directly toward the teat. Further, the arcuate surfaces 320 can be shaped so that teat dip flow is not directed around the periphery, but instead through a flow pattern or radius that is smaller than the dome chamber's 302 periphery.
The flow ridges 314 preferably have arcuate shapes and contact surfaces that are joined to the inner surface 302 of the dome 300 and arranged in the flow path. The flow ridges 314 are shaped and sized to redirect the peripheral teat dip flow inward toward a cow's teat. In a preferred embodiment, the flow ridges 314 have a height dimension that redirects all the teat dip flowing from the flow bifurcating vane 312. In alternate embodiments, the height of the flow ridges 314 could be reduced to permit some of the flow to by-pass the flow ridges 314 and flow to the part of the inner surface 302 opposite the flow bifurcating vane 312 or to other flow diverters (as described below). Further, the flow ridges 314 are depicted as being symmetrical, but they could be different sizes, shapes, positions, or orientations to provide asymmetric flow, if desired.
Most types of teat dip that would be flowing through the dome 300 have an inherent surface tension that helps establish a desired flow characteristic by remaining adjacent to the dome 300 surface and to the cow's teat so that the dip will cover areas of the teat that are not in the direct flow path defined by the flow diverters.
The flow diverters of the present invention are joined to the inner surface of the dome by being molded integrally with the dome, or they may be joined to the inner surface of the dome with glue or any other suitable means.
The delivery channel 360 has at its upper end an inlet 366 that may be the same diameter of the delivery channel 360 or in the form of a nozzle or slit that is either molded into the liner 350 or cut after the liner 350 is molded. A slit inlet 366 is biased toward a closed position and will close when no pressurized teat dip is flowing up through the delivery channel 360, yet it is flexible enough to permit passage of teat dip when it is fed through the delivery channel 360. As such, the inlet 366 performs as a one-way valve in the way of a more intricately formed “duck-billed” valve. Other inlet shapes and styles can be used in all the embodiments of the present invention, including openings of the same or larger diameter of the delivery channel 360.
The inlet 366 feeds a first flow diverter that in this embodiment is a pair of diverging channels 368 adjacent to the inlet 366 that redirect the flow of teat dip around the teat opening 356. The channels 368 are formed in a preferred shape as illustrated, but other shapes and orientations are possible within the scope of this invention. Indeed, the particular number of channels 368, their shape, orientation, and depth can vary depending upon teat dip viscosity, flow velocity, and flow volume, for example.
The channels 368 being open also aid in backflushing and cleaning of the milk liner 350 periodically or prior to another cow being milked. Nonetheless, closed flow diverters can be used in the present invention. In addition, other flow diverters can be used in combination with the channels 368 to provide substantially uniform distribution of teat dip.
The ridges 510 can be of other shapes and heights to ensure uniform teat dip coverage for a given teat dip viscosity, for example. In addition, the ridges 510 are segmented or shorter than a complete helix so that the liner domes and openings are more flexible and conforming to a teat.
The flow bifurcator 512 includes a central divider 514 and two ridges 516 that are spaced apart from the central divider 514. The inside surface 502 of the dome 500 is concave and the flow diverters 510 and flow bifurcator 512 may extend at different angles depending upon their respective radial positions inside the dome surface 502.
This embodiment is somewhat easier to manufacture because the delivery channel 555 and inlet 554 are both directed upwardly. No elbows or bends are necessary in the delivery tube 555 because the flow is directed upwardly in a longitudinal flow path parallel to the liner barrel and onto a flow diverter 564 that is shaped to redirect the flow radially inwardly toward the ridges 510. Alternatively, as stated above, the inlet 554 can be directed radially inwardly or tangentially. Again, any size or orientation of an inlet can be used so long as it provides an opening for teat dip.
When the delivery channel 555 is disposed inside the shell it is desirable to position the delivery channel 555 where it will be spaced apart from the barrel 528. This is so that the liner 551 does not contact the inside of a shell, or inner delivery channel. Doing so could cause premature liner failure. The liner barrel 528 illustrated in
Such an arrangement can also be seen in the alternative dome 600 of
In this embodiment, the flow into the dome 600 begins from an inlet that is directed generally upward and parallel to a longitudinal axis of the liner (“longitudinal direction”). The delivery channel can be formed integrally with the barrel of the liner or be a separate device connected to the liner.
The embodiments of
Yet another embodiment of a dome 800 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
In the preferred embodiments, teat dip is distributed around a teat as evenly as possible. To do so, most of the dip should be directed tangentially around the teat. Nonetheless, some of the dip may be allowed to flow over the flow bifurcators or directly to a teat so that approximately one-third of the flow reaches the teat directly. The remaining teat dip (approximately two-thirds of the total amount) is directed with the various flow diverters to reach the teat sides positioned away from the inlet. The teat dip flowing tangentially to a teat adheres to the teat surface and flows for nearly uniform coverage due to surface tension and fluid momentum.
When utilizing the present invention, it is desired that the milker unit remain attached to a teat for a slightly longer period than normal to ensure that teat dip is properly applied after milking has ended. This time period is relatively brief, but it is desired that a pulsator unit that is used to apply the vacuum for milking cows also be utilized to keep the milker unit attached while the teat dip is being applied.
To do so, the pulsator is actuated to collapse the liner barrel around the teat while dip is applied through the dome and flow diverters described above. Collapsing the liner barrel also benefits teat dip application and coverage because the teat dip tends to pool around the teat and then be wiped down the length of the teat as the liner and milker unit are detached from the cow. Thus, the present invention improves teat dip coverage on all sides of the teat, as well as, along the length of the teat.
Also, by synchronizing teat dip application and milker unit detachment, the milker unit can be supported as it drops from a cow, and is less likely to strike the deck on which the cows stand when being milked.
The foregoing detailed description of the invention is provided for clearness of understanding only and no undue limitations therefrom should be read into the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,528, filed Jan. 13, 2012, which, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/215,706, filed Jun. 27, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1365665 | Davies | Jan 1921 | A |
2012031 | Woodruff | Aug 1935 | A |
2532088 | Cordis | Nov 1950 | A |
2747544 | Thomas | May 1956 | A |
3014455 | Olander | Dec 1961 | A |
3099246 | Beskow | Jul 1963 | A |
3461845 | Peterson | Aug 1969 | A |
3474760 | Hoffman et al, | Oct 1969 | A |
3482547 | Maier | Dec 1969 | A |
3630081 | Nelson | Dec 1971 | A |
3648696 | Keith | Mar 1972 | A |
3696790 | Albright | Oct 1972 | A |
3713423 | Sparr, Sr. | Jan 1973 | A |
3726253 | Duncan | Apr 1973 | A |
3762371 | Quayle et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3789798 | Reisgies et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3797525 | Lieser | Mar 1974 | A |
3861335 | Przewalski | Jan 1975 | A |
3861355 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3957018 | Barrett | May 1976 | A |
3971512 | Duncan | Jul 1976 | A |
3973520 | Flocchini | Aug 1976 | A |
4034714 | Umbaugh et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4149489 | Umbaugh et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4168677 | Brown | Sep 1979 | A |
4175514 | Souza et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4177760 | Slater | Dec 1979 | A |
4222346 | Reisgies | Sep 1980 | A |
4253421 | Slater et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4295490 | Boudreau | Oct 1981 | A |
4305346 | Sparr, Sr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4332215 | Larson | Jun 1982 | A |
4333421 | Schluckbier | Jun 1982 | A |
4372345 | Mehus | Feb 1983 | A |
4378757 | Hamann | Apr 1983 | A |
4393811 | Bodmin | Jul 1983 | A |
4395971 | Happel et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4403569 | Bennett | Sep 1983 | A |
4459938 | Noorlander | Jul 1984 | A |
4462425 | Mehus | Jul 1984 | A |
4485762 | Sutton et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4498419 | Flocchini | Feb 1985 | A |
4516530 | Reisgies et al. | May 1985 | A |
4572105 | Chowdhury et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4586462 | Icking | May 1986 | A |
4593649 | Britten | Jun 1986 | A |
4903639 | Kessel | Feb 1990 | A |
4907535 | Matsuzawa et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924809 | Verbrugge | May 1990 | A |
4936254 | Marshall | Jun 1990 | A |
5052341 | Woolford et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5101770 | Stevenson | Apr 1992 | A |
5134967 | Marshall | Aug 1992 | A |
5161482 | Griffin | Nov 1992 | A |
5166313 | Archibald et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167201 | Peles | Dec 1992 | A |
5178095 | Mein | Jan 1993 | A |
5218924 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5255628 | Kristoffer | Oct 1993 | A |
5379722 | Larson | Jan 1995 | A |
5386799 | Dietrich | Feb 1995 | A |
5390627 | van der Berg et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403005 | Avila-Valdez | Apr 1995 | A |
5493995 | Chowdhury | Feb 1996 | A |
5568788 | van den Berg et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572947 | Larson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5673650 | Mottram et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697325 | Gehm et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722343 | Aurik | Mar 1998 | A |
5769025 | van der Lely et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778820 | van der Lely | Jul 1998 | A |
5850845 | Pereira et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5881669 | van den Berg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896828 | Kronschnabel | Apr 1999 | A |
5909716 | van der Lely | Jun 1999 | A |
5934220 | Hall et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957081 | van der Lely et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960736 | Ludington | Oct 1999 | A |
5992347 | Innings et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009833 | van der Lely | Jan 2000 | A |
6089242 | Buck | Jul 2000 | A |
6098570 | Aurik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6202593 | Maier et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234110 | Xavier | May 2001 | B1 |
6244215 | Oosterling | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267077 | van den Berg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276297 | van den Berg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308655 | Oosterling | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318299 | Birk | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321682 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6367416 | van der Lely | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371046 | Petterson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435132 | Milbrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6546893 | Happel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550420 | Bjork | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561126 | Forsen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6584930 | Buecker | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591784 | Eriksson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598560 | van den Berg | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6619227 | Berger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626130 | Eriksson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644240 | Dietrich | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6752102 | Dahl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755153 | Chowdhury | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6935270 | Wipperfurth et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6997136 | Coates | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7036981 | Veenstra et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128020 | Bjork et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143718 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174848 | Brown et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178480 | Dahl et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7263948 | Ericsson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281493 | Dietrich | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290497 | Rottier et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7350478 | Fernandez | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377232 | Holmgren et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7401573 | Torgerson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412943 | Ericsson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7536975 | Denes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7575022 | Higgins | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578260 | Shin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7707966 | Torgerson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7765951 | Dietrich | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793614 | Ericsson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7926449 | Stellnert et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963249 | Duke | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8025029 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8033247 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8117989 | Torgerson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8210123 | Duke | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240272 | Duke | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8342125 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8590486 | Torgerson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8677937 | Shin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8770146 | Buck et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8925483 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9016238 | Duke | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9049835 | Duke | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020185071 | Guo | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040089242 | Verstege | May 2004 | A1 |
20050274327 | Johnsson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060037542 | Denes et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060112887 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070070803 | Urquhart | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157887 | Fernandez | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186860 | Dietrich | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215053 | Duke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070277737 | Maier et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022932 | Rottier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080202433 | Duke | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276871 | Auburger et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314322 | Stellnert et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090050061 | Duke | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050062 | Auburger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064937 | Rottier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090151641 | Schulze Wartenhorst et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165724 | Mader et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090320760 | Torgerson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100132626 | Torgerson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154900 | Torgerson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100236487 | Stellnert et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100326360 | Duke et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110220028 | Duke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110220160 | Bosma | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232575 | Duke | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120111275 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118237 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118238 | Torgerson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120272911 | Duke | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130199449 | Daniel | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140283751 | Buck et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150201577 | Duke | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
641229 | Sep 1993 | AU |
1582939 | Jul 1970 | DE |
2622794 | Dec 1977 | DE |
3540058 | May 1987 | DE |
261300 | Oct 1988 | DE |
4006785 | Sep 1990 | DE |
10160161 | Jun 2003 | DE |
0277396 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0313109 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0319523 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0459817 | Dec 1991 | EP |
04793997 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0332235 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0527509 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0630557 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0728412 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0801893 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0543463 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1219167 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1222853 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1089615 | Mar 2003 | EP |
0945057 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1328148 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1520469 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1543720 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1737291 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1790217 | May 2007 | EP |
1795069 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1679956 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2113169 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1933616 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2277373 | Jan 2011 | EP |
918766 | Feb 1963 | GB |
1160900 | Aug 1969 | GB |
1440901 | Jun 1976 | GB |
0324647.7 | Oct 2003 | GB |
0402119.2 | Jan 2004 | GB |
0408968.6 | Apr 2004 | GB |
0417392.8 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2002-345955 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002354958 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2005-192404 | Jul 2005 | JP |
1016237 | Mar 2002 | NL |
1021950 | May 2004 | NL |
1676538 | Sep 1991 | SU |
9313651 | Jul 1993 | WO |
9828969 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9927775 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9946978 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9966767 | Dec 1999 | WO |
9966787 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0117337 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0117338 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0207506 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0223976 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03077645 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03030630 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03098998 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004030445 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004032608 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005022986 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005043986 | May 2005 | WO |
2005072516 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005102035 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006029797 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006110079 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006117019 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006135917 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007031783 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007129884 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007129888 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008102567 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008138862 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009077607 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009158000 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010053577 | May 2010 | WO |
2011028292 | Mar 2011 | WO |
201128293 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011028294 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2014016588 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015118336 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015145116 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015150807 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3-A® Accepted Practices for Permanently Installed Product and Solution Pipelines and Cleaning Systems Used in Milk . . . , No. 605-04, (Section N), 3pp. |
Akam, D.N., The Development of Equipment for the Mechanization of Manual Operations . . . 17th Annual Mtg. Nat'l Mastitis Counsel, Inc., pp. 417-426, Feb. 21-23, 1978. |
Grindal et al., Automatic application of teat disinfectant through the milking machine cluster, Journal of Dairy Research, 56:579-585 (1989), 7pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2011/00322, dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Letter to Alex Ferguson from Jeffry W. Smith dated Dec. 22, 2006, 2pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744 dated Jun. 3, 2010, 8pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/652,372 dated Feb. 11, 2008, 14pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/662,454 dated Aug. 16, 2010, 20pp. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,769 dated Feb. 20, 2008, 9pp. |
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Apr. 21, 2006, 16pp. |
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Aug. 7, 2008, 1 Opp. |
Shearn et al., “Reduction of bacterial contamination of teatcup liners by an entrained wash system,” Institute for Animal Health, Veterinary Record (1994), 134,450, 1p. |
Thompson, et al., The End-of-Milking Sequences and its Mechanization, 1976 Winter Mtg., Dec. 14-17, 1976, Animal Physiology and Genetics Inst. Beltsville, MD, 15pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/578,997, filed Jun. 12, 2004, Kevin L. Torgerson. |
PCT/US09/03770-373, IPRP and Written Opinion rec'd Jan. 13, 2011, and ISR & Written Opinion rec'd Oct. 7, 2009. |
PCT/US06/023075—ISR & Written Opinion rec'd Oct. 16, 2006. |
PCT/GB04/004343—Written Opinion of ISA rec'd Feb. 3, 2005, 5pp. |
PCT/US09/006026—IPRP, Written Opinion of ISA & ISR rec'd Mar. 6, 2010, 9pp. |
Neijenhuis et al. Health of dairy cows milked by an automatic milking system, Oct. 2003, 23 pages. |
Grade A pasteurized milk ordinance, 2003 Revision des US Department Health and Human Services, Public Health Service food and Drug Administration. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/712,787 dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
PCT/GB04/004343—Written Opinion of ISA & IPRP, 5pp. |
PCT/US06/023075—ISR & Written Opinion. |
PCT/US09/006026—IPRP, Written Opinion of ISA & ISR, 9pp. |
PCT/US09/03770—IPRP and Written Opinion and ISR. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,313, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,314, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke. |
Notice of Opposition and Opposition brief for EP Patent 1737291, Filed on Aug. 26, 2014 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH, 74 pages. |
Proprietor response filed Feb. 2, 2015, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 53 pages. |
European Search Report issued Sep. 24, 2015 for EP Application No. 15171008.4, 6 pages. |
Reply filed on Dec. 16, 2015 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH in the Opposition of EP Patent No. 1737291, 75 pages. |
Wildbrett et al., “Über Reinigung und Desinfektion von Tanks” Materials and Corrosion 12(12):759-764. Nov. 1961. |
European Patent Office Preliminary Opinion and Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued Jan. 18, 2016, apposition of EP Patent 1737291, 12 pages. |
European Search Report issued Aug. 13, 2014, EP Application No: 14159588.4, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150164036 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13350528 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14627240 | US | |
Parent | 12215706 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13350528 | US |