Milk tube dome with flow controller

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9770006
  • Patent Number
    9,770,006
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 31, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 26, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A milker unit liner dome having an inner surface and flow diverters joined to the inner surface to redirect teat dip from an inlet to provide more uniform coverage of dip on a teat. The liner dome can also include more than one flow diverter for redirecting teat dip flow.
Description
FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to dairy milker unit liners and more particularly to milker unit teat cup liners with internal flow diverters for distributing teat dip before a milker unit is detached from an animal being milked.


Milking machines are attached to dairy animals to withdraw and collect milk. The part of the milking machine that interfaces with the dairy animal includes an outer shell, called a teat cup, and an interior liner. A dairy animal's teat is inserted into a top opening in the teat cup and liner for milking. With vacuum hoses connected to these components, a pulsation is created that withdraws milk from the dairy animal's teat.


Liners are shaped and sized to maximize animal comfort, and to be efficient and responsive to the vacuum that causes pulsation. Liners have different designs, but all liners or liner assemblies have at least an upper dome and a barrel extending down from the dome. The liner components may be formed in a single unit or the dome and barrel may be separate pieces. The dome defines an opening through which a dairy animal's teat is inserted for milking. The dome also includes an outer skirt that fits down over the top of the teat cup to secure the two components together.


In addition to milking the animal, the vacuum also secures the teat cup and liner to the animal's teat during milking. When milking is completed, the vacuum is reduced so that the teat cup and liner are detached from the animal.


To maintain healthy animals and reduce the incidence of harmful mastitis, teats are treated with antimicrobial cleaners and sealants known as teat dips. These teat dips can be applied before milking or after milking depending on their primary purpose. Teat dips are usually applied by a dairy operator raising a hand-held cup full of teat dip into contact with the teat and possibly the lower udder or by spraying the teats with a hand-held wand.


To reduce manpower and improve animal throughput in a dairy, it is desirable to automate certain procedures normally performed by dairy operators. Applying a post-milking teat dip is one such operation that has been considered for automation.


Teat dip applicators incorporated into a milking machine apply dip to a cow's teat and possibly the lower portion of the udder just prior to detachment of the milking machine from the cow. Teat dip is injected with pumps or pushed with air pressure through nozzles or small orifices that are mounted on the corresponding teat cup or formed in the dome portion of the liner. (See for example: US 2006-0112886-A1.) Given size and time constraints, a single nozzle aimed at the teat applies teat dip to one side of the teat, but the opposite side is less likely to be covered unless a larger dosage of teat dip is injected.


Multiple nozzles have been proposed in an attempt to provide more uniform dip application than might be possible with a single nozzle. Multiple nozzles are fed by multiple tubes from a teat dip source or from a chamber formed in the liner dome. Given the confined nature of the liners within teat cup shells, tubes and chambers must be relatively small, and can be subject to clogging. Multiple nozzles also present increased manufacturing costs.


Another consideration in any such automated teat dip applicator is safety. Teat dips cannot be mixed with milk. Any system used to automatically apply a teat dip that is exposed to the inside of a milker unit liner also exposes the milk to a potential contaminant. As a result, the liner should be backflushed with water or cleansing solutions before the next animal is milked. Such backflushing is also most efficient and consistent if it is done automatically.


Thus, there is a need for an improved mode for delivering teat dip to upper portions of teats through automated dipping equipment.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes problems associated with teat dip delivery through small or multiple orifices and nozzles formed in milking liner domes. The present invention provides more uniform delivery of teat dip to an upper portion of a teat and/or the lower portion of a cow udder while reducing the amount of teat dip applied, as well as the number of nozzles and orifices that might otherwise be required to obtain substantially uniform teat dip coverage. Further, the liner mouthpiece wipes the teat dip down the teat when the milker unit drops from the cow at the end of milking.


The present invention is a milker unit liner dome that includes internal flow diverters that simplify teat dip distribution and make liner cleaning easier and more thorough. Also, because liners are relatively inexpensive and are replaced regularly, the flow diverter geometry of the liner can be updated without undue expense.


The present invention simplifies distribution of teat dip with a liner dome design that requires no assembly and is relatively inexpensive to manufacture. Further, dips of various viscosities can be used with reduced clogging.


A milker unit liner in accordance with the present invention includes a dome having an opening through which a cow's teat extends during milking. When a teat is inserted, a dome chamber is essentially divided into an annular space. A liner dome in accordance with the present invention has joined to its inner surface a flow diverter such as a ramp, channel, vane, ridge, or other shape to direct flow of teat dip and/or cleaning fluid from an inlet to all portions of the teat including the side that is opposite the teat dip inlet. A flow diverter in accordance with the present invention improves the flow characteristics of dip through the dome as compared to a standard dome chamber.


The present invention may include an improved inlet or nozzle in the form of a slit in the liner and acts essentially as a one-way valve to prevent milk, cleaning fluid, or debris from flowing or being forced into the teat dip delivery hole. The slit can be molded into the dome or cut after the molding process used to manufacture the dome. The inlet may also be a simple hole with the supply tube blocked at times to prevent vacuum leakage or backflow of fluids. This hole or port can then be cleaned each time the dipping process takes place.


The flow diverters in accordance with the present invention can also be utilized to simplify teat dip delivery tubes that are connected to the liner and/or outer shell. For example, some delivery tubes require an elbow to redirect flow into a radial flow toward the teat. The present invention can include ramps for redirecting upward flow into a radially inward flow without the need for an elbow.


Other features and embodiments will become apparent in the detailed description below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a milker liner in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a milker liner dome chamber in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a partial perspective cross-sectional view of a milker unit liner in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a partial perspective cross-sectional view of a liner for a milker unit in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a milker unit liner dome chamber in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a perspective cross-sectional view of a liner in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a side cross-sectional view of the inside of an alternate embodiment of a liner dome in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the inside of an alternate embodiment of a liner dome in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the inside of an alternate embodiment of a liner dome in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the inside top of a liner dome in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In FIG. 1, there is depicted a milker unit liner 20 in accordance with the present invention. The liner 20 includes a dome 22, a skirt 24, a barrel 26, and a delivery channel 28. The skirt 24 extends downward from the dome 22 and is spaced away from the barrel 26 to define a recess 27.


The liner 20 is sized and shaped to fit into a conventional outer shell or “teat cup” (not illustrated) so that the top of the teat cup fits in the recess 27 between the skirt 24 and the barrel 26. This relationship secures the liner 20 to the teat cup and forms a seal for the vacuum. The liner barrel 26 may have any cross-sectional shape including round and square. Alternatively, a liner can comprise a separate dome and barrel that are connected to each other directly or indirectly using a teat cup or the other suitable device. The present invention is directed to a dome 22 having an inner surface to which flow diverters are joined regardless of the type, size, or shape of barrel. The liner 20 can be made of rubber, silicone, or other suitable materials.


The delivery channel 28 can be formed integrally with the other liner components or attached after the liner 20 is formed. The delivery channel 28 may also be a separate component so long as it is attached to the liner 20 to act as a conduit for teat dip or cleaning fluids being introduced into the dome 300.



FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a liner dome 300 in accordance with the present invention, and that is removed from the other liner components and inverted to show an inner surface 302. This dome 300 includes a teat opening 304, and an annular recess 306 for mating with the top of a teat cup (not illustrated).


The liner dome 300 further includes a teat dip distribution structure having an inlet 366 (see FIG. 3), a first flow diverter which is illustrated in this embodiment as a flow bifurcating vane 312, and a second flow diverter which is illustrated as a pair of ridges 314. The inlet 366 is preferably an opening that is the same diameter as the delivery channel 28, but it can be any size or shape to obtain satisfactory flow characteristics or simply provide ease of manufacturing. The inlet 366 could also include a nozzle in the form of a slit, for example, that is either molded into the dome 300 during manufacture or cut into the dome 300 after molding. A slit shape acts as a one-way valve to inhibit the flow of milk, teat dip 367 (FIG. 3), cleaning fluid, and debris from flowing in the wrong direction through the inlet 366.


The inlet 366 can also be a simple opening in the dome 300, and a delivery tube may be used in combination with the inlet 366 so that the delivery tube defines the flow characteristics or a valve and the inlet 366 simply provides an opening through which teat dip passes into the dome 300. Regardless of its shape or size, the inlet 366 is preferably joined to the dome 22 by being formed integrally in the liner dome 22, but the inlet 366 can be joined to the dome 22 in any other suitable manner.


The inlet 366 is connected via the delivery channel 28 to a teat dip source and/or a backflushing source (not illustrated). In this manner, teat dip 367 (FIG. 3) is provided through the inlet 366 under pressure from a pump, air pressure or other suitable device. It is preferred that the teat dip supply device include a mechanical feed system, such as a piston, for example, but pneumatic delivery can also be used. The mechanical feed system is preferred because it minimizes foaming of teat dip solution in the supply lines that can occur when pressurized air is used. Nonetheless, foaming teat dips can also be used with the present invention. A mechanical feed also enables the use of a teat dip dosage device that applies a predetermined amount of dip. It is preferred to use a single inlet 366, but multiple inlets could be used.


When entering dome 300 of this embodiment, teat dip flows generally upward in a direction approximately parallel to the longitudinal axis of the liner. Teat dip then flows along a flow path defined by a direction that the inlet is aimed, but which is generally and preferably toward the dome 300. In other embodiments, the flow path can be oriented in a generally radially inward direction or in a tangential direction, but with the flow diverters of the present invention, any inlet orientation can be used so long as the inlet directs fluid substantially toward at least one of the flow diverters.


If left to flow directly toward a teat, most of the dip would be applied to the side of the teat closest to the inlet 366, with some flow possibly reaching other sides of the teat if the dosage quantity is high enough. It is unlikely in practice that dip would reach all teat sides and even less likely that teat dip application would be uniform as preferred.


To redirect the inward and radial flow, the flow bifurcating vane 312 is disposed adjacent to the inlet 366 and in a flow path defined by the inlet 366. The flow bifurcating vane 312 is shaped to split and redirect the upward flow from the inlet 366 into a substantially annular flow path or pattern around the periphery of the dome inner surface 302. As depicted, the flow bifurcating vane 312 splits the flow substantially evenly in each direction to define a pair of flow paths, but if other inlets are used or other conditions warrant, the flow could be split in other proportions or simply redirected in a desired flow path.


The inlet 366 preferably defines two ramped and arcuate surfaces 320 on which the teat dip flows as it is being redirected. In this embodiment, a raised central portion 322 is used to confine the flow so that teat dip is not flowing directly toward the teat. In alternate embodiments, it is possible to permit some of the flow to be applied directly to the teat without being substantially redirected. In such embodiments, the central portion 322 may include openings, slots or ramps through or over which teat dip can flow. It is even permissible for some of the dip to flow over the bifurcating vane 312 and directly toward the teat. Further, the arcuate surfaces 320 can be shaped so that teat dip flow is not directed around the periphery, but instead through a flow pattern or radius that is smaller than the dome chamber's 302 periphery.


The flow ridges 314 preferably have arcuate shapes and contact surfaces that are joined to the inner surface 302 of the dome 300 and arranged in the flow path. The flow ridges 314 are shaped and sized to redirect the peripheral teat dip flow inward toward a cow's teat. In a preferred embodiment, the flow ridges 314 have a height dimension that redirects all the teat dip flowing from the flow bifurcating vane 312. In alternate embodiments, the height of the flow ridges 314 could be reduced to permit some of the flow to by-pass the flow ridges 314 and flow to the part of the inner surface 302 opposite the flow bifurcating vane 312 or to other flow diverters (as described below). Further, the flow ridges 314 are depicted as being symmetrical, but they could be different sizes, shapes, positions, or orientations to provide asymmetric flow, if desired.


Most types of teat dip that would be flowing through the dome 300 have an inherent surface tension that helps establish a desired flow characteristic by remaining adjacent to the dome 300 surface and to the cow's teat so that the dip will cover areas of the teat that are not in the direct flow path defined by the flow diverters.


The flow diverters of the present invention are joined to the inner surface of the dome by being molded integrally with the dome, or they may be joined to the inner surface of the dome with glue or any other suitable means.



FIG. 3 is an alternate embodiment of the present invention illustrating a cross-section of an upper portion of a liner 350 having a dome 352, a barrel 354, and a teat opening 356. A teat delivery channel 360 is formed integrally with the dome 352. A hose, pipe, or tube (not illustrated) can be joined to the delivery channel 360 as a conduit between a source of teat dip and the delivery tube 360, as described above.


The delivery channel 360 has at its upper end an inlet 366 that may be the same diameter of the delivery channel 360 or in the form of a nozzle or slit that is either molded into the liner 350 or cut after the liner 350 is molded. A slit inlet 366 is biased toward a closed position and will close when no pressurized teat dip is flowing up through the delivery channel 360, yet it is flexible enough to permit passage of teat dip when it is fed through the delivery channel 360. As such, the inlet 366 performs as a one-way valve in the way of a more intricately formed “duck-billed” valve. Other inlet shapes and styles can be used in all the embodiments of the present invention, including openings of the same or larger diameter of the delivery channel 360.


The inlet 366 feeds a first flow diverter that in this embodiment is a pair of diverging channels 368 adjacent to the inlet 366 that redirect the flow of teat dip around the teat opening 356. The channels 368 are formed in a preferred shape as illustrated, but other shapes and orientations are possible within the scope of this invention. Indeed, the particular number of channels 368, their shape, orientation, and depth can vary depending upon teat dip viscosity, flow velocity, and flow volume, for example.


The channels 368 being open also aid in backflushing and cleaning of the milk liner 350 periodically or prior to another cow being milked. Nonetheless, closed flow diverters can be used in the present invention. In addition, other flow diverters can be used in combination with the channels 368 to provide substantially uniform distribution of teat dip.



FIG. 4 is another embodiment of a liner 370 having a dome 372, a barrel 374, a teat opening 376, a delivery channel 380, an inlet 386, and a flow diverter in the form of channels 388. The primary difference between this and the FIG. 3 embodiment is the shape, depth, and orientation of the channels 388, which in this embodiment provide a different teat dip flow pattern. The channels 388 are fed by a first channel 389 to form an essentially y-shaped combination of channels. Again, the inlet 386 in this and all other embodiments of the present invention, provides an opening into the dome 372 and need not affect the flow characteristics or direction of teat dip.



FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate yet another liner dome 500 embodiment in accordance with the present invention having an inner surface 502, a radially inwardly directed inlet 504 fed by a delivery channel 505, a teat opening 506, a plurality of flow diverters that are, in this embodiment, ridges 510, and a flow diverter that is a flow bifurcator 512 adjacent to the inlet 504. Each ridge 510 is spaced apart from the inlet 504 and from each other to form a flow path that is substantially helical in shape and originates from the inlet 504 and terminates around the teat opening 506. Teat dip flows upward and through a bend or elbow in the delivery channel 505 to the radially directed inlet 504, toward the flow bifurcator 512, and against the ridges 510 to establish substantially uniformly coat a teat.


The ridges 510 can be of other shapes and heights to ensure uniform teat dip coverage for a given teat dip viscosity, for example. In addition, the ridges 510 are segmented or shorter than a complete helix so that the liner domes and openings are more flexible and conforming to a teat.


The flow bifurcator 512 includes a central divider 514 and two ridges 516 that are spaced apart from the central divider 514. The inside surface 502 of the dome 500 is concave and the flow diverters 510 and flow bifurcator 512 may extend at different angles depending upon their respective radial positions inside the dome surface 502.



FIG. 7 illustrates a liner 551 and shell 561 assembly, with the liner including a barrel 528 and an alternate embodiment of a dome 550 having an inner surface 552, a delivery channel 555, an upwardly directed inlet 554, and a plurality of flow diverters in the form of a flow bifurcator 564 and a number of ridges 560. The flow path in this embodiment is upward from the delivery channel 555, through the inlet 554, and into the dome 550. Once in the dome 550, the flow is diverted by the flow bifurcator 564 and against the ridges 560. The flow continues through the dome 550 and around the teat opening 506, for more uniform coverage of an animal teat disposed in the liner.


This embodiment is somewhat easier to manufacture because the delivery channel 555 and inlet 554 are both directed upwardly. No elbows or bends are necessary in the delivery tube 555 because the flow is directed upwardly in a longitudinal flow path parallel to the liner barrel and onto a flow diverter 564 that is shaped to redirect the flow radially inwardly toward the ridges 510. Alternatively, as stated above, the inlet 554 can be directed radially inwardly or tangentially. Again, any size or orientation of an inlet can be used so long as it provides an opening for teat dip.


When the delivery channel 555 is disposed inside the shell it is desirable to position the delivery channel 555 where it will be spaced apart from the barrel 528. This is so that the liner 551 does not contact the inside of a shell, or inner delivery channel. Doing so could cause premature liner failure. The liner barrel 528 illustrated in FIG. 7 is triangular shaped when viewed in cross-section from the top. Other shapes such as round or square can also be used. A triangular or square barrel should be located in the shell so that it will not have contact with the delivery channel. This can also be achieved with round liners by sizing the diameter of the liner to not contact the delivery channel or by slightly modifying the barrel geometry, either with small ribs or with slight variances in wall thickness, forcing the liner to collapse in a defined plane.


Such an arrangement can also be seen in the alternative dome 600 of FIG. 8. This dome 600 has an inner surface 602, a teat opening 606, a plurality of flow diverters in the form of ridges 612, and a flow diverter in the form of a flow bifurcator 614 adjacent to the inlet (inlet not illustrated). The flow bifurcator 614 includes a ramp 620 and a pair of ridges 616. The ramp 620 redirects the upward flow from an inlet (not visible in this figure) and inwardly toward the ridges 612. The ridges 616 cooperate with the ramp 620 to confine the flow and direct it toward the inside of the ridges 612.


In this embodiment, the flow into the dome 600 begins from an inlet that is directed generally upward and parallel to a longitudinal axis of the liner (“longitudinal direction”). The delivery channel can be formed integrally with the barrel of the liner or be a separate device connected to the liner.



FIG. 9 illustrates another alternate dome 700 having an inner surface 702, a teat opening 706, a plurality of flow diverters in the form of ridges 712, and another flow diverter in the form of an ramped flow controller 714 adjacent to an inlet (not illustrated) that is directed longitudinally relative to the liner barrel and toward the inner surface 702 of the dome 700, as described above. This embodiment uses fewer, but longer ridges 712 than were described above in relation to the FIGS. 5 to 9 embodiments. This embodiment also uses an inlet flow controller 714 having a pair of flared ridges 716, a ramp 718, and a flow bifurcator 720 that direct incoming teat dip toward the teat opening 706, but with a flow component that is slightly radially outward toward the flow diverters 712.


The embodiments of FIGS. 5 through 8 that use relatively short ridges, as opposed to a continuous ridge, have the benefit of having less of an influence on the shape and flexibility of the dome. Large ridges tend to stiffen the dome, while shorter ridges allow the dome to remain more flexible, which can be desirable. In addition, cleaning smaller flow ridges is easier and they create a smaller “shadow” area in which cleaning fluid might not reach. Smaller flow ridges also drain easier and retain less dip and cleaning liquids, so they are less likely to contaminate milk of the next animal to be milked.


Yet another embodiment of a dome 800 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 10. This embodiment includes an inner surface 802, a teat opening 806, and a plurality of flow diverters in the form of a bifurcator 810, a pair of channels 811, and ridges 812. The inlet 813 is an upwardly directed inlet similar to the one illustrated in FIG. 7. The bifurcator 810 is shaped to redirect the upwardly directed (“longitudinal”) flow toward the channels 811 and along the outer edge of the dome 800 and toward the ridges 812. The ridges 812 redirect the flow inwardly toward the teat opening 806.


In the preferred embodiments, teat dip is distributed around a teat as evenly as possible. To do so, most of the dip should be directed tangentially around the teat. Nonetheless, some of the dip may be allowed to flow over the flow bifurcators or directly to a teat so that approximately one-third of the flow reaches the teat directly. The remaining teat dip (approximately two-thirds of the total amount) is directed with the various flow diverters to reach the teat sides positioned away from the inlet. The teat dip flowing tangentially to a teat adheres to the teat surface and flows for nearly uniform coverage due to surface tension and fluid momentum.


When utilizing the present invention, it is desired that the milker unit remain attached to a teat for a slightly longer period than normal to ensure that teat dip is properly applied after milking has ended. This time period is relatively brief, but it is desired that a pulsator unit that is used to apply the vacuum for milking cows also be utilized to keep the milker unit attached while the teat dip is being applied.


To do so, the pulsator is actuated to collapse the liner barrel around the teat while dip is applied through the dome and flow diverters described above. Collapsing the liner barrel also benefits teat dip application and coverage because the teat dip tends to pool around the teat and then be wiped down the length of the teat as the liner and milker unit are detached from the cow. Thus, the present invention improves teat dip coverage on all sides of the teat, as well as, along the length of the teat.


Also, by synchronizing teat dip application and milker unit detachment, the milker unit can be supported as it drops from a cow, and is less likely to strike the deck on which the cows stand when being milked.


The foregoing detailed description of the invention is provided for clearness of understanding only and no undue limitations therefrom should be read into the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A milker unit liner comprising: a barrel; anda dome joined to the barrel, and the dome comprises: an upper inner surface defining a teat opening;a flow diverter joined to the upper inner surface of the dome, and the flow diverter includes a ridge extending generally downward and away from the upper inner surface to at least partially define an open teat dip flow path along the upper inner surface of the dome while the milker unit liner is generally upright and attached to a dairy animal teat, and the open teat dip flow path at least partially surrounds the teat opening to direct teat dip to a teat extending through the teat opening;a teat dip inlet to the dome directed to the flow diverter to direct teat dip flow into contact with the flow diverter; anda delivery channel extending substantially parallel to a longitudinal axis of the barrel and in fluid communication with the teat dip inlet.
  • 2. The milker unit liner dome of claim 1, wherein the flow diverter has an end adjacent to the teat dip inlet and an end that is spaced apart from the teat dip inlet.
  • 3. The milker unit liner dome of claim 1, wherein the flow diverter includes an arcuate flow contact surface.
  • 4. The milker unit liner dome of claim 1, wherein the teat dip inlet is a slot.
  • 5. The milker unit liner dome of claim 1, wherein the teat dip inlet comprises a one-way valve.
  • 6. The milker unit liner dome of claim 1, and further comprising a second flow diverter including a ridge joined to the upper inner surface of the dome and the second flow diverter at least partially defines the open teat dip flow path along the upper inner surface of the dome.
  • 7. The milker unit liner of claim 1, wherein the flow diverter is shaped to redirect teat dip flow from a substantially upward and longitudinal direction relative into the barrel to a flow pattern against the upper inner surface of the dome.
  • 8. The milker unit of claim 1, wherein the delivery channel is joined to an outer surface of the dome.
  • 9. The milker unit of claim 1, wherein the delivery channel extends between the barrel and an outer surface of the dome.
  • 10. The milker unit of claim 1, wherein the delivery channel is spaced radially outward from the barrel.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/627,240, filed Feb. 20, 2015, which, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/350,528, filed Jan. 13, 2012, which, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/215,706, filed Jun. 27, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (173)
Number Name Date Kind
1365665 Davies Jan 1921 A
2012031 Woodruff Aug 1935 A
2532088 Cordis Nov 1950 A
2747544 Thomas May 1956 A
3014455 Olander Dec 1961 A
3099246 Beskow Jul 1963 A
3461845 Peterson Aug 1969 A
3474760 Hoffman et al. Oct 1969 A
3482547 Maier Dec 1969 A
3630081 Nelson Dec 1971 A
3648696 Keith Mar 1972 A
3696790 Albright Oct 1972 A
3713423 Sparr, Sr. Jan 1973 A
3726253 Duncan Apr 1973 A
3762371 Quayle et al. Oct 1973 A
3789798 Reisgies et al. Feb 1974 A
3861335 Przewalski Jan 1975 A
3861355 Johnson et al. Jan 1975 A
3957018 Barrett May 1976 A
3971512 Duncan Jul 1976 A
3973520 Flocchini Aug 1976 A
4034714 Umbaugh et al. Jul 1977 A
4149489 Umbaugh et al. Apr 1979 A
4168677 Brown Sep 1979 A
4175514 Souza et al. Nov 1979 A
4177760 Slater Dec 1979 A
4222346 Reisgies Sep 1980 A
4253421 Slater et al. Mar 1981 A
4295490 Boudreau Oct 1981 A
4305346 Sparr, Sr. Dec 1981 A
4332215 Larson Jun 1982 A
4333421 Schluckbier Jun 1982 A
4372345 Mehus Feb 1983 A
4378757 Hamann Apr 1983 A
4393811 Bodmin Jul 1983 A
4395971 Happel et al. Aug 1983 A
4403569 Bennett Sep 1983 A
4459938 Noorlander Jul 1984 A
4462425 Mehus Jul 1984 A
4485762 Sutton et al. Dec 1984 A
4498419 Flocchini Feb 1985 A
4516530 Reisgies et al. May 1985 A
4572105 Chowdhury et al. Feb 1986 A
4586462 Icking May 1986 A
4593649 Britten Jun 1986 A
4903639 Kessel Feb 1990 A
4907535 Matsuzawa et al. Mar 1990 A
4924809 Verbrugge May 1990 A
4936254 Marshall Jun 1990 A
5052341 Woolford et al. Oct 1991 A
5101770 Stevenson Apr 1992 A
5134967 Marshall Aug 1992 A
5161482 Griffin Nov 1992 A
5166313 Archibald et al. Nov 1992 A
5167201 Peles Dec 1992 A
5178095 Mein Jan 1993 A
5218924 Thompson et al. Jun 1993 A
5255628 Kristoffer Oct 1993 A
5379722 Larson Jan 1995 A
5386799 Dietrich Feb 1995 A
5390627 van der Berg et al. Feb 1995 A
5403005 Avila-Valdez Apr 1995 A
5493995 Chowdhury Feb 1996 A
5568788 van den Berg et al. Oct 1996 A
5572947 Larson et al. Nov 1996 A
5673650 Mottram et al. Oct 1997 A
5697325 Gehm et al. Dec 1997 A
5722343 Aurik Mar 1998 A
5769025 van der Lely et al. Jun 1998 A
5778820 van der Lely Jul 1998 A
5850845 Pereira et al. Dec 1998 A
5881669 van den Berg et al. Mar 1999 A
5896828 Kronschnabel Apr 1999 A
5909716 van der Lely Jun 1999 A
5934220 Hall et al. Aug 1999 A
5957081 van der Lely et al. Sep 1999 A
5960736 Ludington Oct 1999 A
5992347 Innings et al. Nov 1999 A
6009833 van der Lely Jan 2000 A
6089242 Buck Jul 2000 A
6098570 Aurik et al. Aug 2000 A
6202593 Maier et al. Mar 2001 B1
6234110 Xavier May 2001 B1
6244215 Oosterling Jun 2001 B1
6267077 van den Berg et al. Jul 2001 B1
6276297 van den Berg et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308655 Oosterling Oct 2001 B1
6318299 Birk Nov 2001 B1
6321682 Eriksson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6367416 van der Lely Apr 2002 B1
6371046 Petterson Apr 2002 B1
6435132 Milbrath et al. Aug 2002 B1
6546893 Happel et al. Apr 2003 B1
6550420 Bjork Apr 2003 B1
6561126 Forsen et al. May 2003 B2
6584930 Buecker Jul 2003 B2
6591784 Eriksson Jul 2003 B1
6598560 van den Berg Jul 2003 B1
6619227 Berger et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626130 Eriksson Sep 2003 B1
6644240 Dietrich Nov 2003 B1
6752102 Dahl et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755153 Chowdhury Jun 2004 B1
6935270 Wipperfurth et al. Aug 2005 B2
6997136 Coates Feb 2006 B1
7036981 Veenstra et al. May 2006 B2
7128020 Björk et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143718 Bosma et al. Dec 2006 B2
7174848 Brown et al. Feb 2007 B2
7178480 Dahl et al. Feb 2007 B2
7263948 Ericsson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7281493 Dietrich Oct 2007 B2
7290497 Rottier et al. Nov 2007 B2
7350478 Fernandez Apr 2008 B2
7377232 Holmgren et al. May 2008 B2
7401573 Torgerson Jul 2008 B2
7412943 Ericsson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7536975 Denes et al. May 2009 B2
7575022 Higgins Aug 2009 B2
7578260 Shin Aug 2009 B2
7707966 Torgerson et al. May 2010 B2
7765951 Dietrich Aug 2010 B2
7793614 Ericsson et al. Sep 2010 B2
7926449 Stellnert et al. Apr 2011 B2
7963249 Duke Jun 2011 B2
8025029 Torgerson et al. Sep 2011 B2
8033247 Torgerson et al. Oct 2011 B2
8117989 Torgerson et al. Feb 2012 B2
8210123 Duke Jul 2012 B2
8240272 Duke Aug 2012 B2
8342125 Torgerson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8590486 Torgerson et al. Nov 2013 B2
8677937 Shin Mar 2014 B2
8770146 Buck Jul 2014 B2
8991335 Torgerson Mar 2015 B2
9016238 Duke Apr 2015 B2
9049835 Duke Jun 2015 B2
20020185071 Guo Dec 2002 A1
20030226520 Dietrich Dec 2003 A1
20040089242 Verstege May 2004 A1
20050274327 Johnsson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060016399 Torgerson et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060037542 Denes et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060112887 Brown et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070070803 Urquhart Mar 2007 A1
20070157887 Fernandez Jul 2007 A1
20070186860 Dietrich Aug 2007 A1
20070215053 Duke Sep 2007 A1
20070277737 Maier et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080022932 Rottier et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080202433 Duke Aug 2008 A1
20080276871 Auburger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080314322 Stellnert et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090050061 Duke Feb 2009 A1
20090050062 Auburger et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090064937 Rottier et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090151641 Schulze Wartenhorst et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090165724 Mader et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090320760 Torgerson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100132626 Torgerson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154900 Torgerson et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100236487 Stellnert et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100326360 Duke et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110220028 Duke Sep 2011 A1
20110220160 Bosma Sep 2011 A1
20110232575 Duke Sep 2011 A1
20120111275 Torgerson et al. May 2012 A1
20120118237 Torgerson et al. May 2012 A1
20120118238 Torgerson et al. May 2012 A1
20120272911 Duke Nov 2012 A1
20130199449 Daniel Aug 2013 A1
20140283751 Buck et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150201577 Duke Jul 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (82)
Number Date Country
641229 Sep 1993 AU
2622794 Dec 1977 DE
3540058 May 1987 DE
261300 Oct 1988 DE
4006785 Sep 1990 DE
1582939 Jun 2003 DE
10160161 Jun 2003 DE
0277396 Aug 1988 EP
0313109 Apr 1989 EP
0319523 Jun 1989 EP
0459817 Dec 1991 EP
0479397 Sep 1992 EP
0332235 Dec 1992 EP
0527509 May 1994 EP
0630557 Dec 1994 EP
0728412 Aug 1996 EP
0801893 Oct 1997 EP
0543463 Mar 2001 EP
1219167 Jul 2002 EP
1222853 Jul 2002 EP
1089615 Mar 2003 EP
0945057 Jul 2003 EP
1520469 Apr 2005 EP
1543720 Jun 2005 EP
1737291 Nov 2005 EP
1790217 May 2007 EP
1795069 Jun 2007 EP
1679956 Dec 2008 EP
2113169 Nov 2009 EP
1933616 Jan 2011 EP
2277373 Jan 2011 EP
918766 Feb 1963 GB
1160900 Aug 1969 GB
1440901 Jun 1976 GB
0324647.7 Oct 2003 GB
0402119.2 Jan 2004 GB
0408968.6 Apr 2004 GB
0417392.8 Apr 2004 GB
2002-345955 Dec 2002 JP
2002354958 Dec 2002 JP
2005-192404 Jul 2005 JP
1016237 Mar 2002 NL
1021950 May 2004 NL
1676538 Sep 1991 SU
9313651 Jul 1993 WO
9828969 Jul 1998 WO
9927775 Dec 1998 WO
9946978 Sep 1999 WO
9966767 Dec 1999 WO
9966787 Dec 1999 WO
0117337 Mar 2001 WO
0117338 Mar 2001 WO
0207506 Jan 2002 WO
0223976 Mar 2002 WO
03030630 Apr 2003 WO
03077645 Sep 2003 WO
03098998 Dec 2003 WO
2004030445 Apr 2004 WO
2004032608 Apr 2004 WO
2005022986 Mar 2005 WO
2005043986 May 2005 WO
2005072516 Aug 2005 WO
2005102035 Nov 2005 WO
2006029797 Mar 2006 WO
2006110079 Oct 2006 WO
2006117019 Nov 2006 WO
2006135917 Dec 2006 WO
2007031783 Mar 2007 WO
2007129884 Nov 2007 WO
2007129888 Nov 2007 WO
2008102567 Aug 2008 WO
2008138862 Nov 2008 WO
2009077607 Jun 2009 WO
2009158000 Dec 2009 WO
2010053577 May 2010 WO
2011028292 Mar 2011 WO
2011028293 Mar 2011 WO
2011028294 Mar 2011 WO
2014016588 Jan 2014 WO
2015118336 Feb 2015 WO
2015145116 Oct 2015 WO
2015150807 Oct 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (30)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,313, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/566,314, filed Apr. 29, 2004, J.R.J. Duke.
European Search Report issued Aug. 13, 2014, EP Application No. 14159588.4, 5 pages.
Grade A pasteurized milk ordinance, 2003 Revision des US Department Health and Human Services, Public Health Service food and Drug Administration.
3-A® Accepted Practices for Permanently Installed Product and Solution Pipelines and Cleaning Systems Used in Milk . . . , No. 605-04, (Section N), 3pp.
Akam, D.N., The Development of Equipment for the Mechanization of Manual Operations . . . 17th Annual Mtg. Nat'l Mastitis Counsel, Inc., pp. 417-426, Feb. 21-23, 1978.
Grindal et al., “Automatic application of teat disinfectant through the milking machine cluster” Journal of Dairy Research, 56:579-585 (1989).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2011/00322, dated Dec. 20, 2011.
Letter to Alex Ferguson from Jeffry W. Smith dated Dec. 22, 2006, 2pp.
Neijenhuis et al. Health of dairy cows milked by an automatic milking system, Oct. 2003, 23 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744 dated Jun. 3, 2010, 8pp.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/652,372 dated Feb. 11, 2008, 14pp.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/662,454 dated Aug. 16, 2010, 20pp.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,769 dated Feb. 20, 2008, 9pp.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/712,787 dated Jun. 27, 2011.
PCT/GB04/004343—Written Opinion of ISA & IPRP rec'd Feb. 3, 2005, 5pp.
Wildbrett et al., “Über Reinigung und Desinfektion von Tanks” Materials and Corrosion 12(12):759-764. Nov. 1961.
PCT/US06/023075—ISR & Written Opinion rec'd Oct. 16, 2006.
PCT/US09/006026—IPRP, Written Opinion of ISA & ISR rec'd Mar. 6, 2010, 9pp.
PCT/US09/03770—IPRP and Written Opinion rec'd Jan. 13, 2011, and ISR rec'd Oct. 7, 2009.
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Apr. 21, 2006, 16pp.
Preliminary Amendment for U.S. Appl. No. 10/576,744, filed Aug. 7, 2008, 10pp.
Sheam et al., “Reduction of bacterial contamination of teatcup liners by an entrained wash system,” Institute for Animal Health, Veterinary Record (1994),134,450, 1p.
Thompson, et al. “The End-Of-Milking Sequence and its Mechanization” 1976 Winter Mtg., Dec. 14-17, 1976, Animal Physiology and Genetics Inst., Beltsville, MD, 15pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/578,997, filed Jun. 12, 2004, Kevin L. Torgerson.
Notice of Opposition and Opposition brief for EP Patent 1737291, Filed on Aug. 26, 2014 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH, 74 pages.
Proprietor response filed Feb. 2, 2015, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 53 pages.
European Search Report issued Sep. 24, 2015 for EP Application No. 15171008.4, 6 pages.
Reply filed on Dec. 16, 2015 by GEA Farm Technologies GmbH in the Opposition of EP Patent No. 1737291, 75 pages.
European Patent Office Preliminary Opinion and Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued Jan. 18, 2016, Opposition of EP Patent 1737291, 12 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160205888 A1 Jul 2016 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14627240 Feb 2015 US
Child 15087319 US
Parent 13350528 Jan 2012 US
Child 14627240 US
Parent 12215706 Jun 2008 US
Child 13350528 US