The invention relates to a method for milling a ground surface, as well as to a milling machine.
In mining, earthwork and rock operations, the mining of solid earth materials in the form of milled material offers a great advantage over drilling and blasting as it can be performed with much greater economic efficiency.
The milling machine, generally called a surface miner, is able to crush the mined material to such a small size that it can be processed without any or requiring only minor subsequent treatment. The material removed by a milling drum is loaded, via loading conveyors, onto a truck that travels along next to the milling machine. In the process, the milled material is cut, crushed and finally loaded.
A known method provides that the ground surface of an opencast mining surface is milled along a predetermined milling track having a predetermined length. In the process, the milling operation is optimized, in terms of milling depth and milling speed, in accordance with the machine's power and the type of material to be milled.
The milled material is transported via a conveying device to at least one container of a truck that travels along next to the milling machine, said truck having a predetermined maximum loading volume per load. Once the truck is fully loaded, it is replaced with an unloaded truck.
At the end of the milling track, the milling machine turns so that an adjoining milling track can be removed. It is of disadvantage in this process that the truck may not be fully loaded at the end of the milling track so that the vehicle either needs to transport the milled material away being only partially loaded, or else needs to wait for the turning manoeuvre to be completed, in which case the working process will have to be interrupted once again during the next truck change until changing of the trucks has been completed. In order to minimize the breaks in operation, it is also known to use truck and trailer combinations that are provided with one or several trailers. With such truck and trailer combinations, there is the problem all the more, however, of the truck and trailer combination not being fully loaded at the end of the milling track. As such a truck is not able to perform a turning manoeuvre, there is the problem all the more in this arrangement of it not being possible to fully load the truck and trailer combination.
A further problem lies in loading the container of a truck evenly in order to be able to make maximum use of the container volume.
It is therefore the object of the present invention to specify a method for milling an opencast mining surface that can be performed with greater economic efficiency.
To this end, the following is provided in accordance with the method according to the present invention:
The invention enables the milling operation to be optimized in such a manner that, at the end of a current milling track, the container of a truck is, or containers of a truck are, also completely filled so that journeys of the trucks or truck and trailer combinations with containers not fully loaded are avoided, thus also minimizing the number of breaks in operation for the purpose of changing the trucks.
At the same time, the advance speed may be increased, for example, when working at a reduced milling depth so that the time required for milling off a milling track can be reduced.
It is preferably provided that the adjustable total milling volume of the milling machine in a milling track is adjusted to match a total loading volume which results from the volume of the nearest lower whole number of loads.
In this case, adjustment of the total milling volume to match the specified effective total loading volume is preferably effected by altering the milling depth. The reason for this is that, by reducing the milling depth, the total milling volume within a milling track can be reduced in such a fashion that it corresponds to the specified effective total loading volume that enables a whole number of loads to be achieved in a milling track.
An alternative possibility consists in adjusting the total milling volume to match the specified effective total loading volume by altering the effective working width by selecting a different overlap of adjoining milling tracks.
In this case, the milling depth optimized for the milling process is maintained, and the reduction of the total milling volume for adjustment to the total loading volume is adjusted by partly travelling over the previous milling track.
It is provided in this arrangement that the advance speed of the milling machine is adjusted to match the effective total milling volume in such a fashion that a preselected milling power, preferably maximum milling power, is maintained or achieved.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the milling process and the even loading of the container, it may also be provided that the travel speed of the truck is controlled, as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine, in such a fashion that the loading space of the at least one container is loaded evenly and fully over the length up to the maximum loading volume.
This is preferably effected by regulating the loading process by means of controlling the travel speed of the truck as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine and of the measured loading condition of a container.
The travel speed or the current position of the truck may alternatively be controlled as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine, or of the distance travelled by the milling machine in the current milling track, or of the current discharge position of the transport device.
It may further be provided that the travel speed or the current position of the truck is controlled in such a fashion that the discharge position of the conveying device above the at least one container moves from a front or rear end position inside the container to an end position that is opposite in longitudinal direction.
The travel speed of the truck is preferably controlled in such a fashion that the travel speed of the truck is higher than or equal to the advance speed of the milling machine.
It may alternatively be provided that the travel speed of the truck is controlled in such a fashion that the travel speed shows a constant positive difference to the advance speed of the milling machine.
It may alternatively be provided that the travel speed of the truck is controlled in such a fashion that the travel speed of the truck is altered in a discontinuous fashion.
At the beginning of the loading process, it may be provided that controlling the travel speed of the truck at a higher travel speed than the advance speed of the milling machine begins only after a sufficiently high initial fill has been discharged at the front or rear end position.
The method can be applied to advantage in particular when truck and trailer combinations with several trailers connected to one another in an articulated fashion are used.
In order to enable a continuous loading process, it is particularly advantageous in this arrangement if containers on several trailers connected to one another in an articulated fashion are used in which the upper end edges of the opposite end walls of adjacent containers overlap.
Containers may be used in this arrangement, the opposite end walls of which are provided with a mutually adapted curvature about an axis orthogonal to the ground surface in such a fashion that the opposite end walls have a smallest possible mutual distance but enable a mutual turning movement of the trailers both laterally and in a ramp transition area nonetheless.
Containers may also be used, the front end wall side of which is curved in a convex manner and is provided, preferably at the front end edge, with a projecting collar that covers a driver's cabin of the truck and/or the rear upper concavely curved end edge of the end wall of a container travelling ahead.
In the following, one embodiment of the invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the drawings.
An opencast pit has a size of, for example, approx. 100 m in width and approx. 500 m in length.
As can be seen from
The ground surface is removed along a predetermined milling track having a predetermined length.
The milled material is conveyed via a conveying device, for instance, a transport conveyor 2, to at least one container of a truck 1 that travels along next to the milling machine, said truck 1 having a predetermined maximum loading volume per load.
A fully loaded truck is replaced with an unloaded truck when the maximum loading volume of a truck load has been reached.
The control unit 12 of the milling machine 3 calculates
The control unit 12 then adjusts the adjustable total milling volume of the milling machine over the length of the milling track to match the effective total loading volume that results in a whole number of loads.
For the purpose of setting and adjusting the total milling volume, the control unit 12 can calculate the effective total loading volume which results from the nearest lower whole number of loads.
For the purpose of adjusting the adjustable total milling volume to match the specified effective total loading volume, the control unit 12 can alter, preferably reduce, the milling depth.
For the purpose of adjusting the adjustable total milling volume to match the specified effective total loading volume, the control unit 12 can alternatively alter the effective working width by selecting a different overlap of adjoining milling tracks.
The control unit 12 can set the advance speed of the milling machine to a preselected milling power, preferably maximum milling power.
In addition, the control unit 12 can control the travel speed of the truck as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine in such a fashion that the loading space of the at least one container is loaded evenly and fully over the length up to the maximum loading volume.
The control unit 12 can regulate the loading process of at least one container by controlling the travel speed of the truck as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine and of the measured loading condition of the container.
The control unit 12 can control the travel speed or the current position of the truck as a function of the advance speed of the milling machine, or of the distance travelled by the milling machine in the current milling track, or of the current discharge position of the transport device in relation to the truck.
In this arrangement, the control unit 12 can control the travel speed or the current position of the truck in such a fashion that the discharge position of the conveying device above the at least one container moves from a front or rear end position inside the container to an end position that is opposite in longitudinal direction.
Preferably, the control unit can control the travel speed of the truck in such a fashion that the travel speed of the truck is higher than or equal to the advance speed of the milling machine.
The control unit 12 can increase the travel speed of the truck only after a sufficiently high initial fill has been reached at the front or rear end position.
The containers may be arranged on several trailers connected to one another in an articulated fashion, in which case the adjacent upper end edges of the opposite end walls overlap.
The adjacent end walls of the containers on the several trailers connected to one another in an articulated fashion may be provided with a mutually adapted curvature about an axis orthogonal to the ground surface in such a fashion that the end walls have a smallest possible mutual distance but enable a lateral turning movement of the trailers nonetheless.
The containers may be curved in a convex manner at the front end wall side and be provided, preferably at the front end edge, with a projecting collar that covers a driver's cabin of the truck and/or the rear upper concavely curved end edge of the end wall of a container travelling ahead.
A dimensioning and control concept for automated opencast mining is described in the following. The procedure comprises the following steps:
The fundamental advantage of the following control concept lies in the fact that a continuous loading process between truck and opencast milling machine, where both machines travel at a constant speed, is especially easy to realize with regard to the control concept and requires almost no communication between the milling machine and the truck (except at the beginning and at the end of the loading process).
The principle of the present invention consists in controlling the truck speed and direction as a function of the actual position and speed of the milling machine (or of the position and speed of the conveyor belt of the milling machine respectively), the cutting depth and cutting width of the milling machine and other process parameters known in advance, such as the maximum payload of the truck, the equivalent loading length of the truck and the density of the milled material.
Calculation of the optimal cutting depth as a function of the vertically progressing layer mining process:
General Definitions And Relations:
Known Process Parameters And Variables:
Unknown process variables to be determined (in the sequence of clarification):
Calculation procedure:
The material volume that needs to be loaded on a ramp can be calculated from
In a similar fashion, the material volume that needs to be loaded on the flat part can be derived from
Qflat,act=lflat,act·FT,act·FB·L.
The total material that needs to be loaded for the entire track is simply
Qtotal,act=Qflat,act+2·Qramp,act.
Substituting the material volume of the ramp and the flat part results in
which can be further simplified to
The total weight to be loaded is
Mtotal,act=Qtotal,act·ρmat
The number of truck loads required for the total load is
ntrucks=Mtotal,act/Mpay .
A recalculation of the required cutting depth can now be performed quite easily by solving the aforementioned equations for the cutting depth, which results in
The current total horizontal distance of the flat part can be determined by initially calculating the distance of the ramp
The remaining distance of the flat part lflat,act can then be calculated from (
lflat,act=lmin e,act−2·lramp,act.
The total horizontal distance lmin e,act for calculation of the next layer equals the last calculated distance of the flat part
lmin e,act=lflat,act,
with the exception of the first calculation, where said length needs to be set to the maximum initial horizontal distance lmin e,max.
Control Law For The Truck Speed:
General Definitions And Relations
Known Process Parameters And Variables:
Unknown process variables to be determined (in the sequence of clarification):
The truck-loading cross-sectional area as a function of the surface milling machine speed, the cutting depth, the cutting width and the truck speed can be calculated by using the following simple assumptions and relations:
The material delivered by the milling machine 3 during a specific loading time tlc can be calculated from
Qlc=FT·FB·νSM·L·tlc={dot over (q)}·tlc.
The resulting cross-sectional loading area of the truck tray can be calculated from
Atray,cr=Qlc/llc
where llc represents an equivalent loading length assuming that the load deposited on the truck resembles a cuboid.
By substituting the material volume and the loading length one obtains
which means that for a given cutting depth, a given cutting width and a given loosening factor the cross-sectional loading area is a function of the milling machine speed and the difference of milling machine speed and truck speed. This relation can be verified quite easily. Assuming that the truck is stationary (Vtruck=0), it results from the aforementioned relation that
Atray,cr=FT·FB·L,
which means that the material cross-section to be cut by the milling machine, multiplied by the loosening factor, needs to be stored in the truck 1.
To be able to obtain a particular cross-sectional loading area of the truck tray, equation (1) produces a control law for adjusting the truck speed and/or the milling machine speed for a given cutting depth and cutting width. In practice, the loading area is subject to a limitation that is due to the maximum payload of the truck tray. With a given maximum payload of the truck tray, the maximum material volume that can be loaded during one loading cycle is defined by
Qlc,max=Mpay/ρmat.
The maximum material volume can then be translated into a maximum cross-sectional loading area
Atray,cr,max=Qlc,max/llc (2).
Inserting (2) into (1) and solving (1) for the truck speed produces a feedforward control law for the truck speed:
The basic structure of a truck control unit is depicted in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 008 260 | Feb 2008 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3608968 | Burnett | Sep 1971 | A |
4376609 | Bohman et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4647248 | Wirtgen | Mar 1987 | A |
4863009 | Winkel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5575316 | Pollklas | Nov 1996 | A |
5857274 | Rüdiger et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6247510 | Diekhans et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6366684 | Turner | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6682416 | Behnke et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6943824 | Alexia | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7831345 | Heino et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8337118 | Buschmann et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8499537 | Correns et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528988 | Von Schonebeck | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8590983 | Berning et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9126776 | von Schonebeck | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20030174207 | Alexia et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050179309 | Berning et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207841 | Holl et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060045621 | Potts et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080173740 | Parker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080258535 | Berning et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090044505 | Huster et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090229233 | Pollklass et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090267402 | Berning et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100014917 | Willis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110061762 | Madsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064274 | Madsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110123268 | Berning et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20130076101 | Simon | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080000 | Von der Lippe et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
155157 | May 1982 | DE |
19628420 | Jan 1998 | DE |
102005035480 | Feb 2007 | DE |
202007005756 | Aug 2008 | DE |
1574122 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2100495 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2301318 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2452551 | May 2012 | EP |
2573267 | Mar 2013 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Database Compendex XP-002538700, Engineering Information, Inc., Wolski Jan K, “Optimization of Bucket Wheel Excavator and Pit Parameters in Application to Overburden Stripping”, Conference Proceeding “Use of Computers in the Coal Industry”,1986, pp. 43-55. |
Database Compendex XP-002538699, Engineering Information, Inc., Gove et al. “Optimizing Truck-Loader Matching”, Mining Engineering, Oct. 1994, pp. 1179-1185, Soc. for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Inc. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2009. (not prior art). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,586 to Jorn Von der Lippe, dated Mar. 31, 2015, 28 pp. (not prior art). |
European Search Report in corresponding European Publication EP 13 18 1254, dated Nov. 4, 2013, 3 pp (not prior art). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160061030 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13965892 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14841819 | US | |
Parent | 12865041 | US | |
Child | 13965892 | US |