The subject work relates to the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparatus and pertains to RF surface coil geometry for the excitation and observation of magnetic resonance signals.
The conventional apparatus for MRI comprises a magnet producing a strong DC magnetic field Bo in the imaged object. Typically the magnet is a superconducting magnet and its axis may either be oriented vertically or horizontally, depending upon the design. Within a bore is a set of gradient coils producing a distribution of magnetic fields within the object being imaged as is required for MRI. One or more RF coils are placed near the sample to produce an RF magnetic field B1 to stimulate the magnetic resonance of a given nuclear species in the object, and the same coil or a separate coil to detect any resonances that are produced in the object. The apparatus includes a RF transmitter to generate the required RF current supplied to the stimulating RF coil and a RF receiver to amplify and detect the response of the stimulated nuclei. A controller is used to control the field gradients, the RF transmitting signal the receiver response, and to collect the data and form the required image.
When a single RF coil is used, the same coil serves to produce the stimulating RF field B1, and to receive the response from the nuclei. The RF coil may be a volume coil that surrounds the sample, such as a solenoid coil, a Helmholtz coil pair, a birdcage coil, or a surface coil that only partially surrounds the sample. The RF coil is switched to the RF transmitter that generates an RF pulse that, when coupled to the RF coil, stimulates the nuclei. The RF coil is then switched to the receiver that amplifies and detects the responding signal from the nuclei. Radio frequency transmission lines couple the RF coil or coils located in the magnet with the MRI apparatus located nearby outside of the magnet.
In systems with two RF coils, one is used to produce the stimulating RF field B1 and the other to receive the response from the nuclei. These systems typically use a large volume coil to produce a uniform RF magnetic field over the sample volume, and a surface coil to pick up signals in the nearby region of the sample with high sensitivity. The transmitter is first pulsed on for a short time period, after which the receiver is turned on to detect the nuclear response signal. When the transmitter is on the receiver channel is partially blocked to prevent the strong transmitter signals from damaging the receiver. The problem that occurs in these systems arises from the coupling between the two coils. During transmit phase, RF fields from the transmitter coil induce voltages in the receiver coil, causing currents to flow in the receiver coil that produce additional RF fields in the object being imaged. These fields add and subtract from the RF fields of the transmitter coil causing the resulting RF field to be inhomogeneous. Also during the receive phase, signals from the nuclei are absorbed in the transmitter coil with a loss of signal power. In addition, any noise in the transmitter circuit is coupled into the receiver thereby lowering the signal to noise ratio. One way to alleviate this problem is to place the coils such that their RF magnetic fields are orthogonal. This in practice is difficult to do with a high degree of accuracy, making it desirable to find other ways to reduce these undesirable effects.
A number of authors (for example, A. Asfour et al. “Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings”, 2008-05-12, pages 945-950; U.S. Pat. No. 5,559,434) have shown that by actively detuning the receiver coil during the transmitter phase and actively detuning the transmitter coil during the receiver phase greatly reduces these problems. Active detuning was achieved by using a pin diode to switch in an inductive or capacitive element across some part of the transmitter or receiver coil. The switch is activated by passing or removing an externally applied bias current flowing through the pin diode as illustrated in
In the U.S. Pat. No. 7,501,828 it is suggested to devise a circuit that employs two pin diodes that does not require any bias voltage when the detune circuit is not active. This patent describes a circuit wherein a pin diode is inserted in each lead of the reactive element used to provide the detuning. Either both cathodes or both anodes of the two pin diodes connect separate leads of the reactive element. When activated by an external voltage, both pin diodes are turned on and the reactive element is coupled to the coil and provides the detuning. When no external voltage is applied one of the diodes is always off since the RF voltage across the diodes always has the opposite polarity. The external bias voltage source is decoupled from the RF coil by radio frequency choke coils that have high impedance at RF frequencies but low impedance to the switching voltages.
A RF receiver with a surface RF coil is particularly applicable to the imaging of small animals. To observe the magnetic resonance signals with the highest sensitivity the coil structure must be placed very close or perhaps in contact with the region of the object or animal being studied can provide the high filling factor and high sensitivity. The same RF coil or a different RF coil may serve as the transmitter coil.
One variation of a surface coil is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,306. This patent describes a surface coil in the form of two coupled ladder resonator coils, with a first mode circuit path for detecting or generating magnetic flux in a vertical axis from the surface of the coil and a second mode circuit path for detecting or generating magnetic flux in a parallel to the surface of the coil, with the first mode and second mode currents 90 degrees out of phase. The design features fixed capacitors in the resonator rungs with the rungs coupled together by inductors forming a low-pass design.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,401 describe a flexible open quadrature high-pass ladder structure RF surface coil in magnetic resonance imaging. This design includes a central rung having a capacitive element Cv disposed symmetrically about a midpoint, and a like number of additional rungs are disposed parallel to and symmetrically on opposite sides of the central rung. The side elements include fixed capacitive elements Ca, which interconnect adjacent ends of each of the rungs forming a high-pass circuit. Both of these patents require fixed capacitors either in series with the rung elements or between rung elements, which because of their size, cause problems particularly in surface coils for the imaging of small animals. In addition fixed capacitors typically have a different magnetic susceptibility that the surrounding region thereby causing unwanted gradients in the DC magnetic field Bo.
The present invention realizes a surface coil featuring a high density of rungs thereby achieving increased RF field homogeneity and improved RF conductivity, and without the need of a fixed capacitor associated with each rung element. This is extremely important for small animal imaging where there is insufficient space to accommodate the introduction of even small size chip capacitors. Another advantage of the present invention is that the coil array is fixed to a flexible insulating material and can be shaped to fit closely to the contour of the region of the object that is to be imaged or studied. By using many closely spaced electrically conducting elements the distributed capacitance between adjacent rung elements is sufficient to provide resonance at or near the desired operating frequency thereby eliminating the need for fixed capacitors in series with each rung element.
In prior art RF coil designs suitable for imaging animals such as rats and mice, the number of rung elements is less than 10. Although the authors argued that the design could be extended to a larger number of elements, the statement is not supported with any kind of explanations or suggestions for such implementation. In fact, the prior arts designs are based on the use of lumped capacitor elements in construction. The physical size of the lumped element components limits the maximum possible number of elements to 10 or less in surface coils for small animals.
The millipede surface coil of this work has a coil structure with 100 or more rung elements. The elements are similar to those used in the millipede birdcage coil disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,189 and assigned to the assignee as the present invention. Since the coil has lots of elements or rungs, the magnetic field “hot spot” around the elements are minimized. As the result, millipede surface coils can be positioned very close to a sample to improve the filling factor and provide uniform detection sensitivity close to the sample surface. Also the distributed capacitor design of millipede surface coil helps to minimize the stray dielectric loss in the sample and to reduce the frequency shift due to the sample loading. According to an embodiment of the invention the coil can be operated in two modes, with the RF fields of the two modes being orthogonal, and can be driven in quadrature.
Means for independently tuning and matching the two modes of the millipede surface coil have been devised. Also an active detuning circuit has been devised using an inductor circuit with two pin diodes that operates in the off mode with zero bias voltage.
The millipede surface coil can take various shapes and coupling arrangements. The drawings are for the purpose of illustration and not to be construed as limiting the invention.
a illustrates the construction of a millipede surface coil according to the present work.
b illustrates an alternate construction of the millipede surface coil.
a illustrates the electrical current profile of the m=1 resonant mode of the millipede surface coil.
b illustrates the voltage profile of the m=1 resonant mode of the millipede surface coil.
a illustrates the electrical current profile of the m=2 resonant mode of the millipede surface coil.
b illustrates the voltage profile of the m=2 resonant mode of the millipede surface coil.
The RF coil used for transmitting radio frequency fields to the object or animal and/or detecting the responding RF fields from the object form the subject of this invention. The subject work is directed particularly toward coils that can be effectively used for small animals such as mice or rats, or small samples of material. To obtain the highest sensitivity the coil should be placed as close as possible to the region of the object being imaged. This might be, for example, the brain of a mouse or rat, or a small region near the surface of a larger animal or object.
a shows a millipede surface coil 10 illustrating one aspect of the invention. The millipede surface coil 10 of
An alternative embodiment of the millipede surface coil is illustrated in
No capacitors are added to the coil circuit illustrated in
The coils can be made from flexible or rigid circuit printed circuit board material. The coil pattern is formed by standard etching methods. The preferred dielectric substrate material has low RF loss and low proton background, for example TEFLON®.
The ladder coil structure will resonate when the electrical length of the ladder structure is such that a wave propagating from one end of the structure to the other end undergoes a phase shift of m π, where m is an integer. The lowest resonant frequency occurs with m=1. When this resonance occurs the currents in the first and second conducting strips are in opposite directions as illustrated by arrows 22 and 23 of
The RF voltage under the m=1 resonant condition is sketched in
a illustrates the currents in the coil structure at the next to lowest resonant frequency. The frequency of this mode with m=2 is considerably higher than the lowest resonant frequency. At this resonance the currents in the first end strip are illustrated by arrows 32 and 33 and the currents in the second end strip by arrows 34 and 35. The vertical arrows in
b illustrates the voltage between the RF voltage between the first and second end strips as a function of position along the strip for the m=2 mode. The RF voltages are large and of the same phase at the two end rungs and also large but of opposite phase at the center of the rung structure.
With a flexible dielectric sheet, the millipede surface coil as described above can be fit to the surface topology of an animal or region of the object being imaged, thereby providing a higher filling factor and greater sensitivity. If the surface of the region to be imaged is planar, a planar coil fixed to a rigid dielectric sheet can be applied directly to the surface region. In other applications it may be desirable to fix the coil to rigid dielectric sheet of some other shape to better match the surface contour of the object being studied.
For many small animal applications a cylindrical shape approximates the surface of the region to be imaged. In this application the millipede surface coil as described above may be supported on a rigid dielectric cylinder that closely conforms to the shape of the region of the object to be imaged as illustrated in
The tuning of the m=1 made can be achieved by opening a gap at the center of the first conducting end strip and inserting a variable capacitor, C1, as illustrated in
The tuning of the m=2 mode can be achieved by adding a variable capacitor C2 between the first conducting end strip and middle rung element connected to the second conducting end strip as illustrated in
One method of coupling and matching to the modes of the coil to the transmission lines leading to the MRI control and display unit is illustrated in
The m=1 mode detuning is achieved by effectively switching coil L1 across the series capacitor combination of C1′ and C1″. This achieved by applying a positive bias voltage on V1 relative to terminal V1′ of
During the receive phase the active RF switches for the two modes must be completely off. In the circuit of
Although the designs of the millipede surface coil has been described with reference to particular embodiments and examples, other modification, variations and additions will occur to those skilled in the art in view of the above teachings. For example if the pin diodes were reversed in polarity and the bias supply voltage was also be reversed, the circuit would operate equally well. It should be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4881034 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5559434 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5898306 | Liu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6169401 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6285189 | Wong et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6396271 | Burl et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6661229 | Weyers et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6781377 | Marek | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6870453 | Schulz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6958607 | Vaughan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7023209 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7088104 | Bottomley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7427861 | Bogdanov et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7501823 | Nistler et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501828 | Wong et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7508210 | Morich et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8022705 | Bogdanov | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20070035303 | Gleich et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080278167 | Vaughan, Jr. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090079432 | Pinkerton et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1386175 | Jul 2009 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110001479 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |