This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Patent Application No. PCT/KR2011/007493, filed Oct. 10, 2011, which claims priority to Korean Application No. 10-2011-0000622, filed Jan. 4, 2011, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates to an antenna adopted for a small terminal, and more particularly, to a multi input multi output (MIMO) antenna with no phase change having a miniaturized size and improved gain and efficiency.
Referring to
The related art monopole antenna is designed on the basis of a selective ground by printing an antenna form on a dielectric substrate, various antenna characteristics are very sensitive to a change of the ground. Moreover, an entire size of the antenna is fixed with a predetermined area (for example, about 35×38 mm2), so that it is difficult to reduce the entire size and apply the antenna to a small device.
In one embodiment, a MIMO antenna having no phase change constituting one antenna structure overall, wherein unit structures at both sides are symmetrical to each other in a meander form with respect to the center; the unit structures having the meander form are connected to a ground plate by using as a medium power feeding units 240 and 250 supplying an electric energy to the respective unit structures; and the unit structures are installed with a three-dimensional structure, being adjacent to the ground plate.
Embodiments provide a multi input multi output (MIMO) antenna with no phase change, in which its size is miniaturized by using an infinite wavelength metamaterial with no phase change and its gain and efficiency are improved by forming a decoupling structure at the center of a dipole antenna structure to suppress a mutual interference between antennas.
Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Here, the meander form of the unit structures 210 and 220 may have a ‘’-shape.
The unit structures 210 and 220 may have the ‘’-shape but may be formed with a three-dimensional structure, which is symmetric with respect to the center. That is, the ‘
’-shape of the unit structures 210 and 220 may be seen as a ‘
’-shape if seen from the top and the side.
Additionally, a decoupling structure 230 having a ‘U’ shape for suppressing a mutual interference between the unit structures 210 and 220 (i.e., antennas) at the both sides of the center is used to physically connect the unit structures 210 and 220.
Additionally, a line width of the unit structures 210 and 220 may be about 0.6 mm to about 1.0 mm and a length of the unit structures 210 and 220 as a single antenna may be about 45 mm to about 50 mm. Here, the line width of the unit structures 210 and 220 constituting the antenna may be about 0.8 mm and the length of the unit structures 210 and 220 as a single antenna may be about 47.8 mm. Here, numeral limitations (e.g., ranges and specific values) about the width and length of the antenna are based on the results obtained through simulations about a range or a value with which an entire size of an antenna is miniaturized and its performance is maximized.
Additionally, an interval d between the line widths of the unit structures 210 and 220 constituting the antenna may be designed with about 2 mm and a height h of the antenna may be designed with about 3 mm. Here, the numeral limitations about the interval d and the height H are based on the result obtained through simulations about a range or a value with which an entire size of an antenna is miniaturized and its performance is maximized.
Additionally, a size of a single antenna of the unit structures 210 and 220 constituting the antenna may be designed with about 9×7 mm2, a size of the decoupling structure 230 having a U shape may be designed with about 3×7 mm2, and an entire size of the antenna including the decoupling structure 230 may be designed with about 21×7 mm2.
Here, the numeral limitations about the size of the single antenna, the size of the decoupling structure 230, and the entire size of the antenna are based on the results obtained through simulations about a range or a value with which an entire size of an antenna is miniaturized and its performance is maximized.
Hereinafter, the MINO antenna with no phase change according to an embodiment will be described further.
The present invention may provide a miniaturized antenna, in which its size is miniaturized by using an infinite wavelength metamaterial with no phase change through a line modification (for example, the above-mentioned meander structure) unlike a related art antenna having a λ/4 resonance. Additionally, the present invention may control a mutual interference between antennas by disposing the decoupling structure 230 between the unit structures 210 and 220 to connect them.
In a typical transmission line, a wave number (the number of waves in a unit length, which is identical to a reciprocal number of the waves) has a positive value increased linearly. However, in a case of composite right-left handed (CRLH) having a metamaterial structure property, the wave number is nonlinearly increased. Because of this characteristic, a region is divided into a left-handed (LH) region and a right-handed (RH) region and then is described.
According to LH wave characteristics, the slope of a wave number has a positive value and the wave number has a negative value in a specific frequency band. If the wave number is 0 or a negative value, a resonance point occurs in an LH region. Especially, if the wave number is 0 in a specific frequency band, a wavelength becomes infinite so that an antenna is micronized regardless of a structural resonance length.
As shown in
Additionally, a series resonance Wse occurs through the series inductance LR and the series capacitance CL and a parallel resonance Wsh occurs through the parallel capacitance CR and the parallel inductance LL. If their frequencies are different from each other, an unbalanced bandgap is formed to show a cut-off characteristic. If their frequencies are the same, a balanced bandgap is formed.
A phase velocity of an entire electric energy (for example, a current) flowing through the CRLH transmission line is obtained by the sum of a phase velocity component in the RH region and a phase velocity component in the LH region. If the entire phase velocity is 0, metamaterial characteristics having no phase change occurs. If the phase velocity is 0, since a wavelength becomes infinite, an entire transmission line becomes inphase overall. Accordingly, regardless of a physical length of the transmission line (i.e., an antenna), electric and magnetic fields having the same size and direction are formed. This makes components miniaturized through a miniaturized antenna.
In a case of a double negative (DNG) transmission line (i.e., an antenna), when a series capacitance and a parallel inductance are introduced and effective permeability or effective permittivity is 0, a zeroth order resonance (ZOR) mode may be obtained. In a case of an epsilon-negative (ENG) transmission line (i.e., an antenna), when only a parallel inductance is introduced and effective permittivity is 0, a ZOR mode is obtained. That is, when a ZOR antenna is realized, the ENG transmission line (i.e., an antenna) is simpler than the DNG transmission line (i.e., an antenna).
Meanwhile, according to an embodiment, in order to obtain the metamaterial resonator characteristic of
In relation to the MIMO antenna having no phase change according to an embodiment, the metamaterial characteristics will be confirmed through current flow. Due to characteristics of a typical antenna, an electric field vector is changed by about 180 in a half-wave resonant portion. Accordingly, current flows in an opposite direction. In a case of the metamaterial antenna having no phase change, since an electric field vector is formed throughout the antenna in the same direction, current flows in a single direction.
As shown in
Here, a characteristic difference between an antenna of the present invention and a typical monopole antenna will be described with reference to
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
Additionally, a current flowing through the decoupling structure 230 is accumulated on a single antenna, so that there is less interference between two antennas (i.e., unit structures). Accordingly, compared to when there is no decoupling structure, gain and efficiency of the antenna is further improved.
As mentioned able, the line width of the antenna is about 0.8 mm and the length of a single antenna is about 47.8 mm. Additionally, an interval D between antenna lines is about 2 mm and the height h of the antenna is about 3 mm. The size of the single antenna using the above line with a no phase change metamaterial structure is about 9×7 mm2 and an entire size including the decoupling structure 230 is about 21×7 mm2. Through this, it is confirmed that the size (e.g., about 21×7 mm2) of the antenna according to an embodiment is much smaller than that (e.g., about 35×38 mm2) of a typical antennal.
Moreover,
Referring to
When examining the isolation characteristic, an interference between antennas is less.
Referring to
According to an embodiment, provided is a MIMO antenna with no phase change, in which its size is miniaturized by using an infinite wavelength metamaterial with no phase change and its gain and efficiency are improved by forming a decoupling structure at the center of a dipole antenna structure to suppress a mutual interference between antennas.
Although embodiments have been described with reference to a number of illustrative embodiments thereof, it should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art that will fall within the spirit and scope of the principles of this disclosure. More particularly, various variations and modifications are possible in the component parts and/or arrangements of the subject combination arrangement within the scope of the disclosure, the drawings and the appended claims. In addition to variations and modifications in the component parts and/or arrangements, alternative uses will also be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/KR2011/007493 | 10/10/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/093766 | 7/12/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6339404 | Johnson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6839040 | Huber | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6967631 | Park | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7358906 | Sato et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20040001023 | Peng | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070046543 | Choi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080074341 | Chung | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080246685 | Ying | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090027278 | Soora | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100171676 | Tani | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100295739 | Wu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110115687 | Huang | May 2011 | A1 |
20120013519 | Hakansson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-2005-0107881 | Nov 2005 | KR |
10-0737588 | Jul 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0008687 | Jan 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0124252 | Dec 2009 | KR |
984109 | Sep 2010 | KR |
Entry |
---|
The ARRL Antenna Book, Published by The American Radio Relay League. Gerald Hall. |
The American Radio Relay League, by Gerald Hall. |
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/KR2011/007493, filed Oct. 10, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140055319 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |