This invention relates to the field of land mines and in particular to devices and techniques for excavating mines.
Land mines can be buried or surface laid. A surface laid mine does not present a major problem to an Explosives Ordnance Disposal (EOD) technician since it can be attacked and neutralised from a safe stand-off distance, e.g. by means of a projectile, pyrotechnic torch or other suitable means. Buried mines, however, present more of a problem.
Anti-personnel mines are generally fairly close to the surface but anti-tank mines can be up to 300 mm from the surface. Current techniques for neutralising buried mines include mechanical excavation or shaped charge attack.
Mechanical excavators simply dig mines out of the ground ready for subsequent disposal or attack. Such systems are vulnerable to blast damage in the event of an inadvertent explosion.
Shaped charge attack neutralisation techniques aim to initiate mines by imparting energy into the explosive component of the mine. If no reaction occurs then the EOD technician does not know whether a non-mine target has been attacked in error, the mine has been missed or insufficient energy has been imparted to the explosive contents of the mine.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of mine neutralisation/retrieval (and device therefor) that substantially mitigates or overcomes the above mentioned problems.
Accordingly the invention provides a method of excavating a buried mine comprising the steps of:
Correspondingly the invention provides a mine excavation device comprising an explosively tipped projectile, detonation means for detonating the explosively tipped projectile and propelling means arranged in use to be capable of propelling the projectile into the ground and into proximity with a mine to be retrieved wherein the explosively tipped projectile is arranged such that in use detonation of the explosive causes the mine to be excavated from the ground
The invention comprises the use of a small explosive charge to excavate the mine from the ground. A small explosive charge (in the region of 50-250 g of a suitable explosive, such as PE4, a commercially available explosive) is placed into proximity of the mine to be excavated) for example, the charge is placed beneath and slightly to one side of the mine). Upon detonation of the small explosive charge the mine is flipped out of the ground along a radial line that bisects the mine and the explosive charge (Note: many modern mines are blast hardened/resistant and so the detonation of a small amount of low explosive nearby is unlikely to activate the mine). Once the mine is on the surface it can be more easily neutralised by an EOD technician by conventional means as described above.
Conveniently, if the mine is buried in sandy soil a net can be placed over the mine in order to catch the mine after detonation of the small explosive charge. The use of a net in this way assists location of the mine after it has been removed from the surface.
The excavating charge can be placed in a number of ways. Conveniently, a simple boring tool can be used so that the charge can be placed manually. Alternative ways of placing the charge include:
If a gun/projectile delivery method is used then the projectile can conveniently include arrestor arms that deploy in flight and which stop the projectile when it has reached the correct mine excavating depth.
If a hydraulic arm is used then conveniently a disposable spacing element can be used to space the charge from the hydraulic mechanism in order to protect the hydraulics in the event of inadvertent mine activation. Furthermore, a crumple zone could also conveniently be incorporated into the hydraulic arm to protect against high shock loads.
An excavating charge has a large effective area of ground coverage (approximately 1.2 m in diameter) and so this invention is particularly useful when the detection location accuracy and depth of the buried mine is approximate.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein
In
In
In tests between 50 g and 250 g of PE4 explosive was placed beneath the mine and depending on the relative position of the charge and mine and the soil conditions, the mine was flipped out in a radial direction bisecting the centre of the mine and the underground charge a distance of between 0.5 and 70 metres.
In use the mine retrieval device is “injected” by the hydraulic system until the explosive carried upon member 12 is beneath and to one side of the mine 20 to be retrieved. The mine 20 will generally have a blast zone 22 as depicted. The stand-off provided by the spacing tube 16 and hydraulic arm 14 and the angle of delivery, therefore increases the blast protection of the total system.
Once the device has been placed beneath the mine the hydraulic arm is retracted (and subsequently reloaded with another explosively tipped member 12) and the explosive is initiated. The mine will be flipped out of the ground for subsequent disposal.
In
In use the device is placed in the general location of a mine 32. Upon detonation of an explosive sheet (not shown) the projectile is forced into the ground. The explosive tip 30 is detonated by a delayed action fuze system (not shown) once full penetration has occurred. This allows the blast to act under the base of the mine 32, excavating it from the ground (in the direction indicated by arrow 34).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0103844 | Feb 2001 | GB | national |
This application is the US national phase of international application PCT/GB02/00485 filed 4 Feb. 2002, which designated the US.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTGB02/00485 | 2/4/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0206691 | 8/29/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2806442 | Temple | Sep 1957 | A |
3111927 | Temple et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3326172 | Kish | Jun 1967 | A |
3844244 | White | Oct 1974 | A |
4128071 | Layman et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
5448936 | Turner | Sep 1995 | A |
5661258 | Garcia et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5771833 | Hasse | Jun 1998 | A |
5988038 | Feintuch | Nov 1999 | A |
6032567 | Jones et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6546838 | Zavitsanos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6679176 | Zavitsanos et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20020096039 | Anderson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 44 415 | Apr 2001 | DE |
0 916 921 | May 1999 | EP |
2 757 622 | Jun 1998 | FR |
2 321 880 | Aug 1998 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040069133 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |