This invention relates to mine stoppings and to braces for such mine stoppings.
Mine stoppings are widely used in mine passageways to stop off the flow of air therethrough. A conventional metal stopping shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,483,642 comprises a plurality of elongate extensible panels 7 extending vertically from the floor to the roof of the mine passageway and positioned in side-by-side relation across the passageway. (See
Some mine passages can be quite large, e.g., 20 feet wide and 10 feet high and even as large as 60 feet wide and 35 feet high. Further, the pressure differential across a stopping can be very high. The high pressure differential and/or the large size of the mine passages that a stopping closes can subject the stopping to large forces which cause the stopping to bend or deflect. Satisfactory high pressure stoppings are disclosed in our co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/061,146 filed Feb. 1, 2002, and in our U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,084, filed Dec. 17, 1999, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is directed to improvements in stoppings and braces that are particularly advantageous for high pressure or large mine passageways.
Among the several objects of this invention may be noted the provision of an improved mine stopping and stopping braces capable of use in large or high pressure mine passageways; the provision of such stopping and braces that will be effective in at least partially stopping the flow of air through the mine passageway; the provision of such stopping and braces that are easy to install and maintain without excessive attention.
In one aspect, apparatus of this invention is a mine stopping installed in a mine passageway having a floor, a roof and opposing walls. The stopping comprises a plurality of elongate panels extending generally vertically in side-by-side relation from adjacent the floor to adjacent the roof of the passageway to at least partially close the passageway. An elongate brace extends generally horizontally between the side walls of the passageway adjacent to the panels. A generally vertical column extends from the floor to the roof and is adapted for reinforcing the brace.
In another aspect of the invention, the mine stopping comprises a stopping wall having a lower end adjacent the floor of the passageway and a generally horizontal anchor beam secured to the floor and positioned adjacent the lower end of the stopping wall for inhibiting movement of the panels under a transverse load applied to the stopping.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, the mine stopping comprises a stopping wall having an upper end adjacent the roof and a generally horizontal anchor beam secured to the roof and positioned adjacent the upper end of the stopping wall for inhibiting movement of the panels under a transverse load applied to the stopping.
In still another aspect, a brace of the invention is adapted for reinforcing a mine stopping system against deflection when the system is under load. The brace comprises a chord having opposite ends adapted to be secured to respective side walls of the passageway adjacent the stopping. At least one structural member has at least one end secured to the chord and adapted to extend generally outwardly away from the stopping when the brace is installed adjacent the stopping. A support is connected to the at least one structural member and has an end adapted to engage the floor or the roof of the mine passageway for supporting the brace.
In another aspect, a brace for extending between opposite side walls of the mine passageway comprises a central beam and at least one slide member connected to the central beam. The slide member is adapted for extensible movement relative to the central beam whereby the brace has a variable length. The central beam is I-beam shaped and the at least one slide member is channel shaped for mating engagement with the central beam.
Another brace of the invention comprises a central beam, at least one slide member slidably connected to the central beam to provide relative movement therebetween whereby the brace has a variable length. At least one securement member is fixed to the central beam and adapted for connection to the stopping wall. The securement member includes an extensible member slidably connected to the securement member to provide relative movement therebetween. A coupling connects the slide member and the extensible member.
Other objects and features of the present invention will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Referring to
The stopping system 1 of this embodiment includes a plurality of stopping panels 18 positioned in side-by-side relation and extending vertically in the mine passageway 3 generally between the side walls 14, 15 to thereby form a stopping wall. The stopping panels 18 can be of any suitable style, e.g., each one can be fabricated as a single piece panel or multiple panels such as a pair of panel sections 19 (upper section) and 20 (lower section) which are preferably channel shaped (
When the panels 18 are installed in a mine, they are positioned in side-by-side relation and the upper section 19 is extended relative to the lower section 20 so that the panel extends from the floor 16 to the roof 12. Each panel is forced into engagement with the roof 12 and the lower tier panels by use of a jack (not shown), such as by the jacks shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. Re. 32,675 and 4,695,035, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The panels 18 are suitably secured in position in the mine passageway 3 in side-by-side relation. Such securement can be by any suitable securement members and helps inhibit substantial relative movement between adjacent side-by side panels 18. As shown in
Referring now to
Each chord 31 has opposite first and second ends 31a, 31b and a longitudinal axis L. The chord 31 comprises at least one central support member or central beam 37. There may be more than one central beam 37 within the scope of this invention. Length adjustment or variation is provided by having at least one slide member 41 (generally, an extensible or telescoping portion) mounted on the central beam 37 for telescoping movement relative to the central beam. In this exemplary embodiment, the central beam 37 is tubular having a rectangular transverse cross section with inside dimensions (See FIG. 4). The slide member 41 has a corresponding rectangular transverse cross section with outside dimensions slightly smaller than the inside dimensions of the central beam 37 and is slidably received therein for telescoping movement. The central beam 37 may be sized smaller in cross section than the slide members 41 so that the central beam is received in ends of the slide members. It is to be understood that the cross sectional shape of the central beam 37 can vary, e.g., it may have an I-beam shape, as shown and described below with respect to FIG. 6. The shape of the slide member 41 preferably corresponds to the central beam 37, but may differ therefrom within the scope of this invention. Preferably a slide member 41 is mounted in each of two opposite ends 37a, 37b of the central beam 37 permitting length adjustment or variation of the chord 31 at both ends of the central beam 37. The illustrated embodiment shows the use of two slide members 41 in a central beam 37; however, only one slide member may be used within the scope of this invention. The length of the slide members 41 should be such that they will accommodate the maximum amount of mine wall divergence without disengaging from the central beam 37. During cycles of mine wall convergence and divergence, the central beam 37 could work completely to one side of the mine passageway. Thus, the slide member 41 on the opposite end (37a or 37b) of the central beam 37 is preferably long enough to prevent disengagement from the central beam. Additionally, sufficient lengths of the slide members 41 are preferably disposed in the central beam 37 to provide the necessary strength for the brace 35 to support the anticipated loads on the brace.
The brace 35 preferably includes anchor means 38 at opposite ends 31a, 31b of the chord 31 for mounting or securing the brace 35 to the mine wall. The anchor means 38 is operable to retain the brace 35 in position relative to the side walls 14, 15 when the walls converge and diverge causing load to be applied to the stopping 1. The anchor means 38 is affixed to the exteriorly positioned free ends 31a, 31b of the chord in a manner that will allow tension and compression to be applied to the slide members 41 from the side walls 14, 15. The anchor means 38 is preferably operable to allow for or effect both expansion and contraction of the length of the brace 35 and maintain the brace secured to the mine walls. The anchor means 38 is secured to a mine wall to prevent movement of the brace 35 relative to or along the mine passageway 3. In one embodiment, the anchor means 38 includes a plate 45 connected or secured to the exteriorly positioned free end of each of the slide members 41. The plate 45 lies in a plane that is generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis L of the central beam 37 and that of the respective slide member 41. As shown in
Retaining means is also provided to restrict telescoping movement of the slide members 41 in the central beam 37. As shown, the retaining means preferably comprises friction lock means including, in one embodiment, T-handled set screws 49 that are threadably mounted in the central support member 37. When the set screws 49 are tightened, they engage respective slide members 41 and frictionally retain the slide members in their initial adjusted position or a subsequent position due to wall movement. The friction between the set screws 49 and the slide members 41 resists relative telescoping of the central beam 37 and slide members so that the chord 31 is configured to have substantial columnar strength for bearing a substantial longitudinal load (i.e., axial or eccentric loading relative to the longitudinal axis L) applied to the chord. Thus, the brace 35 is sufficiently unyielding so as to provide substantial support to the side walls 14, 15. Substantial convergence or divergence of the side walls 14, 15 overcomes the frictional force causing telescoping movement of the slide members 41 relative to the central beam 37, as described more fully in application Ser. No. 10/061,146. The slide member 41 is locked relative to the central beam 37 such that the slide member will resist a substantial longitudinal load without yielding or sliding relative to the central beam.
The brace 35 in the embodiment of
The braces 35 are secured to the stopping panels 18 on the normally low pressure side 9 of the stopping system 1 to reduce bending or deformation of the stopping system. Such mounting and loading places the struts 32 in tension. The generally V-shape of the brace 35 results in a smaller quantity of material being needed to provide the required strength. Also, the general V-shape of the brace 35 results in the brace having a higher or larger moment of inertia at the center of the brace than at its opposite ends. Further, in the V-shape form of brace 35, the moment of inertia continuously increases from adjacent each end of the brace toward the central area of the brace 35 where it is at a maximum.
The struts 32 can be made from a flat metal strap and, when the brace 35 is in use, normal loading thereof will put the struts 32 in tension allowing for the use of a simple transverse cross section. Note that if other than normal loading is expected, e.g., loading which may subject the struts 32 to compression, the struts should be made of a different material such as rectangular tubing. When the brace 35 is loaded due to the pressure differential across the stopping 1, the loading force is directed from a front side 67 of the central beam 37 toward the respective ends 54, 56, 57 placing the strut 32 in tension and the king post 52 in compression. If the pressure differential is reversed so that the force is directed from the opposite side 68 of the central beam 37, the strut 32 resists compression loading.
Referring to
Referring to
In another embodiment shown in
Though the supports 70, 80 are shown attached generally at the junction of the struts 32 and the web 33, the support may be attached anywhere along the struts or the web. The brace 35 may also include more than one support and/or more than one type of support. As described below, support 80 may also reduce the bending moment on the brace as described below.
An alternative brace 95 is shown in
Referring to
Referring to
A method of installing a stopping according to the invention will be described with reference to
In a preferred method, each panel 18 of the upper tier 140 is forced into engagement with the roof 12 and the panels of the lower tier 139 by use of a jack (not shown), such as the jacks shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. Re. 32,675 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,695,035, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. In this embodiment, the head of the jack engages the head or upper end 19b of one of the upper panel members of the upper tier 140 and a base of the jack engages the foot or lower end 20a of the lower panel member 20 of the same panel 18. The jack is then actuated so that the lower end 20a of the panel member “bites” into the upper end 19bof at least one adjacent panel 18 of the lower tier 139. This jacking operation will also simultaneously force the lower end 20a of an adjacent panel 18 of the lower tier 139 into the floor 16. Optionally, prior to jacking the panels 18 of the upper tier 140, the jack may be extended from floor 16 to roof 12 so that the head of the jack is positioned to engage the upper end 19b of one of the panels 18 of the upper tier 140 and the base of the jack is positioned to engage the lower end 20a of an adjacent panel 18 of the lower tier 139 directly beneath the upper tier panel. The jack is then actuated to force the upper and lower ends 19b, 20a into engagement with the roof 12 and the floor 16, respectively. Also, the jack may further be used to jack the upper end 19b of one of the panels 18 of the lower tier 139 into the lower end 20a of an adjacent panel 18 of the upper tier 140 directly above the lower tier panel. After the jacking operation is completed, the lower ends 20a of the panels 18 of the upper tier 140 are secured to the upper angle 62 of the brace 135 by twist wires 30. As shown in
In an embodiment shown in
Referring to
In the panel 18″ of
The panels 18′, 18″ are advantageously used in any of the stoppings shown herein and in any combination with each other or other types of panels. The panels 18′, 18″ may also be used in a stopping which does not have the braces shown herein. For example in
Vertical column 251 may be fastened or connected to the brace 135, as shown for example in
The bending moment force on the brace 135 varies in magnitude along the length of the brace. If one vertical column 251 is used, the column is preferably disposed at a position along the length of the brace 135 where the bending moment magnitude is greatest. Typically, this position is approximately the center of the brace 135 (the point of extreme fiber stress, as described below, assuming the load is uniform across the stopping), but the position may vary, e.g., due to obstructions or turns in the passageway. As described below in the Bending Moment Examples, the air load capacity of the stopping may be effectively quadrupled by installation of one vertical column 251. Preferably, the column is constructed so that it will not inelastically yield under a bending moment caused by an air pressure differential of at least about 2 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 5 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 10 inches water gauge, and even more preferably at least about 20 inches water gauge. The differential may be caused by static (fan) pressure or dynamic pressure such as from blasting or ground or equipment movements. Additional generally vertical columns may be included, especially for extremely wide passages to further reduce the bending moment on the brace and increase the air load capacity of the stopping. For example, as shown in
The braces and columns of this invention have substantial bending strength for bearing a substantial transverse load applied to the beam generally transversely of the beam. Such load is typically applied by the air pressure differential acting against the mine stopping system and transferred to the brace and columns. Preferably, as an example where one brace and one column is used, the brace and column are sized for an exemplary sized stopping system having a width of 20 feet and a height of 15 feet so that the brace and column do not inelastically yield under a transverse load caused by a pressure differential of at least about 2 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 5 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 10 inches water gauge, and even more preferably at least about 20 inches water gauge. For another exemplary sized stopping system having a width of 40 feet and a height of 30 feet, the brace and column are sized so that it does not inelastically yield under a transverse load caused by a pressure differential of at least about 2 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 5 inches water gauge, more preferably at least about 10 inches water gauge, and even more preferably at least about 20 inches water gauge. Note that the brace, the column, and each panel of the stopping will be stressed due to the air pressure differential and will deflect a distance due to the air pressure differential (the transverse load). Preferably, the respective stiffness of each brace, column and panel are selected so that each brace, column and panel are similarly stressed when the stopping system is placed under the transverse load. More specifically, the point of extreme fiber stress in, for example, the brace generally occurs midway across the passageway, and such extreme fiber stress is substantially similar to extreme fiber stress in the panels and column that are positioned midway across the passageway. The point of extreme fiber stress in the panels and column (at least for a single tier stopping) is likely to be adjacent the point of extreme fiber stress in the brace. In a two-tier stopping, the point of extreme fiber stress in each panel will likely be about midway up each tier; and if two braces are used, the point is likely about midway between the braces. Extreme fiber stress is local stress through a small area (a point or a line) furthest from the neutral axis or centroid on the brace or the panels, and is typically measured in pounds per square inch (psi). More specifically, for panels positioned generally midway across the passageway, extreme fiber stress in the panels is at least about 40 percent, more preferably about 60 percent, even more preferably about 80 percent, of the extreme fiber stress in the brace and the column when the transverse load is applied to the stopping so that the beam, the column and the panels are effective to resist the transverse load. In another example, if the brace has an extreme fiber stress of 10,000 psi due to the transverse load, then the extreme fiber stress in the adjacent panels is at least about 4000 psi, more preferably at least about 6000 psi, and even more preferably at least about 8000 psi. Also note that the brace, the column and the panels will deflect similar distances under similar loads. By stressing the brace, the column and the panels similarly, overstressing one or the other beyond their respective yield points is inhibited. Moreover, material used in the brace, column and panels is not wasted as would be the case if only one of the brace, column and panel was significantly stressed by the transverse load. For example, if the brace did not carry a significant portion of the transverse load, then the material therein would be wasted with respect to resisting the transverse load. Note that the stopping may be comprised of materials other than panels, e.g., masonry blocks.
Referring to
As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the stopping systems are constructed of metal, e.g., steel.
The braces disclosed herein may be used to reinforce an existing stopping, i.e., a stopping where the stopping panels are already in position when the brace is installed. However, because the braces are much more readily sized to fit the passageway, installation of the reinforced stopping system is generally quicker and easier than the prior art method of erecting a stopping. The braces and the described methods of installation, may also be used in combination with a pre-assembled stopping or pre-assembled stopping sections, as shown in our co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/903,429 filed Jul. 11, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The embodiments of the invention disclosed above are illustrative. Many variations of the mine stoppings, braces and other structures are possible without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, suitable braces may or may not include reinforcing frames, trusses or structural members such as the struts 32 and web 33 described above. Such structural members for the brace may have shapes other than the general V-shape shown in FIG. 10. The cross sectional shapes of the components of the brace can also be different. For example, the strut 32 could be an angle member and the chord 31 and slide members 41 could be round.
Preferred braces of this invention will accommodate convergence and divergence of the mine and still be effective in supporting the stopping panels 18 against deflection from a pressure differential, and in supporting the mine walls 14, 15. The structure of the braces allows them to self adjust to accommodate mine convergence and divergence while continuously supporting the walls to inhibit cracking and sloughing off. Such support reduces maintenance and operation costs. By having variable length, the braces can be used in mine passages of various widths, thereby increasing the versatility of application and decreasing the number of different braces needed in inventory. The braces may further provide a simple means of joining together two tiers of stopping panels 18 stacked one on top of the other, while also providing resistance to deflection of the stopping system due to different pressures on opposite sides of the system.
Note that the slide members 41 need not telescope relative to the central beam 37. It is also contemplated that the braces of the various embodiments of this invention may be non-extensible, i.e., the slide members may be omitted and the brace sized to fit a passageway of a known width.
As described in these Examples, installation of a brace halfway up the panel's height effectively quadruples the air load capacity of the stopping. Similarly, installation of a vertical column halfway along the stopping length effectively quadruples the air load capacity of the stopping.
The bending moment formula (beam formula) for simply supported (i.e., supports are positioned at opposite ends of the beams) and uniformly loaded beams is M=WL/8, where the weight (W) on the beam (in pounds) times the length (L) of the beam (in inches) divided by 8 gives the bending moment (M, also referred to as torque) on the beam in inch pounds. A required section modulus of the beam is determined by the beam stress formula, S=M/Fb, where Fb is extreme fiber stress in bending. Fb is typically 21,600 psi for ordinary structural steel, which is 60% (for a 1.67 factor of safety) of the material's yield strength of 60,000 Psi. If the required section modulus is known, the beam size can be selected. Any beam having at least the required section modulus should support the load without being overstressed.
An example beam is 120 inches long and simply supports a uniform load of 330 pounds. The bending moment on the beam is: (120×330)/8=4950 inch pounds. The required section modulus is 4950/21600=0.2292 in3. Any beam having a section modulus of at least 0.2292 in3 is sufficient.
In the above example, the beam length is 120 inches. The square law states that if the length is doubled, the allowable load per foot on the beam in pounds per linear foot would be reduced by a factor of four. To test the square law in a second example, the 120 inch length of the first example is changed to 240 inches, and the load is halved from 330 pounds (33 pounds per foot) to 165 pounds (8.25 pounds per foot). According to the square law, the bending moment should be the same, i.e., 4950 inch pounds. Using the numbers of the second example, the square law is proven as follows: WL/8=(165×240)/8=4950 inch pounds.
Another way to prove the square law is to examine a given beam or stopping panel. In this third example, the beam is a standard 1 foot wide by 10 feet long stopping panel subjected to an air load. The above examples indicate that one could quadruple the air pressure on the panel (without causing failure) if one cut the panel's length in half. From the above examples, if the panel has a section modulus of 0.2292 in3, then the panel is fully stressed (but not over stressed) under a uniform 330 pound air load. This air load on the panel would be caused by a typical mine ventilating air pressure of 6.346 inches water gauge. The panel should be similarly stressed, i.e., the panel should experience a similar 21,600 psi extreme fiber stress, if the length of the panel (beam) is reduced to 5 feet and air pressure is increased to 25.384 inches water gauge. The square law is tested in this example as follows: the total load on the panel is 25.384×5.2×5=660 pounds (the factor 5.2 converts inches water gauge to pounds per square foot) and the bending moment is WL/8=(660×60)/8=4950 inch pounds. Because the section modulus did not change, the stress should be the same, which is proved as follows: Fb=4950/0.2292=21600 psi. Therefore, if one cuts the height of a stopping panel in half (as by the installation of a brace or truss or the like halfway along the panel's length), the air load capacity of the stopping is quadrupled. Similarly, if one cuts the length of the stopping in half (as by installation of a vertical column halfway along the stopping length, as described above), the air load capacity of the stopping is quadrupled.
Although not as common as the beam formula above, another way of examining the problem is to consider the load or weight value in the formula as weight units per unit length, in this case pounds per inch. The formula would therefore include the square factor, i.e., (W2L)/8 instead of the more familiar WL/8.
When introducing elements of the present invention or the preferred embodiment(s) thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
This application claims priority from U.S. Patent Application No. 60/353,243 (provisional), filed Feb. 1, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
251698 | Coats et al. | Jan 1882 | A |
617163 | Jacobs | Jan 1899 | A |
891897 | Astrom | Jun 1908 | A |
1478303 | Snyder | Dec 1923 | A |
1594921 | Barnett | Aug 1926 | A |
2350113 | Hurley | May 1944 | A |
2729064 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
3186177 | Kannenberg | Jun 1965 | A |
3851856 | Berg | Dec 1974 | A |
3937026 | Krings | Feb 1976 | A |
3969852 | Krings | Jul 1976 | A |
3972272 | Bagby | Aug 1976 | A |
4054033 | Pillosio | Oct 1977 | A |
4345857 | Krings | Aug 1982 | A |
4397224 | Walker | Aug 1983 | A |
4483642 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4547094 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4685837 | Cicanese | Aug 1987 | A |
4695035 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
RE32675 | Kennedy et al. | May 1988 | E |
RE32871 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 1989 | E |
4820081 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4911577 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5167474 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5215411 | Seegmiller | Jun 1993 | A |
5222838 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5813647 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
RE36853 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2000 | E |
6220785 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6379084 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6457906 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6682263 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
20020098046 | Kennedy et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2328552 | Apr 2002 | CA |
2610986 | Sep 1988 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030147706 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60353243 | Feb 2002 | US |