This invention relates to mineral insulated heating cables used, in heat tracing systems, and more particularly, to embodiments for mineral insulated cables that have a reduced sheath temperature.
Electrical heat tracing systems frequently utilize mineral insulated (MI) heating cables which function as auxiliary heat sources to compensate for heat losses encountered during normal operation of plants and equipment such as pipes, tanks, foundations, etc. Typical applications for such systems include freeze protection and process temperature maintenance.
MI cables are designed to operate as a series electrical heating circuit. When used in hazardous area locations, i.e. areas defined as potentially explosive by national and international standards such as NFPA 70 (The National Electrical Code), electrical heat tracing systems must comply with an additional operational constraint which requires that the maximum surface or sheath temperature of the heating cable does not exceed a local area auto-ignition temperature (AIT). Maximum sheath temperatures often occur in sections of the heat tracing system where the heating cable becomes spaced apart from the substrate surface (such as a pipe) and is no longer in direct contact with it, i.e. where the cable is no longer effectively heat sunk. Such sections are typically located where heating cables are routed over complex shapes of a heat tracing system. With respect to the heat tracing of pipes, this occurs in areas around flanges, valves and bends, for example, of a piping system.
Frequently, a heat tracing system designer is not able to utilize a single run or pass of cable for a particular installation since the higher wattage typically utilized in single runs may result in a maximum sheath temperature that exceeds the AIT. Instead, the designer will specify several lower-wattage cables operated in parallel so that the heat tracing system will operate at a low enough power density to ensure the cable sheath temperatures stay below the AIT. For example, if a piping system requires 20 watts/foot of heat tracing, the designer may have to specify two passes of 10 watt/foot cable instead of one pass of 20 watt/foot cable to keep the maximum sheath temperature of the heating cables below the AIT. In this example, the two-pass configuration will increase the cost of the installed heat tracing and can also result in configurations that are difficult to install when there is physically not enough room (such as on a small valve or pipe support) to place the multiple passes of heating cable. Thus, it would be desirable to operate a heating cable at increased power densities while reducing both the maximum sheath temperature to below the AIT and the number of passes of cable for a given application.
An approach is to use heat transfer compounds to reduce sheath temperature in electric heating cables. Heat transfer compounds have been used in the steam tracing industry to increase the heat transfer rate from steam tracers to piping. However, such compounds are only allowed in certain lower risk hazardous areas, require additional labor and material costs, and are difficult to install in non-straight sections of heat tracing, for example, around flanges, valves and bends where higher sheath temperatures are often found.
Another approach used for extreme high temperature applications in straight heating rods is to increase the surface emissivity of the heater. This increases the heater's performance by improving the efficiency of radiation heat transfer and allowing the heater to run cooler and last longer. The increase in emissivity occurs when the surface is oxidized. While increasing the emissivity can be used to decrease heating cable sheath temperatures, this approach is limited since it is most effective only at very high temperatures.
A further approach involves increasing the surface area of heating cables to improve radiation and convection heat transfer. Because of its larger surface area, a larger diameter MI cable will have a lower sheath temperature compared with a smaller diameter cable when both are operated at the same heat output (watts/foot). However, this approach increases the material costs and the stiffness of the cable.
Parallel circuit heating cables are desirable for their cut-to-length feature that is useful when installing field-run heat tracing. However, parallel heating cables employ a heating element spaced between two bus conductors and tend to be larger than their series counterparts. There are commercial non-polymeric parallel heating cables that are assembled by positioning a heating element, electrical insulation and bus conductors inside an oval-shaped flexible metal sheath or jacket. The jacket serves to house the heating element, electrical insulation and bus conductors and thus the jacket is part of the heating cable itself. In addition, the jacket protects the heating, insulating and conductor elements from impact and the environment. However, such parallel heating cables tend to be large and thus are rather stiff and their oval shape makes them difficult to bend especially in certain directions. They also have open ends and space within the cable that allows for moisture ingress that can cause electrical failure.
A mineral insulated heating cable for a heat tracing system is disclosed. The heating cable includes a sheath having at least a first, and optionally a second layer, wherein the thermal conductivity of the second layer is greater than a thermal conductivity of the first layer. In addition, the first and second layers are in intimate thermal contact. The heating cable also includes a least one heating conductor for generating heat and a dielectric layer located within the sheath for electrically insulating the heating conductor, wherein the sheath, heating conductor and dielectric layer form a heating section. In addition, the heating cable includes a conduit for receiving the heating section. Further, the heating cable includes a cold lead section and a hot cold joint for connecting the heating and cold lead sections. In addition, a high emissivity coating may be formed on the first layer. Further, at least one cooling fin may be attached to a heating section to reduce sheath temperature.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms “mounted,” “connected,” “supported,” and “coupled” and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass direct and indirect mountings, connections, supports, and couplings. Further, “connected” and “coupled” are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings. In the description below, like reference numerals and labels are used to describe the same, similar or corresponding parts in the several views of
In order to measure maximum sheath temperatures we have used the plate test described in IEEE 515-2011, Standard for the Testing, Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Electrical Resistance Heat Tracing for Industrial Applications. As part of a test set up (see
There are three different mechanisms by which heat loss occurs from a heating cable: radiation, conduction and convection. Maximum cable sheath temperatures can be reduced by modifying the heat tracing system to enhance its heat loss via any of these mechanisms used alone or in combination.
Referring to
In one aspect of the invention, a maximum temperature for the single layer sheath 24 (for example, occurring at one or more “hot spots”) is reduced by increasing the emissivity of the sheath surface to improve radiation heat transfer. A typical single layer cable sheath 24 made of Alloy 825 or stainless steel has an emissivity value from approximately 0.1 to 0.4. The emissivity value may be increased to approximately 0.6 or greater by applying a high emissivity coating 26 to the single layer sheath 24. This approach is most effective for cables that will be operating at high temperatures since radiated heat (loss) is proportional to T4 (K). In one example using a 0.25 in. outer diameter heating section 40, we found that coating a single layer sheath 24 with a high temperature coating such as Hie-Coat™ 840CM high emissivity coating supplied by Aremco Products Inc. decreased the maximum sheath temperature by approximately 29° C. when powered at 10 watts/foot with the temperature of the plate 12 maintained at approximately 150° C. Alternatively, an outer surface 28 of the single layer sheath 24 may be oxidized to form an oxidized layer 27 or the outer surface 28 may be subjected to a black anodizing process to form an anodized layer 29.
Referring to
The thermal conductivity of a typical sheath made of Alloy 825 is approximately 15 W·m−1·K−1. In the alternate embodiment, a portion of the sheath is fabricated from a material having a thermal conductivity greater than 20 W·m−1·K−1 to form an effective thermal conductivity of greater than 20 W·m−1·K−1 for the sheath. By way of example, a material such as copper (having a thermal conductivity of approximately 400 W·m−1·K−1) may be utilized in the sheath in addition to Alloy 825. Referring to
The maximum cable sheath temperature may be further reduced by combining the approaches described herein. An approach is to apply the high emissivity coating 26 to the outer layer 34 of the bilayer sheath 32 to increase the emissivity value to approximately 0.6 or greater. In one example using a 0.25 in. outer diameter heating section 40, we found that this combined approach decreased the maximum sheath temperature by approximately 45° C. when powered at 10 watts/foot with the temperature of the plate 12 set at approximately 150° C.
The bilayer sheath 32 may be formed by placing a copper inner tube inside an alloy 825 outer tube. A cold drawing and annealing process is then applied to both tubes simultaneously to produce a bilayer in intimate thermal contact. The sheath may then be coated with an adherent high emissivity material and/or oxidized.
Referring to
The maximum cable sheath temperature can also be reduced by increasing the cable surface area. This approach improves both radiative and convective heat losses. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In order to assemble the unit 72, the conduit 102 is slid over the end cap plug 84, end cap section 86, heating section 40 and the first joint section 76 until first conduit end 104 abuts against the first shoulder 80. In addition, the second end 101 of stud 90 is threadably engaged within hole 100 of the first conduit plug section 94. The first end 91 of stud 90 is then threaded within hole 88 of end cap plug 84 until a second conduit end 106 abuts against second shoulder 98 to form an integrated heating section and conduit unit which is sealed from environmental conditions.
Furthermore, cooling fins may also be used to reduce sheath temperature. For example, fins may be used in areas where a portion of a heating section 40 lifts off a pipe. Referring to
While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, permutations and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/931,863 filed on Jun. 29, 2013, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/668,305 filed on Jul. 5, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2767288 | Lennox | Oct 1956 | A |
2816200 | Mudge | Dec 1957 | A |
3214571 | Indoe | Oct 1965 | A |
3248813 | Quick | May 1966 | A |
3369209 | Edwin et al. | Feb 1968 | A |
3657513 | Howard | Apr 1972 | A |
4631392 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4704514 | Van Egmond et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4705106 | Hornack et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5974343 | Brevard | Oct 1999 | A |
20070193747 | de St. Remey et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237497 | Lehmann | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090189617 | Burns | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100089584 | Burns | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201550304 | Aug 2010 | CN |
0419351 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0419351 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1918941 | May 2008 | EP |
2224189 | Apr 1990 | GB |
20090017369 | Feb 2009 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190021138 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61668305 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13931863 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 16128344 | US |