The invention relates generally to atomizing nozzles and devices that dispense treatment fluids in a misted or dispersed, small particle size, form. Certain devices constructed described herein are particularly suitable for use in devices adapted for insertion through small-bore conduits to apply misted fluid onto interior portions of a human patient.
Details of the principles of operation and construction of certain operable atomizing nozzles are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,698,429, titled “MEDICAL ATOMIZER,” issued Mar. 2, 2004, to Perry W. Croll, et al., the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. It is believed that the inventors' prior work in small size atomizing nozzles, disclosed in the aforementioned '429 patent, constitutes the most advanced “state of the art” in the area of disposable atomizing nozzle components having a small cross-section profile permitting their insertion into medically related tubes and orifices.
Bodies of atomizer components structured according to the disclosure of Croll et al. include an injection molded socket into which is adhesively bonded an extension tube member. Issues inherent in the injection molding process effectively limit a size (e.g., diameter) that can reliably be manufactured for such socket. It is believed that a minimum socket wall thickness that can be reliably injection molded is about 0.015 inch (0.381 mm). Therefore, a realistic minimum socket diameter is about 0.030 inch (0.76 mm) larger than the outside diameter of an extension member. The maximum cross-sectional body diameter of the atomizer components disclosed in Croll et al. is even larger than the minimum outside socket diameter.
As disclosed in Croll et al. at col. 5, lines 47-56, the nominal diameter of the nozzle body Db is about 0.2 inch (0.5 cm), and the diameter of the cylindrical extension conduit De is about 0.1 inch (0.25 cm). Such numbers produce a ratio of atomizer body diameter to extension member diameter (Db/De) of 2.0. More precise direct measurements of a corresponding commercially available embodiment yield a maximum atomizer body diameter of 0.218 inch (0.55 cm) and extension member diameter of 0.121 inch (0.3 cm), producing a Db/De ratio of 1.8. Corresponding direct measurements of a commercially available alternative embodiment such as is illustrated in
A frontal area, or frontal cross-section, can be defined as that area in a fluid that must be displaced to accommodate straight-line passage of an object. As a further consequence of the injection molded socket, as the characteristic size of a frontal area cross-section (e.g., diameter Db, or span across a maximum size frontal area) of the body of an atomizer component is reduced toward and beyond a desired small characteristic size, the ratio of a round atomizer body diameter Db to round extension member diameter De (or Db/De) inevitably moves farther away from unity (in other words, Db/De becomes increasingly greater than one).
For purpose of this disclosure, an atomizer component having a desired small characteristic size means that a round body diameter is less than about 0.2 inch (0.5 cm). In that limiting case, with minimum socket wall thickness and 0.2 inch (0.5 cm) body diameter, the ratio of a round atomizer body diameter to a round extension member diameter is 0.2/0.17 or 1.176. The Db/De ratio inevitably increases (grows numerically larger from 1.176) as the diameters of the components are reduced while holding socket wall thickness at its minimum value for an injection molded part. If the extension member alone is made smaller in diameter (socket wall thickness is made greater than the minimum 0.015 inch (0.038 cm) while atomizer body diameter remains 0.2 inch (0.5 cm)), then the ratio of atomizer body diameter to extension member diameter is also correspondingly increased (grows numerically larger from 1.176).
Atomizing nozzle components may sometimes be characterized by the ratio of diameter of the atomizing component's body Db to the diameter of the ejection orifice O (or Db/O). Ejection orifices are typically sized small (e.g., about 0.010 to 0.008 inch (0.0254 to 0.02032 cm) in diameter) to cause a sufficient pressure drop to promote a reasonable atomizing result in dispensed fluid, but still must be large enough to deliver a reasonable flow rate of, e.g., treatment fluid and to resist clogging. It is believed that about 0.010 to 0.008 inch (0.0254 to 0.02032 cm) in diameter is a reasonable limit for the nominal size of operable ejection orifices.
It is axiomatic that, given a fixed orifice size, the smaller the diameter of the body Db, the smaller the numeric value for the ratio Db/O. The nominal body size of 0.2 inch (0.5 cm) and aforementioned sizes of ejection orifices of 0.008 and 0.10 yield db/O ratios of 25 and 20, respectively. Using the smallest commercially available body diameter of 0.188 in. (0.478 cm) in combination with the larger 0.010 inch (0.0254 cm) ejection orifice diameter (which is larger than the 0.008 inch (0.02032 cm) diameter orifice actually present in such device), a Db/O ratio of 18.8 is calculated. It is believed that all disposable prior art atomizers have a Db/O ratio greater than 18.8.
Atomizing nozzle components may sometimes be characterized by the ratio of the outside diameter (or maximum characteristic size) of an extension member to the diameter of the ejection orifice through which is expelled treatment fluid. A certain minimum fluid pressure is required to properly atomize a dispensed dose of fluid. The outside diameter of an extension conduit must be sufficiently large as to provide structural integrity to resist the pressure of treatment fluid upstream of the atomizing portion of the assembly. In accordance with Croll et al., certain extension conduits also may include one or more extra lumen in which to hold a deformable member, so the diameter of such extension members is even larger. Commercially available atomizer components corresponding to embodiments illustrated in
For atomizing components (and/or extension members) that are not round, similar ratios such as: atomizer body diameter to extension member diameter, or diameter of the extension member to the diameter of the ejection orifice, or diameter of the body to diameter of the ejection orifice, may be obtained using their maximum characteristic sizes. Therefore, for purpose of this disclosure, maximum characteristic size and diameter may sometimes be used interchangeably. For convenience, the term “maximum” may sometimes even be left out, with the understanding that a proper meaning may be logically deduced in context.
Atomizing nozzle components structured according to Croll et al. inherently include a shoulder disposed at the proximal end of the atomizing component and extension member interface area. A minimum effective shoulder of about 0.015 inch (0.038 cm) in elevation is caused by the minimal wall thickness required to reliably injection mold the socket in which to receive the extension member. In practice, even larger shoulders are present in commercially available embodiments. The step change in elevation (from the outside diameter of the extension member) at the atomizer component's shoulder forms a scraping edge that can undesirably damage tissue of a patient when the atomizing nozzle component is being withdrawn.
An atomizing nozzle may undesirably snag on structure during withdrawal of the nozzle subsequent to dispensing a treatment dose inside a patient. For example, the step change socket shoulder may form a structural interference at a distal opening of a medical tube, thereby resisting re-entrance of the atomizing nozzle component into the tube. Application of additional force on the proximal end of an extension member to overcome a shoulder induced interference while withdrawing an atomizing nozzle component introduces increased risk of decoupling the atomizing nozzle component from its extension member. It would be detrimental to decouple, and leave behind, an atomizing nozzle component in the body of a patient.
The socket is essentially required to provide sufficient bonding area to resist separation of the atomizing component from the extension member under the pressure required for atomizing operation. That is, a simple butt joint at the interface between the atomizing nozzle component and extension member is believed to provide too little surface area to form a reliable connection, at least in the small size desired (generally about 0.2 inch (0.5 cm), or less, in maximum cross-sectional diameter). Further, introduction of adhesive at a butt connection surface would undesirably introduce risk of occlusion by adhesive of the fluid delivery conduit. For the reasons listed in this and the preceding paragraphs, the ratio of the outside diameter (or maximum characteristic size) of an extension member to the diameter of the ejection orifice in prior atomizers is believed to be greater than about 12.
Certain disposable atomizing nozzle components are known, although such components have a maximum body diameter that is undesirably large, e.g., greater than 0.2 inch (0.5 cm). By “disposable,” it is intended to mean that an atomizing nozzle component of an assembly is sufficiently low in cost as to be disposed of after a single use. Of course, a “single use” might well include causing a plurality of discharges of sub-portions of treatment fluid. However, a “disposable” atomizer component is not generally re-sterilized, and repackaged, to permit its potential resale and/or reuse on a different patient. Disposable atomizing nozzle components are typically manufactured using low-cost mass production manufacturing techniques, such as injection molding from plastic or plastic-like materials. In contrast, a non-disposable atomizing nozzle may be machined from metal on a one-off basis, or in small lot production. The as manufactured cost of a disposable atomizing nozzle component is most preferably less than about $1.00, desirably less than about $10.00, and certainly less than about $100.00, including labor and constituent materials and measured in year 2009 United States currency.
Provided is an atomizing nozzle having a small frontal area permitting insertion of the nozzle into small diameter medical conduits. A body of one preferred atomizing nozzle body component has a characteristic size (.e.g., cross-sectional diameter) of less than about 0.2 inch (0.5 cm). The nozzle body is typically carried on an extension member, which can be transversely flexible to permit passage of a nozzle body through a tube and along a nonlinear path. Certain extension members may optionally be plastically deformable to permit orienting a discharge direction for atomized treatment fluid. Extension members may have any desired length. The nozzle body is typically connected to an extension member by way of a lap joint associated with the outside surface of the nozzle body. Preferred embodiments have a De/O ratio of less than 12.0, a Db/O ratio of less than about 18, and a Db/De ratio of less than about 1.1. Certain embodiments include a swirling chamber disposed immediately upstream of the ejection orifice and having a proximal chamber wall with a fluid-wetted portion configured to at least approximate a portion of a dome, or other curved surface.
Accordingly, described herein is an improved disposable atomizing nozzle component able to be advanced through a medically related tube having an inside diameter heretofore too small to accommodate the smallest known prior art disposable atomizing nozzles. Also described is an atomizing nozzle-to-extension member interface shoulder transition having less than about 0.015 inch (0.038 cm) in elevation change. Further described is a disposable atomizing nozzle component and extension assembly that may be advanced into, and retracted from, a subject while reducing the likelihood of imparting trauma to that subject. The risk of decoupling an atomizing element from an extension member as the atomizer is withdrawn from a patient is further reduced. Further provided is a disposable atomizing nozzle component that provides increased fluid dynamic efficiency.
In the drawings, which illustrate what are currently regarded as the best modes for carrying out the invention:
Described is an apparatus and method for applying treatment fluid, such as anesthetic, to facilitate certain medical procedures. Non-exclusive and exemplary uses of devices structured according to certain principles of the invention include: endotracheal intubation of an awake patient; pulmonary therapy; intranasal drug delivery; sinus cavity drug delivery for delivering antibiotics; laryngo-tracheal delivery for anesthetizing the vocal cords prior to intubation; chromoendoscopy and other delivery of drugs thru an endoscope accessory port targeting the gastrointestinal mucosa; integration into an airway for intubation; delivery of surfactant at distal end of endotracheal tube to deliver drug into the lung of a neonatal patient; delivery of antibiotics or other drugs to lungs of ventilated patients via endotracheal tube; delivery of thrombin or other hemostasis agents for surgical bleeding in open or laparoscopic surgery; and delivery of, for example, bupivacaine or other fluid for pain control in open and laparoscopic surgery.
Currently preferred fluid dispensing devices are adapted to atomize expelled treatment fluid. By “atomize expelled fluid,” is meant that the discharged fluid is dispersed substantially as a mist or cloud composed of very small droplets. Design variables incorporated in an atomizing nozzle include characteristic size of the discharge orifice, amount of pressure applied to the fluid upstream of the discharge orifice, and any spin chamber structural arrangement to induce fluid spin. Effective atomization requires an expelled fluid to pass through a pressure drop at a discharge orifice. Further, the expelled fluid has a rotational component of motion, (spin) about the discharge axis. Radial spread of the ejected cloud increases in correspondence with increases in the spin rate.
A first currently preferred dispenser for a treatment fluid is illustrated generally at 100 in
As illustrated in
A workable extension member 106 may be formed from medical grade tubing, such as the illustrated approximately 0.060 inch (0.152 cm) diameter clear plastic tubing. Such extension conduit 106 is typically transversely flexible, and may therefore be formed into the illustrated coiled shape. Certain extension conduit 106 may be structured to permit its insertion along the lumen of a medical tube, or into conduit structure of a human or animal body. In such cases, transverse flexibility of the extension conduit 106 may facilitate insertion by accommodating to a nonlinear lumen or conduit path. However, flexibility of an extension conduit 106 is not always required. In certain cases, an extension member may be substantially rigid. Sometimes, and as further detailed below, the extension member may include a plastically malleable portion that is structured to help the conduit maintain a deformed shape. In the latter case, the malleable portion is typically adapted to maintain a desired shape in the extension conduit effective to orient the spray axis 110 of the dispensing nozzle.
One currently preferred arrangement forming a dispensing nozzle 104 is illustrated in
The outside diameter of illustrated atomizer body 168 (
It is also desirable for adhesive 188 to form a transition ramp, generally indicated at 192, at the proximal end of coupling 164. Such a transition ramp resists snagging (of the small shoulder formed by the thickness of the coupling 164), during withdrawal of the nozzle 104. A smooth transition ramp 192 desirably resists scraping tissue from a patient's conduit structure. A smooth transition ramp 192 also desirably avoids a structural interference with the shoulder of a distal opening of a medical conduit through which the atomizer 104 may be retracted.
With reference now to
With reference to
As illustrated, a wall element 200 may be formed from a spherical element, such as a ball. It is within contemplation that a wall element 200 could be a curved portion carried on a distal end of a cylinder, or by some other carrier having a different shape. The currently preferred wall element 200 is formed by a series 316 stainless steel ball having an outside diameter of 1/32 inch (0.76 mm), commercially available from worldwideweb.precisionballs.com. Of course, other elements of composition are also workable.
Additional details of a workable atomizer body 168 will now be discussed with reference to
A second atomizer assembly structured according to certain principles of the invention is indicated generally at 240 in
Of note, embodiments of the type illustrated in
The outside diameter of atomizer body 168 may be of any desired size that may be manufactured. It is preferred to injection mold atomizer bodies 168 from medical grade plastic, such as, for example, polycarbonate. Of course, the inside diameter of fluid delivery conduit 176 is typically sized in agreement with the size of body 168 to permit their assembly. It is currently preferred for body 168 to form a slight press-fit inside fluid delivery conduit 176, to facilitate assembly. Similar to assembly 100, an annular ring 184 of adhesive 188 may be provided to resist decoupling the body 168 from the lumen 176. Note that the body 168 and conduit 176 are not required to be round, although such construction is more simple.
The extension member of certain assemblies may optionally include a plastically malleable portion that is structured to help the fluid delivery conduit 176 maintain a deformed shape, and thereby orient a discharge axis 110 (e.g., see axis 110 in
Wire 244 may be deformed as desired to orient a discharge direction of atomized treatment fluid. It is within contemplation that a deformable element may be associated with an extension member in alternative ways, such as by providing a plastically deformable extension element, adhering a deformable element to an exterior surface of a flexible extension member, spiraling a deformable element around the external surface of the extension member, locating the malleable element inside the fluid delivery conduit 176, or using alternative arrangements well within the capability of one of ordinary skill in the art.
It is generally desirable to provide a blunt distal tip 248 in an extension member, such as extension member 106′. RF tipping, or other conventional manufacturing techniques, is workable to form a desired blunt tip 248.
Actuation of the syringe 102 of
Once being made aware of the instant disclosure, other and further ways of making, using, and assembling the apparatus will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Many of the components are readily commercially available or may be adapted from commercially available components.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US10/02805 | 10/20/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/5/2013 |