Patent Grant
8373857
The present invention relates to devices and methods for measuring optical characteristics such as color spectrums, translucence, gloss, and other characteristics of objects such as teeth, and more particularly to devices and methods for measuring the color and other optical characteristics of teeth, fabric or numerous other objects, materials or surfaces.
A need has been recognized for devices and methods of measuring the color or other optical characteristics of teeth and other objects, particularly in the field of dentistry. Reference is made to the following applications, all by inventors hereof, which are hereby incorporated by reference, which disclose various systems and methods for measuring teeth and other objects: U.S. application Ser. No. 09/091,208, filed on Jun. 8, 1998, which is based on International Application No. PCT/US97/00126, filed on Jan. 2, 1997, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/581,851, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,229, issued Apr. 28, 1998, for Apparatus and Method for Measuring Optical Characteristics of an Object; U.S. application Ser. No. 09/091,170, filed on Jun. 8, 1998, which is based on International Application No. PCT/US97/00129, filed on Jan. 2, 1997, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/582,054, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,759,030 issued Jun. 2, 1998, for Apparatus and Method for Measuring Optical Characteristics of Teeth; PCT Application No. PCT/US98/13764, filed on Jun. 30, 1998, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/886,223, filed on Jul. 1, 1997, for Apparatus and Method for Measuring Optical Characteristics of an Object; PCT Application No. PCT/US98/13765, filed on Jun. 30, 1998, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/886,564, filed on Jun. 30, 1998, for Apparatus and Method for Measuring Optical Characteristics of Teeth; and U.S. application Ser. No. 08/886,566, filed on Jul. 1, 1997, for Method and Apparatus for Detecting and Preventing Counterfeiting. The foregoing patent documents are sometimes referenced collectively herein as the “Referenced Patent Documents.”
The foregoing patent documents disclose a variety of systems and methods for measuring teeth and other objects. For example, FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,826 discloses a system that uses a pen-like probe that could be held much like a pencil with the probe tip directed to the tooth or other object. FIG. 35 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,826 discloses a handheld configuration which may be held much like a gun, with a switch located in a position for the “trigger function” to activate the system. One color measuring system introduced to the market has a physical configuration in which the user holds the instrument “football style” (the user's hand cradles the instrument much like a user would hold a football in a traditional football throwing motion). In general, in the field of dentistry a variety of stylus, probe, gun-like and other implements have been proposed and/or utilized to varying degrees of commercial acceptance.
Although the systems described in the Referenced Patent Documents, and the above mentioned dental implements, provide a variety of physical arrangements for dental instruments, there is still a need, particularly with respect to instruments that are capable of quantifying the optical properties of dental objects such as teeth, for instruments that are easier to hold and utilize in the dental or similar environment as compared with such existing physical arrangements. In particular, there is a need for instruments of improved physical construction so that dentists and other users may measure teeth and other objects comfortably and precision, and preferably without bending or contorting the wrist, hand or other body parts.
There also continues to be a need for such instruments with improved infection prevention implements, and for such instruments that utilize multiple spectrometers to more optimally measure and quantify the optical properties of translucent, pearlescent or other optically complex materials.
The present invention provides a new and improved physical arrangement, particularly for a spectrometer or spectrophotometer-based instrument, that facilitates the measurement of optical properties of teeth and other dental and other objects and materials.
In accordance with the present invention, a housing encloses a spectrometer or spectrophotometer; preferably multiple spectrometers are utilized in order to measure multiple spectrums (preferably simultaneously) of light received from the object under test. The housing includes a body portion that preferably houses the spectrometer(s) or spectrophotometer(s) (herein, a spectrophotometer generally consists of a spectrometer and light source, and perhaps a power source such as a battery). The spectrometer assembly preferably is located in the palm of the user's hand. Extending from, and preferably integral with, the body portion is neck portion. Extending from, and preferably integral with, the neck portion is a tip portion. Optics, such as light guiding fiber optics or the like, preferably carry light to a probe tip at an end of the portion, at which point the light leaves the instrument in order to illuminate the tooth or other object or material, and return the light to the spectrometer(s) for analysis.
In accordance with preferred embodiments, the neck portion is configured to have an upper portion that includes a location for placement of a user's index finger. This location may have an indenture or other textured area or friction surface (such as small bumps, a rubber surface or the like that tends to increase the friction between the user's index finger and the instrument) such that a user's index finger may be securably be positioned at that location. With the user's index finger reliably positioned at such a location on the neck portion, the tip portion of the instrument may be more precisely moved towards a desired or predetermined location on the tooth or other object so that the tip may measure the desired or predetermined location.
Also in accordance with preferred embodiments, one or a plurality of switches are provided for activation and/or control of the instrument, preferably located and operated in a manner such that the measurement is not adversely affected by undesired movement induced by the switch activation. One or more switches may be located in a position where an index finger is positioned during use of the instrument. Alternatively, one or more switches may be located on a lower surface of the body portion such that the switch may be activated by a squeezing motion of one or more of the user's fingers, while not pulling the instrument away from the desired or predetermined location on the tooth or other object. In addition (or alternatively), the tip may move respect to other parts of the tip portion or the neck and body portion such that the movement of the tip may be detected electrically, mechanically or optically.
An improved barrier infection control implement also is preferably utilized in accordance with the present invention. Preferably, a pliant, stretchy, transparent material fully encases and covers the tip portion of the instrument. In preferred embodiments, an inner surface of the infection control implement is relatively smooth or “satinized” in order to facilitate guiding the tip portion of the instrument into the infection control implement, and an outer surface of the infection control implement has a degree of tackiness or stickiness, particularly as compared to the inner surface, such that upon contact with the object under evaluation the tip portion mildly adheres to the surface of the object. With such an outer surface, measurement of objects such as teeth are facilitated, as the tip of the instrument may be directed to a desired spot of the object for evaluation, with the stickiness, or “non-slippery-ness,” of the outer surface of the infection control implement serving to prevent movement of the tip from the desired spot on the object. Preferably, a calibration measurement of a material of known or predetermined optical characteristics serve to calibrate out any optical effect introduced by the infection control implement. Such a calibration measurement preferably is conducted at instrument powerup, prior to taking actual measurements, at periodic or other suitable intervals. Such a calibration measurement also serves to normalize the instrument and calibrate out effects due to lamp drift, aging of fiber optics, optical couplers, filters and other optical components and the like, as well as to normalize the electronics and produce a “black level,” such as described in the previously referenced patent documents.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved spectrometer/spectrophotometer, and/or housing arrangement for a spectrometer or spectrophotometer, particularly for the field of dentistry.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved spectrometer/spectrophotometer, and/or housing arrangement for a spectrometer or spectrophotometer, particularly having a body portion that encloses the spectrometer or spectrometer and fits in the user's hand during operation of the instrument.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved spectrometer/spectrophotometer, and/or housing arrangement for a spectrometer or spectrophotometer, particularly having a neck portion with an index finger placement location.
It is still another object of the present invention having one or more switches that activate or control the instrument and are arranged, such as with a moveable tip, located on an under side of the body portion, such that the one or more switches may be operated while not having the act of activating the switch induce undesired movement of the instrument.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved instrument for, and methods of making, optical measurements utilizing a plurality of spectrometers or other color measuring devices in order to quantify optical properties of materials that may be translucent, pearlescent or otherwise optically complex; particular example being human teeth and restorative dental materials, gems, multi-layered painted articles and the like.
Finally, it is an object of the present invention to provide such an instrument that may be utilized with a barrier infection or contamination control implement, which preferably has a smooth inner surface and a slip-resistant outer surface, the inner surface of which preferably serves to facilitate insertion of the instrument's probe tip into the infection or contamination control implement, and the outer surface of which preferably facilitates measurement of the object under evaluation by providing a probe tip surface that tends not to slip during from the desired measurement spot during the optical measurement.
The above objects and other advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail the preferred embodiments of the present invention with reference to the attached drawings in which:
The present invention will be described in greater detail with reference to certain preferred and alternative embodiments. As described below, refinements and substitutions of the various embodiments are possible based on the principles and teachings herein.
In operation, the spectrometer assembly within body portion 6A/6B preferably is located in the palm of the user's hand, thus enabling the spectrometer assembly to be positioned close to the object under test, and preferably so that no optical fibers or the like that serve to couple light from the object under test to the spectrometer assembly will be bent or kinked by user of the instrument (the adverse affects, such as optical transmission changes, from bending or kinking optical fibers are described in greater detail in the Referenced Patent Documents). Extending from, and preferably integral with, body portion 6A/6B is neck portion 8 (in the illustrated embodiment, neck portion 8 is formed from the upper and lower portions 6A and 6B of the body portion, although the present invention is not necessarily limited to this construction. With neck portion 8 also consisting of upper and lower portions, the upper portion may be removed such as to facilitate assembly, such as positioning of fiber optics or light guiding members, etc., into the tip, etc. Preferably, the neck portion extends in a curved manner in a direction away from the body portion and toward the tip and the person whose tooth is to be measured (as more fully described elsewhere herein). As will be appreciated, the neck portion may extend in a direction and length so as to facilitate measurement of the target object, such as a tooth in a patient's mouth.
Extending from, and preferably integral with, neck portion 8 is tip portion 10. Optics, such as light guiding fiber optics or the like, preferably carry light to tip end 12 at end of tip portion 10, at which point the light leaves the instrument in order to illuminate the tooth or other object or material, and return the light to the spectrometer for analysis. With such a probe configuration, with neck portion 8 and tip portion 10 configured such as illustrated, the instrument may more readily extend into the mouth of a patient and serve to facilitate the measurement of teeth and the like. Preferably, neck portion 8 and tip portion 10 together may serve as a form of cheek retractor, or have a length and shape, so as to enable measurement of posterior or inside/back teeth of a patient, as opposed to other techniques in which only anterior or front teeth may be measured. While the illustrated shape of
In accordance with preferred embodiments, the neck portion is configured to have an upper portion that includes a location (such as location 4, as illustrated in
Also in accordance with preferred embodiments, one or a plurality of switches are provided for activation and/or control of the instrument, preferably located and operated in a manner such that the measurement is not adversely affected by undesired movement induced by the switch activation. One or more switches may be located on a lower surface of the body portion such that the switch may be activated by a squeezing motion of one or more of the user's fingers, while not pulling the instrument away from the desired or predetermined location on the tooth or other object. In addition (or alternatively), the tip may move respect to other parts of the tip portion or the neck and body portion such that the movement of the tip may be detected electrically, mechanically or optically. In one exemplary preferred embodiment, a membrane or spring activated-type switch is positioned within location 4, such that a movement of the user's index finger causes activation of the switch, which may be detected such as to initiate a measurement (which may be a measurement of the object under test, a calibration or normalization reference or standard, etc.). What is important is that body portion 6A/6B include an intuitive and nature placement for position of one or more of the operator's fingers, preferably in a manner that naturally and intuitively guides the probe tip towards a desired area for measurement, with a switch that may be activated with a slight and natural movement that does not tend to cause undesired motion of the probe tip from the desired area for measurement (as described in the Referenced Patent Documents, for example, movement away from such a desired area or at an undesired angle, etc., may be detected or quantified, with optical measurements either adjusted or rejected based on the movement or amount of movement, etc.).
Generally, implementations of such embodiments constitute spectrophotometers, which generally consist of a light source (e.g., light source 14) that provides light to the object under test (e.g., such as via light source member 16, which may constitute a fiber optic or fiber optic assembly). Light is returned from the object and received and carried (e.g., such as via light receiver member 18, which may constitute a fiber optic or fiber optic assembly or multiple fiber optics, as in preferred embodiments to be described hereinafter) to spectrometer assembly 20 for analysis. In accordance with preferred embodiments of the present invention, however, spectrometer 20 is positioned inside of body portion 6A/6B so that the bulk of spectrometer assembly 20 is effectively positioned inside the operator's hand, with neck portion 8 and tip portion 10 extending away from body portion 6A/6B in a manner to facilitate measurement of objects such as teeth, which may be inconveniently located, such as inside of a person's mouth.
As will be appreciated from
In a similar manner, the light provided to the object under may be generated by a light source integral to body portion 6A/6B (such as via light source 14), or may be generated by a light that is not integral to body portion 6A/6B but is instead generated external to body portion 6A/6B and provided to body portion 6A/6B via an optical cable (such as a light source fiber optic). In one such embodiment, an external unit provides light to body portion 6A/6B via a fiber optic cable or cable assembly (e.g., collection of fiber optics), with data and/or power cables being provided along with the fiber optic cable/cable assembly from the external unit. With such embodiments, the external unit may include a power supply, light source, display and associated electronics/processing, such that body portion 6A/6B includes fiber optics to provide light to and from the object under test, with spectrometer assembly 20 generating spectral data, which may then be transferred to a processor in the external unit via the data cables. As will be appreciated, the light source optic cable/cable assembly and the data and/or power cables may be provided, for example, in a single monocoil, such as may be constructed with stainless steel, aluminum or other material known in the art. Such exemplary arrangements will be explained in greater detail hereinafter.
What is important to note from
As described elsewhere herein and in the Referenced Patent Documents, in preferred embodiments spectral measurements are made with a highly miniaturized spectrometer assembly, which preferably consist of an array or other plurality of sensors (preferably consisting of light to frequency converters), with light coupled to at least certain of the sensors via filters or filter elements (which preferably are interference filters, and which may be discrete bandpass type filters, or which collectively may consist of a color gradient or linear variable type filter, etc.). Preferably, light is coupled from a light source to the object under test via one or more light sources, which may be fiber optics, and preferably light is received from the object under test and coupled to the sensors via the filters or filter elements. Embodiments of the present invention provide improvements and enhancements to concepts such as the foregoing, and enable improved systems and methods for measuring the optical properties of optically complex materials, including objects that are translucent, pearlescent, etc., and including objects such as teeth, dental restorations, gems, etc. In certain preferred embodiments, a multi-spectrometer design is utilized to provide multiple spectral-type measurements, preferably in parallel, and preferably with different source-receiver combinations that enable various complex materials to be optically measured.
Referring now to
Fibers 24B from fiber bundle 24A are provided to probe tip 26 as illustrated. In the illustrated embodiment, fibers 24B constitute 12 fibers, which may consist of 1.0 millimeter plastic fibers. The arrangement of fibers 24B in probe tip 26, which serve to provide a plurality of light sources, or effectively a ring of light, are illustrated in
Light returned from the object under test is received by probe tip 26 via a plurality of light receivers. Such light receivers preferably may consist of a center light receiver 30, preferably a 1 millimeter plastic fiber, and also a first set (preferably three) of light receivers 33 not from the center of the probe tip and a second set (preferably three) of light receivers 28 also not from the center of the probe tip.
Center light receiver 30 is preferably coupled to a plurality of sensors via a plurality of filters, with the filters preferably providing bandpass filters spaced over the spectral band(s) of interference; for example, the filters may have bandpass characteristics such that the filters collectively span the visible band, such as described in the Referenced Patent Documents. In a preferred embodiment, center light receiver 30 is coupled to randomized fiber optic 31, which preferably has and input that receives light via light receiver 30 via optical coupler/splitter 30A (which may include a lens to collimate light from light receiver 30 to more optimally couple the light provided to randomized fiber optic 31), and has twelve outputs, each of which provides light that is coupled to a sensor through one of the filters. As described in the Referenced Patent Documents, the use of a such a randomized implement may help serve to destroy any angular or similar dependencies of the light received by light receiver 30, with the light provided to the twelve outputs being more or less equal or having reduced dependency as to where on light receiver 30 is the received light receiver (and at what angle, etc.) over the twelve outputs. Preferably, randomized fiber optic 31 is an optical implement which constitutes a large number of preferably glass fibers, with an input area that is randomly divided and apportioned to N (preferably 12) output areas, which in the illustrated embodiment constitute 12 fiber optic bundles each of which couples light to a sensor via a filter. As also described in the Referenced Patent Documents, such a randomized implement efficiently provides light to the filter/sensor combinations with less angular dependencies, etc. The N (preferably 12) outputs of randomized fiber optic 31, and the associated filter/sensors, preferably provide a first spectrometer/spectral sensing implement for generating spectral data based on the light received from the object under test.
Light receivers 28 preferably are coupled to sensors via filters in order to provide a second spectrometer/spectral sensing implement for generating spectral data based on the light received from the object under test. In the illustrated embodiment, light receivers 28 constitute three fiber optics. While three fiber optics may be coupled to filters/sensors and provide a three band spectral sensing device, in the illustrated embodiment six spectral bands are utilized for the second spectrometer/spectral sensing device. In the illustrated embodiment, the three fibers of light receivers 28 are coupled to light pipe 29 (which may be a 2 millimeter plastic light pipe), which serves to couple and mix and diffuse light from (preferably) three input fibers 28 to (preferably) six output fibers 32. The preferably six output fibers are coupled to filters/sensors as illustrated. The preferably 6 output fibers, and the associated filter/sensors, preferably provide a second spectrometer/spectral sensing implement for generating spectral data based on the light received from the object under test.
Light receivers 33 typically are coupled to sensors via neutral density filters (or no filters) and are preferably used to provide topology sensors (see, e.g., the discussion in the Referenced Patent Documents). In yet other alternative embodiments, light receivers 33 could be provided to sensors without filters, could be provided to sensors via fine bandpass filters and look at only particular spectral lines (for example, in order to detect the presence of specific materials that reflect or emit light in such particular spectral bands, etc.). In preferred embodiments, however, such light receivers 33 serve to provide positional or topology information (e.g., angle of the probe with respect to the surface of the object under test), such as described in the Referenced Patent Documents.
In
In
In
In
Based on the foregoing, it will be understood that an instrument may be provided that utilizes multiple spectrometers in parallel, including multiple spectrometers that may serve to make spectral measurements, preferably in parallel, of the object under test. As described in greater detail in the Referenced Patent Documents, the numerical aperture, diameters and spacing of the light sources and receivers define a “critical height” below which light that is reflected from the surface of the object under test cannot be received and propagated by the light receivers. Measurements below the critical height thus are generally not dependent upon surface characteristics, as light reflected from the surface is not going to be received by the light receivers and thus sensed by the spectrometers. Light that enters the light receivers generally is light that enters the bulk of the material of the object, is scattered and displaced so that it can exit the material at a position and angle to be received and propagated by the light receivers (see the Referenced Patent Documents for a more detailed discussion of this phenomenon). Consider probe tip 26 being in contact with the surface of the object under test. In such a condition, the various source/receiver combinations provided by probe tip 26 each will be below the critical height. While conventional approaches tend to characterize optical properties that include surface reflected light (and thus tend to be more sensitive to surface irregularities, angle, etc.), it has been discovered that optically more complex objects such as teeth, which are highly translucent, may be more optimally quantified with such below the critical height measurements. With the multi-spectrometer approach of the present invention, multiple spectrometers may make multiple below the critical height measurements in parallel, and thus provide substantial optical data from which optical characteristics of the object under test (such as a shade or color prediction) may be determined.
Without being bound by theory, a discussion of certain benefits and principles of the foregoing approach will now be described. As will be appreciated from
For example, for an instrument that is used to shade match teeth or dental restorations, the material may be a tooth or a ceramic restoration. The constituent materials generally have different optical properties, and may have different layers of differing thicknesses of differing is materials in order to produce colors that are perceived to be the same by viewing human observer. Having only a single spectral measurement, for example, has been determined to provide less than sufficient data for a sufficient shade or color determination or prediction.
In accordance with the present invention, the multiple spectrometers each make spectral measurements. Depending upon the type of material under examination, for example a natural tooth versus a dental restoration (and for example a denture tooth versus a porcelain-fused-to metal “PFM” crown), with the present invention different shade prediction criteria may be utilized. For example, user input may inform the instrument what type of material is under examination; alternatively, the instrument could collect data from the multiple spectrometers and predict the type of material (which could be confirmed or over-ridden by user input, etc.). In any event, after collecting spectral data, the instrument then desires to output a color or shade value. Typically, data is stored within the instrument in the form of lookup tables or the like, and measured data is compared in some form with the stored data of the various shades in order to predict and output the closest shade or color (see, e.g., the Referenced Patent Documents). In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, however, the measured data and lookup tables, or possible combinations thereof may be more optimally utilized depending upon the type of material under test.
For example, if a natural tooth is under examination, spectral data may be collected from the first and second spectrometers. Data from the first (center receiver) spectrometer, which generally is more sensitive to thickness, may be used exclusively for shade or color prediction, or weighted more heavily in the shade prediction as compared to data from the second (ring receiver) spectrometer, which generally is less sensitive to thickness. For a PFM restoration, which could consist of thin layers (as compared to a comparable sized natural tooth), thickness dependencies could present much greater problems with attempting to perform shade matching or color prediction for PFM samples. If a PFM restoration is under examination, spectral data may be collected from the first and second spectrometers. Data from the second (ring receiver) spectrometer, which generally is less sensitive to thickness, may be used exclusively for shade or color prediction, or weighted more heavily in the shade prediction as compared to data from the first (center receiver) spectrometer, which generally is more sensitive to thickness.
As will be understood from the foregoing, depending upon the type of material under test, a different shade matching/prediction method or algorithm will be performed. In accordance with such embodiments of the present invention, a first type of material under test (e.g., a natural tooth) would utilize a first shade matching algorithm (e.g., weigh data from the first spectrometer more heavily than data from the second spectrometer), and a second type of material under test (e.g., a PFM restoration) would utilize a second shade matching algorithm (e.g., weigh data from the second spectrometer more heavily than data from the first spectrometer). In addition, depending upon the type of material under test, different optical parameters could be utilized, again with different weights. For example, a prediction based on the closest “delta E” match between the stored shades or colors may be used for a first type of material under test, while a prediction that gives more (or less) weight to, for example “delta L” or “delta c” or “delta h,” may be used for second type of material (it being understood by those of skill in the art that L, c and h refer to luminance, chroma and hue of the well-know L-C-H system for representing color). Moreover, a first combination of data from the first and second spectrometers (with first weights given to the first and second spectrometers) and a first set of parameters (e.g., delta E) may be utilized for shade or color prediction for a first type of material, while a second combination of data from the first and second spectrometers (with second weights given to the first and second spectrometers) and a second set of parameters (e.g., delta L and/or delta c and/or delta h) may be utilized for shade or color prediction for a second type of material. With the present invention, multiple spectrometers, and/or multiple shade/color prediction/matching algorithms based on data from multiple spectrometers, may be utilized depending on the type of material being measured in order to more accurately predict/match shades and colors for a wide range of materials.
Other aspects of certain preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described.
Referring now to
In accordance with the present invention, as illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In preferred embodiments, an inner surface of the barrier 50 is relatively smooth or “satinized” in order to facilitate guiding the tip portion of the instrument into the barrier as described above, an outer surface of barrier 50 has a degree of tackiness or stickiness, particularly as compared to the inner surface, such that upon contact with the object under evaluation the tip portion mildly adheres to the surface of the object. With such an outer surface, measurement of objects such as teeth are facilitated, as the tip of the instrument may be directed to a desired spot of the object for evaluation, with the stickiness, or “non-slippery-ness,” of the outer surface of barrier 50 serving to prevent movement of the tip from the desired spot on the object.
Preferably, barrier 50 is manufactured by cutting or otherwise forming the material to be of the desired shape, which may include punching or otherwise forming hole 50B. This preferably is performed on substrate 51, and thus the material of barrier 50 and substrate 51 desirably may be formed of the desired overall shape in a single step. Preferably, the size and shape of hole 50B corresponds to protrusion 8A in order to reliably secure barrier 50 onto the probe. The material of barrier 50, and preferably substrate 51, is then folded, preferably in an automated manner. It should be noted that the fold is asymmetric in order to form an extended tab portion 50A of barrier 50, which may be utilized to pull barrier 50 into proper position, such as previously described. In preferred embodiments, weld 50C is formed via an RF (or other radiant energy process) or thermal type process, and preferably through substrate 51. It should be noted that the weld of the material of barrier 50 does not extend the full length of the material, but extends so as to define an inner pouch of barrier 50, while providing a substantially complete seal in order to provide a suitable contamination/infection control implement. It also should be noted that end portion 50D of barrier 50 consists of a portion not having a seam across end 12 of tip portion 10. In this regard, the width of the material used to form barrier 50 has a suitable width such that, when welded to form the pouch, and when stretched into position, a relatively flat, wrinkle-free and seam-free covering is provided over end portion 12 of tip portion 10.
Other aspects of preferred embodiments of the present invention win now be described.
In operation, a user preferably first applies barrier 50 (which may be considered an “infection control tip”), which is achieved by picking up handpiece 1 from its cradle and applying barrier 50, such as previously described. An exemplary screen shot of display 59, which reminds the user to apply barrier 50, and calibrate the instrument with the barrier in position, is illustrated in
Preferably, and in contrast to typically opaque calibration standards of conventional systems, calibration block 56 is a translucent or semi-transparent material, and preferably is chosen to have optical properties (such as color, translucency or the like) that is substantially in a middle portion of the range of optical properties for the particular materials that are to measured. For example, for a dental application, the optical properties of calibration block 56 preferably are an off-white shade and translucent, roughly in the middle of color and translucency values of normal human teeth. Having such a calibration block, rather than calibrating at an extreme of an optical range (such as pure white or pure black, etc.), has been determined to give more advantageous results. This has been determined to be particularly true for translucent materials such as dental objects. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that calibrating with a translucent material, for example, can help calibrate out effects of “edge loss,” which is understood to be a problem with conventional measurement techniques for translucent materials, etc.
Also in accordance with the present invention, calibration block 56 (it should be noted that calibration and normalization in this context may be generally considered synonymous) used for calibration may be removable and cleanable, such as by autoclave cleaning. Preferably, calibration block 56 is sufficiently durable, an exemplary material being porcelain, so as to be wiped clean or autoclaved repeatedly, without substantial degradation of optical properties. In certain embodiments and operative environments, where degradation of the optical properties of the calibration block may be of concern, a two step calibration/normalization process is applied. At a first point in time, a reference standard of known optical properties is measured. This “gold standard”, which may be provided with the known optical properties (which may be loaded into the instrument and stored), is measured with the instrument (the “gold standard” is then secured and stored in a manner to minimize any degradation of optical properties). Calibration block 56 is then measured. Based on the gold standard optical properties data (known/entered and measured), and based on the measurement of the calibration block a first set of calibration/normalization data is created. During normal operation, preferably prior to each use of the instrument, the calibration block is measured again, and based on a comparison with the first set of calibration/normalization data, a second set of calibration/normalization data is created. This second set of calibration/normalization data is preferably used to adjust the data resulting from normal operational measurements. Periodically, such as after a period of months, the gold standard may be measured again, and an updated first set of calibration/normalization data is created, etc. With such a process, changing optical properties of the calibration block, which would not be expected to change rapidly, and also be calibrated out.
It also should be noted that, in accordance with the present invention, a single calibration measurement may be used even though different types of materials may need to be measured. As previously described, for example, a dental professional may desire to measure a natural tooth and a restorative material tooth on the same patient. In accordance with the present invention, a calibration measurement is performed, which is independent of the type of material being measured. Thus, even though different shade prediction algorithms or the like may be utilized to carry out the shade prediction process (as previously described), a single calibration measurement may be conducted prior to measuring both types of materials. This is important in that, after measuring either the tooth or restorative material in the patient's mouth, a contamination risk is presented if the calibration block needs to be touched again prior to measuring the second material. In accordance with the present invention, only one calibration measurement needs to be made for measuring both types of materials.
Returning again to the calibration process as part of the normal operation of the instrument, in preferred embodiments a switch preferably internal to base unit 60 is activated as handpiece 1 in cradle 55 is rotated in position for the tip to be positioned in the middle of calibration block 56. In such embodiments, the instrument automatically knows that it is to enter calibration mode, and thus take a calibration measurement and generate calibration data accordingly. In alternative embodiments, calibration mode is entered upon first turning on the system or before taking a measurement, and the user must start the calibration measurement by depressing the switch (such as switch 51 of
It also should be noted that such a calibration measurement serves to normalize the instrument and calibrate out effects due to lamp drift, aging of fiber optics, optical couplers, filters and other optical components and the like, as well as to normalize the electronics and produce a “black level,” such as described in the Referenced Patent Documents.
It also should be noted from
Referring to
As illustrated in
Also in preferred embodiments, while a standard display may show an output of reduced form (such as the simple color or shade value of
In certain alternative embodiments, whether the output is a single or multiple shade guide values or colors (such as the multiple shade guide system values illustrated in
As described in the Referenced Patent Documents, data from spectrometer/spectrometer may be combined with an image from a camera. This can particularly be true in the context of dentistry, where often a shade assessment is a precursor to getting a restorative tooth produced. While the shade information is of particular importance to producing an aesthetically pleasing restoration, supplementing the shade information via a camera image also be useful to the dental professional or technician or other person involved in the process. With the present invention, a single or multiple areas of a tooth may be measured. Via the touch screen, the user, for example, may indicate to the instrument that one or multiple areas are to be measured. Thereafter, the user may then measure the one or multiple areas of the tooth. With a camera (such as a standard digital camera), an image of the tooth or teeth may be captured. Data captured with the image may be imported into a computing system that also receives the image from the digital camera. The measured shade data may then be superimposed onto the image from the digital camera, such as is illustrated in
In other embodiments, the shade or color data may be selectively superimposed or not superimposed (which may be performed with only a single image of the camera displayed, and which may be activated by mouse/click operation, pull down menus or the like). In yet other embodiments, a single or multi-image is displayed, with shade data superimposed, and with additional color or spectral data displayed (such as is illustrated in the displays of
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific preferred and other embodiments, it is evident that many substitutions, alternatives and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all of the alternatives and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it should be understood that, in accordance with the various alternative embodiments described herein, various systems, and uses and methods based on such systems, may be obtained. The various refinements and alternative and additional features also described may be combined to provide additional advantageous combinations and the like in accordance with the present invention. Also as will be understood by those skilled in the art based on the foregoing description, various aspects of the preferred embodiments may be used in various subcombinations to achieve at least certain of the benefits and attributes described herein, and such subcombinations also are within the scope of the present invention. All such refinements, enhancements and further uses of the present invention are within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/154,246, filed Jun. 6, 2011, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/343,366, filed Dec. 23, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,978,317, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/541,957, filed Oct. 2, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,477,364, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/146,488, filed Jun. 6, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,116,408, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/081,879, filed Feb. 21, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,903,318.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3327584 | Kissinger | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3436157 | Adler et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3507042 | Hana | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3555262 | Shimada | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3684868 | Christie et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3743429 | Kawai | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3748741 | Yerkes, Jr. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3778541 | Bowker | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3940608 | Kissinger et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3986777 | Roll | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4054389 | Owen | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4096217 | Roll | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4115922 | Alderman | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4125329 | French et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4184175 | Mullane, Jr. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4207678 | Jeanette | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4241738 | Lubbers et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4278353 | Ostermayer, Jr. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4290433 | Alfano | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4382784 | Freller | May 1983 | A |
| 4411626 | Becker et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4434654 | Hulsing, II et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4464054 | Karras et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4487206 | Aagard | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4505589 | Ott et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4560275 | Goetz | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4568191 | Barry | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4575805 | Moermann et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4616933 | Leveque et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4654794 | O'Brien | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4666309 | Barry et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4687329 | Schultz | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4707138 | Coatney | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4728290 | Eisner et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4730922 | Bach et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4773063 | Hunsperger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4798951 | Walker | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4823169 | Ogura | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4836674 | Lequime et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4844617 | Kelderman et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4878485 | Adair | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881811 | O'Brien | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4914512 | Sekiguchi | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917500 | Lugos | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4957371 | Pellicori et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4966458 | Burns et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4986671 | Sun et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4988206 | Melleney et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5017772 | Hafle | May 1991 | A |
| 5028139 | Kramer et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5040940 | Kolodziej et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5095210 | Wheatley et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5139335 | Lundeen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142383 | Mallik | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5159199 | LaBaw | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5164597 | Lodder | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5166755 | Gat | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5193525 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5229841 | Taranowski et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5245404 | Jannson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5306144 | Hibst et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308771 | Zhou et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5309256 | Takada et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5329935 | Takahashi | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5369481 | Berg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371586 | Chau | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5377669 | Schulz | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383020 | Vieillefosse | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386292 | Massen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387977 | Berg et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392110 | Yojima et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5401954 | Richert | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5401967 | Stedman et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5404218 | Nave et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410410 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410413 | Sela | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5428450 | Vieillefosse et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5450193 | Carlsen et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450203 | Penkethman | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450511 | Dragone | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453838 | Danielian et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5457525 | Ohtsuka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5461476 | Fournier | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5467289 | Abe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469249 | Magyar, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474449 | Loge et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5477332 | Stone et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5479252 | Worster et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483259 | Sachs | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5483335 | Tobias | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5487661 | Peithman | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5497227 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5498157 | Hall | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5533628 | Tao | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543920 | Collins et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5560355 | Merchant et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565976 | Fieggen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5575284 | Athan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5583631 | Lazzerini | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590251 | Takagi | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592294 | Ota et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5604594 | Juffinger | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609978 | Giorgianni et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5625459 | Driver | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5650940 | Tonozuka et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5663656 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5668633 | Cheetam et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671735 | MacFarlane et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5684807 | Bianchini, Jr. et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690486 | Zigelbaum | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695949 | Galen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696751 | Juffinger | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5742060 | Ashburn | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745229 | Jung et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5754283 | Keane et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757496 | Yamazaki | May 1998 | A |
| 5759030 | Jung et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766006 | Murljacic | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774610 | O'Rourke et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5784507 | Holm-Kennedy et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5798839 | Berner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822474 | Hara | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5845077 | Fawcett | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850195 | Berlien, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850301 | Mizuochi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851113 | Jung et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871351 | Jung et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880826 | Jung et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883708 | Jung et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889683 | Ismail et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5924981 | Rothfritz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926262 | Jung et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5961324 | Lehmann | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5961327 | Lohn | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963332 | Feldman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5966205 | Jung et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989022 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995235 | Sui et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002488 | Berg et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007332 | O'Brien | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008905 | Breton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6030209 | Panzera et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031928 | Scott | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6037629 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038016 | Jung et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038024 | Berner | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040902 | Jung et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6043894 | Van Aken et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052195 | Mestha et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6057925 | Anthon | May 2000 | A |
| 6078398 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086274 | Krzyminski | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6111650 | Rawicz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118521 | Jung et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6127673 | Jung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130752 | Smith | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6188471 | Jung et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6222620 | Jung et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233047 | Jung et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239868 | Jung et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246471 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246479 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249339 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249340 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249348 | Jung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254385 | Jung et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264470 | Jung et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271913 | Jung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6301004 | Jung et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307629 | Jung et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6512577 | Ozanich | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6750971 | Overbeck et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6836325 | Maczura et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6847447 | Ozanich | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 7099012 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7785103 | Jung et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 049 905 | Apr 1982 | EP |
| 0 167 750 | Jan 1986 | EP |
| 0 266 682 | May 1988 | EP |
| 0 681 256 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| 2 135 074 | Aug 1984 | GB |
| 54-103055 | Aug 1979 | JP |
| 1-262428 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| 2-066429 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| 3-296626 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 4-045776 | Jul 1992 | JP |
| 7-294425 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| WO 8603292 | Jun 1986 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Aswell, Cecil J. et al., “A Monolithic Light-to-Frequency Converter with a Scalable Sensor Array”, IEEE, 1994, pp. 122-123 and 158-159. |
| Bangston et al., “The Conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimilus values”, Nov. 1982, pp. 610-617, vol. 48, No. 5, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Barghi et al., “Effects of batch variation on shade of dental porcelain”, Nov. 1985, pp. 625-627, vol. 54, No. 5, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment, “How to improve shade matching in the dental operatory”, Feb. 1981, pp. 209-210, vol. 102, JADA. |
| Davison et al., “Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel”, Jan. 1990, pp. 97-101, vol. 63, No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Dickerson, “Trilogy of Creating an Esthetic Smile”, Jul. 1996, pp. 1-7, vol. 1, Issue 3, Technical Update—A Publication of Micro Dental Laboratories. |
| Goldstein et al., “Repeatability of specially designed intraoral colorimeter”, Jun. 1993, pp. 616-619, vol. 69, No. 6, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Goodkind et al., “A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurement of 100 natural teeth”, Jan. 1985, pp. 105-109, vol. 53, No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Ishikawa et al., “Trial Manufacture of Photoelectric Colorimeter Using Optical Fibers”, Nov. 1969, pp. 191-197, vol. 10, No. 4, Bull, Tokyo dent. Coll. |
| Johnston et al., “The Color Accuracy of the Kubelka-Munk Theory for Various Colorants in Maxillofacial Prosthetic Material”, Sep. 1987, pp. 1438-1444, vol. 66, No. 9, J. Dent. Res. |
| Johnston et al., “Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry”, May 1989, pp. 819-822, vol. 68, No. 5, J. Dent. Res. |
| Kato et al., “The Current State of Porcelain Shades: A Discussion”, Oct. 1984, pp. 559-571, vol. 8, No. 9, Quintessence of Dental Technology. |
| Miller, “Organizing color in dentistry”, Dec. 1987, pp. 26E-40E, Special Issue, JADA. |
| Miller et al., “Shade selection and laboratory communication”, May 1993, pp. 305-309, vol. 24, No. 5, Quintessence International. |
| O'Brien et al., “Coverage Errors of Two Shade Guides”, Jan./Feb. 1991, pp. 45-50, vol. 4, No. 1, The International Journal of Prosthodontics. |
| O'Brien et al., “A New, Small-color-difference Equation for Dental Shades”, Nov. 1990, pp. 1762-1764, vol. 69, No. 11, J. Dent. Res. |
| O'Keefe et al., “Color Shade and Matching: The Weak Link in Esthetic Dentistry”, Feb. 1990, pp. 116-120, vol. XI, No. 2, Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. |
| Pensler, “A New Approach to Shade Selection”, Sep. 1991, pp. 668-675, vol. XII, No. 9, Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. |
| Preston et al., “Light and Lighting in the Dental Office”, Jul. 1978, pp. 431-451, vol. 22, No. 3, Dental Clinics of North America. |
| Preston, “Current status of shade selection and color matching”, Jan. 1985, pp. 47-58, vol. 16, No. 1, Quintessence International. |
| Rosenstiel et al., “The effects of manipulative variables on the color of ceramic metal restorations”, Sep. 1987, pp. 297-303, vol. 60, No. 3, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Rugh et al., “The Relationship Between Elastomer Opacity, Colorimeter Beam Size, and Measured Colorimetric Response”, Nov./Dec. 1991, pp. 569-576, vol. 4, No. 6, The International Journal of Prosthodontics. |
| Ryther et al., “Colorimetric Evaluation of Shade Guide Variability”, 1993, p. 215, J. Dent. Res. 72 (IADR Abstracts) Special Issue. |
| Schwabacher et al., “Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides”, Oct. 1990, pp. 425-431, vol. 64, No. 4, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Seghi et al., “Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems”, Jul. 1986, pp. 35-40, vol. 56, No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Seghi et al., “Visual and Instrumental Colorimetric Assessments of Small Color Differences on Translucent Dental Porcelain”, Dec. 1989, pp. 1760-1764, vol. 68, No. 12, J. Dent. Res. |
| Seghi et al., “Performance Assessment of Colorimetric Devices on Dental Porcelains”, Dec. 1989, pp. 1755-1759, vol. 69, No. 11, J. Dent. Res. |
| Seghi et al., “Effects of Instrument-measuring Geometry on Colorimetric Assessment of Dental Porcelains”, May 1990, pp. 1180-1183, vol. 69, No. 5, J. Dent. Res. |
| Sorensen et al., “Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I: A systematic method for shade determination”, Aug. 1987, pp. 133-139, vol. 58, No. 2, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Sorensen et al., “Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part II: Procedures for visual communication”, Dec. 1987, pp. 669-677, vol. 58, No. 6, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Sproul, “Color matching in dentistry. Part 1: The three-dimensional nature of color”, Apr. 1973, pp. 416-424, vol. 29, No. 4, J. Prosthet. Dent. |
| Sproul, “Color matching in dentistry. Part 1: Color Control”, Feb. 1974, pp. 146-154, vol. 31, No. 2, J. Prosthet. Dent. |
| Sproul, “Color matching in dentistry. Part 2: Practical applications of the organization of color”, May 1973, pp. 556-566, vol. 29, No. 5, J. Prosthet. Dent. |
| Swift et al., “Colormetric Evaluation of Vita Shade Resin Composites”, 1994, pp. 356-361, vol. 7, No. 4, The International Journal of Prosthodontics. |
| van der Burgt et al., “A comparison of new and conventional methods of quantification of tooth color”, Feb. 1990, pp. 155-162, vol. 63, No. 2, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120179406 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13154246 | Jun 2011 | US |
| Child | 13425852 | US |
