This invention relates to the field of artificial joint prostheses and, in particular, to an improved instrument for machining a precise cavity in bone for receiving a prosthesis.
For implantation of prosthetic stems, such as hip stems, accurate preparation of the bone or intramedullary canal is extremely important in order to guarantee good contact between the prosthesis stem and the bone. The underlying concept behind precise preparation is that a precise bone envelope reduces the gaps between the implant (i.e. prosthesis or prosthetic component) and the bone, thereby improving the initial and long-term bone ingrowth/fixation. The bone canal is presently prepared for implantation of a prosthetic stem by drilling and reaming a resected end of a bone, such as a femur, and then preparing an area adjacent the drilled hole to provide a seat for the prosthetic stem or a proximal sleeve coupled to the stem of a modular prosthetic system.
Modular prosthetic systems using proximal sleeves, stems, necks and heads, such as the S-ROM Modular Hip System, available from DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, Ind., put more control in the hands of the surgeon, providing solutions for a variety of surgical scenarios, from primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to the complex revision or DDH challenges. Such system provides such versatility because the provided plurality of stems, sleeves, necks and heads which can be assembled in a large number of configurations.
Preparation of the area adjacent the drilled hole may be accomplished by broaching or by milling. Broaches or rasps, when used for bone preparation, have limitations. One such limitation is the risk of fracture during broaching. Since broaching is done by pounding the broach into the bone, the bone tends to fracture. Additionally, both broaches and rasps suffer from a tendency to be deflected by harder sections of bone so that they do not create as precise a triangular cavity as can be created by a miller system. In a study that compared an intimate fill with robotically machined femoral, Paul et al., found that broaching tore the trabecular bone, whereas femoral canal preparation with reamers was consistently more accurate. Paul, H. A., et al. “Development of a Surgical Robot for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.” Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 285 December, 1992: 57-66.
Thus, milling is currently the preferred method of bone preparation in many orthopaedic applications because it is an extremely precise method of bone preparation. A limitation of milling systems today is that they are typically formed so that the drive shaft extends at an angle relative to the remainder of the frame from the end of the miller cutter machining the bone. A fairly large incision must be made to accommodate such milling assemblies. A typical incision for preparing a femur for a total prosthetic hip replacement using a standard triangle miller system is eight to ten inches long. It is not uncommon for incisions as large as 12 inches to be used in a total hip replacement procedure.
A standard triangle miller system typically includes a miller shell, a miller frame and a miller cutter having an end formed for coupling to a drill. A typical miller frame and miller cutter can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,694 issued to DeCarlo, Jr. et al. on Jul. 30, 1996. This miller frame allows for precise machining of the triangular canal by a miller cutter held at an angle with respect to the shaft of the frame. The triangular canal facilitates an accurate fit of a proximal sleeve that distributes the load experienced by the prosthesis evenly and provides rotational stability. However, to accommodate this miller, it is necessary to make a fairly large incision which may be undesirable for cosmetic or other reasons.
The large incision is required because the miller cutter includes a fixed input shaft for connecting to and/or receiving motive (i.e. rotary) power from a drill or similar instrument. As such, the prior reamer is able to accept rotary input power with respect to only one direction. Typically, this direction is at 0° (i.e. “straight on”) with respect to the reamer which is approximately thirty two degrees with respect to the shaft of the miller frame. Therefore, not only is the input power direction restricted, but this, in turn, restricts the angle at which the reamer may be used on a patient. Since the input shaft and the drill coupled thereto extend laterally beyond the edge of the miller frame an incision substantially larger than the width of the frame must be made to accommodate the reamer, frame and drill during surgery. The incision must be large enough to accommodate the reamer, frame, input shaft and drill without the input shaft engaging soft tissue.
Recently, there have been some millers developed for minimally invasive surgery, however, they still require an incision of about three inches. However, as other instruments only require about one and a half to two inches, it is not ideal to use a miller that requires a larger incision.
In view of the above, it would be desirable to have a bone miller or guided reamer that could fit into a smaller incision during a surgical process.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a miller assembly for creating a cavity in a bone is provided. The cavity has a cross section which has a generally triangular profile having a first side generally parallel with an axis of the bone and a second side forming an acute angle with the first side, and is contiguous with a pre-existing conical cavity in the bone. The assembly includes a cutter and a frame for carrying the cutter. The frame includes a connection portion having a longitudinal axis and a cutter mount for mounting the cutter at a first angle approximating the acute angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the connection portion. The cutter mount extends at the first angle from the longitudinal axis of the connection portion and is configured to receive a portion of the cutter and maintain the received cutter oriented at the first angle during rotation. The frame further includes a handle configured to form a portion of a drive joint for coupling the frame to a drill, the handle having a longitudinal axis. The longitudinal axis of the handle is coincident with the longitudinal axis of the frame.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a miller assembly for creating a cavity in a bone is provided. The system includes a cutter and a frame for carrying the cutter. The frame has a longitudinal axis and a cutter mount for mounting the cutter at a first angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the frame. The cutter mount extends at the first angle from the longitudinal axis of the frame and is configured to receive a portion of the cutter and to maintain the received cutter oriented at the first angle during rotation. The frame further includes a handle configured to form a portion of a drive joint for coupling the frame to a drill having a longitudinal axis. The handle has a longitudinal axis, such that the longitudinal axis of the handle is coincident with the longitudinal axis of the frame. The cutter is coupled to the connection portion and handle such that when the drill is activated, the cutter rotates.
According to yet another embodiment of the present application, a method of milling a calcar region of the femur is provided. The method including providing a miller assembly including a cutter and a frame for carrying the cutter. The frame has a longitudinal axis and a cutter mount for mounting the cutter at a first angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the frame. The cutter mount extends at the first angle from the longitudinal axis of the frame and is configured to receive a portion of the cutter and to maintain the received cutter oriented at the first angle during rotation. The frame further includes a handle configured to form a portion of a drive joint for coupling the frame to a drill, the handle having a longitudinal axis. The handle is coupled to the drill. The miller assembly is inserted into the femur such that the cutter is located in the calcar region. The drill is then operated, causing the cutter to rotate and mill bone in the calcar region
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. Like reference characters tend to indicate like parts throughout the several views.
Embodiments of the present invention and the advantages thereof are best understood by referring to the following descriptions and drawings, wherein like numerals are used for like and corresponding parts of the drawings.
The disclosed calcar miller assembly 10 allows a surgeon to machine (mill) bone through a smaller incision compared to existing surgical instruments. As shown in
Turning now to
The connection-portion end 32 of the handle 24 includes a gear 36 that will couple with a gear 38 of the connection portion 26, as will be described in more detail below. The connection-portion end 32 of the handle 24 also includes a rod 40, for connecting the handle 24 to the connection portion 26. The rod 40 includes a locking mechanism 42 that corresponds to a locking mechanism 44 (shown in phantom) on the connection portion 26. The rod and connection portion locking mechanisms 42, 44 may include a recess on one and an internal ridge on the other. Other locking mechanisms, including, but not limited to, threads, tapers, locking bulbs, and locking tabs, may be used. Also, the pieces may be welded together.
Also, in other embodiments, the rod 40 may be located on the connection portion 26. The rod 40 would engage a cavity in the handle 24.
The connection portion 26 includes a handle-connection end 46 and a shaft-connection end 48. The handle-connection end 46 couples to the handle 24 as described above. The handle-connection end 46 includes an outwardly extending flange 50. The flange 50 includes a recess 52 for receiving the gear 38. The gear 38 couples to a lower gear 54 via a thread 56 on the gear 38 that matingly engages an internal thread 58 (as shown in phantom) on the lower gear 54. The miller cutter 14 slides onto a cutter mount, or an outwardly extending pole 60. The pole 60 extends at the desired angle α as described and shown above in reference to
The shaft-connection end 48 of the connection portion 26 includes a locking mechanism 64 for locking the connection portion 26 to the shaft 28. As shown, the locking mechanism 64 includes a recess 66 which will engage an internal ridge 68 (shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the shaft 28 will be connected to a miller shell (not shown). The handle 24 and connection portion 26 will slide into the miller shell. The handle 24/connection portion 26 can be moved up and down relative to the miller shell in order to adjust the depth of the drilling.
Returning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
In some embodiments, the miller 10 can be inserted into a miller shell (not shown). The miller shell is inserted into the femur and the miller 10 can be adjusted vertically so as to adjust the cutting depth.
Turning now to
In some embodiments, the miller cutter assembly 10 is made of stainless steel or other biocompatible metal, such as titanium or cobalt chrome. Any other sterilizable metal may be used. In other embodiments, the handle 24, connection portion 26, and pilot shaft may be disposable and made of a biocompatible plastic such as polycarbonate, LEXAN®, ULTEM®, both manufactured by Sabic Innovation Plastics of Houston, Tex., CELCON®, manufactured by Ticona of Florence, Ky., UDEL®, RADEL®, ACUDEL®, MINDEL®, Epispire, Primospire, TORLON®, all manufactured by Solvay Plastics of Brussels, or any other biocompatible plastic, while the miller cutter 14 is made of stainless steel or other sterilizable metal.
In the embodiments shown and described in reference to
In the above described embodiments, the frame 12 was in three parts. However, in alternative embodiments, the frame may be a single piece or may have more or less than three parts.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein, other embodiments may be perceived by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims. For example, although the invention has been described in terms of the implantation of the femoral portion of a hip prosthesis, it can be used with prostheses for other joints such as the shoulder, knee, or elbow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
650795 | Maxwell | May 1900 | A |
1029402 | Ritter | Jun 1912 | A |
3177507 | Becker et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3633583 | Fishbein | Jan 1972 | A |
3810312 | Carson | May 1974 | A |
4004581 | Heimke et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4116200 | Braun et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4473070 | Matthews | Sep 1984 | A |
4658808 | Link | Apr 1987 | A |
4716894 | Lazzeri | Jan 1988 | A |
4738256 | Freeman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4777942 | Frey et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4917530 | Engelhardt | Apr 1990 | A |
4969911 | Greene | Nov 1990 | A |
5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
5002581 | Paxson | Mar 1991 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5047033 | Fallin | Sep 1991 | A |
5053037 | Lackey | Oct 1991 | A |
5100407 | Conrad | Mar 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson | Aug 1992 | A |
5171244 | Caspari et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192283 | Ling et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197989 | Hinckfuss | Mar 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5207680 | Dietz | May 1993 | A |
5228459 | Caspari et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5263498 | Caspari et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5304181 | Caspari et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
D346979 | Stalcup et al. | May 1994 | S |
5336226 | McDaniel | Aug 1994 | A |
5342363 | Richelsoph | Aug 1994 | A |
5344423 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5370706 | Bolesky | Dec 1994 | A |
5372209 | Raihert | Dec 1994 | A |
5387218 | Meswania | Feb 1995 | A |
5395376 | Caspari et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
D357315 | Dietz | Apr 1995 | S |
5403320 | Luman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415659 | Lee | May 1995 | A |
5468243 | Halpern | Nov 1995 | A |
5470336 | Ling et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474559 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486180 | Dietz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496324 | Barnes | Mar 1996 | A |
5507815 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5507830 | DeMane | Apr 1996 | A |
5507833 | Bohn | Apr 1996 | A |
5527316 | Stone | Jun 1996 | A |
5534005 | Tokish, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540694 | DeCarlo, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5569255 | Burke | Oct 1996 | A |
5593411 | Stalcup et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601563 | Burke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601567 | Swajger | Feb 1997 | A |
5607269 | Dowd et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607431 | Dudasik | Mar 1997 | A |
5643271 | Sederholm et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645607 | Hickey | Jul 1997 | A |
5653714 | Dietz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658349 | Brooks | Aug 1997 | A |
5683395 | Mikhail | Nov 1997 | A |
5697932 | Smith | Dec 1997 | A |
5702487 | Averill | Dec 1997 | A |
5728128 | Crickenberger | Mar 1998 | A |
5743915 | Bertin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752972 | Hoogeboom | May 1998 | A |
5755803 | Haines et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766261 | Neal | Jun 1998 | A |
5769855 | Bertin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776200 | Johnson | Jul 1998 | A |
5792143 | Samuelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5810827 | Haines et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810829 | Elliott | Sep 1998 | A |
5810830 | Noble | Sep 1998 | A |
5853415 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858020 | Johnson | Jan 1999 | A |
5860969 | White | Jan 1999 | A |
5860981 | Bertin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876459 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879354 | Haines et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879391 | Slamin | Mar 1999 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
5908423 | Kashuba et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919195 | Wilson | Jul 1999 | A |
5935172 | Ochoa | Aug 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
5957925 | Cook et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968049 | Rold | Oct 1999 | A |
5976145 | Kennefick, III | Nov 1999 | A |
5976147 | LaSalle | Nov 1999 | A |
5976188 | Dextradeur | Nov 1999 | A |
5993455 | Noble | Nov 1999 | A |
6045556 | Cohen | Apr 2000 | A |
6056754 | Haines et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071311 | O'Neil | Jun 2000 | A |
6080162 | Dye | Jun 2000 | A |
6090146 | Rozow, III | Jul 2000 | A |
6117138 | Burrows | Sep 2000 | A |
6120507 | Allard et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126694 | Gray, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162226 | DeCarlo, Jr. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179877 | Burke | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193759 | Ro | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197064 | Haines et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197065 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206884 | Masini | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224605 | Anderson | May 2001 | B1 |
6238435 | Meulink | May 2001 | B1 |
6258093 | Edwards | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258095 | Lombardo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258097 | Cook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270502 | Stulberg | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287342 | Copf et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318651 | Spiering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319286 | Fernandez | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332886 | Green | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355068 | Doubler | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361563 | Terrill Grisoni | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6432110 | Richelsoph | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432141 | Stocks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440139 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6508841 | Martin | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517581 | Blamey | Feb 2003 | B2 |
RE38058 | Fallin | Apr 2003 | E |
6589285 | Penenberg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6663616 | Roth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676706 | Mears et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692530 | Doubler | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702854 | Cheal | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6740090 | Cragg | May 2004 | B1 |
6770100 | Draenert | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6824552 | Robison | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846314 | Shapira | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6875218 | Dye | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6949101 | McCleary et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7001392 | McGovern | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008420 | Okada | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7074224 | Daniels | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7641658 | Shaolian | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20010001121 | Lombardo | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007957 | Martin | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016779 | Lubinus | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034526 | Kuslich | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020183758 | Middleton | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030093080 | Brown | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109882 | Shirado | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114933 | Bouttens | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130740 | Stocks et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171756 | Fallin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171816 | Scifert | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187449 | McCleary et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204269 | Gerbec | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220698 | Mears et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015239 | Le Beguec | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054419 | Serra | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064186 | McCleary | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092951 | Serra et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122437 | Dwyer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122440 | Daniels | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122525 | Daniels | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147933 | McGovern | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172138 | May | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267266 | Daniels | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267267 | Daniels | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267372 | Vanasse | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004679 | Sederholm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050154331 | Christie et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050222572 | Chana | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234461 | Burdulis | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015110 | Pepper | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3538654 | Apr 1987 | DE |
0206777 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0661023 | Dec 1994 | EP |
1084680 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0726063 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0595956 | Sep 1998 | EP |
861635 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0511244 | Oct 1998 | EP |
861635 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1201191 | May 2002 | EP |
861635 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1263334 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1348384 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1323395 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1369089 | Dec 2003 | EP |
0842639 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1493407 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1263334 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1591084 | Nov 2005 | EP |
2737107 | Jan 1997 | FR |
2828397 | Feb 2003 | FR |
2250441 | Jun 1992 | GB |
03339724 | Dec 2003 | JP |
WO9110408 | Jul 1991 | WO |
WO9210138 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9301769 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO9412123 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9427507 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9815739 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO02102254 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03015642 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03065906 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03082159 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03092513 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03094698 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03094803 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100082031 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |