Minimally invasive implant and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11547542
  • Patent Number
    11,547,542
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 11, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 10, 2023
    2 years ago
Abstract
Apparatus and methods are provided for treating urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and other pelvic defects or dysfunctions, in both males and females, using one or more lateral implants to reinforce the supportive tissue of the urethra. The implants can be configured as a sling device having at least one extension arm and a tissue support portion having an eyelet, wherein a portion of the at least one extension arm is adapted to slide through and adjustably attach with the eyelet.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to apparatus, tools and methods for treating pelvic conditions by providing and using one or more pelvic implants to support pelvic tissue.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It has been reported that over 13 million American men and women of all ages suffer from urinary and fecal incontinence. The social implications for an incontinent patient include loss of self-esteem, embarrassment, restriction of social and sexual activities, isolation, depression and, in some instances, dependence on caregivers. Incontinence is the most common reason for institutionalization of the elderly.


The urinary system consists of the kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra. The bladder is a hollow, muscular, balloon-shaped sac that serves as a storage container for urine. The bladder is located behind the pubic bone and is protected by the pelvis. Ligaments hold the bladder in place and connect it to the pelvis and other tissue. FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the relevant female anatomy. The urethra 16 is the tube that passes urine from the bladder 14 out of the body. The narrow, internal opening of the urethra 16 within the bladder 14 is the bladder neck 18. In this region, the bladder's bundled muscular fibers transition into a sphincteric striated muscle called the internal sphincter. FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the relevant male anatomy. The urethra 16 extends from the bladder neck 18 to the end of the penis 22. The male urethra 16 is composed of three portions: the prostatic, bulbar and pendulus portions. The prostatic portion is the widest part of the tube, which passes through the prostate gland 24. FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the anatomy of the anus and rectum. The rectum 1 is the most distal portion of the gastrointestinal tract. The exterior opening of the rectum is the anus 2. Fecal continence is related to control of the exterior sphincter 3 and interior sphincter 4 of the anus.


Urinary incontinence may occur when the muscles of the urinary system are injured, malfunction or are weakened. Other factors, such as trauma to the urethral area, neurological injury, hormonal imbalance or medication side-effects, may also cause or contribute to incontinence. There are five basic types of incontinence: stress incontinence, urge incontinence, mixed incontinence, overflow incontinence, and functional incontinence. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the involuntary loss of urine that occurs due to sudden increases in intraabdominal pressure resulting from activities such as coughing, sneezing, lifting, straining, exercise and, in severe cases, even simply changing body position. Urge incontinence, also termed “hyperactive bladder” “frequency/urgency syndrome” or “irritable bladder,” occurs when an individual experiences the immediate need to urinate and loses bladder control before reaching the toilet. Mixed incontinence is the most common form of urinary incontinence. Inappropriate bladder contractions and weakened sphincter muscles usually cause this type of incontinence. Mixed incontinence is a combination of the symptoms for both stress and urge incontinence. Overflow incontinence is a constant dripping or leakage of urine caused by an overfilled bladder. Functional incontinence results when a person has difficulty moving from one place to another. It is generally caused by factors outside the lower urinary tract, such as deficits in physical function and/or cognitive function.


SUI is generally thought to be related to hypermobility of the bladder neck or an intrinsic urethral sphincter defect. A variety of treatment options are currently available to treat incontinence. Some of these treatment options include external devices, behavioral therapy (such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, or Kegal exercises), injectable materials, prosthetic devices and/or surgery. Depending on age, medical condition, and personal preference, surgical procedures can be used to completely restore continence.


Conservative management of SUI can include lifestyle changes, such as weight loss, smoking cessation, and modification of intake of diuretic fluids such as coffee and alcohol. With regard to surgical treatments, the purported “gold standard” is the Burch Colposuspension in which the bladder neck is suspended. Mid-urethral slings have been similarly effective. One type of procedure, found to be an especially successful treatment option for SUI in both men and women, is a sling and support procedure.


A sling procedure is a surgical method involving the placement of a sling to stabilize or support the bladder neck or urethra. There are a variety of different sling procedures. Slings used for pubovaginal procedures differ in the type of material and anchoring methods. In some cases, the sling is placed under the bladder neck and secured via suspension structures or sutures to a point of attachment (e.g., tissue or bone) through an abdominal and/or vaginal incision.


Although serious complications associated with sling procedures are infrequent, they can occur. Complications for certain sling procedures may include urethral obstruction, development of de nova urge incontinence, hemorrhage, prolonged urinary retention, infection, damage to surrounding tissue and erosion.


Fecal incontinence, like urinary incontinence, has proven to be challenging to treat. Patients whose fecal incontinence is caused by external anal sphincter injury is treated surgically, as with a sphincteroplasty. Other patients, though, are considered to have neurogenic or idiopathic fecal incontinence, and efforts to treat these patients has been less successful. Various procedures, such as postanal repair, total pelvic floor repair, muscle transposition techniques, dynamic graciloplasty, artificial sphincter procedures, and sacral nerve stimulation. Success has been limited, and the various treatment modalities can result in morbidity.


There is a desire for a minimally invasive yet highly effective treatment modality that can be used with minimal to no side effects for the treatment of both urinary and fecal incontinence. Further, the method of treatment should also improve the quality of life for patients.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention can include surgical instruments, implantable articles, and methods for urological applications, particularly for the treatment of stress and/or urge urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and prolapse and perinea! floor repairs. As noted, the usual treatments for SUI include placing a sling to either compress the urethral sphincter or to elevate or support the neck of the bladder defects.


Embodiments of the present invention can include apparatus and methods for treating urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and other pelvic defects or dysfunctions, in both males and females using one or more lateral implants to reinforce the supportive tissue of the urethra. The implants are configured to engage and pull (e.g., pull up) lateral urethral support (e.g., endopelvic fascia) tissue to cause the sub-urethral tissue to tighten and provide slack reduction for improved support. As such, the implants of such embodiments can be utilized to eliminate the need for mesh or other supportive structures under the urethra that is common with other incontinence slings. The implants can be shaped to facilitate such support, e.g., provided with anchoring end portions or configurable in “U,” “V” or like shapes. Further, one or more anchors or tissue engagement portions can be employed to attach and stabilize the implants to the tissue. Other embodiments of the present invention can include a supportive sling implant having one or more arm portions and a tensioning rod. Such embodiments can be provided in a traditional supportive configuration under the urethra, or laterally positioning with respect to the urethra, as described herein. In various such embodiments, the sling can include a tissue support portion having a first eyelet and a second eyelet, a first extension arm, and a second extension arm. The first extension arm can include an anchor portion and an opposing end adjustment element, with at least a length of the first extension arm adapted to slide through the first eyelet of the tissue support portion. Similarly, the second extension arm can include an anchor portion and an opposing end adjustment element, with at least a length of the first extension arm adapted to slide through the second eyelet of the tissue support portion.


The support portion can be included with one of the extension arms to provide a two-piece construct. For instance, the first extension arm and its corresponding support portion can include the eyelet and an anchoring portion. The second arm extension can slidably engage with the eyelet to define the elongate sling. Alternatively, the support portion can be a separate element of a three-piece construct. As such, the support portion for such embodiments can include two or more eyelets. Two separate extension arms can be included with such embodiments (e.g., each with anchors and adjustment elements), with each extension arm adapted to slidably engage with a respective eyelet of the separate support portion.


Certain embodiments of the implant or sling can include one or more indicia to assist in deployment, adjustment and tensioning of the implant or sling.


Embodiments of the present invention can provide smaller implants, fewer implant components, thus reducing the size and number of incisions, improving implant manipulation and adjustment, and the complexity of the insertion and deployment steps.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of the female urinary system.



FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of the male urinary system.



FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of the anatomy of the anus and rectum.



FIG. 4 shows a pelvic implant device in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 5 shows an introducer or insertion device capable of use with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows a generally U-shaped pelvic implant device m accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows an anchor of a pelvic implant device in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows a side view of the pelvic implant device anchor of FIG. 7.



FIG. 9 shows a pelvic implant device having anchoring members along a portion of the extension portion in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 10 shows an anchoring pelvic implant device in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 11 shows a pelvic implant device having a multi-barbed anchor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 12-15 show various pelvic implant devices with a leading anchor and a trailing base or bulk anchor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 16 shows the implantation of pelvic implant devices in the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 17 schematically shows the implantation of U-shaped pelvic implant devices in the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 18 schematically shows the implantation of U-shaped pelvic implant devices in the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 19 schematically shows the implantation of implant devices, having leading anchor and trailing bulk anchors, to provide tensioning support for the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 20-21 schematically show the implantation of implant devices, having leading anchor and trailing bulk anchors, to provide tensioning support for the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 22-23 schematically show the implantation of implant devices through the obturator and into the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 24-25 schematically show the retropubic implantation of implant devices to provide tensioning support for the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 26 shows an implant device having a toggle bolt anchor selectively engaged with an introducer device in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 27 shows implant devices having a toggle bolt anchor and a tubular base anchor in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 28 schematically shows the implantation of the implant devices of FIG. 27 to provide support of the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 29 shows an implant device having a toggle bolt anchor, a tubular base anchor, and an intermediate urethral cradling portion in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 30 shows a tubular implant device of device portion m accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 31 shows an implant device having a tubular portion and a generally flat portion in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 32 schematically shows implantation of a tubular and/or flat implant device to provide tensioning support for the lateral urethral support tissue in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 33 shows an implant device having a first arm and a second arm in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 34 schematically shows implantation of the implant device of FIG. 33 along a retropubic pathway in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 35 schematically shows implantation of the implant device of FIG. 33 along a transobturator pathway in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 36 shows an implant device having a first arm portions and second arm in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 37 schematically shows implantation of the implant device of FIG. 36 along a retropubic pathway in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 38 schematically shows implantation of the implant device of FIG. 36 along a transobturator pathway in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 39 shows an implant device having arm portions and adjustment indicia in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 40-41 show slidable adjustment of the implant device of FIG. 39 in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring generally to FIGS. 1-41, like reference numerals can designate identical, similar or corresponding parts throughout the views. The following description is meant to be illustrative only, and not limiting other embodiments of this invention that will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of this description. One aspect of the present invention is an apparatus and method of treating urinary incontinence in males or females. In various embodiments, one or more implants or implant members are placed in strategically located positions to pull up or otherwise tighten tissue and/or muscle lateral to the urethra to generally re-establish the original anatomical structure of the patient. Various systems, devices, structures, techniques and methods, alone or in combination, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,911,003, 6,612,977, 6,802,807, 2002/0161382, 2004/0039453 and 2008/0045782, and International PCT Publication No. 2008/057261, can be employed with the present invention, with the above-identified disclosures being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The devices or structures described herein can be employed or introduced into the pelvic region of the patient transvaginally, percutaneously or in any other manner known by those of ordinary skill in the art.


Various embodiments of the present invention can include a tensioning or support implant device 30 having an extension portion 32 and one or more engagement portions 34, as shown in FIG. 4. The one or more engagement portions can include a first anchor 34a at a first or leading end of the tensioning device 30, with a second anchor 34b provided at an opposite trailing end of the device 30. The extension portion 32 can be constructed of a compatible mesh or like porous material known for use and compatibility with urethral slings, other pelvic support devices, and the like. The mesh material can facilitate the infiltration of tissue and cells within the extension portion 32 to promote tissue in-growth and, in turn, fixation of the device 30 to the surrounding anatomical structure. The extension portion 32 can also include protrusions, serrated edges, extending fibers, or similar structural features to promote tissue fixation and ingrowth. In other embodiments, the extension portion 32 can be constructed of a flexible, or semi-rigid, length of a compatible generally non-porous material. The length and flexibility of the device 30 and corresponding extension portion 32 can vary greatly depending on the particular procedure and anatomical support application. The extension portion 32 can be generally planar at introduction, pre-shaped or pre-formed, or otherwise configured to allow for adaptation, manipulation and shaping during the implantation procedure. Various embodiments of the extension portion 32 can be capable of forming into a generally V-shaped or U-shaped device (FIG. 6), or otherwise adapted for flexible or selective manipulation and traversal through, around and/or along various tissue and muscles of the pelvic region. In certain embodiments, the length of the device 30 can range from 0.5 to 6 cm. It is also possible to have lengths greater than or less than 0.5 to 6 cm.


In certain embodiments, the implant can be constructed in the form of a collapsible synthetic mesh patch, and can include an adhesive covering (e.g., fibron glue). Further, an umbrella-like feature can be included with wire splines or members extending from the patch. The umbrella-like feature can be connected with the patch via a connection structure, such as a ring, fastener, etc. A portion of the implant introducer (e.g., plunger and/or wire) can be configured to advance the patch and deploy and/or expand the umbrella-like feature to provide tissue engagement for the patch.


The one or more engagement portions 34 can be configured as fixating, or self-fixating, tips or anchors 34 adapted for penetration and fixation within target tissue or muscle (T) of the pelvic region. As shown in FIGS. 4, 6 and 7-11, the anchors 34 can vary in shape, size and placement along the device 30. For instance, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 6, the anchors 34 can be integrated, attached or otherwise provided proximate the ends of the extension portion 32. The extension portion 32 can be connected to the anchors 34 via an end portion 36 of the anchors 34. A myriad of attachment structures or techniques can be utilized to connect the ends of the extension portion 32 to the end portion 36 of the anchors 34. Further, the anchors 34 can include opposing tines or barbs 38 to facilitate penetration and fixation within the target tissue. Other embodiments, such as those depicted in FIGS. 9-11, can include one or more tines 38 provided along portions of the extension portion 32 (FIG. 9), or a plurality of barbs 38 disposed along the anchors 34 (FIG. 11). Moreover, the one or more engagement portions 34 can be configured as toggle bolt anchors (FIG. 26), tubular members, planar members, bulbous members and the like, any of which can be constructed of compatible polymers, metals, mesh or non-porous materials, or bio-absorbable or non-absorbable materials. As depicted and described herein, the engagement portions 34 can be adapted to engage various target tissue regions, including the endopelvic fascia, the rectus fascia/muscle, the obturator muscle, and other anatomical structures of the pelvis.


In addition, a sheath or sleeve 40 can be selectively provided along a length of the extension portion 32 to facilitate introduction and insertion of the device 30 within the pelvic region of the patient, as depicted in FIG. 10. One or more insertion or introduction devices 42 can be employed to facilitate traversal of the device 30 within the pelvic region, and to facilitate deployment of the device 30 (e.g., anchors 34) into the target tissue location. Various known insertion devices 42 can be utilized, including those disclosed in the previously-incorporated patent references. A needle embodiment of the device 42 can include a handle, a tubular member 43 (straight or curved), and a tip 45 adapted for selective engagement with one or more components of the implants disclosed herein. As depicted in FIG. 10, the extension portion 32 can include a plurality of fibrous material or strands 44 adapted to further promote tissue ingrowth and fixation.


As detailed herein, various embodiments of the present invention are configured to treat urinary incontinence by providing support to the tissue or anatomical structure proximate or surrounding the urethra, rather than providing more conventional hammock-like support under the urethra. The device 30 and engagement aspects of the invention for such embodiments can vary greatly, as detailed herein.


As shown in FIGS. 12-15, the device 30 can include the barbed anchor 34 at a leading end of the extension portion 32 and a bulk base member 50 at the opposite trailing end. The extension portion 32 can be constructed of a mesh material (FIG. 12), or another porous or nonporous material (FIGS. 14-15). Further, the base member 50 can be mesh, or another porous or non-porous material, and can take on any variety of shapes, including planar, bulbous, tubular, etc. The base member 50 can be integrated with the extension portion 32, attached using fasteners 52 (e.g., rivet), bonded, or otherwise attached utilizing known structures and techniques. In other embodiments, the extension portion 32 can be made of random fibers, or a weaved, braided, twisted, or knitted polymer material.


As depicted in FIG. 16, the device 30 can be inserted along a path generally toward the obturator foramen for penetration through the endopelvic fascia (EF) on either or both sides of the urethra 16. As such, the anchors 34 are positioned for fixation with tissue or muscle proximate the fascia so that the base member 50 is disposed on the entry side of the fascia. The base member 50 of each device 30 can be sized and shaped such that it remains on the entry side of the fascia and can include one or more anchors, protrusions or similar structures to provide additional engagement and retention against the fascia. The anchors 34 are advanced and positioned to penetrate through or otherwise engage with selective target tissue such that the laterally extending sub-urethral tissue, such as the endopelvic fascia, is pulled upward to remove slack and relocate the fascia and/or urethra to a more optimal and correct anatomical position. Other adjustment mechanisms and techniques can also be used to raise the fascia to provide the desired tightening or slack reduction in the laterally extending urethral support tissue. The devices 30 of FIGS. 14-15 function in the same manner, except that the extension portion 32 and base members 50 can assume different design configurations and can be constructed of different materials, such as relatively stiff or flexible polymers, mesh, non-porous mesh and other known compatible materials.


Structures or portions of the various embodiments detailed herein can be constructed of materials such as polypropylene, polyglycolide, poly-1-lactides, or other known biodegradable (re-absorbable) or non-biodegradable polymers. Further, growth factors or stem cells can be seeded or otherwise provided with one or more of the components of the device 30 to facilitate healing or tissue in-growth. In addition to introduction and deployment of the device 30 with a needle introducer device, a cannula or catheter system can be utilized as well.


The embodiment of FIGS. 16-17 includes an implant device 30 having the extension portion 32 and one or more engagement or anchor portions 34 provided at an end region of the extension portion 32. The device 30 can be designed with a level of flexibility allowing a user to easily direct and advance the device 30 and to allow for manipulation of the device 30 into a generally U-shaped or similar configuration during deployment and anchoring. In one embodiment, the device 30 is adapted to generally augment the lateral tissue of the supportive pelvic floor of the patient. For instance, a first of the anchors 34a can be inserted through the endopelvic fascia for fixation within tissue. As such, the other anchor 34b can be adjusted or pulled to tighten and raise the supportive urethral tissue. One or more of the anchors 34a, 34b can be fixated to tissue near or at the obturator internus muscle or obturator membrane. Upon pulling the support tissue up to generally obtain the correct anatomical urethral support, the second anchor is fixated within the proximate tissue, with the bend of the extension portion 32 extending through the fascia. This process can be repeated for the supportive tissue on the other side of the urethra to provide bilateral augmentation and support.



FIG. 18 shows an embodiment of the device 30 having a first anchor 34a and a second anchor 34b, with the portion 32 extending therebetween. The anchors 34a, 34b can be configured in accordance with the various designs disclosed herein. For example, the first anchor 34a can be a penetrating tip, with the second anchor 34a be shaped as a tubular or bulk anchor. One of the anchors can be fixated in tissue above the fascia and the other of the anchors secured at, near or through the fascia to pull the supportive urethral tissue up to eliminate slack in the tissue. This process can be repeated on the other side of the urethra to provide bilateral augmentation and support. Embodiments of the extension portion 32 can be constructed of mesh, or braided, twisted, knitted, tubular, or collagen matrix materials to facilitate fixation and tissue in-growth. Further, a plurality of such devices 30 can be implanted on either or both sides of the urethra to promote tissue augmentation and support.



FIGS. 20-21 show certain embodiments of the present invention and devices 30 similar to that depicted in FIG. 16. The bulk anchor 34b (e.g., tubular, toggle (FIG. 26), flat, etc.) can be inserted through the supportive tissue, such as the endopelvic fascia, or it can reside under the supportive tissue, with the anchor 34a extending up through the tissue. As such, either of the anchors 34a, 34b can be positioned on the opposite side of the supportive tissue. Further, at least one of the anchors can serve to penetrate the supportive tissue at one or more locations along the tissue. For instance, certain embodiments of the device 30 can be utilized to weave or thread in and out of, and along, the tissue to provide a supportive undulating layout for the extension portion 32. This can facilitate attachment, better distribute pulling force on or along the tissue, and provide like support benefits.


As shown in FIGS. 22-23, an outside-in implant approach can be employed for the device 30. Namely, a skin incision just inferior to where the adductor longus inserts into the pubic ramus can be created. Then, a first anchor 34a of the device 30 can be passed around the ischiopubic ramus and inserted through the obturator foramen and internus muscle and into the tissue lateral to the urethra, e.g., endopelvic fascia that supports the bladder neck and urethra. Once fixated, the device 30 can be pulled to provide tension along the extension portion 32 to augment and return the urethral support tissue to a correct anatomical position. At that point, the proximal opposing end of the device 30 and extension portion 32 can be anchored or otherwise positioned to maintain the tension on the device 30. Any of the needle and/or cannula introducer devices described herein can be employed to insert and deploy the device 30 within the patient. Such an embodiment of the device 30 can provide easier access and patient positioning, can eliminate the need for dissection under the urethra, and can be implanted while the patient is awake such that the device 30 can be selectively adjusted based on indications and movement of the patient. Embodiments of the base or end of the extension portion 32 on the entry side of the tissue could also be glued, sutured or otherwise fixated in or at the tissue using various known structures and techniques. Again, the device 30 can be implanted on either side of the urethra to provide bilateral support. FIG. 23 discloses a variation on this embodiment, with the extension portion 32 being constructed of a non-porous material, such as a suture, polymer material, string, etc.



FIGS. 24-25 depict another embodiment of the implant device 30, introduced along a retropubic path, rather than a transobturator path. One or more skin incisions are generally created such that the device 30 can extend down on either, or both sides of the urethra, with at least one anchor 34 extending into the endopelvic fascia to the anterior vaginal wall. Like the other embodiments disclosed herein, fixation of the implant device 30 to the lateral supporting tissue of the urethra permits adjustment to return the supportive tissue to its correct anatomical position. Again, any of the anchors 34, extension portions 32 and introducer devices described herein can be employed with the embodiment of FIGS. 24-25.



FIGS. 27-29 show various embodiments of the implant device 30 including engagement or anchoring portions 34a, 34b at each end of the extension portion 32 to provide lateral support of the urethra. The anchors can include any of the structures or features described herein. For example, one embodiment includes a toggle anchor 34a and a tubular (e.g., mesh) base anchor 34b. The tubular base 34b can include cap or other structure 35 provided at its ends. Like other embodiments of device 30, at least one of the anchors, such as tubular base 34b, can be engaged with lateral support tissue of the urethra such that the tissue can be tensioned or raised to remove slack. An adjustment member 60, e.g., rod, suture or like feature, can be included to provide selective adjustment of the device 30 to further facilitate tension control. For those embodiments including tubular engagement features 34b, the features 34b can be of a mesh construction to promote tissue fixation and in-growth. As shown in FIG. 29, this embodiment of the device 30 can further include an intermediate support 62 adapted for positioning under the urethra to provide additional support. The support 62 can be porous or non-porous, and any of the structures (e.g., anchors 34, support 62) can be constructed of re-absorbable or non-absorbable materials.



FIGS. 30-32 depict implants 70 capable of fixation along a portion of the lateral urethral support tissue, e.g., the endopelvic fascia. These implants 70 can include one or more tubular and/or flat mesh structures 72 adapted for engagement with the support tissue to provide adjustment with and/or tension on the tissue. The structures 70, 72 can also be adapted for selective engagement with an introducer device 42 to facilitate insertion and deployment. The implants can be provided without anchors 34, wherein the construct and features (e.g., protrusions, mesh, abrasions, adhesives, fibers, etc.) of the implant can provide the attachment structures necessary to engage with and provide adjustable tension on the support tissue. Other embodiments can include anchors 34 to penetrate or engage the lateral tissue. Further, the implants 70 can be constructed of re-absorbable or non-absorbable materials.


The embodiments of FIGS. 33-38 can include an implant device 80 having a first extension arm 82, a second extension arm 84, and an adjustment member 86 provided with one or both of the extension arms 82, 84. The extension arms 82, 84 can include one or more anchors 88 at their respective ends. The arms 82, 84 can be constructed of a porous mesh, or other materials as described herein for the extension portion 32 of devices 30. Similarly, the anchors 88 can assume the configuration of any of the anchors 34 described herein. Components of the device 80, including the arms and adjustment member, can be constructed of compatible materials such as polypropylene, PGA, PLLA, mesh, braids, ropes, filaments, and the like.


Each of the arms 82, 84 (e.g., distinct or separate members) can be passed through one or more vaginal incisions, along a retropubic pathway, until the anchor 88 is secured in tissue, such as the rectus fascia/muscle, as shown in FIGS. 34 and 37. Further, a portion of either arm can extend under the urethra to provide cradling support (e.g., 82 or 82b). To tension the device 80, the member 86 (e.g., rod or polymer extension) of one or both of the arms 82, 84 can be inserted or engaged with an attachment or locking mechanism 90 (e.g., fastener, device, aperture, etc.) of the other arm or implant portion. The member 86 can then be slid along or through the locking mechanism 90 to engage the components until an appropriate tension is obtained. The remaining portion of the member 86 extending below the arms can be cut off and discarded. In other embodiments, each arm 82, 84 could include the member 86, or like adjustment mechanisms, to facilitate balanced or equal tensioning on either side of the urethra. For example, as shown in FIGS. 36-38, the first extension arm 82 includes separate portions 82a and 82b, with the portion 82a adapted for attachment to or through one of the apertures or locking mechanisms 90a of portion 82b, and the other of the apertures or locking mechanisms 90b of portion 82b adapted for receiving the second extension arm 84. As shown in FIGS. 35 and 38, the device 80 can be deployed, and the procedure performed along a transobturator pathway as well, with the anchors 88 being secured in the obturator muscle or like tissue on either side of the pelvis.


For those embodiments having an eyelet or aperture 90 to interconnect the arms 82, 84 or arm portions (e.g., 82a, 82b and 84), various tools (e.g., insertion and push tools), devices, mechanisms (e.g., grommets, and locking or adjustment elements), and techniques can be used to facilitate selective attachment and tensioning of the arms, including those disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0261955, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Embodiments of the present invention provide key advantages over fixed-length slings, thereby allowing treatment of a large range of patients with a wide range of anatomical dimensions with a single adjustable device.


Various sling devices 30, including those having one or more extension arms 82, 84 (e.g., FIGS. 33-38), can include one or more indicia 100 to indicate adjustment, length and positioning thresholds and targets for the physician—e.g., large (100a), medium (100b), small (100c), etc., as shown in FIGS. 39-41. These indicia 100 can be included along any portion of the sling 30, including the portion intended for general central alignment with the anatomical structure to be supported. The indicia 100 can provide broad or granular adjustment indicators, for general alignment, or alignment with anatomical structures such as the urethra, bladder neck, or like structures. The number of indicia 100, and the visual representations, design and look, can vary greatly depending on the particular sling 30 use application. The indicia 100 can be provided to the corresponding portion of the sling 30 with compatible ink, polymer coating, coloring, molding, bonding, or by adding or otherwise including elements that are adapted to stand out (e.g., color, shape, size, design, etc.) along the designated sling portion.


A variety of materials may be used to form portions or components of the implants and devices 30, including Nitinol, polymers, elastomers, porous mesh, thermoplastic elastomers, metals, ceramics, springs, wires, plastic tubing, and the like. The systems, components and methods may have a number of suitable configurations known to one of ordinary skill in the art after reviewing the disclosure provided herein.


All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.


Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the teachings herein. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.

Claims
  • 1. An elongate implantable incontinence sling system, comprising: a tissue support portion having a first eyelet and a second eyelet;a first extension arm having a first anchor portion and a first extension member, at least a length of the first extension arm is adapted to slide through the first eyelet of the tissue support portion, the first extension member having a first portion of a first construct and a second portion of a second construct different than the first construct of the first extension arm; anda second extension arm having a second anchor portion and a second extension member, at least a length of the second extension arm adapted to slide through the second eyelet of the tissue support portion, the second extension member having a first portion of a first construct and a second portion of a second construct different than the first construct of the second extension arm.
  • 2. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the first construct includes a mesh material.
  • 3. The sling system of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the second extension arm is constructed of a mesh material.
  • 4. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the second extension member includes an extension rod.
  • 5. The sling system of claim 4, wherein the extension rod is a polymer extension rod.
  • 6. The sling system of claim 1, further including a grommet adapted to engage at least one of the first and second eyelets to facilitate attachment of the first extension arm or the second extension arm.
  • 7. The sling system of claim 1, further including one or more alignment indicia provided along a portion of the tissue support portion.
  • 8. The sling system of claim 7, wherein the one or more indicia includes three indicia adapted to guide placement of the elongate sling relative to tissue targeted for support.
  • 9. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the anchor portion of at least one of the first and second extension arms is adapted to engage with obturator tissue.
  • 10. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the anchor portion of at least one of the first and second extension arms is adapted to engage with rectus fascia.
  • 11. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the tissue support portion spans under and provides support to the urethra.
  • 12. An elongate implantable incontinence sling system, comprising: a tissue support portion having a first eyelet and a second eyelet;a first extension arm having a first anchor portion, a first portion having a first width, and a second portion having a second width smaller than the first width, at least a length of the first extension arm being adapted to slide through the first eyelet of the tissue support portion; anda second extension arm having a second anchor portion, a first portion having a first width, and a second portion having a second width smaller than the first width, at least a length of the second extension arm being adapted to slide through the second eyelet of the tissue support portion.
  • 13. The sling system of claim 12, wherein the first portion of the first extension arm is constructed of a mesh material.
  • 14. The sling system of claim 12, wherein the first portion of the second extension arm is constructed of a mesh material.
  • 15. The sling system of claim 12, wherein the second portion of the first extension arm includes an extension rod.
  • 16. The sling system of claim 12, wherein the extension rod is a polymer extension rod.
  • 17. The sling system of claim 12, further including a grommet adapted to engage at least one of the first and second eyelets to facilitate attachment of the first extension arm or the second extension arm.
  • 18. The sling system of claim 12, further including one or more alignment indicia provided along a portion of the tissue support portion.
  • 19. The sling system of claim 1, wherein the second construct includes a rod.
  • 20. The sling system of claim 19, wherein the rod is a polymer rod.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/618,102, filed on Jun. 8, 2017, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/697,525, filed on Apr. 27, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,867,685, which is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/335,472, filed on Dec. 22, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,017,243, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/060,467, filed on May 4, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,181, and which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/426,117, filed on Dec. 22, 2010, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/060,467 claims priority to and the benefit of International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/054909, filed on Aug. 25, 2009, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/091,586, filed on Aug. 25, 2008; with each of the above-referenced applications being fully incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (315)
Number Name Date Kind
2738790 Todt, Sr. et al. Mar 1956 A
3124136 Usher Mar 1964 A
3182662 Shirodkar May 1965 A
3311110 Singerman et al. Mar 1967 A
3384073 Winkle, Jr. May 1968 A
3472232 Earl Oct 1969 A
3580313 Mcknight May 1971 A
3763860 Clarke Oct 1973 A
3789828 Schulte Feb 1974 A
3815576 Balaban Jun 1974 A
3858783 Kapitanov et al. Jan 1975 A
3924633 Cook et al. Dec 1975 A
3995619 Glatzer Dec 1976 A
4019499 Fitzgerald Apr 1977 A
4037603 Wendroff Jul 1977 A
4128100 Wendroff Dec 1978 A
4172458 Pereyra Oct 1979 A
4235238 Ogiu et al. Nov 1980 A
4246660 Wevers Jan 1981 A
4441497 Paudler Apr 1984 A
4509516 Richmond Apr 1985 A
4548202 Duncan Oct 1985 A
4632100 Somers et al. Dec 1986 A
4775380 Seedhom et al. Oct 1988 A
4857041 Annis et al. Aug 1989 A
4865031 OKeeffe Sep 1989 A
4873976 Schreiber Oct 1989 A
4920986 Biswas May 1990 A
4932962 Yoon et al. Jun 1990 A
4938760 Burton et al. Jul 1990 A
4969892 Burton et al. Nov 1990 A
5007894 Enhorning Apr 1991 A
5012822 Schwarz May 1991 A
5013292 Lemay May 1991 A
5013316 Goble et al. May 1991 A
5019032 Robertson May 1991 A
5032508 Naughton et al. Jul 1991 A
5036867 Biswas Aug 1991 A
5053043 Gottesman et al. Oct 1991 A
5085661 Moss Feb 1992 A
5112344 Petros May 1992 A
5123428 Schwarz Jun 1992 A
5141520 Goble et al. Aug 1992 A
5149329 Richardson Sep 1992 A
5188636 Fedotov Feb 1993 A
5209756 Seedhom et al. May 1993 A
5250033 Evans et al. Oct 1993 A
5256133 Spitz Oct 1993 A
5269783 Sander Dec 1993 A
5281237 Gimpelson Jan 1994 A
5328077 Lou Jul 1994 A
5337736 Reddy Aug 1994 A
5362294 Seitzinger Nov 1994 A
5368595 Lewis Nov 1994 A
5370650 Tovey et al. Dec 1994 A
5370662 Stone et al. Dec 1994 A
5376097 Phillips Dec 1994 A
5383904 Totakura et al. Jan 1995 A
5386836 Biswas Feb 1995 A
5403328 Shallman Apr 1995 A
5413598 Moreland May 1995 A
5439467 Benderev et al. Aug 1995 A
5474518 Farrer Velazquez Dec 1995 A
5474543 McKay Dec 1995 A
5518504 Polyak May 1996 A
5520700 Beyar et al. May 1996 A
5520703 Essig et al. May 1996 A
5527342 Pietrzak et al. Jun 1996 A
5544664 Benderev et al. Aug 1996 A
5562689 Green et al. Oct 1996 A
5571139 Jenkins, Jr. Nov 1996 A
5582188 Benderev et al. Dec 1996 A
5591163 Thompson Jan 1997 A
5591206 Moufarrege Jan 1997 A
5611515 Benderev et al. Mar 1997 A
5628756 Barker, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5633286 Chen May 1997 A
5643320 Lower et al. Jul 1997 A
5647836 Blake, III et al. Jul 1997 A
5669935 Rosenman et al. Sep 1997 A
5683349 Makower et al. Nov 1997 A
5697931 Thompson Dec 1997 A
5709708 Thal Jan 1998 A
5725541 Anspach, III et al. Mar 1998 A
5741282 Anspach, III et al. Apr 1998 A
5782916 Pintauro et al. Jul 1998 A
5785640 Kresch et al. Jul 1998 A
5807403 Beyar et al. Sep 1998 A
5836314 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5836315 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5840011 Landgrebe et al. Nov 1998 A
5842478 Benderev et al. Dec 1998 A
5860425 Benderev et al. Jan 1999 A
5899909 Claren et al. May 1999 A
5919232 Chaffringeon et al. Jul 1999 A
5922026 Chin Jul 1999 A
5925047 Errico et al. Jul 1999 A
5934283 Willem et al. Aug 1999 A
5935122 Fourkas et al. Aug 1999 A
5944732 Raulerson et al. Aug 1999 A
5954057 Li Sep 1999 A
5972000 Beyar et al. Oct 1999 A
5980558 Wiley Nov 1999 A
5984927 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
5988171 Sohn et al. Nov 1999 A
5997554 Thompson Dec 1999 A
6010447 Kardjian Jan 2000 A
6027523 Schmieding Feb 2000 A
6030393 Corlew Feb 2000 A
6031148 Hayes et al. Feb 2000 A
6036701 Rosenman Mar 2000 A
6039686 Kovac Mar 2000 A
6042534 Gellman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042536 Tihon et al. Mar 2000 A
6042583 Thompson et al. Mar 2000 A
6048351 Gordon et al. Apr 2000 A
6050937 Benderev Apr 2000 A
6053935 Brenneman et al. Apr 2000 A
6056688 Benderev et al. May 2000 A
6068591 Bruckner et al. May 2000 A
6071290 Compton Jun 2000 A
6074341 Anderson et al. Jun 2000 A
6077216 Benderev et al. Jun 2000 A
6099538 Moses et al. Aug 2000 A
6099551 Gabbay Aug 2000 A
6099552 Adams Aug 2000 A
6106545 Egan Aug 2000 A
6110101 Tihon et al. Aug 2000 A
6117067 GilVernet Sep 2000 A
6127597 Beyar et al. Oct 2000 A
6168611 Rizvi Jan 2001 B1
6200330 Benderev et al. Mar 2001 B1
6221005 Bruckner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6241736 Sater et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264676 Gellman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273852 Lehe et al. Aug 2001 B1
6302840 Benderev Oct 2001 B1
6306079 Trabucco Oct 2001 B1
6322492 Kovac Nov 2001 B1
6328686 Kovac Dec 2001 B1
6328744 Harari et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334446 Beyar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6352553 Van Der Burg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6382214 Raz et al. May 2002 B1
6387041 Harari et al. May 2002 B1
6406423 Scetbon Jun 2002 B1
6406480 Beyar et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414179 Banville et al. Jul 2002 B1
6451024 Thompson et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475139 Miller Nov 2002 B1
6478727 Scetbon Nov 2002 B2
6482214 Sidor, Jr. et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491703 Ulmsten Dec 2002 B1
6494906 Owens Dec 2002 B1
6502578 Raz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506190 Walshe Jan 2003 B1
6530943 Hoepffner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6575897 Ory et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582443 Cabak et al. Jun 2003 B2
6592515 Thierfelder et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592610 Beyar Jul 2003 B2
6596001 Stormby et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599235 Kovac Jul 2003 B2
6599323 Melican et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602260 Harari et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612977 Staskin et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638210 Berger Oct 2003 B2
6638211 Suslian et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638284 Rousseau et al. Oct 2003 B1
6641524 Kovac Nov 2003 B2
6641525 Rocheleau et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648921 Anderson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652450 Neisz et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673010 Skiba et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685629 Therin Feb 2004 B2
6689047 Gellman Feb 2004 B2
6691711 Raz et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699175 Miller Mar 2004 B2
6702827 Lund et al. Mar 2004 B1
6752814 Gellman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755781 Gellman Jun 2004 B2
6802807 Anderson et al. Oct 2004 B2
6830052 Carter et al. Dec 2004 B2
6881184 Zappala Apr 2005 B2
6884212 Thierfelder et al. Apr 2005 B2
6908425 Luscombe Jun 2005 B2
6908473 Skiba et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911002 Fierro Jun 2005 B2
6911003 Anderson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6932759 Kammerer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936052 Gellman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953428 Gellman et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960160 Browning Nov 2005 B2
6971986 Staskin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974462 Sater Dec 2005 B2
6981944 Jamiolkowski et al. Jan 2006 B2
6981983 Rosenblatt et al. Jan 2006 B1
6991597 Gellman et al. Jan 2006 B2
7014607 Gellman Mar 2006 B2
7025063 Snitkin et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025772 Gellman et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037255 Inman et al. May 2006 B2
7048682 Neisz et al. May 2006 B2
7056333 Walshe Jun 2006 B2
7070556 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070558 Gellman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083568 Neisz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083637 Tannhauser Aug 2006 B1
7087065 Ulmsten et al. Aug 2006 B2
7112210 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2006 B2
7121997 Kammerer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131943 Kammerer Nov 2006 B2
7131944 Jacquetin Nov 2006 B2
7175591 Kaladelfos Feb 2007 B2
7198597 Siegel et al. Apr 2007 B2
7226407 Kammerer et al. Jun 2007 B2
7226408 Harai et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229404 Bouffier Jun 2007 B2
7229453 Anderson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235043 Gellman et al. Jun 2007 B2
7261723 Smith et al. Aug 2007 B2
7297102 Smith et al. Nov 2007 B2
7299803 Kovac et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303525 Watschke et al. Dec 2007 B2
7326213 Benderev et al. Feb 2008 B2
7347812 Mellier Mar 2008 B2
7351197 Montpetit et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357773 Watschke Apr 2008 B2
7364541 Chu et al. Apr 2008 B2
7371245 Evans et al. May 2008 B2
7387634 Benderev Jun 2008 B2
7393320 Montpetit et al. Jul 2008 B2
7407480 Staskin et al. Aug 2008 B2
7410460 Benderev Aug 2008 B2
7413540 Gellman et al. Aug 2008 B2
7422557 Arnal et al. Sep 2008 B2
7431690 Merade et al. Oct 2008 B2
7494495 Delorme et al. Feb 2009 B2
7500945 Cox et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513865 Bourne et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527588 Zaddem et al. May 2009 B2
7588598 Delorme et al. Sep 2009 B2
7601118 Smith et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611454 De Leval Nov 2009 B2
7621864 Suslian et al. Nov 2009 B2
7637860 MacLean Dec 2009 B2
7686759 Sater Mar 2010 B2
7691050 Gellman et al. Apr 2010 B2
7722527 Bouchier et al. May 2010 B2
7722528 Arnal et al. May 2010 B2
7740576 Raff et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753839 Siegel et al. Jul 2010 B2
7762942 Neisz et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766926 Bosley, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789821 Browning Sep 2010 B2
8968181 Roll et al. Mar 2015 B2
9017243 Roll et al. Apr 2015 B2
9687685 Chmielewski Jun 2017 B1
9918816 Roll et al. Mar 2018 B2
10537416 Roll Jan 2020 B2
20010049467 Lehe et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007222 Desai Jan 2002 A1
20020028980 Thierfelder et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020128670 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147382 Neisz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151909 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161382 Neisz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030004581 Rousseau Jan 2003 A1
20030036676 Scetbon Feb 2003 A1
20030065402 Anderson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030176875 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040015057 Rocheleau et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039453 Anderson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073235 Lund et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040225181 Chu et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040267088 Kammerer Dec 2004 A1
20050000523 Beraud Jan 2005 A1
20050004427 Cervigni Jan 2005 A1
20050004576 Benderev Jan 2005 A1
20050038451 Rao et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050055104 Arnal et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050131391 Chu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131393 Chu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050199249 Karram Sep 2005 A1
20050245787 Cox et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256530 Petros Nov 2005 A1
20050277806 Cristalli Dec 2005 A1
20050278037 Delorme et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283189 Rosenblatt Dec 2005 A1
20060015010 Jaffe et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060028828 Phillips Feb 2006 A1
20060058578 Browning Mar 2006 A1
20060089524 Chu Apr 2006 A1
20060089525 Mamo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060122457 Kovac et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060173237 Jacquetin Aug 2006 A1
20060195007 Anderson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195011 Arnal et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060217589 Wan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229493 Weiser et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060229596 Weiser et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060252980 Arnal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060287571 Gozzi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070015953 MacLean Jan 2007 A1
20070078295 Landgrebe et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070173864 Chu Jul 2007 A1
20080039678 Montpetit et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045782 Jimenez Feb 2008 A1
20080300607 Meade et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090005634 Rane et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012353 Beyer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090221868 Evans Sep 2009 A1
20110112357 Chapman et al. May 2011 A1
20150164626 Roll et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150238297 Roll et al. Aug 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (104)
Number Date Country
2002241673 Aug 2005 AU
2404459 Aug 2005 CA
2305815 Aug 1974 DE
1220283 May 1994 DE
19544162 Apr 1997 DE
20016866 Dec 2000 DE
10211360 Oct 2003 DE
248544 Dec 1987 EP
470308 Feb 1992 EP
632999 Jan 1995 EP
643945 Mar 1995 EP
650703 May 1995 EP
1093758 Apr 2001 EP
1060714 Oct 2002 EP
1342450 Jan 2007 EP
2323586 May 2011 EP
2787990 Jul 2000 FR
2852813 Oct 2004 FR
2268690 Jan 1994 GB
2353220 Feb 2001 GB
RM980239 Oct 1999 IT
2001511686 Aug 2001 JP
1225547 Apr 1986 SU
1342486 Oct 1987 SU
1993017635 Sep 1993 WO
1993019678 Oct 1993 WO
1995011631 May 1995 WO
1995025469 Sep 1995 WO
1997016121 May 1997 WO
1997030638 Aug 1997 WO
1997047244 Dec 1997 WO
1998019606 May 1998 WO
1998035606 Aug 1998 WO
1998035616 Aug 1998 WO
1998035632 Aug 1998 WO
1998042261 Oct 1998 WO
1998053746 Dec 1998 WO
1999016381 Apr 1999 WO
1999037217 Jul 1999 WO
1999052450 Oct 1999 WO
1999053844 Oct 1999 WO
1999059477 Nov 1999 WO
2000013601 Mar 2000 WO
2000018319 Apr 2000 WO
2000027304 May 2000 WO
2000040158 Jul 2000 WO
2000057812 Oct 2000 WO
2000064370 Nov 2000 WO
2000066030 Nov 2000 WO
2000074594 Dec 2000 WO
2000074613 Dec 2000 WO
2000074633 Dec 2000 WO
2001006951 Feb 2001 WO
2001026581 Apr 2001 WO
2001039670 Jun 2001 WO
2001045588 Jun 2001 WO
2001045589 Jun 2001 WO
2001056499 Aug 2001 WO
2002028312 Apr 2002 WO
2002028315 Apr 2002 WO
2002030293 Apr 2002 WO
2002032284 Apr 2002 WO
2002034124 May 2002 WO
2002038079 May 2002 WO
2002039890 May 2002 WO
2002058563 Aug 2002 WO
2002062237 Aug 2002 WO
2002069781 Sep 2002 WO
2002071953 Sep 2002 WO
2002078552 Oct 2002 WO
2002089704 Nov 2002 WO
2003017848 Mar 2003 WO
2003028585 Apr 2003 WO
2003037215 May 2003 WO
2003041613 May 2003 WO
2003047435 Jun 2003 WO
2003068107 Aug 2003 WO
2003075792 Sep 2003 WO
2003092546 Nov 2003 WO
2003096929 Nov 2003 WO
2004012626 Feb 2004 WO
2004016196 Feb 2004 WO
2004017862 Mar 2004 WO
2004034912 Apr 2004 WO
2005037132 Apr 2005 WO
2005079702 Sep 2005 WO
2005122954 Dec 2005 WO
2006015031 Feb 2006 WO
2006108145 Oct 2006 WO
2007011341 Jan 2007 WO
2007014241 Feb 2007 WO
2007016083 Feb 2007 WO
2007027592 Mar 2007 WO
2007059199 May 2007 WO
2007081955 Jul 2007 WO
2007097994 Aug 2007 WO
2007137226 Nov 2007 WO
2007146784 Dec 2007 WO
2007149348 Dec 2007 WO
2007149555 Dec 2007 WO
2008057261 May 2008 WO
2008124056 Oct 2008 WO
2009005714 Jan 2009 WO
2009017680 Feb 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (204)
Entry
AlloSource Product Literature, 11 pages.
Capio® CL Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device, The Capio CL Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device allows for a transvaginal suture fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, 2002, 8 pages.
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Monofilament and Multifilament Polypropylene Mesh—A Case report, Tyco Healthcare, United States Surgical, 4 pages.
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, The tension-free Solution to Female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldw[de, 2002, 6 pages.
IVS Tunneller, Australian Medical Design Breakthrough for GSI, mixed incontinence and vault prolapse, AMA Medical Products, 4 pages.
IVS Tunneller, AMA, 4 pages.
IVS Tunneller—A Universal instrument for anterior and posterior intra-vaginal tape placemen, TCO Healthcare, Aug. 2002, 4 pages.
LigiSure Atlas™, Tyco Healthcare, Valleylab®, 2 pages.
Intramesh L.I.F.T. Siliconized polyester, Cousin Biotech, 1 page.
Intramesh® L.I.F.T.® Polypropylene Less Invasive Free Tape, Cousin Biotech, 2 pages.
Mentor Porges, Uratape, ICS/IUGA Symp, Jul. 2002.
Readjustable REMEEX System, Neomedic International, 8 Pages.
SABRE™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor, May 2002, 4 pages.
SABRE™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 2002, 6 pages.
The McGuire™ Suture Guide: A Single Use Instrument Designed for the Placement of a Suburethral Sling, Bard, 2001, 2 pages.
Urethrovaginal Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Correction of Stress Incontinence, Cystocele, and Prolapse, Am. J. Obst. & Gyn, vol. 31, 1961, pp. 281-290.
UroMed Access Instrument System for the Sub-urethral Sling Procedure Catalog No. 120235, Directions for Use, 3 pages.
We're staying ahead of the curve, Introducing the IVS Tunneller Device for Tension Free Procedures, Tyco Healthcare, 2002, 3 pages.
Aldridge, Albert H., “Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 44, 1948, pp. 398-411.
Amundsen et al., “Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women who Also Require a Pubovaginal Sling”, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, May 2003, pp. 1770-1774.
Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Spension of the Vesical Neck”, Journal of Urology, 144, Aug. 1990, pp. 319-323.
Asmussen et al., “Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry with a New Technique”, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 10, 1976, pp. 7-11.
Beck et al., “Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence With Anterior Colporrhaphy”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 3, Mar. 1982, pp. 269-274.
Benderev, Theodore V., “A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System”, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, Dec. 1994, pp. 2316-2320.
Benderev, Theodore V., “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension”, Journal of Urology, 40, Nov. 1992, pp. 409-418.
Bergman et al., “Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Study”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 173, No. 1, Jul. 1995, pp. 66-71.
Blaivas, Jerry, “Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure”, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, 1990, pp. 93-101.
Blaivas et al., “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, 145, Jun. 1991, pp. 1214-1218.
Blaivas et al., “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment”, 1984, pp. 173-475.
Boston Scientific, “Surgical Mesh Sling Kit”, Advantage AT™, 2002, 6 pages.
Boyles et al., “Procedures for Urinary Incontinence in the United States”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 189, No. 1, Jul. 2003, pp. 70-75.
Bryans, Fred E., “Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, Feb. 1979, pp. 292-294.
Cervigni et al., “The Use of Synthetics in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, vol. 11, 2001, pp. 429-435.
Choe et al., “Gore-tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later”, Ucology, vol. 54, 1999, pp. 641-646.
Cook/OB GYN®, “Urogynecology”, Copyright Cook Urological Inc., 1996, pp. 1-36.
Dargent et al., “Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, 2002, pp. 576-582.
Das et al., “Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, Sep. 1995, pp. 1119-1121.
Debodinance et al., “Tolerance of Synthetic Tissues in Touch With Vaginal Scars: Review to the Point of 287 Cases”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 87, 1999, pp. 23-30.
Decter, Ross M., “Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, Aug. 1993, pp. 683-686.
Delancey, John, “Structural Support of the Urethra as It Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 170, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1713-1723.
Delorme, Emmanuel, “Trans-obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, 2001, pp. 1306-1313.
Diana et al., “Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse with Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy Using Prolene Mesh”, American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, Feb. 2000, pp. 126-128.
Conquy, Dr. Sophie, “Le point sur I'incontinence urinaire”, Expertise et Practiques en Urologie, No. 3 [Hospital Cochin, Paris], pp. 17-19.
Drutz et al., “Clinical and Urodynamic Re-evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, 1990, pp. 70-73.
Eglin et al., “Transobturator Subvesical Mesh”, Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series, Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 31, Issue 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 14-19.
Enzelsberger et al., “Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, 1990, pp. 51-54.
Eriksen et al., “Long-term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, 1990, pp. 45-50.
Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinence Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1966, pp. 133-137.
Falconer et al., “Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp 2, 2001, pp. S19-S23.
Farnsworth, “Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (Infracoccygeal Sacropexy) for Sever Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse—A Preliminary Report on Efficacy and Safety”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 13, 2002, pp. 4-8.
Farquhar et al., “Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990-1997”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 99. No. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 229-234.
Fidela, et al., “Pelvic Support Defects and Visceral and Sexual Function in Women Treated With Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension and Pelvic Reconstruction”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6, Dec. 1996.
Flood, C.G., “Anterior Colporrhaphy Reinforce With Marlex Mesh for the Treatment of Cystoceles”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, 1998, pp. 200-204.
Gilja et al., “A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch)”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 153, May 1995, pp. 1455-1457.
Gittes, Ruben F., “No-incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 138, Sep. 1987.
Guner et al., “Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy for Marked Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse”, International Journal of Gynec & Obstetrics, vol. 74, 2001, pp. 165-170.
Handa et al., “Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 6, Dec. 1996, 5 pages.
Heit et al., “Predicting Treatment Choice for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, No. 6, Jun. 2003, pp. 1279-1284.
Henriksson et al., “A Urodynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Urethroplasty in Women With Stress Incontinence”, Am J. Obstet Gynecol, vol. 131, No. 1, Mar. 1, 1978, pp. 77-82.
Hodgkinson et al., “Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female”, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Henry Ford Hospital, vol. 10, No. 5, Nov. 1957, pp. 493-499.
Holschneider et al., “The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-year Review”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 83, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 573-578.
Horbach et al., “Instruments and Methods, A Suburethral Sling Procedure With Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients With Low Urethral Closure Pressure”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 71, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 648-652.
Horbach, Nicollette, “Suburethral Sling Procedures”, Genuine Stress Incontinence, Chapter 42, pp. 569-579.
Ingelman-Sunberg et al., “Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10, 1983, pp. 51-69.
IVS Tunneller, “ein universelles Instrument fur die Intra Vaginal Schlingenplastik”, TCO Healthcare, 2001, 4 pages.
Jeffcoate et al., “The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence”, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1956, pp. 36-39.
Jones et al., “Pelvic Connective Tissue Resilience Decreases With Vaginal Delivery, Menopause and Uterine Prolapse”, Br J Surg, vol. 90, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 466-472.
Julian, Thomas, “The Efficacy of Marlex Mesh in The Repair of Sever, Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse of the Anterior Midvaginal Wall”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6, Dec. 1996, pp. 1472-1475.
Karram et al., “Chapter 19 : Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse”, Urogyn-cology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, 1999, pp. 235-256.
Karram et al., “Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling For Recurrent For Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence”, vol. 75, Mar. 1990, pp. 461-463.
Kersey, “The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation in the Treatment of Stress Incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, Oct. 1983, pp. 945-949.
Klutke et al., “The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magentic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, Mar. 1990, pp. 563-566.
Klutke et al., “The Promise of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape for Female SUI”, Contemporary Urology, Oct. 2000, 7 pages.
Klutke et al., “Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 2, Aug. 1996, pp. 294-296.
Korda et al., “Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience”, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, May 1989, pp. 150-154.
Kovac, S. Robert, “Follow-up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling Operation for Recurrent Urinary ncontinence (Kovac Procedure)”, Journal of Pelvic Surgery, May 1999, pp. 156-160.
Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent—Urinary Incontinence”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 624-627.
Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?”, Contemeorary OB/GYN, Feb. 1998, 10 pages.
Kovac, Stephen Robert, M.D., Cirriculum Vitae, Jun. 18, 1999, pp. 1-33.
Leach, Gary E., “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension”, Urology vol. XXXI, No. 5, May 1988, pp. 388-390.
Leach et al., “Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, American Urological Association, vol. 158, Sep. 1997, pp. 875-880.
Lightenstein et al., “The Tension Free Hemioplasty”, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 157, Feb. 1989, pp. 188-193.
Loughlin et al., “Review of An 8-year Experience With Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, 1990, pp. 44-45.
Luber et al., “The Demographics of Pelvic Floor Disorders: Current Observations and Future Projections”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, No. 7, Jun. 2001, pp. 1496-1503.
Mage, “Technique Chirurgicale, L'interpostion D'un Treillis Synthetique Dans La Cure Par Voie Vaginale Des Prolapsus Genitaux”, J Gynecol Obstet Bioi Reprod, vol. 28, 1999, pp. 825-829.
Marchionni et al., “True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse—Thirteen Years of Experience”, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 679-684.
Marinkovic et al., “Triple Compartment Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy With Anterior and Posterior Mesh Extensions”, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 110, Mar. 2003, pp. 323-326.
Marshall et al., “The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension”, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, 1949, pp. 509-518.
Mascio, Valenzio C., “MITEK Brochure, Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Using Mitek Gill Anchors”.
McGuire et al., “Abdominal Fascial Slings”, Slings, Raz Female Urology, 1996, pp. 369-375.
McGuire, E J., “Abdominal Procedure for Stress Incontinence”, Urol Clin North Am., vol. 12, No. 2, May 1985, pp. 285-290.
McGuire et al., “Experience With Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at the University of Michigan”, Journal of Urology, vol. 138, 1987, pp. 90-93.
McGuire et al., “Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, vol. 119, No. 1, 1978, pp. 82-84.
McGuire, Edward J., “The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Profiles in Urology, pp. 3-18.
McIndoe et al., “The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Aust. N Z Journal of Obstet Gynecology, Aug. 1987, pp. 238-239.
McKiel et al., “Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 96, No. 5, Dec. 1966, pp. 737-739.
Migliari, Roberto, “Tension-free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior-vaginal Wall Prolapse”, Eur Urol, vol. 38, Oct. 1999, pp. 151-155.
Migliari et al., “Treatment Results Using a Mixed Fiber Mesh in Patients With Grade IV Cystocele”, Journal of Urology, vol. 161, Apr. 1999, pp. 1255-1258.
Moir et al., “The Gauze-Hammock Operation”, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of British Commonwealth, vol. 75, No. 1, Jan. 1968, pp. 1-9.
Morgan et al., “A Sling Operation, Using Madex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence”, Am J. Obst. & Gynecol, Feb. 1970, pp. 369-377.
Morgan, J.E., “The Marlex Sling Operation for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 16-year Review”, American Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 151, No. 2, Jan. 1998, pp. 224-226.
Morley et al., “Sacrospinous Ligament Fixations for Eversion of the Vagina”, Am J Obstet Gyn, vol. 158, No. 4, Apr. 1988, pp. 872-881.
Mouly et al., “Vaginal Reconstruction of a Complete Vaginal Prolapse: The Trans Obturator Repair”, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, Apr. 2003, pp. 183.
Narik et al., “A Simplified Sling Operation Suitable for Routine Use”, Gynecological and Obstetrical Clinic, University of Vienna, vol. 84, No. 3, Aug. 1, 1962, pp. 400-405.
Natale et al., “Tension Free Cystocele Repair (TCR): Long-term Follow-up”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 11, Supp. 1, Oct. 2000, pp. S51.
Nichols, David H., “The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, Jan. 1973, pp. 88-93.
Nicita, Giulio, “A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse”, Journal of Urology, vol. 160, Sep. 1998, pp. 741-745.
Niknejad et al., “Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence”, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, 2002, pp. 597-611.
Morris et al., “Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach”, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, Issue 3, Jun. 1996, pp. 227-230.
O'Donnell, Pat, “Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and Mcguire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, Jan. 1992, pp. 389-392.
Ostergard et al., “Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice”, 1996, pp. 569-579.
Paraiso et al., “Laparoscopic Surgery for Enterocele, Vaginal Apex Prolapse and Rectocele”, Int. Urogx:necol J, vol. 10, 1999, pp. 223-229.
Parra et al., “Experience with a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, British Journal of Urology, vol. 66, Issue 6, Dec. 1990, pp. 615-617.
Pelosi et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 45-50.
Pereyra, “A Simplified Surgical Procedure for the Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women”, West. J. Surg. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959, pp. 223-226.
Pereyra et al., “Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 643-648.
Petros et al., “An Analysis of Rapid Pad Testing and the History for the Diagnosis of Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 71, 1992, pp. 529-536.
Petros et al., “An Integral Theory and Its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supp. 153, 1993, 1 page.
Petros et al., “Anchoring the Midurethra Restores Bladder-neck Anatomy and Continence”, The Lancet, vol. 354, Sep. 18, 1999, pp. 997-998.
Petros, Peter E., “Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather Than Urethral Closure”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 37-39.
Petros et al., “Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter”, Acta Obstet Gvnecol Scand, vol. 69, Supp 153, 1990, 75 pages.
Petros, Peter, “Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 61-62.
Petros, Peter, “Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery Preliminary Report”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1998, pp. 20-27.
Petros et al., “Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(With Midline “Tuck”)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Supp. 153, 1993, pp. 69-71.
Petros et al., “Integral Therory of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 7-31.
Petros et al., “Medium-term Follow-up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time”, 1999, 3 pages.
Petros, “New Ambulatory Surgical Methods Using an Anatomical Classification of Urinary Dysfunction Improve Stress Urge and Abnormal Emptying”, Int. Urogynecology Journal Pelvic Floor Dystfunction, vol. 8, 1997, pp. 270-278.
Petros, Peter, “Part 1: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 5-28.
Petros et al., “Part II: The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and Supporting Ligaments With Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 29-40 (Plus CoverSheet).
Petros et al., “Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving From the Theory”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 41-52.
Petros et al., “Part IV: Surgical Appliations of the Theory Development of the Intravaginal Sling Pklasty (IVS) Procedure”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 53-54.
Petros et al., “Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup. 153, 1990, pp. 33-35.
Petros et al., “Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup. 153, 1990, pp. 77-79.
Petros et al., “The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-ligament”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 43-51.
Petros et al., “The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation an Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69,Sup 153, 1990, pp. 53-59.
Petros et al., “The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(With Bilateral “Tucks”)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 61-67.
Petros et al., “The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 85-87.
Petros et al., “The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 73-75.
Petros et al., “The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics,Sup 153, 1993, pp. 77-79.
Petros, Peter, “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 36, Issue 4, Nov. 1996, pp. 453-461.
Petros et al., “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double Breasted”, Vaginal Flap Repair-attached Flap”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 81-84.
Petros et al., “The Posterior Fornix Syn6rome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving From Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourlogy and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 89-93.
Petros et al., “The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fomix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69,Sup 153, 1990, pp. 71-73.
Petros et al., “The Tethered Vagina Syndrome Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69 Sup 153, 1990, pp. 63-67.
Petros et al., “The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69 Sup 153, 1990, pp. 41-42.
Petros et al., “Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates from Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure”, Neurourology and Urodynamics vol. 14 No. 4, 1995, pp. 337-346.
Petros, Peter, “Vault Prolapse II: Restoration of Dynamic Vaginal Supports by Infracoccygeal Sacropexy an Axial Day-case Vaginal Procedure”, Int Urogynecol J vol. 12, 2001, pp. 296-303.
Petros et al., “An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 55-60.
Petros et al., “Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 235-239.
Petros et al., “Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 69-70.
Petros et al., “Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation According to the Integrated Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Chapter 7, pp. 249-258.
Pourdeyhimi, B, “Porosity of Surgical Mesh Fabrics: New Technology”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. A1, 1989, pp. 145-152.
Rackley, Raymond, “Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement”, Urology Times, 2000, pp. 46,48,49.
Rackley et al., “Tension-free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures”, Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, No. 2, 2001, pp. 90-100.
Rackley, Raymond, “The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Results in 206 Patients”, The Journal of Urology, 1992, pp. 845-846.
Raz, Shlomo, “Female Urology”, 1996, pp. 80-86, 369-398 & 435-442.
Raz, Shlomo, “Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence”, Urology vol. 17, No. 1, Jan. 1981, pp. 82-85.
Richardson et al., “Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used In Urethropexy”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 29, No. 9, 1984, pp. 689-692.
Richter, K, “Massive Eversion of the Vagina: Pathogenesis Diagnosis and Therapy of the “True” Prolapse of the Vaginal Stump”, Clin Obstet Gynecol, vol. 25, 1982, pp. 897-912.
Ridley, John, “Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure”, American Journal Obst & Gynec, vol. 95,No. 5, Jul. 1, 1986, pp. 741-721.
Roberts, Henry, “Cystourethrography in Women”, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, vol. XXXV, No. 293, 1952, pp. 253-259.
Sanz et al., “Modification of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 496-500.
Seim et al., “A Study of Female Urinary Incontinence in General Practice”, Demography, Medical History, and Clinical Findings,Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology,vol. 30, 1996, pp. 465-472.
Sergent et al., “Prosthetic Restoration of the Pelvic Diaphragm in Genital Urinary Prolapse Surgery: Transobturator and Infacoccygeal Hammock Technique”, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 32, 2003, pp. 120-126.
Sloan et al., “Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings”, The Journal of Urology,vol. 110, 1973, pp. 533-536.
Spencer et al., “A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, 1987, pp. 411-415.
Stamey, Thomas A., “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females”, Annals of Surgery vol. 192 No. 4, Oct. 1980, pp. 465-471.
Stanton, Stuart L., “Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women”, Journal of American Geriatrics Society,vol. 38,No. 3, 1990, pp. 348-351.
Stanton et al., “Surgery of Female Incontinence”, 1986, pp. 105-113.
Staskin et al., “A Comparison of Tensile Strength among Three Preparations of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Human Fascia Lata Allografts”, 2 pages.
Staskin et al., “The Gore-tex sling procedure for female sphincteric incontinence: indications, technique, and results”, World J of Urol. vol. 15 No. 5, 1997, pp. 295-299.
Studdiford, William E., “Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1944, pp. 764-775.
Subak et al., “Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 98, No. 4, Oct. 2001, pp. 857-863.
Sullivan et al., “Total Pelvic Mesh Repair a Ten-Year Experience”, Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 44, No. 6, Jun. 2001, pp. 857-863.
SUPORT™, “Sub-Urethral Perineal Retro-Pubic Tensionless Sling”, Matrix Medical (Pvt) Ltd, 1 page.
Swift, S. E., “Case-Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Sever Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, 2001, pp. 187-192.
T-SLING®, “Urinary Incontinence Procedure”, (Totally Tension-free) Hemiamesh, 2 pages.
TVT, “Tension-free Vaginal Tape”, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 1999, 23 pages.
Ulmsten et al., “A Multicenter Study of Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, 1998, pp. 210-213.
Ulmsten et al., “A Three Year Follow up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, 1999, pp. 345-350.
Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, May 1996, pp. 81-86.
Ulmsten et al., “Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1987, pp. 455-457.
Ulmsten et al., “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, 1995, pp. 75-82.
Ulmsten et al., “The Unstable Female Urethra”, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 144 No. 1, Sep. 1, 1982, pp. 93-97.
Ulmsten, U., “Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis a Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 6, 1995, pp. 2-3.
VESICA®, “Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit”, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 1995, 4 pages.
VESICA®, “Sling Kits”, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 1998, 4 pages.
Villet et al., “Gynecolgie Obstetrique & Fertile”, vol. 31, 2003, p. 96.
Visco et al., “Vaginal Mesh Erosion After Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, n. 3, pp. 297-302.
Walters, Mark D., “Percutaneous Suburethral Slings: State of the Art”, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, Oct. 2001, 29 pages.
Waxman et al., “Advanced Urologic Surgery for Urinary Incontinence”, The Female Patient, vol. 21, Mar. 1996, pp. 93-100.
Weber et al., “Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: Review of Anatomy and Techniques of Surgical Repair”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 311-318.
Webster, George D., “Female Urinary Incontinence”, Urologic Surgery, pp. 665-679.
Webster et al., “Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, Sep. 1990, pp. 670-673.
Winter, Chester C., “Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women”, Urology, vol. XX, No. 4, Oct. 1982, pp. 408-411.
Winters et al., “Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Enterocele Repair in the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse”, Urology, vol. 56, supp. 6A, 2000, pp. 55-63.
Woodside et al., “Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 135, Jan. 1986, pp. 97-99.
Zacharin et al., “Pulsion Enterocele: Long-term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 55 No. 2, Feb. 1980, pp. 141-148.
Zacharin, Robert, “The Suspensory Mechanism of the Female Urethra”, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 97, Part 3, 1963, pp. 423-427.
Zimmern et al., “Four-Comer Bladder Neck Suspension”, Vaginal Surgery for the Urologist, vol. 2, No. 1, Apr. 1994, pp. 29-36.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,102, filed Jun. 8, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/060,467, filed May 4, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/335,472, filed Dec. 22, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,525, filed Apr. 27, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200113664 A1 Apr 2020 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61426117 Dec 2010 US
61091586 Aug 2008 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15618102 Jun 2017 US
Child 16710833 US
Parent 14697525 Apr 2015 US
Child 15618102 US
Parent 13335472 Dec 2011 US
Child 14697525 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13060467 US
Child 13335472 US