The present invention relates to apparatus, tools and methods for treating pelvic conditions by providing and using one or more pelvic implants to support pelvic tissue.
It has been reported that over 13 million American men and women of all ages suffer from urinary and fecal incontinence. The social implications for an incontinent patient include loss of self-esteem, embarrassment, restriction of social and sexual activities, isolation, depression and, in some instances, dependence on caregivers. Incontinence is the most common reason for institutionalization of the elderly.
The urinary system consists of the kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra. The bladder is a hollow, muscular, balloon-shaped sac that serves as a storage container for urine. The bladder is located behind the pubic bone and is protected by the pelvis. Ligaments hold the bladder in place and connect it to the pelvis and other tissue.
Urinary incontinence may occur when the muscles of the urinary system are injured, malfunction or are weakened. Other factors, such as trauma to the urethral area, neurological injury, hormonal imbalance or medication side-effects, may also cause or contribute to incontinence. There are five basic types of incontinence: stress incontinence, urge incontinence, mixed incontinence, overflow incontinence, and functional incontinence. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the involuntary loss of urine that occurs due to sudden increases in intraabdominal pressure resulting from activities such as coughing, sneezing, lifting, straining, exercise and, in severe cases, even simply changing body position. Urge incontinence, also termed “hyperactive bladder” “frequency/urgency syndrome” or “irritable bladder,” occurs when an individual experiences the immediate need to urinate and loses bladder control before reaching the toilet. Mixed incontinence is the most common form of urinary incontinence. Inappropriate bladder contractions and weakened sphincter muscles usually cause this type of incontinence. Mixed incontinence is a combination of the symptoms for both stress and urge incontinence. Overflow incontinence is a constant dripping or leakage of urine caused by an overfilled bladder. Functional incontinence results when a person has difficulty moving from one place to another. It is generally caused by factors outside the lower urinary tract, such as deficits in physical function and/or cognitive function.
SUI is generally thought to be related to hypermobility of the bladder neck or an intrinsic urethral sphincter defect. A variety of treatment options are currently available to treat incontinence. Some of these treatment options include external devices, behavioral therapy (such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, or Kegal exercises), injectable materials, prosthetic devices and/or surgery. Depending on age, medical condition, and personal preference, surgical procedures can be used to completely restore continence.
Conservative management of SUI can include lifestyle changes, such as weight loss, smoking cessation, and modification of intake of diuretic fluids such as coffee and alcohol. With regard to surgical treatments, the purported “gold standard” is the Burch Colposuspension in which the bladder neck is suspended. Mid-urethral slings have been similarly effective. One type of procedure, found to be an especially successful treatment option for SUI in both men and women, is a sling and support procedure.
A sling procedure is a surgical method involving the placement of a sling to stabilize or support the bladder neck or urethra. There are a variety of different sling procedures. Slings used for pubovaginal procedures differ in the type of material and anchoring methods. In some cases, the sling is placed under the bladder neck and secured via suspension structures or sutures to a point of attachment (e.g., tissue or bone) through an abdominal and/or vaginal incision.
Although serious complications associated with sling procedures are infrequent, they can occur. Complications for certain sling procedures may include urethral obstruction, development of de nova urge incontinence, hemorrhage, prolonged urinary retention, infection, damage to surrounding tissue and erosion.
Fecal incontinence, like urinary incontinence, has proven to be challenging to treat. Patients whose fecal incontinence is caused by external anal sphincter injury is treated surgically, as with a sphincteroplasty. Other patients, though, are considered to have neurogenic or idiopathic fecal incontinence, and efforts to treat these patients has been less successful. Various procedures, such as postanal repair, total pelvic floor repair, muscle transposition techniques, dynamic graciloplasty, artificial sphincter procedures, and sacral nerve stimulation. Success has been limited, and the various treatment modalities can result in morbidity.
There is a desire for a minimally invasive yet highly effective treatment modality that can be used with minimal to no side effects for the treatment of both urinary and fecal incontinence. Further, the method of treatment should also improve the quality of life for patients.
The present invention can include surgical instruments, implantable articles, and methods for urological applications, particularly for the treatment of stress and/or urge urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and prolapse and perinea! floor repairs. As noted, the usual treatments for SUI include placing a sling to either compress the urethral sphincter or to elevate or support the neck of the bladder defects.
Embodiments of the present invention can include apparatus and methods for treating urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and other pelvic defects or dysfunctions, in both males and females using one or more lateral implants to reinforce the supportive tissue of the urethra. The implants are configured to engage and pull (e.g., pull up) lateral urethral support (e.g., endopelvic fascia) tissue to cause the sub-urethral tissue to tighten and provide slack reduction for improved support. As such, the implants of such embodiments can be utilized to eliminate the need for mesh or other supportive structures under the urethra that is common with other incontinence slings. The implants can be shaped to facilitate such support, e.g., provided with anchoring end portions or configurable in “U,” “V” or like shapes. Further, one or more anchors or tissue engagement portions can be employed to attach and stabilize the implants to the tissue. Other embodiments of the present invention can include a supportive sling implant having one or more arm portions and a tensioning rod. Such embodiments can be provided in a traditional supportive configuration under the urethra, or laterally positioning with respect to the urethra, as described herein. In various such embodiments, the sling can include a tissue support portion having a first eyelet and a second eyelet, a first extension arm, and a second extension arm. The first extension arm can include an anchor portion and an opposing end adjustment element, with at least a length of the first extension arm adapted to slide through the first eyelet of the tissue support portion. Similarly, the second extension arm can include an anchor portion and an opposing end adjustment element, with at least a length of the first extension arm adapted to slide through the second eyelet of the tissue support portion.
The support portion can be included with one of the extension arms to provide a two-piece construct. For instance, the first extension arm and its corresponding support portion can include the eyelet and an anchoring portion. The second arm extension can slidably engage with the eyelet to define the elongate sling. Alternatively, the support portion can be a separate element of a three-piece construct. As such, the support portion for such embodiments can include two or more eyelets. Two separate extension arms can be included with such embodiments (e.g., each with anchors and adjustment elements), with each extension arm adapted to slidably engage with a respective eyelet of the separate support portion.
Certain embodiments of the implant or sling can include one or more indicia to assist in deployment, adjustment and tensioning of the implant or sling.
Embodiments of the present invention can provide smaller implants, fewer implant components, thus reducing the size and number of incisions, improving implant manipulation and adjustment, and the complexity of the insertion and deployment steps.
Referring generally to
Various embodiments of the present invention can include a tensioning or support implant device 30 having an extension portion 32 and one or more engagement portions 34, as shown in
In certain embodiments, the implant can be constructed in the form of a collapsible synthetic mesh patch, and can include an adhesive covering (e.g., fibron glue). Further, an umbrella-like feature can be included with wire splines or members extending from the patch. The umbrella-like feature can be connected with the patch via a connection structure, such as a ring, fastener, etc. A portion of the implant introducer (e.g., plunger and/or wire) can be configured to advance the patch and deploy and/or expand the umbrella-like feature to provide tissue engagement for the patch.
The one or more engagement portions 34 can be configured as fixating, or self-fixating, tips or anchors 34 adapted for penetration and fixation within target tissue or muscle (T) of the pelvic region. As shown in
In addition, a sheath or sleeve 40 can be selectively provided along a length of the extension portion 32 to facilitate introduction and insertion of the device 30 within the pelvic region of the patient, as depicted in
As detailed herein, various embodiments of the present invention are configured to treat urinary incontinence by providing support to the tissue or anatomical structure proximate or surrounding the urethra, rather than providing more conventional hammock-like support under the urethra. The device 30 and engagement aspects of the invention for such embodiments can vary greatly, as detailed herein.
As shown in
As depicted in
Structures or portions of the various embodiments detailed herein can be constructed of materials such as polypropylene, polyglycolide, poly-1-lactides, or other known biodegradable (re-absorbable) or non-biodegradable polymers. Further, growth factors or stem cells can be seeded or otherwise provided with one or more of the components of the device 30 to facilitate healing or tissue in-growth. In addition to introduction and deployment of the device 30 with a needle introducer device, a cannula or catheter system can be utilized as well.
The embodiment of
As shown in
The embodiments of
Each of the arms 82, 84 (e.g., distinct or separate members) can be passed through one or more vaginal incisions, along a retropubic pathway, until the anchor 88 is secured in tissue, such as the rectus fascia/muscle, as shown in
For those embodiments having an eyelet or aperture 90 to interconnect the arms 82, 84 or arm portions (e.g., 82a, 82b and 84), various tools (e.g., insertion and push tools), devices, mechanisms (e.g., grommets, and locking or adjustment elements), and techniques can be used to facilitate selective attachment and tensioning of the arms, including those disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0261955, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Embodiments of the present invention provide key advantages over fixed-length slings, thereby allowing treatment of a large range of patients with a wide range of anatomical dimensions with a single adjustable device.
Various sling devices 30, including those having one or more extension arms 82, 84 (e.g.,
A variety of materials may be used to form portions or components of the implants and devices 30, including Nitinol, polymers, elastomers, porous mesh, thermoplastic elastomers, metals, ceramics, springs, wires, plastic tubing, and the like. The systems, components and methods may have a number of suitable configurations known to one of ordinary skill in the art after reviewing the disclosure provided herein.
All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the teachings herein. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
This application is a Continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/618,102, filed on Jun. 8, 2017, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/697,525, filed on Apr. 27, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,867,685, which is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/335,472, filed on Dec. 22, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,017,243, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/060,467, filed on May 4, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,181, and which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/426,117, filed on Dec. 22, 2010, and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/060,467 claims priority to and the benefit of International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/054909, filed on Aug. 25, 2009, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/091,586, filed on Aug. 25, 2008; with each of the above-referenced applications being fully incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2738790 | Todt, Sr. et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3311110 | Singerman et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3384073 | Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Earl | Oct 1969 | A |
3580313 | Mcknight | May 1971 | A |
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3815576 | Balaban | Jun 1974 | A |
3858783 | Kapitanov et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4037603 | Wendroff | Jul 1977 | A |
4128100 | Wendroff | Dec 1978 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246660 | Wevers | Jan 1981 | A |
4441497 | Paudler | Apr 1984 | A |
4509516 | Richmond | Apr 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4775380 | Seedhom et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | OKeeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4932962 | Yoon et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5032508 | Naughton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250033 | Evans et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5403328 | Shallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5413598 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474518 | Farrer Velazquez | Dec 1995 | A |
5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
5518504 | Polyak | May 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520703 | Essig et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647836 | Blake, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683349 | Makower et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919232 | Chaffringeon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944732 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6031148 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071290 | Compton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099538 | Moses et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099551 | Gabbay | Aug 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | GilVernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168611 | Rizvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328744 | Harari et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | Van Der Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414179 | Banville et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482214 | Sidor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494906 | Owens | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530943 | Hoepffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602260 | Harari et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648921 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699175 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702827 | Lund et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752814 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802807 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884212 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911003 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971986 | Staskin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014607 | Gellman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037255 | Inman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048682 | Neisz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056333 | Walshe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083637 | Tannhauser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131943 | Kammerer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jacquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175591 | Kaladelfos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198597 | Siegel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226407 | Kammerer et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harai et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299803 | Kovac et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351197 | Montpetit et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357773 | Watschke | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364541 | Chu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371245 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393320 | Montpetit et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413540 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422557 | Arnal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431690 | Merade et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494495 | Delorme et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500945 | Cox et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513865 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527588 | Zaddem et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7588598 | Delorme et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722527 | Bouchier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Raff et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753839 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosley, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8968181 | Roll et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9017243 | Roll et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9687685 | Chmielewski | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9918816 | Roll et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10537416 | Roll | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004581 | Rousseau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039453 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Kammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000523 | Beraud | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004427 | Cervigni | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038451 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055104 | Arnal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245787 | Cox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015010 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028828 | Phillips | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122457 | Kovac et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173237 | Jacquetin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217589 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | Landgrebe et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080039678 | Montpetit et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045782 | Jimenez | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080300607 | Meade et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005634 | Rane et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110112357 | Chapman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20150164626 | Roll et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238297 | Roll et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002241673 | Aug 2005 | AU |
2404459 | Aug 2005 | CA |
2305815 | Aug 1974 | DE |
1220283 | May 1994 | DE |
19544162 | Apr 1997 | DE |
20016866 | Dec 2000 | DE |
10211360 | Oct 2003 | DE |
248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
643945 | Mar 1995 | EP |
650703 | May 1995 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1060714 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1342450 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2323586 | May 2011 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2852813 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2353220 | Feb 2001 | GB |
RM980239 | Oct 1999 | IT |
2001511686 | Aug 2001 | JP |
1225547 | Apr 1986 | SU |
1342486 | Oct 1987 | SU |
1993017635 | Sep 1993 | WO |
1993019678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
1995011631 | May 1995 | WO |
1995025469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
1997016121 | May 1997 | WO |
1997030638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
1997047244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
1998019606 | May 1998 | WO |
1998035606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998035616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998035632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998042261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
1998053746 | Dec 1998 | WO |
1999016381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
1999037217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
1999052450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
1999053844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
1999059477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2000013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2000018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
2000027304 | May 2000 | WO |
2000040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2000057812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2000064370 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2000066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2000074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2000074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2000074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2001006951 | Feb 2001 | WO |
2001026581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2001039670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001045588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001045589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001056499 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2002028312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002028315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002030293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002032284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002034124 | May 2002 | WO |
2002038079 | May 2002 | WO |
2002039890 | May 2002 | WO |
2002058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2002069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002089704 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2003017848 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2003028585 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003037215 | May 2003 | WO |
2003041613 | May 2003 | WO |
2003047435 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2003075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2003092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2003096929 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004034912 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005079702 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007011341 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007016083 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007027592 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
2007081955 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007146784 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
AlloSource Product Literature, 11 pages. |
Capio® CL Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device, The Capio CL Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device allows for a transvaginal suture fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, 2002, 8 pages. |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Monofilament and Multifilament Polypropylene Mesh—A Case report, Tyco Healthcare, United States Surgical, 4 pages. |
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, The tension-free Solution to Female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldw[de, 2002, 6 pages. |
IVS Tunneller, Australian Medical Design Breakthrough for GSI, mixed incontinence and vault prolapse, AMA Medical Products, 4 pages. |
IVS Tunneller, AMA, 4 pages. |
IVS Tunneller—A Universal instrument for anterior and posterior intra-vaginal tape placemen, TCO Healthcare, Aug. 2002, 4 pages. |
LigiSure Atlas™, Tyco Healthcare, Valleylab®, 2 pages. |
Intramesh L.I.F.T. Siliconized polyester, Cousin Biotech, 1 page. |
Intramesh® L.I.F.T.® Polypropylene Less Invasive Free Tape, Cousin Biotech, 2 pages. |
Mentor Porges, Uratape, ICS/IUGA Symp, Jul. 2002. |
Readjustable REMEEX System, Neomedic International, 8 Pages. |
SABRE™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor, May 2002, 4 pages. |
SABRE™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 2002, 6 pages. |
The McGuire™ Suture Guide: A Single Use Instrument Designed for the Placement of a Suburethral Sling, Bard, 2001, 2 pages. |
Urethrovaginal Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Correction of Stress Incontinence, Cystocele, and Prolapse, Am. J. Obst. & Gyn, vol. 31, 1961, pp. 281-290. |
UroMed Access Instrument System for the Sub-urethral Sling Procedure Catalog No. 120235, Directions for Use, 3 pages. |
We're staying ahead of the curve, Introducing the IVS Tunneller Device for Tension Free Procedures, Tyco Healthcare, 2002, 3 pages. |
Aldridge, Albert H., “Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 44, 1948, pp. 398-411. |
Amundsen et al., “Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women who Also Require a Pubovaginal Sling”, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, May 2003, pp. 1770-1774. |
Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Spension of the Vesical Neck”, Journal of Urology, 144, Aug. 1990, pp. 319-323. |
Asmussen et al., “Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry with a New Technique”, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 10, 1976, pp. 7-11. |
Beck et al., “Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence With Anterior Colporrhaphy”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 3, Mar. 1982, pp. 269-274. |
Benderev, Theodore V., “A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System”, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, Dec. 1994, pp. 2316-2320. |
Benderev, Theodore V., “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension”, Journal of Urology, 40, Nov. 1992, pp. 409-418. |
Bergman et al., “Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Study”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 173, No. 1, Jul. 1995, pp. 66-71. |
Blaivas, Jerry, “Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure”, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, 1990, pp. 93-101. |
Blaivas et al., “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, 145, Jun. 1991, pp. 1214-1218. |
Blaivas et al., “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment”, 1984, pp. 173-475. |
Boston Scientific, “Surgical Mesh Sling Kit”, Advantage AT™, 2002, 6 pages. |
Boyles et al., “Procedures for Urinary Incontinence in the United States”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 189, No. 1, Jul. 2003, pp. 70-75. |
Bryans, Fred E., “Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, Feb. 1979, pp. 292-294. |
Cervigni et al., “The Use of Synthetics in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, vol. 11, 2001, pp. 429-435. |
Choe et al., “Gore-tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later”, Ucology, vol. 54, 1999, pp. 641-646. |
Cook/OB GYN®, “Urogynecology”, Copyright Cook Urological Inc., 1996, pp. 1-36. |
Dargent et al., “Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, 2002, pp. 576-582. |
Das et al., “Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, Sep. 1995, pp. 1119-1121. |
Debodinance et al., “Tolerance of Synthetic Tissues in Touch With Vaginal Scars: Review to the Point of 287 Cases”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 87, 1999, pp. 23-30. |
Decter, Ross M., “Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, Aug. 1993, pp. 683-686. |
Delancey, John, “Structural Support of the Urethra as It Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 170, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 1713-1723. |
Delorme, Emmanuel, “Trans-obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, 2001, pp. 1306-1313. |
Diana et al., “Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse with Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy Using Prolene Mesh”, American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, Feb. 2000, pp. 126-128. |
Conquy, Dr. Sophie, “Le point sur I'incontinence urinaire”, Expertise et Practiques en Urologie, No. 3 [Hospital Cochin, Paris], pp. 17-19. |
Drutz et al., “Clinical and Urodynamic Re-evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, 1990, pp. 70-73. |
Eglin et al., “Transobturator Subvesical Mesh”, Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series, Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 31, Issue 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 14-19. |
Enzelsberger et al., “Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, 1990, pp. 51-54. |
Eriksen et al., “Long-term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, 1990, pp. 45-50. |
Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinence Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1966, pp. 133-137. |
Falconer et al., “Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp 2, 2001, pp. S19-S23. |
Farnsworth, “Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (Infracoccygeal Sacropexy) for Sever Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse—A Preliminary Report on Efficacy and Safety”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 13, 2002, pp. 4-8. |
Farquhar et al., “Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990-1997”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 99. No. 2, Feb. 2002, pp. 229-234. |
Fidela, et al., “Pelvic Support Defects and Visceral and Sexual Function in Women Treated With Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension and Pelvic Reconstruction”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6, Dec. 1996. |
Flood, C.G., “Anterior Colporrhaphy Reinforce With Marlex Mesh for the Treatment of Cystoceles”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, 1998, pp. 200-204. |
Gilja et al., “A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch)”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 153, May 1995, pp. 1455-1457. |
Gittes, Ruben F., “No-incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 138, Sep. 1987. |
Guner et al., “Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy for Marked Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse”, International Journal of Gynec & Obstetrics, vol. 74, 2001, pp. 165-170. |
Handa et al., “Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 6, Dec. 1996, 5 pages. |
Heit et al., “Predicting Treatment Choice for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, No. 6, Jun. 2003, pp. 1279-1284. |
Henriksson et al., “A Urodynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Urethroplasty in Women With Stress Incontinence”, Am J. Obstet Gynecol, vol. 131, No. 1, Mar. 1, 1978, pp. 77-82. |
Hodgkinson et al., “Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female”, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Henry Ford Hospital, vol. 10, No. 5, Nov. 1957, pp. 493-499. |
Holschneider et al., “The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-year Review”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 83, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 573-578. |
Horbach et al., “Instruments and Methods, A Suburethral Sling Procedure With Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients With Low Urethral Closure Pressure”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 71, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 648-652. |
Horbach, Nicollette, “Suburethral Sling Procedures”, Genuine Stress Incontinence, Chapter 42, pp. 569-579. |
Ingelman-Sunberg et al., “Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10, 1983, pp. 51-69. |
IVS Tunneller, “ein universelles Instrument fur die Intra Vaginal Schlingenplastik”, TCO Healthcare, 2001, 4 pages. |
Jeffcoate et al., “The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence”, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1956, pp. 36-39. |
Jones et al., “Pelvic Connective Tissue Resilience Decreases With Vaginal Delivery, Menopause and Uterine Prolapse”, Br J Surg, vol. 90, No. 4, Apr. 2003, pp. 466-472. |
Julian, Thomas, “The Efficacy of Marlex Mesh in The Repair of Sever, Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse of the Anterior Midvaginal Wall”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, No. 6, Dec. 1996, pp. 1472-1475. |
Karram et al., “Chapter 19 : Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse”, Urogyn-cology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, 1999, pp. 235-256. |
Karram et al., “Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling For Recurrent For Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence”, vol. 75, Mar. 1990, pp. 461-463. |
Kersey, “The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation in the Treatment of Stress Incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, Oct. 1983, pp. 945-949. |
Klutke et al., “The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magentic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, Mar. 1990, pp. 563-566. |
Klutke et al., “The Promise of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape for Female SUI”, Contemporary Urology, Oct. 2000, 7 pages. |
Klutke et al., “Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 2, Aug. 1996, pp. 294-296. |
Korda et al., “Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience”, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, May 1989, pp. 150-154. |
Kovac, S. Robert, “Follow-up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling Operation for Recurrent Urinary ncontinence (Kovac Procedure)”, Journal of Pelvic Surgery, May 1999, pp. 156-160. |
Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent—Urinary Incontinence”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 624-627. |
Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?”, Contemeorary OB/GYN, Feb. 1998, 10 pages. |
Kovac, Stephen Robert, M.D., Cirriculum Vitae, Jun. 18, 1999, pp. 1-33. |
Leach, Gary E., “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension”, Urology vol. XXXI, No. 5, May 1988, pp. 388-390. |
Leach et al., “Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, American Urological Association, vol. 158, Sep. 1997, pp. 875-880. |
Lightenstein et al., “The Tension Free Hemioplasty”, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 157, Feb. 1989, pp. 188-193. |
Loughlin et al., “Review of An 8-year Experience With Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, 1990, pp. 44-45. |
Luber et al., “The Demographics of Pelvic Floor Disorders: Current Observations and Future Projections”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, No. 7, Jun. 2001, pp. 1496-1503. |
Mage, “Technique Chirurgicale, L'interpostion D'un Treillis Synthetique Dans La Cure Par Voie Vaginale Des Prolapsus Genitaux”, J Gynecol Obstet Bioi Reprod, vol. 28, 1999, pp. 825-829. |
Marchionni et al., “True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse—Thirteen Years of Experience”, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 679-684. |
Marinkovic et al., “Triple Compartment Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy With Anterior and Posterior Mesh Extensions”, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 110, Mar. 2003, pp. 323-326. |
Marshall et al., “The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension”, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, 1949, pp. 509-518. |
Mascio, Valenzio C., “MITEK Brochure, Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Using Mitek Gill Anchors”. |
McGuire et al., “Abdominal Fascial Slings”, Slings, Raz Female Urology, 1996, pp. 369-375. |
McGuire, E J., “Abdominal Procedure for Stress Incontinence”, Urol Clin North Am., vol. 12, No. 2, May 1985, pp. 285-290. |
McGuire et al., “Experience With Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at the University of Michigan”, Journal of Urology, vol. 138, 1987, pp. 90-93. |
McGuire et al., “Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, vol. 119, No. 1, 1978, pp. 82-84. |
McGuire, Edward J., “The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Profiles in Urology, pp. 3-18. |
McIndoe et al., “The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Aust. N Z Journal of Obstet Gynecology, Aug. 1987, pp. 238-239. |
McKiel et al., “Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 96, No. 5, Dec. 1966, pp. 737-739. |
Migliari, Roberto, “Tension-free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior-vaginal Wall Prolapse”, Eur Urol, vol. 38, Oct. 1999, pp. 151-155. |
Migliari et al., “Treatment Results Using a Mixed Fiber Mesh in Patients With Grade IV Cystocele”, Journal of Urology, vol. 161, Apr. 1999, pp. 1255-1258. |
Moir et al., “The Gauze-Hammock Operation”, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of British Commonwealth, vol. 75, No. 1, Jan. 1968, pp. 1-9. |
Morgan et al., “A Sling Operation, Using Madex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence”, Am J. Obst. & Gynecol, Feb. 1970, pp. 369-377. |
Morgan, J.E., “The Marlex Sling Operation for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 16-year Review”, American Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 151, No. 2, Jan. 1998, pp. 224-226. |
Morley et al., “Sacrospinous Ligament Fixations for Eversion of the Vagina”, Am J Obstet Gyn, vol. 158, No. 4, Apr. 1988, pp. 872-881. |
Mouly et al., “Vaginal Reconstruction of a Complete Vaginal Prolapse: The Trans Obturator Repair”, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, Apr. 2003, pp. 183. |
Narik et al., “A Simplified Sling Operation Suitable for Routine Use”, Gynecological and Obstetrical Clinic, University of Vienna, vol. 84, No. 3, Aug. 1, 1962, pp. 400-405. |
Natale et al., “Tension Free Cystocele Repair (TCR): Long-term Follow-up”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 11, Supp. 1, Oct. 2000, pp. S51. |
Nichols, David H., “The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, Jan. 1973, pp. 88-93. |
Nicita, Giulio, “A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse”, Journal of Urology, vol. 160, Sep. 1998, pp. 741-745. |
Niknejad et al., “Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence”, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, 2002, pp. 597-611. |
Morris et al., “Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach”, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, Issue 3, Jun. 1996, pp. 227-230. |
O'Donnell, Pat, “Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and Mcguire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, Jan. 1992, pp. 389-392. |
Ostergard et al., “Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice”, 1996, pp. 569-579. |
Paraiso et al., “Laparoscopic Surgery for Enterocele, Vaginal Apex Prolapse and Rectocele”, Int. Urogx:necol J, vol. 10, 1999, pp. 223-229. |
Parra et al., “Experience with a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, British Journal of Urology, vol. 66, Issue 6, Dec. 1990, pp. 615-617. |
Pelosi et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 45-50. |
Pereyra, “A Simplified Surgical Procedure for the Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women”, West. J. Surg. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959, pp. 223-226. |
Pereyra et al., “Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 643-648. |
Petros et al., “An Analysis of Rapid Pad Testing and the History for the Diagnosis of Stress Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 71, 1992, pp. 529-536. |
Petros et al., “An Integral Theory and Its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supp. 153, 1993, 1 page. |
Petros et al., “Anchoring the Midurethra Restores Bladder-neck Anatomy and Continence”, The Lancet, vol. 354, Sep. 18, 1999, pp. 997-998. |
Petros, Peter E., “Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather Than Urethral Closure”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 37-39. |
Petros et al., “Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter”, Acta Obstet Gvnecol Scand, vol. 69, Supp 153, 1990, 75 pages. |
Petros, Peter, “Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 61-62. |
Petros, Peter, “Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery Preliminary Report”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1998, pp. 20-27. |
Petros et al., “Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(With Midline “Tuck”)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Supp. 153, 1993, pp. 69-71. |
Petros et al., “Integral Therory of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 7-31. |
Petros et al., “Medium-term Follow-up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time”, 1999, 3 pages. |
Petros, “New Ambulatory Surgical Methods Using an Anatomical Classification of Urinary Dysfunction Improve Stress Urge and Abnormal Emptying”, Int. Urogynecology Journal Pelvic Floor Dystfunction, vol. 8, 1997, pp. 270-278. |
Petros, Peter, “Part 1: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 5-28. |
Petros et al., “Part II: The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and Supporting Ligaments With Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 29-40 (Plus CoverSheet). |
Petros et al., “Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving From the Theory”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup. 153, 1993, pp. 41-52. |
Petros et al., “Part IV: Surgical Appliations of the Theory Development of the Intravaginal Sling Pklasty (IVS) Procedure”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 53-54. |
Petros et al., “Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup. 153, 1990, pp. 33-35. |
Petros et al., “Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup. 153, 1990, pp. 77-79. |
Petros et al., “The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-ligament”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 43-51. |
Petros et al., “The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation an Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69,Sup 153, 1990, pp. 53-59. |
Petros et al., “The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(With Bilateral “Tucks”)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 61-67. |
Petros et al., “The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 85-87. |
Petros et al., “The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 73-75. |
Petros et al., “The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics,Sup 153, 1993, pp. 77-79. |
Petros, Peter, “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 36, Issue 4, Nov. 1996, pp. 453-461. |
Petros et al., “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double Breasted”, Vaginal Flap Repair-attached Flap”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 81-84. |
Petros et al., “The Posterior Fornix Syn6rome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving From Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourlogy and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 89-93. |
Petros et al., “The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fomix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69,Sup 153, 1990, pp. 71-73. |
Petros et al., “The Tethered Vagina Syndrome Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69 Sup 153, 1990, pp. 63-67. |
Petros et al., “The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,vol. 69 Sup 153, 1990, pp. 41-42. |
Petros et al., “Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates from Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure”, Neurourology and Urodynamics vol. 14 No. 4, 1995, pp. 337-346. |
Petros, Peter, “Vault Prolapse II: Restoration of Dynamic Vaginal Supports by Infracoccygeal Sacropexy an Axial Day-case Vaginal Procedure”, Int Urogynecol J vol. 12, 2001, pp. 296-303. |
Petros et al., “An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 55-60. |
Petros et al., “Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex”, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, 1993, pp. 235-239. |
Petros et al., “Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 69-70. |
Petros et al., “Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation According to the Integrated Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Chapter 7, pp. 249-258. |
Pourdeyhimi, B, “Porosity of Surgical Mesh Fabrics: New Technology”, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. A1, 1989, pp. 145-152. |
Rackley, Raymond, “Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement”, Urology Times, 2000, pp. 46,48,49. |
Rackley et al., “Tension-free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures”, Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, No. 2, 2001, pp. 90-100. |
Rackley, Raymond, “The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Results in 206 Patients”, The Journal of Urology, 1992, pp. 845-846. |
Raz, Shlomo, “Female Urology”, 1996, pp. 80-86, 369-398 & 435-442. |
Raz, Shlomo, “Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence”, Urology vol. 17, No. 1, Jan. 1981, pp. 82-85. |
Richardson et al., “Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used In Urethropexy”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 29, No. 9, 1984, pp. 689-692. |
Richter, K, “Massive Eversion of the Vagina: Pathogenesis Diagnosis and Therapy of the “True” Prolapse of the Vaginal Stump”, Clin Obstet Gynecol, vol. 25, 1982, pp. 897-912. |
Ridley, John, “Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure”, American Journal Obst & Gynec, vol. 95,No. 5, Jul. 1, 1986, pp. 741-721. |
Roberts, Henry, “Cystourethrography in Women”, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, vol. XXXV, No. 293, 1952, pp. 253-259. |
Sanz et al., “Modification of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 496-500. |
Seim et al., “A Study of Female Urinary Incontinence in General Practice”, Demography, Medical History, and Clinical Findings,Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology,vol. 30, 1996, pp. 465-472. |
Sergent et al., “Prosthetic Restoration of the Pelvic Diaphragm in Genital Urinary Prolapse Surgery: Transobturator and Infacoccygeal Hammock Technique”, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 32, 2003, pp. 120-126. |
Sloan et al., “Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings”, The Journal of Urology,vol. 110, 1973, pp. 533-536. |
Spencer et al., “A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, 1987, pp. 411-415. |
Stamey, Thomas A., “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females”, Annals of Surgery vol. 192 No. 4, Oct. 1980, pp. 465-471. |
Stanton, Stuart L., “Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women”, Journal of American Geriatrics Society,vol. 38,No. 3, 1990, pp. 348-351. |
Stanton et al., “Surgery of Female Incontinence”, 1986, pp. 105-113. |
Staskin et al., “A Comparison of Tensile Strength among Three Preparations of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Human Fascia Lata Allografts”, 2 pages. |
Staskin et al., “The Gore-tex sling procedure for female sphincteric incontinence: indications, technique, and results”, World J of Urol. vol. 15 No. 5, 1997, pp. 295-299. |
Studdiford, William E., “Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1944, pp. 764-775. |
Subak et al., “Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 98, No. 4, Oct. 2001, pp. 857-863. |
Sullivan et al., “Total Pelvic Mesh Repair a Ten-Year Experience”, Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 44, No. 6, Jun. 2001, pp. 857-863. |
SUPORT™, “Sub-Urethral Perineal Retro-Pubic Tensionless Sling”, Matrix Medical (Pvt) Ltd, 1 page. |
Swift, S. E., “Case-Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Sever Pelvic Organ Prolapse”, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, 2001, pp. 187-192. |
T-SLING®, “Urinary Incontinence Procedure”, (Totally Tension-free) Hemiamesh, 2 pages. |
TVT, “Tension-free Vaginal Tape”, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 1999, 23 pages. |
Ulmsten et al., “A Multicenter Study of Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, 1998, pp. 210-213. |
Ulmsten et al., “A Three Year Follow up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, 1999, pp. 345-350. |
Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, May 1996, pp. 81-86. |
Ulmsten et al., “Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1987, pp. 455-457. |
Ulmsten et al., “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, 1995, pp. 75-82. |
Ulmsten et al., “The Unstable Female Urethra”, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 144 No. 1, Sep. 1, 1982, pp. 93-97. |
Ulmsten, U., “Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis a Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 6, 1995, pp. 2-3. |
VESICA®, “Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit”, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 1995, 4 pages. |
VESICA®, “Sling Kits”, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 1998, 4 pages. |
Villet et al., “Gynecolgie Obstetrique & Fertile”, vol. 31, 2003, p. 96. |
Visco et al., “Vaginal Mesh Erosion After Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, n. 3, pp. 297-302. |
Walters, Mark D., “Percutaneous Suburethral Slings: State of the Art”, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, Oct. 2001, 29 pages. |
Waxman et al., “Advanced Urologic Surgery for Urinary Incontinence”, The Female Patient, vol. 21, Mar. 1996, pp. 93-100. |
Weber et al., “Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: Review of Anatomy and Techniques of Surgical Repair”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 311-318. |
Webster, George D., “Female Urinary Incontinence”, Urologic Surgery, pp. 665-679. |
Webster et al., “Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, Sep. 1990, pp. 670-673. |
Winter, Chester C., “Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women”, Urology, vol. XX, No. 4, Oct. 1982, pp. 408-411. |
Winters et al., “Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Enterocele Repair in the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse”, Urology, vol. 56, supp. 6A, 2000, pp. 55-63. |
Woodside et al., “Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 135, Jan. 1986, pp. 97-99. |
Zacharin et al., “Pulsion Enterocele: Long-term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique”, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 55 No. 2, Feb. 1980, pp. 141-148. |
Zacharin, Robert, “The Suspensory Mechanism of the Female Urethra”, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 97, Part 3, 1963, pp. 423-427. |
Zimmern et al., “Four-Comer Bladder Neck Suspension”, Vaginal Surgery for the Urologist, vol. 2, No. 1, Apr. 1994, pp. 29-36. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/618,102, filed Jun. 8, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/060,467, filed May 4, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/335,472, filed Dec. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,525, filed Apr. 27, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200113664 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61426117 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61091586 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15618102 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16710833 | US | |
Parent | 14697525 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15618102 | US | |
Parent | 13335472 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14697525 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13060467 | US | |
Child | 13335472 | US |