The present invention relates to optical scanners and more specifically to a mirrored spinner with paired offset facets.
Typical bar code scanners use mirrored spinners to scan an incident laser beam into a series of ray fans. These fans, when projected onto a plane, produce a series of approximately straight curves (scan lines). Typically, the several facets of a mirrored spinner are inclined at different angles, so as to produce a set of spaced apart parallel lines. The length of these lines is proportional to the tangent of the facet scan angle and the distance between the spinner and the projection plane. Conventional spinners are regular polygons and produce sets of equal length scan lines.
In scanners incorporating conventional spinners for producing parallel horizontal scan lines for scanning vertically oriented bars and spaces and parallel vertical scan lines for scanning horizontally oriented bars and spaces, some of the vertical scan lines are redundant and wasted. The vertical lines fill the scan volume by their length, and do not require as much repetition.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a mirrored spinner with paired offset facets.
A mirrored spinner with paired offset facets is provided.
A mirrored spinner with paired offset facets for scattering a laser beam. The mirrored spinner includes a first number of mirrored facets, including a second number of pairs of offset mirrored facets.
With reference to
Mirrored spinner 16 directs the laser beam to pattern mirrors 18. Mirrored spinner 16 further directs light reflected from item 30 to collector 20. Motor 28 rotates mirrored spinner 16.
Pattern mirrors 18 produce scanning light beams for scanning bar code 32 on item 30. Pattern mirrors 18 further collect light reflected from item 30 and direct the reflected light to mirrored spinner 16.
Collector 20 collects the reflected light from mirrored spinner 16.
Detector 22 converts the reflected light into electrical signals based upon the intensity of the reflected light.
Control circuitry 24 controls operation of laser 12 and motor 28 and decodes bar code information contained within the electrical signals received from detector 22. Control circuitry 24 sends decoded bar code information to a computer 26, such as a retail terminal.
Referring to
Example mirrored spinner 16 includes two pairs of offset mirrored facets, 40, 42 and 44, 46. The offset nature of the facets in this example is defined relative to a polygon spinner with six equal sides. Facets 40 and 44 are oriented at a vertex angle θ1 from a line 64 through vertex 60 and normal to centerline 62. Facets 42 and 46 are oriented at vertex angle θ2 from a line 68 through vertex 66 and normal to centerline 62.
Any method of determining offset that produces different vertex angles θ1 and θ2 is envisioned. One example way of determining offset is to define an offset angle Δ, and substract it from one pair of facet angles and add it to another pair of facet angles.
For example, in a polygon spinner with six equal sides, all six sides have the same vertex angle of 30°. Vertex angle θ1 equals 30°−Δ, and vertex angle θ2 equals 30°+Δ. In the illustrated example, offset angle Δ is about 15°. Therefore, vertex angle θ1 is about 15°, and vertex angle θ2 is about 45°.
Facets 48 and 50 link the pairs of offset facets together. Facet 48 link facet 40 to facet 46. Facet 50 links facet 44 to facet 42.
With reference to
Mirrored facets 40, 46, and 50 contribute to production of scanning beams 78. Mirrored facets 42, 44, and 48 contribute to production of scanning beams 76. Scanning beams 76 and 78 may be interlaced or not.
Mirrored spinner directs scanning beams 70 towards pattern mirrors 18, which use portions of scanning beams 70 to produce scan lines 80. In this example, the portions are defined by reference lines 72, 73, 74, and 75.
With reference to
Scan pattern 80 further includes three left vertical scan lines 84 and three right vertical scan lines 86. Left vertical scan lines 84 use the portion of scanning beams 70 left of reference line 73. Mirrored facets 42, 44, and 48 contribute to production of left vertical scan lines 84.
Right vertical scan lines 86 use the portion of scanning beams 70 right of reference line 75. Mirrored facets 40, 46, and 50 contribute to production of right vertical scan lines 86.
Use of spinner 16 reduces the number of vertical scan lines on each side from six, as with a conventional spinner, to three. However, spinner 16 makes left and right vertical scan lines 84 and 86 longer than the vertical scan lines produced by a conventional spinner. Therefore, fewer vertical scan lines are required.
Advantageously, use of spinner 16 provides flexibility in pattern design. For many barcode scanner applications, generating fewer but longer vertical scan lines and generating additional scan lines in the center of the scan pattern results in a far superior scan pattern. To this end, additional pattern mirrors 18 may be added in order to devote laser power that would otherwise be used by a conventional spinner to generate six left and six right vertical scan lines to generate additional scan lines in the center of scan pattern 80.
Example scan pattern 80 further includes three left and three right diagonal scan lines 88 and 90. Use of spinner 16 makes left and right diagonal scan lines 88 and 90 longer than the diagonal scan lines produced by a conventional spinner.
Left diagonal scan lines 80 use the portion of scanning beams 70 between reference lines 72 and 73. Mirrored facets 42, 44, and 48 contribute to production of left diagonal scan lines 88.
Right diagonal scan lines 80 use the portion of scanning beams 70 between reference lines 74 and 75. Mirrored facets 40, 46, and 50 contribute to production of right diagonal scan lines 90.
Although particular reference has been made to certain embodiments, variations and modifications are also envisioned within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4003627 | Wu et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4018504 | Wu et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4413878 | Lettington | Nov 1983 | A |
5000529 | Katoh et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5484990 | Lindacher et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6104524 | Hisano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6237851 | Detwiler | May 2001 | B1 |
6693723 | Keithley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7304779 | Guldevall | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20030201326 | Bobba et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 8301718 | May 1983 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070295816 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |