This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT /IL2013/000035, filed Mar. 24, 2013, which claims priority to Israeli Patent Application No. 219010, filed Apr. 3, 2012. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to missile warheads especially unguided warheads designed to penetrate hard targets and in particular multiple wall targets.
Warheads are often required to penetrate hard concrete or steel targets of either one or multiple layers (walls) and to explode afterwards inside a target cavity. Such warheads have an ogive or a conical nose that assists the penetration by reducing the resistance forces.
This type of warhead is typically made of three sections: (1) a front section, or nose, which is usually in the shape of an ogive or cone; (2) the main section which includes the explosive charge and is usually cylindrical; and (3) the aft section which seals the explosive charge within the casing and holds a penetration fuse for explosive charge initiation.
The warhead which is typically a hollow cylindrically shaped casing, made of high strength steel. Inside the hollow casing lies the explosive charge, and in the rear end of the warhead the penetration fuse is installed. This fuse is designed to initiate the explosive charge at the proper moment, typically, at some predetermined time after the warhead encounters the target.
In penetration warheads, special care is given to the design of the forward penetration nose. The penetration nose must withstand considerable loads, and also, guides the warhead's path through the target (being the first part of the warhead to come in contact with the target), with minimal drag forces. The most widespread approach for penetration nose design is to use a conical or an ogive nose.
When the warhead hits the target at an oblique impact angles, and at the beginning of penetration, asymmetrical forces develop on the conical or ogive nose. Such forces create a rotation moment (torque) around the center of mass of the warhead and cause the warhead to move in a bent line instead of a straight line, or to ricochet, if the warhead hits at shallower impact angles.
This effect is called the J Effect which causes some or all of the following problems: (a) the warhead rotates during target penetration, generating considerable loads on the warhead that may lead to the structural failure of the warhead, (b) the warhead ricochets off the target when the strike angles are shallow, (c) the warhead potential penetration depth of a target is decreased due to bent penetration line, and (d) lateral accelerations acting on the fuse located in the rear part of the warhead increase; such accelerations may cause failure of the fuse during penetration.
The customary design approach to these problems is strengthening the warhead structure by increasing the thickness of the metal and/or changing the kind of metal from which the warhead is made, and strengthening and hardening the warhead fuse to withstand increased side accelerations. This approach has several limitations including an increase in the weight of the weapon system, which is undesirable, reduction of the internal volume for the explosive charge in the warhead and a more complicate design of the penetration fuse. As a result, the cost of the warhead-fuse system increases and its effectiveness decreases.
Another approach is to use a warhead with a blunt nose. This kind of nose reduces the J Effect by creating an opposing force at the beginning of the penetration which balances the moment (torque), but creates much bigger drag forces during the penetration. As a result of the bigger drag forces, some or all of the following problems may develop:
Thus, warheads of this kind are limited to strikes at relatively shallow angles and into relatively thin targets only.
In view of the above, an aim of the present invention is to provide an improved warhead that overcomes the drawbacks of the above warheads, i.e., a warhead with a nose having a shape which would reduce the J Effect in a situation of a strike at oblique angles, increase the penetration capability and reduce the loads on the warhead and the fuse, without significant increase of penetration drag.
Another aim of the present invention is to provide a missile warhead having high durability while penetrating multi-layered structural targets, without a significant increase in weight.
Yet, another aim of the present invention is to provide a warhead nose that prevents the warhead from ricocheting off structural targets and assists in target penetration, when shallow approach angles and high angles of attack are reached.
The present invention is to a penetration warhead having a conical nose and structural ribs along the circumference of the nose. The special penetration cone design gives the warhead the following characteristics:
Main parts of the penetration nose:
Structural ribs—these ribs may vary in size and even protrude out of the maximal outline of the warhead. The thickness and height of the ribs changes along the length of the warhead nose.
Penetration boss—a boss protruding from the tip of the penetration nose. This boss may be tapered. The boss is not an essential part of the penetration nose for some applications.
The ribs improve the capability of the warhead in the following aspects:
In contrast, warheads having a conical or an ogive nose, rotate after penetrating in oblique angles, reducing the potential penetration capability to hardened targets. In the case of multiple wall penetration, warheads with an ogive or conical nose rotate significantly after the first or second wall penetration, and thus, do not penetrate through the remaining walls.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, a warhead nose is provided comprising:
Furthermore a warhead nose is provided, comprising:
The ribs may be equidistantly spaced apart, and the nose may have a flat or concave tip.
The warhead nose further comprises a cylindrical and/or tapered boss the dimensions of which are determined by the following relations:
where,
Furthermore, a warhead is provided comprising:
As seen in
As can be seen in the figure, unlike the tapered cross section of nose 10, nose 20 has a rectangular cross section.
The optimized number of the ribs, their shape and dimensions are determined by simulating the penetration of warheads into desired targets. For example the relation between the front rib outer width (G) and the front rib root (I), can be optimized in order to increase or decrease the moment produced by the rib with the same drag. Another example—simulations have shown that a relatively long conical nose with structural ribs each having a relatively small circumference in comparison to the circumference of the warhead may best suit penetrations into relatively thick targets at a strike angle of between 45° to 90° relative to the target plane. In this case, the penetration depth (or exit velocity) into a relatively thick wall target at a strike angle of 90° relative to the target plane, will be equal to the depth reached by a warhead having the same nose but without the structural ribs. However, in case of oblique strike angles, the penetration depth of a warhead with structural ribs may be significantly better.
Where D is maximum nose diameter;
Tests consist of firing a warhead at the intended targets while recording the warhead's progression (speed and attitude) via high-speed cameras. Tests were conducted at various speeds and impact angles.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
219010 | Apr 2012 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2013/000035 | 3/24/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/150511 | 10/10/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
33863 | Woodbury | Dec 1861 | A |
2258281 | Dunajeff | Oct 1941 | A |
2356227 | Diehl | Aug 1944 | A |
3002453 | Fedor | Oct 1961 | A |
3200751 | Vitt | Aug 1965 | A |
3572250 | Kriesel et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3992998 | Cordle et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4301733 | Arciniega Blanco | Nov 1981 | A |
4305333 | Altenau et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4421032 | Rudolf et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4633782 | Berube et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4765245 | Berube et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5116224 | Kelsey, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
5133261 | Kelsey, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5509357 | Lawther | Apr 1996 | A |
5939662 | Bootes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6012393 | Tal | Jan 2000 | A |
6135028 | Kuhns et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6283036 | Munsinger | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6382105 | Jones | May 2002 | B1 |
H2025 | Munsinger | Jun 2002 | H |
6453790 | Cesulka et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494140 | Webster | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6581522 | Julien et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601517 | Guirguis | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20050109233 | Eches et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20100263566 | Ruhlman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2279325 | Jul 1999 | CA |
0161367 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0760458 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0845098 | Jun 1998 | EP |
427713 | Aug 1911 | FR |
2711786 | May 1995 | FR |
538276 | Jul 1941 | GB |
20010035741 | May 2001 | KR |
436607 | May 2001 | TW |
WO-9707379 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO-9935461 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO-2008118185 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008118235 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009045619 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009082518 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MBDA Validates CMP 1000 Penetrator Warhead, Press Release, Jan. 30, 2009, http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/newsFO—complet.php?lang=EN&news—id=269. |
Extended European Search Report mailed Nov. 20, 2015 regarding European Application No. 13772457.1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150059610 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |