The application relates generally to rotating airfoils for gas turbine engines, and more particularly to mistuned compressor rotors.
Aerodynamic and/or vibrational instabilities, such as but not limited to flutter, can occurs in a gas turbine engine when two or more adjacent blades of a rotor of the engine, such as the fan, vibrate at a frequency close to their natural frequency and the interaction between adjacent blades maintains and/or strengthens such vibration. Other types of aerodynamic instability, such as resonant response, may also occur and are undesirable. Prolonged operation of a rotor undergoing such instabilities can cause airfoil stress loads to exceed acceptable levels for operation. Various attempts have been made to mistune adjacent blades of such rotors so as to separate their natural frequencies and reduce the likelihood of undesirable instabilities. Some mistuning solutions, however, can cause non-uniform flow patterns to develop through the rotor.
There is accordingly provided a compressor rotor for a gas turbine engine, the compressor rotor comprising: a hub disposed about an axis of rotation and having an outer surface forming a radially inner gaspath boundary, the outer surface defining a nominal hub diameter; a circumferential array of blades extending radially outwardly from the hub, each blade extending along a span from the outer surface to a tip, and having a pressure side and a suction side each extending chord-wise between a leading edge and a trailing edge; a first inter-blade passage defined between a first set of adjacent blades of the circumferential array, the first inter-blade passage having a first throat area extending from the outer surface of the hub to a predetermined height along the span of the first set of adjacent blades; a second inter-blade passage defined between a second set of adjacent blades of the circumferential array, the second inter-blade passage having a second throat area extending from the outer surface of the hub to the predetermined height along the span, the second throat area smaller than the first throat area; and at least one scoop disposed in the second inter-blade passage, the at least one scoop defining a cavity extending radially into the outer surface of the hub relative to the nominal hub diameter.
There is also provided a gas turbine engine comprising: a bypass duct; and a compressor comprising: a hub disposed about an axis of rotation and having an outer surface forming a radially inner gaspath boundary, the outer surface defining a nominal hub diameter; a circumferential array of blades extending radially outwardly from the hub, each blade extending along a span from the outer surface to a tip, and having a pressure side and a suction side each extending along a chord between a leading edge and a trailing edge; a first blade, a second blade, and a third blade of the circumferential array of blades being disposed circumferentially adjacent to one another, a first inter-blade passage extending radially outwardly from the outer surface between the first and second blades, a second inter-blade passage extending radially outwardly from the outer surface between the second and third blades, the second blade having a maximum thickness greater than a corresponding maximum thickness of the first and third blades; and at least one scoop disposed in the second inter-blade passage, the at least one scoop defining a cavity extending radially into the outer surface of the hub relative to the nominal hub diameter.
There is further provided a method of reducing flow patterns disparities between at least a first and second inter-blade passages of a mistuned compressor for a gas turbine engine, the method comprising increasing a throat area of the second inter-blade passage to correspond to a throat area of the first inter-blade passage by extending at least one scoop into an outer surface of the compressor within the second inter-blade passage.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
As shown in more details in
The circumferential row of fan blades 24 of fan 12 includes two or more different types of fan blades 24, in the sense that a plurality of sets of blades are provided, each set having airfoils with non-trivially different shapes, which difference will be described in more details below and illustrated in further figures. The two or more different types of fan blades 24 are composed, in this example, of successively circumferentially alternating sets of fan blades, each set including at least first and second fan blades 28 and 30 (the blades 28 and 30 having profiles which are different from one another, as will be described and shown in further details below).
In the exemplarity embodiment of
Flow-induced resonance refers to a situation where, during operation, adjacent vibrating blades transfer energy back and forth through the air medium, which energy continually maintains and/or strengthens the blades' natural vibration mode. Fan blades have a number of oscillation patterns, any of which, if it gets excited and goes into resonance, can result in flow induced resonance issues.
The different profiles of the first and second fan blades 28 and 30 provide a natural vibrational frequency separation between the adjacent blades 28, 30, which may be sufficient to reduce or impede unwanted resonance between the fan blades 24. Regardless of the exact amount of frequency separation, the first and second fan blades 28 and 30 are therefore said to be intentionally “mistuned” relative to each other, in order to reduce the occurrence and/or delay the onset, of flow-induced resonance.
Referring to
In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
As shown in
In a particular embodiment, the inter-blade passage 26 extends radially from the outer hub surface 20 to a radius up to 20% of the span of the blade 24. In another embodiment, the inter-blade passage 26 extends radially up to a radius of 50% of the span of the blade 24. In yet another embodiment, the inter-blade passage 26 extends radially along the entire span of the blade 24.
In the exemplarity embodiment of
The first inter-blade passage 60 has a throat section 70 that is larger than a throat section 72 of the second inter-blade passage 62. Therefore, the working fluid flowing through the first inter-blade passage 60 can have a different flow distribution or pattern than the working fluid flowing through the second inter-blade passage 62. For example, the flow flowing through the smaller throat section 72 may accelerate relative to the flow flowing through the larger throat section 70. A difference in size between the throat sections defines a throat reduction. The throat reduction can be viewed as a partial flow “blockage”, caused by the increased thickness of the second blade 30, relative to the thickness of the first blade 28.
The fan 12 includes one or more hub scoops 76 that extend into the outer hub surface 20 within the inter-blade passages 26 to define a cavity. The term “hub scoop” as used herein refers generally to a concave or other depressed surface extending from the outer hub surface 20 (defining the radially inner boundary of the gas path) into the hub 22 of the fan 12 or compressor rotor to define the cavity between the inner boundary of the gas path and the concave or other depressed surface (e.g. the hub scoop 76). The hub scoop 76 can be any suitable surface depression of the outer hub surface 20 such as pockets, creases, grooves, slots, and the like. In the example mentioned above having the inter-blade passages types AA and BB in circumferentially successive alternation, the hub scoop 76 is defined between the pressure side 36 of the second blade 30 and the suction side 38 of the first blade 28 i.e., within the inter-blade passage 62 that has a throat reduction.
The hub scoop 76 has a shape that is configured to increase the throat section volume or area (i.e. when the throat section is considered to be the throat cross-section). The hub scoop 76 can be provided in the second inter-blade passage 62 to increase the volume or area of the throat section 72. In a particular embodiment, the hub scoop 76 increases the cross-sectional area of the throat section 72 by adding the cross-sectional area of the hub scoop 76 to the original cross-sectional area of the inter-blade passage 62. The hub scoop 76 can be located at or toward the leading edge 44 of the adjacent blades 24. In another particular embodiment, the hub scoop 76 is located at the chordwise location of the maximum blade thickness 56 or at the chordwise location of a region of the blade 24 containing the maximum blade thickness. This region of the blade 24 can extend along the span L and/or the chord of the blade. In a particular embodiment, the region containing the maximum blade thickness 56 extends from the maximum thickness 56 (shown in
In a particular embodiment, a volume of the hub scoop 76 corresponds to a volume of the throat reduction. In another embodiment, the volume of the hub scoop 76 is proportional to the volume of the throat reduction. For example, as the cross-sectional area or volume of the throat reduction increases, the cross-sectional area or volume of the hub scoop 76 proportionally increases to minimize nonuniform flow patterns through the inter-blade passages 26. The hub scoop 76 is generally located at the throat section of the inter-blade passage. For example, a maximum width of the hub scoop 76 can be positioned at a chordwise location of the smallest cross-section 64 of the throat section 72.
In the embodiment shown in
In a particular embodiment, the hub scoop 80 is wider than the hub scoop 78. In the embodiment shown in
In a particular embodiment, providing the hub scoops 78, 80 increases a volume of the first inter-blade passage 60 to correspond to a volume of the second inter-blade passage 62. In another particular embodiment, the throat cross-sectional area of the first inter-blade passage 60 at the throat section 70 including the cross-sectional area of the first hub scoop 78 corresponds to the throat cross-sectional area of the second inter-blade passage 62 at the throat section 72 including the cross-sectional area of the second hub scoop 80.
In a particular embodiment, the outer hub surface 20 is free of surface projections or elevations into the gas path. For example, the outer hub surface 20 remains a smooth circumferential surface except where the hub scoops 78, 80 are located. Along the outer hub surface 20 from blade 28 to blade 30, the outer hub surface 20 does not rise. In a particular embodiment where the outer hub surface rises (including projections, bulges and the like), a larger or additional hub scoops may be provided, as described above.
To reduce flow pattern disparities between the inter-blade passages 60, 62, the size of the throat section 70 within the first inter-blade passage 60 is increased to correspond to a the size of the throat section 72 of the second inter-blade passage 62. As mentioned above, the “size” as used herein can be the cross-sectional area of the throat section and/or the volume of the throat section, and thus the corresponding cross-sectional area and/or volume of the cavity formed by the hub scoop. This can be accomplished, for example, by providing the hub scoop 76 or 80 within the inter-blade passage 62. In a particular embodiment, the size of the hub scoop 76 is the same as the volume of the throat reduction. In another embodiment, the volume of the hub scoop 76 is proportional to the volume of the throat reduction.
Referring to
In this particular embodiment, a nominal hub diameter 92 of the hub 22 (also shown in
The first scoop 78 defines a cavity that extends radially into the outer surface 20 relative to the hub diameter 92 of the hub 22. The second scoop 80 also defines a cavity that extends radially into the outer surface 20 relative to the hub diameter 92 of the hub 22. As shown in
A cross-sectional area 94 of the scoop 80 may be said to be “in register” with the cross-sectional throat area 90, in that the cross-sectional area 94 of the scoop 80 is aligned and in communication with the cross-sectional throat area 90. The new “throat area” seen by the airflow is the total of the second throat area 90 and the cross-sectional area 94 of the scoop 80 that is in register with the second throat area 90. In use, the cross-sectional area 94 of the second scoop 80 compensates for the reduction of throat areas 86, 90 between the first inter-blade passage 60 and the second inter-blade passage 62. This compensation may provide a more uniform airflow through the fan 12.
In a particular embodiment, the cross-sectional area 94 of the scoop 80 is proportional to a differential between the first throat area 86 and the second throat area 90. That is, a total area of the first throat area 86 and a cross-sectional area 96 of the first scoop 78 is equal to, or substantially equal to, a total area of the second throat area 80 and the cross-sectional area 94 of the second scoop 80. In an alternate embodiment, the cross-sectional area 94 of the second scoop 80 can range inclusively between 50% to 150% of the differential between the throat areas 86 and 90. The throat in the inter-blade passage 26 is where the airflow generally chokes first. Thus, an increase of the cross-sectional area 94 of the second scoop 80 within the second inter-blade passage 62 may increase the area of the actual throat area seen by the airflow to minimize choking the airflow relative to only the second throat area 90 without the increase in the cross-sectional area 94 of the second scoop 80.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For example, other compressors of the engine can include the hub scoop(s) and the mistuned blades as described herein. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3536417 | Merkle et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3758233 | Newman | Sep 1973 | A |
4492522 | Rossmann et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4878810 | Evans | Nov 1989 | A |
5286168 | Smith | Feb 1994 | A |
5667361 | Yaeger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6042338 | Brafford et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059533 | Stoker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6379112 | Montgomery | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428278 | Montgomery et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471482 | Montgomery et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
7354243 | Harvey | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7690890 | Aotsuka | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7753652 | Truckenmueller et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8043063 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8540490 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8656589 | Kurt-Elli | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8727716 | Clements | May 2014 | B2 |
9097125 | Ghorbani et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9382916 | Schoenenborn | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9410436 | Kulathu et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20020064458 | Montgomery et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067991 | Montgomery et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050042384 | Benedetti et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070020101 | Balamucki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070175032 | Kurt-Elli | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080134504 | Schoenenborn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100247310 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110044818 | Kuhne | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120057982 | O'Hearn et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120148401 | Kulathu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130078084 | Gendrich et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130142659 | Glaspey | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170947 | Kurt-Elli et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189111 | Woehler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195652 | Pope | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130236319 | Rockarts et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140050590 | Ghorbani et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140090380 | Aggarwala | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150078908 | Calza | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150110604 | Calza et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139789 | Schoenenborn | May 2015 | A1 |
20150260046 | Broszat et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150322803 | Fulayter et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160017796 | Xu | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160076392 | Thomas | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160238034 | Fulayter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170159465 | Schlemmer et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170175761 | Schwarz et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170175776 | Theratil et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180038382 | Foster | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080450 | Glavicic | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190101002 | Duffin et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009033618 | Jan 2011 | DE |
1211382 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1211383 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1746249 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1813773 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1985803 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2014070279 | May 2014 | WO |
2014070279 | May 2014 | WO |
2015041758 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015041758 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued in EP 18194666.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194363.0 dated Feb. 11, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194668.2 dated Mar. 1, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194634.4 dated Jan. 29, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194666.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
Smith, Hubert—The Illustrated Guide to Aerodynamics. TAB Books. 2nd Edition, p. 21. (Year: 1992). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190085868 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |