The application relates generally to rotating airfoils for gas turbine engines, and more particularly to mistuned compressor rotors.
Aerodynamic and/or vibrational instabilities, such as but not limited to flutter, can occurs in a gas turbine engine when two or more adjacent blades of a rotor of the engine, such as the fan, vibrate at a frequency close to their natural frequency and the interaction between adjacent blades maintains and/or strengthens such vibration. Other types of aerodynamic instability, such as resonant response, may also occur and are undesirable. Prolonged operation of a rotor undergoing such instabilities can cause airfoil stress loads to exceed acceptable levels for operation. Various attempts have been made to mistune adjacent blades of such rotors so as to separate their natural frequencies and reduce the likelihood of undesirable instabilities.
In one aspect, there is provided a rotor for a gas turbine engine, the rotor comprising blades circumferentially distributed around a hub, the blades having airfoils with a span defined between a root and tip of the airfoils, the airfoils having a chord defined between a leading edge and a trailing edge of the airfoils, the airfoils having a thickness defined between a pressure side surface and suction side surface of the airfoils, the blades including first blades and second blades interleaved about the rotor, the airfoil of the first blades having a first thickness distribution along the span defining a first natural vibration frequency of the airfoils of the first blades, the airfoil of the second blades having a second thickness distribution along the span defining a second natural vibration frequency different than the first natural vibration frequency, the first thickness distribution being different than the second thickness distribution along a radially-inner half of the span, and the first thickness distribution matching the second thickness distribution along a radially-outer half of the span.
In another aspect, there is provided a fan for a gas turbine engine, the fan comprising blades circumferentially distributed around a hub, the blades having airfoils with a span defined between a root and tip of the airfoils, the airfoils having a chord defined between a leading edge and trailing edge of the airfoils, the airfoils having a thickness defined between a pressure side surface and suction side surface of the airfoils, the blades including first blades and second blades interleaved about the rotor, the airfoil of the first blades having a first thickness distribution along the span defining a first natural vibration frequency of the airfoils of the first blades, the airfoil of the second blades having a second thickness distribution along the span of the airfoil defining a second natural vibration frequency different than the first natural vibration frequency, the first thickness distribution being different than the second thickness distribution along a radially-inner half of the span, the first thickness distribution matching the second thickness distribution along a radially-outer half of the span.
In a further aspect, there is provided a method of forming a rotor of a gas turbine engine, the method comprising: providing first blades and second blades, the first blades having a first thickness distribution defining a first natural vibration frequency, the second blades having a second thickness distribution defining a second natural vibration frequency different than the first natural vibration frequency, the first thickness distribution being different than the second thickness distribution along a radially-inner half of the first and second blades, the first thickness distribution matching the second thickness distribution along a radially-outer half of the first and second blades; positioning at least one of the second blades relative to a hub of the rotor to be circumferentially between two of the first blades; and fastening the first and second blades to the hub.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
As shown in more detail in
The circumferential row of fan blades 24 of the fan 12 includes two or more different types of fan blades 24, in the sense that a plurality of sets of fan blades are provided, each set having airfoils with non-trivially different shapes, which difference will be described in more details below and illustrated in further figures. Flow-induced resonance refers to a situation where, during operation, adjacent vibrating blades transfer energy back and forth through the air medium, which energy continually maintains and/or strengthens the blades' natural vibration mode. Fan blades have a number of oscillation patterns, any of which, if it gets excited and goes into resonance, can result in flow induced resonance issues. The two or more different types of fan blades 24 are composed, in this example, of successively circumferentially alternating sets of fan blades, each set including at least a first blade 28 and a second blade 30 (the first and second blades 28,30 respectively have airfoils 31,33 which are different from one another, as described in further detail below). The different profiles of the first and second blades 28,30 provide a natural vibrational frequency separation or difference between the adjacent blades 28,30, which may be sufficient to reduce or impede unwanted resonance between the blades. Regardless of the exact amount of frequency separation, the first and second fan blades 28,30 are therefore said to be intentionally “mistuned” relative to each other, in order to reduce the occurrence and/or delay the onset, of flow-induced resonance.
In the exemplarity embodiment of
The embodiment of
The airfoil 31 of the first blade 28 has a first thickness distribution, and the airfoil 33 of the second blade 30 has a second thickness distribution. Each of the first and second thickness distributions is the profile of the thickness T of the first and second blades 28,30, respectively, spread over the span S of the first and second blades 28,30. The first and second thickness distributions provide a different profile to the first and second blades 28,30, respectively, and thus provide a natural vibrational frequency separation or difference between the adjacent blades 28,30. Stated differently, the first thickness distribution defines a first natural frequency for the first blades 28 that is different than a second natural frequency of the second blades 30 defined by the second thickness distribution. The first and second fan blades 28,30 are therefore “mistuned” relative to each other by varying the thickness T along the span S of the first and second blades 28,30.
As shown in
In the depicted embodiment, the thickness distributions 41,42 of the airfoils 31,33 along the radially-inner half of the span S extend between a 0% span position at the root 34 of the airfoils 31,33 and a 45% span position. The distribution of the thickness T therefore varies along a segment of the airfoils 31,33 from their roots 34 to roughly mid span S. The thickness T of the airfoils 31,33 in the depicted embodiment is therefore only varied along their “lower” or radially-inner portions which are expected to be less aerodynamically sensitive than other portions of the first and second blades 28,30. Still referring to
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the value of t-max for the airfoil 31 at a given location on the span S may be different from the value of t-max for the airfoil 33 at the same location on the span S. Stated differently, the value of t-max at some span-wise locations varies between the first and second blades 28,30. At the roots 34 of the airfoils 31,33, a position corresponding to roughly 0% of the span S, t-max is located at a first position on the chord C of about 35% of the chord C, as shown in the first planes 31′,33′. At the tips 35 of the airfoils 31,33, a position corresponding to roughly 100% of the span S, t-max is located at a second location on the chord C of about 55% of the chord C, as shown in the second planes 31″,33″. In the depicted embodiment, therefore, t-max is at the same location on the chord C for both the first and second blades 28,30 at theirs roots 34 and their tips 35. It can thus be appreciated that the maximum thickness t-max for each airfoil 31,33 shifts towards the trailing edges 37 of the airfoils 31,33 radially-outwardly from their roots 34. The chord C location of t-max therefore shifts toward the trailing edge 37 as the span S increases radially-outwardly, from the root 34 to the tip 35 of the airfoils 31,33.
As can be seen by comparing
Referring to
The rotor disclosed herein has A and B mistuned blades 28,30 for use on a single rotor, where the frequency separation of the blades 28,30 is accomplished by having different t-max and thickness distributions 41,42 in the lower half of the span S.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3536417 | Merkle et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3758233 | Newman | Sep 1973 | A |
4492522 | Rossmann et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5286168 | Smith | Feb 1994 | A |
5667361 | Yaeger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6042338 | Brafford et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059533 | Stoker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6379112 | Montgomery | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7354243 | Harvey | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7690890 | Aotsuka et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8043063 | Kelly | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8727716 | Clements et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9097125 | Ghorbani Zarimahalleh et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9650915 | Calza | May 2017 | B2 |
20020064458 | Montgomery et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067991 | Montgomery et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20070020101 | Balamucki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080134504 | Schoenenborn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100247310 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110044818 | Kuhne et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120057982 | O'Hearn et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120148401 | Kulathu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130078084 | Gendrich et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130142659 | Glaspey | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170947 | Kurt-Elli et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189111 | Woehler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195652 | Pope | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140050590 | Ghorbani et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140090380 | Aggarwala et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150110604 | Calza et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139789 | Schoenenborn | May 2015 | A1 |
20150260046 | Broszat et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150322803 | Fulayter et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160017796 | Xu et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160238034 | Fulayter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170159465 | Schlemmer et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170175761 | Schwarz et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170175776 | Theratil et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180038382 | Foster | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080450 | Glavicic | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180231021 | Wilson | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190101002 | Duffin et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009033618 | Jan 2011 | DE |
1211382 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1211383 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1746249 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1813773 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1985803 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2014070279 | May 2014 | WO |
2015041758 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Smith, Hubert. The Illustrated Guide to Aerodynamics. TAB Books. 2nd Edition. p. 21. (Year: 1992). |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194634.4 dated Jan. 29, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194363.0 dated Feb. 11, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194668.2 dated Mar. 1, 2019. |
European Search Report of Application No. 18194666.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190085704 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |