The present application relates in general to wellbore operations and more specifically to systems and methods for mitigating the shock from perforating gun detonations in a wellbore.
Perforating guns are utilized in subterranean wells to create perforating tunnels to promote fluid communication between the wellbore and the surrounding subterranean formation. One drawback of perforating guns is that the shock from the detonated explosive charges can damage downhole equipment.
Accordingly, methods, apparatus, devices and systems for mitigating the shock from detonated perforating charges are provided. One embodiment of a method for mitigating the shock from the detonation of a perforating charge in a subterranean wellbore includes the steps of disposing a mitigation tool in the wellbore; detonating the perforating charge in the wellbore; and activating the mitigation tool to create a fluid hammer.
An embodiment of a wellbore tool includes a tubular body having a top end, a bottom end, and a chamber; a barrier disposed proximate the bottom end in communication with the chamber; and an actuator connected with the body, the actuator opening a port in the body providing fluid communication with the chamber when activated.
An embodiment of a wellbore tool string includes a perforating gun having a plurality of explosive perforating charges and a shock mitigation tool. The shock mitigation tool including a tubular body having a top end, a bottom end, and a chamber; a barrier disposed proximate the bottom end in communication with the chamber; and at least one actuator connected with the body proximate to the top end of the body, the at least one actuator opening at least one port in the body providing fluid communication with the chamber when the at least one actuator is activated.
The foregoing has outlined some of the features and technical advantages of the present application in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims.
The foregoing and other features and aspects will be best understood with reference to the following detailed description, when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Refer now to the drawings wherein depicted elements are not necessarily shown to scale and wherein like or similar elements are designated by the same reference numeral through the several views.
As used herein, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; and other like terms indicating relative positions to a given point or element are utilized to more clearly describe some elements of the embodiments. Commonly, these terms relate to a reference point as the surface from which drilling operations are initiated as being the top point and the total depth of the well being the lowest point.
Perforating gun 14 includes a plurality of shaped perforating charges 22. Perforating gun 14 is fired, detonating perforating charges 22 creating tunnels 24 through casing 20 and into the surrounding subterranean formation 26. Tunnels 24 are created to promote fluid communication between wellbore 16 and formation 26. In some circumstances, the desired gun 14 configuration can cause damage to wellbore equipment, including well completion systems and tool string equipment, upon firing of perforating charges 22. This can be of particular concern when long guns are desired to shoot an extended portion of the well.
Tool string 12 includes mitigation tool 10 to provide a fluid dampening of the shock produced from the firing of gun 14. In the embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment, mitigation tool 10 is illustrated as positioned adjacent to perforating gun 14. However, it is noted that mitigation tool 10 may be spaced apart from gun 14 in some embodiments. It will also be seen that more than one mitigation tool 10, or mitigation tool section, may be provided in tool string 12.
Body 28 provides an internal chamber 30, illustrated in
One or more actuators 32 are positioned proximate to top end 28a. Actuators 32 are adapted to open ports 38 (
Barrier 34 is positioned proximate to bottom end 28b. Barrier 34, in some embodiments, may be moved between a closed position blocking passage through the bore of tool string 12 and an open position. In other embodiments, barrier 34 may be fixed in a closed or blocking position.
Mitigation tool 10 is activated, or fired, in response to the firing of gun 14 and detonation of perforating charges 22. Mitigation tool 10 may be fired at a selected delay after detonation of perforating charges 22, substantially simultaneous with firing of gun 14, or prior to firing gun 14 and the detonation of perforating charges 22. Upon activation of mitigation tool 10, actuators 32 form ports 38 (
The volume of chamber 30 may vary, as desired, to achieve a desired amount of force generated by the fluid hammer. In some embodiments, actuators 32 are selected to open one or more ports 38 that create an area of flow substantially equal to the cross-sectional area of chamber 30. Additionally, the distance between actuators 32, and therefore ports 38, and barrier 34 may vary between installations to change the force of fluid 5 striking barrier 34.
From the foregoing detailed description of specific embodiments, it should be apparent that methods and devices for mitigation perforating shock that are novel have been disclosed. Although specific embodiments have been disclosed herein in some detail, this has been done solely for the purposes of describing various features and aspects, and is not intended to be limiting with respect to the scope of the claims. It is contemplated that various substitutions, alterations, and/or modifications, including but not limited to those implementation variations which may have been suggested herein, may be made to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope defined by the appended claims which follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2154768 | Otis | Apr 1939 | A |
3163112 | Rhea | Dec 1964 | A |
3709294 | Kilgore | Jan 1973 | A |
3923105 | Lands | Dec 1975 | A |
3923106 | Bosse | Dec 1975 | A |
3923107 | Dillard | Dec 1975 | A |
5067568 | Yates | Nov 1991 | A |
5088557 | Ricles | Feb 1992 | A |
5366013 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
6412415 | Kothari | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460463 | Parrott | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523474 | Parrott | Feb 2003 | B2 |
7451819 | Chang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20040168805 | Fripp | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231840 | Ratanasirigulchai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
488875 | Jan 1997 | EP |
2277762 | Nov 1994 | GB |
2375383 | Nov 2002 | GB |
2390626 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2430686 | Apr 2007 | GB |
0158832 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2007036722 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100147519 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |