Mixers (sometimes alternatively referred to as “blenders”) are generally employed to disperse powdered chemicals into fluids. One application for mixers is in wellbore operations, for example, in preparing hydraulic fracturing fluid for injection into a subterranean formation. Generally, the fracturing fluid includes gelling agents, powders and other granular material, e.g., guar gum, which are initially dispersed into the fluid via the mixer, and subsequently hydrated, e.g., in tanks, to result in the desired viscosity for the fluid.
Certain powder and granular material mixers include a centrifugal pump and eductor, or a centrifugal or high or low shear blender for dispersing the powder and granular material into fluid (e.g., water). Generally, the fluid is pumped by the pump into a mixing chamber. In eductor mixers, the mixing chamber may be proximal to a throat of a converging-diverging nozzle such that the eductor draws the powder into the mixing chamber by the Venturi effect. In blender mixers, the blender is located in the mixing chamber, and the powders and grains are fed thereto, e.g., by gravity. In either case, the materials, e.g., in the form of dry powder, are introduced to the mixing chamber, and are dispersed into the fluid. Various devices are employed to avoid air entrainment during the dispersion process, or entrained air may be removed downstream, e.g., using a hydro-cyclone or another type of air separator. The fluid mixture may then be sent to equipment downstream for further hydration.
One challenge in dispersing powder additives such as gelling agents is that the powders may tend to agglomerate into clumps, sometimes referred to as “fisheyes.” The powders may have cohesive properties, such that partially-hydrated balls form, e.g., with dry powder surrounded by a “skin” of partially-hydrated powder. This skin prevents hydration of the dry powder within, resulting in a stable fisheye in the fluid, rather than an even dispersion of the powder. As such, suboptimal mixing may result, which can affect downstream application. Moreover, there is an additional risk of buildup and/or clogging of the material, e.g., in the various throats of the system, if the materials are not sufficiently wetted at the point of introduction into the mixer.
Accordingly, in some instances, a pre-wetter may be employed to mitigate the risk of such clumping. Pre-wetters generally provide a fluid to the powder feed, upstream of the mixing. However, pre-wetters require a separate pump to deliver the fluid to the powder, upstream of the mixing chamber. Thus, additional pumping equipment (i.e., centrifugal pumps to provide fluid to pre-wetter) may complicate the overall system, adding costs, maintenance, and failure points. Moreover, the different pieces of equipment may limit the range of flowrates achievable for the system, limiting the applications for which a single size or configuration of mixer is suitable.
Embodiments of the disclosure may provide a mixer that includes an impeller, a slinger, and a flush line. The impeller and slinger may be disposed in a back-to-back arrangement as part of an impeller/slinger assembly, and may be rotated via a connection with a shaft. The impeller draws fluid into the mixing chamber via a fluid inlet, pressurizes the fluid, and expels the fluid downward and outward. The fluid is then turned toward the slinger. The slinger may, through an additive inlet, receive additives that are to be mixed into the fluid, and may propel the additives radially outward, so as to mix the additives with the fluid.
The flush line may include an opening in the mixing chamber at a relatively high-pressure region of the mixing chamber, for example, near the impeller. The relatively high-pressure region may also be an area of relatively clean fluid (e.g., low concentration of additives) that may be tapped by the flush line. The flush line may extend to an additive-channeling structure (e.g., a cone or other type of hopper) through which the additives are received into the additive inlet. Using the pressure of the fluid in the mixing chamber, as provided by the impeller, the flush line may channel the relatively clean fluid from the mixing chamber to the additive-channeling structure, so as to pre-wet the additive, thereby reducing the potential for clumping.
While the foregoing summary introduces one or more aspects of the disclosure, these and other aspects will be understood in greater detail with reference to the following drawings and detailed description. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be limiting on the disclosure.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the present teachings and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present teachings. In the figures:
It should be noted that some details of the figures have been simplified and are drawn to facilitate understanding of the embodiments rather than to maintain strict structural accuracy, detail, and scale.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings and the following description, like reference numerals are used to designate like elements, where convenient. It will be appreciated that the following description is not intended to exhaustively show all examples, but is merely exemplary.
As schematically depicted, the mixer 104 may include a housing 107 as well as a fluid inlet 108 and an additive inlet 110 extending through the housing 107. The fluid inlet 108 may be coupled with the fluid source 102 and may be configured to receive fluid (i.e., the process fluid) therefrom. The additive inlet 110 may generally include an additive-receiving structure 111, which may be or include a cone, chamber, bowl, hopper, or the like, having an inner surface 115 configured to receive an additive 113, which may be a dry powder, and direct it into the housing 107, e.g. via gravity feed.
It will be appreciated that any dry, partially dry, crystalized, slurry, fluid, or pelletized, and/or packaged additive may be dispersed or otherwise mixed into the fluid using the mixer 104 via the additive inlet 110, as schematically depicted. Further, as will be described in greater detail below, additives received through the additive inlet 110 may be pre-wetted into a partial slurry, e.g., to avoid fisheyes and/or any material buildup. In particular, in various embodiments, the mixer 104 may be configured for use in mixing sand, guar, other powders, etc. with the fluid. Further, in some cases, the mixer 104 may be configured for use as a macerator, which may tear apart fibers, pouches containing powders, pellets, etc. for dispersion of its contents into the fluid. In at least one case, the mixer 104 may be configured for use in creating gel for use in fracturing operations, e.g., in a wellbore; however, the mixer 104 may be employed for any number of different uses, consistent with the present disclosure.
The mixer 104 may also include an impeller/slinger assembly 112, which may be driven by a shaft 114. The housing 107 may define a mixing chamber 118 therein that is in communication with the inlets 108, 110. The impeller/slinger assembly 112 may be disposed in the mixing chamber 118. Rotation of the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may pump the fluid from the source 102 through the mixing chamber 118 and into the outlet 121.
As shown, the shaft 114 may extend upwards, through the inlet 110 and out of the additive-receiving structure 111; however, this is but one example among many contemplated. In another example, the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may extend downward through the bottom of the housing 107, may be magnetically driven, driven internally within the mixing chamber 118, or may be otherwise disposed in the housing 107. The shaft 114 may be coupled with the impeller/slinger assembly 112, such that rotation of the shaft 114 rotates the impeller/slinger assembly 112. In various cases, the shaft 114 may be directly coupled to the impeller/slinger assembly 112, e.g. via a bolt; however, in other cases, gears, linkages, other speed-changing devices, or couplings may be employed to connect the shaft 114 to the impeller/slinger assembly 112.
The mixer 104 may also include a stator 120, which may be in the form of a ring, arcuate portion, etc., which may be disposed around the impeller/stator assembly 112, as will be described in greater detail below. Further, the mixer 104 may include an outlet 121 and a flush line 122. The outlet 121 may receive a slurry formed from a combination of the additive received through the additive inlet 110 and the fluid received through the fluid inlet 108. The outlet 121 may direct the slurry to one or more conduits 124, which may carry the fluid to the downstream equipment 106.
The flush line 122 may communicate with an area of the mixing chamber 118 that is proximal to the impeller/slinger assembly 112 on one end, and with the additive-receiving structure 111 on the other end. Accordingly, the flush line 122 may tap the process fluid from the mixing chamber 118 at an area of relatively high pressure and deliver it to the inner wall of the additive-receiving structure 111, which may be at a reduced (e.g., ambient) pressure. In addition to being at the relatively high pressure, the fluid tapped by the flush line 122 may be relatively “clean” (i.e., relatively low additives content, as will be described below), so as to pre-wet fluid to the additive-receiving structure 111 and promote the avoidance of clumping of the additives. In some cases, the flush line 122 may provide the pre-wetting fluid without requiring additional pumping devices (apart from the pumping provided by the impeller/slinger assembly 112) or additional sources of fluid or lines from the source 102. In other examples, booster pumps, etc., may be provided in addition to or in lieu of tapping the fluid from the mixing chamber 118.
The upper housing portion 126 may be coupled with the additive-receiving structure 111 and may provide the additive inlet 110. The lower housing portion 128 may include the fluid inlet 108, which may extend through the lower housing portion 128 to a generally centrally-disposed opening 133. In an embodiment, the opening 133 may be defined in the interior surface 139. In addition, the outlet 121 may extend from the mixing area 130, for example, including a substantially tangential conduit 135 extending from an opening 137 communicating with the mixing area 130.
Turning to the impeller/slinger assembly 112 disposed in the mixing chamber 118, the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may include a slinger 134 and an impeller 136. The slinger 134 and the impeller 136 may have inlet faces 134-1, 136-1, respectively, and backs 134-2, 136-2, respectively. The inlet faces 134-1, 136-1 may be each be open (as shown) or at least partially covered by a shroud, which forms an inlet in the radial inner part of the slinger 134 and/or impeller 136. Moreover, the inlet faces 134-1, 136-1 may be oriented in opposite directions, e.g., to receive fluid and/or dry components. The backs 134-2, 136-2 may be disposed proximal to one another and, e.g., coupled together, such that, for example, the impeller 136 and the slinger 134 are disposed in a “back-to-back” configuration.
In an embodiment, the inlet face 134-1 of the slinger 134 may face the additive inlet 110 (e.g., the additive-receiving structure 111), while the inlet face 136-1 of the impeller 136 may face the fluid inlet 108 (e.g., the opening 133), as shown. For example, the inlet face 136-1 of the impeller 136 may face the interior surface 139, with the opening 133, defined on the interior surface 139, being aligned with a radial middle of the impeller 136.
Accordingly, as defined by the direction in which the inlet faces 134-1, 136-1 are oriented, the slinger 134 may face upwards, as shown, but in other embodiments may face downwards or in a lateral direction. Similarly, the impeller 136 may face downwards, as shown, but in other embodiments, may face upwards or in a lateral direction. Further, the slinger 134 and the impeller 136 may each have a radius, with the radius of the slinger 134 being larger than the radius of the impeller 136. The radii of the slinger 134 and impeller 136 may be dependent upon one another, so as to control a position of a fluid-air boundary, as will be described in greater detail below.
The slinger 134 may further define a saucer-shape, as shown, i.e., formed generally as a flatter (or flat) middle with arcuate sides and the inlet face 134-1. In an embodiment, the sides may be formed, for example, similar to, or as part of a torus that extends around the middle of the slinger 134. In another embodiment, the slinger 134 may be bowl-shaped (e.g., generally a portion of a sphere). Further, the slinger 134 may include slinger blades 138 on the inlet face 134-1. The number of blades 138 may range from about two blades to about 20 blades, for example, about nine blades. In some cases, the blades 138 may be curved circumferentially as proceeding radially outwards from the shaft 114, but in others the blades 138 may be straight, as shown. When rotated, the slinger 134 may be configured to propel fluid and/or dry additives received from the inlet 110 radially outwards by interaction with the blades 138 and upwards (as shown), e.g., as influenced by the shape of the slinger 134.
Although not visible in
The flush line 122 may include an opening 140 defined in the lower housing portion 128 proximal to this region of high pressure. For example, the opening 140 may be defined in the interior surface 139 at a position between the outer radial extent of the impeller 136 and the opening 133 of the inlet 110. In other embodiments, the opening 140 may be disposed on the interior surface 139 and radially outside of the impeller 136 and/or elsewhere in the mixing chamber 118. The flush line 122 may also include a conduit 142, which may be or include one or more pipes, tubes, hoses, flow restrictors, check valves, etc. The conduit 142 may connect with a cone inlet 144 defined, for example, substantially tangent to the additive-receiving structure 111, such that fluid is transported from the opening 140 via the conduit 142, through the cone inlet 144, and into the additive-receiving structure 111. The fluid may then take a generally helical path along the interior of the additive-receiving structure 111, until it is received through the additive inlet 110 to the slinger 134. As such, the fluid received through the cone inlet 144 may generally form a wall of fluid along the inner surface 115 of the additive-receiving structure 111.
In at least one specific embodiment, a pressure gradient may develop between the impeller 136 and the lower housing portion 128, with the pressure in the fluid increasing as proceeding radially outwards from the opening 133. Another gradient, related to the concentration of the additives in the fluid may also develop in this region, with the concentration of additives increasing as proceeding radially outward. In some cases, a high pressure head and low concentration may be desired, so as to provide a flow of relatively clean fluid through the flush line 122, propelled by the impeller/slinger assembly 112. Accordingly, the opening 140 for the flush line 122 may be disposed at a point along this region that realizes an optimal tradeoff between pressure head of the fluid and concentration of the additives in the fluid received into the flush line 122. Additional details regarding the tradeoff are provided below.
Turning again to the stator 120, the stator 120 may form a shearing ring, which may be received around the radial outside of the impeller/slinger assembly 112 and in the mixing chamber 118 (
The first annular portion 146 may be configured to minimize flow obstruction. As shown, in some cases, the first annular portion 146 may include a shroud 150 and posts 152 defining relatively wide slots 154, allowing relatively free flow of fluid therethrough. In other embodiments, the first annular portion 146 may omit the shroud 150, as will be described in greater detail below.
While the first annular portion 146 may minimize flow obstruction, the second annular portion 148 may be configured to maximize flow shear, so as to promote turbulent mixing, and thus may include a series of stator vanes 156 that are positioned closely together around the stator 120. Narrow flowpaths 158 may be defined between stator vanes 156; however, the sum of areas of the flowpaths 158 may be less than the sum of the areas of the stator vanes 156. In various embodiments, the ratio of the stator vane 156 cross-sectional area (i.e., the area that obstructs flow) to the area of the flowpaths 158 may be between about 1:2 and about 4:1, for example, about 1.5:1. Further, the area of each of the stator vanes 156 may be greater than the area of each of the flowpaths 158. Moreover, the stator vanes 156 may be disposed at any pitch angle with respect to the circumference of the stator 120. For example, the stator vanes 156 may be oriented straight radial, against rotation (e.g., to increase shear), or with rotation. In the example illustrated in
With continuing reference to
Meanwhile, the additives 113 are poured into or otherwise received through the inlet 110, e.g., propelled by gravity, but may also be propelled by pressure differentials, vacuums, blowers, pumps, etc. The additives are then received onto the inlet face of the slinger 134, e.g., on the air side of the air-fluid boundary. The additives collide with the blades 138 and are slung radially outward into the fluid received from the impeller 136, while producing a circumferential velocity component to the fluid and dry additives. The circumferentially- and radially-driven dry additives and fluid then pass through the second annular portion 148 of the stator 120, where the combination is subjected to a high shear by interaction with the stator vanes 156 as it passes through the flowpaths 158. The shearing provided by the interaction with the blades 138 and stator vanes 156 and the turbulent flow developed by the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may provide a generally uniform dispersion of the additives in the fluid from the source 102, resulting in a slurry.
In particular, the first section 146 of the stator 120 is disposed at a small radial clearance from the slinger blades 138 (e.g., radially outward therefrom) such that the slurry mixture of additives 113 (e.g., powdered chemicals) and fluid being slung outward by the slinger blades 136 is sheared in a first stage in the clearance, by the relative movement of the blades 134 and the stator vanes 156. The slurry is then subjected to a second shear stage, as it is squeezed between the adjacent stator vanes 156 and pushed radially outwards through the flowpaths 158 by the action of the slinger 134. Moreover, the sudden expansion of the flow area radially outside of the stator 120 results in cavitation, further promoting mixing. As such, the mixer 104 provides, in operation, a two-stage, high shearing and regional cavitation mixing. The second section 148 of the stator 120 may have a substantially larger opening and be disposed above the slinger blades such that it allows the fluids to enter the slinger 134 through the slots 154, or otherwise minimizes flow obstruction through the stator 120.
The slurry may undergo such mixing multiple times, churning back through portions of the slinger 134 to effect further dispersion of the additives into the fluid, and eventually reaches the outlet 121, as shown in
The tapped, relatively clean fluid received via the opening 140 may flow through the flush line 122 to the additive-receiving structure 111. The pre-wetting fluid may then flow, e.g., by gravity, along the interior surface of the additive-receiving structure 111 through the inlet 110 and back to the slinger 134. As such, the additives may be urged along the additive-receiving structure 111, toward the slinger 134, while being pre-wetted therein. This may serve to minimize clumping along the surface of the additive-receiving structure 111.
Conversely, the “cleanliness,” that is, the inverse of the concentration of additives in the fluid, or, stated otherwise, the purity of the fluid, may decrease proceeding radially outward, as the fluid received through the inlet 108 is mixed with the additives. Accordingly, a tapping region 141 may be calculated, providing the optimal tradeoff between pressure head and cleanliness in the fluid tapped by the flush line 122 via the opening 140.
Moreover, the flowrate of the relatively clean fluid through the flush line 122 may be controlled, for example, by matching a location or size of the opening 140, the conduit 142, and/or the cone inlet 144 to the pressure head developed by the impeller 136. With a known pressure drop through the flush line 122, such control may result in an optimized amount of fluid flowing through the flush line 122. Further, the flush line 122 may include one or more flow control devices, which may further allow for adjustment of the flowrate through the flush line 122.
Moreover, as shown, the stator vanes 156 may be pitched at an angle relative to the circumference of the stator 120, for example, opposite to rotation, so as to maximize shearing. Similarly, the slinger blades 138 may be curved circumferentially, e.g., to facilitate slinging the fluid and additives radially outwardly, and with a circumferential velocity component, so as to produce the shearing.
The stator 120 illustrated in
In an embodiment, the disks 202 may be held apart by vanes 206, providing narrow flowpaths between the disks 202. The vanes 206 may provide slots, one for each of the annular disks 202, into which the annular disks 202 may be received and coupled to the vanes 206. Accordingly, the narrow paths may extend radially outwards, for example, obstructed in the radial direction only by the narrow vanes 206. In other embodiments, separate vanes may extend between each pair of adjacent disks 202, rather than or in addition to the vanes 206 that extend through the entire set of disks 202. Moreover, in some embodiments, the vanes 206 may couple with one or more subsets of the total number of disks 202. In some cases, the vanes 206 may be omitted, with the disks 202 held together in a spaced-apart relation in any other suitable manner.
The large surface area of the annular disks 202 bordering the flowpaths, and the narrowness of the flowpaths, may result in shearing and turbulent flow of the fluid therethrough. Such shearing may have a similar effect as the slinger 134 and stator 120 discussed above, and may promote dispersion of dry additives into fluid being slung radially outwards therethrough, while minimizing the impact forces from the vanes 204 which may damage more delicate material. In some cases, the shearing provided by the slinger 200 may result in the stator 120 being omitted; however, in other cases, the shearing effects of the stator 120 and the slinger 200 may be combined.
With the stator 300 being shroudless, the top of the flowpaths 310 may be open-ended, opening into the second annular portion 304 of the stator 120. The second annular portion 304 may include tabs 312 extending upwards from the first annular portion 302. The tabs 312 may be thicker, circumferentially, than the vanes 308, for example, each spanning two vanes 308 and one of the flowpaths 310; however, any relative sizing of the vanes 308 and tabs 312 may be employed. The shroudless configuration may minimize obstruction of the flow from the impeller 136, increasing efficiency of the mixer 104.
This embodiment of the mixer 104 may, in some cases, ensure all or substantially all of the incoming fluid is mixed with the additive chemical before exiting the mixer 104. For example, in cement mixing, the mixer 104 may blend the powder uniformly, so as to avoid relying on the pipe turbulence downstream of the mixer 104 to effect such mixing.
As with the stator 120, the stator 400 may be shrouded or shroudless, and may include two or more annular portions (e.g., one for low flow disruption and one for high flow disruption). The stator 400 may, however, be configured to receive substantially all fluid flow out of the volume of fluid, which may enhance bulk mixing. Such a mixer 104 embodiment employing the stator 400 may be suited for powder dispersion into a very viscous fluid medium as well as when powder volume fraction in the mixture is high, e.g., with cement mixing. Additionally, although not shown, embodiments of the mixer 104 shown in
The method 1000 may include feeding a fluid into the mixing chamber 118 of the mixer 104 through the fluid inlet 108, as at 1002. For example, the mixing chamber 118 may be defined within the housing 107, which may define the fluid inlet 108 that receives the fluid from the source 102. The method 1000 may also include feeding the additive into the mixing chamber 118 through the additive inlet 110, as at 1004. The feeding at 1004 may be propelled by gravity, for example, by pouring the additive into the additive-receiving structure 111 of the additive inlet 110, although other methods for feeding the additive are also contemplated.
The method 1000 may also include rotating the impeller/slinger assembly 112 disposed in the mixing chamber 118, as at 1006. Rotating the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may draw fluid from the fluid inlet 108 (e.g., upwards) and radially outward, for example, by action of the impeller 136 disposed with its inlet face 136-1 proximal to the interior surface 139. Rotating the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may further cause the fluid, e.g., received from the impeller 136, along with the additive received through the additive inlet 110, to be slung radially outward. In an example, the outward slinging may be caused by the slinger 134 of the impeller/slinger assembly 112, which may include blades 138 and/or disks 202. Further, the slinger 134 may include an inlet face 134-1, which may, for example, be oriented toward the additive inlet 110. When the additive is fed through the additive inlet 110, the additive may impinge on the blades 138 and/or disks 202 and be slug radially outward
The combination of the impeller 136 and the slinger 134, e.g., in a back-to-back configuration, may result in an eye defined by a hydrodynamically-stable fluid-air boundary, to develop in the slinger 134. For example, the boundary may be present radially between a hub 138-1 and tip 138-2 of the blades 138 of the slinger 134. The slinging of the additive (as well as the fluid received from the impeller 136) radially outwards by action of the slinger 134 may result in the additive crossing the air-fluid boundary, and thus being at least partially dispersed into the fluid, thereby forming a slurry. In some cases, the action of the impeller/slinger assembly 112 may create a hydrodynamically-stable eye, forming a fluid-air boundary, thereby preventing air from becoming entrained in the fluid. However, in some cases, air may be purposely introduced into the mixture, for example, in foaming applications, e.g., using the stator 120 of
The additive may further be dispersed in the fluid, promoting increased homogenization of the slurry, by the slurry being received through the stator 120, as at 1008. Various embodiments of the stator 120 are discussed above, e.g., with the first and second annular portions 146, 148 provided to minimize and maximize fluid shearing, respectively. In general, the stator 120 may include the plurality of vanes 156, defining flowpaths therebetween, through which the slurry is received. The interaction of the swirled, turbulent flow of the slurry with the stator vanes 156 may result in increased shearing of the fluid, which may increase mixing efficiency of the mixer 104. Once mixed to a desired degree, the slurry with a certain concentration of additives may be expelled from the mixer 104, as at 1010, via the outlet 121, which may be disposed radially outwards of the impeller/slinger assembly 112.
The method 1000 may also include, e.g., as caused by rotation of the impeller/slinger assembly 112 at 1006, a portion of the fluid or slurry (e.g., with a relatively low concentration, relative to flow through the outlet 121) to flow into the flush line 122 and to the additive inlet 110, to pre-wet the additive, as at 1012. For example, the flush line 122 may include the opening 140, which may be positioned and/or sized so as to receive a slurry with a predetermined (e.g., minimized) concentration of additives at a predetermined (e.g., maximized) pressure in the mixing chamber 118. The sizing of the flush line 122, placement of the opening 140 thereof, and/or employment of flow control devices in the flush line 122, etc. may allow control of the amount of fluid that proceeds through the flush line 122 and the composition thereof.
It will be appreciated that terms implying a direction or an orientation, e.g., “up,” “down,” “upwards,” “downwards,” “above”, “below,” “laterally,” and the like are employed merely for convenience to indicate relative positioning of the components with respect to each other, as depicted in the various figures. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that these terms are not intended to limit the mixer 104 to any particular orientation, however.
Further, while the present teachings have been illustrated with respect to one or more embodiments, alterations and/or modifications may be made to the illustrated examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. In addition, while a particular feature of the present teachings may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular function. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including,” “includes,” “having,” “has,” “with,” or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.” Further, in the discussion and claims herein, the term “about” indicates that the value listed may be somewhat altered, as long as the alteration does not result in nonconformance of the process or structure to the illustrated embodiment. Finally, “exemplary” indicates the description is used as an example, rather than implying that it is an ideal.
Other embodiments of the present teachings will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the present teachings disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the present teachings being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
559965 | Bierstadt | May 1896 | A |
896233 | McQueen | Aug 1908 | A |
1526527 | Butler | Feb 1925 | A |
1560826 | Kirschbraun | Nov 1925 | A |
1576940 | Arthur | Mar 1926 | A |
2073652 | Robb | Mar 1937 | A |
2099898 | Larkin | Nov 1937 | A |
2357583 | Franco | Sep 1944 | A |
2735839 | Schrenk | Feb 1956 | A |
2774497 | Martin | Dec 1956 | A |
2792262 | Hathorn | May 1957 | A |
2858950 | Martin | Nov 1958 | A |
3155248 | Haller | Nov 1964 | A |
3170560 | Obmascher | Feb 1965 | A |
3208616 | Haskins | Sep 1965 | A |
3263436 | Goldfarb | Aug 1966 | A |
3314557 | Sackett | Apr 1967 | A |
3378152 | Warner et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3394961 | Matte | Jul 1968 | A |
3451986 | Metais | Jun 1969 | A |
3490632 | McKinney | Jan 1970 | A |
3497327 | Kehse | Feb 1970 | A |
3560053 | Ortloff | Feb 1971 | A |
3618801 | Blanchard | Nov 1971 | A |
3666129 | Haskins | May 1972 | A |
3687319 | Adam et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3743108 | Visser | Jul 1973 | A |
3756443 | Verschage et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3787479 | Oriehl et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3842910 | Zingg et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3883019 | Hansen, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3883148 | Miller | May 1975 | A |
3894645 | Verschage | Jul 1975 | A |
3938673 | Perry, Jr. | Feb 1976 | A |
3974602 | Pohl et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3985254 | Grandury | Oct 1976 | A |
3998433 | Iwako | Dec 1976 | A |
4026441 | Jones | May 1977 | A |
4077612 | Ricciardi | Mar 1978 | A |
4079150 | Beck et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4090623 | Noyon | May 1978 | A |
4099005 | Fullington | Jul 1978 | A |
4103793 | Weaver | Aug 1978 | A |
4111314 | Nelson | Sep 1978 | A |
4178117 | Brugler | Dec 1979 | A |
4187047 | Squifflet, Sr. | Feb 1980 | A |
4209278 | Cooper et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4222498 | Brock | Sep 1980 | A |
4248359 | Brock | Feb 1981 | A |
4249848 | Griffin et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4268208 | Hankins et al. | May 1981 | A |
4337014 | Farnham | Jun 1982 | A |
4348146 | Brock | Sep 1982 | A |
4373857 | Giles | Feb 1983 | A |
4375343 | Butler | Mar 1983 | A |
4400126 | Desourdy | Aug 1983 | A |
4427133 | Kierbow et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4453829 | Althouse | Jun 1984 | A |
4465420 | Dillman | Aug 1984 | A |
4494903 | Badicel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4561821 | Dillman | Dec 1985 | A |
4579496 | Gerlach | Apr 1986 | A |
4601628 | Lowing | Jul 1986 | A |
4621972 | Grotte | Nov 1986 | A |
4624357 | Oury et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4626166 | Jolly | Dec 1986 | A |
4671665 | McIntire | Jun 1987 | A |
4701095 | Berryman et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4775275 | Perry | Oct 1988 | A |
4808004 | McIntire et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4832561 | Nijenhuis | May 1989 | A |
4834542 | Sherwood | May 1989 | A |
4850750 | Cogbill et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4855960 | Janssen et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4883363 | Pillon et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4899832 | Bierscheid, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907712 | Stempin | Mar 1990 | A |
4917560 | Murray et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4925358 | Cook | May 1990 | A |
4944646 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5006034 | Bragg et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5018932 | Croisier | May 1991 | A |
5035269 | Pytryga et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046856 | McIntire | Sep 1991 | A |
5052486 | Wilson | Oct 1991 | A |
5121989 | Horton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5190374 | Harms et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195861 | Handke | Mar 1993 | A |
5201498 | Akins | Apr 1993 | A |
5236261 | Hagenbuch | Aug 1993 | A |
5339996 | Dubbert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5362193 | Milstead | Nov 1994 | A |
5382411 | Allen | Jan 1995 | A |
5387736 | Salomone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413154 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426137 | Allen | Jun 1995 | A |
5427497 | Dillman | Jun 1995 | A |
5571281 | Allen | Nov 1996 | A |
5667298 | Musil et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685416 | Bonnet | Nov 1997 | A |
5775713 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777234 | Kosmal | Jul 1998 | A |
5785421 | Milek | Jul 1998 | A |
5795062 | Johnson | Aug 1998 | A |
5822930 | Klein | Oct 1998 | A |
5964566 | Stewart et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6000840 | Paterson | Dec 1999 | A |
6050743 | Medinger | Apr 2000 | A |
6186195 | Anstotz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186654 | Gunteret, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193402 | Grimland et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6286986 | Grimland et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6293689 | Guntert, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6447674 | Simon et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6474926 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491421 | Rondeau et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6527428 | Guntert, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6832851 | von Wilcken | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6939031 | Pham et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948535 | Stegemoeller | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7048432 | Phillippi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7104328 | Phillippi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7214028 | Boasso et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258522 | Pham et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7308953 | Barnes | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7419296 | Allen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424943 | Gausman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7540308 | Pessin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7614451 | Blaschke et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7703518 | Phillippi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7815222 | Markham | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836949 | Dykstra | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837427 | Beckel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841394 | McNeel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845413 | Shampine et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866881 | El Kholy et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7921914 | Bruins et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926564 | Phillippi et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931088 | Stegemoeller et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8066955 | Pinchot | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083083 | Mohns | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8127844 | Luharuka et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137051 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142134 | Lavoie et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146665 | Neal | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8313269 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8354602 | Lucas et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8585341 | Oren et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8651792 | Friesen | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661743 | Flusche | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8726584 | Nolte et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8734081 | Stegemoeller et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8834012 | Case et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8926252 | McIver et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8931996 | Friesen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944740 | Teichrob et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9017001 | Dueck | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9097033 | Margevicius et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9457335 | Pham et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9475029 | McSpadden et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9663303 | Waldner et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9688178 | Pham | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20020034120 | Guntert, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020147370 | Hinz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030150494 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161212 | Neal et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030196809 | Willberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202869 | Posch | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227817 | Martel et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008571 | Coody et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040209780 | Harris et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040256106 | Phillippi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028979 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067351 | Graham | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091941 | Baird | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123385 | Kirsch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050201197 | Duell | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060028914 | Phillippi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060065400 | Smith | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060107998 | Kholy et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060289166 | Stromquist et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014653 | Glenn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070114035 | Parris et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179326 | Baker | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201305 | Heilman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080008562 | Beckel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080066911 | Luharuka et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073895 | Herman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080179054 | McGough et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080264641 | Slabaugh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090078410 | Krenek et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078792 | Vlasak | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090504 | Weightman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100038077 | Heilman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071284 | Hagan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100188926 | Stegemoeller | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100243251 | Luharuka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243252 | Luharuka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243255 | Luharuka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278621 | Redekop | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100319921 | Eia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329072 | Hagan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110003720 | Sullivan | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026358 | Cheio De Oliveira | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110061855 | Case et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063942 | Hagan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110127178 | Claussen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110197536 | Clark | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120024738 | Herman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048537 | Rettie et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120127820 | Noles, Jr. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127822 | Noles, Jr. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128449 | Fikes et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134772 | Herman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167485 | Trevithick et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120219291 | Chiku et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219391 | Teichrob et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120255734 | Coli et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273206 | Zamora et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298210 | Pham et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130105166 | Medvedev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150268 | Oldham | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130269735 | Roetzel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288934 | Powell et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130309052 | Luharuka et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130324444 | Lesko et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140041317 | Pham et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041319 | Pham et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041322 | Pham et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140044508 | Luharuka et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140166647 | Sheesley et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140255265 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140364346 | Weinstein et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150044003 | Pham | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150044004 | Pham et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064077 | McSpadden et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150166260 | Pham et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150238912 | Luharuka et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238914 | Luharuka et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150240148 | Luharuka et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160129418 | Pham et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160130924 | Pham et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170327309 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2643743 | Apr 2011 | CA |
2601189 | Jan 2004 | CN |
2693601 | Apr 2005 | CN |
101434836 | May 2009 | CN |
201317413 | Sep 2009 | CN |
201458370 | May 2010 | CN |
201610285 | Oct 2010 | CN |
202398329 | Aug 2012 | CN |
202506322 | Oct 2012 | CN |
203486442 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103721619 | Apr 2014 | CN |
204109871 | Jan 2015 | CN |
0048312 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0241056 | Oct 1987 | EP |
2609999 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2655007 | May 1991 | FR |
S5715828 | Jan 1982 | JP |
100589613 | Jun 2006 | KR |
10418 | Jul 1999 | RU |
2228842 | Jan 2004 | RU |
1341161 | Sep 1987 | SU |
8500046 | Jan 1985 | WO |
1985000046 | Jan 1985 | WO |
WO 0244517 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03087182 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2007022300 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007098606 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2010070599 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2011061503 | May 2011 | WO |
2011088493 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012121896 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012166590 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013099826 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013134624 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014028317 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2015/017175 dated May 28, 2015; 16 pages. |
Extended Search Report issued in European Patent Appl. No. 15755550.9 dated Oct. 9, 2017; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in Eurasian Patent Appl. No. 201691737/31 dated Mar. 19, 2018; 4 pages (with English translation). |
Natural gas flow measurement, written and compiled by Long Yangming, Petroleum Industry Press, pp. 84-85, Mar. 1962. |
Fracturing technology for ultra-low permeability reservoirs, written by Ran Xinquan, Petroleum Industry Press, pp. 223-224, Feb. 2012. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201580032114.7 dated Jul. 18, 2018; 15 pages. |
Practical Technical Manual for Dairy Product Engineer, edit by Gu Ming, pp. 605-607, China Light Industry Press, Jan. 2009. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2015800109793 dated Sep. 12, 2018; 32 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201580036796.9 dated Oct. 25, 2018; 29 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Russian Patent Appl. No. 2015117758 dated Dec. 5, 2018; 13 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Russian Patent Appl. No. 2015117770 dated Nov. 16, 2018; 16 pages (with English Translation). |
Office Action issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2017102359 dated Mar. 7, 2018; 11 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2014132435 dated Apr. 3, 2018; 9 pages (with English translation). |
Decision on Grant issued in Russian Patent Appl. No. 2017102359 dated Jul. 27, 2018; 16 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201580034894.9 dated Jul. 3, 2018; 9 pages (with English translation). |
Decision on Grant issued in Russian Patent Appl. No. 2014132435 dated Sep. 20, 2018; 24 pages (with English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2015/059182 dated Feb. 29, 2016; 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2015/059177 dated Feb. 17, 2016; 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2015/030287 dated Jul. 29, 2015; 14 pages. |
Examination Report dated Dec. 19, 2018 in corresponding AU Application No. 2015259393; 4 pages. |
1st Examination Report dated Mar. 26, 2019 in corresponding SA Application No. 516380637 with agent's reporting letter; 7 pages. |
Decision on Grant issued in Russian Patent Appl. No. 2015117770/05 dated Feb. 20, 2019; 20 pages (with English translation). |
“Practical Technical Manuel for Dairy Product Engineer”, Gu Ming editor, China Light Industry Press, Jan. 2009, pp. 605-607. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2948002 dated May 31, 2021, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/859,188 dated Sep. 27, 2021, 54 pages. |
Exam Report issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2019283869 dated Oct. 15, 2021, 2 pages. |
Examiner's Report issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2858452 dated Oct. 25, 2021, 4 pages. |
Office Action 97624 issued in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2016/014601 dated Oct. 22, 2021, 7 pages. |
Substantive Examination issued in Bahrain Patent Application No. 20160114 dated Jan. 10, 2022, 10 pages with English translation. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/859,188 dated Jan. 18, 2022, 12 pages. |
Examination Report dated Feb. 28, 2022 in corresponding Saudi Arabia Application No. 516380275; 7 pages (with English translation). |
Re-examination report issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580036796.9 dated Mar. 30, 2022; 18 pages. |
2nd Substantive Examination issued in Mexican Patent Application No. Mx/a/2016/014690 dated Nov. 23, 2022, 14 pages with English translation. |
Substantive Examination issued in Bahrain Patent Application No. 20160114 dated Apr. 25, 2022, 9 pages with English translation. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/859,188 dated May 3, 2022, 16 pages. |
First Substantive Examination issued in Mexican Patent Application MX/a/2016/014690 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 16 pages with English translation. |
Re-examination report issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580036796.9 dated Jul. 7, 2022; 40 pages with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150238913 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |