This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2011/060515, filed Jun. 22, 2011, which claims priority to German Patent Applications Nos. 10 2010 034 255.6, filed Aug. 13, 2010 and 10 2010 036 100.3, filed Sep. 1, 2010. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a mixing device for premixing combustion air and gas, comprising a device having a gas outlet for gas introduction and comprising a nozzle, a gas inlet being provided on the nozzle or on a bridging element arranged on the nozzle, and the gas path from the gas outlet to the gas inlet being sealed off by a gasket extending from the gas outlet to the gas inlet. The invention further relates to a firing device, comprising a gas burner having a combustion chamber, comprising a fan, and comprising a mixing device, the mixture of combustion air and gas supplied by the mixing device being introduced to the combustion chamber of the gas burner by means of the fan.
Mixing devices for mixing gas and combustion air are known from the prior art. For example, DE 10 2005 007 123 B3 discloses a mixing unit formed from a gas regulating device and a Venturi nozzle, in which a gas outlet connector of the gas regulating device is inserted into a corresponding recess of the housing of the Venturi nozzle so as to ensure a gas-tight connection between the two components. The gas regulating device and the Venturi nozzle are rigidly interconnected. The possible tolerances of the individual components are thus very low. However, it would be desirable to be able to provide a more flexible connection option so as to ensure a greater freedom of configuration in the arrangement of the various components.
Accordingly, the object of the present invention is to provide a mixing device which is simple to assemble and in which the gas regulating device and the nozzle are interconnected in a gas-tight manner, but with the possibility of tolerance compensation, and thus not necessarily directly and rigidly.
The present object is achieved by a mixing device having the features of claim 1. According to the invention, a gas inlet is provided on the nozzle or on a bridging element arranged on the nozzle, and the gas path from the gas outlet to the gas inlet is sealed off by a gasket extending from the gas outlet to the gas inlet. In a development, a gas inlet connector may be provided on the nozzle or on a bridging element to the nozzle, a gasket being provided which forms a tight seal on the outside or inside of the gas inlet connector over a predetermined axial length and seals off the gas path from the gas outlet to the nozzle or the bridging element. In this context, a gas regulating device may be used as a device for gas introduction. Alternatively, the gas regulator may also be arranged on the nozzle or upstream from the gas valve, and the device for gas introduction may be a (safety) gas valve.
A gas inlet is understood to mean any construction to which a gasket can be applied, it also being possible to form a gas inlet connector of a corresponding construction as a wall on the inside of the nozzle or the bridging element. The feature “gas regulating device” is defined as any device which is suitable for making the gas provided by the gas line available in the desired amounts. A “nozzle” should be understood to mean any component which mixes flows of combustion air and gas inside a housing; this means that mixing devices in general are included, even those without a “nozzle function”. A “gas path” is understood to mean the flow path of the gas. The “gas outlet” is defined by a region in which the gas leaves the gas regulating device or the gas valve. Although only embodiments comprising gas regulating devices are disclosed in the following, it will be appreciated that the gas valve may also be used for this purpose in all of the embodiments. In this case, the amount of gas is regulated for example at the nozzle.
So as to increase the flexibility of the arrangement of the various components and to ensure a high level of tolerance compensation, in a preferred development the gas inlet connector may be arranged on the nozzle indirectly via a bridging element. It is thus unnecessary to form the gas inlet connector directly on the nozzle, and instead, the bridging element may take on any desired form and bridge any distance between the gas regulating device and the nozzle. In a preferred embodiment, the gas inlet connector projects outwards past an edge plane of the nozzle or the bridging element, in such a way that the gasket can be applied to the outside or inside of the connector. In the present document, “projecting outwards” should be understood to mean any construction of the connectors in which a portion of the respective connector projects past an edge plane of the component on which the connector is arranged. If a bridging element is used, a gas path is provided from the gas regulating valve to the nozzle, it being possible to arrange the gas inlet connector on the bridging element in such a way that said connector extends substantially flush with the gas outlet connector of the gas regulating valve and projects axially from an edge plane of the bridging element. As a result of using a bridging element, the gas regulating device and the nozzle can be arranged at different vertical levels and thus mutually independently, making the freedom of configuration in the arrangement of the various components more flexible and increasing the tolerance compensation.
The invention comprises the possible alternatives of selectively either providing an additional gas outlet connector on the gas regulating device, which connector is enclosed at least in portions by the gasket, or forming the gas outlet on the gas regulating device as an outlet opening and attaching the gasket in a sealing manner to the inside of the gas outlet. In an embodiment in which the gasket is attached to the inside of the gas outlet, the gas outlet connector is omitted, and production costs and assembly time are reduced. The gasket may be arranged selectively on either the outside or the inside of the gas inlet or gas inlet connector.
In an embodiment comprising two connectors, the gas outlet connector and the gas inlet connector may each be configured to be substantially tubular and with substantially identical diameters, in such a way that the gasket can lie flat on the respective connector and enclose it. In a favourable embodiment of this type, the gasket of fixed diameter exerts substantially identical forces on the outer surfaces of the connectors. However, “substantially tubular” also includes oval constructions. Further, one connector may be oval and formed with a larger internal cross-section than the opposite tubular connector.
Preferably, the gas outlet and gas inlet connectors are arranged in such a way that the respective mutually facing axial outer edges thereof are at a distance, the distance preferably being between 0.5 and 3 mm, more preferably between 1 and 2 mm, most preferably 1 mm. In the present document, “axial” is generally defined as the direction in which the gas outlet connector and the gas inlet connector face one another; for a tubular construction of the connectors, “axial” would thus be the axial longitudinal direction of the tube. Alternatively, even large distances of several centimeters may be provided, for example if the bridging element is formed by the gasket itself. The spacing of the outer edges makes possible a flexible arrangement of the components, which is formed substantially flush as regards the connectors but need not necessarily be fixed exactly. Some offset between the connectors can be compensated as a result of the resilience of the gasket. However, the spacing of the connectors is selected to be as small as possible, in such a way that the gas flow from the gas outlet or gas outlet connector into the inlet connector remains substantially unaffected. In one favourable arrangement, the connectors may be arranged abutting one another, so as to achieve the best possible result in terms of flow whilst providing radial freedom of movement.
In an alternative embodiment, an offset which can be compensated by the gasket may be provided deliberately between the gas outlet or gas outlet connector and the gas inlet connector. For this purpose, the gasket may be in the form of a preformed gasket, which compensates the corresponding offset of several centimeters. Smaller tolerances are additionally possible as a result of the resilience of the gasket material, preferably silicone, NBR or EPDM. Aside from the resilience, these substances have the necessary advantage of being gas-proof.
To attach the gasket to the connectors or to the gas inlet connector and the gas outlet, a simple adhesive connection may be provided between the outer surfaces of the connectors and the inside of the gasket or between the inner surface of the gas outlet and the gas inlet connector and the outer surfaces of the gasket. In a preferred embodiment, the outwardly projecting portions of the connectors comprise external lamellae or an external thread, in which corresponding recesses of the gasket on the inside thereof or an internal thread can engage. If the gasket is arranged on the inside, the lamellae or thread may correspondingly be provided on the inside of the gas outlet or the gas inlet connector. This type of attachment is advantageous because it prevents the gasket from slipping, whilst at the same time ensuring high gas-tightness with a releasably attached gasket. Attachment using lamellae on the connectors and corresponding recesses on the gaskets means that the gas-tightness is even ensured at a plurality of contact points between the connectors and the gasket. The respective projecting portion of the connectors may be between 4 and 50 mm long, in a preferred embodiment between 25 and 30 mm long, so as to ensure a sufficient contact area to ensure the gas-tightness between the gasket and the connectors.
In a development, the axial length of the gasket may be greater than the length to be bridged between the gas regulating device and the nozzle or bridging element, in such a way that the axially central region of the gasket forms a bulge. This additional material of the gasket in the axial direction ensures the possibility of compensating any movements of the gas regulating device relative to the nozzle or the bridging element, in such a way that a seal is ensured even if the connectors are not arranged precisely flush. The axial length of the gasket may further be configured in such a way that at least one, but preferably both of the axial end portions of the gasket lie against the respectively adjacent component (gas regulating device, nozzle, bridging element). In this way, additional sealing surfaces are provided in the radial direction, and moreover the gasket is always deformed in the axial direction, preventing it from being released unintentionally.
In one embodiment of the invention, the gas outlet connector may be releasably attached to the gas regulating device, and the gas inlet connector may be releasably attached to the nozzle or the bridging element, or alternatively the connectors may also be an integral component of these units. The releasable arrangement may for example be provided by way of a screw connection. Said screw connection is advantageous in terms of ease of assembly, since the individual components can be prepared and assembled mutually independently. An integral construction, for example in that the respective connector is extruded directly onto the component by injection moulding, makes the assembly faster, since no additional steps are required for attaching the connector to the respective unit.
In a development of the invention, a shutter which limits the amount of gas flow may additionally be arranged in the gas path from the gas regulating device to the nozzle or the bridging element. As well as natural gases, liquefied gases may also be provided by gas regulating devices. For example, in new buildings the heating system is often installed very early in the construction process, in such a way that liquefied gas can be burnt initially and natural gas only subsequently. However, liquefied gas is sufficiently calorific that the amount supplied via the gas regulating device has to be limited. One solution would be to set up the gas regulating device in a correspondingly complex manner, but the installer would require specialist knowledge for this purpose. Therefore, according to the invention, a shutter which is of a reduced cross section and thus limits the flow of gas in a predefined manner is provided in the gas path. In the case of conversion to natural gas, the shutter can easily be removed again. In the case of screw or plug-in connections between the gas regulating device and the nozzle, such as are used in the state of the art, it is not possible to introduce an additional component, which does not have to be matched in detail to the dimensions of the components used, in such a simple manner. It is also particularly favourable that the shutter can be enclosed externally by the gasket, in such a way that the gas path can be sealed in this region using a single gasket and the sealing surfaces thereof at the gas outlet and the gas inlet connector. For this purpose, the shutter may be laid in, linked in or injected in advance into the gasket. In a form which is easy to operate, the shutter is in the shape of a disc comprising an internal hole, which can be arranged in any desired direction inside the gasket. The shutter may be included in the gas regulating device at the initial installation, so as to be able to provide conversion to liquefied gas in a simple, cost-effective manner with rapid assembly. The installer does not require any specialist knowledge.
In an alternative embodiment, the gasket may be formed with a projection, which can press against a flange portion of the shutter and thus fix it in place in the gas inlet connector when said gasket is installed. The gas inlet into the nozzle is thus clearly defined. The shutter is arranged rigidly in the components, and can be inserted into the gas inlet connector or the gasket in advance for simpler installation. Manipulation is thus made even simpler for the installer.
In one favourable embodiment, the gas regulating device and the nozzle are held on a retaining device in such a way that the gasket remains unaffected by external forces during operation of the firing device. According to the invention, the gas regulating device and the nozzle are attached to the holding device, for example a frame construction, and orientated in such a way that the connectors are substantially flush. Once the gasket has been arranged, manual orientation of the connectors is sufficient before the respective units are fixed rigidly to the holding means.
Claim 16 further defines the firing device which comprises a mixing device according to the invention.
The measures specified above can be tested retrospectively, for example by measuring using calipers.
Other advantageous developments of the invention are characterised in the subordinate claims, or disclosed in greater detail in the following in connection with the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention by way of the drawings. In the drawings, which are exemplary and schematic and not necessarily to scale:
In all of the embodiments, the gas regulating device 1 and the nozzle 3 are arranged on a holding device (not shown) in such a way that the gasket 6 is unaffected by external forces and tensions after assembly.
The invention further includes a firing device, comprising a gas burner having a combustion chamber, comprising a fan, and comprising a mixing device which comprises the disclosed gas regulating device and the disclosed nozzle and the corresponding connection of the components.
The configuration of the invention is not limited to the preferred embodiments specified above. Rather, a number of variants which make use of the disclosed solution is conceivable, even if the configurations are fundamentally different in nature. For example, the gasket may be glued to a connector as well as being locked by way of lamellae. As a general rule, the features which are disclosed for one embodiment can also be used in other embodiments whenever this is technically possible. For example, a lamella connection according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 034 255 | Aug 2010 | DE | national |
10 2010 036 100 | Sep 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/060515 | 6/22/2011 | WO | 00 | 2/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/019818 | 2/16/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
282967 | Duffy | Aug 1883 | A |
1354419 | Reppetto | Sep 1920 | A |
1762721 | Klingner | Jun 1930 | A |
1912612 | Wills | Jun 1933 | A |
1978529 | Harrah | Oct 1934 | A |
2261361 | Gerhardt et al. | Nov 1941 | A |
2288684 | Couty | Jul 1942 | A |
2319586 | Clench | May 1943 | A |
2548904 | Neal et al. | Apr 1951 | A |
2582249 | Hendel | Jan 1952 | A |
2695183 | Andrew et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2896606 | Ross et al. | Jul 1959 | A |
3008738 | Longfellow | Nov 1961 | A |
3017203 | MacLeod | Jan 1962 | A |
RE25653 | Longfellow | Oct 1964 | E |
3169785 | Ziebold | Feb 1965 | A |
3251393 | Beach et al. | May 1966 | A |
3530900 | Kish | Sep 1970 | A |
3574354 | Mischel | Apr 1971 | A |
3606608 | Miller et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3692337 | Mischel | Sep 1972 | A |
3714966 | Zobler et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3743328 | Longfellow | Jul 1973 | A |
3909186 | Kidwell et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3970334 | Campbell | Jul 1976 | A |
4082327 | Sting et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4111464 | Asano et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4142554 | Washkewicz et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4733890 | Vyse | Mar 1988 | A |
4817997 | Ingram | Apr 1989 | A |
4909547 | Guy | Mar 1990 | A |
5015014 | Sweeney | May 1991 | A |
5165727 | Valley | Nov 1992 | A |
5316350 | Kollenbrandt et al. | May 1994 | A |
5346138 | Ridenour | Sep 1994 | A |
5360242 | Argent | Nov 1994 | A |
5370427 | Hoelle et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397157 | Hempel et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5462431 | Ahmady | Oct 1995 | A |
5538294 | Thomas | Jul 1996 | A |
5766003 | Vogelzang | Jun 1998 | A |
5904378 | Bakker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921591 | Argent | Jul 1999 | A |
5934269 | Wilson | Aug 1999 | A |
5941232 | Vogelzang | Aug 1999 | A |
6095133 | Walters | Aug 2000 | A |
6116289 | Hayashi | Sep 2000 | A |
6244223 | Welk | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6308992 | Mitsui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6860518 | Krauss et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7237547 | Bourgeois | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7513247 | Clauss et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D612915 | McPheat | Mar 2010 | S |
7896748 | Muskus et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8136845 | Patel | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8523242 | Hosotani et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020001786 | Haynes et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030099799 | Koike et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040209212 | Schmidt | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222626 | Baruh | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239109 | Angus | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060016444 | Clauss et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070216157 | Tarquini | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080106097 | Homrich | May 2008 | A1 |
20090072494 | Smith | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100037629 | Voorhis | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19748570 | May 1999 | DE |
WO-2004063629 | Jul 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/060515. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/EP2011/060515, ISA/EP, Rijswijk, NL, mailed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130149654 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |