Patent Grant
11052360
The present application relates generally to commercial mixers utilized for mixing food products such as dough, and more particularly to a commercial mixer and associated control and diagnostic system.
It is known in existing commercial mixers to provide multiple speed settings for the mixers. The various available mixing speeds are primarily driven by a motor through combinations of gears and/or belts and/or variable adjustable pulleys, where mechanical adjustments are made to change mix speeds. Many such devices require that the mixer be stopped in order to change speeds.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,207,711 is representative of a mixer that does not utilize mechanical adjustment of any drive linkage or gear system to change speeds, but instead simply adjusted the output speed of, for example, an AC induction motor. Even with the advantages provided by such a mixing machine drive and control arrangement, due to the relatively harsh operating conditions for such machines, service/repair issues regularly arise. In today's environment, such service/repair issues are handled on a reactive basis, which in some cases can result in undesirable down time for the mixing machine.
Existing mixers, generally include a transmission and motor. For example, an exemplary machine may include a motor, a transmission, and a variable frequency drive (VFD) to control the motor. Diagnostics for such a mixer include the following: looking through a sight-glass located on the rotating planetary while the mixer is not running to see the oil level in the planetary, use of a dip-stick to check the transmission case oil level (requiring removal of a mixer head cover to access the dip stick), and viewing any live error codes from the VFD on the display of the machine. In this regard,
Other issues with such existing machine from a general diagnostic perspective include: there is currently no way to predict when components are nearing or have passed their nominal life-cycle, there is currently no way to tell if there is excessive vibration which may indicate a worn-out ball bearing, there is currently no way to notify service automatically if there is a problem, and there is currently no way to automatically shut off the mixer if a critical problem is imminent. Minor issues which could be resolved with minimal time, effort, and expense can go undetected, resulting in more serious issues that can lead to down time and expensive repairs. Many component failures could be prevented if the problem was detected, identified and appropriate steps taken sooner.
With existing machines, service technicians typically make two trips: one to diagnose issues, and another to fix the problem. Service of food machines, such as mixers, is almost completely reactive as opposed to predictive which increases warranty cost and machine down time.
It would be desirable to provide a mixing machine that enables proactive service/repair and/or more effective service/repair to reduce any mixing machine down time.
In one aspect, a mixing machine includes a control system with a drive for operating the motor, a plurality of sensors for detecting respective conditions of mixing machine, and a diagnostic control operable to track outputs from the sensors over time, analyze the outputs and produce an alert upon detection of a characteristic indicative of a need for service or repair.
In another aspect, a mixing machine includes a head extending over a bowl receiving location, the head including a downwardly extending rotatable output shaft for receiving a mixer tool, the head including a gear system therewithin for effecting rotation of the rotatable output shaft about its axis and orbiting of the shaft axis about another axis. A motor includes an output operatively connected to drive the gear system. A control system includes a drive for operating the motor, a plurality of sensors, each sensor located for detecting a respective condition of mixing machine, and a diagnostic control operable to (i) track outputs from the plurality of sensors over time, (ii) analyze such tracked outputs and (iii) produce an alert indication based upon the diagnostic control identifying a performance characteristic indicative of a need for service or repair of the mixing machine.
In a further aspect, a mixing machine includes a head extending over a bowl receiving location, the head including a downwardly extending rotatable output shaft for receiving a mixer tool, the head including a planetary system therewithin for effecting rotation of the rotatable output shaft about its axis and orbiting of the shaft axis about another axis. A motor includes an output operatively connected to drive the planetary system. A control system includes a plurality of sensors, each sensor located for detecting a respective condition of mixing machine, and a diagnostic control operable to (i) track outputs from the plurality of sensors over time, (ii) analyze the tracked outputs and (iii) produce an alert indication based upon the diagnostic control identifying a performance characteristic indicative of a need for service or repair of the mixing machine.
In another aspect, a mixing machine includes a head extending over a bowl receiving location, the head including a downwardly extending rotatable output shaft for receiving a mixer tool. A drive train including a motor having an output operatively connected to drive a planetary gear system that effects rotation of the rotatable output shaft about its axis and orbiting of the shaft axis about another axis. A control system includes a master control unit and a slave control unit, the master control unit connected with a first sensor located along the drive train between the motor and the planetary gear system, the slave control unit connected with a second sensor, wherein both the slave control unit and the second sensor rotate with a part of the planetary gear system, wherein the master control unit and the slave control unit are configured for wireless communication with each other.
In a further aspect, a food processing machine includes a drive train including a motor having an output operatively connected to drive a gear system. A control system of the machine includes a primary control unit and a secondary control unit. The primary control unit is connected with a first sensor located along the drive train. The secondary control unit is connected with a second sensor, wherein both the secondary control unit and the second sensor rotate with a part of the drive train, wherein the secondary control unit is lacks any wired connection to the primary control unit and is configured for wireless communication with the primary control unit.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Referring to
An exemplary mix position of a bowl 50 is shown schematically in
The mixing machine also includes a user interface 60 with manual user controls (e.g., physically movable buttons, knobs and/or switches) and/or electronic user input controls (e.g., a touch-screen interface), with an associated processor-based controller (e.g., control board(s)) 100. The user interface 60 may have one or more display fields or screens 62 (
The mixing machine control system may include a drive 70 for operating the motor 26 (e.g., a simple drive in the case of a single speed motor or a more dynamic drive, such as a variable frequency drive (VFD), in the case of a variable speed motor).
The mixing machine includes a plurality of sensors for detecting various operating conditions of mixing machine. For example, a set of temperatures sensors 72 (e.g., a controller/VFD heat sink temperature sensor 72A, a motor stator temperature sensor 72B and/or a transmission case temperature sensor 72C), power consumption sensors 74 (e.g., a voltage sensor 74A, a current sensor 74B and/or additional current sensor 74C) and/or mechanical sensors 76 (e.g., a motor shaft position encoder 76A, an output shaft position encoder 76B and/or a transmission case accelerometer 76C) can be provided at various locations in the mixing machine to detect respective conditions of the mixing machine as shown.
A diagnostic control 102 is provided as part of the controller 100 configuration and is operable to track outputs from the various sensors over time. In one implementation, the diagnostic control 102 identifies maximum or minimum condition indicated by each sensor during each mixing operation carried out and stores such maximum or minimum condition in memory for analysis. The diagnostic control 102 is also operable to analyze the stored outputs and produce an alert or alerts upon detection of a characteristic indicative of a need for service or repair of the mixing machine. Exemplary diagnostic alert messages may include motor overheating, transmission overheating, open circuit, short circuit, machine overloading, locked rotor, transmission damage or failure and/or bearing and shaft damage or failure. The alerts may be delivered to one or more of (i) the on-board user interface 60, (ii) a remote device or system 90 (e.g., a mixing machine operator phone, Tablet or computer at the facility where the mixing machine is located, or a service technician phone, Tablet or computer remote from the facility where the mixing machine is located). The alerts may be in the form of a warning message if the characteristic is a trend of one of the conditions toward a defined limit (e.g., preset in memory) over time, or may be a fault message if the characteristic is the one of the conditions actually reaching the defined limit.
In this regard, Table 1 below shows exemplary sensors employed in one implementation of a mixing machine, and Table 2 below shows exemplary diagnostic messages identified and generated by the diagnostic control as alert indications.
In relation to the above noted messages, reference is made to
In some cases, the mixing machine control system includes multiple stored mix programs. For example, each mix program could include at least one mix speed and mix time, or in other cases multiple mix speeds with respective mix times, each of which will be carried out in sequence when the mix program is initiated and run on the machine. Each mix program may be selectable via the user interface of the machine. In such cases, the diagnostic control will track outputs from the sensors over time according to the mix program that results in the outputs, so that analysis of the outputs for detection of the characteristic indicative of a need for service or repair is conducted on a mix program by mix program basis. In this manner, potential condition discrepancies caused by differences between mixing operations can be avoided. By way of example, where a temperature condition is being monitored, the diagnostic control may include one temperature limit for a first mix program and another temperature limit for a second mix program, etc. Where an input current condition is being monitored, the diagnostic control may include one input current limit for a first mix program and another input current limit for a second mix program, etc. Where a power consumption condition is being monitored, the diagnostic control may include one power consumption limit for a first mix program and another power consumption limit for a second mix program, etc. Where a vibration condition is being monitored, the diagnostic control may include one vibration limit for a first mix program and another vibration limit for a second mix program, etc.
The on-board diagnostic control may be initially loaded with starting values for the monitored conditions by running each mixing program one or more times as a diagnostic set-up. The maximum or minimum limits for the conditions for each mixing program can then be set accordingly (e.g., selecting a limit that is a specified amount higher than the initial condition value determined during the diagnostic set-up). The on-board diagnostic control may run the diagnostics analysis of the data continuously or occasionally (e.g., at the end of each mixing operation, at the end of each day or each time the mixing machine is powered up).
The on-board diagnostic control may include more advanced features to not only produce an alert indication, but also to recommend specific service/repair actions. In other cases, the remote service technician device or system may include algorithms and further diagnostics to provide the service technician with such recommended service/repair actions. Predictive service/repair may be achieved that, in the long run, reduces mixing machine down time, as suggested by the system diagram 180 in
Referring now to
Mixers have a unique situation in that there is an oil reservoir and oil pump housed within the rotating planetary body. Because the planetary is rotating during operation, there is no way to get a wire to components inside of a planetary. For the planetary sensors 318, 320 to relay information, a wireless connection 322 is utilized. By way of example, Bluetooth or wifi technology can be utilized to transfer data between the two control units 302 and 304. In addition, sensors 318, 320 are designed as low power sensors that can be placed in stand-by mode so as to reduce power consumption. Limiting power consumption is important for the sensors 318, 320 in the planetary as they are powered by a remote battery 324 that will lose its charge over time and need to be replaced.
For the diagnostic data to be useful, thresholds and algorithms 326 are established and incorporated into the master control unit 302 alone or both the master control unit 302 and the planetary control unit 304. The sensor data collected and stored over time in an on-board historical database is evaluated to identify potential issues. Various diagnostics can then be carried out on-board the mixing machine, as explained below.
Predictive diagnostic algorithms may be provided for evaluation of the oil level sensor data. For example, if the oil level sensor 318 readings reflect that the planetary oil level is increasing over time, a likely cause is that the oil in the transmission case is leaking down into the planetary. In such cases, the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., leaking transmission case), as well as steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., service call required). If the oil level (either transmission or planetary) gradually decreases over a long period of time (e.g., the rate of decrease is below a specific threshold), the oil is most likely evaporating/breaking down, suggesting it should be refilled. In such cases, the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., oil breaking down), as well as steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., fill oil). If the oil level (transmission or planetary) decreases rapidly (e.g., the rate of decrease is above a set threshold), an oil seal is likely bad causing a leak, and a catastrophic failure may be imminent. In such cases, the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., severe oil leak), as well as steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., service call required), and/or take proactive action to prevent the failure (i.e., lockout further mixer operation or at least limit permitted drive speed). If the planetary oil level does not drop once the mixer is turned on and operating (e.g., drop in such condition is null or less than a low threshold), that is a sign that the planetary oil pump is not working to pull the oil out of the reservoir and a catastrophic failure may be imminent. In such cases, the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., faulty oil pump), as well as steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., service call required) and/or take proactive action to prevent the failure (i.e., lockout further mixer operation or at least limit permitted drive speed).
Predictive diagnostic algorithms may also be provided for evaluation of oil temperature sensor data. If the temperature sensor readings reflect a rapid rise in the temperature (e.g., rate of rise/increase above a high threshold) of the oil (transmission or planetary), this can indicate excessive wear on components or an oil pump malfunction. In such cases, the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., faulty oil pump), as well as steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., service call required), and/or take proactive action to prevent the failure (i.e., lockout further mixer operation or at least limit permitted drive speed). Some components will fail at certain temperatures, and therefore temperature thresholds can be set in the diagnostics to predict such potential failures. Again, in such cases the control system can issue an alert/message to the machine interface 314 and/or remote system 316 indicating the nature of the problem (e.g., excessive temperature condition), as well steps to be taken to address the problem (e.g., service call required), and/or take proactive action to prevent the failure (i.e., lockout further mixer operation or at least limit permitted drive speed).
Predictive diagnostic algorithms may also be provided for evaluation of accelerometer data. A relatively simple accelerometer can output both acceleration and time data. Basic accelerometers paired with the control unit 302 can take sampling rates fast enough (e.g., one data set in less than every 5 milliseconds) to pick up meaningful vibration characteristics. The control unit 302 can take this data and utilize FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) algorithms to change the acceleration vs time data 400 (see
Generally, the master control unit 302 will prompt each of the sensors at different respective times for data and analyze it (e.g., only one sensor at a time). Data can then be sent to a display (a screen on the mixer user interface or somewhere else that is easily accessible for the customer) and/or sent to the internet to a remote computer/terminal where the data can be stored and observed by a technician later. Information about each component's cycle life can also be stored on-board. Estimating the amount of cycles that each component has had can give a good indication of when that component will fail statistically.
As mentioned above, after the control system has analyzed the data using predictive diagnostic algorithms, actions can be taken. If a catastrophic failure is imminent, for instance, a warning to the customer can be displayed, the mixer can automatically shut down, and/or a notification can be sent to service personnel via email, virtual monitor, etc.
Advantages of the described system include reduced warranty cost by finding small problems before they lead to bigger and more expensive problems, reduced customer down time by replacing parts that are going bad before they fail, only one trip for the service technician for many applications is needed as diagnostics are already complete, and the system provides predictive, as opposed to reactive, servicing, which will lower customer cost and down time.
It is to be clearly understood that the above description is intended by way of illustration and example only, is not intended to be taken by way of limitation, and that other changes and modifications are possible.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1767002 | Meeker et al. | Jun 1930 | A |
| 1781321 | DeHuff | Nov 1930 | A |
| 2019911 | Meeker | Nov 1935 | A |
| 2181079 | DeHuff | Nov 1939 | A |
| 2185155 | Meeker et al. | Dec 1939 | A |
| 2251903 | Anstice et al. | Aug 1941 | A |
| 2616673 | Van Guilder | Nov 1952 | A |
| 3422330 | Swanke | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3951351 | Ernster et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4568193 | Contri et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4697929 | Muller | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4819460 | Obradovic | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4822172 | Stottmann | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4860816 | Bond | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4893942 | Stottmann | Jan 1990 | A |
| 5000578 | Artin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5087864 | Abel | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5140248 | Rowan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5204606 | Kuwahara et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5306083 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5348393 | Pappas, Jr. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5472276 | Ratermann et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5547278 | Xie | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5570955 | Swartwout et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5653535 | Xie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5690427 | Jennings | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5736828 | Turner et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5844343 | Horst | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5872435 | Bolte et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5906432 | Wade et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5934802 | Xie | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5955861 | Jeong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957021 | Meredith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6066074 | Marcinkiewicz | May 2000 | A |
| 6313597 | Elliott et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6429612 | Kume et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6638122 | Griffith, Sr. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6704212 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| D490271 | Short et al. | May 2004 | S |
| 6750629 | Shigemizu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756757 | Marcinkiewicz | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6883959 | Donthnier et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6953278 | Short et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6972541 | Matsushiro et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6998557 | McGuffin-Noll | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7005825 | Eguchi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7014354 | Donthnier et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7207711 | Huang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7273315 | Huang | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7384187 | Blackburn | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7387430 | Short | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7543980 | Blackburn | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7950843 | Blackburn | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8308344 | Short | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20020093877 | Brunswick et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030165068 | Tomonaga | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008005 | Sakai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120213 | Short et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120215 | Huang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208082 | Huang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050122836 | Boyle et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141340 | Donthnier et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060044935 | Benelli | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198240 | Short | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070195641 | Schnipke | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080221739 | Pryor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291777 | Schnipke | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20120226764 | Philip | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130033957 | Huang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130214716 | Barfus | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140269154 | Kolar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140345474 | Trench | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20180059790 | Kolar | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2448220 | May 2012 | EP |
| WO 2005112722 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2016145430 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180361335 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62464435 | Feb 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15906344 | Feb 2018 | US |
| Child | 16114605 | US |
