The present patent application relates to a mixer for concrete, powders, dry and semi-dry granules characterised by easy and safe internal cleaning.
As it is known, the traditional mixers used in the most diverse sectors, with particular reference to the building sector, are composed of a large parallepiped tank with cylindrical or omega-shaped walls, in which one or more rotational shafts operate horizontally to mix the mixtures loaded in the tank.
The said shafts are provided with radial blades designed to interfere efficaciously interference with the mixture to be mixed.
The transversal borders of the tank are provided with housings used to insert the mixing shafts, with the interposition of suitable bearings and seal gaskets.
The motor units designed to drive each mixing shaft into rotation are mounted in external position on one or both transversal borders.
The motor unit is composed of an electric motor that actuates, either directly or by means of a transmission belt, a gear motor that transmits the rotational motion to the mixing shaft with the interposition of a series of intermediate and reducing gears.
In general, the said electric motor has a speed of approximately 1400 rpm, which corresponds to a speed reduced by ½ in the gear motor and a speed of approximately 25 rpm in the mixing shaft.
During the practical use of the said mixers, it is frequently necessary—preferably on a daily basis and in any case before the residual mortar consolidates—to clean the tank used to mix the different materials.
More precisely, it is necessary to remove the solid deposits of the mixture from the internal surfaces of the tank (including mixing shafts and their blades); this operation is normally carried out by an operator who can be positioned outside or inside the tank to ensure more efficacious cleaning.
In particular, the cleaning operation of the mixing shafts contained in the tank is especially difficult.
In view of the fact that each shaft must be cleaned on the external side and in the intersection point of the blades along the entire length, it is a normal procedure in this case to drive the shaft into short angular travels (by a few degrees at a time) in order to make the cleaning operation easier for the operator inside the tank.
In this way, the surface sections of the shaft to be cleaned are always directed upwards, that is to say in a more comfortable position for the operator.
In particular, short angular travels are imposed to each mixing shaft by means of short electrical impulses imposed on the electric motor used in the motor unit.
Such an operative principle is not considered to be fully satisfactory, especially because of the risks for the operator inside the tank when the mixing shaft are subject to the aforementioned short travels.
Possible malfunctioning of the device or negligence of the operator in charge of giving the said short impulses to the motor unit could result in the uncontrolled rotation of the mixing shafts at the normal operation speed, with lethal consequences for the operator in charge of cleaning.
It must be noted that the shafts radially support the heavy mixing blades that could cause very serious injuries in case of interference with the body of the operator at the normal rotational speed.
The specific purpose of the present invention is to improve the safety of a concrete mixer during the cleaning operation carried out by the operator inside the tank.
To that end, the logic principle based on the aforementioned intermittent forward travels of the mixing shafts obtained with short “consecutive steps” of the motor units has been completely abandoned.
Alternatively, the motor unit of the mixing shaft has been associated with a small gear motor that is used for the ordinary operation of the mixer, but is advantageously used during the internal cleaning operation of the mixer.
In such a case, the small gear motor is used to drive in rotation, with the interposition of the traditional motor unit, the corresponding mixing shaft at a very low rotational speed (1 rpm).
It appears evident that the slow rotation of the mixing shaft is not dangerous for the cleaning operator inside the tank.
As a matter of fact, the operator will be able to avoid the heavy radial blades that rotate very slowly inside the mixing tank.
For purposes of clarity the description of the present invention continues with reference to the enclosed drawing, which is intended for purposes of illustration only and not in a limiting sense, whereby
With reference to the said figure, the mixer (1) is traditionally composed of a parallepiped tank (2) provided with one or more rotational shafts (3) horizontally supported between the transversal borders in order to mix the mixture contained in the tank (2).
Each shaft (3) is actuated by a corresponding motor unit (UM) composed of an electric motor (4) connected by means of a belt (5) to a gear motor (6) connected to the corresponding mixing shaft (3) by means of a cascade of intermediate and reducing gears.
The motor (4) is considerably powerful because, with the interposition of the gear motor (6) and the cascade of gears, it drives the corresponding mixing shaft (3) at a speed that is sufficiently high to ensure the perfect mixing of the dense heavy mixture contained in the tank (2).
Within the said traditional configuration, a free wheel (7) is applied to the shaft of the main electric motor (4), and mounted in such a position that it does not participate in the normal rotation of the electric motor (4).
The free wheel (7) is connected by means of a belt (8) to a pulley (9) splined to the shaft of an electric motor with low power (10), preferably 1 CV, which is mounted in adjacent position to the main electric motor (4), being capable of actuating it.
Before the cleaning operation, the main motor (4) is disconnected and the auxiliary motor with low power (10) is powered.
Because of the interposition of the transmission belt (9), the actuation of the auxiliary motor (10) causes the rotation of the free wheel (7) and consequently of the main motor (4) on which the free wheel (7) is splined.
The rotation imposed to the shaft of the main motor (4) is designed to drive in the same rotation direction the entire kinematic chain composed of the gear motor (6), the cascade of intermediate and reducing gears and the mixing shaft (3).
In view of the fact that the power of the auxiliary motor (10) is quite limited and the motor unit (UM) connected to it ensures the reduction of the rotation speed of the shaft of the same auxiliary motor (10), it appears evident that the mixing shaft (3) makes extremely slow rotation travels, which are almost imperceptible, thus permitting the operator in the tank to interfere with total safety and maximum efficiency with the surface of the tank and remove the solid deposits.
Preferably, the rotational speed of the auxiliary motor (10) is 60-70 rpm, which corresponds to a rotational speed of 1 rpm in the rotational shaft (3).
Finally, it must be noted that, without leaving the scope of this inventive idea, a different realisation mode of the “selective” connection between the auxiliary motor (10) and the main motor (4) of the motor unit (UM) can be provided.
Only for illustrative, not limiting purposes, a clutch can be provided between the shafts of the main (4) and auxiliary (10) motors, being evident, in this case, that the two motors can have the same rotational direction.
In case of mixers provided with a single mixing shaft and a single motor unit, a single auxiliary motor (10) is associated to the motor unit.
However, the use of a single auxiliary motor is also provided in case of mixers with two or more mixing shafts, because, in such a case, the mixing shafts are coupled by means of constant-velocity joints.
Because of this, although the auxiliary motor (10) drives in rotation only the specific unit motor associated with it, the rotation of the mixing shaft directly actuated by the latter involves the contemporary rotation (by means of the connection provided by the constant-velocity joint) of the adjacent s mixing shaft or shafts.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MC20070020 U | Apr 2007 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/050132 | 1/8/2008 | WO | 00 | 10/14/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/128794 | 10/30/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5348448 | Ikemoto et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5447371 | Agapiou | Sep 1995 | A |
6340439 | Hiraoka | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20090001096 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110095048 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1496802 | May 2004 | CN |
3814211 | Apr 1989 | DE |
2089597 | Jun 1982 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search report mailed Apr. 21, 2008 in PCT/EP2008/050132, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100128553 A1 | May 2010 | US |