Mobile activity status tracker

Abstract
A technique and apparatus to provide status tracking of presence and/or location of a mobile, wireless device to a requesting entity even outside of a particular wireless system. This allows wireless service providers the ability to monitor and log changes in the status of mobile stations within and/or outside their networks. Embodiments are disclosed wherein presence and/or location information is provided to entities outside of a particular servicing wireless network using the mechanisms of call processing components of a mobile network (e.g., call setup procedures), and using standard mechanisms currently available to any appropriately conforming Mobile Switching Center (MSC) element. A mobile activity status tracker (MAST) is disclosed which contains a database of information similar to the information contained in the Home Location Register. The MAST tracks and reports status and activity of mobile wireless devices in a wireless network using mobile registration message, mobile inactivity message forwarding, and/or mobile automatic notification of subscriber status to TCP/IP entities (e.g., application servers on the Internet or Intranet). The MAST system duplicates the same or similar information contained in a corresponding HLR, but is available as an external database entity which is not restricted by SS7 standards. The tracking need not track call-specific information, e.g., called telephone numbers or information regarding conversations sustained by the tracked wireless subscribers.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to wireless carriers, Internet service providers (ISPs), information content delivery services/providers, portal sites for mobile-terminated hosting of chat groups, and/or Internet chat session hosts. More particularly, it relates to the network perspective of mobile device functions and/or requirements such as ANSI-41 or ANSI-41C automatic registration, mobile presence, mobile location, and/or mobile availability.


2. Background of Related Art


The present invention relates to improvements to mobile wireless systems, which currently include mobility management, IS-41 mobility management, and/or registration systems, to support, e.g., Internet chat, ICQ, etc.


As is known, presence information and location information regarding a particular wireless device is recorded in a Home Location Register for the relevant wireless network.



FIG. 10 shows a conventional stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) architecture and message flow of a Mobile Registration Notification message (REGNOT).


In FIG. 10, a first wireless network 1060 includes a mobile switching center MSC 1010 and a stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) 1040. The SHLR 1040 and the MSC 1010 communicate over the public switched telephone network (PSTN) via one or more switching transfer points (STPs) 1030. The protocol used for communication is IS-41 or GSM MAP over signaling system No. 7 (SS7).


The service provider is typically given maintenance and configuration proprietary access to the database stored in the SHLR using an Operations and Maintenance Processor (OMP) and provisioning terminal console 1050, which may communicate with the SHLR using a point-to-point link, e.g., an X.25 link, an RS-232 link, or a TCP/IP link. Communications from the OMP 1050 typically relate to maintenance and configuration only, and do not relate to operational functions of the relevant wireless network.


A second wireless network 1070 servicing another wireless device 1090 includes another MSC 1020, and utilizes one or more STPs 1030 in the PSTN.


In the given scenario, assume that the wireless device 1090 in communication with the second wireless network 1070 is serviced by the service provider of the first wireless network 1060. Thus, presence and location information regarding the second wireless device 1090 is stored and updated in the SHLR 1040 corresponding to its servicing network.


To communicate presence and location information to the ‘home’ register of the second wireless device 1090, a MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) is sent in accordance with Signaling System #7 (SS7) standards using IS-41C protocol messages through the second wireless network 1070 to the MSC 1020 of the second wireless network 1070, The ‘presence’ of a wireless device relates to the wireless device being powered ON and reachable in the relevant wireless network.


The MSC 1020 forwards the MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) upon receipt to the STP 1030 as an IS-41 REGISTRATION NOTIFICATION (REGNOT) message (2.).


The STP 1030 forwards the REGNOT message (3.) to the appropriate SHLR 1040 servicing that particular wireless device 1090.


In this way, the Home Location Register of a particular wireless device 1040 is provided with presence and location information regarding the whereabouts and registration activity of a particular subscriber (e.g., wireless device 1090).



FIG. 10 relates to a Home Location Register which is installed as a separate network element. Using a SHLR 1040 as shown in FIG. 10, the SHLR 1040 must communicate with the associated MSC 1010 using SS7 signaling through the STP 1030. Presence and location information is updated in a subscriber's Home Location Register in a similar manner when the Home Location Register is integrated onto a common platform with the MSC element. This configuration is known as an integrated Home Location Register (I-HLR).



FIG. 11 shows a conventional integrated Home Location Register (I-HLR) architecture and message flow of a Mobile Registration Notification message (REGNOT) allowing proprietary communications between elements such as the MSC and I-HLR operating on a common platform.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 11, a MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) is sent to the MSC 1020 providing access to the roaming wireless device 1090, and the MSC 1020 forwards the REGNOT message (2.) to the relevant STPs 1030 as shown in FIG. 10. However, instead of forwarding the REGNOT message (3.) to the SHLR 1040 as shown in FIG. 10, the REGNOT message (3.) in FIG. 11 is forwarded to the common platform including both the MSC 1110 and the I-HLR 1140. The MSC 1110 and I-HLR 1140 may communicate with one another using any desired proprietary communications protocol, without need to conform to the SS7 signaling protocol at that point. Nevertheless, the I-HLR 1140 is updated with presence and location information regarding the roaming wireless device 1090.


In the conventional scenario, presence and location information is restricted to use by the ‘home’ service provider of a particular wireless device. Using conventional signaling protocols, other wireless networks are not provided with presence and location information regarding wireless devices other than those which subscribe to its services. The presence and location information is conventional used only by the home service provider for routing of call information (e.g., establishing a voice connection to a mobile wireless device).


Accordingly, there is a need for providing presence and location information to entities other than just those servicing a particular wireless device, thus enabling a new host of network services and applications.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a mobile activity status tracker comprises a database relating to individual wireless device subscribers. A communications channel allows entry of data into the database via a signaling transfer point. A TCP/IP communications channel communicates information contained in the database to an external entity over the Internet/Intranet.


A method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises forwarding a registration notification message from a Home Location Register to a mobile activity status tracker, and transmitting at least one of presence and location information relating to at least one wireless system subscriber to an application server via the Internet/Intranet.


Apparatus for providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers in accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention comprises means for copying and forwarding to a mobile activity status tracker a registration notification message sent to a Home Location Register, and means for transmitting at least one of presence and location information relating to at least one wireless system subscriber to an application server via an Internet/Intranet.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary architecture and information flow of a mobile activity status tracker (MAST) system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a more detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system corresponding to a stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) including a Mobile Registration Trigger (MRT) mechanism utilizing message flows in conformance with SS7 standards and IS-41 standards, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 2A shows a block diagram of the basic elements of an exemplary MAST system shown in FIG. 2.



FIG. 3 is a detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system corresponding to an integrated Home Location Register (I-HLR) including a Mobile Registration Trigger mechanism integrated with a mobile switching center (MSC) on a common platform, utilizing message flows in conformance with SS7 standards and IS-41 standards, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system corresponding to a stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) including a Registration Notification copy function in a signaling transfer point (STP) and a TCP/IP connection (or SS7 connection) to the MAST application, particularly useful in wireless networks having HLRs which do not include a mobile registration trigger (MRT), in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 5A is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters of a Mobile Registration Notification (REGNOT) message in conformance with SS7 and IS-41 standards utilized for determination of location information in a MAST system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 5B is a detailed depiction of all conventional parameters of a REGNOT message.



FIG. 6 is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters of a Mobile Subscriber Inactive message in conformance with SS7 and IS-41 standards utilized for determination of inactive presence information in a MAST system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 7A is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters such as location in an exemplary Internet Protocol (IP) message sent from the MAST system to an application server (e.g., a Chat Server) via the Internet, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 7B is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters in another exemplary IP message such as a log of past presence and location information for a particular wireless device sent from the MAST system to an application server (e.g., a law enforcement authority) via the Internet, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary Mobile Station Identity (MSID) ordered table, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.



FIG. 9 shows an exemplary process by which the parsed message portions are processed.



FIG. 10 shows a conventional stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) architecture and message flow of a Mobile Registration Notification message (REGNOT).



FIG. 11 shows a conventional integrated Home Location Register (I-HLR) architecture and message flow of a Mobile Registration Notification message (REGNOT) allowing proprietary communications between elements such as the MSC and I-HLR operating on a common platform.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention relates to a technique and apparatus to provide status tracking of presence and/or location of a mobile, wireless device to a requesting entity even outside of a particular wireless system. This allows wireless service providers the ability to monitor and log changes in the status of mobile stations within and/or outside their networks enabling the development of multiple applications and network services. Embodiments are disclosed wherein presence and/or location information is provided to entities outside of a particular servicing wireless network using the mechanisms of call processing components of a mobile network (e.g., call setup procedures), and using standard mechanisms currently available to any appropriately conforming Mobile Switching Center (MSC) element.


Mobile presence and location are key concepts for location-based services and applications which require knowledge of mobile station/subscriber availability. Currently, conventional systems do not provide such wireless intelligent network (WIN) service for wireless devices.


It is important to note that existing systems and techniques have been conventionally located outside of a wireless network. As such, the existing systems have not been privy to, nor had the need to be privy to, triggers needed to obtain true mobile presence or location information.


A disclosed embodiment is a software application package which tracks and reports status and activity of mobile wireless devices in a wireless network using mobile registration message, inactivity message forwarding, and/or mobile automatic notification of subscriber status to TCP/IP entities. This embodiment of a mobile activity status tracker is referred to herein as a Mobile Activity Status Tracker (MAST).


In accordance with the principles of the present invention, status changes that are recorded are sent via TCP/IP communications to other service provider-specific applications. The MAST system duplicates the same or similar information of a corresponding HLR, but is available as an external database entity which functions and communications are not restricted by SS7 standards.


Tracking in accordance with the principles of the present invention utilizes registration/de-registration activity of mobile stations. Utilizing status changes for a particular mobile station, key events can be noted regarding presence and/or location of the particular mobile station.


The MAST application offers entities (e.g., Internet and others) outside of a wireless infrastructure the ability to receive presence and/or location information regarding a particular mobile station to network entities outside of that which is servicing a particular wireless device. As disclosed, the MAST application has the ability to pull presence and/or location information or to push presence and/or location information to a requesting entity as desired.


Certain capabilities such as Mobile Registration Trigger/Registration Notification Forward Message and SMPP client which are basic to this application, are described in detail in two pending U.S. Applications by the same Assignee as the present case. In particular, an exemplary SMSC is described in co-pending and co-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/322,929, entitled “Short Message Service Notification Between Multiple Short Message Service Centers”, filed Jun. 1, 1999, by Timothy J. Lorello and Reuben D. Hart, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, an exemplary Prepaid functionality and architecture is described in co-pending and co-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/533,805, entitled “Prepaid Call Management In Intelligent Network”, filed Mar. 23, 2000, by Elizabeth Countryman, Timothy J. Lorello, Mark Titus, and Dara Ung, the entirety of which is explicitly incorporated herein by reference.


The Mobile Activity Status Tracker (MAST) is a Service Package Application (SPA) that allows wireless service providers to monitor and log changes in the status of mobile stations within their networks. The status changes that are recorded are sent via TCP/IP to other servers for service provider-specific applications. The tracking involves the registration/de-registration activity and location of the mobile stations. The tracking need not track call-specific information, e.g., called telephone numbers or information regarding conversations sustained by the tracked wireless subscribers.


Some disclosed embodiments relate to the use of a Home Location Register (HLR) which is integrated with a Mobile Switching Center (MSC) on a common platform, referred to herein as Integrated Home Location Registers (I-HLRs) commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. in Murray Hill, N.J. Other embodiments relate to the use of a stand-alone HLR separate from the MSC platform, referred to herein as Stand alone HLR's (S-HLR). All types of HLRs are collectively referred to herein as an HLR.


The disclosed MAST SPA is implemented on an Advantage Service Control Point (SCP) Wireless Intelligent Network Platform, commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. The SCP provides the required ANSI SS7 and TCP/IP protocol support and Service Circuit Handlers (SCH) for the MAST SPA.


In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the MAST SPA receives mobile activity notifications from an HLR, and forwards selected parameters upon request or configuration to servers external to the wireless network over a TCP/IP communication link (e.g., over the Internet or over an Intranet).



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary architecture and information flow of a mobile activity status tracker (MAST) system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, as shown in FIG. 1, the operation of the exemplary MAST SPA includes the following exemplary steps:


(1) The handset exchanges activity information with the I-HLR, which in turn sends the Mobile Station Identity (MSID) of the mobile station and a set of relevant parameters to the MAST SPA in an (MRT) message.


(2) The MAST SPA creates a temporary record for that mobile handset based on the MSID. The MAST performs a lookup in a database of existing records, using the MSID as a key. If there is no record for the MSID, then the temporary record is stored in the database. If there is a record for the same MSID, the MAST compares the temporary record with that found in the database to determine any changes in the activity status of the mobile station (or any other relevant parameters). If the activity status is the same (i.e., unchanged), the MAST overwrites the old record with the new one. On the other hand, if the activity status has changed, the activity status of the relevant mobile wireless device will be Notified or Forwarded to one or more application servers having access to the Internet using an appropriate TCP/IP interface and appropriate IP addresses (or other suitable protocol and communication path, e.g., SS7). To this end, the MAST SPA will forward a set of selected parameters (e.g., a subset of the parameters available in the temporary record) to one or more requesting or pre-configured applications servers using corresponding Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. The MAST then replaces the existing, older record with the new, updated record.


Preferably, the MAST resides on an SCP and accepts copies of IS-41 Registration Notification and MSInactive messages from the HLR(s).



FIG. 2 is a more detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system 200 corresponding to a stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) 240 including a Mobile Registration Trigger (MRT) mechanism utilizing message flows in conformance with SS7 standards and IS-41 standards, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, FIG. 2 shows a MAST system 200 implemented by a particular service provider corresponding to a first wireless network 260. The first wireless network 260 also includes an MSC 1010, and a SHLR 240.


A second wireless network 1070 is shown for completeness and perspective. The second wireless network 1070 includes an MSC 1020, and services a wireless device 1090.


The MAST 200 provides presence and/or location information regarding any or all subscriber's of the first wireless network to external entities, without the need to change current communication standards, e.g., utilizing otherwise conventional SS7 and IS-41 communication messages.


The MAST 200 includes information similar to that contained in the SHLR, e.g., relating to the presence and/or location of serviced wireless devices. However, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, the MAST 200 may include additional information, and/or logged information over time with respect to each individual subscriber. The MAST 200 may be implemented on a same type platform as that implementing the SHLR 240, e.g., an SCP commercially available from LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.



FIG. 2A shows a block diagram of the basic elements of an exemplary MAST system 200 shown in FIG. 2.


Importantly, the MAST 200 includes a TCP/IP interface 270 and internal module 201 allowing appropriate operational access to subscriber presence and/or location information maintained therein. Thus, any or all external application servers 290 (e.g., chat servers, law enforcement servers, etc.) may access subscriber presence and or location information regarding a wireless service provider's subscribers via the Internet 280.


The subscriber's presence and/or location information maintained in a subscriber presence/location database 205 may be pre-configured for transmission to various preset application servers 290 via the TCP/IP (i.e., non-SS7 protocol) module 201 and associated link 270. Alternatively, presence and/or location information regarding any or all subscriber's serviced by the MAST 200 may be provided to an application server 290 upon request by the application server 290.


Referring back to FIG. 2, the particular applications which can be implemented by the various application servers 290 is virtually limitless. Any application which can make use of the presence and/or location information regarding any or all wireless subscribers (regardless of whether or not they are inside or external to a particular wireless network) may utilize the information contained in the database of the MAST 200 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


The message flow shown in FIG. 2 relates to that of a stand-alone HLR 240. The message flow utilizing an integrated HLR is shown in FIG. 3. The message flow in FIG. 2 is as follows.


A MOBILE REGISTRATION message (1.) is transmitted by a relevant wireless device 1090 through the host wireless network #2 1070 to its MSC 1020. That MSC 1020 sends a MOBILE REGISTRATION NOTIFICATION (REGNOT) message (2.) to an STP 1030, which forwards a REGNOT message (3.) to the SHLR 240. Up to this point the message flow is as in the conventional system shown in FIG. 10.


However, as shown in FIG. 2, the SHLR 240 implements a message referred to herein as a MOBILE REGISTRATION TRIGGER (4. in FIG. 2). The MOBILE REGISTRATION TRIGGER (4.) forwards a received REGNOT message (3.) back out to the STP 230 as a REGNOT message (5.), destined for the MAST 200.


The STP 230 forwards the REGNOT message (5.) from the SHLR to the MAST 200 using a REGNOT message (6.). Thus, the SHLR 240 shown in FIG. 2 is an otherwise conventional SHLR, but additionally includes the functions necessary to implement a Mobile Registration Trigger (MRT) to forward the REGNOT message (5.) to the MAST system 200 via the STP 230 using another forwarded REGNOT message (6.). With the architecture of the embodiment of FIG. 2, a service provider may need to upgrade software running on an associated SHLR 240, but need not upgrade their MSC 1010 or STP 230 from those otherwise conventionally available or already installed, providing significant cost savings and efficiency.


In response to the REGNOT message (6.) received from the STP 1030, the MAST 200 updates its database 205 appropriately. The information contained in the database 205 is then made available as appropriate over the TCP/IP link 270 to an external device, e.g., using an Intranet or the Internet 280, e.g., to all requesters, to only some requesters paying a particular fee for such a service, etc.


The service provider 250 is given operational and maintenance access to the MAST 200 similarly to conventional access given to an SHLR, e.g., using an X.25, RS-232 or TCP/IP link.



FIG. 3 is a detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system 200 corresponding to an integrated Home Location Register (I-HLR) including a Mobile Registration Trigger mechanism integrated with a mobile switching center (MSC) on a common platform, utilizing message flows in conformance with SS7 standards and IS-41 standards, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, FIG. 3 shows that when using an I-HLR 340, the communications between the MSC/I-HLR common platform and the STP 330 are typically made over an SS7 link to the common platform, and that the elements on the common platform (e.g., the MSC 310 and the I-HLR 340) may communicate with one another in proprietary ways without the need to conform to SS7 or other external signaling requirements.


The I-HLR 340 shown in FIG. 3 is an otherwise conventional I-HLR, but additionally includes the functions necessary to implement a Mobile Registration Trigger (MRT) to forward the REGNOT message (5.) to the MAST system 200 via the STP 230 using another forwarded REGNOT message (6.). With the architecture of the embodiment of FIG. 3, a service provider may need to upgrade software running on an associated I-HLR 340, but need not upgrade their MSC 310 or STP 330 from those otherwise conventionally available or already installed.



FIG. 4 is a detailed architecture and information flow of an embodiment of a MAST system corresponding to a stand-alone Home Location Register (SHLR) including a Registration Notification copy function in a signaling transfer point (STP) and a TCP/IP connection (or SS7 connection) to the MAST application, particularly useful in wireless networks having HLRs which do not include a mobile registration trigger (MRT), in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, FIG. 4 importantly shows an STP 430 including otherwise conventional functions, but in addition includes a REGNOT copy and forward function.


The REGNOT copy and forward function in the STP 430 copies the REGNOT message (2.) received from an MSC 1020, and forwards a REGNOT copy message (3b.) to the MAST 200. The STP 430 also sends the otherwise conventional REGNOT message (3.) to the SHLR 1040.


The STP 430 shown in FIG. 4 is an otherwise conventional STP, but additionally includes the functions necessary to implement a COPY and FORWARD message to generate a copy of the REGNOT message (3.) sent to the SHLR 1040 as a copy REGNOT message (3b.) sent to the MAST 200. With the architecture of the embodiment of FIG. 4, a service provider may need to upgrade software running on an associated STP 430, but need not upgrade their MSC(s) 1010 or SHLR(s) 1040 from those otherwise conventionally available or already installed.


The MAST system architecture shown in FIG. 4 has the advantage of eliminating some communications (e.g., the MRT trigger (4.) and the REGNOT message (5.) shown in FIG. 3), which is particularly important because the MRT trigger (4.) is an enhanced proprietary feature (i.e., not standard) to some HLRs.


The service may be provided in a provisionless mode, and all the necessary subscriber information may reside on the HLR. Thus, there is preferably no specific subscriber provisioning necessary on the MAST SPA. Rather, the subscriber data may be maintained at the relevant HLR. The amount of memory, e.g., random access memory (RAM) and the number of SS7 links required by the SCP platform implementing the MAST SPA may be determined based on the subscriber count to be supported.


For instance, as a general guideline, consider the following example. Assuming a load of 500,000 subscribers, one (1) Message Registration Trigger (MRT) per subscriber per hour, five (5) Mobile Inactivity Triggers (MITs) per subscriber per day, 1 KB of memory per subscriber, and an average SS7 message length of 100 octects, the number of SS7 links required in the disclosed embodiment for this configuration is approximately four (4), along with approximately 500 MB of RAM.


Use of Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) between MSCs can be implemented in multiple I-HLR environments as well.


From the perspective of a wireless service provider, MAST allows the implementation of an endless array of services and/or applications that can utilize presence and/or location information regarding a wireless device. Specific implementations of services will depend on the capabilities of the application servers that receive the information from the MAST. For instance, knowledge of registration activity in and of itself represents a huge benefit for the service provider from a marketing perspective because it can provide additional information regarding subscriber's habits, and general demographic data collection.


The MAST techniques and apparatus may also be used for law enforcement purposes. For instance, data relating to mobile station activity may be used, e.g., as evidence to build a legal case against an offender.


As another benefit, subscribers of a wireless service provider can be provided with an enhanced protection mechanism against fraud by allowing faster detection and/or tracking of delinquent mobile devices.


Depending upon particular parameters used, other services may be implemented. For instance, with knowledge of the location of a particular mobile station, a wireless service provider may implement an “Emergency Location” plan. Using such a service, mobile subscribers can have activity information (e.g., presence and/or location information, together with date and time) relating to the use of their mobile device transmitted to the MAST SPA in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The MAST SPA will log the presence and/or location information regarding relevant mobile subscribers served by the associated HRL, and pass the logged information on to any entity on the Internet or other entity or network, providing an accurate and up-to-date information source. Using the “Emergency Location” plan, the logged location information may be used by authorities to locate a person associated with that particular mobile device easier.



FIG. 5A is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters of a Mobile Registration Notification (REGNOT) message in conformance with SS7 and IS-41 standards utilized for determination of location information in a MAST system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. FIG. 5B is a detailed depiction of all conventional parameters of a REGNOT message.


In particular, the REGNOT message parameters utilized by the MAST may be any or all parameters included or inferred from information within the standard REGNOT message shown in FIG. 5B. For instance, the cell site ID 502 and/or sector ID 504 of the cell servicing the relevant wireless device may be used to provide a location of the wireless device, and date and time of a communication may be used for presence information.


Other information such as power level 506 can be used to infer and further refine the location information. For instance, a lower power level received by the wireless device 1090 (and/or higher power output by the wireless device 1090) may be used to infer a longer distance from the relevant cell site receiving transmissions from the wireless device 1090. Conversely, a lower power level might infer that the wireless device 1090 is closer to the cell site. Thus, a sort of ‘poor man's GPS’ can be provided to external entities regarding the location of a subscriber's wireless device.



FIG. 6 is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters of a Mobile Subscriber Inactive message in conformance with SS7 and IS-41 standards utilized for determination of inactive presence information in a MAST system, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


In particular, a MOBILE SUBSCRIBER INACTIVE message follows the same paths as does the REGNOT messages shown in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4. While the REGNOT message indicates an active wireless device, the receipt of a MOBILE SUBSCRIBER INACTIVE message with respect to a particular subscriber may be logged in the database 205 of the MAST 200 as presence information, i.e., that the wireless device may no longer be present.



FIG. 7A is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters such as location in an exemplary Internet Protocol (IP) message sent from the MAST system to an application server (e.g., a Chat Server) via the Internet, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


The particular information contained either in the database 205 of the MAST and/or which is transmitted over the TCP/IP connection 270 and the Internet 280 may depend upon the particular applications operating on any of the application servers 290. Rudimentary information may include, e.g., an IP address of the application server 290, an ID of the relevant mobile wireless device, presence information such as a date and time of activity, and location information either real or inferred. Real information may include the cell site ID and/or sector ID. Inferred or extrapolated information may include, e.g., a delta distance corresponding to a power level of the wireless device's transmitter during a last contact.



FIG. 7B is a simplified depiction of relevant parameters in another exemplary IP message such as a log of past presence and location information for a particular wireless device sent from the MAST system to an application server (e.g., a law enforcement authority) via the Internet, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.


For instance, as shown in FIG. 7B, presence and/or location information may be logged into a historical file for each subscriber/wireless device. A particular mobile ID together with a series of database entries corresponding to different REGNOT commands and/or MOBILE SUBSCRIBER INACTIVE messages received by the MAST can be provided to one or more particular application servers desiring such information.


Alternatively, the presence and/or location information transmitted to a desiring application server 190 may relate to a group of subscribers having a common attribute (e.g., most active subscribers, least active, subscribers, subscribers living in a particular region, etc.).


As disclosed, activity status information is tracked by the MAST as follows. Initially, the MAST receives a Mobile Registration message via a Mobile Registration Trigger (MRT), alternatively referred to as a Registration Forward Message, from the relevant MSC/HLR (I-HLR or S-HLR), and appropriately updates the activity status in the database. Upon power down of the relevant wireless device, the MAST will receive a Mobile De-Registration message via a Mobile Inactive Trigger (MIT) from the relevant MSC/HLR, and appropriately updates the activity status in the database.


When a new message (e.g., a mobile registration message or mobile de-registration message) is received, the MAST application preferably parses the message, e.g., into up to 10 parameters, and stores the parsed message portions in an appropriate MSID ordered table.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary Mobile Station Identity (MSID) ordered table is shown in FIG. 8.



FIG. 9 shows an exemplary process by which the parsed message portions are processed.


In particular, as shown in step 202 of FIG. 9, the process determines if a new REGNOT or MSINACT has been received.


If a record for the same MSID is found in the table of FIG. 8, in step 204 a comparison of the status and key parameters within the two records will be made.


In step 208, if the status (ACT to DEACT or DEACT TO ACT) or one of the key parameters are different from that of the previous record, a subset of key parameters up to and including all key parameters from this new record will be sent to at least one, but possibly multiple IP addresses on a network.


In steps 206 and 210, the old record is replaced in the MSID table with the new, most recent record.


The MAST receives information directly from the HLR or the STP (e.g., I-HLR or S-HLR), which has previously validated the MSID and determined the need to forward the information to the MAST.


Administration of the MAST may include, e.g., configuration and maintenance of the following:

    • Point-codes and Subsystem numbers of the I-HLRs that will send information to the MAST SPA.
    • Parameters that the I-HLR will forward to the MAST SPA in the MRT and MIT messages.
    • Parameters that the MAST SPA will forward to the application servers.
    • Destination IP addresses and Port numbers of the application servers.
    • Expiration time for records that have not experienced changes over a configurable period of time.
    • Size of the rotating log file.


There is preferably only one record per MSID in the MAST. The relevant service provider is preferably given access to the database stored in the MAST, e.g., through the conventional operational maintenance processor (OMP).


Due to its nature, the content of this database is likely to change rapidly over time, therefore the MAST database may provide only a snapshot of the activity status of all the relevant wireless devices at any given time.


The MAST preferably keeps a temporary log of the messages sent to the application services in a rotating file. This rotating file may have a configurably fixed size, and may overwrite itself with more recent information, e.g., after a desired period of time determined by the level of message traffic. This log provides a historical representation of the activity of specific wireless devices, or groups of wireless devices.


Reports may be generated for the relevant service provider, e.g., through the OMP or via a TCP/IP connection to the Internet. Possible reports can include, e.g., various information depending upon the parameters that the relevant HLR sends to the MAST, and/or specific needs and selections made by the particular service provider.


In case the subscriber base increases, the platform can be easily scaled to increase capacity.


Being a Wireless Intelligent Network service, MAST takes advantage of the improved reliability, scalability and performance of the Advantage Platform and the flexibility of the intelligent network approach.


Additionally, MAST is an Intelligent Network application that can be executed simultaneously on a single SCP platform, such as a Short Message Service Center, Over The Air Activation, PrePaid Wireless, etc. This fact spreads the cost of the platform over several services, thus allowing the service provider to price them in a competitive way. From an operating standpoint, a single platform is easier to manage resulting in reduced maintenance costs.


While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A mobile activity status tracker, comprising: an activity receiver to receive a duplicate of a registration notification message from a network point independent of a home location register;a TCP/IP communications channel for communicating a status data message associated with said registration notification message to at least one application server over an Internet protocol (IP) communication network;a database to store registration notification messages associated with individual wireless devices, said registration notification messages having been previously forwarded by said home location register to a network point independent of said home location register; anda transmitter to transmit said status data message to a destination device.
  • 2. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, further comprising: a communications channel to allow entry of said registration notification message into said database from said network point to said mobile activity status tracker without reliance on a communication with said home location register.
  • 3. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 2, wherein: said communications channel utilizes a TCP/IP communications protocol.
  • 4. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said home location register is a stand-alone Home Location Register.
  • 5. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said home location register is integrated with a message servicing center on a common platform.
  • 6. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said mobile activity status tracker is external to said home location register servicing individual wireless device subscribers.
  • 7. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said mobile activity status tracker is adapted to compare a temporary record with entries in said database to determine any changes in activity status relating to a relevant wireless device and overwrite an existing record in said database with said temporary record if a change in activity status is determined.
  • 8. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said destination device is an application server.
  • 9. The mobile activity status tracker according to claim 1, wherein: said Home Location Register is an integrated Home Location Register on a common platform with a message service center (MSC).
  • 10. A method of providing a database of presence or location information regarding wireless system subscribers, comprising: receiving, at a mobile activity status tracker, a duplicate of a registration notification message from a network point independent of a home location register;communicating, with a TCP/IP communications channel, a status data message associated with said registration notification message to at least one application server over an Internet protocol (IP) communication network;a database to store registration notification messages associated with individual wireless devices, said registration notification messages having been previously forwarded by said home location register independent of said home location register; andtransmitting said status data message to a destination device.
  • 11. The method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers according to claim 10, further comprising: storing, at a database relating to individual wireless device subscribers, said registration notification message associated with at least one of said individual wireless device subscribers.
  • 12. The method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers according to claim 10, further comprising: entering said registration notification message into said database from said network point to said mobile activity status tracker without reliance on a communication with said home location register.
  • 13. The method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers according to claim 10, further comprising: comparing a temporary record with entries in said database to determine any changes in activity status relating to a relevant wireless device; andat least one of overwriting an existing record with said temporary record if a change in activity status is determined, and keeping a log of at least one of history of activity and status changes for at least one wireless subscriber.
  • 14. The method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers according to claim 10, wherein: said registration notification message is forwarded through a network point between said home location register and said mobile activity status tracker.
  • 15. The method of providing a database of presence and location information regarding wireless system subscribers according to claim 10, wherein: said home location register is one of a stand-alone Home Location Register and an Integrated Home Location Register (IHLR).
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/929,729, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker”, filed on Feb. 11, 2011; which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/490,108, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker,” filed on Jul. 21, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,894,825; which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/576,022, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker,” filed on May 23, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,110,773; which in turn claims priority from U.S. provisional application 60/196,104, entitled “Mobile Activity Status Tracker,” filed Apr. 11, 2000, the entirety of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (361)
Number Name Date Kind
3920908 Kraus Nov 1975 A
4310726 Asmuth Jan 1982 A
4399330 Kuenzel Aug 1983 A
4494119 Wimbush Jan 1985 A
4651156 Martinez Mar 1987 A
4680785 Akiyama Jul 1987 A
4706275 Kamil Nov 1987 A
4725719 Oncken Feb 1988 A
4756020 Fodale Jul 1988 A
4776000 Parienti Oct 1988 A
4776003 Harris Oct 1988 A
4776037 Rozanski, Jr. Oct 1988 A
4831647 D'Avello May 1989 A
4852149 Zwick Jul 1989 A
4852155 Barraud Jul 1989 A
4860341 D'Avello Aug 1989 A
4891638 Davis Jan 1990 A
4891650 Sheffer Jan 1990 A
4901340 Parker Feb 1990 A
4935956 Hellwarth Jun 1990 A
4952928 Carroll Aug 1990 A
4998240 Williams Mar 1991 A
5003585 Richer Mar 1991 A
5014206 Scribner et al. May 1991 A
5043736 Darnell et al. Aug 1991 A
5046088 Margulies Sep 1991 A
5055851 Sheffer Oct 1991 A
5068656 Sutherland Nov 1991 A
5068891 Marshall Nov 1991 A
5070329 Jasinaki Dec 1991 A
5081667 Drori et al. Jan 1992 A
5103449 Jolissaint Apr 1992 A
5119104 Heller Jun 1992 A
5127040 D'Avello Jun 1992 A
5128938 Borras Jul 1992 A
5138648 Palomeque Aug 1992 A
5138650 Stahl Aug 1992 A
5144283 Arens et al. Sep 1992 A
5144649 Zicker Sep 1992 A
5159625 Zicker Oct 1992 A
5161180 Chavous Nov 1992 A
5177478 Wagai et al. Jan 1993 A
5187710 Chau Feb 1993 A
5189663 Williams Feb 1993 A
5193215 Olmer Mar 1993 A
5208756 Song May 1993 A
5214789 George May 1993 A
5216703 Roy Jun 1993 A
5218367 Sheffer et al. Jun 1993 A
5220593 Zicker Jun 1993 A
5223844 Mansell et al. Jun 1993 A
5233642 Renton Aug 1993 A
5235630 Moody et al. Aug 1993 A
5239570 Koster et al. Aug 1993 A
5265155 Castro Nov 1993 A
5266944 Carroll et al. Nov 1993 A
5274802 Altine Dec 1993 A
5276444 McNair Jan 1994 A
5289472 Cho Feb 1994 A
5289527 Tiedemann Feb 1994 A
5291543 Freese Mar 1994 A
5293642 Lo Mar 1994 A
5297189 Chabernaud Mar 1994 A
5299132 Wortham Mar 1994 A
5301223 Amadon Apr 1994 A
5301234 Mazziotto Apr 1994 A
5309501 Kozik May 1994 A
5311572 Friedes May 1994 A
5321735 Breeden Jun 1994 A
5325302 Izidon et al. Jun 1994 A
5325418 McGregor Jun 1994 A
5327144 Stilp Jul 1994 A
5334974 Simms et al. Aug 1994 A
5339352 Armstrong Aug 1994 A
5341410 Aron Aug 1994 A
5341414 Popke Aug 1994 A
5343493 Karimullah Aug 1994 A
5347568 Moody et al. Sep 1994 A
5351235 Lahtinen Sep 1994 A
5353335 D'Urso Oct 1994 A
5359182 Schilling Oct 1994 A
5359642 Castro Oct 1994 A
5359643 Gammino Oct 1994 A
5361212 Class et al. Nov 1994 A
5363425 Mufti et al. Nov 1994 A
5369699 Page Nov 1994 A
5374936 Feng Dec 1994 A
5379451 Nakagoshi et al. Jan 1995 A
5381338 Wysocki et al. Jan 1995 A
5384825 Dillard Jan 1995 A
5387993 Heller et al. Feb 1995 A
5388147 Grimes Feb 1995 A
5390339 Bruckert et al. Feb 1995 A
5394158 Chia Feb 1995 A
5396227 Carroll et al. Mar 1995 A
5398190 Wortham Mar 1995 A
5404580 Simpson Apr 1995 A
5406614 Hara Apr 1995 A
5408513 Busch, Jr. Apr 1995 A
5408519 Pierce Apr 1995 A
5408682 Ranner Apr 1995 A
5412726 Nevoux May 1995 A
5418537 Bird May 1995 A
5423076 Westergren et al. Jun 1995 A
5432841 Rimer Jul 1995 A
5434789 Fraker Jul 1995 A
5438615 Moen Aug 1995 A
5440621 Castro Aug 1995 A
5454024 Lebowitz Sep 1995 A
5457737 Wen Oct 1995 A
5461390 Hoshen Oct 1995 A
5470233 Fruchterman et al. Nov 1995 A
5479408 Will Dec 1995 A
5479482 Grimes Dec 1995 A
5485161 Vaughn Jan 1996 A
5485163 Singer et al. Jan 1996 A
5488563 Chazelle et al. Jan 1996 A
5502761 Duncan Mar 1996 A
5506893 Buscher Apr 1996 A
5508931 Snider Apr 1996 A
5509056 Ericsson Apr 1996 A
5513243 Kage Apr 1996 A
5515287 Hakoyama et al. May 1996 A
5517555 Amadon May 1996 A
5517559 Hayashi May 1996 A
5519403 Bickley et al. May 1996 A
5532690 Hertel Jul 1996 A
5535434 Siddoway et al. Jul 1996 A
5539398 Hall et al. Jul 1996 A
5543776 L'Esperance et al. Aug 1996 A
5552772 Janky et al. Sep 1996 A
5555286 Tendler Sep 1996 A
5568119 Schipper et al. Oct 1996 A
5570416 Kroll Oct 1996 A
5574648 Pilley Nov 1996 A
5579372 Astrom Nov 1996 A
5579376 Kennedy Nov 1996 A
5583918 Nakagawa Dec 1996 A
5586175 Hogan Dec 1996 A
5588009 Will Dec 1996 A
5592535 Klotz Jan 1997 A
5604486 Lauro et al. Feb 1997 A
5606313 Allen Feb 1997 A
5606850 Nakamura Mar 1997 A
5610815 Gudat et al. Mar 1997 A
5610972 Emery Mar 1997 A
5614890 Fox Mar 1997 A
5615116 Gudat et al. Mar 1997 A
5621793 Bednarek et al. Apr 1997 A
5625669 McGregor Apr 1997 A
5628051 Salin May 1997 A
5633912 Tsoi May 1997 A
5640447 Fonseca Jun 1997 A
5673306 Amadon et al. Sep 1997 A
5682600 Salin Oct 1997 A
5692037 Friend Nov 1997 A
5719918 Serbetciouglu Feb 1998 A
5722067 Fougnies Feb 1998 A
5732346 Lazaridis Mar 1998 A
5740534 Ayerst et al. Apr 1998 A
5761618 Lynch et al. Jun 1998 A
5767795 Schaphorst Jun 1998 A
5768509 Gunluk Jun 1998 A
5774533 Patel Jun 1998 A
5778313 Fougnies Jul 1998 A
5787357 Salin Jul 1998 A
5790636 Marshall Aug 1998 A
5793859 Matthews Aug 1998 A
5794142 Vanttila et al. Aug 1998 A
5797091 Clise et al. Aug 1998 A
5797094 Houde et al. Aug 1998 A
5797096 Lupien et al. Aug 1998 A
5802492 DeLorme et al. Sep 1998 A
5806000 Vo et al. Sep 1998 A
5815816 Isumi Sep 1998 A
5822700 Hult et al. Oct 1998 A
5826185 Wise Oct 1998 A
5828740 Khuc et al. Oct 1998 A
5850599 Seiderman Dec 1998 A
5854975 Fougnies Dec 1998 A
5867787 Vudali Feb 1999 A
5878347 Joensuu Mar 1999 A
5889473 Wicks Mar 1999 A
5905736 Ronen et al. May 1999 A
5920820 Qureshi Jul 1999 A
5920821 Seazholtz et al. Jul 1999 A
5930701 Skog Jul 1999 A
5940472 Newman Aug 1999 A
5943399 Bannister et al. Aug 1999 A
5946629 Sawyer et al. Aug 1999 A
5946630 Willars et al. Aug 1999 A
5950130 Coursey Sep 1999 A
5953398 Hill Sep 1999 A
5953404 Fikis Sep 1999 A
5953662 Lindquist Sep 1999 A
5974052 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5974054 Couts et al. Oct 1999 A
5978685 Laiho Nov 1999 A
5987323 Huotari Nov 1999 A
5991301 Christie Nov 1999 A
5999811 Molne Dec 1999 A
6031840 Christie Feb 2000 A
6035025 Hanson Mar 2000 A
6038444 Schipper Mar 2000 A
6049710 Nilsson Apr 2000 A
6052597 Ekstrom Apr 2000 A
6058300 Hanson May 2000 A
6064875 Morgan May 2000 A
6070067 Nguyen et al. May 2000 A
6073004 Balachandran Jun 2000 A
6073015 Bergren Jun 2000 A
6081508 West et al. Jun 2000 A
6101378 Barabash et al. Aug 2000 A
6119014 Alperovich Sep 2000 A
6122503 Daly Sep 2000 A
6122520 Want et al. Sep 2000 A
6148197 Bridges et al. Nov 2000 A
6148198 Anderson et al. Nov 2000 A
6149353 Nilsson Nov 2000 A
6157831 Lamb Dec 2000 A
6167129 Fikis Dec 2000 A
6169891 Gorham et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173181 Losh Jan 2001 B1
6181703 Christie Jan 2001 B1
6181935 Gossman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188752 Lesley Feb 2001 B1
6192241 Yu Feb 2001 B1
6195543 Granberg Feb 2001 B1
6198431 Gibson Mar 2001 B1
6199045 Giniger et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205330 Winbladh Mar 2001 B1
6208854 Roberts et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219669 Haff Apr 2001 B1
6223046 Hamill-Keays et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226529 Bruno et al. May 2001 B1
6249680 Wax et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249744 Morita Jun 2001 B1
6266614 Alumbaugh Jul 2001 B1
6289373 Dezonno Sep 2001 B1
6301609 Aravamudan Oct 2001 B1
6317594 Gossman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324183 Miller Nov 2001 B1
6327350 Spangler Dec 2001 B1
6327479 Mikkola Dec 2001 B1
6335968 Malik Jan 2002 B1
6353621 Boland Mar 2002 B1
6356630 Cai Mar 2002 B1
6370242 Speers Apr 2002 B1
6373930 McConnell Apr 2002 B1
6381316 Joyce Apr 2002 B2
6381535 Durocher et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393269 Hartmaier May 2002 B1
6396913 Perkins, III May 2002 B1
6397055 Mchenry May 2002 B1
6397064 Bridges May 2002 B1
6421707 Miller Jul 2002 B1
6442257 Gundlach Aug 2002 B1
6456852 Bar Sep 2002 B2
6473622 Meuronen Oct 2002 B1
6480710 Laybourn Nov 2002 B1
6487180 Borgstahl Nov 2002 B1
6487602 Thakker Nov 2002 B1
6512930 Sandegren Jan 2003 B2
6526335 Treyz et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526351 Whitham Feb 2003 B2
6529593 Nelson Mar 2003 B2
6529732 Vainiomaki Mar 2003 B1
6587688 Chambers Jul 2003 B1
6609004 Morse Aug 2003 B1
6621810 Leung Sep 2003 B1
6639981 Dunn, Jr. Oct 2003 B1
6728353 Espejo Apr 2004 B1
6728635 Hamada Apr 2004 B2
6731943 McCormick May 2004 B1
6836477 West, Jr. Dec 2004 B1
6868074 Hanson Mar 2005 B1
6879835 Greene Apr 2005 B2
6940866 Miller Sep 2005 B1
6944184 Miller Sep 2005 B1
6954526 Glenn Oct 2005 B1
6985742 Giniger Jan 2006 B1
6987781 Miller Jan 2006 B1
6993325 Waesterlid Jan 2006 B1
7002988 Benedyk Feb 2006 B1
7020480 Coskun Mar 2006 B2
7050456 Sprague May 2006 B1
7058036 Yu Jun 2006 B1
7072665 Blumberg Jul 2006 B1
7110773 Wallace Sep 2006 B1
7120418 Herajarvi Oct 2006 B2
7127264 Hronek Oct 2006 B2
7130383 Naidoo et al. Oct 2006 B2
7145462 Dewing Dec 2006 B2
7180415 Bankert et al. Feb 2007 B2
7240108 Smith Jul 2007 B2
7245216 Burkley Jul 2007 B2
7317705 Hanson Jan 2008 B2
7386588 Mousseau Jun 2008 B2
7392038 Ratschunas Jun 2008 B1
7701925 Mason Apr 2010 B1
20010034224 McDowell Oct 2001 A1
20010040949 Blonder Nov 2001 A1
20010041579 Smith Nov 2001 A1
20020068548 Schroderus et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020093435 Baron Jul 2002 A1
20020098851 Walczak Jul 2002 A1
20020103762 Lopez Aug 2002 A1
20020116263 Gouge Aug 2002 A1
20020118800 Martinez Aug 2002 A1
20020119793 Hronek Aug 2002 A1
20020168986 Lau Nov 2002 A1
20020181681 Mani Dec 2002 A1
20020183072 Steinbach Dec 2002 A1
20030008661 Joyce Jan 2003 A1
20030017832 Anderson Jan 2003 A1
20030022664 Goldstein Jan 2003 A1
20030058096 Shteyn Mar 2003 A1
20030060212 Thomas Mar 2003 A1
20030086422 Klinker May 2003 A1
20030119525 Rajkotia Jun 2003 A1
20030120826 Shay Jun 2003 A1
20030155413 Kovesdi Aug 2003 A1
20030186709 Rhodes Oct 2003 A1
20040103431 Davenport May 2004 A1
20040199614 Shenfield Oct 2004 A1
20040203900 Cedervall Oct 2004 A1
20050004968 Mononen Jan 2005 A1
20050020287 Pohutsky Jan 2005 A1
20050048948 Holland Mar 2005 A1
20050064884 Dumont Mar 2005 A1
20050132060 Mo Jun 2005 A1
20050135569 Dickinson Jun 2005 A1
20050141522 Kadar Jun 2005 A1
20050149430 Williams Jul 2005 A1
20050250516 Shim Nov 2005 A1
20050277432 Viana Dec 2005 A1
20050282518 D'Evelyn Dec 2005 A1
20060036680 Shim Feb 2006 A1
20060058042 Shim Mar 2006 A1
20060058102 Nguyen Mar 2006 A1
20060079249 Shim Apr 2006 A1
20060109960 D'Evelyn May 2006 A1
20060116138 Simsek Jun 2006 A1
20060183460 Srinivasan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194595 Myllynen Aug 2006 A1
20060225090 Shim Oct 2006 A1
20060276168 Fuller Dec 2006 A1
20070037585 Shim Feb 2007 A1
20070072624 Niemenmaa Mar 2007 A1
20070082681 Kim Apr 2007 A1
20070082682 Kim Apr 2007 A1
20070110076 Brouwer May 2007 A1
20070117574 Watanabe May 2007 A1
20070117577 Harris May 2007 A1
20070149208 Syrbe Jun 2007 A1
20070167177 Kraufvelin Jul 2007 A1
20070182547 Wachter Aug 2007 A1
20070243885 Shim Oct 2007 A1
20080109650 Shim May 2008 A1
20090221263 Titus Sep 2009 A1
20100076767 Vieri Mar 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
WO0028746 May 2000 FI
2308528 Dec 1995 GB
WO2006075856 Jul 2006 KR
WO9856160 May 1998 SE
WO9960801 May 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
The Power of Mobile Unified Messaging: Siemans and Comverse to Demonstrate WAP-Based Messaging Applications on Live GPRS System, Comverse, Feb. 2000.
Bond, “Cellular Carriers Use Prepaid Programs to Reach Untapped Markets,” Billing World, Mar. 1997, pp. 14-17.
Freedom Wireless, “The Freedom to Chose! Get Pre-Pay Cellular,” sales pamphlet, undated.
MultiMedia Publishing Corp., “Prepaid Cellular and Prepaid Wireless Market Report and Forecast 1997-2002,” sales literature, undated.
NEXTLINK, “Introducing a New Prepaid Telephone Service from NEXTLINK,” sales literature, undated.
Open Development Corp., “openMedia Cellular Prepaid,” sales literature, undated.
Tecore, Inc., “Pre-Paid Cellular,” sales literature, Mar. 25 1997, pp. 1-4.
McDowell et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/178,142, filed Jan. 26, 2000.
Thomas, U.S. Appl. No. 60/185,480, filed Feb. 28, 2000.
Day et al., RFC 2778, dated Feb. 2000.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150358939 A1 Dec 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60196104 Apr 2000 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12929729 Feb 2011 US
Child 14828844 US
Parent 11490108 Jul 2006 US
Child 12929729 US
Parent 09576022 May 2000 US
Child 11490108 US