1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to water aeration devices, and particularly to a mobile buoyant aerator adapted to float freely in a body of water and to aerate at least the upper strata of the water.
2. Description of the Related Art
The contamination of various bodies of water by various means is an increasingly serious problem worldwide. Perhaps the most widespread contaminants are organic materials that enter the water system due to pollution from human habitation, either directly or indirectly, e.g., pollution from farms and the like. Such pollution can affect inland fresh water supplies (lakes and rivers), and can also be carried to the sea by inland rivers and waterways or by direct discharge of sewage and/or other pollutants into the sea. Organic material in the sewage of treatment plants is another example of such pollution, albeit contained for processing. The biochemical processes that occur in water due to such organic pollution are known to decrease the oxygen content of the water, thereby reducing or perhaps even destroying fish and other aquatic life in the contaminated body of water. Even if some fish remain in the polluted water, they are almost certainly unfit for human consumption, if caught.
It is generally considered that the most effective means of eliminating such pollutants in contaminated water is by bacteriological processing, wherein bacteria process the contaminants to break them down into harmless organic materials. However, such bacteria are aerobic, i.e., they require oxygen for their metabolism. This is well known in the sewage treatment field, where water is commonly treated by aeration after solids are removed by settling or other means. Such aeration is generally accomplished by pneumatic means, e.g., pumping the water up for dispensing into the air from spray booms and nozzles, or by forcing air through underwater pipes for the air to bubble up through the water. Such pneumatic systems are relatively costly to operate and require relatively high energy and manpower costs. Even if such systems were less costly to operate, a huge drawback is that they cannot be readily transported to a pollution site for operation at that site. Rather, the water must be transported to the location of the aeration system, a process that is clearly unworkable on a very large scale and/or over very long distances.
Another principle of aerator operation uses mechanical motion to drive a propeller or the like to disturb the surface of the water and entrain air into the water. The pneumatic system described above and such mechanical systems are by far the most common water aeration systems in use, and neither is particularly efficient or economical due to the relatively high labor required for their deployment, operation, and maintenance.
Thus, a mobile buoyant aerator solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
The mobile buoyant aerator is an aerator provided with flotation and independent motion. The aerator has a toroidal contaminant capture tray and a tube extending downward therethrough. Various embodiments may incorporate a source of compressed air or other gas or a motorized pump to deliver the air or gas. Each of the embodiments is equipped with some form of propulsion to provide at least limited mobility. Navigation may be provided by conventional means, e.g., remote control, global positioning system and autonomous control, etc.
In a first embodiment, the aerator has two concentric central tubes and a tank of compressed air or other gas installed atop the smaller diameter central tube. Air is released from the compressed air tank to travel down the smaller diameter tube, where it enters the lower portion of the larger diameter surrounding tube and bubbles up through the tube, entraining contaminants as it does so. The contaminated and aerated water then flows into the toroidal capture tray, where the contaminants are captured. A filter may be provided across the top of the capture tray. The water flows through a drain in the bottom of the tray for further treatment or return to the ambient supply, as appropriate. A second embodiment is similar to the first embodiment, but the compressed gas tank is placed at the bottom of the return tube, where the gas is released directly into the return tube. This embodiment does not require the smaller diameter down tube in the center of the larger tube.
A third embodiment incorporates a water pump at the top of the device. The pump draws water from a supply tube extending beyond the toroidal capture tray and pumps the water down through a smaller diameter central tube to entrain contaminated water as it travels up through the larger diameter tube. A fourth embodiment comprises an air pump disposed at the top of the device, pumping air down through the smaller diameter central tube to entrain water and bubble back up through the larger diameter surrounding tube. Any of the embodiments may incorporate a skimming device at the top of the larger diameter tube, i.e., in the center of the toroidal tray, to skim off contaminants as they rise to the top of the tube if the force of the upward rising water and entrained air and contaminants is not sufficient to force the contaminants from the top of the tube and into the capture tray and its filter, if so equipped.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
The mobile buoyant aerator is a free floating device for deployment in a body of water for removal of contaminants therefrom and/or for aerating the water to facilitate the breakdown of organic contaminants therein. The mobile buoyant aerator uses compressed air or other gas delivered from above or below the unit, or air or water pumped through the unit by an onboard pump.
A fluid delivery device comprising a gas delivery tube 26 and container of compressed air 28 is installed with the aerator 10. The gas delivery tube 26 is installed concentrically through the fluid entrainment tube 20. The lower end 30 (shown in
The mobile buoyant aerator 10 is placed at the desired location in the water, and the container or tank 28 of compressed air or gas is opened to the upper end 32 of the gas delivery tube 26 to allow the air or gas to flow downward through the tube 26. The compressed air or gas flows outward from the lower end 30 of the gas delivery tube 26. The lighter gas bubbles upward within the hollow fluid entrainment tube 20 and entrains water therewith. The mixture of gas and entrained water bubbles from the open upper end 22 of the entrainment tube 20, whereupon it flows outward into the contaminant capture tray 12.
In certain situations, there may be minimal upward force for the water and gas mixture as it travels through the entrainment tube 20. Foreign matter and/or contaminants may tend to collect at the upper end of the entrainment tube, rather than flowing outward therefrom and into the capture tray 12. Accordingly, a rotary skimmer 34 may be installed at the upper end 22 of the entrainment tube 20 to skim any foreign matter and/or contaminants from the upwelling water and gas mix as it reaches the upper end of the entrainment tube 20. The skimmer 34 may be rotated by the force of the upwelling water and gas as it reaches the upper end 22 of the entrainment tube 20, or by other conventional means. The skimmer 34 is not shown in other embodiments of the mobile buoyant aerator, but it will be noted that it may be installed with other embodiments.
The water and gas mixture, along with any contaminants contained therewith, flows outward from the upper end 22 of the entrainment tube 20 and into the contaminant capture tray 12. A screen or filter 36 may be installed across the top of the tray 12 between the outer wall 16 and the upper end 22 of the entrainment tube 12, i.e., the upper edge of the inner wall 18 of the tray 12. (The screen or filter 36 is illustrated as having a relatively coarse mesh in
All of the embodiments of the mobile buoyant aerator are configured as free floating, independent units that may be operated free of any anchoring or restraint devices. Accordingly, they may include a propulsion and guidance system for positioning. The mobile buoyant aerator 10 of
The mobile buoyant aerator 110 embodiment of
Operation of the mobile buoyant aerator 110 is substantially as described above for the aerator 10 of
However, rather than using a source of compressed air or gas as the working fluid, the mobile buoyant aerator 210 of
Operation of the mobile buoyant aerator 210 is similar to the operation of the aerators 10 and 110 of
The mobile buoyant aerator 310 of
Operation of the mobile buoyant aerator 310 is similar to that described further above for the aerator 10 of
Accordingly, the various embodiments of the mobile buoyant aerator provide for the decontamination of bodies of water by removing contaminants therefrom and/or aerating the water to allow aerobic bacteria to process organic material in the water. Either or both functions may be achieved simultaneously, depending upon the quality of the water being treated and/or the specific embodiment of the mobile buoyant aerator. The versatility of the aerator, which is capable of automatic and autonomous operation, greatly reduces the need for human oversight and supervision, thereby freeing personnel to carry out other chores and activities as the water decontamination and purification process is achieved.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2271446 | Unger, Jr. | Jan 1942 | A |
2695710 | Gibbs | Nov 1954 | A |
3147217 | Halton | Sep 1964 | A |
3416729 | Ravitts | Dec 1968 | A |
3496901 | Neighbors et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3572658 | Ravitts | Mar 1971 | A |
3653641 | Eron | Apr 1972 | A |
3669422 | Nogaj | Jun 1972 | A |
3722687 | Stebbins | Mar 1973 | A |
3758276 | Bond et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3802673 | Ross | Apr 1974 | A |
3843520 | Bottorf | Oct 1974 | A |
3936381 | Pacaud | Feb 1976 | A |
4268398 | Shuck | May 1981 | A |
4431531 | Hollingsworth | Feb 1984 | A |
4485013 | Cockman | Nov 1984 | A |
4680148 | Arbisi | Jul 1987 | A |
4681711 | Eaton | Jul 1987 | A |
4690756 | Van Ry | Sep 1987 | A |
4707308 | Ryall | Nov 1987 | A |
4734235 | Holyoak | Mar 1988 | A |
4746424 | Drew | May 1988 | A |
4834872 | Overath | May 1989 | A |
5071550 | Bernhardt | Dec 1991 | A |
5133854 | Horvath | Jul 1992 | A |
5139659 | Scott | Aug 1992 | A |
5234112 | Valenzuela | Aug 1993 | A |
5242600 | Meylor et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5326475 | Kent | Jul 1994 | A |
5868091 | Gross | Feb 1999 | A |
5980100 | Haegeman | Nov 1999 | A |
6260716 | Fontaine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6311632 | Noel, Jr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6719911 | Bourke | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7022223 | Lovestead | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7121536 | Ruzicka | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7267328 | Witheridge | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7427221 | Blumenthal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7520493 | Haldane | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7575226 | Reusche | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581716 | Tsai | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7686951 | Wagner | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8191869 | Galletta, Jr. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8413966 | Al-Anzi | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20060076283 | Tsai | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060283805 | Schreppel, Jr. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080210643 | Bradley | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100170450 | Bradley | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120228216 | Gavrieli | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130187297 | Al-Anzi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9109193 | Jun 1991 | AU |
WO 2007121509 | Nov 2007 | AU |
Entry |
---|
Nielsen et al. “A comparison of sampling mechanisms available for small-diameter ground water monitoring wells” published in the spring of 1985. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140110323 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |