This invention relates to systems and methods for delivering mobile content over a wireless communications network.
Traditionally, the majority of data messages have been sent across radio networks in real-time when the user requests them. This common practice of “Deliver NOW” is utilized extensively in the growing area of text-based message or voice services of cellular networks. The delivery of data in real-time ignores the fact that wireless network data traffic is unevenly distributed. The maximum network capacity is dimensioned to match the network load peaks, thus leaving a lot of unused capacity in the network. Typically, in a twenty-four hour day cycle (except for a few traffic peaks during office hours), more than half of the network capacity is unused.
Typical message delivery systems on wireless networks have sustained themselves due to strict adherence to a small file size requirement. The cost of a wireless network delivering larger file size content such as a video clip or an image file on demand would be prohibitively expensive, as well as time-consuming, to the end-user. Many current wireless network delivery systems have addressed the problem by adding additional network base stations and fine tuning coding techniques. These methods only lead to additional capacity without reducing the cost to send the actual data over the wireless network. If the sending device tries to send a message and the recipient is not available (e.g. terminal is turned off) the service center continues to send messages so long it can reach the recipient device (the amount of time the service center attempts to send the message can be limited to a pre-determined time window).
Therefore, there exists a need for a system and method whereby a user could specify, using his or her wireless terminal device, whether a message is to be delivered in real-time which will prevent the system from managing present network load conditions while the message is being delivered, or to be time delayed to suit the existing demands on the wireless network.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention there is provided a system and method whereby a user who has requested content selects a class of delivery for the content from his or her wireless terminal device, such as a cellular phone. The class of delivery of message content can be selected by the user on a transaction basis, or subscription-based and pre-defined in a user profile. The content is delivered as a message, which is preferably comprised of three parts: a message header (e.g. the source and destination address, the identity and type of message, etc.); a message body, which is essentially the content; and a delivery class field, identifying the class the user selected to deliver the message content. The user can preferably select from at least two delivery classes: “deliver NOW” in real-time; or a specified “time delay delivery”. A “time delay delivery” is referring to a pre-determined time window to deliver content, and can be further divided into classes based on the defined delay. The “time delay delivery” class allows the wireless network to send the content at a time when the network is least utilized.
In the preferred embodiment, a user's content request is sent to a Content/Service Provider which creates a content delivery message with the requested information including the content and delivery class. The Content/Service Provider relays the message to a Messaging Transport System (MTS) in charge of delivering the message to the user, or directly to the Mobile Content Delivery (MCD) system. The selected MCD System acts as the scheduled delivery engine that calculates the pre-determined time window the content delivery message is to be sent by notifying the Messaging Transport System. The time window of delivery is calculated preferably taking into account such information as the delivery class, the wireless device location in the radio network, the wireless network usage and relative capacity (actual and historical), and the size of the content that can be delivered in the pre-determined time window. A short period before the content delivery message is to be delivered, the wireless device location is determined, the actual network load condition at the wireless device is determined and compared to the historical information (the “load curve”). If conditions are right, the message is sent to the end-user's wireless device via the cellular network.
The present invention will introduce a mechanism that allows operators to provide new data services (especially high-volume content) cheaper without sacrificing their high-margin business, thus enabling more services, as well as attracting more users. The present invention further allows data traffic on a wireless network to be more evenly distributed over a twenty-four hour day cycle, thus actually increasing the total network throughput, without having to upgrade the wireless network components. The present invention will provide users with new services at a reduced price, directly to their wireless device.
Other and further aspects of the present invention will become apparent during the course of the following description and by reference to the attached drawings.
The MTS 12 transmits the message to a Mobile Content Delivery (MCD) system 11 describing an embodiment of the present invention. The MCD system 11 schedules a delivery time window of the content by analyzing the delivery class, wireless device location, existing network activity loading and the content size while taking into account the agreed upon user maximum delivery time. The MCD system 11 is provided with delivery time window flexibility provided the end-user did not select “Deliver NOW” as the delivery class. The MCD system 11 also preferably tracks previous message deliveries in order to properly predict and schedule future message deliveries at a more cost-effective network activity time window without surpassing the agreed upon user maximum delivery time. The Mobile Content Delivery system 11 will be discussed in detail hereinafter in connection with
Moments before the pre-determined time window of delivery, MCD system 11 returns the message content to the MTS 12. The MTS 12 relays a “Wake-Up” message to the Short Message System (SMS) 10, or an equivalent service center, which in-turn sends a “Wake-Up” message to the wireless terminal device 30. The Short Message System 10 generates a short message and attaches a Quality of Service (QoS) parameter which adjusts the speed of delivery of content through the network. The SMS 10, like the MTS 12, is a well-known component of the wireless network. Once the scheduled delivery time window has arrived, the content is delivered to the end-user at the wireless terminal device 30. In traditional cellular networks using less advanced terminal devices the content is fetched by the terminal device 30 using information in the “Wake-Up” message, in advanced networks the content is pushed to the wireless terminal device from the network, in this embodiment by the MTS 12.
The end-user locates content he wishes to receive via a browsing screen 31 on his wireless terminal device 30. On the screen, the end-user selects the content and the desired class of delivery. In this example implementation the user selects a delivery class from three delivery classes: “Deliver Now”, for time critical data; “Specified Time Delay” delivery, for less critical data; or, “Overnight Delivery”, which is the least expensive option. Alternatively, his delivery class may also be selected automatically as described earlier. (Note: Three classes of time delivery are shown for illustrative purposes only, the MCD system allows for numerous delivery classes and corresponding prices, set by the operator.) The user browsing session goes over the wireless network via Base Station System 32, which in turn relays it to the Content/Service Provider 13 through a Layer 7 Switch 35 connection to a data network such as the Internet, Extranet, Intranet, LAN, or alternate networks. The Layer 7 switch 35 monitors messages for preset parameters to determine scheduled delivery.
The Content/Service Provider 13 creates a message based on receipt from the wireless terminal of addressing information such as: IP address or mobile phone number, default message server address, content request ID, and the class of delivery, which it then routes to the Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 of the selected MCD system 11 via the Layer 7 switch 35. Depending on network data activity, the Layer 7 switch 35 may re-direct the message content to another MCD system 11 with a lighter network server data activity load. Alternatively, if the chosen transport mechanism (in this example implemenation the MTS 12) supports usage of delivery class parameters, the Layer 7 switch 35 may re-direct the message content to a different MTS 12, which communicates with the MCD system 11.
The Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 fetches wireless network activity updates and current cell user location from Cellular Network 51 which it uses to schedule a time window to send the message to the wireless terminal device 30 based on the specified class of delivery, the user handset location, network capacity usage, and file size of the content. Once the pre-determined delivery time window has arrived, the selected Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 sends the re-directed message content to MTS 12 (reference
In parallel with the content queuing activity, the Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 queries Cellular Network 51 in real time for the cell ID corresponding to the cell in which the wireless terminal device 30 is currently located at Block 56. Cell activity records are maintained in server database 57. The Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 uses these records as well as on-line queries in determining the cell's capacity and usage in block 58. Off-line file transfer regarding cell activity records can be gathered to server database 57 from the cellular network 51. On-line queries regarding cell activity can be done from the cellular network 51 at block 58. At decision block 60, the Message Buffering and Scheduling Engine 36 assesses past and present cell capacity, current user location, content file size, and time remaining to deliver content. If the decision block 60 determines that this is not an appropriate time window to deliver the message content, the queue priority of the message is adjusted based on the absolute time remaining to deliver the message content while taking into account the time lapsed to reach the “NO SEND” decision. However, if decision block 60 determines that this an appropriate time window to deliver message content based on the aforementioned factors, the Layer 7 switch 35 will designate a Delivery Server 33 selecting from a group of servers available to deliver the message content at Block 61. At Block 62, Deliver Server 33 delivers message content 50 to the wireless terminal device 30. Many plausible variations of
Finally, the third spectrum of content which demands the most network bandwidth, is graphics-rich browsing and real-time video files. In the absence of the present invention, the service operator could only charge a fraction per MB relative to what it could charge for messaging/voice services. Delivering this type of large file size message content in the “Deliver NOW” region would be cost prohibitive. The present invention allows large file content messages to be time-delay delivered at a pre-determined time window, taking advantage of low-load “time windows” in the network traffic loading profiles. The Overnight Delivery (e.g., selecting a time window within 24 hours) option could result in a cost factor reduction to 2.5% of X relative to the “Deliver Now” region. The significant reduction in cost to deliver high bandwidth content to the end-user will make delivering mobile services such as graphics-rich browsing and real-time video economically feasible. The three time delivery regions shown in
Ramifications and Scope:
Although the description above contains many specifics, these are merely provided to illustrate the invention and should not be construed as limitations of the invention's scope. Thus, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the system and processes of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention cover its modifications and variations provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. In this context, “equivalents” means each and every implementation for carrying out the functions in the claims, even if not explicitly described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/944,443 filed Aug. 31, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,996,393 and entitled “Mobile Content Delivery System”, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5216515 | Steele et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5463620 | Sriram | Oct 1995 | A |
5491820 | Belove et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5635918 | Tett | Jun 1997 | A |
5708960 | Kamisaka et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5926624 | Katz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928331 | Bushmitch | Jul 1999 | A |
6052730 | Felciano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055570 | Nielsen | Apr 2000 | A |
6061718 | Nelson | May 2000 | A |
6081518 | Bowman-Amuah | Jun 2000 | A |
6147975 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2000 | A |
6199096 | Mirashrafi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211869 | Loveman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226523 | Karlsson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236991 | Frauenhofer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6366947 | Kavner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381637 | Kamada | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421717 | Kloba et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449448 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6493758 | McLain | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505242 | Holland et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6556997 | Levy | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6591288 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20010003828 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007105 | Brotz et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010036224 | Demello et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010758 | Chan | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020103922 | Arend et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107985 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111855 | Hammerstad | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020151294 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161633 | Jacob et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016656 | Schwartz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040253945 | Janik | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050107031 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050273514 | Milkey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0849920 | Jun 1998 | EP |
1077557 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2001337882 | Dec 2001 | JP |
WO 0056088 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0057610 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0064203 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0128171 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0133781 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133782 | May 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060073810 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09944443 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 11285573 | US |