This device relates to mobile loading docks and more particularly to a loading dock with side extensions for easier loading and unloading of large products.
A variety of loading docks have been devised to adjust to the height of different trailers to properly match the height of the dock to the deck of the trailer. By aligning the height of the trailer and the dock the loading and unloading of cargo is facilitated.
There are many such devices in the prior art. One such device is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,624,446 to Gould which discloses a reinforced platform pivotally mounted to the ground at one end and includes a support assembly having hydraulic cylinders. In operation the rear wheels of a truck trailer are backed onto the platform and then the non-mounted end of the platform is lifted by the hydraulic cylinders until the deck of the trailer is equal to the height of the dock. A similar device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,765,792 to Cherry et al. which also discloses a pivotally-mounted and hydraulically-raised platform.
Loading docks of the prior art typically have certain disadvantages. Most moveable loading docks are not very wide and this can pose problems when loading very large containers onto flatbed trucks or trailers. One problem is that if a trailer isn't backed up and aligned very closely and accurately with a loading dock, a fork truck or similar loading vehicle will have a difficult time loading containers into a tight space such as a trailer. Other moveable loading docks of the prior art which are wide are very difficult to ship because special Department of Transportation permits are required for shipping items over 102 inches wide.
It would be desirable to have a mobile loading dock which is secure and safe and which breaks down to under 102 inches wide for easy shipping yet when fully-assembled is large enough for fork trucks and similar vehicles to easily load product into trailers or onto flatbeds.
This device overcomes certain problems and shortcomings in the prior art, including those mentioned above and others, and provides advantages for a mobile loading dock not previously provided.
This device is an improvement in a mobile loading dock apparatus of the type including a main member having a substantially flat upper ramp surface extending from an upper end for abutting the bed of a truck to a lower ground-adjacent end and opposed lateral edges. It is highly preferable that the lateral edges include a pair of removable side extension-barrier members each having a bracket removably secured with respect to one of the opposed lateral edges and having an upper flat surface substantially coplanar with and widening the flat upper ramp surface, and an upwardly-extending barrier portion offset from the upper ramp surface. Preferably, the upwardly-extending barrier portion is a handrail.
It is highly preferred that the bracket include an interlocking portion extending below the flat upper ramp surface for engagement with respect to the main member. Highly preferred embodiments include a bracket-engaging member along each of the opposed lateral edges and adapted to receive the interlocking portion. Preferably, the interlocking portion includes at least one protrusion and the bracket-engaging member includes at least one upwardly facing groove configured for engagement with the at least one protrusion.
It is also preferable that the bracket-engaging member is a unitary piece welded on each of the opposed lateral edges and including an angled guide plate to guide the side extension-barrier members into the bracket-engaging member. In some preferred embodiments, at least one securing bolt is used as a securement device for the bracket and bracket-engaging member
In highly preferred embodiments, the side extension-barrier members are on the upper end of the ramp member. In other highly preferred embodiments, the side extension-barrier members extend along the entire length of the main member and are each a separate section nesting near or against a neighboring side extension-barrier member.
It is preferable that the ramp member include a first upper-end planar portion, the plane of which is parallel to a ground surface on which the ramp member rests; and a second planar portion, the plane of which is downwardly-angled from the upper end to the lower edge. Some embodiments also include a hand-rail secured to the first upper-end planar portion or along the length of the ramp.
Some embodiments include a wheel assembly on the ramp underside with a hydraulic check valve for automatic locking of the wheel assembly into a mobile position when the wheel assembly is erected. The wheel assembly also preferably includes a manually-actuated hydraulic release valve. Actuation of the release valve while in a mobile position causes the pushing force to be reduced and the wheel assembly to return to a resting position.
It is preferred that the wheel assembly also include an elongate weight-bearing support member having a first end attached to the ramp underside and a second end attached to a tension spring and having a foot. The foot contacts the ground surface when the wheel assembly is in the resting position. When in the resting position, the support member bears a portion of the weight of the ramp member.
It is highly preferred that the ramp member include two wheel assemblies, one on each side of the ramp. The wheel assemblies are equally distant from a point on the lower edge and are located on each side of ramp member to provide stability.
The drawings illustrate a preferred embodiment including the above-noted characteristics and features of the device. The device will be readily understood from the descriptions and drawings. In the drawings:
As seen in
Removal of side extensions 24 for shipping is important since the maximum width across currently allowed by the Department of Transportation by road and without special oversized load permits is 102 inches or less. Ramp 10 in some embodiments is 97 inches wide when side extensions 24 are removed. When side extensions 24 are placed onto each side of ramp 10, the upper ramp surface 14 for fork truck 44 to drive on is increased to at least 108 inches wide and in some embodiments even wider.
Bracket-engaging member 34 in some embodiments is a unitary piece (although it can also be several pieces) welded on each of the opposed lateral edges 22 and including an angled guide plate 40 to guide side extension-barrier members 24 into the bracket-engaging member 34 this is seen best in
Side extension-barrier members 24 can be located on upper end 16 of ramp member 10 as seen in
In some embodiments, ramp 10 includes a first upper-end planar portion, the plane of which is parallel to a ground surface on which ramp 10 rests; and a second planar portion, the plane of which is downwardly-angled from upper end 16 to lower end 20.
Some embodiments include a wheel assembly (not shown) on the ramp underside with a hydraulic check valve for automatic locking of the wheel assembly into a mobile position when the wheel assembly is erected. The wheel assembly also preferably includes a manually-actuated hydraulic release valve. Actuation of the release valve while in a mobile position causes the pushing force to be reduced and the wheel assembly to return to a resting position.
It is preferred that the wheel assembly also include an elongate weight-bearing support member (not shown) having a first end attached to the ramp underside and a second end attached to a tension spring and having a foot. The foot contacts the ground surface when the wheel assembly is in the resting position. When in the resting position, the support member bears a portion of the weight of the ramp member.
It is highly preferred that the ramp member include two wheel assemblies (not shown), one on each side of the ramp. The wheel assemblies are equally distant from a point on the lower edge and are located on each side of ramp member to provide stability
In other embodiments, ramp 10 includes a lower end 20 with a slot 54 as seen in
A wide variety of materials are available for the various parts discussed and illustrated herein. Although the device has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2547956 | McDonald | Apr 1951 | A |
2739325 | Grace | Mar 1956 | A |
2924427 | Larson | Feb 1960 | A |
3024870 | Kramcsak et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3061125 | Noland | Oct 1962 | A |
3548433 | Miles et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3635492 | Mauldin | Jan 1972 | A |
3802018 | Miles et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4201157 | Lambert | May 1980 | A |
4270630 | Karkau | Jun 1981 | A |
4453282 | Larsen | Jun 1984 | A |
4624446 | Gould | Nov 1986 | A |
4765792 | Cherry et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
5065468 | Sherrod | Nov 1991 | A |
5306112 | Kielinski | Apr 1994 | A |
5311628 | Springer et al. | May 1994 | A |
5445352 | Long | Aug 1995 | A |
5845356 | Kielinski | Dec 1998 | A |
6164415 | Takeuchi | Dec 2000 | A |
6241450 | Gehman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6745422 | Emerson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6898815 | Young et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6931686 | Hoofard et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7013519 | Gleason | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7062813 | Hoofard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069611 | Larson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7216392 | Hoofard et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7310843 | Mitchell | Dec 2007 | B1 |
8832890 | Loftis et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020170785 | Stockmann | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192061 | Brehmer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040250360 | Young et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060081756 | Hallett | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082079 | Eichhorn et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070025831 | Burt et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090236578 | Nirenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090300860 | Campbell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120048653 | Matthews et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120121369 | Ablabutyan | May 2012 | A1 |
20120237331 | Gabrielson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130092890 | Alanko | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130198978 | Pohlman et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140109944 | Triolo | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150197220 | Lusty et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160311376 | Dokter | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203 729 856 | Jul 2014 | CN |
19 46 083 | Mar 1971 | DE |
196 30 359 | Jan 1998 | DE |
2 547 566 | Dec 1984 | FR |
2 777 342 | Oct 1999 | FR |
Entry |
---|
English language machine translation of Abstract, CN 203 729 856, Lu, Jul. 23, 2014. |
English language machine translation of Abstract, DE 19 46 083, Klink, Mar. 18, 1971. |
English language machine translation of Abstract, DE 196 30 359, Blomenroehr Fahrzeugbau GmbH, Jan. 29, 1998. |
English language machine translation of Abstract, FR 2 547 566, Crepin, Dec. 21, 1984. |
English language machine translation of Abstract, FR 2 777 342, Philippeau, Oct. 15, 1999. |
Amitengineering. Movable Dock Ramp. YouTube, published on Nov. 2, 2012; Retrieved form the Internet on May 9, 2014, URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPPd90-8a1g. |
Leumengineering. Mobile Loading Dock—How It Works. YouTube, published on Jun. 14, 2013; Retrieved from the Internet on May 9, 2014, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyvwWLhSQqo. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170129723 A1 | May 2017 | US |