The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for electronic signatures and, more particularly, to methods and systems to facilitate signer-initiated electronic document signing using a mobile or other client device, such as by capturing an image of a document with a camera of the mobile device, and then importing the image as an electronic signature document into an electronic signature service for signature and storage.
One existing approach to electronic signatures provides an electronic signature “stamping” application for a mobile device. The signature application allows a user to open a document sent to them for signing and “stamp” a signature or other data into the document and return this by email. This approach suffers from a number of drawbacks. As one example, it only works with specific software applications for mobile devices, and the signing process is performed entirely in software on the mobile device. As such, the document must be manually moved from the email message into the device, manipulated, and then returned back to the device for email delivery.
Also, to produce such an application for multiple devices or platforms requires that a largely redundant application be built for every platform, and then only for those platforms that have enough capability to actually manipulate PDFs. Not all platforms or devices can actually handle tasks like conversion of files, presentation of files, managing signature capture and placement and security. The inability of mobile devices to universally perform all such required functions severely limits the expansion of electronic signature services, particularly in the mobile device context.
Furthermore, such an application does not handle the case where a user receives a hard copy of a document. For example, if a user receives a paper copy of an agreement, there is no convenient way for the user to import that document into his mobile device and attach an electronic signature. The inability for mobile devices to handle physical documents further limits the expansion of electronic signature services.
Preferred and alternative examples of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
Embodiments described herein provide enhanced computer- and network-based methods and systems for mobile and other client devices to facilitate electronic document signing. Example embodiments provide an electronic signature service (“ESS”) configured to facilitate the creation, storage, and management of documents and corresponding electronic signatures. Using at least some of the techniques described herein, a user (a “signer”) can efficiently import a paper signature document into the ESS with a client device that has or is communicatively coupled to a camera or other image capture device (e.g., a scanner). First, the signer captures an image (e.g., taking a picture or photo) of the paper signature document. Then, using a browser or other client module executing on the client device, the signer can import the captured image into the ESS. The signer can further access, review, and sign the document via the mobile device, either before or after the document is imported into the ESS. After signing the document, the signer can use the client device to cause the ESS to provide access to the signed document to a recipient, such as by causing the ESS to email or otherwise transmit the signed document to the recipient.
In the illustrated scenario, the sender 10 transmits a document (e.g., a contract or agreement) to the signer 11, where it is received as paper document 19. Transmitting the document may include sending the document through the mail or courier service. In other embodiments, the document may be transmitted at least in part in electronic form, such as by transmitting the document via a facsimile machine/network (not shown) to the signer 11, where it is reproduced as the paper document 19. As another example, the sender 10 may utilize a sender client device 160 to send an email with the document included as an attachment to the email. The transmitted document may be in any format, such as PDF, Microsoft Word, HTML, text, or the like. Upon receipt of the email or electronic transmission, the signer 11 or some other party then prints the transmitted document as paper document 19.
The signer 11 may then use the signer client device 161 to import the document into the ESS 110. In the illustrated embodiment, the signer client device 161 includes a camera 162 and client logic 163 (e.g., a Web browser, email reader, a plug in, a mobile application). In other embodiments, the signer client device 161 is communicatively coupled to a separate camera or other input device (e.g., a scanner) operable to capture an image of the paper document 19. The signer 11 causes the client logic 163 to direct the camera 162 to capture an image of the paper document 19. The captured document image data is then stored or buffered in the signer client device 161 as a bit map, a compressed image (e.g., JPEG, GIF), PDF file, or the like. The signer 11 can then review the captured document image data (e.g., to determine image quality), modify the image data (e.g., by adding additional pages of the paper document 19 captured by the camera 162, by adding signature data), or the like.
When the user is satisfied that the paper document 19 has been successfully captured by the camera 162, the user causes the client logic 163 to import the document image data captured by the camera 162 to the ESS 110, where it is securely stored as electronic document 20. The ESS 110 may also convert the imported image data into a standard or preferred format for storage within the ESS 110. For example, if the captured image data was transmitted to the ESS 110 as a bit map or other image file, the data may be converted to or embedded within a PDF file by the ESS 110.
Once the document image data is imported into the ESS 110 and securely stored as document 20, the signer 11 can use the client device 161 to interact with the ESS 110 and perform various electronic signature-related operations. For example, the signer 11 can access and review the document by presenting and browsing the document using the logic 163, a browser, or some other client logic executing on the client device 161. Once the signer 11 has reviewed and/or modified the document to his satisfaction, he can provide signature data which is then securely stored by the ESS 110 as signature data 21 in association with the document 20. Note that in some embodiments, the signer 11 can provide signature data at an earlier time, such as after the document 19 has been captured by the camera 162, but before the captured image data is imported into the ESS 110. In such cases, the signature data may be transmitted from the signer client device 161 during (or at about the same time as) the import of the document image data into the ESS 110.
Once the signer 11 has signed the document 20, the signer 11 can cause the ESS 110 to provide access to the signed document 20 a recipient. For example, the signer 11 may return the signed document to the sender 10 or some other recipient. Different approaches to providing access to signed documents are contemplated. In the illustrated embodiment, the signer 11 can cause the ESS 110 to notify the sender 10, such as by causing the ESS 110 to transmit (e.g., in an email) a URL, link, or other identifier of the document 20 to the sender client device 160. The sender 10 can then use a browser or other client logic executing on the sender client device 160 to access the signed document on the ESS 110. Such an approach may be advantageous for sensitive documents which may preferably not be transmitted within an email or via some other possibly insecure transmission facility. In other embodiments, the ESS 110 can transmit the signed document 20 via an email, fax, or other transmission mechanism.
Note that the scenario described with respect to
Note also that at least some of the described techniques may be employed in a context where the client device does not include or otherwise use a camera. For example, the sender 10 may use the sender client device 160 to transmit a signature document (e.g., a contract or agreement) to the signer client device 161. For example, the sender 10 may transmit an email that includes a signature document (e.g., as an attachment or in the body of the email itself). Then, the signer 11 may use the logic 163 on the signer client device 161 to import the received signature document into the ESS 110 for secure storage and signature. In an email-based embodiment, the logic 163 may be or include a plug-in or extension to an email client or other type of email reader. As another example, the signer 11 may initially receive a signature document from a Web site, such as while accessing a Web site that originates or otherwise facilitates bank loans, credit card accounts, or the like. Upon receiving the document (e.g., in a Web browser of the signer client device 161), the signer 11 may use the logic 163 to import the document into the ESS 110 for secure storage and signature. In such an embodiment, the logic 163 may be or include a plug-in executing in the context of a Web browser.
The ESS 110 may provide other or additional functions. For example, the ESS 110 may provide or facilitate intelligent form-filling operations. In one embodiment, when the signer 11 repeatedly uses the ESS 110 to electronically sign documents, the ESS 110 tracks form data (e.g., names, addresses, telephone numbers) provided by the signer 11, such that forms within signature documents can be automatically populated with data elements, thereby increasing the efficiency of the signature process.
In some embodiments, the ESS 110 provides electronic identification (“ID”) cards that represent user identities. An ID can include or operate as a container for information about a corresponding user, including personal information (e.g., name, address), a signature, security settings (e.g., regarding sharing of personal information). In some cases, the ESS 110 facilitates the creation of an ID for a user based on authentication information or credentials related to a social network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) or other system (e.g., public email system). For example, the user may use credentials for his account on a social network (e.g., username and password) to establish an ID card managed by the ESS 110, thereby eliminating the need to create yet another set of credentials that are specific to the ESS 110.
Typically, the signer client device 161 is a mobile device, such as a smart phone, tablet computer, personal digital assistant, or the like. However, the techniques may be equally applied in other contexts and/or to other types of computing devices, including desktop computers, kiosk systems, and the like. In particular, some embodiments provide a module (e.g., plug-in, widget, extension) configured to perform some of the described techniques in the context of a desktop email client (e.g., Outlook), a hosted email service (e.g., Google Mail, Yahoo! Mail, Hotmail), or other application. In addition, the techniques may generally be deployed (e.g., as a signature module) in the context of any Web-based information or e-commerce service that has a need to obtain an electronic signature from a user (e.g., to obtain assent to terms and conditions, to enter into purchase/sale agreements, etc.).
In some embodiments, all or most of the above functions can be performed with a lightweight client (e.g., a Web browser) executing on the client device 161, such that no or minimal special purpose software need be installed on the client device 161 to perform or access the full spectrum of signature services provided by the ESS 110. In this manner, described techniques overcome many of the limitations of known approaches to facilitating electronic signatures on mobile devices. For example, in a known approach, a client must install a special purpose signature application (a “signature app”) on a mobile phone to attach electronic signatures to documents. Unfortunately, this application is distinct from the email client on the mobile phone, such that the user must manually move a received document into the signature app, attach a signature, move the signed document back to the email client, and then transmit the signed document to a recipient. Such processing may be inefficient, cumbersome, and not user-friendly. Moreover, many signature apps do not include features such as document conversion, so they are unable to attach signatures to various common document formats. Furthermore, the diversity of mobile phone platforms (e.g., iPhone, Android, Blackberry) means developing and supporting distinct applications for each platform. The described techniques, on the other hand, are largely platform independent, as the core functionality is provided by the ESS 110, but accessed from diverse clients using standard Web browsers.
In addition, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/595,876, filed Aug. 27, 2012, and entitled “MOBILE SOLUTION FOR SIGNING AND RETAINING THIRD-PARTY DOCUMENTS,” further describes embodiments of an ESS configured to facilitate electronic signatures via mobile or other client devices, and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Techniques described herein may be used in combination with one or more of those described within U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/595,876.
The screen 200 also includes controls (e.g. links) for recovering a forgotten password 204, creating a new account 205, or signing in using social network credentials 206. Upon selecting control 205, the signer will be brought to an account creation screen. The signer will be asked to enter their email address, name, a password, and a password confirmation, and to agree to the terms and conditions of the ESS. If all are successful, a new account will be created for the signer. In some embodiments, the signer will be sent an activation email that informs the signer that an account has been created and that requests that the signer click on an included link to activate the account.
Upon selection of control 206, the signer will be asked to provide their credentials for a social network (e.g., Facebook, Google+, Twitter) or other information service (e.g., a free online email service). If the user does not have an account with the ESS that is associated with the provided credentials, the user will be prompted to create an account, as discussed above. If the user does have an associated account with the ESS, an authenticated session will be initiated (provided the correct credentials are provided).
The screen 210 also includes a tabs control 212 that includes tabs for accessing different screens of the client software on the client device. The control 212 includes a My Docs tab 213 for accessing the screen 210, a Capture tab 214 for accessing an image capture screen 220 (
Upon selection of the control 222, the signer will be presented with a photo browser to select one or more photos previously taken and stored on the client device. The browser may be a custom browser tailored to the signature software or a native or default photo browser provided by the client device. Once the user has captured and/or selected photos of the paper signature document, the screen 220 will display the selected photos as discussed with reference to
The signature screen 230 displays a signature document 233 and includes a menu bar 231. The signature document 233 is a copy or other representation of the images captured and imported by the signer, as discussed above. The menu bar 231 includes an Add control, a Finish control, and a More Options control. The Add control, when selected, displays a menu 232 of signature elements. The signature elements include a signature, signer initials, signer name, date signed, text, and checkbox. By selecting one of the signature elements, the user/signer can insert (e.g., drag and drop) the corresponding element into the signature document 233. In this example, the signer has selected and dragged a signature element 234 onto the document 233. The signature element 234 is an active control, which can be selected (e.g., touched, clicked) by the signer to associate his signature with the document 233.
When the user has reviewed and signed the document 233, the user selects the Finish control of the menu 231. The Finish control causes a signature gathered via the signature element 234 to be securely stored in association with the document 233 by the ESS 110. The Finish control may also provide options or otherwise access functions for providing the signed document 233 to one or more recipients. For example, the Finish control may automatically invoke an email client on the signer's client device. The email client may be automatically pre-populated with a message that includes a copy of (e.g., as an attachment) and/or reference to (e.g., URL) the signed document 233.
Note that while the example of
The process begins at block 302, where it captures an image of a signature document with a camera of a client device. As shown in
At block 304, the process causes the captured image to be stored at a remote electronic signature service as an electronic signature document. The signer client device 161 includes logic 163 that uploads, imports, or otherwise transmits the captured image to the electronic signature service, where it is securely stored.
At block 306, the process causes an electronic signature to be stored in association with the stored electronic signature document. Typically, the logic 163 will be operated by the user to “attach” a signature to the document. Attaching a signature may include transmitting an indication that the user has signed (possibly along with other data, such as date, signature form, and the like) to the electronic signature service, thereby causing the electronic signature service to securely store the signer's signature in association with the document.
Note that one or more general purpose or special purpose computing systems/devices may be used to implement the ESS 110. In addition, the computing system 100 may comprise one or more distinct computing systems/devices and may span distributed locations. Furthermore, each block shown may represent one or more such blocks as appropriate to a specific embodiment or may be combined with other blocks. Also, the ESS 110 may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or in some combination to achieve the capabilities described herein. In addition, the implementation techniques described herein may also be used to implement other aspects, including the client logic 163 of the signer client device 161.
In the embodiment shown, computing system 100 comprises a computer memory (“memory”) 101, a display 102, one or more Central Processing Units (“CPU”) 103, Input/Output devices 104 (e.g., keyboard, mouse, CRT or LCD display, and the like), other computer-readable media 105, and network connections 106 connected to a network 150. The ESS 110 is shown residing in memory 101. In other embodiments, some portion of the contents, some or all of the components of the ESS 110 may be stored on and/or transmitted over the other computer-readable media 105. The components of the ESS 110 preferably execute on one or more CPUs 103 and facilitate mobile electronic signature processes described herein. Other code or programs 130 (e.g., an administrative interface, a Web server, and the like) and potentially other data repositories, such as data repository 120, also reside in the memory 101, and preferably execute on one or more CPUs 103. Of note, one or more of the components in
The ESS 110 includes a service manager 111, a user interface (“UI”) manager 112, an electronic signature service application program interface (“API”) 113, and an electronic signature service data store 115.
The ESS 110, via the service manager 111 and related logic, generally performs electronic signature-related functions for or on behalf of users operating a sender client device 160 and/or a signer client device 161. In one embodiment, a signer operating signer client device 161 imports (e.g., transmits, uploads, sends) a document to be electronically signed into the ESS 110. As described above, importing a document may include capturing an image of a paper document, and then transmitting the captured image from the client device 161 to the ESS 110. The ESS stores the document securely in data store 115. Secure document storage may include using cryptographic techniques to detect document tampering, such as generating hashes, message digests, or the like. The signer operating the signer client device 161 may then access, review, and sign the document stored by the ESS 110. In some embodiments, the ESS 110 transmits images or some other representation of the document to the signer client device 161, which in turn transmits an indication of the signer's signature (or intent to sign) to the ESS 110. The ESS 110 then securely stores the signer's signature in association with the document in the data store 115. After signing the document, the signer using signer client device 161 can cause the ESS 110 to provide the signed document to one or more recipients, such as via email, fax, or other mechanism.
The service manager 111 may perform other or additional functions, such as intelligent form filling as discussed above. Also, the service manager 111 may provide (e.g., transmit) code modules that can be installed on the signer client device 161 and that are configured to integrate the signer client device 161 with the ESS 110. As one example, the code module may be a mobile application (e.g., app) that is installed on the signer client device 161. As another example, the code module may extend the functionality of an email client or other application by adding a control (e.g., button, menu item, widget) that is configured to import, in response to selection or activation by a user, a received documents into the ESS 110.
The UI manager 112 provides a view and a controller that facilitate user interaction with the ESS 110 and its various components. For example, the UI manager 112 may provide interactive access to the ESS 110, such that users can upload or download documents for signature, review and modify documents, transmit or otherwise provide signed documents to recipients, and the like. In some embodiments, access to the functionality of the UI manager 112 may be provided via a Web server, possibly executing as one of the other programs 130. In such embodiments, a user operating a Web browser (or other client) executing on one of the client devices 160 or 161 can interact with the ESS 110 via the UI manager 112.
The API 113 provides programmatic access to one or more functions of the ESS 110. For example, the API 113 may provide a programmatic interface to one or more functions of the ESS 110 that may be invoked by one of the other programs 130 or some other module. In this manner, the API 113 facilitates the development of third-party software, such as user interfaces, plug-ins, news feeds, adapters (e.g., for integrating functions of the ESS 110 into Web applications), and the like. In addition, the API 113 may be in at least some embodiments invoked or otherwise accessed via remote entities, such as the third-party system 165, to access various functions of the ESS 110. For example, a hosted email service executing on the system 165 may provide access to the electronic signature functionality of the ESS 110 via the API 113. As another example, an e-commerce site (e.g., online store) executing on the system 165 may provide access to the electronic signature functionality of the ESS 110 via the API 113, such as by providing a signature control/widget configured, when selected by a user, to initiate an electronic signature process as described herein.
The data store 115 is used by the other modules of the ESS 110 to store and/or communicate information. The components of the ESS 110 use the data store 115 to record various types of information, including documents, signatures, tracked form entries, and the like. Although the components of the ESS 110 are described as communicating primarily through the data store 115, other communication mechanisms are contemplated, including message passing, function calls, pipes, sockets, shared memory, and the like.
The ESS 110 interacts via the network 150 with client devices 160 and 161, and third-party systems 165. The network 150 may be any combination of one or more media (e.g., twisted pair, coaxial, fiber optic, radio frequency), hardware (e.g., routers, switches, repeaters, transceivers), and one or more protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, WiMAX) that facilitate communication between remotely situated humans and/or devices. In some embodiments, the network 150 may be or include multiple distinct communication channels or mechanisms (e.g., cable-based and wireless). The client devices 160 and 161 include personal computers, laptop computers, smart phones, personal digital assistants, tablet computers, kiosk systems, and the like. The third-party systems 165 and client devices 160 and 161 may be or include computing systems and/or devices constituted in a manner similar to that of computing system 100, and thus may also include displays, CPUs, other I/O devices (e.g., a camera), network connections, or the like.
In an example embodiment, components/modules of the ESS 110 are implemented using standard programming techniques. For example, the ESS 110 may be implemented as a “native” executable running on the CPU 103, along with one or more static or dynamic libraries. In other embodiments, the ESS 110 may be implemented as instructions processed by a virtual machine that executes as one of the other programs 130. In general, a range of programming languages known in the art may be employed for implementing such example embodiments, including representative implementations of various programming language paradigms, including but not limited to, object-oriented (e.g., Java, C++, C#, Visual Basic.NET, Smalltalk, and the like), functional (e.g., ML, Lisp, Scheme, and the like), procedural (e.g., C, Pascal, Ada, Modula, and the like), scripting (e.g., Perl, Ruby, Python, JavaScript, VBScript, and the like), and declarative (e.g., SQL, Prolog, and the like).
The embodiments described above may also use either well-known or proprietary synchronous or asynchronous client-server computing techniques. Also, the various components may be implemented using more monolithic programming techniques, for example, as an executable running on a single CPU computer system, or alternatively decomposed using a variety of structuring techniques known in the art, including but not limited to, multiprogramming, multithreading, client-server, or peer-to-peer, running on one or more computer systems each having one or more CPUs. Some embodiments may execute concurrently and asynchronously, and communicate using message passing techniques. Equivalent synchronous embodiments are also supported. Also, other functions could be implemented and/or performed by each component/module, and in different orders, and by different components/modules, yet still achieve the described functions.
In addition, programming interfaces to the data stored as part of the ESS 110, such as in the data store 118, can be available by standard mechanisms such as through C, C++, C#, and Java APIs; libraries for accessing files, databases, or other data repositories; through scripting languages such as XML; or through Web servers, FTP servers, or other types of servers providing access to stored data. The data store 118 may be implemented as one or more database systems, file systems, or any other technique for storing such information, or any combination of the above, including implementations using distributed computing techniques.
Different configurations and locations of programs and data are contemplated for use with techniques described herein. A variety of distributed computing techniques are appropriate for implementing the components of the illustrated embodiments in a distributed manner including but not limited to TCP/IP sockets, RPC, RMI, HTTP, Web Services (XML-RPC, JAX-RPC, SOAP, and the like). Other variations are possible. Also, other functionality could be provided by each component/module, or existing functionality could be distributed amongst the components/modules in different ways, yet still achieve the functions described herein.
Furthermore, in certain embodiments, some or all of the components of the ESS 110 may be implemented or provided in other manners, such as at least partially in firmware and/or hardware, including, but not limited to one or more application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”), standard integrated circuits, controllers executing appropriate instructions, and including microcontrollers and/or embedded controllers, field-programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), complex programmable logic devices (“CPLDs”), and the like. Some or all of the system components and/or data structures may also be stored as contents (e.g., as executable or other machine-readable software instructions or structured data) on a computer-readable medium (e.g., as a hard disk; a memory; a computer network or cellular wireless network or other data transmission medium; or a portable media article to be read by an appropriate drive or via an appropriate connection, such as a DVD or flash memory device) so as to enable or configure the computer-readable medium and/or one or more associated computing systems or devices to execute or otherwise use or provide the contents to perform at least some of the described techniques. Some or all of the components and/or data structures may be stored in a non-transitory manner on tangible, non-transitory storage mediums. Some or all of the system components and data structures may also be stored as data signals (e.g., by being encoded as part of a carrier wave or included as part of an analog or digital propagated signal) on a variety of computer-readable transmission mediums, which are then transmitted, including across wireless-based and wired/cable-based mediums, and may take a variety of forms (e.g., as part of a single or multiplexed analog signal, or as multiple discrete digital packets or frames). Such computer program products may also take other forms in other embodiments. Accordingly, embodiments of this disclosure may be practiced with other computer system configurations.
It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises,” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the written description and/or claims refer to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring at least one element from the group (A, B, C N), rather than A plus N, or B plus N, etc.
All of the above-cited references, including U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/527,406, filed Aug. 25, 2011, entitled “MOBILE SOLUTION FOR SIGNING AND RETAINING THIRD-PARTY DOCUMENTS;” U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/552,359, filed Oct. 27, 2011, entitled “MOBILE SOLUTION FOR IMPORTING AND SIGNING THIRD-PARTY ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/595,876, filed Aug. 27, 2012, entitled “MOBILE SOLUTION FOR SIGNING AND RETAINING THIRD-PARTY DOCUMENTS” are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Where a definition or use of a term in an incorporated reference is inconsistent with or contrary to the definition or use of that term provided herein, the definition or use of that term provided herein governs.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/552,359, filed Oct. 27, 2011. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/595,876, filed Aug. 27, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/527,406, filed Aug. 25, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5040142 | Mori et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5220675 | Padawer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222138 | Balabon et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5337360 | Fischer | Aug 1994 | A |
5390247 | Fischer | Feb 1995 | A |
5465299 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5544255 | Smithies et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5615268 | Bisbee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
5689567 | Miyauchi | Nov 1997 | A |
5748738 | Bisbee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832499 | Gustman | Nov 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898156 | Wilfong | Apr 1999 | A |
6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067531 | Hoyt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085322 | Romney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092080 | Gustman | Jul 2000 | A |
6119229 | Martinez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128740 | Curry et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161139 | Win et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185587 | Bernardo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199052 | Mitty et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210276 | Mullins | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237096 | Bisbee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289460 | Hajmiragha | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321333 | Murray | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327656 | Zabetian | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6367010 | Venkatram et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367013 | Bisbee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446115 | Powers | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6470448 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6553494 | Glass | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615348 | Gibbs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658403 | Kuroda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671805 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6726094 | Rantze et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728762 | Estrada et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751632 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754829 | Butt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6796489 | Slater et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807633 | Pavlik | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829635 | Townshend | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6912660 | Petrogiannis | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931420 | Silvester et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938157 | Kaplan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944648 | Cochran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947911 | Moritsu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6959382 | Kinnis et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961854 | Serret-Avila et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973569 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990684 | Futamura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7039805 | Messing | May 2006 | B1 |
7059516 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069443 | Berringer et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093130 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100045 | Yamada | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103778 | Kon et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140541 | Stelzer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162635 | Bisbee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167844 | Leong et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7197644 | Brewington | May 2007 | B2 |
7237114 | Rosenberg | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7340608 | Laurie et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343551 | Bourdev | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7360079 | Wall | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7395436 | Nemovicher | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7395503 | Pravetz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424543 | Rice, III | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437421 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7523315 | Hougaard et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533268 | Catoricini et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7554576 | Erol et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562053 | Twining et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568101 | Catoricini et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568104 | Berryman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7581105 | Dietl | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581106 | Das et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7657832 | Lin | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7660863 | Boursetty et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7788259 | Patterson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7934098 | Hahn et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7953977 | Maruyama et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8103867 | Spitz | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132013 | Meier | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8286071 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8588483 | Hicks | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8612349 | Ledder et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8838980 | Gonser et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010018739 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034739 | Anecki et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034835 | Smith | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004800 | Kikuta | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019937 | Edstrom et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026427 | Kon et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026582 | Futamura et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040431 | Kato | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069179 | Slater | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069358 | Silvester | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020128969 | Parmelee et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129056 | Conant et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138445 | Laage et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143711 | Nassiri | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162000 | Bensler | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178187 | Rasmussen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184485 | Dray et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194219 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196478 | Struble | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030048301 | Menninger | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051016 | Miyoshi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078880 | Alley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120553 | Williams | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120930 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131073 | Lucovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140252 | Lafon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030217275 | Bentley et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040054606 | Broerman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078337 | King et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107352 | Yui et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117627 | Brewington | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133493 | Ford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181756 | Berringer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225884 | Lorenzini et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230891 | Pravetz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250070 | Wong | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255114 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255127 | Arnouse | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033811 | Bhogal et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049903 | Raja | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076215 | Dryer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091143 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050120217 | Fifield et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165626 | Karpf | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182684 | Dawson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182956 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192908 | Jorimann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231738 | Huff et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060041605 | King | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041632 | Shah | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047600 | Bodenheim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060161780 | Berryman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161781 | Rice et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174199 | Soltis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205476 | Jubinville | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259440 | Leake et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261545 | Rogers | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294152 | Kawabe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026927 | Yaldoo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079139 | Kim | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088958 | Qa'Im-maqami | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118732 | Whitmore | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130186 | Ramsey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136361 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143085 | Kimmel | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165865 | Talvitie | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198533 | Foygel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208944 | Pavlicic | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220260 | King | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070271592 | Noda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289022 | Wittkotter | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016357 | Suarez | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034213 | Boemker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097777 | Rielo | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080141033 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209313 | Gonser | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209516 | Nassiri | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216147 | Duffy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235577 | Veluchamy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260287 | Berryman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080313723 | Naono et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024912 | McCabe et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025087 | Peirson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044019 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090099881 | Hanna et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132351 | Gibson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138730 | Cook et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145958 | Stoutenburg et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185241 | Nepomniachtchi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268903 | Bojinov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292786 | McCabe | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090327144 | Hatter et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100088364 | Carter et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122094 | Shima | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153011 | Obrea et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100217987 | Shevade | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235727 | Ashton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274863 | Foygel et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100287260 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293094 | Kolkowitz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110093769 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093807 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119165 | Zee | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126022 | Sieberer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110238510 | Rowen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264907 | Betz et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314371 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120180135 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190405 | Kumaran | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209970 | Scipioni et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120271882 | Sachdeva et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120304265 | Richter et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019156 | Gonser et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019289 | Gonser et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130050512 | Gonser et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067243 | Tamayo-Rios et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130159720 | Gonser | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179676 | Hamid | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130254111 | Gonser et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263283 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140019761 | Shapiro | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140304518 | Gonser et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101326517 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101299256 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101364869 | Feb 2009 | CN |
1238321 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2748721 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2391669 | Feb 2004 | GB |
2000048072 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003271529 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003296192 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003323574 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2005148917 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005267438 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005311545 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006033727 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007006122 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2008117258 | May 2008 | JP |
2008225527 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2011024155 | Feb 2011 | JP |
20000049674 | Aug 2000 | KR |
1020020092595 | Dec 2002 | KR |
1020070059931 | Jun 2007 | KR |
100929488 | Dec 2009 | KR |
20090122657 | Dec 2009 | KR |
2400811 | Nov 2005 | RU |
2291491 | Oct 2007 | RU |
2300844 | Jun 2010 | RU |
11201401760V | Apr 2016 | SG |
1996007156 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO-9607156 | Mar 1996 | WO |
2003091834 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2007075235 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008124627 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009012478 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009012478 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2010105262 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010105262 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2013029048 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013063494 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wheeler et al., “DocuSign Unveils new Scalable Product and Support Offerings of Electronic Signature and Electronic Contract Execution,” DocuSign The Fastest Way to Get a Signature, 2 pp., Jan. 2008. |
Borozdin et al., “DocuSign Connect Service Guide,” DocuSign, Inc., pp. 1-9, 2008. |
ELynx Adds Workflow Management to Electronic Document Platform—new Workflow Capabilities Provide for Enhanced Electronic Loan Processing, eLynx, http://www.elynx.com/news/view/82, 2 pp. Jan. 2009. |
Laurens Leurs; The history of PDF; Feb. 14, 2010; Prepressure.com; pp. 1-12. |
Brown, “Digital Signatures: Can They Be Accepted as Legal Signatures in EID?”, Dec. 1993, ACM, p. 86-92. |
Herzberg et al., “Surf'N'Sign: Client Signatures on Web Documents”, 1998, IEEE, vol. 37 Issue 1, p. 61-71. |
Kwok et al., “An Automatic Electronic Contract Document Signing System in a Secure Environment”, 2005, IEEE, p. 497-502. |
Su et al., “Signature-In-Signature Verification Via a Secure Simple Network Protocol”, 2010, IEEE, p. 1-4. |
Zefferer et al., “An Electronic-Signature Based Circular Resolution Database System,” Mar. 2010, ACM, p. 1840-1845. |
Kamara et al., “Cryptographic Cloud Storage”, 2010, Financial Cryptography and Data Security, p. 136-149. |
Harold, Elliotte Rusty, XML Bible. IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1999, p. 191-192. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,876, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2013”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,876, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2014”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,876, Response filed Sep. 30, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280064786.2, Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2016”, (English Translation), 22 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12843451.1, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12843451.1, Response filed Nov. 4, 2015 to Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2015”, 41 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/062258, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/062258, International Search Report dated Mar. 28, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/062258, Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201401760V, Response filed Nov. 20, 2015 to Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
Barnasak, O, et al., “A Secure Proxy Signature Protocol for Agent-Based M-Conunerce Applications”, Published in: Computers and Conununications, Proceedings. ISCC 2004 Ninth International Symposium on (vol. 1 ), (2004), 399-406. |
Nentwich, et al., “Practical Security Aspects of Digital Signature Systems”, Technical University Vienna. Technical (2006), (2006), 1-11. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Apr. 24, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 20, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Response filed Apr. 25, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Response filed Nov. 2, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, Second Preliminary Amendment and Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment filed Apr. 30, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application serial No. 2012298605, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application serial No. 2012298605, Response filed Dec. 8, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2016”, 21 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280052552.6, Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2015”, W/ English Translation, 21 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280052552.6, Response filed Feb. 15, 2016 to Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2015”, W/ English Claims, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280064786.2, Response filed Aug. 4, 2016 to Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2016”, W/ English Claims, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Name Application Serial No. 201280052552.6, Office Action dated May 23, 2016”, W/ English Translation, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Name Application Serial No. 201280052552.6, Response filed Aug. 8, 2016 to Office Action dated May 23, 2016”, W/ English Claims, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12826301.9, Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12826301.9, Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2015”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 12826301.9, Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12826301.9, Response filed Sep. 7, 2015 to Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2015”, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12826301.9, Response filed Oct. 2, 2014”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/052554, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 6, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/052554, International Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/052554, Written Opinion dated Jan. 23, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2014-527354, Examiners Decision of Final Refusal dated Jan. 13, 2016”, W/ English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2014-527354, Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016”, W/ English Translation, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2014-527354, Response filed Sep. 29, 2016 to Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016”, W/ English Claims, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2014-539081, Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2016”, W/ English Translation, 5 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201400184Y, Examination Report dated Jun. 29, 2015”, 13 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201400184Y, Response filed Jun. 15, 2015 to Written Opinion dated Dec. 18, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201400184Y, Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201400184Y, Written Opinion dated Dec. 18, 2014”, 12 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201401760V, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 20, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/310,805, filed Jun. 20, 2014, Mobile Solution for Signing and Retaining Third Party-Documents. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130050512 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61552359 | Oct 2011 | US | |
61527406 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13595876 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 13662173 | US |