Mobile tele-presence system with a microphone system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9616576
  • Patent Number
    9,616,576
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 10, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 11, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A remote controlled robot system that includes a robot and a remote control station. The robot includes a binaural microphone system that is coupled to a speaker system of the remote control station. The binaural microphone system may include a pair of microphones located at opposite sides of a robot head. the location of the microphones roughly coincides with the location of ears on a human body. Such microphone location creates a mobile robot that more effectively simulates the tele-presence of an operator of the system. The robot may include two different microphone systems and the ability to switch between systems. For example, the robot may also include a zoom camera system and a directional microphone. The directional microphone may be utilized to capture sound from a direction that corresponds to an object zoomed upon by the camera system.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The subject matter disclosed generally relates to the field of mobile two-way teleconferencing.


2. Background Information


Robots have been used in a variety of applications ranging from remote control of hazardous material to assisting in the performance of surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,458 issued to Wang et al. discloses a system that allows a surgeon to perform minimally invasive medical procedures through the use of robotically controlled instruments. One of the robotic arms in the Wang system moves an endoscope that has a camera. The camera allows a surgeon to view a surgical area of a patient.


Tele-robots such as hazardous waste handlers and bomb detectors may contain a camera that allows the operator to view the remote site. U.S. Pat. No. 6,914,622 issued to Smith et al. and assigned to Telbotics, Inc. (“Telbotics patent”) discloses a teleconferencing platform that has both a camera and a monitor. The platform includes mechanisms to both pivot and raise the camera and the monitor. The Telbotics patent has a microphone and a system that automatically swivels the monitor to the origin of sound so that the user's image as displayed by the robot monitor faces a speaker.


There has been marketed a mobile robot introduced by InTouch Technologies, Inc., the assignee of this application, under the trademarks COMPANION and RP-7. The InTouch robot is controlled by a user at a remote station. The remote station may be a personal computer with a joystick that allows the user to remotely control the movement of the robot. Both the robot and remote station have cameras, monitors, speakers and microphones to allow for two-way video/audio communication. The robot camera provides video images to a screen at the remote station so that the user can view the robot's surroundings and move the robot accordingly. It would be desirable to create a microphone system that more closely simulated sound perceived by human errors so that the user experiences a more realistic auditory presence through the robot.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A remote controlled robot system that includes a robot and a remote control station. The robot includes a monitor and a binaural microphone system. The remote control station includes a speaker system coupled to the binaural microphone system.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a robotic system;



FIG. 1A is an illustration showing the relationship of two microphones relative to a monitor of a robot head;



FIG. 2 is a schematic of an electrical system of a robot;



FIG. 3 is a graphical user interface of a remote station.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed is a remote controlled robot system that includes a robot and a remote control station. The robot includes a binaural microphone system that is coupled to a speaker system of the remote control station. The binaural microphone system may include a pair of microphones located at opposite sides of a robot head. The location of the microphones roughly coincides with the location of ears on a human body. Such microphone location provides the remote operator with a realistic auditory presence including directionality and distance, as if the operator were actually present at the robot location. The robot may include two different microphone systems and the ability to switch between systems. For example, the robot may also include a zoom camera system and a directional microphone. The directional microphone may be utilized to capture sound from a direction that corresponds to an object zoomed upon by the camera system.


Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers, FIG. 1 shows a robotic system 10 that can be used to conduct a remote visit. The robotic system 10 includes a robot 12, a base station 14 and a remote control station 16. The remote control station 16 may be coupled to the base station 14 through a network 18. By way of example, the network 18 may be either a packet switched network such as the Internet, or a circuit switched network such has a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or other broadband system. The base station 14 may be coupled to the network 18 by a modem 20 or other broadband network interface device. By way of example, the base station 14 may be a wireless router. Alternatively, the robot 12 may have a direct connection to the network thru for example a satellite.


The remote control station 16 may include a computer 22 that has a monitor 24, a camera 26, a microphone 28 and a speaker 30. The station 16 may also include a headset 31 that can be worn by the user. The computer 22 may have an input device 32 such as a joystick and/or a mouse and a keyboard 33. The control station 16 is typically located in a place that is remote from the robot 12. Although only one remote control station 16 is shown, the system 10 may include a plurality of remote stations. In general any number of robots 12 may be controlled by any number of remote stations 16 or other robots 12. For example, one remote station 16 may be coupled to a plurality of robots 12, or one robot 12 may be coupled to a plurality of remote stations 16, or a plurality of robots 12.


Each robot 12 includes a movement platform 34 that is attached to a robot housing 36. As shown in FIG. 2 each robot 12 may include a monitor 40 that display an image of the operator at the remote control station. The monitor 40 may be part of a robot head 42 that moves relative to the movement platform 34. The head 42 may have a speaker system 44 that generates sound provided by the remote control station.


The robot 12 includes a binaural microphone system 46. The binaural microphone system 46 includes a first microphone 48 located on one side of the head and a second microphone 50 located on another side of the head. The microphones 48 and 50 are located at positions approximately similar to the location of ears on a human body. By way of example, the microphones 48 and 50 can be located about 18 centimeters apart. Utilizing a binaural microphone system 46 creates a robot head that approximates a human head. By way of example, the binaural microphone system 46 may be a matched pair of omni-directional electric condenser microphones. One definition of binaural is that the microphones 48 and 50 are located at positions at approximately equal angles relative to a plane that intersects and is essentially perpendicular to the camera system which is incident with the monitor 40 as shown in FIG. 1A (e.g. θ12).


A matched pair of microphones produce an equal voltage for a given sound pressure. The output signals of the microphones may be processed to produce stereo audio channels. An example of a matched microphone system is a product sold by Sound Professionals under the product designation SP-BMC-12. The speaker system of the remote control station may include headphones as shown in FIG. 1.


The robot 12 may also have a directional microphone 52. The directional microphone 52 can be used to capture sound received in a certain direction(s). For example, the directional microphone 52 may be a barrel-like structure that captures sound traveling along a desired axis but impedes off-axis sound. An example, of such a directional microphone is a product sold by Sennheiser under the product designation ME66/K6.


The robot 12 has a camera system. The camera system may include a first camera 54 and a second camera 56. The second camera 56 may include a zoom len(s) and is utilized when the system is in a zoom mode. The first camera 54 may provide images in a non-zoom mode. The system can be configured so that the sound captured by the directional microphone is the sole or primary sound recreated at the remote control station. Although two cameras are shown and described, it is to be understood that the robot may contain only one camera that has the capability to provide a zoom image and a non-zoom image.


The robot 12 may also have an antenna 58 that is wirelessly coupled to an antenna 60 of the base station 14. The system 10 allows a user at the remote control station 16 to move the robot 12 through operation of the input device 32. The robot cameras 54 and 56 are coupled to the remote monitor 24 so that a user at the remote station 16 can view a patient. Likewise, the robot monitor 40 is coupled to the remote camera 26 so that the patient can view the user. The microphones 28 and 48, 50 and 52, and speakers 30 and 44, allow for audible communication between the patient and the user.


The remote station computer 22 may operate Microsoft OS software and WINDOWS XP or other operating systems such as LINUX. The remote computer 22 may also operate a video driver, a camera driver, an audio driver and a joystick driver. The video images may be transmitted and received with compression software such as MPEG CODEC.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of a robot 12. Each robot 12 may include a high level control system 70. The high level control system 50 may include a processor 72 that is connected to a bus 74. The bus 74 is coupled to the cameras 54 and 56 by an input/output (I/O) ports 76 and 78, respectively. The monitor 40 is coupled to the bus 74 by a serial output port 80 and a VGA driver 82. The monitor 40 may include a touchscreen function that allows the patient to enter input by touching the monitor screen.


The microphones 48, 50 and 52 are coupled to the bus 74 by digital to analog converters 84, 86 and 88, respectively. The speaker 44 is coupled to the bus 74 by an analog to digital converter 90. The high level controller 70 may also contain random access memory (RAM) device 92, a non-volatile RAM device 94 and a mass storage device 96 that are all coupled to the bus 74. The mass storage device 96 may contain medical files of the patient that can be accessed by the user at the remote control station 16. For example, the mass storage device 96 may contain a picture of the patient. The user, particularly a health care provider, can recall the old picture and make a side by side comparison on the monitor 24 with a present video image of the patient provided by the camera 38. The robot antennae 58 may be coupled to a wireless transceiver 98. By way of example, the transceiver 98 may transmit and receive information in accordance with IEEE 802.11b.


The controller 70 may operate with a LINUX OS operating system. The controller 70 may also operate MS WINDOWS along with video, camera and audio drivers for communication with the remote control station 16. Video information may be transceived using MPEG CODEC compression techniques. The software may allow the user to send e-mail to the patient and vice versa, or allow the patient to access the Internet. In general the high level controller 50 operates to control communication between the robot 12 and the remote control station 16.


The remote control station 16 may include a computer that is similar to the high level controller 50. The computer would have a processor, memory, I/O, software, firmware, etc. for generating, transmitting, receiving and processing information.


The high level controller 70 may be linked to a low level controller 100 by a serial port 102. The low level controller 100 runs software routines that mechanically actuate the robot 12. For example, the low level controller 100 provides instructions to actuate the movement platform to move the robot 12. The low level controller 52 may receive movement instructions from the high level controller 70. The movement instructions may be received as movement commands from the remote control station or another robot. Although two controllers are shown, it is to be understood that each robot 12 may have one controller, or more than two controllers, controlling the high and low level functions.


The robot 12 may have mechanisms so that the monitor 40, cameras 56 and 58 and microphones 48, 50 and 52 all move together in at least two degrees of freedom. Moving the microphones with the cameras insures that the microphone system provides stereophonic sound for all robot head positions. The system may be the same or similar to a robotic system provided by the assignee InTouch-Health, Inc. of Santa Barbara, Calif. under the name RP-6. The system may also be the same or similar to the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,158,859 that issued on Jan. 2, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference.



FIG. 3 shows a display user interface (“DUI”) 120 that can be displayed at the remote station 16. The DUI 120 may include a robot view field 122 that displays a video image provided by the camera of the robot. The DUI 120 may also include a station view field 124 that displays a video image provided by the camera of the remote station 16. The DUI 120 may be part of an application program stored and operated by the computer 22 of the remote station 16.


The DUI 120 can include graphical icons 126 and 128 that allow the user to switch between the directional microphone and binaural microphone system, respectively. The DUI 120 may include a graphical overlay 130 in the robot view field 122 that indicates an origin of sound. The position of the overlay 130 corresponds to the sound origin. For example, the position of the overlay 130 shown in FIG. 3 indicates that the origin of sound is to the left of the robot. The user can then move the robot accordingly to improve the volume heard by the microphone system.


The origin of sound can be determined by initially looking at the time of difference between the arrival of sound to both microphones 48 and 50. The peak time td can be found in the correlation function C1,2(t)=X1(i)*X2(i+t) for all i. An estimate for the angle of arrival (a) can be computed from the trig function a=arcsin(v*td/d1,2) where d1,2 is the distance between microphones and v is the velocity of sound.


The system may have an automatic mode such that sound captured by the binaural microphone system is reproduced by the remote station when the camera system is in a non-zoom mode and sound captured by the directional microphone is reproduced by the station when the camera system is in a zoom mode. The user can switch between automatic and manual modes by selecting an icon (not shown). A letter “A” may appear adjacent to the icon when the system is in automatic mode. A letter “M” may appear when the system is in the manual mode.


In operation, the robot 12 may be placed in a home or a facility where one or more patients are to be monitored and/or assisted. The facility may be a hospital or a residential care facility. By way of example, the robot 12 may be placed in a home where a health care provider may monitor and/or assist the patient. Likewise, a friend or family member may communicate with the patient. The cameras and monitors at both the robot and remote control stations allow for teleconferencing between the patient and the person at the remote station(s).


The robot 12 can be maneuvered through the home or a facility by manipulating the input device 32 at a remote station 16. The robot 10 may be controlled by a number of different users. To accommodate for this the robot may have an arbitration system. The arbitration system may be integrated into the operating system of the robot 12. For example, the arbitration technique may be embedded into the operating system of the high-level controller 50.


By way of example, the users may be divided into classes that include the robot itself, a local user, a caregiver, a doctor, a family member, or a service provider. The robot 12 may override input commands that conflict with robot operation. For example, if the robot runs into a wall, the system may ignore all additional commands to continue in the direction of the wall. A local user is a person who is physically present with the robot. The robot could have an input device that allows local operation. For example, the robot may incorporate a voice recognition system that receives and interprets audible commands.


A caregiver is someone who remotely monitors the patient. A doctor is a medical professional who can remotely control the robot and also access medical files contained in the robot memory. The family and service users remotely access the robot. The service user may service the system such as by upgrading software, or setting operational parameters.


The robot 12 may operate in one of two different modes; an exclusive mode, or a sharing mode. In the exclusive mode only one user has access control of the robot. The exclusive mode may have a priority assigned to each type of user. By way of example, the priority may be in order of local, doctor, caregiver, family and then service user. In the sharing mode two or more users may share access with the robot. For example, a caregiver may have access to the robot, the caregiver may then enter the sharing mode to allow a doctor to also access the robot. Both the caregiver and the doctor can conduct a simultaneous tele-conference with the patient.


The arbitration scheme may have one of four mechanisms; notification, timeouts, queue and call back. The notification mechanism may inform either a present user or a requesting user that another user has, or wants, access to the robot. The timeout mechanism gives certain types of users a prescribed amount of time to finish access to the robot. The queue mechanism is an orderly waiting list for access to the robot. The call back mechanism informs a user that the robot can be accessed. By way of example, a family user may receive an e-mail message that the robot is free for usage. Tables I and II, show how the mechanisms resolve access request from the various users.














TABLE I






Access
Medical
Command
Software/Debug
Set


User
Control
Record
Override
Access
Priority







Robot
No
No
Yes (1)
No
No


Local
No
No
Yes (2)
No
No


Caregiver
Yes
Yes
Yes (3)
No
No


Doctor
No
Yes
No
No
No


Family
No
No
No
No
No


Service
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes


















TABLE II









Requesting User













Local
Caregiver
Doctor
Family
Service

















Current
Local
Not Allowed
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of


User


pending user
pending user
pending user
pending user





Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user





that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use





Set timeout
Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout







Call back
Call back



Caregiver
Warn current user of
Not Allowed
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of




pending user.

pending user
pending user
pending user




Notify requesting user

Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use.

that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use




Release control

Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout






Queue or callback

Callback



Doctor
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Notify requesting user
Warn current user of




pending user
pending user
pending user
that system is in use
pending user




Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use
Queue or callback
that system is in use




Release control
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout

No timeout






Callback

Callback



Family
Warn current user of
Notify requesting user
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Warn current user of




pending user
that system is in use
pending user
pending user
pending user




Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
Put in queue or
that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use




Release Control
callback
Set timeout = 1 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout







Queue or callback
Callback



Service
Warn current user of
Notify requesting user
Warn current user of
Warn current user of
Not Allowed




pending user
that system is in use
request
pending user




Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
Callback
that system is in use
that system is in use




No timeout

No timeout
No timeout






Callback
Queue or callback









The information transmitted between the station 16 and the robot 12 may be encrypted. Additionally, the user may have to enter a password to enter the system 10. A selected robot is then given an electronic key by the station 16. The robot 12 validates the key and returns another key to the station 16. The keys are used to encrypt information transmitted in the session.


The robot 12 and remote station 16 transmit commands through the broadband network 18. The commands can be generated by the user in a variety of ways. For example, commands to move the robot may be generated by moving the joystick 32 (see FIG. 1). The commands are preferably assembled into packets in accordance with TCP/IP protocol. Table III provides a list of control commands that are generated at the remote station and transmitted to the robot through the network.









TABLE III







Control Commands









Command
Example
Description





drive
drive 10.0 0.0 5.0
The drive command directs the robot to move




at the specified velocity (in cm/sec) in the




(x, y) plane, and turn its facing at the




specified rate (degrees/sec).


goodbye
goodbye
The goodbye command terminates a user




session and relinquishes control of the




robot


gotoHomePosition
gotoHomePosition 1
The gotoHomePosition command moves the head




to a fixed “home” position (pan and tilt),




and restores zoom to default value. The




index value can be 0, 1, or 2. The exact




pan/tilt values for each index are specified




in robot configuration files.


head
head vel pan 5.0 tilt
The head command controls the head motion.



10.0
It can send commands in two modes,




identified by keyword: either positional




(“pos”) or velocity (“vol”). In velocity




mode, the pan and tilt values are desired




velocities of the head on the pan and tilt




axes, in degree/sec. A single command can




include just the pan section, or just the




tilt section, or both.


keepalive
keepalive
The keepalive command causes no action, but




keeps the communication (socket) link open




so that a session can continue. In scripts,




it can be used to introduce delay time into




the action.


odometry
odometry 5
The odometry command enables the flow of




odometry messages from the robot. The




argument is the number of times odometry is




to be reported each second. A value of 0




turns odometry off.


reboot
reboot
The reboot command causes the robot computer




to reboot immediately. The ongoing session




is immediately broken off.


restoreHeadPosition
restoreHeadPosition
The restoreHeadPosition functions like the




gotoHomePosition command, but it homes the




head to a position previously saved with




gotoHomePosition.


saveHeadPosition
saveHeadPosition
The saveHeadPosition command causes the




robot to save the current head position (pan




and tilt) in a scratch location in temporary




storage so that this position can be




restored. Subsequent calls to




“restoreHeadPosition” will restore this




saved position. Each call to




saveHeadPosition overwrites any previously




saved position.


setCameraFocus
setCameraFocus 100.0
The setCameraFocus command controls focus




for the camera on the robot side. The value




sent is passed “raw” to the video




application running on the robot, which




interprets it according to its own




specification.


setCameraZoom
setCameraZoom 100.0
The setCameraZoom command controls zoom for




the camera on the robot side. The value




sent is passed “raw” to the video




application running on the robot, which




interprets it according to its own




specification.


shutdown
Shutdown
The shutdown command shuts down the robot




and powers down its computer.


stop
stop
The stop command directs the robot to stop




moving immediately. It is assumed this will




be as sudden a stop as the mechanism can




safely accommodate.


timing
Timing 3245629 500
The timing message is used to estimate




message latency. It holds the UCT value




(seconds + milliseconds) of the time the




message was sent, as recorded on the sending




machine. To do a valid test, you must




compare results in each direction (i.e.,




sending from machine A to machine B, then




from machine B to machine A) in order to




account for differences in the clocks




between the two machines. The robot records




data internally to estimate average and




maximum latency over the course of a




session, which it prints to log files.


userTask
userTask “Jane Doe”
The userTask command notifies the robot of



“Remote Visit”
the current user and task. It typically is




sent once at the start of the session,




although it can be sent during a session if




the user and/or task change. The robot uses




this information for record-keeping.









Table IV provides a list of reporting commands that are generated by the robot and transmitted to the remote station through the network.









TABLE IV







Reporting Commands









Command
Example
Description





abnormalExit
abnormalExit
This message informs the user that the robot




software has crashed or otherwise exited




abnormally. Te robot software catches top-




level exceptions and generates this message




if any such exceptions occur.


bodyType
bodyType 3
The bodyType message informs the station




which type body (using the numbering of the




mechanical team) the current robot has.




This allows the robot to be drawn correctly




in the station user interface, and allows




for any other necessary body-specific




adjustments.


driveEnabled
driveEnabled true
This message is sent at the start of a




session to indicate whether the drive system




is operational.


emergencyShutdown
emergencyShutdown
This message informs the station that the




robot software has detected a possible




“runaway” condition (an failure causing the




robot to move out of control) and is




shutting the entire system down to prevent




hazardous motion.


odometry
odometry 10 20 340
The odometry command reports the current




(x, y) position (cm) and body orientation




(degrees) of the robot, in the original




coordinate space of the robot at the start




of the session.


sensorGroup
group_data
Sensors on the robot are arranged into




groups, each group of a single type (bumps,




range sensors, charge meter, etc.) The




sensorGroup message is sent once per group




at the start of each session. It contains




the number, type, locations, and any other




relevant data for the sensors in that group.




The station assumes nothing about the




equipment carried on the robot; everything




it knows about the sensors comes from the




sensorGroup messages.


sensorState
groupName state data
The sensorState command reports the current




state values for a specified group of




sensor. The syntax and interpretation for




the state data is specific to each group.




This message is sent once for each group at




each sensor evaluation (normally several




times per second).


systemError
systemError
This message informs the station user of a



driveController
failure in one of the robot's subsystems.




The error_type argument indicates which




subsystem failed, including driveController,




sensorController, headHome.


systemInfo
systemInfo wireless 45
This message allows regular reporting of




information that falls outside the sensor




system such as wireless signal strength.


text
text “This is some
The text string sends a text string from the



text”
robot to the station, where the string is




displayed to the user. This message is used




mainly for debugging.


version
version 1.6
This message identifies the software version




currently running on the robot. It is sent




once at the start of the session to allow




the station to do any necessary backward




compatibility adjustments.









The processor 72 of the robot high level controller 70 may operate a program that determines whether the robot 12 has received a robot control command within a time interval. For example, if the robot 12 does not receive a control command within 2 seconds then the processor 54 provides instructions to the low level controller 50 to stop the robot 12. Although a software embodiment is described, it is to be understood that the control command monitoring feature could be implemented with hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The hardware may include a timer that is reset each time a control command is received and generates, or terminates, a command or signal, to stop the robot.


The remote station computer 22 may monitor the receipt of video images provided by the robot camera. The computer 22 may generate and transmit a STOP command to the robot if the remote station does not receive or transmit an updated video image within a time interval. The STOP command causes the robot to stop. By way of example, the computer 22 may generate a STOP command if the remote control station does not receive a new video image within 2 seconds. Although a software embodiment is described, it is to be understood that the video image monitoring feature could be implemented with hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The hardware may include a timer that is reset each time a new video image is received and generates, or terminates, a command or signal, to generate the robot STOP command.


The robot may be a robot head that can both pivot and spin the camera 38 and the monitor 40. Such a head is described in the '859 patent. The robot head 350 may be in the system either with or instead of the mobile robot 12. The robot head can be particularly useful for doctor proctoring. The head can be located at a medical facility such as an emergency room or a doctor's office. A doctor at the remote location can assist in the diagnosis and medical treatment of a patient located at the robot location. The doctor can move the head to view the patient through control commands from the remote control station. Doctor proctoring can also be performed with a mobile robot 12.


While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A telepresence system, comprising: a telepresence device with a camera, a monitor, a speaker, a plurality of microphones; and,a remote station that transmits commands to control the telepresence device, the remote station includes a camera coupled to the telepresence device monitor, a monitor coupled to the telepresence device camera, a microphone coupled to the telepresence device speaker, and a speaker system that is coupled to one or more one or more of the telepresence device microphones, wherein the remote station monitor displays a display user interface with a graphical element that can be used to switch the remote station speaker system from reproducing sound from a first number of microphones of the telepresence device and a second number of microphones of the telepresence device, wherein both of the first and second numbers are greater than or equal to one and the first and second numbers are different.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the telepresence device camera and the telepresence device microphones are attached to a robot head that can move in at least two degrees of freedom.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of telepresence device microphones includes a first microphone and a second microphone that are spaced at approximately equal angles relative to a plane that intersects the telepresence device camera.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of telepresence device microphones includes a directional microphone.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the telepresence device camera can switch between zoom and non-zoom modes and the directional microphone is utilized when the camera system is in the zoom mode.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the display user interface provides a graphical depiction of an origin of sound.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the telepresence device includes a mobile platform.
  • 8. A telepresence system, comprising: a telepresence device with a camera, a monitor, a speaker, and a plurality of microphone systems that move together, the plurality of microphone systems includes a first microphone system having a first number of microphones and a second microphone system having a second number of microphones, wherein the first and second numbers are different; and,a remote station that transmits commands to control the telepresence device, the remote station includes a speaker system that is coupled to at least one of the plurality of microphone systems of the telepresence device and a monitor coupled to the telepresence device camera, wherein the remote station monitor displays a display user interface that includes a graphical element that can be used to switch between the first and second microphone systems.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein one of the telepresence device microphone systems includes a first microphone located on a first side of the telepresence device camera and a second microphone located on a second side of the telepresence device camera.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the first and second microphones are spaced at approximately equal angles relative to a plane that intersects the telepresence device camera.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein one of the telepresence device microphone system includes a directional microphone, the telepresence device camera can switch between a zoom mode and a non-zoom modes, and the directional microphone is utilized when said camera system is in said zoom mode.
  • 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the display user interface provides a graphical depiction of an origin of sound.
  • 13. The system of claim 8, wherein the telepresence device monitor is coupled to a camera of the remote station.
  • 14. A method for hearing sound produced at a site of a telepresence device, comprising: capturing sound with a number of microphones system of the telepresence device, the telepresence device including a camera system;transmitting the sound to a remote station;reproducing the sound at the remote control station; and,displaying on a monitor of the remote station a display user interface that includes a graphical element that can be used to change the number of microphones of the telepresence device from which sound is reproduced at the remote station, where the number of microphones is at least one.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising capturing the sound with a directional microphone.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising switching the camera system of the telepresence device between zoom and non-zoom modes and producing the sound captured by the directional microphone when the camera system is in the zoom mode.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, further comprising moving the telepresence device camera system and microphones in response to a command from the remote station.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein the display user interface provides a graphical depiction of an origin of sound.
US Referenced Citations (295)
Number Name Date Kind
4107689 Jellinek Aug 1978 A
4213182 Eichelberger et al. Jul 1980 A
4553309 Hess et al. Nov 1985 A
4679152 Perdue Jul 1987 A
4697278 Fleischer Sep 1987 A
4709265 Silverman et al. Nov 1987 A
4878501 Shue Nov 1989 A
5220263 Onishi et al. Jun 1993 A
5230023 Nakano Jul 1993 A
5262944 Weisner et al. Nov 1993 A
5347306 Nitta Sep 1994 A
5375195 Johnston Dec 1994 A
5400068 Ishida et al. Mar 1995 A
5413693 Redepenning May 1995 A
5436542 Petelin et al. Jul 1995 A
5511147 Abdel-Malek Apr 1996 A
5563998 Yaksich et al. Oct 1996 A
5617539 Ludwig et al. Apr 1997 A
5619341 Auyeung et al. Apr 1997 A
5623679 Rivette et al. Apr 1997 A
5675229 Thorne Oct 1997 A
5734805 Isensee et al. Mar 1998 A
5748629 Caldara et al. May 1998 A
5754631 Cave May 1998 A
5758079 Ludwig et al. May 1998 A
5787545 Colens Aug 1998 A
5793365 Tang et al. Aug 1998 A
5801755 Echerer Sep 1998 A
5844599 Hildin Dec 1998 A
5867494 Krishnaswamy et al. Feb 1999 A
5872922 Hogan et al. Feb 1999 A
5961446 Beller et al. Oct 1999 A
5995119 Cosatto et al. Nov 1999 A
6031845 Walding Feb 2000 A
6091219 Maruo et al. Jul 2000 A
6113343 Goldenberg et al. Sep 2000 A
6160582 Hill Dec 2000 A
6189034 Riddle Feb 2001 B1
6233735 Ebihara May 2001 B1
6250928 Poggio et al. Jun 2001 B1
6292714 Okabayashi Sep 2001 B1
6314631 Pryor Nov 2001 B1
6317652 Osada Nov 2001 B1
6317953 Pryor Nov 2001 B1
6324184 Hou et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324443 Kurakake et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330486 Padula Dec 2001 B1
6373855 Downing et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389329 Colens May 2002 B1
6411055 Fujita et al. Jun 2002 B1
6445964 White et al. Sep 2002 B1
6470235 Kasuga et al. Oct 2002 B2
6480762 Uchikubo et al. Nov 2002 B1
6529620 Thompson Mar 2003 B2
6567038 Granot et al. May 2003 B1
6590604 Tucker et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597392 Jenkins et al. Jul 2003 B1
6643496 Shimoyama et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667592 Jacobs et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674259 Norman et al. Jan 2004 B1
6693585 MacLeod Feb 2004 B1
6724823 Rovati et al. Apr 2004 B2
6816192 Nishikawa Nov 2004 B1
6816754 Mukai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6893267 Yueh May 2005 B1
6957712 Song et al. Oct 2005 B2
6990112 Brent et al. Jan 2006 B1
7007235 Hussein et al. Feb 2006 B1
7011538 Chang Mar 2006 B2
7015934 Toyama et al. Mar 2006 B2
RE39080 Johnston Apr 2006 E
7053578 Diehl et al. May 2006 B2
7055210 Keppler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7158861 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7164970 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167448 Wookey et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171286 Wang Jan 2007 B2
7181455 Wookey et al. Feb 2007 B2
7215786 Nakadai May 2007 B2
7219364 Bolle et al. May 2007 B2
7222000 Wang et al. May 2007 B2
7283153 Provost et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292257 Kang et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305114 Wolff et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317685 Flott et al. Jan 2008 B1
7332890 Cohen et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333642 Green Feb 2008 B2
7352153 Yan Apr 2008 B2
7363121 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B1
7400578 Guthrie et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421470 Ludwig et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430209 Porter Sep 2008 B2
7433921 Ludwig et al. Oct 2008 B2
7467211 Herman et al. Dec 2008 B1
7483867 Ansari et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492731 Hagendorf Feb 2009 B2
7510428 Obata et al. Mar 2009 B2
7523069 Friedl et al. Apr 2009 B1
7557758 Rofougaran Jul 2009 B2
7587260 Bruemmer et al. Sep 2009 B2
7587512 Ta et al. Sep 2009 B2
7590060 Miceli Sep 2009 B2
7599290 Dos Remedios et al. Oct 2009 B2
7630314 Dos Remedios et al. Dec 2009 B2
7631833 Ghaleb et al. Dec 2009 B1
7643051 Sandberg et al. Jan 2010 B2
7657560 DiRienzo Feb 2010 B1
7680038 Gourlay Mar 2010 B1
7693757 Zimmerman Apr 2010 B2
7698432 Short et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703113 Dawson Apr 2010 B2
7737993 Kaasila et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739383 Short et al. Jun 2010 B1
7756614 Jouppi Jul 2010 B2
7769705 Luechtefeld Aug 2010 B1
7774158 Domingues Goncalves et al. Aug 2010 B2
7861366 Hahm et al. Jan 2011 B2
7885822 Akers et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890382 Robb et al. Feb 2011 B2
7912583 Gutmann et al. Mar 2011 B2
7949616 Levy et al. May 2011 B2
7956894 Akers et al. Jun 2011 B2
7957837 Ziegler et al. Jun 2011 B2
7982769 Jenkins et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987069 Rodgers et al. Jul 2011 B2
8126960 Obradovich et al. Feb 2012 B2
8212533 Ota Jul 2012 B2
8265793 Cross et al. Sep 2012 B2
8287522 Moses et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292807 Perkins et al. Oct 2012 B2
8320534 Kim et al. Nov 2012 B2
8340654 Bratton et al. Dec 2012 B2
8340819 Mangaser et al. Dec 2012 B2
8348675 Dohrmann Jan 2013 B2
8374171 Cho et al. Feb 2013 B2
8400491 Panpaliya et al. Mar 2013 B1
8401275 Wang et al. Mar 2013 B2
8423284 O'Shea Apr 2013 B2
8451731 Lee et al. May 2013 B1
8463435 Herzog et al. Jun 2013 B2
8503340 Xu Aug 2013 B1
8515577 Wang et al. Aug 2013 B2
8527094 Kumar et al. Sep 2013 B2
8532860 Daly Sep 2013 B2
8610786 Ortiz Dec 2013 B2
8612051 Norman et al. Dec 2013 B2
8639797 Pan et al. Jan 2014 B1
8670017 Stuart et al. Mar 2014 B2
8726454 Gilbert et al. May 2014 B2
8836751 Ballantyne et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849679 Wang et al. Sep 2014 B2
8849680 Wright et al. Sep 2014 B2
8897920 Wang et al. Nov 2014 B2
8902278 Pinter et al. Dec 2014 B2
20010020200 Das et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010048464 Barnett Dec 2001 A1
20020027652 Paromtchik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020033880 Sul et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038168 Kasuga et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044201 Alexander et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020095239 Wallach et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106998 Presley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020109775 White et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128985 Greenwald Sep 2002 A1
20020133062 Arling et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030021107 Howell et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030050734 Lapham Mar 2003 A1
20030080901 Piotrowski May 2003 A1
20030112823 Collins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120714 Wolff et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135097 Wiederhold et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152145 Kawakita Aug 2003 A1
20030195662 Wang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212472 McKee Nov 2003 A1
20030216833 Mukai et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236590 Park et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001197 Ko et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040001676 Colgan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040008138 Hockley, Jr. et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017475 Akers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040088078 Jouppi et al. May 2004 A1
20040095516 Rohlicek May 2004 A1
20040107254 Ludwig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040107255 Ludwig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117067 Jouppi Jun 2004 A1
20040123158 Roskind Jun 2004 A1
20040150725 Taguchi Aug 2004 A1
20040168148 Goncalves et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172306 Wohl et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186623 Dooley et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040218099 Washington Nov 2004 A1
20040240981 Dothan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260790 Balloni et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004708 Goldenberg et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050060211 Xiao et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050073575 Thacher et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050125083 Kiko Jun 2005 A1
20050125098 Wang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149364 Ombrellaro Jul 2005 A1
20050152447 Jouppi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050152565 Jouppi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168568 Jouppi Aug 2005 A1
20050231586 Rodman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234592 McGee et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050264649 Chang et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286759 Zitnick et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010028 Sorensen Jan 2006 A1
20060014388 Lur et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056655 Wen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060056837 Vapaakoski Mar 2006 A1
20060066609 Iodice et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071797 Rosenfeld et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060125356 Meek, Jr. et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149418 Anvari Jul 2006 A1
20060161136 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171515 Hintermeister et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060173708 Vining et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178559 Kumar et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060178777 Park et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060224781 Tsao et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247045 Jeong et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060268704 Ansari et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271238 Choi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271400 Clements et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070025711 Marcus Feb 2007 A1
20070093279 Janik Apr 2007 A1
20070116152 Thesling May 2007 A1
20070133407 Choi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070170886 Plishner Jul 2007 A1
20070198130 Wang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226949 Hahm et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255706 Iketani et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070290040 Wurman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009969 Bruemmer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027591 Lenser et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033641 Medalia Feb 2008 A1
20080045804 Williams Feb 2008 A1
20080051985 D'Andrea et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080086241 Phillips et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091340 Milstein et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080161969 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080174570 Jobs et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201016 Finlay Aug 2008 A1
20080232763 Brady Sep 2008 A1
20080263628 Norman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267069 Thielman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080306375 Sayler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090044334 Parsell et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049640 Lee et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090086013 Thapa Apr 2009 A1
20090102919 Zamierowski et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106679 Anzures et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122699 Alperovitch et al. May 2009 A1
20090144425 Marr et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164657 Li et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171170 Li et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177323 Ziegler et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177641 Raghavan Jul 2009 A1
20090248200 Root Oct 2009 A1
20100017046 Cheung et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026239 Li et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100030578 Siddique et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051596 Diedrick et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100066804 Shoemake et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085874 Noy et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100145479 Griffiths Jun 2010 A1
20100157825 Anderlind et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100171826 Hamilton et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100228249 Mohr et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100278086 Pochiraju et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100286905 Goncalves et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100301679 Murray et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110022705 Yellamraju et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110071675 Wells et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072114 Hoffert et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110153198 Kokkas et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110193949 Nambakam et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110195701 Cook et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213210 Temby et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110280551 Sammon Nov 2011 A1
20110306400 Nguyen Dec 2011 A1
20120036484 Zhang et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059946 Wang Mar 2012 A1
20120072024 Wang et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120095352 Tran Apr 2012 A1
20120113856 Krishnaswamy May 2012 A1
20120191464 Stuart et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203731 Nelson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120291809 Kuhe et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130250938 Anandakumar et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140047022 Chan et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140085543 Hartley et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140135990 Stuart et al. May 2014 A1
20140139616 Pinter et al. May 2014 A1
20140155755 Pinter et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
1216200 May 2000 AU
1404695 Mar 2003 CN
1561923 Jan 2005 CN
1743144 Mar 2006 CN
101049017 Oct 2007 CN
101151614 Mar 2008 CN
100407729 Jul 2008 CN
1304872 Apr 2003 EP
1763243 Mar 2007 EP
1819108 Aug 2007 EP
1232610 Jan 2009 EP
2431261 Apr 2007 GB
07194609 Aug 1995 JP
11220706 Aug 1999 JP
2002321180 Nov 2002 JP
2004181229 Jul 2004 JP
2005111083 Apr 2005 JP
2007007040 Jan 2007 JP
2007232208 Sep 2007 JP
2007316966 Dec 2007 JP
2009125133 Jun 2009 JP
9742761 Nov 1997 WO
0025516 May 2000 WO
0131861 May 2001 WO
2009145958 Dec 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (61)
Entry
Fulbright et al., “SWAMI: An Autonomous Mobile Robot for Inspection of Nuclear Waste of Storage Facilities”, Autonomous Robots, vol. 2, 1995, pp. 225-235.
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. I of IV”, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A1-A6357.
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. II of IV”, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A6849-A10634.
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. III of IV”, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A10654-A15517.
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. IV of IV”, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A15677-A18127.
“Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in No. 11-CV-9185, Judge Percy Anderson”, May 9, 2014, pp. 1-48.
“Civil Minutes-General: Case No. CV 11-9185PA (AJWx), InTouch Tech., Inc. v. VGO Commons, Inc.”, Sep. 10, 2012, 7 pages.
“Google translation of: Innovations Report”, From research project to television star: Care-O-bot in ZDF series, http://www.innovations-report.de/specials/printa.php?id=5157, Sep. 28, 2001, 2 pages.
“Magne Charge”, Smart Power for Electric Vehicles, Aug. 26, 1997, 2 pages.
“MPEG File Format Summary”, downloaded from: http://www.fileformat.info/format/mpeg/egff.htm, Feb. 1, 2001, 8 pages.
“Nomad Scout User's Manual”, Nomadic Technologies, Software Version 2. 7, Part No. DOC00004, Jul. 12, 1999, pp. 1-59.
“Opening Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson”, Apr. 12, 2013, 187 pages.
“Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellee VGO Communications, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Case No. 2:11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson”, May 28, 2013, 75 pages.
“Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson”, Jun. 14, 2013, 39 pages.
“Using your Infrared Cell Phone Camera”, http://www.catsdomain.com/xray/about.htm, Courtesy of Internet Wayback Machine, Jan. 30, 2010, 4 pages.
Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680044698.0, issued Nov. 4, 2010, 26 pages.
ACM Digital Library Record, “Autonomous Robots vol. 11 Issue 1”, downloaded from <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=591550&picked=prox&cfid=360891374&cftoken=35225929>, Jul. 2001, 2 pages.
Activemedia, Inc.,, “Saphira Software Manual”, Saphira Version 5.3, ActiveMedia, Inc., 1997, 105 pages.
Activmedia Robotics, “Pioneer 2/PeopleBot TM”, Operations Manual , Version 9, Oct. 2001, 78 pages.
Adams, “Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB'02)”, Mobile Robotics Research Group, The Seventh International Conference, retrieved on Jan. 22, 2014, available at: http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/groups/mrg/MRG.html, Aug. 4-11, 2002, 1 page.
Apple Inc., “I Phone”, iPhone Series, XP002696350, Sep. 21, 2012, pp. 1-29.
Bradner, “The Internet Standards Process—Revision 3”, Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2026, BCP: 9, Obsoletes: 1602, Category: Best Current Practice, Oct. 1996, pp. 1-36.
Brenner, “A technical tutorial on the IEEE 802.11 protocol”, BreezeCOM Wireless Communications, 1997, pp. 1-24.
Christensen, et al., “BeeSoft User's Guide and Reference”, Robots for the Real World™, Real World Interface, Inc ., Sep. 26, 1997, 203 pages.
CMU Course 16X62, “Robot user's manual”, (describing the Nomad Scout), Carnegie Mellon University, Feb. 1, 2001, 11 pages.
Evans, et al., “The Trackless Robotic Courier”, PYXIS HelpMate®, 3 pages.
Gaidioz, et al., “Synchronizing Network Probes to Avoid Measurement Intrusiveness with the Network Weather Service”, Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on High-Performance Distributed Computing,, 2000, pp. 147-154.
Garner, et al., “The Application of Telepresence in Medicine”, BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, No. 4, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 181-187.
Goldenberg, et al., “Telemedicine in Otolaryngology”, American Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 23,No. 1, 2002, pp. 35-43.
Gostai, “Gostai Jazz: Robotic Telepresence”, Available online at <http://www.gostai.com>, 4 pages.
Jacobs, et al., “Applying Telemedicine to Outpatient Physical Therapy”, AMIA, Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2002, 1 page.
Koenen, “MPEG-4: a Powerful Standard for Use in Web and Television Environments”, (KPN Research), downloaded from http://www.w3.org/Architecture/1998/06/Workshop/paper26, Jul. 1, 1998, 4 pages.
Kurlowicz, et al., “The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)”, Try This: Best Practices in Nursing Care to Older Adults, A series from the Hartford Institute of Geriatric Nursing, Issue No. 3, Jan. 1999, 2 pages.
Leifer, et al., “VIPRR: A Virtually in Person Rehabilitation Robot”, Proceedings of 1997 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Apr. 14-15, 1997, 4 pages.
Lemaire, “Using Communication Technology to Enhance Rehabilitation Services: A Solution Oriented User Manual”, Institute for Rehabilitation Research and Development, Terry Fox Mobile Clinic, The Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Version 2.0; http://www.irrd.ca/telehealth/distfile/distman—v2—1.pdf, 1998-2001, 104 pages.
Library of Congress, “008—Fixed-Length Data Elements (NR)”, MARC 21 Format for Classification Data, downloaded from http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/cd008.html, Jan. 2000, pp. 1-14.
Minsky, “Telepresence”, OMNI Magazine, Jun. 1980, 6 pages.
Nakazato, et al., “Group-Based Interface for Content-Based Image Retrieval”, Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 2002, pp. 187-194.
Nakazato, et al., “ImageGrouper: A Group-Oriented User Interface for Content-Based Image Retrieval and Digital Image Arrangement”, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol. 14, No. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 45-46.
North, “Telemedicine: Sample Script and Specifications for a Demonstration of Simple Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Using Live Two-Way Video on a Computer Network”, Greenstar Corporation, 1998, 5 pages.
Osborn, “Quality of Life Technology Center”, QoLT Research Overview:A National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University of Pittsburgh, 2 pages.
Panusopone, et al., “Performance comparison of MPEG-4 and H.263+ for streaming video applications”, Circuits Systems Signal Processing, vol. 20, No. 3, 2001, pp. 293-309.
Paulos, et al., “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Chapter 9 in Goldberg, et al., ed. “Beyond webcams”, MIT Press, Jan. 4, 2002, pp. 155-167.
Paulos, “Personal tele-embodiment”, OskiCat Catalog Record, UCB Library Catalog, 2001, 3 pages.
Paulos, “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Introductory and cover pages from 2001 Dissertation including Contents table, together with e-mails relating thereto from UC Berkeley Libraries, as shelved at UC Berkeley Engineering Library (Northern Regional library Facility), May 8, 2002, 25 pages, including 4 pages of e-mails.
Paulos, et al., “Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence”, Autonomous Robots, vol. 11, Issue 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Jul. 2001, pp. 87-95.
Piquepaille, “This Blog and its RSS Feed are Moving”, Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends, How new technologies are modifying our way of life,, Oct. 31, 2004, 2 pages.
Radvision, “Making Sense of Bandwidth the NetsenseWay”, Network Congestion in Unmanaged Networks Bandwidth Estimation and Adaptation Techniques,White Paper, Radvision's Netsense Technology, 2010, 7 pages.
Reynolds, et al., “Review of Robotic Telemedicine Utilization in Intensive Care Units (ICUs)”, 11th Annual ATA Symposium, Tampa, Florida, 2011, 1 page.
Roy, et al., “Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly”, Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (Wire 2000), vol. 25, http://www.ri.cmu.edu/pb—files/pub2/roy—nicholas—2000—1/roy—nicholas—2000—1.pdf, Apr. 30-May 1, 2000, 7 pages.
Schraft, et al., “Care-O-bot™: the concept of a system fro assisting elderly or disabled persons in home enviornments”, IEEE Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, IECON '98, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2476-2481.
Screenshot Showing Google Date for Lemaire Telehealth Manual, Screenshot Retrieved on Dec. 18, 2014, 1 page.
Nomadic Technologies, Inc., “Nomad Scout Language Reference Manual”, Software Version: 2.7, Part No. DOC00002, Jul. 12, 1999, 47 pages.
Telepresence Research, Inc., “The Telepresence Mobile Robot System”, Available at: http://www.telepresence.com/telepresence-research/TELEROBOT/, Retrieved on Nov. 23, 2010, Feb. 20, 1995, 3 pages.
Theodosiou et al., “MuLVAT: A Video Annotation Tool Based on XML-Dictionaries and Shot Clustering”, Part II, 19th International Conference, Artificial Neural Networks-ICANN 2009, Sep. 14-17, 2009, pp. 913-922.
Tipsuwan, et al., “Gain Adaptation of Networked Mobile Robot to Compensate QoS Deterioration”, 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, Nov. 5-8, 2002, pp. 3146-3151.
Tsui et al., “Exploring Use Cases for Telepresence Robots”, 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Mar. 2011, pp. 11-18.
Tyrrell, et al., “Teleconsultation in Psychology: The Use of Videolinks for Interviewing and Assessing Elderly Patients”, Age and Ageing, vol. 30, No. 3, May 2001, pp. 191-195.
UMASS Lowell Robotics Lab, “Robotics Lab @ UMASS Lowell”, Brochure, 2011, 2 pages.
Video Middleware Cookbook, “H.350 Directory Services for Multimedia”, Video Middleware Group, 2 pages.
Weaver et al., “Monitoring and Controlling Using the Internet and Java”, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 1152-1158.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150012136 A1 Jan 2015 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13432418 Mar 2012 US
Child 14483049 US
Parent 12148464 Apr 2008 US
Child 13432418 US