This application is a national stage of PCT/EP02/02053 filed Feb. 27, 2002 and based upon DE 101 10 176.7 filed Mar. 2, 2001 under the International Convention.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns a mobile working machine, in particular a mobile concrete pump with a chassis, with two forward and two rearward support struts extendable out from a transport position into at least one supporting position and each preferably supportable upon a surface by a telescopic supporting jack, with a working boom, preferably a concrete distribution boom, which can be extended out of a transport position and into working positions that project beyond the chassis and which can rotate about a vertical axis fixed relative to the chassis, with sensors or measurement devices in the area of the support jacks for determining the respective support load and with a support safety monitoring device receiving the output signals from the sensors or measuring devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
Mobile working machines of this type are provided with extendable support struts, which are intended to enhance the stability of the working device at the location of employment. The support struts have for their part the task of removing the spring-support of the vehicle and to remove the load from the wheels. On the other hand, the support struts are designed to minimize the danger of tipping, which result when high tip moments are produced by the working boom. The support feet of the support struts thereby form the corners of a quadrilateral, of which the side edges define a surface within which the center of gravity of the work device must lie, in order to guarantee a stable stance. Since the projecting work boom is rotatable, the center of gravity describes a full circle during turning, which must lie within the quadrilateral over the work area of the work boom. Since the space in construction sites may be confining, it is often not possible to completely extend the support struts. Thereby the freedom of rotation of the work boom becomes limited. In order to ensure the tip-over safety, safety-monitoring devices have been proposed. Therein pressures existing in the four hydraulic operated telescopes of the support legs are monitored. If the pressure drops off in two support leg cylinders, then the boom movement and the concrete pump are switched off. This technique can also be used in the case that the machine, for space reasons, is not fully supported (periodical BETON June 1996, page 362, 364). Research has however shown that pressure measurements in the telescoping cylinders of the support legs are not sufficient for a reliable monitoring of the support legs. This applies above all when one of the telescoping cylinders rests upon an abutment. Further, dynamic support effects cannot be detected with this monitoring system.
Beginning therewith, it is the task of the present invention to improve the stance safety monitoring of mobile work devices with respect to their precision and employability in complicated support strut situations.
The solution of this task is proposed in accordance with the combination of characteristics set forth in patent claim 1. Advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention can be seen from the dependent claims.
The inventive solution is based primarily upon the idea, that at least one force sensor is provided in each support foot, that each force sensor is associated with an electronic measuring circuit for providing a support load dependent measurement signal, and that the monitoring device includes an evaluation electronic, which in predetermined sensing cycles is acted upon with the support foot related support load measurement values and for their comparison with at least one predetermined stability determining threshold value. The inventive arrangement makes possible a real-time monitoring of the support load in the area of the individual support feet in a narrow time frame, such that dynamic effects and carrier or load effects during operation of the work device can be included during monitoring.
It is envisioned in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention that the evaluation electronic includes a software routine for the determining of the second lowest support foot related support load measurement value of each work cycle and includes a stability determining threshold value for comparison therewith. Therein consideration is given to the recognition that with consideration of the static indeterminacy of the four-point support, generally a three-point support is employed, which results in changing support configurations during movement of the work boom. One of the support legs can therein even lift off from the substrate, without endangering the tip stability. Determinative for the stance safety is, in accordance with the invention, always the second-lowest support foot related support load measured value. If this falls below a minimal force with declining tendency, then an emergency turning off of the boom movement and the pump operation is indicated. The therefore determinative threshold value provider is set for example to a minimal force of 0.5 to 5% of the support leg related maximal force. The invention makes it possible besides this to emit an advance warning prior to reaching the mentioned danger area. In accordance therewith a further threshold value provider is provided for providing an advance warning force, which lies for example at 5 to 10% of the support leg related maximal load and which signals the pump operator for example via an acoustic and/or optical signal that an elevated degree of caution is necessary. It is basically also possible to use the monitoring device for emergency direct shutting off of the work boom and/or the concrete pump.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention it is envisioned that in each support foot two preferably identical force sensors are provided, which are provided in measuring circuits independent of each other for providing a support load dependent measurement signals. Therein the evaluation electronic preferably includes a software routine for the pair-wise comparison of the measurement values derived from the support foot related measurement signals with respect to their agreeing or not agreeing. A further processing within the evaluation electronic is possible only when the measurement values associated with the individual support feet are jointly in agreement within a predetermined tolerance range. The redundancy of the measuring system resulting therefrom is necessary in order to ensure a reliable monitoring of the stability of the equipment.
The force sensors preferably include a strain measurement strip or a piezoelectric element. The electrical measurement circuit preferably includes a bridge switch, in which one branch of the associated force sensor is provided and of which the output is connected to an operation amplifier.
Since in stability control the most important thing is a comparison of the measured support load relevant measurement values with predetermined threshold values, it is proposed in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention that the electronic measurement circuit is adjusted to an elevated measurement precision in the measurement range which includes the threshold value. Since the stability determining threshold values are to be found primarily at the lower end of the support load scale, it is of advantage, when the electrical measurement circuit includes a measurement precision which increases going from higher to lower support foot related support loads. It has been found to be particularly advantageous when the electrical measurement circuit is adjusted to an elevated measurement precision in a measurement range below 30%, preferably below 15% of the support foot related maximal load.
In order to avoid breaking through the surface of the ground, it can also be necessary in critical ground relationships, to include an upper threshold value. This threshold value is preferably so selected that with a given support surface a ground penetration does not occur.
A further preferred embodiment of the invention envisions that the force sensor is provided on a foot element that can be preferably retrofitted to a support foot. In this case it is also possible that the measurement circuit and in certain cases a part of the evaluation electronic be integrated into this foot element. The measurement circuit is therein preferably coupled via a galvanic or wireless signal transmission path with the evaluation electronic.
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail on the basis of an illustrative embodiment shown in the figures. There is shown
a and b a top view onto the support arrangement of the mobile concrete pump according to
a a side view of a support foot of a support strut with attached support load sensor in sectional representation;
b a section through a support foot of a support strut with integrated support load sensor;
a a schematic of a support foot with redundant support load sensors;
b a circuit diagram of the redundant support load sensor with evaluation electronic.
The mobile concrete pump shown in
The four support feet supported on the ground VL (forward left), VR (forward right), HL (rearward left) and HR (rearward right) define a quadrilateral, of which the sides l, r, v and h (left, right, forward and rearward) respectively define tip-over boundary lines. For ensuring a safe stance, the four boundary lines cannot be exceeded by the center of gravity of the system during outwards extension of the work boom. The invention makes use of the recognition, that the position of the center of gravity within the tip-over quadrilateral can be monitored by support load sensors at the support feet 26 forming the four corners of the tip-over quadrilateral. In accordance therewith a sensor unit 30 is provided in each support foot 26, which includes two force sensors 32, 34 with associated electronic measurement circuitry 36, 38 and operation amplifiers 40, 42. Each measurement circuit 36, 38 provides via its amplifier 40, 42 a measurement signal correlated with the support load sensed in predetermined sampling cycles, which are processed in a central evaluation electronic 54.
Only when the measurement values sensed by the two measurement circuits 36, 38 of one support foot 26 correspond within a predetermined deviation tolerance are they supplied to a subsequent evaluation. In accordance therewith the evaluation electronic 54 includes a software routine 60 for the pair-wise comparison of the measurement values derived from the support foot related measurement signals with respect to their correspondence. When this correspondence is not present in multiple sampling cycles, this indicates a measurement or electronic error, which leads to a emergency turning off of the system and therewith to a placing out of operation of the mobile concrete pump.
A further characteristic of the evaluation electronic 54 is comprised therein, that it includes a software routine 62 for the determination of the second lowest support foot related support load measurement value of each sampling cycle and for the comparison thereof with a stability determining threshold value. Therein consideration is given to the recognition, that a support construction 15 with four support feet 26 is statically over-defined, so that in each constellation of the work boom 14 only three of the four support foot related measurement values are of relevance for the stance stability. The stance stability is basically given when at three support feet 26 a support load still is present, which exceeds the predetermined minimal force. Following the extension of the support struts 20, 24 in the normal case the measured support load in all support feet 26 is greater than a predetermined advance warning force. If the work boom 14 is moved, then one support foot 26 can even completely lift from the ground without risking stability. A warning (acoustic/optic) is only given when the support load in the one of the three other support feet 26 drops below the advance warning force. If the load on the concerned support foot drops further and if its support load drops below a predetermined minimal force, the movement of the work boom 14 and the operation of the concrete pump are switched off by interruption of the hydraulic pressure supply via a emergency off valve 56. In this condition the operator can in an emergency operation, accompanied by an acoustic horn signal, retract the work boom 14 out of the danger area under his own responsibility. An omni-directional light 58 can also be used to pre-warn the operator of the condition. In the manually operated retraction process, the turning off of the omni-directional light 58 indicates that the support load at three support feet 26 has once again exceeded the minimal force.
As can be seen from
As can be seen from
It is basically possible to convert the measurement range of the measurement circuit, so that also the maximal load can be measured.
In summary the following can be concluded: The invention relates to a mobile working machine, particularly a mobile concrete pump, comprising a device for monitoring the stability thereof when in operation. The working machine comprises a chassis 10, which contains a supporting structure with two front and two rear support struts 20. The support struts can be extended out of a driving position and into at least one supporting position and each can be supported on a surface 28 by a telescopic supporting jack 26. The working machine additionally comprises a working boom 14, which can be extended out of a driving position and into working positions that project beyond the support struts, which can rotate about a vertical axis that is fixed with regard to the support struts, and which is preferably a concrete distribution boom. Measuring devices for determining the respective supporting load are arranged in the area of the supporting jacks and their output signals are sent to a device for monitoring stability. According to the invention, at least one force sensor 32, 34 is arranged in each supporting jack and is connected in an electrical measuring circuit 36, 38 for outputting a supporting load-dependent measurement signal. The monitoring device comprises an evaluation electronic unit 54 which, in predetermined sampling cycles, can be subjected to the action of supporting load measured values and, for their comparison, can be subjected to the action of at least one predetermined stability-determining threshold value.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 10 176 | Mar 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/02053 | 2/27/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/28/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/075076 | 9/26/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2980414 | Perry, Jr. et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
3072209 | Perry, Jr. | Jan 1963 | A |
3277718 | Ruge | Oct 1966 | A |
3680714 | Holmes | Aug 1972 | A |
3712294 | Muller | Jan 1973 | A |
3713129 | Buchholz | Jan 1973 | A |
4135392 | Young | Jan 1979 | A |
4546658 | Rocha et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4833615 | Bitner et al. | May 1989 | A |
5214967 | Grogan | Jun 1993 | A |
5557526 | Anderson | Sep 1996 | A |
5568132 | Pratt | Oct 1996 | A |
5677488 | Monahan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5691697 | Carvalho et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6170341 | Avitan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202013 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6555766 | Breed et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 531 166 | Dec 1969 | DE |
24 36 849 | Feb 1976 | DE |
29 48 774 | Jun 1980 | DE |
22 30 546 | Apr 1981 | DE |
36 05 462 | Aug 1987 | DE |
38 07 966 | Jul 1991 | DE |
197 30 436 | Jun 1998 | DE |
197 16 521 | Oct 1998 | DE |
198 57 298 | Jun 2000 | DE |
100 08 514 | Dec 2000 | DE |
0 531 828 | Aug 1992 | EP |
1 389 139 | Jun 1973 | GB |
2 037 444 | Dec 1979 | GB |
2 187 432 | Sep 1987 | GB |
59106351 | Jun 1984 | JP |
2001106480 | Apr 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040119597 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |