1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for video coding. More particularly, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for determining transforms for residual coding.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the ongoing standardization of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), alternative transforms to the standard Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) are being proposed for intra-prediction residuals. These transforms can broadly be categorized as either training-based transforms or model-based transforms. Prominent amongst the training based transforms is the Mode-Dependent Directional Transforms (MDDT). In MDDT, a large training set of error residuals is collected for each intra-prediction mode and then the optimal transform matrix is computed using the residual training set. However, MDDT requires a large number of transform matrices (e.g., up to 18 at block sizes of N=4 and 8). The model-based transform assumes that the video signal is modeled as a first order Gauss-Markov process and then the optimal transform is derived analytically. These model based transforms require only 2 transform matrices at a block size.
A Discrete Sine Transform (DST) Type-7, with frequency and phase components different from the conventional DCT, has been derived for the first-order Gauss-Markov model when the boundary information is available in one direction, as in intra prediction in the H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC) standard. It has also been shown that if prediction is not performed along a particular direction, then DCT performs close to the optimal Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT). The idea was applied to the vertical and horizontal modes in intra-prediction in H.264/AVC and a combination of the proposed DST Type 7 and conventional DCT has been used adaptively. The combination of DST and DCT has also been applied to other prediction modes in H.264/AVC and it has been shown that there is only a minor loss in performance in comparison to MDDT. For example, DST has been applied for various modes in Unified Intra Directional Prediction for HEVC. In some cases however, an additional set of quantization and inverse quantization tables were necessary. In other cases, there were 2 different implementations for DCT. In still other cases, no additional set of quantization or inverse quantization tables were used and only a single implementation of DCT was used but there were no fast implementations for the DST-Type 7 transform matrices and full matrix multiplication was used to perform the DST operations for the DST and inverse DST matrices.
To overcome the shortcoming of full matrix multiplication for appropriately scaled DST Type 7 (i.e., in order to retain the same set of quantization and inverse quantization matrices), a fast DST implementation for the 4×4 DST was presented in which the forward DST took 9 multiplications while the inverse DST used only 8 multiplications.
However, the 8×8 DST transform does not provide significant gains for all the intra prediction modes for Unified Intra Directional Prediction for HEVC. The primary reason is that for oblique modes (i.e., modes other than vertical and horizontal), DST may not be the optimal transform at block sizes larger than 4×4. Hence, there is a need to devise optimal transforms for intra prediction residues for block sizes of 8×8 and higher.
Further, a 4-point secondary transform has been designed by smoothing a correlation matrix for the intra prediction residues (with ρ=1) at size 8, and taking only the top 4×4 portion of the 8×8 correlation matrix. The derived 4-point secondary transform was then applied for blocks of sizes 8×8, 16×16 and 32×32. However, this transform was not optimal for block-sizes of 16×16 and 32×32 since it was only designed for blocks of size 8×8 and re-used at the other block sizes. Hence, there is a need to derive optimal transforms that work well for all the block sizes (e.g., 8×8, 16×16, 32×32) and possibly higher.
Also, in general, a 2-d secondary transform is applied once the 2-d primary transform (e.g., DCT) finishes. This implies that the overhead (in terms of latency) would be approximately equal to the ratio of cycles for the secondary transform to the cycles for the primary transform. But for a practical implementation, the latency of secondary transform should be low. Hence, there is a need for different low-latency architectures for secondary transform after the primary transform.
Aspects of the present invention are to address at least the above-mentioned problems and/or disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described below.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a method for encoding video data is provided. The method includes determining a primary transform CN for application to residual data, determining a secondary transform TrK for application to the residual data, applying the primary transform CN to the residual data, and selectively applying the secondary transform TrK to the residual data, wherein N denotes the length size of the input vector on which the primary transform CN is applied, and K denotes the length of the first few coefficients of the primary transform output on which the secondary transform TrK is applied.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for encoding video data is provided. The apparatus includes a primary transform unit for determining a primary transform CN for application to residual data and for applying the primary transform CN to the residual data, and a secondary transform unit for determining a secondary transform TrK for application to the residual data, and for selectively applying the secondary transform TrK to the residual data, wherein N denotes the length size of the input vector on which the primary transform CN is applied, and K denotes the length of the first few coefficients of the primary transform output on which the secondary transform TrK is applied.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for decoding video data is provided. The method includes determining an inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) for application to residual data, determining an inverse primary transform inv(CN) for application to the residual data or an output of an inverse secondary transform unit, selectively applying the inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) to the residual data, and applying the inverse primary transform inv(CN) to the residual data, wherein N denotes the length size of the input residual vector on which the inverse primary transform inv(CN) is applied, and K denotes the length of the first few coefficients of the input residual data on which the inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) is applied.
In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for decoding video data is provided. The apparatus includes an inverse secondary transform unit for determining an inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) for application to residual data, and for selectively applying the inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) to the residual data, and an inverse primary transform unit for determining an inverse primary transform inv(CN) for application to the residual data or an output of the inverse secondary transform unit and for applying the inverse primary transform inv(CN) to the residual data or the output of the inverse secondary transform unit, wherein N denotes the length size of the input residual vector on which the inverse primary transform inv(CN) is applied, and K denotes the length of the first few coefficients of the input residual data on which the inverse secondary transform inv(TrK) is applied.
Other aspects, advantages, and salient features of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses exemplary embodiments of the invention.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Throughout the drawings, it should be noted that like reference numbers are used to depict the same or similar elements, features, and structures.
The following description with reference to the accompanying drawings is provided to assist in a comprehensive understanding of exemplary embodiments of the invention as defined by the claims and their equivalents. It includes various specific details to assist in that understanding but these are to be regarded as merely exemplary. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. In addition, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions are omitted for clarity and conciseness.
The terms and words used in the following description and claims are not limited to the bibliographical meanings, but, are merely used by the inventor to enable a clear and consistent understanding of the invention. Accordingly, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the following description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention are provided for illustration purpose only and not for the purpose of limiting the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
It is to be understood that the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a component surface” includes reference to one or more of such surfaces.
By the term “substantially” it is meant that the recited characteristic, parameter, or value need not be achieved exactly, but that deviations or variations, including for example, tolerances, measurement error, measurement accuracy limitations and other factors known to those of skill in the art, may occur in amounts that do not preclude the effect the characteristic was intended to provide.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention include several innovative concepts not previously disclosed. First, an exemplary apparatus and method for determining a low complexity secondary transform for residual coding that re-uses a primary alternate transform to improve compression efficiency is provided. Second, an exemplary apparatus and method is provided for deriving secondary transforms from a primary alternate transform when a correlation coefficient in a covariance matrix of intra residues in a Gauss-Markov model is varied. Third, an exemplary apparatus and method for reducing the latency of the secondary transform are also presented. Finally, an exemplary apparatus and method for improving compression efficiency by using a 4×4 Discrete Sine Transform for Chroma is provided. Each of the novel innovations will described in turn below.
1. Low Complexity Secondary Transform from Primary Alternate Transform
In order to improve compression efficiency, alternate primary transforms, other than the conventional Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), can be applied at block sizes of 8×8, 16×16 and 32×32. However, these alternate primary transforms will have the same size as the block size. In general, when these alternate primary transforms are used with higher block sizes, such as 32×32, they may only have marginal gains that do not justify the cost of supporting an additional 32×32 transform.
Referring to
Next, an example is provided to illustrate that a primary alternate transform and a secondary transform are mathematically equivalent.
Referring to
In Equation (1), S denotes the DST or alternate primary transform 201, N denotes the block size (e.g., N×N), and i,j are the row and column indices of the 2-d DST matrix. Furthermore, though not a variable in Equation (1), C denotes the conventional DCT Type-2 or primary transform 203.
Based on the mapping for intra prediction modes, or, in general, the direction of prediction, either the primary transform 203 (e.g., DCT (i.e., C)) or the alternate primary transform 201 (e.g., DST (i.e., S)) along a direction for a particular mode can be applied as is illustrated in
Now, if Tr=C−1*S, and I is an Identity matrix, the application of the Mode-Dependent DCT/DST (respectively C/S) illustrated in
Referring to
From the above analysis, it is clear that, mathematically, the application of an alternate primary transform in
1.2 Steps for Finding a Secondary Transform from an Alternate Primary Transform
An example is now provided regarding the determination of a secondary transform from an alternate primary transform at a size of 8×8. However, the procedure is applicable at any size N×N.
It is assumed that at a size of N×N, N-point DCT and DST are used as alternate primary transforms. For notation purposes, S is appended with the input block-length N to denote N-point DST (i.e., SN). At size 8×8, one can derive an alternate primary transform S8 or can apply Tr8 defined as C8T S8.
Now, let X be the input. The 8×8 correlation matrix M1 can be determined as:
Let Y=C8T*X be the DCT output for the input X. Then, the covariance matrix for Y is given by M2=C8T*M1*C8.
For the floating point 8×8 DCT, with basis vectors in columns, C8 is determined as:
and C8T is determined as:
thus, with M2=C8T*M1*C8, M2 is determined as:
The KLT for this matrix can be found as [A,B]=eig(M2), wherein A is determined as:
and B is determined as:
The transposition of A (i.e., AT) is then rounded and normalized by 128 (i.e., round(AT*128)) which results in:
It is further noted that E=round(C8T*S8*128)T which is determined as:
where the DST Type 7 matrix S8 is:
and S8T is determined as:
In the above matrix E, the basis vectors are along columns. Hence, ignoring the sign of the basis vectors (i.e., if m is a basis vector, so is −m), it can be concluded that A=ET=C8T*S8 is a secondary matrix Tr based on the earlier definition of Tr=CT*S.
The above analysis shows that there is one-to-one mathematical equivalence between a primary alternate transform and a secondary transform.
It could be argued that because both of these mathematically equivalent techniques of applying a primary alternate transform and applying a secondary transform, for example at size 8×8, require another 8×8 matrix in addition to 8-point DCT C8, neither provides an advantage over the other. Additionally, the secondary transform as in
For example, the same 8×8 matrix A can be used again as a secondary matrix for the 8×8 lowest frequency band following the 16×16 and 32×32 DCT. This results in several advantages. For example, there is no need for additional storage at larger blocks (e.g., 16×16 and higher) for storing any of the new alternate or secondary transforms. Further, B=C4T*S4 can be used as a 4×4 secondary transform at all block sizes of 8×8 and higher, which can be derived from the DCT and DST at block sizes of 4×4. At a block size of 4×4, it would be beneficial to apply S4 directly so as to minimize the number of operations.
In an exemplary implementation, B, in which the basis vector is normalized by 128, is derived as illustrated below.
B (shifted by 7 bits)=round (C4T*S4) with norm scaled to 128, which is determined as:
Based on a DCT operation, C4 may be determined as:
and B would then be round(C4T*S), which is determined as:
If S1 is already 7-bit rounded DST in High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) test Model (HM) 3.0, it is determined as:
then B could also be found as round(C4T*S1/128), which is determined as:
Also, for a case of (28,56) approximate DST, then S2 is determined as:
And B=round(C4T*S2/128) is determined as:
It is noted that the application of B as a secondary transform at all block-sizes makes the design very consistent. Also, B can be applied as a cascade of the transforms C4T and S, via two consecutive matrices. If that is the case, the number of multiplications (mults) required would be only mults (DCT4×4)+mults (Sin4×4) rather than full matrix multiplication (i.e., 16 for a 4×4 case).
In the current HM, the number of multiplications for DST is 8, and (28,56) DST has 5 multiplications. A 4×4 point DCT using a butterfly structure can be applied using 4*log(4) mults=8 mults, and hence the total would be 13 mults for implementation of B, which is less than full matrix multiplication. Also, there would be no requirement of any new transform in that case. Such a procedure is applicable even if the DCT at size 4×4 or DST at size 4×4 changes in the future, or if DST is replaced by a new 4×4 KLT.
It is also noted that the covariance matrix M for an intra block with dimension 8, along which the prediction is performed, can be changed. For example, the covariance matrix M may be changed to allow for smoothness for higher order blocks. In that case, M1,new may be determined as:
Then, M2,new=C8T*M1,new*C8, which is determined as:
The KLT for M2 may be determined as [P,Q]=eig(M2), wherein P is determined as:
Q is determined as:
and T2=round(PT*128), which is determined as,
can also be used as a secondary transform. Of course, this is merely an example and it should be understood that the above procedure can be applied with any covariance matrix which has similar characteristics such as M3 which is determined as:
where the slope of the diagonal unique elements in M3 is varied in a different fashion.
For deriving an 8-point transform (e.g., vertical transform after vertical prediction on intra blocks with vertical dimension of 8), the following covariance matrix M1,new may be used after smoothing as described in Section 1.4, where M1,new is determined as:
The above correlation matrix may be denoted as R8=M1,new for notational simplicity, where the sub-script denotes the dimension 8 corresponding to the input vector length.
A correlation matrix for intra 4×4 blocks for deriving an optimal transform is shown by R4 below.
Noting the similarity between R8 and R4, the following Equation (2), including smoothing for term (i,j) of the N×N matrix of intra prediction residue block RN, is proposed.
p=min(i,j)
R
N(i,j)=1+(p−1)/(N/4) Equation (2)
It is noted that in Equation (2), the slope factor (p−1)/(N/4) can be generalized to β(p−1)/(N/4). In that case, β, which is a positive real number, can further control the slope for smoothing the elements of the correlation matrix RN. Possible values of β include 0.6, 0.8, 1.2, etc.
It is also noted that all the correlation matrices R4, R8, R16, R32 are simply special cases of the above N×N matrix RN. For example, the R16 matrix would be determined as:
And the R32 matrix would be determined as:
Although not illustrated, R48 or R64 can be calculated in a similar fashion.
Referring to
In step 403, the matrix for the top K rows and left-most K columns VK,N=UN (1:K,1:K) is obtained where the sub-scripts K and N in VK,N denote that VK,N is obtained from the K top rows and K left columns of N×N correlation matrix UN.
In step 405, the KLT of VK,N of dimension K×K denoted as WK,N is determined. The resulting matrix WK,N is a secondary matrix of dimension K that can be used following the DCT as a K-point transform for the first K elements of the N-point DCT output.
Finally, in step 407, in case an integer based approximation of WK,N with m-bit precision (defined as YK,N) is required, WK,N is multiplied by 2m and then the matrix elements are rounded to the nearest integer, i.e., YK,N=round (2m*WK,N).
The following example illustrates derivation of an 8×8 secondary transform YK,N with 7-bit precision from R32 using the process illustrated in
Then, in accordance with step 401, the correlation matrix U32=C32T*R32*C32, is determined as:
Next, per step 403, V8,32 is obtained as the top 8×8 portion of the matrix U32, i.e., V8,32=U32 (1:8,1:8), which is determined as:
In accordance with step 405, the KLT of V8,32, (i.e., W8,32=KLT (V8,32), is determined as:
Finally, for the integer approximation of step 407, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y8,32=round (128*W8,32), which is determined as:
where the basis vectors are along the rows in Y8,32.
The following examples illustrate determinations of secondary 2×2 to 7×7 matrices obtained from the original 32×32 matrix in accordance with the procedure of
V2,32=U32 (1:2,1:2) is determined as:
The KLT of V2,32 (i.e., W2,32=KLT (V2,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y2,32=round (128*W2,32), which is determined as:
V3,32=(U32 1:3,1:3) is determined as:
The KLT of V3,32 (i.e., W3,32=KLT (V3,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y3,32=round (128*W3,32), which is determined as:
V4,32=U32 (1:4,1:4) is determined as:
The KLT of V4,32 (i.e., W4,32=KLT (V4,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y4,32=round (128*W4,32), which is determined as:
V5,32=U32 (1:5,1:5) is determined as:
The KLT of V5,32 (i.e., W5,32=KLT (V5,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y5,32=round (128*W5,32), which is determined as:
V6,32=U32 (1:6,1:6) is determined as:
The KLT of V6,32 (i.e., W6,32=KLT (V6,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y6,32=round (128*W6,32), which is determined as:
V7,32=U32 (1:7,1:7) is determined as:
The KLT of V7,32 (i.e., W7,32=KLT (V7,32)) is determined as:
For the integer approximation, multiplication is made by 27=128, and the resulting elements are rounded in the matrix Y7,32=round (128*W7,32), which is determined as:
It is noted that the above process can be extended in a straightforward fashion for the derivation of any K×K secondary transform from an N×N correlation matrix RN.
Finally, it is noted that a K×K secondary transform can be applied to block sizes other than N×N. For example, an 8×8 secondary transform designed for 32×32 input can also be applied as the secondary transform on 8×8 and 16×16 square blocks, as well as rectangular blocks such as 8×16, 16×8, 8×32, 32×8 etc. The advantage of using an 8×8 secondary transform Y8,32 designed using 32×32 to other block sizes would be that no additional transform would be used (such as Y8,16: 8×8 secondary matrix designed using 16×16 correlation matrix, etc.).
1.7 Secondary Transform from a Combination of Two Correlation Matrices:
It is noted that the above procedure would yield an optimal secondary transform for the first K-points of N-point input data. For example, Y8,8, Y8,16 and Y8,32 would respectively be the optimal 8×8 transforms for V8,8, V8,16 and V8,32, i.e., the top 8 rows, and leftmost 8 columns of the original correlation matrices U8=C8T*R8*C8, U16=C16T*R16*C16 and U32=C32T*R32*C32 respectively.
However, if it is necessary to design one matrix for all the correlation matrices of sizes 8×8, 16×16 and 32×32, a probabilistic distribution must be assumed when the input would be 8-point (i.e., corresponding to an 8×8 correlation matrix U8), 16-point, or 32-point. In the following analysis, p8, p16, and p32 respectively denote the probability of an input being 8-point, 16-point and 32-point. Of course, this is only for illustration and the input can be any N-point, where N is an integer greater than or equal to K.
Obtaining a new correlation matrix (for the example case of input being either 8-point, 16-point or 32-point) would include using Equation (3) to determine V8,Avg.
V
8,Avg
=p
8
V
8,8,Normalized
+p
16
V
8,16,Normalized
+p
32
V
8,32,Normalized Equation (3)
In Equation (3), V8,8,Normalized=(⅛) V8,8, V8,16,Normalized=( 1/16) V8,16, and V8,32,Normalized=( 1/32) V8,32. Note that the (⅛) factor for normalizing V8,8 is due to the normalization coming from an 8×8 DCT. In general, an N×N DCT CN has a sqrt (1/N) factor in it, and, after multiplying by the correlation matrix RN of size N×N, N elements are added. This implies that the resulting coefficients of the matrix RN*CN have a factor of sqrt(1/N)*N=sqrt(N) in the numerator which requires normalization. Hence, it is necessary to divide the matrix RN*CN appropriately by sqrt (N). If the multiplication is performed from the left as well, an additional division by sqrt (N) is necessary, or equivalently for CNT*RN*CN, division by a factor of 1/N is necessary.
In the general case, VK,Avg can be given by Equation (4):
where the secondary transform is applied on the first K-points, ‘i’ is the running index for the i-point input distribution with probability pi, VK,i,Normalized=(1/i) VK,i=(1/i) Ui (1:K,1:K), Ui=CiT*Ri*Ci; Ri is the correlation for i-point input, and Ci is the 2-d i×i DCT matrix.
After the computation of VK,Avg, the single secondary matrix can be determined as WK,Avg=KLT (VK,Avg). For the integer approximation with m-bit precision, multiplication can be made by 2m, and then rounding of the resulting elements in the matrix YK,Avg=round (2m*WK,Avg) can be performed.
Referring to
Referring to
As illustrated in
Finally, for Category 2 intra prediction modes, if the prediction is performed using both the left column and the top row (i.e., intra prediction modes are VER-1, VER-2, . . . VER-8 or HOR-1, HOR-2, . . . HOR-7, or if the intra prediction mode is Planar (a non-directional mode)), then decoder operation 507 is performed and the secondary transform is applied in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Of course, it is to be understood that the encoder implementation is a straightforward inverse of the decoder implementation.
In general, performing a secondary transform after a primary transform such as DCT would require additional cycles for execution, which can pose latency overhead in the encoder/decoder. The following exemplary process in the context of 2-d transforms minimizes this latency. As an example of its application, a worst case scenario from
At the encoder, it is assumed that the N×N horizontal DCT is performed, followed by the N×N vertical DCT. Let C be the N×N DCT, X be the N×N input block, and S be the K×K secondary transform. The mathematical operations that need to be carried out are:
Y=C
T
*X*C;
and
Z(1:K,1:K)=ST*Y(1:K,1:K)*S
Z(K+1:N,K+1:N)=Y(K+1:N,K+1:N);
Z(1:K,K+1:N)=Y(1:K,K+1:N);
Z(K+1:N,1:K)=Y(K+1:N,1:K);
where Y is an intermediate N×N matrix, and Z is the output N×N transformed matrix (after DCT and secondary transform). Note that the above equations simply indicate that the K×K low frequency coefficients of Y are multiplied by the secondary transform.
For vertical DCT to begin, the operations for all the N rows of horizontal DCT should finish. For example, for the 8×8 DCT it is determined that:
That is, the rows x1T to x8T of X are multiplied sequentially by the basis vectors of DCT (i.e., c1 to c8). In the first clock cycle, the processing of x1T begins (i.e., x1T is multiplied by c1 to c8) to obtain the first row of X*C. This is finished by L=(1−1)+L cycles, where L denotes the latency for DCT.
At the beginning of the 2nd clock cycle, processing of x2T starts to obtain the 2nd row of X*C. This finishes by 1+L=(2−1)+L cycles. Finally, at the end of (8−1)+L clock cycles, the 8 rows of horizontal DCT are obtained. To generalize, for an N-point transform, it takes N+L−1 cycles to complete.
Once the horizontal DCT finishes, the vertical DCT is determined as:
This will take another 8+L−1 cycles (i.e., the vertical DCT can be carried out step by step for the 1st column of the above matrix, followed by 2nd column and so on). Hence, in general, a 2-d N-point DCT will require 2*(N+L−1) cycles for the horizontal and vertical transform.
Similarly, for the 2-d K-point secondary transform, the number of cycles required would be 2*(K+M−1) where M is the latency for a row of secondary transform. Typically, for K≦8, M=1 or 2.
The total worst case overhead if the 2-d secondary transform is applied after the 2-d DCT finishes would be 2*(K+M−1)/[2*(N+L−1)]=(K+M−1)/(N+L−1). For example, for N=8, L=1, K=8, and M=1, overhead is determined to be 100%, which might not be acceptable. For N=32, L=2, K=8, and M=1, overhead is determined to be 8/33=24.24%.
According to an exemplary method of reducing the overhead, a secondary transform can be applied for the rows/columns immediately after the DCT is completed. More specifically, the following order is provided:
Horizontal (Hor) DCT
Vertical (Vert) DCT
Vertical Secondary Transform
Horizontal Secondary Transform
As soon as the 1st column of the Vertical DCT is processed, the processing of the 1st column of the Vertical secondary transform can begin via a pipelined architecture. Such flexibility would not have been available if the horizontal secondary transform was required to be taken after the Vertical DCT. In that case, it would be required to wait until all the N rows of the vertical DCT have been processed.
Assuming N>>K (e.g., N=32, and K=8), a timing diagram for the operations of Vertical DCT (which begins after N+L−1 cycles), Vertical ST, and Horizontal ST is illustrated in Table 1.
In Table 1, the row corresponding to Hor DCT shows the time when a particular row of DCT finishes. For example, the 1st row of Hor DCT finishes after L clock cycles, and row N finishes after (N+L−1) cycles. Similarly, for Vertical DCT, the 1st column finishes at (N+L−1)+L cycles. Exactly at this point, the processing of the secondary transform for the first column of the secondary transform can begin. This finishes within an additional M cycles at time (N+L−1)+L+M.
The vertical ST is completed at (N+L−1)+L+M+K−1 as shown above and now the horizontal ST can begin. This finishes in another M+K−1 cycles.
In this way, the total time for the Vertical and Horizontal ST to finish is:
T
ST=(N+L−1)+L+2*(M+K−1)cycles.
For DCT only, the time is:
T
DCT=2*(N+L−1)cycles
Thus, the Additional Cycles equal:
It is also noted that the secondary transform can sometimes finish before the DCT itself (e.g., when N=32, K=8). In that case, TST<TDCT, and hence there is no overhead. So, the above formula for Additional Cycles can be determined as:
Additional Cycles=max(0,2K+2M−1−N)
Therefore, the overhead is determined as:
As an example, for the 32×32 DCT, when N=32, the overhead latency for secondary transform at size K=8 is (assuming M=L=1) max (0,−15)/[2*32]=0. Of course, it is to be understood that the values of M=L=1 are merely for example.
For N=16, if K<=7, and M=1, then max (0,2K+2−1−16)<=max (0,−1). Therefore, for secondary transforms of size up to 7×7, there is no overhead. For the 8×8 secondary transform, the overhead is 1/32=3.125%
For N=8, assuming L=M=1, the total number of cycles for DCT is 2*(8+1−1)=16. For this case, the secondary transform is illustrated in Table 2.
From the above calculations, it appears that for N=8, a secondary transform of size 8×8 has a large overhead of 56.25%. However, in this case, the latency can be reduced by using a different logic for implementing 8×8 2-d DCT and 8×8 2-d Secondary Transform. Specifically, the following logic can be used:
Hor DCT
Hor Secondary Transform
Vertical DCT
Vertical Secondary Transform
In the above implementation, the 1st row of the secondary transform can be started as soon as the 1st row of DCT finishes. The last of the 8th row of secondary transform takes an additional M cycles after the Horizontal DCT Immediately after the horizontal secondary transform finishes, the Vertical DCT can begin, and the Vertical secondary transform can finish M cycles after the Vertical DCT.
Therefore, the overall additional cycles=2*M, and hence overhead=2*M/2(8+L−1). Assuming M=L=1, overhead=2/16=12.5%, which is much less than 56.25% in the implementation above.
A similar logic can be used for 7×7 secondary transform when DCT is of size 8×8, but such a scheme will require an additional buffer of size 7×7, since the secondary transform only needs to be applied on the top 7×7 block of 8×8 DCT.
If a parallel implementation for DCT or secondary transform is used, then the latency for the secondary transform can be further reduced.
If the order of application of DCT is vertical followed by horizontal, then the secondary transform needs to be applied as horizontal secondary transform, followed by vertical secondary transform to reduce the latency as explained above.
For Short Distance Intra Prediction (SDIP), there can be rectangular blocks of size 1×16, 2×8, 2×32, 4×16 and 8×32. In this case, the DCT may first be applied to the smaller of the dimension. For example, for 8×32 (or 2×32 case), apply 8-point vertical DCT (or 2-point DCT) followed by 32-point horizontal DCT. In such a case, the secondary transform (of size 2×2 to 8×8) can be easily completed between the 9th to 24th columns of 32-point DCT. Thus, there is no overhead in this case.
For the 1×16 and 4×16 case, the secondary transform would be required only after 16-point DCT in the vertical direction, and can be simply performed between the 2nd to 9th columns via pipelining. Thus, there is no overhead in this case as well. Finally, for the 2×8 case, the secondary transform can begin only after the 1st column of 8-point DCT. The additional latency would be M cycles (i.e., for the last column), implying overhead would be M/(2+8)=M/10=10% (assuming L=M=1).
The above analysis considered the worst-case scenario in which a secondary transform needs to be applied in both the directions. However, in many cases illustrated in
At the decoder, the latencies and overhead for a particular size of N×N DCT, and K×K secondary transform via an inverse realization as compared to the encoder, would be exactly the same as for the encoder.
The following implementation at a decoder is considered as an example:
Horizontal Inverse Secondary Transform
Vertical Inverse Secondary Transform
Vertical Inverse DCT
Horizontal Inverse DCT
Notably, this is the inverse of the first example provided above for the forward transform at the encoder.
When the K rows of the horizontal inverse secondary transform are processed in K+M−1 cycles, K vertical columns (out of the N−K columns on which no horizontal or vertical inverse secondary transform needs to be taken, when K<N−K) of DCT can be processed in K+L−1 cycles.
If K≧N−K, then it is possible to process only N−K columns while the horizontal inverse secondary transform finishes. Thus, min (K, N−K) columns of inverse Vertical DCT can be processed in K+L−1 cycles.
Next, when the inverse Vertical secondary transform is being taken from the beginning of K+M−1 cycles, we have N−min (K, N−K) columns left. This may be considered as two cases. First, if K≧N−K, then there are K columns left (i.e., on which vertical inverse secondary transform would be taken). On the other hand, if N−K>K, then N−K columns are left. The K columns for DCT can be processed as well via a pipelined architecture, and this will require only M+K+L−1 cycles, where M is because of the latency of the secondary transform's first column for the first case above. For the second case, K columns can be processed in K+L−1 cycles only, and this can be stated after K cycles only (instead of K+M−1).
Hence, at the end of (K+M−1)+M+K+L−1 cycles, (if K≧N−K) or K+K+L−1 cycles (if K<N−K), the horizontal and vertical inverse secondary transforms are finished, and min (K,N−K)+K columns of inverse vertical DCT are also processed.
The remaining number of columns for inverse DCT is N−K−min (K,N−K) which is determined as:
Hence, the remaining columns=0 if 0≧N−2K, or N−2K if N−2K≧0.
These remaining columns can be processed in an additional 0 or N−2K cycles, i.e., max (0, N−2K) cycles. Finally the horizontal inverse DCT takes N+L−1 cycles. Hence, total cycles=K+M−1+M+K+L−1+max (0, N−2K)+N+L−1=TDec if K>=N−K. Or total cycles=K+K+L−1+max (0, N−2K)+N+L−1=TDec if K<N−K.
Therefore, the number of additional cycles at the decoder is given by TDec−TDCT. Thus, if K>=N−K, the number of additional cycles TDec−TDCT is determined as:
On the other hand, if K<N−K, then the number of additional cycles TDec−TDCT is determined as:
Combining the two terms above, it is determined that the additional cycles=max (0, 2K+2M−N−1) which is the same as derived in the first example above, and hence:
When considering the decoder, the horizontal inverse DCT is taken first and then the vertical inverse DCT, the order for secondary transforms should be:
Finally, all the derivations regarding the encoder hold true for the decoder due to symmetry including statements regarding parallelization, application to SDIP block, etc. Also, for the 8×8 secondary transform and 8×8 DCT, we can reduce the latency by the following logic (which is the inverse of the second example above):
In JCTVC-F138, the following 8×8 KLT matrix K8 (with basis vectors in rows) is presented for intra residues at block size 8×8. That is, K8 is determined as:
Also, let the transposed matrix for the KLT be G8=KT, which is determined as:
Then, similar to the analysis above, this can first be made into a secondary matrix H8=C8T*G8. The basis vectors of the above matrix G have norm 128*sqrt(2). To have a secondary transform with norm 128 (so as to allow a 7-bit down-shift after application of the secondary transform), H8=round(C8T*G8/sqrt(2))) is determined as:
It is noted that the actual floating point 8×8 DCT was used above. If an alternative DCT is used (i.e., with norm 128 sqrt (2) for basis vectors), then C8,E−243 is determined as:
and H8,E−243=round(C8,E−243T*G8/sqrt(2)) is determined as:
which can be used in conjunction with the DCT above.
For the G8 matrix derived above, the value of the correlation coefficient was taken to be rho=0.65. For discussion, it is denoted as K8,0.65 where the subscripts indicate block-size and the value of rho. A different KLT K8,rho can be derived using a different value of rho (e.g., 0.6, 0.7, etc., in general rho is a real number between −1 and 1). The same analysis can then be performed for any Krho as was performed for K0.65.
Finally, the same analysis can be performed at any block-size N×N (such as 4×4) where N-point KLT KN,rho (or the 4-point KLT K4,rho) is derived for a given rho.
Notably, the above discussion concerned application of a secondary transform for intra prediction residues. The following discussion relates to application of a secondary transform to inter residues.
Referring to
As opposed to using a “flipped” DST, the data can be flipped as well. Based on this reasoning, a secondary transform can be applied as follows at larger blocks for TU0, such as 32×32 instead of a 32×32 DCT. The following is an exemplary process at an encoder by which to flip the data.
First, the input data is flipped. That is, for N-point input vector x, with entries xi, i=1 . . . N, define y with elements yi=xN+1−i. Next, take the DCT of y and denote the output as z. Finally, apply a secondary transform on the first K elements of z. Let the output be w, where the remaining “N−K” high-frequency elements are copied from z, on which the secondary transform was not applied.
Similarly at the decoder, input for the transform module may be considered v, which is a quantized version of w. In that case, the following exemplary steps can be performed for taking the inverse transform. First, apply an inverse secondary transform on the first K elements of v. Let the output be b (where the “N−K” high frequency coefficients are identical to that of v). Next, take the inverse DCT of b and denote the output as d. Finally, flip the data in d (i.e., define f with elements fi=dN+1−i). Then f is the reconstructed values for the pixels x.
For TU1, the flipping operations need not be required, and a simple DCT followed by secondary transform only needs to be taken at the encoder. At the decoder, it is merely necessary to take an inverse secondary transform followed by an inverse DCT.
It is noted that the flipping operations at the encoder and decoder for TU0 can be expensive in hardware. As an alternative, the secondary transforms may be adapted for these “flip” operations. That is, the adaptation of the secondary transforms would avoid the necessity of flipping the data. As an example, it is assumed that the N-point input vector x with entries x1 to xN in TU0 needs to be transformed appropriately. Let the 2-d N×N DCT matrix be denoted as C with elements C (i,j), where 1≦(i,j)≦N. As an example, a normalized (e.g., by 128*sqrt(2)) 8×8 DCT is determined as:
with basis vectors along columns. Note that in DCT, C(i,j)=(−1)(j−1)*C(N+1−i, j), i.e., the odd (first, third . . . ) basis vectors of DCT are symmetric about the half-way mark. And the even (second, fourth, . . . ) basis vectors are symmetric but have opposite signs. This is a very important property of DCT which can be utilized to appropriately “modulate” the secondary transform.
2.1.2 Applying Secondary Transform without “Flips”
A flipped version of x is y with elements yi=xN+1−i. In that case, DCT of y is given by:
Because the objective is to avoid actual flipping, it is possible to take the DCT of x, and then, while taking the secondary transform, incorporate the factor (−1)(j−1).
Now, let S(j,k) denote the elements of K×K secondary matrix S. The secondary transform of z, whose output is denoted by w, is as follows:
for k=1:K.
For K<k≦N, wk is determined as:
In summary, to avoid flipping in the first step at the encoder, while taking the secondary transform, multiply by (−1)(j−1)*S(j,k) instead of S(j,k) for the first K elements. For the remaining elements (K<k≦N), flip the sign of alternate DCT coefficients according to the equation above for wk.
According to the three steps applicable to a decoder as described above in Sec 2.1.1, it is necessary to take an inverse secondary transform, inverse DCT, and then flip the data. Mathematically, for an input v, the inverse secondary transform denoted by P (j,k) is taken as follows:
for 1≦k≦K.
For K<k≦N, bk=(−1)(k−1)*vk, which is the direct inverse of the events at the encoder.
Next, the input to the inverse DCT module will be b. The inverse DCT of b is d, and would be given by:
where M=C−1=CT is the inverse DCT matrix. Specifically, at size 8×8, M is determined as:
Note that, similar to DCT C, the property of M is determined as:
M(i,j)=(−1)(i−1)*M(i,N+1−j)
Finally, according to the third step at the decoder, the elements of f and d are flipped, resulting in:
This means that while taking the inverse secondary transform, instead of multiplying by elements P (1,i), we should multiply by (−1)i−1*P (1,i) to avoid flipping at the end.
For the case of TU0 in
2.3 Deriving a Primary Transform from a Secondary Transform
In case it is necessary to use a primary transform of size 8 derived from a secondary transform, an exemplary process is provided here.
First, let the secondary transform of size 8 be P, and DCT at size 8 be C. Then, a primary alternate transform can be derived as Q=C*P. Thus, if P is determined as:
then Q=round(C*P/128), which is determined as:
Note that Q is “rounded” since, in actual hardware, it is necessary to carry operations using integers, rather than floating point numbers.
A flipped version of Q would be Q2, which is determined as:
and this can be used instead of DST Type-7 as an alternate transform.
The 4×4 DST in HM is currently only for Luma components. For Chroma, there are certain prediction modes available.
Vertical, Horizontal and DC Modes (respectively denoted as modes 0, 1 and 2) are provided in HM 3.0. Here, for the vertical (respectively horizontal) mode, the transform along the direction of vertical (respectively horizontal) prediction can be DST, since it has been shown that DST is the better transform along the direction of prediction. In the other direction, DCT can be the transform. For the DC mode, since there is no directional prediction, DCT can be retained as the transform in both directions.
For the Planar mode, DST may be used as the horizontal and vertical transform for a 4×4 Chroma block coding similar to the 4×4 Luma block coding using DST in HM 3.0.
Referring to
For the Horizontal, Vertical and Planar modes in DM mode, DST and DCT combination may be used, similarly to when these modes are in Regular mode. This is based on two reasons. First, if a different transform combination for Horizontal mode (in Regular explicitly signaled mode, or as part of DM mode) is used, then the encoder would have to calculate this twice (e.g., using DST/DCT for the horizontal-regular mode), and only DCT for the horizontal-derived mode. This can make the encoder slow. Second, there could be entropy coding performed at the encoder side, where both the horizontal-regular mode and horizontal-derived mode can be mapped to the same index. The decoder would therefore be unable to distinguish between horizontal-regular and horizontal-derived mode. Therefore, it can not decide if a different transform scheme needs to be used depending on the horizontal-regular and horizontal-derived mode. A possible solution can be that the encoder sends a flag for this. But, this will increase the data (i.e., bits) and reduce the compression efficiency.
The same logic can be applied for Vertical and Planar modes, and therefore for a horizontal (or vertical, or planar)-derived mode, it is possible to use the transforms used for the Vertical, Horizontal, Planar, and DC Modes as described above.
The last prediction mode is the LM Mode in Chroma. Here, Chroma prediction is performed from reconstructed Luma pixels. Hence, this is not a directional mode and DCT can be retained as both the horizontal and vertical transform.
Similar to the analysis presented above in Section 3 for DST on 4×4 chroma blocks, it is possible to use Mode-Dependent Secondary Transforms for the horizontal, vertical and planar modes (regular or in DM mode) only of 8×8 or larger square blocks such as 16×16, 32×32 etc., as well as rectangular blocks such as 8×16, 8×32, etc. For rectangular blocks such as 4×16, a 4-point DCT or DST can be used on the dimension 4 and a secondary transform of size 8 can be applied following the DCT used on dimension 16, depending on the intra prediction mode. For the LM mode, no secondary transform would be required and DCT can be retained as both the horizontal and vertical transform.
For the horizontal mode when prediction is performed in the horizontal direction, the secondary transform needs to be applied only in the horizontal direction after the DCT, and no secondary transform should be applied along the vertical direction after the DCT. In a similar fashion, for the vertical mode, when prediction is performed in the vertical direction, the secondary transform needs to be applied only in the vertical direction after the DCT, and no secondary transform should be applied along the horizontal direction after the DCT. For the Planer mode, a secondary transform can be applied as the horizontal and vertical transform after DCT. The decoder operations for applying mode-dependent secondary transform for Chroma are similar to those for Luma, and correspond to the second, third and fourth rows (i.e., operations 503, 505, and 507) of
Referring to
Residual values are generated based on the prediction units output from the intra-prediction unit 901, the motion estimator 905, and the motion compensator 907. The generated residual values are output as quantized transform coefficients by passing through a primary transform unit 911a and a quantizer 913. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the residual values may also pass through secondary transform unit 911b after primary transform unit 911a depending on the mode of prediction.
The quantized transform coefficients are restored to residual values by passing through an inverse quantizer 915 and an inverse transform unit 917, and the restored residual values are post-processed by passing through a de-blocking unit 919 and a loop filtering unit 921 and output as the reference frame 909. The quantized transform coefficients may be output as a bitstream 925 by passing through an entropy encoder 923.
Referring to
To perform decoding, components of the image decoder 1000, i.e., the parser 1003, the entropy decoder 1005, the inverse quantizer 1007, the inverse primary transform unit 1009b, the inverse secondary transform unit 1009a, the intra prediction unit 1011, the motion compensator 1013, the de-blocking unit 1015 and the loop filtering unit 1017, perform the image decoding process.
While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of a U.S. Provisional application filed on Jul. 1, 2011 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and assigned Ser. No. 61/504,136, of a U.S. Provisional application filed on Sep. 23, 2011 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and assigned Ser. No. 61/538,656, of a U.S. Provisional application filed on Oct. 18, 2011 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and assigned Ser. No. 61/548,656, and of a U.S. Provisional application filed on Nov. 18, 2011 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and assigned Ser. No. 61/561,769, the entire disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61504136 | Jul 2011 | US | |
61538656 | Sep 2011 | US | |
61548656 | Oct 2011 | US | |
61561769 | Nov 2011 | US |