1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to optical coupling into a planar waveguide and, in particular, to a mode size converter for coupling light into and out of a planar waveguide and to efficiently transform guided light within continuous waveguide structures.
2. Discussion of Related Art
The increasing prevalence of fiber optic communications systems has created an unprecedented demand for devices for processing optical signals. Planar devices such as optical waveguides, couplers, splitters, and amplifiers, fabricated on planar substrates, like those commonly used for integrated circuits, and configured to receive and process signals from optical fibers are highly desirable. Such devices hold promise for integrated optical and electronic signal processing on a single semiconductor-like substance.
The basic design of planar optical waveguides and amplifiers is well known, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,119,460 and 5,563,979 to Bruce et al., 5,613,995 to Bhandarkar et al., 5,900,057 to Buchal et al., and 5,107,538 to Benton et al., to cite only a few. These devices, very generally, include a core region, typically bar shaped, of a certain refractive index surrounded by a cladding region of a lower refractive index. In the case of an optical amplifier, the core region includes a certain concentration of a dopant, typically a rare earth ion such as an erbium or praseodymium ion which, when pumped by a laser, fluoresces, for example, in the 1550 nm and 1300 nm wavelength ranges used for optical communication, to amplify the optical signal passing through the core.
Many designs have been disclosed for the purpose of mode size or spot size conversion in planar optical wave guide devices. In general, a change in the core of the wave guide, either to it's index or to it's cross sectional dimensions, over a suitably long distance is utilized to effect a change in the mode size or mode order of the guided light wave. The requirement for gradual change in the properties that govern the mode size is well understood with regard to efficient or ‘adiabatic’ transformation, which results in loss-less conversion of the guided light to a mode having transformed properties such as size, order, shape or propagation constant.
In practice however, it is difficult to change the dimensions of a planar wave guide without loss due to roughness or to non-uniform changes in the wave guide. In particular, sufficiently slowly varying dimensions with a sufficiently smooth surface, so that the light is efficiently converted in its modal properties, without scattering or loss due to roughness or to non-uniform changes in the dimensions or index of the wave guide is very hard to achieve, particularly for high contrast or refractory wave guide materials.
In-plane (i.e., in the plane of the substrate) as well as out-of-plane (i.e., perpendicular to the plane of the substrate) tapers can be achieved by lithographic and etching means. However, it is difficult to achieve sufficiently uniform results for a portion of a film or wave guide tapered over a few mm to a few cm regions across, for instance, a production silicon wafer having dimensions of 100 to 300 mm.
Therefore, there is a need for tapered waveguides with low surface roughness in order to provide mode size conversion with low coupling loss.
In accordance with the present invention, a smooth waveguide taper is presented. A smooth waveguide taper can be produced as an out-of-plane taper during deposition of the film by a shadow-mask deposition. A shadow mask is placed over the substrate in a PVD reactor during deposition. The resulting taper can be monotonically variable in thickness as well as atomic like in smoothness.
Further, in some embodiments the length of the taper can be controlled by controlling the shadow mask shape and the separation between the shadow mask and the wafer. In some embodiments, a long taper may be produced. In some embodiments, a short taper of order less than a millimeter can be produced.
Several mode size coupling devices can be fabricated according to the present invention. In some embodiments, a tapered core material is deposited on an under cladding layer which was deposited on a substrate. The tapered core material can then be patterned to form a waveguide core and an uppercladding layer can be formed over the waveguide core. The tapered waveguide core can be an active or a passive waveguide material. In some embodiments, another core material can be deposited between the tapered waveguide core and the substrate. In some embodiments, another core material can be deposited over the tapered waveguide core.
In some embodiments, a first core layer can be deposited and then a tapered core layer deposited having the same material properties as the first core layer. In some embodiments, a tapered active core layer can be deposited with a passive layer overlying it, or a passive layer surrounding it, or a passive layer deposited under it.
These and other embodiments are further discussed below with respect to the following figures.
In the figures, elements having the same designation have the same or similar functions.
RF sputtering of oxide films is discussed in application Ser. No. 09/903,050 (the '050 application) by Demaray et al., entitled “Planar Optical Devices and Methods for Their Manufacture,” assigned to the same assignee as is the present invention, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Depositions by biased pulse-DC sputtering are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,863 (the '863 application), herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Further, targets that can be utilized in a reactor according to the present invention are discussed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,341 (the '341 application), filed on Mar. 16, 2002, assigned to the same assignee as is the present invention, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. A gain-flattened amplifier formed of films deposited according to the present invention are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,493 (the '493 application), filed on Mar. 16, 2002, assigned to the same assignee as is the present invention, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Three features of etched tapers limit the production of low loss wave guides with mode size transforming regions: sidewall and surface roughness, the terminal radius of the taper and most important, the relative fluctuation of the core dimension due to roughness for small core dimensions.
As an etched or polished film approaches the termination of the taper or etch, it is difficult to complete the taper without a terminal radius of curvature or a terminal roughness. This is due as much to initial film roughness and initial thickness non uniformity as it is to the non uniformities in the etch mask process printing and material and the porosity and etch selectivity of the composition of the film material. A film with 5% thickness variation, for example, can not be etched to the final 5% of the initial film thickness without becoming a discontinuous film, at least in parts. Although the 5% initial variation in a 5 micron film, some 250 nm variation, might vary smoothly and not be a problem as a feature of a patterned, constant dimension core of a buried channel waveguide (BCW), the same variation, either as a periodic structure or a terminal radius of an etched film can act as a scattering center, introducing unwanted loss or polarization to the guided light.
In the case of a ridge wave guide, the scattering loss induced by the roughness of the sides or top of the ridge is increased by the high index contrast of the ridge to air. In the case of buried channel wave guides, BCWs, the cladding reduces the contrast to the core found in the air cladded ridge wave guide. Reduced contrast reduces the side wall scattering loss for wide width BCWs. However, as the contrast of the BCW increases, the scattering loss due to roughness is increased rapidly in at least two ways: First, scattering is increased in proportion to the contrast of the buried core with the cladding index; and Second, it is increased by the decrease in the size of the core that is required for single mode propagation at any wavelength with higher contrast.
The second effect illustrates the more important consideration. The scattering loss is proportional to the square of the ratio of the roughness dimension over the half width of the BCW core. This is known as the “relative fluctuation of the core thickness”. See F
Consequently, as the wave guide width is decreased, the scattering due to side wall roughness increases rapidly. As an example, a low refractive index contrast step BCW with a half width of 4.44 microns and a 0.2% contrast must have a relative fluctuation of the core thickness of less than 1% to achieve a loss not greater than 0.01 dB/cm for light of 1.3 microns. Id.
The scattering of c-band light near 1550 nm would be similar to that for 1.3 micron light.
For the same range of BCD index contrast, mode field diameter and core half width, the relative fluctuation of the core thickness and the loss in dB/cm are correlated for a range of roughness dimension from 0.001 to 0.256 microns (1 to 256 nm) in steps of 2×.
The core half widths (half the size of the core width) chosen in
The gain of a doped BCW amplifier is proportional to the number of dopant ions, for instance erbium ions, in the excited state. The fraction of excited active ions is proportional to the intensity of the light. Consequently, it is of great utility to provide an adiabatic mode size transition from a small contrast, large mode wave guide, suitable for low loss coupling to fiber, to a high contrast, small mode wave guide. The mode field diameter in the range of between about 0.2% to 0.4% is similar to that of an SMF-28 fiber. Consequently a wave guide with this mode size will couple efficiently to light propagating from the fiber.
As shown in the table of
If the light in such a large passive wave guide were coupled efficiently by a mode size conversion device into a high contrast wave guide, the intensity of the pump light could be increased very substantially. AS shown in table 1, in the case of the 6% contrast wave guide, the mode field diameter is 2.4 microns. The increase in optical intensity of the pump light is proportional to the square of the ratio of the respective mode field diameters which is approximately ˜(10/2.4)2˜17.
It is also clear that the roughness that governs the loss in a BCW is due to the mode limiting dimension of the core. That is, if the width is tapered to a smaller value, it is the roughness associated with the side wall roughness associated with the relative variation in the width that determines the scattering loss. Likewise, if the thickness of the BCW is varied so as to limit the mode field of the guided light, it is the relative variation of the roughness associated with the thickness that is most important in governing the loss of the resulting BCW.
Many processes have been developed to provide tapered planar wave guide structures for the purpose of spot size or mode size conversion. Some of these utilize an etch step in at least one dimension of the core or cladding or both. In the case of polymer or other low temperature glassy material which can be re-flowed or smoothed by partial melting, subject to surface tension, post etch improvement in the surface quality can be achieved. Dry etching of low contrast wide core BCWs can achieve this result. However, it is not possible for higher contrast, smaller dimension BCWs to be produced by these methods because the roughness induced increases rapidly as the contrast increases and the core size decreases. This is particularly true in refractory materials that can not be raised to the melting point.
Although the in-plane dimension or width of a core wave guide structure is easily modified by lithographic means, either by directly patterning a deposited film and etching or by filling an etched trench, the required degree of change in width over the necessary distance, it is very difficult to achieve a sufficiently smooth etched ridge sidewall to avoid high scattering, losses for a narrow, high contrast core. U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,979 to Bruce, et. al. discusses tapering of the core of a light wave guiding structure having a high index contrast of 11%. Bruce et al. suggest that the taper needs to be gradual, at least a hundred times the cross sectional dimension of the core which is on the order of a micron thick. They also suggest that the means of achieving such a taper in both the width and the thickness of an aluminosilicate are known.
However, in high temperature material, such as pure silica, or alumina or other refractory oxide material, it is difficult to achieve a side wall roughness less than 50-100 nano meters using reactive or other dry plasma etch processes.
Taper of the thickness of a deposited film or core is more difficult. Although tapering can be achieved by etching using a gray scale mask techniques or a shadow mask. See, e.g., M. Itoh, et. al., “Large Reduction of Single Fiber Coupling Loss in 1.5% Delta Planar Lightwave Circuits using Spot-size Converters”, Electronic Letters 17 Jan. 2002 Vol. 38 No. 2. Uniform etching of a film of tenths of microns to several microns over hundreds of microns of length is, however, very difficult. In particular the roughness of the surface of the core having the highest intensity of guided light is the most important. Re-melting can be used to smooth low temperature materials but not for materials that can not be raised to their melting point, for example erbium doped aluminasilicates.
In the case of the BCW, the thickness dimension is often the smallest or mode limiting dimension. In this case, the roughness of the lateral edges is of less importance since the mode size is confined proportionally more by the thickness dimension. However, dry etching of a surface is prone to roughness due to build up of non volatile components of the film as well as differential erosion due to density variation or differential etch selectivity of the component elements of the film. Moreover, the use of an etch shadow mask is limited to a range of taper lengths due to the limited mean free path of the etching process. The mean free path in a gas is a measure of the average distance between collisions of the gas. It is also a measure of the line of sight distance a shaddow can be projected in a gas. It is also a measure of the distance over which a directionality can be preserved in a gaseous flux without the randomization effect of the background scattering gas. Typical dry etch processes are performed at a process pressure of several Torr. At one Torr the mean free path or average distance traveled in the vacuum by a gas atom at room temperature without a collision is about 0.1 mm or 100 microns. This distance complies with the (100× core width) taper length requirement for the adiabatic taper of a 1 micron dimension. See L
A shadow mask 209 is positioned Over substrate 205. In some embodiments, mask 209 may be fitted over a wafer substrate 205. In some embodiments, mask 209 may be positioned on substrate 205 or be a structure previously formed on substrate 205. Core film 206 is then deposited, but with shadow mask 209 in place a smooth taper 207 is formed.
In the deposition process illustrated in
The edge of the cutout of shaddow mask 204 was positioned approximately at the 25 mm position, above the position of film taper 207 at approximately half the full thickness of the film. Layer 206 was deposited at a pulsed DC sputtering power of about 5 kWatts, at a rate of about 500 nm/hour, with substrate radio frequency power bias of about 300 Watts at 2 MHz. The film has an index contrast of about 4% to thermal oxide, as has been described in the '245 application.
The first and last 10% of the film taper of taper region 207 occurs over about 20 mm each. The remaining 80% of the taper in taper region 207 occurs over about 10 mm or 10,000 microns. Consequently, over the steep portion of the film taper, the rate of taper in this example is about 1.400 microns/10,000 microns or 0.14 parts per thousand. Other embodiments will result in other geometries of taper region 207. The surface roughness of the Er/Yb doped aluminosilicate film 206 of this example at the full thickness region was about 0.2 nm. A similar surface roughness was found at the half height region of the film taper 207 for this example.
If the mask is supported at a distance from the surface to be coated, some portion of the vapor will be deposited under the mask, forming a continuous portion of the film taper.
The taper 207 can be a positive or negative taper in the thickness of layer 206. The tapered film can be deposited over a planar film of the same composition without an interface between the two layers. In this way the taper can reduce the thickness of the combined film to a precisely determined continuing thickness, that of the initial film. This taper configuration can be referred to as the YC taper. A region of no deposition can be disposed under a shadow mask so that a positive taper is obtained on either side of mask 209. Likewise, mask 209 can be utilized to form a well-like region in a layer of otherwise precise thickness.
Mask 209 and substrate 205 to be coated are introduced to a sputter target 204 having a substantially uniform area of target erosion as described in the '050 application and in the '863 application. Such a sputter target has an area of erosion that is larger than the substrate to be coated. The sputter source can be a planar magnetron but it should advantageously demonstrate an area of erosion adjacent to the article to be coated which is diode like in sputter erosion uniformity. It is preferred that such a sputter target sputter more than 20% of its weight as sputtered material before the non-uniformity of the film is more than about 10% of the film thickness and preferably as much as 50% of the target weight. Such a sputter source provides a uniform distribution of sputtered vapor at substrate 205. The sputter process should have a mean free path at least as long as the length of tapered region 207 to be coated or longer. A sputter pressure of 1 milliTorr is estimated to have a mean free path of about 10 cm. Consequently, a sputter pressure of 2 to 5 milliTorr will enable the mask to intercept vapor with a line of sight trajectory as far as several centimeters from the mask. In this case a layer 206 is deposited on the wafer having a film thickness which is smoothly increasing from zero thickness in the region under mask 209 to the region away from mask 209 which has a thickness similar to the thickness of layer 206 deposited with shaddow mask 209. The region of film having an increasing thickness, region 207, is said to be in the line of sight shaddow of the physical vapor. The formation of tapered thickness optical films by means of such a process lead directly to low loss, efficient mode size converting wave guides and amplifiers. See Tao Pan et al., “Gain Flattened, High Index Contrast Planar Er3+-doped Waveguide Amplifier with an Integrated Mode Size Converter,” submitted to Optical Fiber Conference, March 19-21, Anneheim Ca., 2002.
In
Device 710 can couple light into and out of both sides of waveguide 608. In some embodiments, core layer 206 may be active core material and device 710 can function as an amplifier device.
Coupling of light between a core of a core layer 604 and a core of core layer 206 is determined by the index difference between core layer 604 and core layer 206. Light will preferentially transition to the region of higher index. Therefore, in an active core region 206 of higher index over a passive core region 604 of lower index, light will transition from passive core region 604 to active core region 206. If the vertical taper 207 of core layer 206 is long enough (for example greater than about 200 μm) and smooth enough, then the transition will be substantially adiabatic.
The rightmost data points in each curve assume a square, untapered, waveguide. The thickness of the thinnest portion of tapered region 207 is then reduced and the coupling efficiency is calculated. Each individual curve in
In one example, a YC taper was formed by reducing the thickness of a core layer 206 as is shown in
In another example of a mode size converter, as shown in
In an example of coupling a laser to a high-index waveguide as is shown in
In general, any combination of active and passive core layers with cladding layers of any relative dimensions can be deposited. Any number of tapered core layers can be utilized, having any index variation achievable. For example, symmetrical cladding (i.e., undercladding layer and uppercladding layers) can be utilized. Additionally, assymetric cladding layers can also be utilized.
The examples and embodiments discussed above are exemplary only and are not intended to be limiting. One skilled in the art can vary the processes specifically described here in various ways. Further, the theories and discussions of mechanisms presented above are for discussion only. The invention disclosed herein is not intended to be bound by any particular theory set forth by the inventors to explain the results obtained. As such, the invention is limited only by the following claims.
This is a division of application Ser. No. 10/101,492, filed Mar. 16, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,327, now published as US 2003-0173208 A1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3309302 | Heil | Mar 1967 | A |
3616403 | Collins et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3850604 | Klein | Nov 1974 | A |
4082569 | Evans, Jr. | Apr 1978 | A |
4111523 | Kaminow et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4437966 | Hope et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4587225 | Tsukuma et al. | May 1986 | A |
4619680 | Nourshargh et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
RE32449 | Claussen | Jun 1987 | E |
4710940 | Sipes, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4785459 | Baer | Nov 1988 | A |
4812712 | Ohnishi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4915810 | Kestigian et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4978437 | Wirz | Dec 1990 | A |
5078516 | Kapon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085904 | Deak et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5107538 | Benton et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5119460 | Bruce et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5173271 | Chen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174876 | Buchal et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5196041 | Tumminelli et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200029 | Bruce et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206925 | Nakazawa et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5225288 | Beeson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237439 | Misono et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5252194 | Demaray et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5287427 | Atkins et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296089 | Chen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303319 | Ford et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306569 | Hiraki | Apr 1994 | A |
5309302 | Vollmann | May 1994 | A |
5338625 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5355089 | Treger | Oct 1994 | A |
5362672 | Ohmi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381262 | Arima et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5427669 | Drummond | Jun 1995 | A |
5433835 | Demaray | Jul 1995 | A |
5435826 | Sakakibara et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5457569 | Liou et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5472795 | Atita | Dec 1995 | A |
5475528 | LaBorde | Dec 1995 | A |
5478456 | Humpal et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5483613 | Bruce et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499207 | Miki et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512147 | Bates et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538796 | Schaffer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555127 | Abdelkader et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561004 | Bates et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563979 | Bruce et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565071 | Demaray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569520 | Bates | Oct 1996 | A |
5591520 | Migliorini et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597660 | Bates et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603816 | Demaray et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607560 | Hirabayashi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607789 | Treger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612152 | Bates | Mar 1997 | A |
5613995 | Bhandarkar et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645626 | Edlund et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654054 | Tropsha et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654984 | Hershbarger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686360 | Harvey, III et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689522 | Beach | Nov 1997 | A |
5693956 | Shi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702829 | Paidassi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5718813 | Drummond | Feb 1998 | A |
5719976 | Henry et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731661 | So et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738731 | Shindo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755938 | Fukui et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757126 | Harvey, III et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761234 | Craig et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762768 | Goy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771562 | Harvey, III et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789071 | Sproul et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792550 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811177 | Shi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830330 | Lantsman | Nov 1998 | A |
5831262 | Greywall et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841931 | Foresi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847865 | Gopinath et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849163 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853830 | McCaulley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855744 | Halsey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870273 | Sogabe et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882946 | Otani | Mar 1999 | A |
5900057 | Buchal et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909346 | Malhotra et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930046 | Solberg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930584 | Sun et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942089 | Sproul et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948215 | Lantsman | Sep 1999 | A |
5952778 | Haskal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961682 | Lee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966491 | DiGiovanni | Oct 1999 | A |
5972516 | Kaneko et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977582 | Fleming et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000603 | Koskenmaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001224 | Drummond et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004660 | Topolski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024844 | Drummond et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045626 | Yano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046081 | Kuo | Apr 2000 | A |
6051114 | Yao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051296 | McCaulley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052397 | Jeon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057557 | Ichikawa | May 2000 | A |
6058233 | Dragone | May 2000 | A |
6071323 | Kawaguchi | Jun 2000 | A |
6077642 | Ogata et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080643 | Noguchi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088492 | Kaneko et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093944 | VanDover | Jul 2000 | A |
6106933 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117279 | Smolanoff et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125225 | Dianov et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133670 | Rodgers et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146225 | Sheats et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154582 | Bazylenko et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157765 | Bruce et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162709 | Raoux et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165566 | Tropsha | Dec 2000 | A |
6168884 | Neudecker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176986 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197167 | Tanaka | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198217 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204111 | Uemoto et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210544 | Sasaki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214660 | Uemoto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232242 | Hata et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236793 | Lawrence et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242129 | Johnson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242132 | Neudecker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248291 | Nakagama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248640 | Nam | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261917 | Quek et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280585 | Obinata et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280875 | Kwak et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281142 | Basceri et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287986 | Mihara | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288835 | Nilsson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290821 | McLeod | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290822 | Fleming et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293688 | Deacon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300215 | Shin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302939 | Rabin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306265 | Fu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6344419 | Forster et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350353 | Gopalraja et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6356694 | Weber | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358810 | Dornfest et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361662 | Chiba et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365300 | Ota et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6365319 | Heath et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376027 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396984 | Cho et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409965 | Nagata et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411764 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413382 | Wang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6413645 | Graff et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416598 | Sircar | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423776 | Akkapeddi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433380 | Shin | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6444750 | Touhsaent | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452717 | Endo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488822 | Moslehi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506289 | Demaray et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6511615 | Dawes et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6533907 | Demaray et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537428 | Xiong et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549688 | Bazylenko | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563998 | Farah et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576546 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6602338 | Chen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605228 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615614 | Makikawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632563 | Krasnov et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641704 | Someno | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673716 | D'Couto et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683244 | Fujimori et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683749 | Daby et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690868 | Donalds et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6750156 | Le et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751241 | Davis et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760520 | Medin et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768855 | Bakke et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6818356 | Bates | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827826 | Demaray et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846765 | Imamura et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6884327 | Pan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7218809 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7340124 | Patel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7378356 | Zhang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381657 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7413998 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7469558 | Demaray et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7544276 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7826702 | Dawes | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010027159 | Kaneyoshi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031122 | Lackritz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041460 | Wiggins | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001746 | Jenson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014406 | Takashima | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033330 | Demaray et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020076133 | Li et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100413 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020106297 | Ueno et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115252 | Haukka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020134671 | Demaray et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140103 | Kloster et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020141682 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170821 | Sandlin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191916 | Frish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007718 | Bazylenko | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019326 | Han et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022487 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035906 | Memarian et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030042131 | Johnson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044118 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063629 | Davis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030063883 | Demaray et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077914 | Le et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079838 | Brcka | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097858 | Strohhofer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127319 | Demaray et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134054 | Demaray et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141186 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173207 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030173208 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174391 | Pan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030175142 | Milonopoulou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030178637 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185266 | Henrichs | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040043557 | Haukka et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040077161 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105644 | Dawes | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040208454 | Montgomery et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259305 | Demaray et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000794 | Demaray et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006768 | Narasimhan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050048802 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105853 | Liu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050183946 | Pan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050225839 | Patel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060054496 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057283 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057304 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071592 | Narasimhan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134522 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070263676 | Beukema et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080107376 | Patel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 38 738 | Jan 1989 | DE |
0 510 883 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0 639 655 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 652 308 | May 1995 | EP |
0 820 088 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 867 985 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1 068 899 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 092 689 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 189 080 | Mar 2002 | EP |
61-60803 | Mar 1986 | JP |
62-287071 | Dec 1987 | JP |
2-054764 | Feb 1990 | JP |
5-230642 | Sep 1993 | JP |
6-010127 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-100333 | Apr 1994 | JP |
7-233469 | May 1995 | JP |
7-224379 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2002-26187 | Apr 2002 | KR |
WO 9623085 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9735044 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9961674 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0021898 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0022742 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0036665 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0182297 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0212932 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2004021532 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004077519 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004106581 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004106582 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006063308 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050175287 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10101492 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 11100856 | US |