Model based enrichment for exhaust temperature protection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6286305
  • Patent Number
    6,286,305
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 23, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 11, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method for controlling the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter. The method includes the steps of calculating a stabilized catalyst temperature limit, determining a stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment, comparing the stabilized catalyst temperature limit with the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and enriching a fuel/air ratio to maintain a stabilized catalyst temperature at the stabilized catalyst temperature limit if the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is greater than the stabilized catalyst temperature limit. A vehicle having a controller for controlling the enrichment of an air/fuel ratio to control the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter is also provided.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




The present invention relates generally to the control of internal combustion engines and more particularly to a control device and a method for controlling the enrichment of a fuel/air ratio supplied to an internal combustion engine to maintain the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter below a predetermined temperature limit.




2. Discussion




Catalytic converters are used to reduce major air pollutants, such as hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen, contained in the exhaust gas from an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle. Each converter contains catalysts that produce an exothermic chemical reaction that transforms noxious pollutants into carbon dioxide and water vapor. The catalytic converter is integrated downstream from the vehicle's engine into the vehicle's exhaust system.




The effectiveness of reducing pollutants by a catalytic converter is highly dependent on the temperature and total gas throughput which in turn depends on the operational states and conditions of the internal combustion engine. Over time, catalyst efficiency degrades and thus decreases the capacity of the converter to convert noxious pollutants. Increasingly stringent federal and state motor vehicle emission standards include regulations on the longevity of emission controlling devices such as catalytic converters.




One factor which causes the performance of the catalytic converter to severely deteriorate over time due is the operation of the catalytic converter at high temperatures for prolonged periods of time. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a controller and a method for controlling the operation of the vehicle to maintain the temperature of the catalyst in the catalytic converter below a predetermined temperature limit so as to prolong the effective life of the catalytic converter.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is one object of the present invention to provide a method which controls the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter below a predetermined temperature limit.




It is a more specific object of the present invention to provide a method for controlling the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter through the enrichment of a fuel/air ratio.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a vehicle having a controller for controlling the enrichment of an air/fuel ratio to control the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter.




In one form, the present invention provides a method for controlling the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter. The method includes the steps of calculating a stabilized catalyst temperature limit, determining a stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment, comparing the stabilized catalyst temperature limit with the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and enriching a fuel/air ratio to maintain a stabilized catalyst temperature at the stabilized catalyst temperature limit if the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is greater than the stabilized catalyst temperature limit. A vehicle having a controller for controlling the enrichment of an air/fuel ratio to control the temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter is also provided.











Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a portion of a vehicle constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention; and





FIG. 2

is a schematic illustration of the method of the present invention in flow chart form.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




With reference to

FIG. 1

of the drawings, a vehicle constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention is generally indicated by reference numeral


10


. Vehicle


10


is shown to include an engine assembly


12


, an air intake system


14


, an exhaust system


16


, an exhaust gas recirculation system


18


and a controller


20


. Engine assembly


12


conventionally includes an internal combustion engine


30


, a plurality of fuel injectors


32


, a plurality of spark plugs


34


, a knock sensor


36


and a crankshaft speed sensor


38


.




Controller


20


is conventionally coupled to fuel injectors


32


to selectively control the magnitude of a fuel charge delivered to each of the cylinders of engine


30


. Controller


20


is also conventionally coupled to spark plugs


34


to permit the spark delivery angle to be varied in a desired manner.




Knock sensor


36


is coupled to engine


30


and is operable for sensing vibrations associated with a knocking cylinder and producing a knock sensor signal in response thereto. Crankshaft speed sensor


38


is operable for sensing the rotational speed of the engine crankshaft (not specifically shown) and producing a speed signal in response thereto. Controller


20


receives knock sensor signal and speed signal.




Air intake system


14


is shown to include an intake manifold


40


, a throttle


42


, a manifold absolute pressure MAP sensor


44


, a throttle position sensor


46


and an ambient air temperature sensor


47


. Intake manifold


40


and throttle


42


are conventional in construction and operation and need not be discussed in detail. Briefly, throttle


42


is selectively positionable between a closed position which inhibits the flow of air into intake manifold


40


, and an open position. Throttle


42


and the plurality of fuel injectors


32


cooperate to form a fuel/air delivery means


48


for selectively controlling a fuel/air ratio delivered to engine


30


.




MAP sensor


44


is operable for sensing the pressure of a gas in the intake manifold


40


and producing a MAP sensor signal in response thereto. Throttle position sensor


46


is operable for sensing the amount by which throttle


42


is opened and producing a throttle position signal in response thereto. Ambient air temperature sensor


47


is operable for sensing the temperature of the air being drawn into air intake system


14


and producing an ambient air temperature signal in response thereto. Controller


20


receives the MAP signal, the throttle position signal and the ambient air temperature signal. Controller


20


is able to calculate the flow rate of air into engine


30


based on the signals from the sensors described above.




Exhaust system


16


includes an exhaust manifold


50


and a catalytic converter


52


. Exhaust manifold


50


and catalytic converter


52


are conventional in their construction and operation and need not be discussed in detail. Briefly, exhaust manifold


50


directs exhaust gases into catalytic converter


52


where the exhaust gases contact a catalyst


56


. If the temperature of catalyst


56


is above a predetermined light-off temperature, catalyst


56


participates in an exothermic reaction wherein noxious components of the exhaust gases are converted to carbon dioxide and water vapor. Controller


20


is able to calculate the flow rate of exhaust gases discharged from engine


30


since the intake air flow is known.




Exhaust gas recirculation system


18


includes a conduit


60


and a valve assembly


62


. Conduit


60


couples valve assembly


62


to exhaust system


16


and air intake system


14


. Controller


20


is operable for selectively controlling valve assembly


62


between an open position and a closed position to control an amount of exhaust gas input to air intake system


14


. Controller


20


is also coupled to a plurality of vehicle sensors, such as vehicle speed sensor


70


, and receives a plurality of sensor signals indicative of a plurality of vehicle dynamics, such as the vehicle speed.




In

FIG. 2

, the method of the present invention is illustrated in flowchart form. The method is entered at bubble


100


and proceeds to block


102


where the methodology determines a first catalyst temperature. If the updated catalyst temperature is known from a previous iteration of the methodology and engine assembly


12


has not been turned off, the methodology will set the first catalyst temperature equal to the updated catalyst temperature in block


102


.




Otherwise, the methodology will set the first catalyst temperature equal to an initialized startup value which has been calculated from a model that considers the value of last catalyst temperature that had been calculated, the ambient air temperature and the elapsed time since the calculation of the last catalyst temperature. Accordingly, the initialized startup value may be calculated according to the following formula:








T


(


ISUV


)=


T


(


LCCT


)−{[


T


(


LCCT


)−


T


(


AMB


)]×CDF}






where:




T(ISUV)=the initialized startup value;




T(LCCT)=the last calculated catalyst temperature;




T(AMB)=the ambient air temperature; and




CDF=a cool down fraction which approximates how completely the catalyst


56


has cooled down based upon the elapsed time since the calculation of the last catalyst temperature.




The methodology next proceeds to block


104


where the methodology determines the quantity of cylinders which are not being actively fueled, as when engine


30


is being used as an air pump to decelerate the vehicle or to provide greater fuel economy. The methodology then proceeds to block


106


.




In block


106


the methodology next determines a steady state base temperature of catalyst


56


. The steady state base temperature is related to both the amount of heat which is directed to catalyst


56


and the amount of heat generated by catalyst


56


at the present condition under which vehicle


10


is being operated. In the particular embodiment disclosed data for the steady state base temperature is provided in tabular form and is based on the manifold absolute pressure and the engine rotational speed.




The methodology next proceeds to block


108


where a heat-sink term is calculated. The heat-sink term reflects the loss of heat from the exhaust gas to the exhaust system


16


after vehicle


10


is started. The heat sink term is initialized at the start-up of the vehicle


10


and is based on the amount of time since the engine assembly


12


had last been operated (i.e., the length of time the engine assembly


12


had been off). The heat sink term decays to a value of zero at a rate based on the flow rate of exhaust gases discharged from engine


30


. The methodology next proceeds to block


110


.




In block


110


the methodology calculates a convection cooling correction term based on the speed of vehicle


10


as sensed by vehicle speed sensor


70


. The convection cooling correction term takes into consideration the fact that heat will be released from the catalytic converter


52


to the environment through convection cooling when vehicle


10


is being operated and that the amount of heat that is released will be approximately proportional to the speed of vehicle. The methodology next proceeds to block


112


.




In block


112


the methodology determines the ambient air temperature as sensed by ambient air temperature sensor


47


. The methodology then calculates the difference between a reference temperature and the ambient temperature and uses this difference to calculate an ambient cooling correction term. The ambient cooling correction term takes into consideration the fact that the data for the steady state base temperature is based on data taken at a predetermined ambient temperature such as 70° F. Accordingly, the ambient cooling correction term compensates for the variances in the convection cooling correction term that result when the ambient temperature varies from the predetermined ambient temperature at which the data for the steady state base temperature was taken. In the particular embodiment illustrated, the ambient cooling correction term is determined by multiplying the difference between a reference temperature and the ambient temperature by a predetermined ambient correction gain.




The methodology next proceeds to block


114


where the methodology determines an actual fuel/air ratio, calculates the difference between a stoichiometric fuel/air ratio and the actual fuel/air ratio and uses the difference between the stoichiometric fuel/air ratio and the actual fuel/air ratio to calculate an enrichment cooling correction term. The enrichment cooling correction term takes into consideration the heat that is absorbed by unburned fuel that exits the engine


30


. In the particular embodiment illustrated, the enrichment cooling correction term is determined by multiplying the absolute value of the difference between the stoichiometric fuel/air ratio and the actual fuel/air ratio by a predetermined fuel/air correction gain.




The methodology then proceeds to block


116


where the methodology calculates a spark angle heating rate correction term. The methodology initially determines a theoretical spark delivery angle that provides a maximum brake torque. The methodology next determines an actual spark delivery angle which may be the most recent spark delivery angle used or an average spark delivery angle as applied to several of the spark plugs


34


. The methodology then calculates a difference between the theoretical spark delivery angle and the actual spark delivery angle and uses this difference to calculate a spark angle heating rate correction term. The spark angle heating rate correction term takes into account that as the actual spark delivery angle moves away from the theoretical spark delivery angle for maximum brake torque, less energy from the combustion of a fuel charge is being used in the engine


30


for work (i.e., to push the pistons and rotate the crankshaft) and more energy is being used for the production of heat. In the particular embodiment illustrated, the spark angle heating rate correction term is determined by multiplying the difference between the theoretical spark delivery angle and the actual spark delivery angle by a predetermined spark correction gain. The methodology next proceeds to block


118


.




In block


118


the methodology calculates a misfire heating correction term. The methodology initially determines the rate at which the engine


30


is misfiring and uses this rate to calculate the misfire heating correction term. Accordingly, the misfire heating correction term takes into account the absence of combustion in a cylinder that is misfiring and the associated increase in the amount of chemical energy rejected by the engine


30


in the exhaust gases. In the particular embodiment illustrated, the misfire heating correction term is determined by multiplying the rate of misfire by a predetermined misfire correction gain.




The methodology next proceeds to block


120


where the methodology determines if an exothermic heating rate correction term is to be excluded. The exothermic heating rate correction term compensates for the quantity of heat produced by the exothermal reaction within the catalytic converter


52


; the exothermal reaction, however, will only take place if the temperature of catalyst


56


is over a predetermined catalyst light-off temperature. Accordingly, the methodology first determines if the first catalyst temperature (as determined at block


102


) exceeds a predetermined catalyst light-off temperature. If the first catalyst temperature exceeds the predetermined catalyst light-off temperature, the exothermic heating rate correction term is set to a first predetermined value, such as zero. If the first catalyst temperature does not exceed the predetermined catalyst light-off temperature, the exothermic heating rate correction term is set to a second predetermined value. The methodology next proceeds to block


124


.




The methodology next proceeds to block


124


where a first portion of the stabilized catalyst temperature is calculated. The stabilized catalyst temperature is the temperature that the catalyst would stabilize at if the present operating conditions were held constant for a sufficient amount of time. Accordingly, the stabilized catalyst temperature is not necessarily equal to the temperature of the catalyst. The methodology initially sums the steady state base temperature with the heat-sink term, the convection cooling correction term, the ambient cooling correction term, the enrichment cooling correction term, the spark angle heating rate correction term, the misfire heating correction term and the exothermic heating rate correction term. This sum is then multiplied by the fraction of cylinders which are being actively fueled. The fraction of cylinders which are being actively fueled is equal to the quantity of 1−[(the quantity of cylinders not being actively fueled)/(the total quantity of cylinders)].




The methodology next proceeds to block


126


where a second portion of the stabilized catalyst temperature is calculated. The second portion of the stabilized catalyst temperature is based on the fraction of cylinders which are not being actively fueled. The fraction of cylinders which are not being actively fueled is equal to the quantity of cylinders not being actively fueled divided by the total quantity of cylinders. This fraction is multiplied by the temperature of the air after it is pumped through the engine


30


. The methodology then proceeds to block


128


.




In block


128


the methodology determines an update fraction. The update fraction controls the rate of change of the catalyst temperature from the present value to the stabilized catalyst temperature. In the particular embodiment disclosed, the update fraction is based on the flow rate of exhaust gases discharged from engine


30


and the throttle state (i.e., whether the throttle is open or closed).




In block


130


, the methodology calculates an updated catalyst temperature. The updated catalyst temperature is equal to the quantity of {[(the first portion of the stabilized catalyst temperature)+(the second portion of the second stabilized catalyst temperature)]×(update fraction)}+{(the first catalyst temperature)×[1−(the update fraction)]}.




The methodology next proceeds to block


132


to determine the stabilized catalyst temperature limit. The stabilized catalyst temperature limit is based on a predetermined catalyst temperature limit beyond which catalyst


56


should not be heated, such as 900° C. (1650° F.). The stabilized catalyst temperature limit is equal to the quantity of {(the predetermined temperature limit)−[(the first catalyst temperature)×(1−(the update fraction))]}/(the update fraction). The stabilized catalyst temperature limit represents the value of the stabilized catalyst temperature which will cause the stabilized catalyst temperature limit to equal the catalyst temperature limit.




The methodology next proceeds to block


133


where the methodology determines the effect on the stabilized catalyst temperature if no enrichment of the fuel/air ratio is made. The stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is equal to the stabilized catalyst temperature where the enrichment cooling correction term is equal to zero (as if the actual fuel/air ratio is equal to the stoichiometric fuel/air ratio).




The methodology next proceeds to decision block


134


where the methodology compares the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment to the stabilized catalyst temperature limit. If the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment does not exceed the stabilized catalyst temperature limit, no enrichment is required to maintain the temperature of catalyst


56


below the predetermined temperature limit and the methodology returns to block


102


.




If the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment exceeds the stabilized catalyst temperature limit in decision block


134


, enrichment is required to maintain the temperature of catalyst


56


at the predetermined temperature limit. The methodology then proceeds to block


136


where the methodology determines the magnitude of the required enrichment. In block


136


, the magnitude of the required enrichment is equal to [(the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment)−(the stabilized catalyst temperature limit)]/(the predetermined fuel/air correction gain). The predetermined fuel/air correction gain was used previously in block


114


.




The methodology next proceeds to block


138


where an enrichment change rate is calculated. The methodology then proceeds to decision block


140


where the enrichment change rate is compared to a predetermined change rate limit. If the enrichment change rate does not exceed the change rate limit, the methodology proceeds to block


142


where the magnitude of the required enrichment calculated in block


136


is used to enrich the fuel/air ratio (i.e., the magnitude of the enrichment made to the fuel/air ratio is equal to the required enrichment calculated in block


136


). The methodology then returns to block


102


.




If the enrichment change rate is greater than the change rate limit in decision block


140


, the methodology proceeds to block


144


where the change rate limit is used to enrich the fuel/air ratio (i.e., the magnitude of the enrichment made to the fuel/air ratio is equal to the change rate limit). The methodology then returns to block


102


.




While the invention has been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification as the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any embodiments falling within the foregoing description and the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling a temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter, the method comprising the steps of:calculating a stabilized catalyst temperature limit; determining a stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment; comparing the stabilized catalyst temperature limit with the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment; and modifying a fuel/air ratio to maintain a stabilized catalyst temperature at the stabilized catalyst temperature limit if the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is greater than the stabilized catalyst temperature limit.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying a fuel/air ratio includes the steps of:providing a fuel/air correction gain; and calculating a fuel/air change amount by which to enrich the fuel/air ratio based on the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment, the stabilized catalyst temperature limit and the fuel/air correction gain.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of calculating the fuel/air change amount includes the steps of:calculating a difference between the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and the stabilized catalyst temperature limit; and dividing the difference by the fuel/air correction gain.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising the steps of:calculating an enrichment change rate based on the fuel/air change amount; comparing the enrichment change rate to a predetermined change rate limit; and if the enrichment change rate is less than the predetermined change rate limit, modifying the fuel/air ratio by the enrichment change amount.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of modifying the fuel/air ratio by the change rate limit if the enrichment change rate is not less than the change rate limit.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating a stabilized catalyst temperature limit includes the steps of:determining a first catalyst temperature; determining an update fraction; providing a predetermined catalyst temperature limit; and calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit based on the first catalyst temperature, the update fraction and the catalyst temperature limit.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit includes the steps of:calculating a first intermediate term by subtracting the update fraction from a quantity of one (1); calculating a second intermediate term by multiplying the first intermediate term by the first catalyst temperature; calculating a third intermediate term by subtracting the second intermediate term from the temperature limit; and calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit by dividing the third intermediate term by the update fraction.
  • 8. A vehicle comprising:an internal combustion engine; an exhaust system coupled to the internal combustion engine and receiving a supply of exhaust gas discharged therefrom, the exhaust system including a catalytic converter having a catalyst; fuel/air delivery means for controlling the delivery of fuel and air to the engine at a selectively controllable ratio; a plurality of first sensors sensing various vehicle dynamics and generating a plurality of first sensor signals in response thereto; a plurality of second sensors sensing various engine dynamics and generating a plurality of second sensor signals in response thereto; a plurality of third sensors sensing various characteristics of air input to the engine and exhaust gas discharged from the engine and generating a plurality of third sensor signals in response thereto; and a controller coupled to the fuel/air delivery means and the plurality of first, second and third sensors, the controller receiving the plurality of first, second and third sensor signals and calculating a stabilized catalyst temperature limit and a stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment, the controller comparing the stabilized catalyst temperature limit with the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and modifying the fuel/air ratio to maintain a stabilized catalyst temperature at the stabilized catalyst temperature limit if the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is greater than the stabilized catalyst temperature limit.
  • 9. The vehicle of claim 8, wherein the controller calculates the fuel/air change amount by which to enrich the fuel/air ratio by calculating a difference between the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and the stabilized catalyst temperature limit and dividing the difference by a fuel/air correction gain.
  • 10. The vehicle of claim 8, wherein the controller limits a rate with which the fuel/air ratio is enriched to an amount which does not exceed a predetermined change rate limit.
  • 11. A method for controlling a temperature of a catalyst in a catalytic converter, the method comprising the steps of:determining a first catalyst temperature; determining an update fraction; providing a predetermined catalyst temperature limit; calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit based on the first catalyst temperature, the update fraction and the catalyst temperature limit; determining a stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment; comparing the stabilized catalyst temperature limit with the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment; providing a fuel/air correction gain; calculating a fuel/air change amount by which to enrich the fuel/air ratio based on the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment, the stabilized catalyst temperature limit and the fuel/air correction gain; and modifying a fuel/air ratio to maintain a stabilized catalyst temperature at the stabilized catalyst temperature limit if the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment is greater than the stabilized catalyst temperature limit.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of calculating an fuel/air change amount includes the steps of:calculating a difference between the stabilized catalyst temperature without enrichment and the stabilized catalyst temperature limit; and dividing the difference by the fuel/air correction gain.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of:calculating an enrichment change rate based on the fuel/air change amount by which to enrich the fuel/air ratio; comparing the enrichment change rate to a predetermined change rate limit; and modifying the fuel/air ratio by the fuel/air change amount if the enrichment change rate is less than the change rate limit.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of modifing the fuel/air ratio by the change rate limit if the enrichment change rate in not less than the change rate limit.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit includes the steps of:calculating a first intermediate term by subtracting the update fraction from a quantity of one (1); calculating a second intermediate term by multiplying the first intermediate term by the first catalyst temperature; calculating a third intermediate term by subtracting the second intermediate term from the temperature limit; and calculating the stabilized catalyst temperature limit by dividing the third intermediate term by the update fraction.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Other features of the present invention are discussed and claimed in commonly assigned copending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/543,123 entitled Catalyst Temperature Model.

US Referenced Citations (18)
Number Name Date Kind
5018348 Dürschmidt et al. May 1991
5414994 Cullen et al. May 1995
5606855 Tomisawa Mar 1997
5645745 Hartwick et al. Jul 1997
5722236 Cullen et al. Mar 1998
5729971 Matsuno et al. Mar 1998
5802843 Kurihara et al. Sep 1998
5802844 Lee et al. Sep 1998
5847271 Poublon et al. Dec 1998
5855113 Cullen et al. Jan 1999
5857163 Trombley et al. Jan 1999
5930993 Kammann et al. Aug 1999
5945597 Poublon et al. Aug 1999
5983628 Borroni-Bird et al. Nov 1999
5987885 Kizer et al. Nov 1999
6006153 Stander et al. Dec 1999
6050087 Kurihara et al. Apr 2000
6092368 Ishii et al. Jul 2000