Model-based logic design

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7093224
  • Patent Number
    7,093,224
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 28, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 15, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A technique for designing a logic circuit includes specifying a model. The model including combinatorial blocks, state elements and graphical library elements. The technique maintains a data structure representative of the model, and generates an architectural model and an implementation model from the data structure. The data structure represents a descriptive net list of the model. The architectural model includes C++ code and the implementation model includes Verilog.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to model-based logic design.


BACKGROUND

Microprocessor logic design typically includes an architectural stage and an implementation stage.


The architectural stage includes designing a framework of functional units that provide performance and functionality of a new microprocessor. This framework is typically captured in a text-based document. A model of the new microprocessor, represented in a high level language such as C++, is generated to verify that the function and performance requirements are met.


The implementation stage involves taking the model and the text-based document from the architectural stage and generating a Hardware Design Language (HDL) file.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a system.



FIG. 2 shows a graphical model.



FIG. 3 shows a data structure.



FIG. 4 shows a logic modeling process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a system 10 includes a computer 12, such as a personal computer (PC). The computer 12 may be connected to a network 14, such as the Internet, that runs TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) or another suitable protocol. Connections may be via Ethernet, wireless link, or telephone line.


The computer 12 contains a processor 16 and a memory 18. Memory 18 stores an operating system (O/S) 20 such as Windows2000® or Linux, a TCP/IP protocol stack 22 for communicating over network 14, and machine-executable instructions 24 executed by processor 16 to perform a logic modeling process 100 below. The computer 12 also includes an input/output (I/O) device 26 for display of a graphical user interface (GUI) 28 to a user 30 and a storage device 32 for storing a database 34.


The logic modeling process 100 executes in the computer 12. The logic modeling process 100 is a process in which a C++ model file and a Hardware Design Language (HDL) file, such as a Verilog (IEEE Standard 1364) file or a Very high speed integrated circuit Hardware Design Language (VHDL) (IEEE Standard 1076) file, are generated from a successively refined graphical model. Verilog is a hardware description language, a textual format for describing electronic circuits and systems, applied to electronic design. Verilog is used for verification through simulation, for timing analysis, for test analysis (testability analysis and fault grading) and for logic synthesis.


Referring to FIG. 2, a graphical model 50 is a pictorial model of a microprocessor design. The graphical model 50 is a tool that blends the use of textual description and graphical description of logical elements to hierarchically capture a silicon design. The use of graphics is important to “re-use” capability and for design support. The graphical model 50 is represented in database 34 to enable production of a cycle-accurate high performance simulation model as well as a synthesizable Verilog model.


The graphical model 50 includes of a set of blocks 52, interconnected by lines 54. Each of the blocks 52 represents logical elements of a device under design. The lines 54 represent connections of block inputs to block outputs. Every block in the graphical model 50 is an instance of a specific type of block. The type of block determines the relationship between a block's outputs and its inputs, states, and time. The graphical model 50 may contain any number of instances of any type of block needed to model a system.


Although not illustrated in FIG. 2, each of the blocks 52 and lines 54 are linked to a Register Transfer Diagram (RTD) descriptions allowing the user 30 to navigate and drill down to a particular place in the design quickly. This allows the user 30 to capture the design intent and then to successively refine the design. In a RTD view (not shown) of the graphical model 50 logic is color-coded. For example, state elements are shown in blue, semantically correct combinatorial logic is shown in green, common blocks describing pipe stages are shown in white, ports identifying inputs/outputs of the RTD are shown in yellow, and library elements with correctly matched inputs and outputs are shown in gray. Other schemes can also be used.


Each of the blocks 52 and corresponding lines 54 are stored in the database 34. More specifically, the blocks and corresponding connections are stored in one or more data structures that represent the gates, nodes and nets of the device. The data structures provide an internal list or description of a net list of the device is stored in the database 34.


Referring to FIG. 3, an exemplary data structure 60 implemented in C++ and stored in the database 34 and representing an exemplary description of a graphic model includes M-Gate (62), M_Pin (64), M_Net (66) and M_node (68), where “M” represents Model. The data structure may be implemented, for example, as a linked list or binary tree.


The M-Gate (62) represents a logical function, for example, AND, FF, FIFO, and so forth. The M_Gate (62) contains zero or more input pins (M_pin's) and zero or more output pins. Each distinct logical function in the graphical model 50 is assigned its own derived M_gate type.


The M_pin (64) represents a connection point to a gate. The connection may be either an input or output. It connects an M_gate to an M_net.


The M_node (66) represents the total extent (i.e. all bits) of a simulation state.


The M_Net (68) represents an arbitrary collection of bits within an M_node. An M_net connects one or more M_pin's together.


M-Gate (62), M_Pin (64), M_Net (66) and M_node (68) are all C++ classes in which there are multiple derived classes for each class listed above.


The data structure 60 is updated and reflects the current state of the graphical model 50. The data structure 60 is used by the logic modeling process 100 to generate an architectural model using, for example, C++ constraints, and a Verilog implementation model. Thus, a single database, i.e., the database 34, is used as generator of both an architectural and implementation model for a chip design.


Referring to FIG. 4, the logic modeling process 100 includes graphically capturing (102) combinatorial blocks, state elements and graphical library elements. Graphics elements in the library may be definable or may have predefined functions. For example, the library may contain software objects that perform the function of a FF or a latch. The library may also contain graphics elements that are undefined, i.e., that have no code associated with them.


A block in a graphical model may represent a single combinatorial element, such as a multiplexer or state element. A combinatorial block represents the functionality of several combinatorial elements or the function of several state elements.


The process 100 builds (104) a control/design analysis and checks (106) for errors. For example, process 100 determines if there are any un-terminated or inconsistent connections in the design. If any such problems are detected, process 100 issues an error message to the logic designer. The error message may specify the nature of the problem and its location within the logic design. The logic designer is then given the opportunity to correct the problem before process 100 moves forward.


The process 100 stores (108) the logic of the graphics capture in a data structure. The process 100 determines (110) whether to write an architectural model or implementation model. If an implementation model is to be written, the process 100 generates (112) Verilog using Verilog constructs to provide the implementation model.


If an architectural model is to be written, the process 100 coverts (114) the data structure into a C++ topology. The process provides (116) timing and clock domain assignments partitions (118) clock domain topologies. Each partition is coded ordered (120) and partition code provided to a C++ compiler.


Code ordering means that the logical constructs are sorted based on producer/consumer relationships. That is, a logical construct representing an element that “produces” or outputs a signal is ordered before another element that “consumes” or receives the signal as an input. By subsequently code-ordering the C++ model may be simulated as a single call model. A single call model means that each logical construct is evaluated only once per cycle. Hence, the C++ model simulator is a cycle-based simulator. The Verilog model is also written after being extracted from the data structure and is typically simulated using an event driven simulator such as ModelSim™ from Model Technology, for example.


The process writes (122) C++ files, batch files and makefiles for the architectural model. Thus, process 100 generates high performance C++ and highly efficient Verilog from the same database.


Process 100 may be implemented using one or more computer programs executing on programmable computers that each includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices.


Each such program may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. Also, the programs can be implemented in assembly or machine language. The language may be a compiled or an interpreted language.


Each computer program may be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform process 100.


Process 100 may also be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where, upon execution, instructions in the computer program cause the computer to operate in accordance with process 50.


Further aspects, features and advantages will become apparent from the following.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: generating a functional design of a logic circuit by selecting, placing, and connecting graphical elements using a graphical user interface (GUI), the graphical elements representing elements of the logic circuit, the elements comprising state elements, combinatorial logic, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic; receiving an input through the GUI; refining the functional design to represent a hardware design of the logic circuit using the input to modify the connectivity of the graphical elements; maintaining a data structure representative of the functional design; and generating an architectural, cycle-based simulation model of the functional design of the logic circuit and separate implementation hardware description language (HDL) model of the hardware design of the logic circuit from the data structure, the implementation HDL model functionally equivalent to the architectural, cycle-based simulation model.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the data structure comprises a description of a net list.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the data structure comprises: elements representing logical functions; elements representing connection points to gates; elements representing all bits of a simulation state; and elements representing an arbitrary collection of bits within the simulation state.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the elements comprise C++ classes used to generate the architectural, cycle-based simulation model.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the architectural, cycle-based simulation model comprises C++ software code.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the HDL is Verilog.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the HDL is Very high speed integrated circuit Hardware Design Language (VHDL).
  • 8. A method comprising: generating a model containing combinatorial blocks, state elements, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic using a graphical user interface (GUI), the model representing a functional design of a logic circuit; receiving an input through the GUI; refining the model to represent a hardware design of the logic circuit using the input; maintaining a descriptive net list of the model; and generating a C++ architectural, cycle-based simulation model and a functionally equivalent implementation Verilog model from the descriptive net list.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the net list comprises gates, nodes and nets.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 wherein maintaining comprises parsing and analyzing the combinatorial blocks, state elements, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic of the model.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein generating the C++ architectural, cycle-based simulation model and the functionally equivalent implementation Verilog model comprises: partitioning a topology of the net list into a plurality of partitions; and code ordering each of the partitions.
  • 12. A computer program product residing on a computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: generate a model containing combinatorial blocks, state elements, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic using a graphical user interface (GUI), the model representing a functional design of the logic circuit; receive an input through the GUI; refine the model with the input to represent a hardware design of the logic circuit; maintain a descriptive net list of the model; and generate a C++ architectural, cycle-based simulation model and a functionally equivalent implementation Verilog model from the descriptive net list.
  • 13. The computer product of claim 12, wherein the computer readable medium is a random access memory (RAM).
  • 14. The computer product of claim 12, wherein the computer readable medium is a read only memory (ROM).
  • 15. The computer product of claim 12, wherein the computer readable medium is a hard disk drive.
  • 16. A processor and memory configured to: generate a model containing combinatorial blocks, state elements, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic using a graphical user interface, the model representing a functional design of the logic circuit; refine the model to represent a hardware design of the logic circuit; maintain a descriptive net list of the model; and generate a C++ architectural, cycle-based simulation model and a functionally equivalent implementation Verilog model from the descriptive net list.
  • 17. The processor and memory of claim 16 wherein the processor and memory are incorporated into a personal computer.
  • 18. The processor and memory of claim 16 wherein the processor and memory are incorporated into a network server residing in the Internet.
  • 19. The processor and memory of claim 16 wherein the processor and memory are incorporated into a single board computer.
  • 20. A system comprising: a graphic user interface (GUI) for receiving selections of graphical elements to generate a model and displaying the model, the model containing combinatorial blocks, state elements, library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic, the model representing a functional, performance based model and a functionally equivalent implementation hardware design of a logic circuit; a maintenance process to manage a data structure representing a descriptive net list of the model; and a code generation process to generate a C++ architectural, cycle-based simulation model and a functionally equivalent implementation Verilog model from the data structure.
  • 21. The system of claim 20 wherein the data structure comprises gates, nodes and nets.
  • 22. The system of claim 20 wherein the maintenance process comprises parsing and analyzing the combinatorial blocks, state elements, reusable library elements, and elements containing textual description of logic of the model.
  • 23. The system of claim 20 wherein the code generation process comprises: partitioning a topology of the net list into a plurality of partitions; and code ordering each of the partitions.
US Referenced Citations (122)
Number Name Date Kind
4703435 Darringer et al. Oct 1987 A
4970664 Kaiser et al. Nov 1990 A
5128871 Schmitz Jul 1992 A
5212650 Hooper et al. May 1993 A
5220512 Watkins et al. Jun 1993 A
5258919 Yamanouchi et al. Nov 1993 A
5267175 Hooper Nov 1993 A
5278769 Bair et al. Jan 1994 A
5287289 Kageyama et al. Feb 1994 A
5297053 Pease et al. Mar 1994 A
5301318 Mittal Apr 1994 A
5384710 Lam et al. Jan 1995 A
5475605 Lin Dec 1995 A
5493507 Shinde et al. Feb 1996 A
5506788 Cheng et al. Apr 1996 A
5513119 Moore et al. Apr 1996 A
5544067 Rostoker et al. Aug 1996 A
5553002 Dangelo et al. Sep 1996 A
5568397 Yamashita et al. Oct 1996 A
5598347 Iwasaki Jan 1997 A
5603015 Kurosawa et al. Feb 1997 A
5604894 Pickens et al. Feb 1997 A
5629857 Brennan May 1997 A
5663662 Kurosawa Sep 1997 A
5666289 Watkins Sep 1997 A
5673198 Lawman et al. Sep 1997 A
5685006 Shiraishi Nov 1997 A
5694579 Razdan et al. Dec 1997 A
5706476 Giramma Jan 1998 A
5717928 Campmas et al. Feb 1998 A
5724250 Kerzman et al. Mar 1998 A
5757655 Shih et al. May 1998 A
5809283 Vaidyanathan et al. Sep 1998 A
5828581 Matumura Oct 1998 A
5831869 Ellis et al. Nov 1998 A
5841663 Sharma et al. Nov 1998 A
5852564 King et al. Dec 1998 A
5889677 Yasuda et al. Mar 1999 A
5892678 Tokunoh et al. Apr 1999 A
5892682 Hasley et al. Apr 1999 A
5903469 Ho May 1999 A
5933356 Rostoker et al. Aug 1999 A
5937190 Gregory et al. Aug 1999 A
5963724 Mantooth et al. Oct 1999 A
5974242 Damarla et al. Oct 1999 A
6044211 Jain Mar 2000 A
6053947 Parson Apr 2000 A
6066179 Allan May 2000 A
6077304 Kasuya Jun 2000 A
6106568 Beausang et al. Aug 2000 A
6117183 Teranishi et al. Sep 2000 A
6120549 Goslin et al. Sep 2000 A
6132109 Gregory et al. Oct 2000 A
6135647 Balakrishnan et al. Oct 2000 A
6152612 Liao et al. Nov 2000 A
6161211 Southgate Dec 2000 A
6178541 Joly et al. Jan 2001 B1
6205573 Hasegawa Mar 2001 B1
6208954 Houtchens Mar 2001 B1
6216256 Inoue et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219822 Griestede et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226780 Bahra et al. May 2001 B1
6233540 Schaumont et al. May 2001 B1
6233723 Pribetich May 2001 B1
6234658 Houldsworth May 2001 B1
6236956 Mantooth et al. May 2001 B1
6260179 Ohsawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272671 Fakhry Aug 2001 B1
6275973 Wein Aug 2001 B1
6292931 Dupenloup Sep 2001 B1
6298468 Zhen Oct 2001 B1
6311309 Southgate Oct 2001 B1
6324678 Dangelo et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327693 Cheng et al. Dec 2001 B1
6353806 Gehlot Mar 2002 B1
6353915 Deal et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360356 Eng Mar 2002 B1
6366874 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378115 Sakurai Apr 2002 B1
6381563 O'Riordan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381565 Nakamura Apr 2002 B1
6401230 Ahanessians et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421816 Ishikura Jul 2002 B1
6438729 Ho Aug 2002 B1
6438731 Segal Aug 2002 B1
6440780 Kimura et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449762 McElvain Sep 2002 B1
6457164 Hwang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473885 Wallace Oct 2002 B1
6477683 Killian et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477688 Wallace Nov 2002 B1
6477689 Mandell et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480985 Reynolds et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487698 Andreev et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490545 Peng Dec 2002 B1
6505328 Van Ginneken et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505341 Harris et al. Jan 2003 B1
6516456 Garnett et al. Feb 2003 B1
6519742 Falk Feb 2003 B1
6519755 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6523156 Cirit Feb 2003 B1
6539536 Singh et al. Mar 2003 B1
RE38059 Yano et al. Apr 2003 E
6546528 Sasaki et al. Apr 2003 B1
6574787 Anderson Jun 2003 B1
6591407 Kaufman et al. Jul 2003 B1
20010018758 Tanaka et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020023256 Seawright Feb 2002 A1
20020038447 Kim et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042904 Ito et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046386 Skoll et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049957 Hosono et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059054 Bade et al. May 2002 A1
20020112221 Ferreri et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138244 Meyer Sep 2002 A1
20020166100 Meding Nov 2002 A1
20030004699 Choi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005396 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030016206 Taitel Jan 2003 A1
20030016246 Singh Jan 2003 A1
20030036871 Fuller et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030177455 Kaufman et al. Sep 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
0 404 482 Dec 1990 EP
0 433 066 Jun 1991 EP
0 720 233 Jul 1996 EP
0 901 088 Mar 1999 EP
1 065 611 Jan 2001 EP
58-060559 Apr 1983 JP
03-225523 Oct 1991 JP
07-049890 Feb 1995 JP
08-314892 Nov 1996 JP
2001-068994 Mar 2001 JP
WO 9837475 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9855879 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9939268 Aug 1999 WO
WO0065492 Nov 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030046649 A1 Mar 2003 US