Modification and compositions of human secretoglobin proteins

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12162914
  • Patent Number
    12,162,914
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 5, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 10, 2024
    12 days ago
Abstract
Novel compositions of recombinant human CC10 protein have been generated by chemically modifying the pure protein in vitro. Several new synthetic preparations containing isoforms of chemically modified rhCC10 have been generated by processes that utilize reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species. These preparations contain novel isoforms of rhCC10 which have been characterized with enhanced or altered biological properties compared to the unmodified protein. Preparations containing novel isoforms may be used as standards to identify and characterize naturally occurring isoforms of native CC10 protein from blood or urine and ultimately to measure new CC10-based biomarkers to assess patient disease status. These preparations may also be used to treat respiratory, autoimmune, inflammatory, and other medical conditions that are not effectively treated with the unmodified protein.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention pertains to chemically or enzymatically modified preparations of synthetic secretoglobins that have altered or enhanced properties compared to the unmodified versions. More specifically, modification of recombinant human secretoglobin proteins using reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), enzyme catalyzed modification such as myeloperoxidase plus hydrogen peroxide, or transglutaminase catalyzed modification. The invention further pertains to characterization of new isoforms of modified secretoglobins, optimized processes for modifying secretoglobins, and isolation of secretoglobin isoforms. The term “isoform” herein refers to a secretoglobin or CC10 monomer, dimer, or other multimer complex that contains intact monomers of at least 60 amino acids in length that contain one or more chemically modified amino acids. The invention further pertains to alteration of the biological activity, change in the structural conformation, or biochemical properties of a secretoglobin by chemical or enzymatic modification of one or more of its amino acids. The invention further pertains to enhancing the anti-viral activity of rhCC10 through chemical modification with ROS, RNS, and enzyme-catalyzed amino acid modification. The invention further pertains to enhancing the inhibition of neutrophil migration by rhCC10 through chemical modification with ROS, RNS, and enzyme-catalyzed amino acid modification.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Secretoglobins are a family of structurally related proteins comprised of four helical bundle monomers that form disulfide dimers, tetramers and higher multimers. There are 8 known human secretoglobins (FIG. 1) and the Clara Cell 10 kDa protein (CC10), also known as uteroglobin, Clara Cell 16 kDa protein (CC16), Clara Cell secretory protein (CCSP), blastokinin, urine protein-1, and secretoglobin 1A1 (SCGB1A1), is the most abundant and well-known member of the family. Secretoglobins and CC10 are believed to exist in all vertebrate animals. Based on what is known of CC10, secretoglobins are thought to play a role in regulating immune responses, although the physiologic roles and specific mechanisms of these proteins, including CC10 remain unknown.


The primary source of CC10 in mammals is the pulmonary and tracheal epithelia, especially the non-ciliated bronchiolar airway epithelial cells (primarily Clara cells), and it is the most abundant locally-produced protein in the extracellular fluids of the adult lung. It is also secreted in the nasal epithelia. CC10 is also present in serum and urine, which is largely derived from pulmonary sources. CC10 is also produced by reproductive tissues (uterus, seminal vesicles), exocrine glands (prostate, mammary gland, pancreas), endocrine glands (thyroid, pituitary, adrenal, and ovary) and by the thymus and spleen (Mukherjee, 1999; Mukherjee, 2007). The major recoverable form of human CC10 in vivo is a homodimer, comprised of two identical 70 amino acid monomers, with an isoelectric point of 4.7-4.8. Its molecular weight is 15.8 kDa, although it migrates on SDS-PAGE at an apparent molecular weight of 10-12 kDa. In the native homodimer, the monomers are arranged in an antiparallel configuration, with the N-terminus of one adjacent to the C-terminus of the other and are connected by two disulfide bonds between Cys3 of one monomer and Cys69 of the other monomer (Mukherjee, 1999).


There are many chemical and enzymatic processes that modify amino acid residues on proteins. The secretoglobins undergo cleavage of N-terminal signal peptides, which is an integral part of the secretion process in mammalian cells. But they are not known to be glycosylated or lipidated. However, secretoglobins are subjected to the same processes that affect all other proteins in the extracellular milieu during an inflammatory response. Native CC10 is chemically modified in vivo and new forms of native CC10 have been identified in patient samples that are not present in samples from normal humans (Lindhal, 1999; Ramsay, 2001; Ariaz-Martinez, 2012). The modifications are presumed to be caused by inflammatory processes, since the new forms have only been identified in airway lining fluid (ALF) samples from patients with respiratory conditions characterized by ongoing or acute inflammation. Although some have speculated that the modifications to CC10 are the result of reactions with reactive oxygen species generated by the inflammatory response, the nature of the modifications is presently unknown. Furthermore, oxidative modification to native CC10 is thought to represent damage to the protein that impairs its anti-inflammatory activity and immunomodulatory function, thereby contributing to the development of chronic lung disease in premature infants who experience respiratory distress (Ramsay, 2001).


Synthetic CC10 protein may be made by recombinant or chemical synthetic methods (Barnes, 1996; Mantile, 1993; Nicolas, 2005). CC10 is the most well-known member of a family of structurally related proteins collectively called secretoglobins (Klug, 2000). The amino acid sequences for the mature secreted sequences of eight human secretoglobins are shown in FIG. 1. The N-termini are predictions based on consensus signal peptide cleavage sites and have not been confirmed by N-terminal sequencing of the native proteins. All secretoglobins share a conserved four helical bundle secondary structure and, therefore, generally believed to mediate similar physiological functions.


Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are generated as a part of chronic inflammatory processes associated with aging and disease, or as a result of severe inflammatory responses to combat infections and other acute insults, such as smoke inhalation. Common ROS and RNS chemical reagents that mediate protein oxidation in vivo include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Fe2+, Cu1+, glutathione, HOCl, HOBr, 1O2, and ONOO. ROS and RNS may be synthesized or released in vivo as a result of enzyme activity, such as myeloperoxidase, xanthine oxidase, and P-450 enzymes, and oxidative burst activity of activated phagocytic cells. Lipid peroxides such as 4-hydroxy-2-trans-nonenal (HNE), (MDA), and acrolein are the products of reactions of ROS and RNS with lipids that are, in turn, highly reactive and can form adducts with proteins. Ozone and UV light, as well as gamma irradiation in the presence of O2 and mitochondrial electron transport chain leakage, also cause protein oxidation.


ROS and RNS are indiscriminate chemically reactive agents that destroy essential biological components including nucleic acids, lipids (including membrane and surfactant phospholipids), and proteins, in both the pathogen and host, often causing significant tissue damage that may be more life-threatening than the original infection or other cause of the inflammatory response. For example, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often triggered by an acute lung infection (pneumonia) that results in the release of ROS and RNS, and typically has a 40-60% mortality rate due to pulmonary tissue damage that compromises lung function, even after the pathogen causing the infection is brought under control using anti-microbial agents.


There are several types of oxidative protein modifications, the most common of which is sulfur oxidation in which disulfide bonds between cysteines (Cys), S-thiolation, and methionine (Met) sulfoxide are formed. Protein carbonyl groups are also common oxidative modifications in which amino acid side chains are converted to aldehydes and ketones, especially lysine (Lys) arginine (Arg), and proline (Pro). Aliphatic amino acids may be converted to their hydro(pero)xy derivatives. Chloramines and deaminations may occur. Certain amino acids may be converted into other amino acids, such as histidine (His) to asparagine (Asn), while others may form lipid peroxidation adducts, amino acid oxidation adducts (eg. p-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde), and glycoxidation adducts (eg. carboxymethyllysine). At a macroscopic protein level, cross-links, aggregation, and peptide bond cleavage may occur as a result of exposure to ROS and RNS.


There 12 amino acids that are modified in vivo by ROS and RNS into several physiologic oxidation products, as shown in Table 1. In general, amino acids cysteine (Cys) and methionine (Met) are the most susceptible to oxidation and, unlike oxidation of other amino acids, the oxidation of Met and Cys are reversible (methionine sulfoxide reductase and glutathione and thioredoxin redox systems) (Stadtman, 2002).









TABLE 1







Amino acid modifications caused by ROS and RNS











Number




per CC10


Amino Acid
Physiological oxidation products
monomer





Cysteine (Cys)
Disulfides, glutathiolation, HNE-Cys
2


Methionine (Met)
Methionine sulfoxide
4


Tyrosine (Tyr)
Dityrosine, nitrotyrosine, chlorotyrosines,
1



dopa


Phenylalanine
Tyrosine (hydroxyphenylalanine)
2


(Phe)


Valine (Val) &
Peroxides (hydroxides)
9


Leucine (Leu)


Glutamate (Glu)
Oxalic acid, pyruvic acid
6


Proline (Pro)
Hydroxyproline, pyrrolidone, glutamic
4



semialdehyde


Threonine (Thr)
2-amino-3-ketobutyric acid
3


Arginine (Arg)
Glutamic semialdehyde, chloramines
3


Lysine (Lys)
a-aminoadipic semialdehyde, chloramines,
5



MDA-Lys, HNE-Lys, acrolein-Lys,



carboxymethyllysine, pHA-Lys


Tryptophan (Trp)
Hydroxytryptophan, Nitro-tryptophan,
0



kynurenines


Histidine (His)
2-oxohistidine, asparagine, aspartate,
0



HNE-His









Modification of secretoglobins may also be mediated enzymatically, not just by the downstream effects of ROS and RNS generated by enzymes such as MPO, but also by transglutaminase enzymes (TGs). TGs are ubiquitous in nature, found in all forms of life from microbes to mammals. TGs are essential to several inter- and intracellular processes in mammals, including extracellular matrix synthesis, neutrophil and monocyte adhesion and motility, receptor endocytosis, pinocytosis, antigen uptake and processing, blood clotting, G-protein signaling, and apoptosis (reviewed in Lorand, 2003). TGs are multi-functional enzymes that mediate at least one main enzymatic activity; the classical transglutaminase activity in which a glutamine residue in one protein serves as an acyl donor and a lysine residue in a second protein serves as the acyl acceptor. TGs also mediate deamidation and esterification of proteins, as well as the creation and rearrangement of disulfide bonds between cysteine residues. None of these activities has an energy requirement and the only cofactor necessary is calcium.


Transglutaminases play a significant role in inflammation and immunity, particularly TG2 or tissue transglutaminase. It is present mostly in the cytoplasm but a portion of the enzyme is associated with the membrane on the cell surface and is known to be a coreceptor for fibronectin. TGs have also been shown to cross-link proteins to specific lipid moieties in membranes, allowing a lipid barrier to be created on a structural protein scaffold in skin (Lesort, 2000; Nemes, 1999). More recently, the emerging role of TGs in viral infection has been recognized (reviewed in Jeon, 2006). Intracellular TG2 is normally present in an inactive state and is activated by oxidative stress and calcium mobilization resulting from viral infection. Activated intracellular TG2 mediates its anti-viral activities via direct modification/inactivation of viral proteins, as well as modification of cellular proteins required for viral entry, replication, assembly, or transport. CC10 has been previously shown to be a substrate for TG2 (Mukherjee, 1988). CC10 is cross-linked to other CC10 molecules by TG2, to form covalently attached multimers and aggregates observed on SDS-PAGE gels and Western blots. However, no other TG-mediated reaction products of CC10 or other secretoglobin have been characterized.


OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

The foregoing provides a non-exclusive list of the objectives achieved by the present invention:


A primary object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobin (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic CC10 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB3A2 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB3A1 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB2A1 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB2A2 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB1D1 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB1D2 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic SCGB1D4 (whether made by recombinant or chemical methods).


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more methionine sulfoxides.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more cysteine glutathiolates.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more HNE-cysteines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more nitrotyrosines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more di-tyrosines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more carbonyl groups.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing a combination of two or more modified amino acids selected from the groups consisting of methionine sulfoxide, nitrotyrosine, or di-tyrosine.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more chlorotyrosines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more hydroxyprolines, pyrrolidones, or glutamic semialdehydes.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more 2-amino-3-ketobutyric acids.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more chloramines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more □-aminoadipic semialdehyde, chloramines, MDA-Lys, HNE-Lys, acrolein-Lys, carboxymethyllysine, or pHA-Lys.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more hydroxytryptophan, nitro-tryptophan, or kynurenines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more valine or leucine peroxides.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more oxalic or pyruvic acids.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more hydroxyphenylalanines.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more glutamic semialdehydes.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter comprised of a modified synthetic secretoglobin containing one or more 2-oxohistidine or HNE-His.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin and an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobin, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are the same secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin and an oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobin, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are not the same secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination two or more oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobins, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are the same secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination two or more oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobins, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are not the same secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination one or more unmodified synthetic secretoglobin and one or more oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobins, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are the same secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a composition of matter containing a combination one or more unmodified synthetic secretoglobin and one or more oxidatively or enzymatically modified synthetic secretoglobins, wherein the unmodified and modified preparations are not the same secretoglobin.


A secondary object of the invention is a pharmaceutical composition containing a modified synthetic secretoglobin that can be used as a therapeutic agent.


A further object of the invention is a pharmaceutical composition containing a combination of two or more modified synthetic secretoglobins that can be used as a therapeutic agent.


A further object of the invention is a pharmaceutical composition containing a combination of unmodified and modified synthetic secretoglobins that can be used as a therapeutic agent.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic secretoglobin to a patient with an inflammatory condition or a viral infection.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic secretoglobin to a patient with a respiratory disease or condition, an autoimmune disease or condition, a fibrotic condition, a metabolic disease, an infectious disease, or any acute or chronic inflammatory condition or disease.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic secretoglobin to a patient any condition characterized by a deficiency of the native secretoglobin isoform corresponding to the modified synthetic secretoglobin to be administered.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic secretoglobin to treat or prevent a severe exacerbation of an underlying condition in a patient with an underlying chronic disease or condition.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic CC10 to a patient with an inflammatory condition or a viral infection.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic CC10 to a patient with a respiratory disease or condition, an autoimmune disease or condition, a fibrotic condition, a metabolic disease, an infectious disease, or any acute or chronic inflammatory condition or disease.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic CC10 to a patient any condition characterized by a deficiency of the native CC10 isoform corresponding to the modified synthetic CC10 to be administered.


It is a further object of the invention to administer a modified synthetic CC10 to treat or prevent a severe exacerbation of an underlying condition in a patient with an underlying chronic disease or condition.


It is another object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin that can be used to develop a diagnostic assay to evaluate patient samples.


It is further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin as a standard that can be used in a diagnostic assay to evaluate patient samples.


It is further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic CC10 that can be used to develop a diagnostic assay to evaluate patient samples.


It is a further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic CC10 in a standard that can be used in a diagnostic assay to evaluate patient samples.


It is a further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin as a standard to enable the purification of a modified native secretoglobin from a biological source such as blood, urine, or tissue.


It is a further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin as a standard to enable the development of a process to purify of a modified native secretoglobin from a biological source such as blood, urine, or tissue.


It is a further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin as a standard to monitor a process to purify of a modified native secretoglobin from a biological source such as blood, urine, or tissue.


It is a further object of the invention to use a modified synthetic secretoglobin as a standard to control the quality of a modified native secretoglobin purified from a biological source such as blood, urine, or tissue.


A further object of the invention is a process in which chemical oxidation is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which a reactive oxygen species (ROS) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which a reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which hypochlorite (HOCl) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which metachloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin is converted into a modified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate by oxidation mediated by contact with a metal ion.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin is converted into a modified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate by oxidation mediated by contact with a nickel ion.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin is converted into a modified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate by oxidation mediated by contact with an iron ion.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin is converted into a modified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate by oxidation mediated by contact with a copper ion.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate of an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin is converted into a modified synthetic secretoglobin or secretoglobin purification intermediate by oxidation mediated by contact with a cobalt ion.


A further object of the invention is a process in which an enzyme is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which myeloperoxidase is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which transglutaminase is used to convert an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin into a modified synthetic secretoglobin.


A further object of the invention is a process in which transglutaminase is used to attach a label, chemical, lipid, or peptide moiety to an unmodified synthetic secretoglobin.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to chemical and/or enzymatic modification of synthetic secretoglobins in order to alter or enhance biological or biochemical properties compared to the unmodified versions. Chemical reagents such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), or enzymes such as myeloperoxidase or transglutaminase, are used to achieve the amino acid modifications. The addition of lipid and other moieties to secretoglobins is also mediated by TGs. The invention further relates to optimization of chemical or enzyme-mediated processes to achieve amino acid modifications, as well as biochemical and physical characterization of mixtures of modified secretoglobins, and isolation and characterization of individual secretoglobin isoforms. The term “isoform” herein refers to a secretoglobin monomer, dimer, or other multimer complex that contains monomer units of at least 60 amino acids in length, but preferably full length monomers that are at least 75% identical to the amino acid sequences shown in FIG. 1 that contain one or more chemically modified amino acids. Biological properties including, but not limited to, inhibition of viral replication and inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis may be altered or enhanced in the chemically modified secretoglobin mixtures and isoforms.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1: Amino acid sequences of secretoglobins


The amino acid sequences of the monomer forms of eight human secretoglobins are shown. All sequences were taken from Genebank and signal peptides of the translation products have been removed to show the predicted N-termini of each monomer. All secretoglobins share a conserved four helical bundle secondary structure and form homodimers, heterodimers, tetramers, and large multimers.



FIG. 2: HPLC pattern of rhCC10 reacted with NaOCl


Preparations of unmodified rhCC10 (panel A) and rhCC10 reacted with increasing amounts of NaOCl oxidant equivalents (panels B-E) were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC using a C-18 column. The arrow points to the unmodified rhCC10 peak in reaction mixtures. Approximately 25 mcg of protein was loaded for each HPLC run shown. Panel A-E depict HPLC analysis of NaOCl oxidation products.



FIG. 3: SDS-PAGE of rhCC10 NaOCl reactions


A 10-20% tricine SDS-PAGE gel was used. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of NaOCl; numbers of oxidant equivalents are shown for each lane. All samples, each containing ˜5 mcg protein, were reduced with 1 mM DTT in SDS loading buffer and heated to 65° C. for 15 minutes prior to gel loading.



FIG. 4: Isoelectric focusing (IEF) of rhCC10 NaOCl reactions


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of NaOCl; numbers of oxidant equivalents are shown for each lane. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 5: Western blot of IEF gel of rhCC10 NaOCl reactions using anti-rhCC10 antibody


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7 and was blotted to PVDF membrane, then probed with a Protein-A purified rabbit polyclonal antibody prepared using unmodified rhCC10 as the antigen. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with NaOCl reaction conditions shown in lane descriptions. All samples contain −25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 6: Western blot of DNPH-treated rhCC10 NaOCl reactions using anti-DNP antibody


A 10-20% tricine SDS-PAGE gel was run on the modified rhCC10 preparations. NaOCl reaction products were run alongside MPO and mCPBA reaction products. The gel was blotted to PVDF then probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-DNP antibody (commercially available). Samples were not reduced but were mixed with SDS PAGE loading buffer and heated to 65° C. for 15 minutes prior to loading. Unmodified rhCC10 and MPO and mCPBA reaction products were not recognized by the antibody under the conditions used. Only the NaOCl reaction products contained detectable DNP, indicating the presence of carbonyl groups in these preparations.



FIG. 7: HPLC analysis of mCPBA oxidation products


Preparations of unmodified rhCC10 (FIG. 7, panel A) and rhCC10 reacted with increasing amounts of mCPBA oxidant equivalents (FIG. 7, panels B-E) were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC using a C-18 column. The arrow points to the unmodified rhCC10 peak in reaction mixtures. Approximately 25 mcg of protein in each sample was loaded for each HPLC run shown.



FIG. 8: Isoelectric focusing of rhCC10 mCPBA reactions


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of mCPBA; numbers of oxidant equivalents are shown for each lane and two different temperatures were tested. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 9: Western blot of IEF gel of rhCC10 mCPBA reactions using anti-rhCC10 antibody


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7 and was blotted to PVDF membrane, then probed with Protein-A purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against rhCC10. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of mCPBA; numbers of oxidant equivalents are shown for each lane and two different temperatures were tested. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 10: Isoelectric focusing of rhCC10 mCPBA reactions; additional conditions


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with mCPBA under additional conditions, including the presence of CaCl2) and comparison of much higher numbers of oxidant equivalents. All samples contain −25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 11: Purification & mass spectral analysis of mCPBA reaction products: CC10 isoforms


C-18 RP-HPLC was used to separate each of eight individual CC10 isoforms represented as different peaks from the mCBPA reaction mixture. In this example, peak #3 (FIG. 11, panel B) was collected, rerun on the HPLC to estimate purity, then sent for mass spectral analysis (electrospray ionization method). The arrow points out the peak that was purified in this example. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Results of ESI-MS analysis are shown in Panel D.



FIG. 12: Optimization of MPO—H2O2 reaction; Effect of CaCl2)


MPO-H2O2 reactions with and without 2 mM CaCl2) (respectively panels A, B, D and panels C, E) were compared using C-18 RP-HPLC to monitor reactions. All reactions were performed in the dark in citrate buffer at pH 5.0 with 50 oxidant equivalents of H2O2 at 37° C. for a total of 60 minutes. Arrows point out peaks corresponding to unmodified rhCC10. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein.



FIG. 13 (panels A-E): HPLC analysis of MPO-H2O2 oxidation products


MPO-H2O2 reactions with 2 mM CaCl2) (panels B-E). were monitored using C-18 RP-HPLC with increasing amounts of MPO and H2O2. All reactions were performed in the dark in citrate buffer at pH 5.0 with 50 oxidant equivalents of H2O2 at 37° C. for a total of 30 minutes. Arrows point out peaks corresponding to unmodified rhCC10. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein.



FIG. 14: Isoelectric focusing of rhCC10 MPO and H2O2 reactions


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of MPO. All reactions were performed in the dark in citrate buffer at pH 5.0 with 50 oxidant equivalents of H2O2 at 37° C. for a 1 or 24 hours. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 15: Western blot of IEF gels of rhCC10 MPO and H2O2 reactions using anti-rhCC10 antibody


The IEF gel covered pH range from 3-7 and was blotted to PVDF membrane, then probed with Protein-A purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against rhCC10. Preparations of rhCC10 modified with increasing amounts of MPO. All reactions were performed in the dark in citrate buffer at pH 5.0 with 50 oxidant equivalents of H2O2 at 37° C. for a 1 or 24 hours. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Samples were not reduced, exposed to SDS, or heated prior to gel loading.



FIG. 16 (panels A-D): Purification and mass spectral analysis of a CC10 isoform from a MPO-H2O2 reaction


C-18 RP-HPLC was used to separate each of eight individual CC10 isoforms represented as different peaks, numbered 9-17, from the MPO-H2O2 reaction mixture (panel B). In this example, peak #10 was collected, rerun on the HPLC to estimate purity, then sent for mass spectral analysis (electrospray ionization method). The arrow points out the peak that was purified in this example. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein. Results of ESI-MS analysis are shown in Panel D.



FIG. 17: (panels A-E) HPLC analysis of peroxynitrite oxidation products


Reactions of rhCC10 with peroxynitrite were monitored using C-18 RP-HPLC with increasing numbers of oxidant equivalents (panels B-E). Reactions were performed in water at room temperature in the dark for 1 hour. The arrow points out the peak corresponding to unmodified rhCC10. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein.



FIG. 18 (panels A-H): Effects of pH and CaCl2) on peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation of rhCC10


Reactions of rhCC10 with peroxynitrite in the presence of CaCl2) (panels A,C,E,G) and absence of CaCl2) (panels B,D,F,H) and at different pHs were monitored using C-18 RP-HPLC with increasing numbers of oxidant equivalents. Reactions were performed using 10 oxidant equivalents at room temperature in the dark for 1 hour. Arrows point out peaks corresponding to unmodified rhCC10. All samples contain ˜25 mcg protein.



FIG. 19: Western blot analysis of peroxynitrite reaction products


A 10-20% tricine SDS-PAGE gel was run on the modified rhCC10 preparations. The gel was blotted to PVDF then probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibody (commercially available). Samples containing 10 mcg protein were not reduced but were mixed with SDS PAGE loading buffer and heated to 65° C. for 15 minutes prior to loading. Unmodified rhCC10 was not recognized by the antibody.



FIG. 20: Secretoglobin reaction products of ROS and RNS detected with rhCC10 protein


Schematic diagrams of oxidative modification reaction products observed with rhCC10; addition of oxygen to methionine, addition of nitro group to tyrosine, formation of carbonyl groups that are reactive with DNPH.



FIG. 21: Modification of rhCC10 by transglutaminase


Western blot of in vitro reactions of rhCC10 using TG2+4.5 mM calcium with two different biotinylated amine compounds. The reactions were performed in 25 mM Tris/150 mM NaCl pH 8.0 with 1.5 mM DTT at using 5 micro-units of TG2 enzyme at 37° C. for 60 minutes. Reactions were run on a 10-20% SDS-PAGE tricine gel, blotted to PVDF membrane, and probed with streptavidin-HRP conjugate, which recognizes the biotin. All lanes contain reducing agent to eliminate disulfide bonds.



FIGS. 22A-B: Enhanced inhibition of viral replication by modified rhCC10


Neutral red assay indicating cell survival with and without infection by two strains of influenza (H1N1: Neutral Red Assay, FIG. 22A and H5N1: Neutral Red Assay, FIG. 22B) and in the presence of 1 mg/ml unmodified and modified rhCC10.



FIGS. 23A-23C:Enhanced inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis by modified rhCC10 ROS and RNS products


Fluorescence measurements of migrated differentiated PLB-985 cells differentiated in the presence of 100 mcg/ml of unmodified rhCC10 (CC10-A), NaOCl-modified rhCC10 (CC10-B), and mCBPA-modified rhCC10 (CC10-C).



FIG. 24A-C: Modification of CC10 by exposure to metal



FIG. 24 A: Amino acid sequences of two versions of recombinant human CC10 protein, FIG. 24 B: Overview of the purification process for T2-CC10 protein that includes IMAC. The hCC10 is in the His tagged USL fusion protein above the dotted line and is free T2 CC10 monomer and dimer below the dotted line. Abbreviations: polyethylenimine; Ni-IMAC: Nickel immobilized metal affinity chromatography: NMWCO: nominal molecular wight cutoff; UBL: ubiquitin like, and



FIG. 24 C: Far Western blot demonstrating SDC4-binding biological activity enhanced by oxidative modification achieved by processes that involve exposure to either ROS/RNS or to metal ions.





DEFINITIONS

Secretoglobin: A type of protein that includes human and non-human proteins in the CC10 family having the conserved four helical bundle motif and ranging in size from about 50-100 amino acids in length. Human secretoglobins are shown in FIG. 1.


Synthetic secretoglobin: A secretoglobin that is made by chemical or recombinant process and not isolated from a natural source.


Unmodified secretoglobin protein: A secretoglobin monomer, dimer, or other multimer that does not contain chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues, other than spontaneously occurring disulfide bonds between cysteine residues in homodimers and heterodimers.


Unmodified CC10 protein: A CC10 monomer, dimer, or other multimer that does not contain chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues, other than disulfide bonds between cysteine residues.


Modified secretoglobin: A secretoglobin monomer, dimer, or other multimer, that contains one or more chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues.


Modified synthetic secretoglobin: A synthetic secretoglobin monomer, dimer, or other multimer, that contains one or more chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues.


Modified CC10: A CC10 monomer, dimer, or other multimer, that contains one or more chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues.


Modified recombinant human CC10: A CC10 monomer that is made by recombinant DNA methods and contains one or more chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues.


Modified synthetic CC10: A CC10 monomer made by either recombinant DNA or chemical peptide synthetic methods that contains one or more chemically or enzymatically modified amino acid residues.


Modified amino acid residues: An amino acid in a protein whose side chain has been modified from the form originally present upon completion of translation of the protein.


The chemical structure of the 20 natural unmodified amino acids found in proteins can be found in any biochemistry textbook.


Carbonyl group: An aldehyde or ketone group on an amino acid side chain.


ABBREVIATIONS





    • CC10: Clara cell 10 kDa protein; aka CC16, CCSP, uteroglobin, urine protein-1

    • SCGB: Secretoglobin

    • RNS: reactive nitrogen species

    • ROS: reactive oxygen species

    • MPO: myeloperoxidase enzyme

    • iNOS: intracellular nitric oxide synthase

    • mCPBA: meta-choloroperbenzoic acid

    • DNP: 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazone

    • DNPH: 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine

    • HNE: 4-hydroxy-2-trans-nonenal (HNE); a lipid peroxidation product

    • MDA: malanodialdehyde





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The modification of secretoglobins by ROS, RNS, and enzymatic activity such as MPO and TG2 has not been investigated in detail. Preliminary reports suggest that native CC10 is modified during acute inflammatory responses in vivo, such as in respiratory distress, giving rise to new isoforms thus far identified by cross-reactivity with anti-CC10 antibodies and isoelectric points different from unmodified CC10 (pI˜4.8), which is the predominant form in biological fluid samples. It has also been reported that CC10 is a substrate for tissue transglutaminase in vitro. Other than the role for Cys residues in stabilizing multimers and controlling access to the central hydrophobic cavity, there is no known physiological role for oxidation of any amino acid in any secretoglobin. We believe that reversible oxidation of Cys and Met residues is a protective physiologic mechanism by which CC10 and other secretoglobins are able to scavenge harmful ROS from the local environment, thereby sparing tissue during an inflammatory response. We further believe that the oxidation status of Cys and Met residues in secretoglobins affects the biochemical and biological properties but does not represent protein damage that results in loss of function, rather the properties and function of the oxidized secretoglobins are modulated. Likewise, oxidative and/or enzymatic modification of other secretoglobin amino acids such as tyrosine, lysine, glutamine, valine, leucine, phenylalanine, glutamate, arginine, threonine, proline, histidine, and tryptophan do not represent protein damage, but rather modulate biochemical and biological properties that enable different or enhanced activities.


The majority of known, specific ROS, RNS, and MPO-mediated amino acid modifications are associated with protein damage and loss of function. Accumulation of oxidized protein is associated with disease and aging processes (Berlett and Stadtman, 1997). However, recognition of reversible oxidation is emerging as a regulatory mechanism for modifying protein function and not just a form of damage that inactivates proteins. All eight human secretoglobins contain Cys residues that are believed to typically exist in a naturally oxidized state in which disulfide bonds between conserved cysteines at the N- and C-termini stabilize homo- and hetero-dimers, tetramers, and higher multimers. All cysteines in secretoglobins are potentially susceptible to oxidation and the formation of intra- or intermolecular disulfide bonds, particularly the respiratory secretoglobins, CC10, SCGB3A1, and SCGB3A2. The disulfide bonds between N- and C-terminal Cys in CC10 certainly stabilize the homodimer in conditions that would otherwise break apart the dimer into monomers, such as in non-reducing SDS-PAGE conditions. Similarly, the internal Cys of SCGB3A2 (Cys60 of the sequence shown in FIG. 1) stabilizes the homodimer in vitro. No particular functionality is ascribed to the dimer versus the monomer or other multimers of CC10 or SCGB3A2. However, since CC10 and SCGB3A2 both form homodimers spontaneously in vitro without any requirement for an oxidizing agent, it has not been possible to evaluate differences in biochemical properties or biological activities of forms other than the dimer. These homodimers are very stable in vitro, although there is an equilibrium between monomer and dimer in any given aqueous environment and it is possible to change buffer conditions to favor a higher percentage of monomer and/or tetramer with respect to dimer. Despite that the dimer is the initial form administered to humans and animals, numerous reducible and non-reducible forms can be recovered from biological fluids (Antico, 2006). Physiologically, the in vivo glutathione redox system in the lungs likely mediates reversible oxidation of disulfide bonds in the respiratory secretoglobins and other secretoglobins that may be found in the lungs.


A physiological role for CC10 has been proposed to be the scavenging of toxic or otherwise harmful hydrophobic moieties that may be taken up and bound into the central hydrophobic cavity and thereby removed from the local tissue environment (Peter, 1992; Hard, 1995; Umland, 1992; 1994). The disulfide bonds between the Cys residues (Cys3 and Cys69) of the monomer components in each CC10 dimer are believed to act like a gate that opens and closes by reversible oxidation of the Cys residues to form and break the disulfide bonds to allow entry of a hydrophobic moiety into the central hydrophobic cavity, then trap it there. Several studies have reported the strong binding of putative in vivo CC10 ligands such as a polychlorinated biphenyls and progesterone, inside the dimer and that specific residues such as Phe6 and Tyr21 stabilize ligand binding (Callebaut, 2000).


All secretoglobins contain significant proportions of amino acids that are susceptible to oxidative and enzymatic amino acid modification. Each 70 amino acid monomer of CC10 contains a total of 42 amino acids (out of 70; >50%), listed in Table 1, that can be oxidized by physiologic processes involving ROS and RNS, leaving open the possibility of a large number of ROS and RNS reaction products, aka isoforms. TG can also be used to attach lipid or other moieties to secretoglobins via their glutamine, lysine, and cysteine residues, and not just cross-link secretoglobins to other proteins. As illustrated in the following examples, we have herein found this to be the case with rhCC10, in which oxidative and enzymatic modifications give rise to multiple isoforms that can be isolated and characterized. Preparations containing oxidatively modified rhCC10 also mediated enhanced of inhibition of viral replication and neutrophil chemotaxis, representing significant improvements on the existing unmodified CC10 drug preparation. Furthermore, the use of rhCC10 preparations modified in vitro as standards to assess CC10 isoforms contained within, or isolated from, biological samples, enables the evaluation of native CC10 isoforms as biomarkers of pulmonary status in chronic diseases and acute conditions. Thus, in the absence of oxidative or enzymatic amino acid modification, a secretoglobin may have no effect on a particular cell type, but has a different effect after modification because the modification enabled or disabled binding to a cell surface receptor, cell signaling molecule, lipid, ligand, structural protein, or other intra- or extracellular component. The effects of oxidative and/or enzymatic amino acid modification on the biochemical and biological properties of secretoglobins, therefore, opens up new possibilities for the use of modified secretoglobins in mediating pharmacological effects not previously possible using unmodified preparations, as well as for use as standards to evaluate novel isoforms of native secretoglobins as biomarkers of disease status in various patients, including, but not limited to patients with cancer, respiratory diseases, autoimmune diseases, acute or chronic infections, allergies, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hematologic disorders, and exposures to smoke, chemical pollutants, toxins or other insult.


EXAMPLES
Example 1: Chemical Modification of rhCC10 by ROS: Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl)

Each reaction was initiated at ˜4° C. (on ice) by adding NaOCl (9.2 □L; 0.05% solution in water, 62.1 nmol, 5 equivalents) to a solution of the protein (0.2 mg, 12.42 nmol) in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 or plain water, mixing briefly and incubating on ice for 15 minutes in the dark (total volume of 0.2 mL). The reaction was quenched by adding L-methionine (9.3 □L; 10 mM in water, 93.15 nmol), then incubated for 20 min and warmed to room temperature.


Several reactions were performed using equivalents of the oxidant (“oxidant equivalents”) ranging from 1-100 FIG. 2, panels B-E. Oxidation of rhCC10 was monitored using HPLC, in which new modified isoforms appeared as new HPLC peaks, eluting earlier than unmodified rhCC10, as shown in FIG. 2. Reactions were concentrated by Speedvac and then resuspended in water. Approximately 25 □g of each sample was injected onto the HPLC column (VYDAC Polymeric C18 column 300A 5□m, 2.1 mm×250 mm, Cat #218TP52) on an Agilent 1100 system using a mobile phase as follows: A: water; B: 95% acetonitrile+5% water (both containing 0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Output was monitored by UV absorption at 214 nm.


Increasing the number of oxidant equivalents of NaOCl increased the number of rhCC10 isoforms as well as the peak heights, indicating increased amounts of each isoform as the reaction progressed. At 20 oxidant equivalents, the HPLC shows that essentially all of the unmodified rhCC10 is gone and only modified isoforms remain. SDS-PAGE of these preparations under reducing conditions showed monomeric protein (6 kDa) as expected, but also showed dimer (˜12 kDa), tetramer (˜24 kDa), hexamer (˜32 kDa), and higher multimer bands remaining, as shown in FIG. 3. This is the first report of a tetramer formed by CC10 and stable to reducing SDS-PAGE conditions in the absence of transglutaminase activity. The presence and predominance of the monomer indicates that the amino acid sequence for rhCC10 is largely intact. Even at 100 oxidant equivalents, there are faint CC10 monomer, dimer, tetramer, and higher multimer bands on SDS-PAGE, although the majority of protein is missing and appears to be destroyed with that many oxidation equivalents.


Interactions of the modified and unmodified rhCC10 with the C-18 column reflect hydrophobic interactions between the protein and chromatography resin. The modified isoforms elute faster than the unmodified rhCC10, indicating that the amino acid residues on the surface of the modified protein are less hydrophobic than the unmodified protein. Changes in the surface hydrophobicity pattern likely correspond with changes in surface charge, which can be measured by the isoelectric point. Samples were analyzed by isoelectric focusing using pH 3-7 isoelectric focusing gels as shown in FIG. 4. There is a progressive shift in pI towards more acidic isoforms less than 4.5. There is also a band at pI˜5.5 in the reactions with 2 and 5 equivalents that disappears at 20 equivalents and may represent a reaction intermediate. Analysis of these reactions by Western blot of the IEF gel shows that all acidic NaOCl isoforms <4.5 are recognized by a rabbit polyclonal anti-rhCC10 antibody as shown in FIG. 5, however, the tetramer is not recognized by the polyclonal anti-rhCC10 antibody.


The extent of the chemical reaction and modification of rhCC10 can be estimated by the detection of reactive carbonyl groups. The presence of carbonyl groups in ROS-reacted rhCC10 samples can be detected by labeling the carbonyl groups with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), which adds a dinitrophenylhydrazone group (DNP), then analyzing the reaction products by Western blot using anti-DNP antibody as shown in FIG. 6. There is a baseline signal for monomer and tetramer in the unmodified CC10 (lane 8), which is exceeded in all other samples, regardless of type of ROS used in the reaction. Therefore, all ROS reactions produced some species that contained carbonyl groups. The unmodified dimer, and dimer in MPO and mCPBA modified preps show no reactivity and even blocked the background (see “ghost bands” at dimer position in lanes 2, 3, and 8.) There appears to be a combination effect of rhCC10 concentration and buffer in the NaOCl reaction. The signal strength in lane 4 is over 10× greater than lane 5, which is more than expected by the 2× difference in protein present. This suggests that higher rhCC10 concentration provides for a more extensive reaction than lower concentration when the reaction is done in water. The signal strength in lanes 4 and 7 is equal, despite that lane 7 contains half the protein, indicating that the reaction is more efficient in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 than in water. The signal strength in lane 6 is much less than in lane 7, despite that the same amount of protein is present. These observations indicate that the NaOCl reaction was more efficient when rhCC10 concentration is lower in the presence of buffer. Therefore, effect of rhCC10 concentration on reaction efficiency is opposite in water versus buffer. These differences illustrate how the process for chemical modification of rhCC10 with NaOCl is optimized. For example, an optimized process for NaOCl-mediated chemical modification of CC10 would involve the use of a lower concentration of rhCC10, in the presence of a low strength phosphate buffer at neutral pH.


Example 2: Chemical Modification of rhCC10 by ROS: mCPBA

Each reaction was initiated at ˜24° C. (room temperature) by adding meta-choloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) (6.21 □L, 2 mM in water, 12.42 nmol, 2 equivalents) in 1 portion to a solution of the protein (0.1 mg, 6.21 nmol) in water at 24° C. and incubating for 15 minutes in the dark with occasional stirring (total volume of 0.2 mL). The reaction was stopped by the addition of L-methionine (1.8 □L; 10 mM in water, 18.6 nmol) and incubated for 20 min at 24° C. Several reactions were performed using oxidant equivalents of mCPBA ranging from 2-100.


Oxidation of rhCC10 was monitored using HPLC. Reactions were concentrated in a Speedvac and then resuspended in water. Approximately 25 □g of each sample was injected onto the HPLC, as with the NaOCl reactions. New modified isoforms appeared as new HPLC peaks, eluting earlier than unmodified rhCC10, as shown in FIG. 7. Isoelectric focusing of the mCPBA reactions, shown in FIG. 8, revealed that multiple new isoforms were generated, including a cluster of new isoforms in the pI 4.5-5.2 range (4.6, 4.7, 4.9, 5.1, 5.2), two isoforms above 5.3 (˜5.5, ˜5.8) and one isoform below 4.5 (˜4.3). These additional 8 bands differed from the original unmodified rhCC10 with a major band at pI 4.8 and a minor band at ˜4.65. An important parameter in optimization of the reaction is temperature. The temperature of the reaction, 4° C. vs 21° C., did not affect the products or the apparent proportions of each product. Western blot of the IEF gel, shown in FIG. 9, demonstrated that the majority of these isoforms are recognized by a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against rhCC10. However, like the tetramer form generated by the NaOCl reaction, the band at pI 4.3 was not recognized by the anti-rhCC10 antibody, suggesting that the structure of the protein was dramatically changed when 10 eq mCPBA were used. The isoforms below the main immunoreactive band at 4.8, also showed less signal than would be expected based on the intensity of staining in the IEF gel. Further analysis of reaction conditions showed that the presence of CaCl2) could prevent modification of rhCC10 by mCPBA (FIG. 10, lane 2), that 100 eq mCPBA completely eliminates all of the original unmodified protein leaving only more acidic isoforms (pIs 4.0, 4.3, 4.5; lane 4), and that rhCC10 is destroyed if the reaction is run too long (lane 3).


In order to further characterize the CC10 isoforms generated in the mCPBA reaction, a protein sample of each of 8 separate major HPLC peaks (numbered 1-8) was collected, concentrated using a Speedvac, and verified by repeat HPLC to represent a single peak; for example peak 3, as shown in FIG. 11. The samples were then analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) to obtain molecular weights for each isoform. Table 2 shows the results of the MS analysis of isoforms contained in individual HPLC peaks. All CC10 isoforms had a greater molecular weight (MW) than the unmodified form, which has a MW of 16,110 daltons (Da). The addition of an oxygen adds 16 Da. The mCPBA reaction oxidized methionine residues before modifying other amino acids. This is clear since the average mass of 5 of the 8 peaks was increased by a multiple of 16 (eg. peaks 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8). Peak 3 did not increase by an even multiple of 16; this peak contains dimers in which the average number of oxygens is 5.25 or may represent more complex modification than simple addition of oxygen. Peaks 1 and 7 did not yield usable mass spectra.









TABLE 2







Mass spectral analysis of isolated mCPBA CC10 isoforms















# of




Mass
Mass change
Oxygens



Peak #
(daltons)
(daltons)
added
















1
Not obtained





2
16206.5
+~96
6



3
16194  
+~84
5.25



4
16190.7
+~80
5



5
16174.1
+~64
4



6
16173.5
+~64
4



7
Not obtained



8
16125.1
+~16
1










Example 3: Chemical Modification of rhCC10 by ROS: Myeloperoxidase Enzyme (MPO) and Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)

Modification of rhCC10 by MPO plus H2O2 was monitored using HPLC. The reaction of rhCC10 with MPO-H2O2 required extensive optimization before any CC10 modifications were observed. Initial reactions performed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, in the absence of calcium chloride (CaCl2)) were unsuccessful. Very modest increases in the number and height of new HPLC peaks were achieved in phosphate buffer at neutral pH with increasing amounts of MPO and H2O2. However, the lowering of pH to 5 using citrate buffer and the addition of CaCl2) dramatically increased the CC10 reaction products detectable as new HPLC peaks as shown in FIG. 12. Once calcium was added and pH was optimized, the amounts of MPO and H2O2 oxidant equivalents were re-optimized and a reproducible HPLC peak pattern showing a clear MPO- and H2O2-concentration and time dependent peak progression was observed. Briefly, a solution of the protein (0.1 mg, 6.21 nmol) in 2 mM CaCl2) and 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 5) was incubated at 37° C. for 30 min. The reaction was initiated at 37° C. by adding MPO (2.5 □L, 10 □g/mL in water, 25 ng) and H2O2 (1.55 □L, 100 mM in water, 155.25 nmol, 25 equivalents) and incubated in the dark for 30 min at 37° C. with occasional stirring. Another aliquot of MPO (25 ng) and H2O2 (1.55 □L) solutions were added and incubated for further 30 min at that temperature with stirring (total volume of 0.2 mL). The reaction was stopped by the addition of L-methionine (4.66 □L; 0.1 M in water, 0.466 □mol) and incubated for 30 min at 37° C. Reactions were typically concentrated in a Speedvac, then resuspended in water, and about 25 □g of each sample was injected onto the HPLC, as with the NaOCl and mCPBA reactions. Modified isoforms appeared as new HPLC peaks, eluting earlier than unmodified rhCC10, as shown in FIG. 13.


Isoelectric focusing of the MPO and H2O2 reactions, shown in FIG. 14, revealed that only 2 isoforms with altered isoelectric points were generated, including an isoform at 5.5 and one or more isoforms below 4.7. Unmodified CC10 sometimes appears as a major band at 4.8 plus a minor band at 4.7 in IEF gels (likely dimer and monomer, respectively). The gel was loaded with 25 mcg of each preparation, so that minor bands would not be missed. Therefore, the multiple peaks observed by HPLC (n=8) do not match the number of new bands on IEF (n>2). This indicates that, remarkably, at least 6 of the isoforms separated by HPLC on the basis of hydrophobic interactions retain the same surface charge as unmodified CC10. Western blot of an identical IEF gel, shown in FIG. 15, demonstrated that these pI 4.8 isoforms are recognized by a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against unmodified rhCC10.


In order to further characterize the CC10 isoforms generated in the MPO-H2O2 reactions, a protein sample of each of 8 major separable HPLC peaks (numbered 9-17) was collected, concentrated using a Speedvac, and verified by repeat HPLC to represent a single peak; for example peak 10, as shown in FIG. 16. The samples were then analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) to obtain molecular weights for each isoform. Table 3 shows the results of the MS analysis. All CC10 isoforms had a greater molecular weight (MW) than the unmodified form, which has a MW of 16,110 daltons (Da). In contrast to the mCPBA isoforms, none of the MPO-H2O2 isoforms showed molecular weight increases that were multiples of 16 (eg. simple additions of oxygen). Modifications under the conditions tested may include some combination of the addition of oxygen, chlorine, or other adducts, as well as the formation of carbonyl groups.









TABLE 3







Mass spectral analysis of isolated MPO-H2O2 CC10 isoforms















# of




Mass
Mass change
Oxygens



Peak #
(daltons)
(daltons)
added
















9
Not obtained





10
16234.7
124.7
7.79



11
16211.6
101.6
6.35



12
16218.9
108.9
6.81



13
16194.3
84.3
5.27



14
16191.7
81.7
5.11



15
16171.1
61.1
3.82



16
16188.1
78.1
4.88



17
16177  
67
4.19










Example 4: Chemical Modification of rhCC10 by RNS: Peroxynitrite

Modification of rhCC10 by peroxynitrite was monitored using HPLC. Each reaction was initiated at ˜23° C. (room temperature) by adding commercially available peroxynitrite reagent (10-100 equivalents) to 0.1 mg of protein (total reaction volume 0.2 mL), stirring briefly and incubating for 1h in the dark. Reactions were typically concentrated in a Speedvac, then resuspended in water, and about 25 □g of each sample was injected onto the HPLC, as with the other reactions. Modified isoforms appeared as new HPLC peaks, eluting both earlier and later than unmodified rhCC10, as shown in FIG. 17, panels A-B. Four new major peaks are evident using 10 equivalents, in addition to a peak that elutes at the same retention time as unmodified CC10. Use of over 20 equivalents resulted in loss of peaks, which broaden into a long bump centered at a point that elutes slightly sooner than unmodified CC10 (FIG. 17, panels D-E). This broad bump pattern indicates that a vast number of modifications and isoforms are generated. Given the loss of resolution of HPLC peaks, 10 equivalents was the maximum used in further experiments. Further optimization was performed at pH ranging from 3-6 (10 mM citrate buffer), with and without 2 mM CaCl2) as shown in FIG. 18, panels A-H. In contrast to MPO-H2O2 and mCPBA, where calcium and pH had a significant effect on the reactions, there was no apparent impact on the peroxynitrite reaction products.


Each human CC10 monomer contains a single tyrosine, which these results show is susceptible to nitration in the presence of RNS without the need to denature the protein with 8M urea, or elevate the reaction pH to 8.5-9.0, as previously observed using native rabbit uteroglobin and tetranitromethane instead of RNS (peroxynitrite) (Saavedra, 1980). As the reaction with peroxynitrite progresses, intermolecular bonds may form di-tyrosine complexes in different monomers. The isoforms generated by the peroxynitrite reactions were largely intact human CC10 homodimer with larger covalently linked complexes as shown by Western blot of SDS-PAGE in FIG. 19. Peroxynitrite reactions with human CC10 were run under non-reducing conditions in a 1-10% SDS-PAGE tricine gel, which was blotted to PVDF membrane, blocked with 4% non-fat milk, and probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibody. The blot shows immunoreactive human CC10 dimers, tetramers, and “smears” of higher molecular weight complexes, proving that the tyrosine residue in the human CC10 monomer and/or dimer is accessible from the surrounding environment and susceptible to modification without denaturation. Nitration of tyrosine does not disrupt dimer or tetramer stability. This pattern further indicates that tyrosine nitration favors the formation of large complexes, likely linked together by both di-tyrosines and disulfide bonds, but does not generate the distinct sets of thermodynamically favored multimers achieved by simple disulfide bond rearrangements in the absence of di-tyrosine formation.


The results herein (Examples 1-4) demonstrate that multiple reactive oxygen or nitrogen species may be used in the process to produce a ROS- or RNS-modified secretoglobin, such reactive oxygen or nitrogen species including but not limited to hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite, mCPBA, peroxynitrite, nitric oxide, hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, ozone, chlorine, fluorine, bromine, iodine, permanganate (MnO4), chromate (CrO4), dichromate (Cr2O7) ions, nitric acid (HNO3), perchloric acid (HClO4), and/or sulfuric acid (H2SO4). The results demonstrate that the concentration of sodium (Na) used in the process to produce a ROS- or RNS-modified secretoglobin is about 0.9% on a weight to volume basis, but may range between 0.1% and 20%. Potassium (K) alone or in combination with sodium, may also be used at a concentration of 0.1%-20%. The process may also utilize a buffer such as phosphate, citrate, sulfate, Tris, HEPES, or MOPS in order to maintain the pH at a constant level between pH 3.0 and 9.0, but most optimally in the 6.5-7.5 range. Calcium and/or magnesium may also be used in the process to manipulate the secretoglobin conformation to produce specific isoforms.


The results herein further demonstrate that the preferred temperature of the process for ROS and RNS modification of a secretoglobin is close to 0° C., in the range of 0−8° C., and that the most useful range of molar ratios of CC10 molecules to oxidant equivalents ranges between 1:1 and 1:50. However, as the temperature is increased, the molar ratio of oxidant equivalents may be decreased and one would expect that changes in secretoglobin conformation at below normal body temperature (<32° C.), body temperature and fever range (>32-45° C.), and over physiologic temperatures (>45° C.) would impact process efficiency and the isoforms produced.


Example 5: Modification of CC10 by Transglutaminase

CC10 was shown to be an in vitro substrate of tissue transglutaminase (aka TG2) (Manjunath, 1984), and is cross-linked to itself and other proteins via glutamine and lysine residues. Determination of availability of glutamine in uteroglobin as an acyl donor/amine acceptor was performed using biotin linked to two different monoamine groups. Purified guinea pig liver transglutaminase and monoamine-biotin reagents; 5-(Biotinamido)pentylamine and (+)-Biotinyl-3,6-dioxaoctanediamine; were purchased from a commercial vendor. The reactions were performed in 25 mM Tris/150 mM NaCl pH 8.0 with 1.5 mM DTT. Where applicable, CaCl2) was used at a final concentration of 4.5 mM. Calcium is a TG cofactor required for the crosslinking of glutamine and lysine residues. In the absence of calcium and reducing agent, TG2 mediates a rearrangement of disulfide bonds in CC10, resulting in formation of a “ladder” of multimers that can be reduced with a reducing agent (not shown). The protein and amine of interest were combined in buffer with or without calcium to an assay volume of 0.1 mL. Samples were pre-incubated at 37° C. for 30 minutes prior to the addition of the transglutaminase. EDTA at a final concentration of 50 mM was added to the samples without calcium and acted as negative controls. After the pre-incubation 5 □U of transglutaminase was added to each tube and the reaction was allowed to proceed at 37° C. for 60 minutes. After 60 minutes EDTA (50 mM) was added to the tubes containing calcium to stop the reaction. One hundred □L of SDS sample buffer plus reducing agent (1 mM DTT) was added to each reaction, which were then heated at 95° C. for 10 minutes prior to separation on a SDS-PAGE gel. The gel was blotted to a PVDF membrane. Blocking was done for 1 hour at room temperature using 5% BSA (filtered through a 2 micron membrane). Washes between incubations were done with PBS-Tween (0.4%). Biotin groups were detected on the labeled protein(s) by incubating with a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. Visualization was performed with colorimetric reagents (NBT/BCIP) as shown in FIG. 21. The results show that glutamines and lysines in CC10 are both acyl donors and acyl acceptors for TG2 reactions. The reaction is calcium dependent and is abolished by the removal of calcium with a chelating agent. The non-reducible high molecular weight bands indicate that CC10 contains at least two reactive glutamine—lysine pairs, since the high molecular weight bands represent cross-linked CC10 with at least one glutamine-amine biotin amine per complex (such that a single monomer is both labeled with the biotin tag and cross-linked to at least one other monomer). This also illustrates that moieties such as labels, chemicals, lipids, and peptides containing primary amine groups may be added to rhCC10 using TG2 in the presence of calcium and a reducing agent while other moieties containing sulfhydryl groups may be added to rhCC10 using TG in the absence of a reducing agent.


Example 6: Enhanced Inhibition of Influenza Replication In Vitro by Modified rhCC10 Compared to Unmodified rhCC10

In order to determine the effect of modification on the activity of rhCC10, a single pool of modified rhCC10 was made by combining equal aliquots of rhCC10 reactions with NaOCl, mCPBA, MPO+H2O2, and peroxynitrite. All HPLC peaks from each reaction were represented in the pool. Modified and unmodified rhCC10 preparations were diluted in eight half-log dilutions in MEM solution at the highest concentrations possible with the sample available. Each dilution was added to 5 wells of a 96-well plate with 80-100% confluent MDCK cells. Three wells of each dilution were infected with virus (H1H1 or H5N1), and two wells remained uninfected as toxicity controls. The multiplicity of infection (MOI) for each virus was between 0.1-1.0. Media was MEM solution with 10 units/mL trypsin. After untreated virus control wells reached maximum cytopathic effect (CPE), plates were then stained with neutral red dye for approximately 2 hours, then supernatant dye was removed from the wells and the incorporated dye was extracted in 50:50 Sorensen citrate buffer/ethanol, then the optical density at 540 nm was read on a spectrophotometer. Neutral red dye is taken up in live cells and used as a measure of cells remaining after viral infection. Results are shown in FIGS. 22A-BFIG. 22. Surprisingly, the modified rhCC10 preparation demonstrated enhanced anti-viral activity against two strains of influenza rather than a loss of function that is normally the consequence of oxidative protein modification.


Example 7: Enhanced Inhibition of Neutrophil Chemotaxis In Vitro by Modified rhCC10 Compared to Unmodified rhCC10

Human PLB-985 cells are an immature myeloid leukemia cell line that can be differentiated in vitro essentially into mature human neutrophils (Pedruzzi, 2002). The differentiated PLB-985 cells can then be used as surrogates for actual human neutrophils isolated from peripheral blood in neutrophil function assays such as chemotaxis in response to a variety of stimuli, including fMLP. fMLP is a formylated peptide (Met, Leu, Pro) that is produced only by bacteria and is a signal of bacterial overgrowth to the body that elicits a potent anti-inflammatory response, including migration of neutrophils along a concentration gradient towards the source of the fMLP. Both unmodified and modified rhCC10 were evaluated as inhibitors of differentiated PLB-985 (dPLB-985) in this model.


Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. To induce a differentiation to the mature neutrophil phenotype, PLB-985 cells were cultured in medium supplemented with 300 μM dibutyril cyclic AMP for 3 days before each experiment. Differentiated PLB-985 cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 (without phenol red) containing 10% FBS (RPMI/FBS) at 107 cells/ml. The cells were pre-incubated with 5 μg/ml calcein-acetoxymethyl ester at 37° C. for 30 min in the dark with constant agitation. The cells were then washed and resuspended in RPMI/FBS at 2×106 cells/ml. The dPLB-985 cells were incubated with 100 mcg/ml rhCC10 preparations at 37° C. for 60 min or PBS (50%). Cell migration was monitored using a 96-well ChemoTX disposable chemotaxis system (Neuro Probe). The wells of the lower chamber of the plate were filled with 32 μl of fMLP at 10−8 M. The polycarbonate filters (3 μM) were positioned on the plate, and dPLB-985 cells (30 μl; 60,000 cells/well) were placed on the filter and allowed to migrate for 120 min at 37° C. in the presence of 5% CO2 in the dark. The cells that had not migrated were removed by gently wiping the filters with a tissue.


The fluorescence of the cells in the filters was measured with a microplate fluorescence reader using excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 530 nm, respectively. The fluorescence from known numbers of dPLB-985 were obtained by placing them into the bottom chamber and a standard curve was generated (FIG. 23, B). FIG. 23C shows that unmodified rhCC10 (CC10-A) slightly inhibits neutrophil migration in response to fMLP, while NaOCl-modified rhCC10 (CC10-B) and mCPBA-modified rhCC10 (CC10-C) both inhibit neutrophil migration to a significantly greater extent. It was surprising to discover that these reactions enhanced rhCC10 activity rather than causing the more typical loss of function that is more often the result of oxidative modification.


Example 8: Modification of CC10 by Exposure to Metal

Recombinant human CC10 was produced using a ubiquitin-like (UBL) fusion protein expression system in E. coli bacteria, as described in Examples 2 and 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,765,127, except that the human CC10 sequence according to FIG. 24 A was produced instead of the human SCGB3A2 sequence. The version of rhCC10 produced using the UBL system will be referred to as “T2-CC10” and the original preparation of rhCC10 described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,344 is referred to as rhCC10. This UBL expression system has the advantage that extra N-terminal amino acids are not required for robust E. coli expression, and T2-CC10 lacks the two N-terminal alanine (AA) residues (FIG. 24 A). It uses a N-terminal histidine purification tag on an UBL fusion partner and with the hCC10 at the C-terminus of the UBL component. The purification scheme for T2-CC10 is shown in FIG. 24 B. The his tag enables the fusion protein to be purified from the crude lysate and other purification intermediates using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). IMAC uses a chromatographic resin (usually sepharose) that is loaded with metal ions such as nickel, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, chromium, and/or bismuth, or other metals. The CC10 component in the purification intermediate is juxtaposed to nickel metal ions during the purification step in which the his tagged UBL fusion protein binds to the IMAC resin. Metal ions and metal surfaces can function as oxidizing agents, similar to ROS, under certain conditions, such as those used during the IMAC purification step. All purification steps are typically carried out in ambient light at room temperature or between 2-8° C. and purification intermediates are typically stored at 2-8° C. between steps. However, variations in temperature may be used to manipulate the efficiency of different purification steps and/or the efficiency of CC10 modification. Therefore, T2-CC10 produced using this process is modified in a manner similar to that when purified rhCC10 made according to U.S. Pat. No. 9,765,127 is exposed to ROS and RNS in vitro.


One of the functional consequences of ROS modification of human CC10 is that binding of Syndecan-4 (SDC4) is enhanced as described in Examples 3, 8, and 9 of U.S. patent application 62/925,058. FIG. 24 C shows a Far-Western blot illustrating that unmodified rhCC10 binds poorly to immobilized SDC4, whereas ROS-modified and RNS-modified rhCC10 and T2-CC10 bind well to immobilized SDC4. The Far-Western blot method was done according to Example 3 of U.S. patent application 62/925,058. Briefly, 200 ng each of SDC1, SDC4, GPC3, rhCC10 (aka rhSCGB1A1) (positive control), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (negative control), all in PBS pH 7.4, were spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and allowed to dry. The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature. After blocking, the membranes were equilibrated in citrate buffer, pH 6.5, then the unmodified rhCC10, ROS-modified rhCC10, RNS-modified rhCC10, or T2-CC10 was diluted in citrate buffer, pH 6.5, to 50 mcg/ml, added to the blocked membrane, and incubated overnight at 4° C. with gentle agitation. The membrane was washed with PBS pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with gentle agitation in the primary anti-human CC10 antibody, which was diluted 1:1,000 in 0.1% non-fat dried milk in PBS-T. The membranes were washed with PBS-T and incubated in secondary antibody, which were each conjugated to alkaline phosphatase enzyme, diluted 1:8,000 in 0.1% non-fat dried milk in PBS-T, and incubated with the membranes for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were washed with PBS-T then incubated in NBT/BCIP to develop color.


The data illustrate that the ROS-modified rhCC10, RNS-modified rhCC10, and T2-CC10 are essentially equivalent in binding to SDC4, while the unmodified rhCC10 binding to SDC4 is significantly lower. Since the T2-CC10 was not ROS or RNS modified after it was purified and no other steps in the purification allow either the fusion protein or the T2-CC10 to come into contact with any type of oxidizing agent, we infer that the oxidative modification took place during the exposure of the UBL-T2-CC10 fusion protein to metal ions. This observation has significant implications not only in that it is possible to produce a version of recombinant human CC10 that has the enhanced potency properties of ROS-modified or RNS-modified rhCC10 without having to perform the extra step of exposing the purified protein to ROS or RNS, but also that exposure to metal ions and/or surfaces, such as injection needles or other metal delivery device components, could positively or negatively impact the biological activities of the purified recombinant human CC10 protein.

Claims
  • 1. A process to produce modified synthetic CC10 protein containing a modified amino acid comprising contacting a purified CC10 molecule or a purification intermediate with a metal ion or metal surface.
  • 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal ion is nickel, iron, cobalt, copper, manganese, chromium, and/or bismuth.
  • 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature during contact is maintained between 0° C. and 8° C.
  • 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature during contact is maintained between 8° C. and 32° C.
  • 5. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature during contact is maintained between 32° C. and 45° C.
  • 6. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature during contact is maintained above 45° C.
  • 7. The process of claim 1 wherein exposure of the purified CC10 molecule or a purification intermediate to light is limited.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/896,213 filed Jun. 9, 2020, now abandoned which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/416,268, filed Jul. 17, 2016, patented as U.S. Pat. No. 10,676,513 B2 on Jun. 9, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/212,277, filed on Jul. 17, 2016, patented as U.S. Pat. No. 10,294,285 B2 on May 21, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/843,773, filed Mar. 15, 2013, patented as U.S. Pat. No. 9,394,349 B2 on Jul. 19, 2016, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
6953666 Kinkade Oct 2005 B1
7655413 Butt Feb 2010 B2
7846899 Pilon Dec 2010 B2
8470767 Pilon Jun 2013 B2
8501688 Kimura Aug 2013 B2
9394349 Pilon Jul 2016 B2
1029428 Pilon-Clayton May 2019 A1
10676513 Pilon-Clayton Jun 2020 B2
20010029025 Dreyfuss Oct 2001 A1
20030008816 Pilon Jan 2003 A1
20040047857 Pilon Mar 2004 A1
20060275794 Carrino Dec 2006 A1
20080063626 Ding Mar 2008 A1
20090004684 Maier Jan 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0617965 Oct 1994 EP
2004101824 Nov 2004 WO
2007109118 Mar 2007 WO
2011047065 Apr 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (56)
Entry
Giannone et al. “Oxidative modification of recombinant human Clara Cell Secretory Protein (rhCC10) by myeloperoxidase (MPO) and HOCI in vitro.” Pediatric Research 53;416A, Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies, Seattle, WA USA. (Year: 2003).
Cai et al. “Preclinical evaluation of human secretoglobin 3A2 in mouse models of lung development and fibrosis” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 306:L10-L22. (Year: 2014).
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/030117 dated Sep. 29, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2014/030117 dated Mar. 2, 2015.
Levine, et al. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Intratracheal Recombinant Human Clara Cell Protein in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Pediatric Research (Jul. 2005) 58, 15-21.
Vilaseca M et al., “Stepwise and Convergent Approaches to the Synthesis of the Uteroglobin Monomer, a 70 Amino Acid Peptide”, Peptides 1996, Proceedings of the European Symposium, Sep. 18-13, 1996, p. 873-874.
Antico, G., M. W. Lingen, A. Sassano, J. Melby, R. W. Welch, S. Fiore, A. L. Pilon and L. Miele. “Recombinant human uteroglobin/CC10 inhibits the adhesion and migration of primary human endothelial cells via specific and saturable binding to fibronectin.” J Cell Physiol 207(2): 553-561 (Dec. 2005).
Arias-Martinez, J., M. Palacios-Sanchez, D. Delgado-Franco, J. Guzman-Barcenas, E. Garcia-Latorre, L. Zhang and C. Irles. “Clara cell protein expression in human neonates during respiratory distress syndrome.” Cell Physiol Biochem 29(5-6): 753-760 (Mar. 2012).
Barnes, H. J., L. Nordlund-Moller, M. Nord, J. Gustafsson, J. Lund and M. Gillner. “Structural basis for calcium binding by uteroglobins.” J Mol Biol 256(2): 392-404 (Nov. 1995).
Berlett, B. S. and E. R. Stadtman. “Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress.” J Biol Chem 272(33): 20313-20316 (Aug. 1997).
Cai, Z. and L. J. Yan. “Protein Oxidative Modifications: Beneficial Roles in Disease and Health.” J Biochem Pharmacol Res 1(1): 15-26 (Mar. 2013).
Callebaut, I., A. Poupon, R. Bally, J. P. Demaret, D. Housset, J. Delettre, P. Hossenlopp and J. P. Mornon. “The uteroglobin fold.” Ann N Y Acad Sci 923: 90-112 (Jan. 2000).
Chalker, J. M., L. Lercher, N. R. Rose, C. J. Schofield and B. G. Davis. “Conversion of cysteine into dehydroalanine enables access to synthetic histones bearing diverse post-translational modifications.” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51(8): 1835-1839 (Sep. 2011).
Davies, K. J., M. E. Delsignore and S. W. Lin. “Protein damage and degradation by oxygen radicals. II. Modification of amino acids.” J Biol Chem 262(20): 9902-9907 (Jul. 1987).
Folk, J. E. “Mechanism of action of guinea pig liver transglutaminase. VI. Order of substrate addition.” J Biol Chem 244(13): 3707-3713 (Aug. 1967).
Guptasarma, P., D. Balasubramanian, S. Matsugo and I. Saito. “Hydroxyl radical mediated damage to proteins, with special reference to the crystallins.” Biochemistry 31(17): 4296-4303 (Jul. 1991).
Hard, T., H. J. Barnes, C. Larsson, J. A. Gustafsson and J. Lund. “Solution structure of a mammalian PCB-binding protein in complex with a PCB.” Nat Struct Biol 2(11): 983-989 (Nov. 1995).
Hawkins, C. L., D. I. Pattison and M. J. Davies. “Hypochlorite-induced oxidation of amino acids, peptides and proteins.” Amino Acids 25(3-4): 259-274 (Jan. 2003).
Hazen, S. L., F. F. Hsu and J. W. Heinecke. “p-Hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde is the major product of L-tyrosine oxidation by activated human phagocytes. A chloride-dependent mechanism for the conversion of free amino acids into reactive aldehydes by myeloperoxidase.” J Biol Chem 271(4): 1861-1867 (Sep. 1995).
Henderson, J. P., J. Byun, M. V. Williams, D. M. Mueller, M. L. McCormick and J. W. Heinecke. “Production of brominating intermediates by myeloperoxidase. A transhalogenation pathway for generating mutagenic nucleobases during inflammation.” J Biol Chem 276(11): 7867-7875 (Nov. 2000).
Jeon, J. H. and I. G. Kim. “Role of protein modifications mediated by transglutaminase 2 in human viral diseases.” Front Biosci 11: 221-231 (Jan. 2006).
Klug, J., H. M. Beier, A. Bernard, B. S. Chilton, T. P. Fleming, R. I. Lehrer, L. Miele, N. Pattabiraman and G. Singh. “Uteroglobin/Clara cell 10-kDa family of proteins: nomenclature committee report.” Ann N Y Acad Sci 923: 348-354 (2000).
Lesort, M., J. Tucholski, M. L. Miller and G. V. Johnson. “Tissue transglutaminase: a possible role in neurodegenerative diseases.” Prog Neurobiol 61(5): 439-463 (Aug. 1999).
Lindahl, M., K. Irander, C. Tagesson and B. Stahlbom. “Nasal lavage fluid and proteomics as means to identify the effects of the irritating epoxy chemical dimethylbenzylamine.” Biomarkers 9(1): 56-70 (Sep. 2003).
Lindahl, M., J. Svartz and C. Tagesson. “Demonstration of different forms of the anti-inflammatory proteins lipocortin-1 and Clara cell protein-16 in human nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids.” Electrophoresis 20(4-5): 881-890 (Sep. 1998).
Lorand, L. and R. M. Graham. “Transglutaminases: crosslinking enzymes with pleiotropic functions.” Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4(2): 140-156 (Feb. 2003).
Madian, A. G. and F. E. Regnier. “Proteomic identification of carbonylated proteins and their oxidation sites.” J Proteome Res 9(8): 3766-3780 (Aug. 2010).
Mantile, G., L. Miele, E. Cordella-Miele, G. Singh, S. L. Katyal and A. B. Mukherjee. “Human Clara cell 10-kDa protein is the counterpart of rabbit uteroglobin.” J Biol Chem 268(27): 20343-20351 (Apr. 1993).
Mukherjee, A. B., E. Cordella-Miele, T. Kikukawa and L. Miele. “Modulation of cellular response to antigens by uteroglobin and transglutaminase.” Adv Exp Med Biol 231: 135-152 (Jan. 1988).
Mukherjee, A. B., G. C. Kundu, G. Mantile-Selvaggi, C. J. Yuan, A. K. Mandal, S. Chattopadhyay, F. Zheng, N. Pattabiraman and Z. Zhang. “Uteroglobin: a novel cytokine?” Cell Mol Life Sci 55(5): 771-787 (Dec. 1998).
Mukherjee, A. B., Z. Zhang and B. S. Chilton. “Uteroglobin: a steroid-inducible immunomodulatory protein that founded the Secretoglobin superfamily.” Endocr Rev 28(7): 707-725 (Oct. 2007).
Nagy, P., A. J. Kettle and C. C. Winterbourn. “Superoxide-mediated formation of tyrosine hydroperoxides and methionine sulfoxide in peptides through radical addition and intramolecular oxygen transfer.” J Biol Chem 284(22): 14723-14733 (May 2009).
Nemes, Z., L. N. Marekov, L. Fesus and P. M. Steinert. “A novel function for transglutaminase 1: attachment of long-chain omega-hydroxyceramides to involucrin by ester bond formation.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(15): 8402-8407 (Jul. 1999).
Nicolas, E., C. Ferrer, L. Taboada and E. Giralt. “Coupe du roi bisection of proteins. Spontaneous tetramerization of two peptides that span the sequence of the rabbit uteroglobin monomer.” J Am Chem Soc 127(50): 17719-17733 (Jun. 2005).
Ottaviano, F. G., D. E. Handy and J. Loscalzo. “Redox regulation in the extracellular environment.” Circ J 72(1): 1-16 (Oct. 2007).
Pedruzzi, E., M. Fay, C. Elbim, M. Gaudry and M. A. Gougerot-Pocidalo. “Differentiation of PLB-985 myeloid cells into mature neutrophils, shown by degranulation of terminally differentiated compartments in response to N-formyl peptide and priming of superoxide anion production by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.” Br J Haematol 117(3): 719-726 (Dec. 2001).
Peter, W., R. Dunkel, P. F. Stouten, G. Vriend, M. Beato and G. Suske. “Interchain cysteine bridges control entry of progesterone to the central cavity of the uteroglobin dimer.” Protein Eng 5(4): 351-359 (Jan. 1992).
Ramsay, P. L., F. J. DeMayo, S. E. Hegemier, M. E. Wearden, C. V. Smith and S. E. Welty. “Clara cell secretory protein oxidation and expression in premature infants who develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164(1): 155-161 (Aug. 2000).
Shacter, E. “Quantification and significance of protein oxidation in biological samples.” Drug Metab Rev 32(3-4): 307-326 (Jan. 2000).
Shao, B., A. Belaaouaj, C. L. Verlinde, X. Fu and J. W. Heinecke. “Methionine sulfoxide and proteolytic cleavage contribute to the inactivation of cathepsin G by hypochlorous acid: an oxidative mechanism for regulation of serine proteinases by myeloperoxidase.” J Biol Chem 280(32): 29311-29321 (Apr. 2005).
Stadtman, E. R. and B. S. Berlett. “Fenton chemistry. Amino acid oxidation.” J Biol Chem 266(26): 17201-17211 (Mar. 1991).
Stadtman, E. R., J. Moskovitz, B. S. Berlett and R. L. Levine. “Cyclic oxidation and reduction of protein methionine residues is an important antioxidant mechanism.” Mol Cell Biochem 234-235(1-2): 3-9 (Jan. 2002).
Thomas, E. L., M. B. Grisham and M. M. Jefferson. “Preparation and characterization of chloramines.” Methods Enzymol 132: 569-585 (Jan. 1986).
Tien, M., B. S. Berlett, R. L. Levine, P. B. Chock and E. R. Stadtman. “Peroxynitrite-mediated modification of proteins at physiological carbon dioxide concentration: pH dependence of carbonyl formation, tyrosine nitration, and methionine oxidation.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(14): 7809-7814 (May 1999).
Umland, T. C., S. Swaminathan, W. Furey, G. Singh, J. Pletcher and M. Sax. “Refined structure of rat Clara cell 17 kDa protein at 3.0 A resolution.” J Mol Biol 224(2): 441-448 (Nov. 1991).
Umland, T. C., S. Swaminathan, G. Singh, V. Warty, W. Furey, J. Pletcher and M. Sax. “Structure of a human Clara cell phospholipid-binding protein-ligand complex at 1.9 A resolution.” Nat Struct Biol 1(8): 538-545 (Aug. 1994).
Van Dalen, C. J., C. C. Winterbourn, R. Senthilmohan and A. J. Kettle. “Nitrite as a substrate and inhibitor of myeloperoxidase. Implications for nitration and hypochlorous acid production at sites of inflammation.” J Biol Chem 275(16): 11638-11644 (Dec. 1999).
Winterbourn, C. C., M. B. Hampton, J. H. Livesey and A. J. Kettle. “Modeling the reactions of superoxide and myeloperoxidase in the neutrophil phagosome: implications for microbial killing.” J Biol Chem 281(52): 39860-39869 (Jun. 2006).
Yan, L. J. and M. J. Forster. “Chemical probes for analysis of carbonylated proteins: a review.” J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 879(17-18): 1308-1315 (Jan. 2011).
Yan, L. J., W. C. Orr and R. S. Sohal. “Identification of oxidized proteins based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunochemical detection, isoelectric focusing, and microsequencing.” Anal Biochem 263(1): 67-71 (Jan. 1998).
Yang, C., J. Wang, A. N. Krutchinsky, B. T. Chait, J. D. Morrisett and C. V. Smith. “Selective oxidation in vitro by myeloperoxidase of the N-terminal amine in apolipoprotein B-100.” J Lipid Res 42(11): 1891-1896 (Jan. 2001).
Yang, C. Y., Z. W. Gu, M. Yang, S. N. Lin, A. J. Garcia-Prats, L. K. Rogers, S. E. Welty and C. V. Smith. “Selective modification of apoB-100 in the oxidation of low density lipoproteins by myeloperoxidase in vitro.” J Lipid Res 40(4): 686-698 (Feb. 1998).
Giannone, “Oxidative modification of recombinant human Clara Cell Secretory Protein (rhCC10) by myeloperoxidase (MPO) and HOCI in vitro.” Pediatric Research 53(4 part 2):416A Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies in Seattle, WA USA (May 3-6, 2003).
Saavedra, “Influence of chemical modification of amino acid side chains on the binding of progesterone to uteroglobin.” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 13(11):1347-1353 Nov. 1, 1980.
Porta, “Transglutaminase-catalyzed modifications of SV-IV, a major protein secreted from the rat seminal vesicle epithelium.” International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research 35(2):117-122 Feb. 1, 1990.
Broeckaert, “Clara Cell secretory protein (cc16): Characteristics and perspectives as lung peripheral biomarker.”, Clinical and Experimental Allergy: Journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology 30(4):469-475 (Apr. 1, 2000).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210363203 A1 Nov 2021 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16416268 May 2019 US
Child 16896213 US
Parent 15212277 Jul 2016 US
Child 16416268 US
Parent 13843773 Mar 2013 US
Child 15212277 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16896213 Jun 2020 US
Child 17222531 US