The present disclosure is directed in general to energy supplies for underwater, unmanned vehicles (UUVs), and, more particularly, to energy derivation for powering UUVs using in situ ocean resources.
Various proposals for energy supplies within Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUV) have proven impractical or only provide power in amounts limited to less than about 200 watts (W) at 2.2 Watt-hour (WHr) capacity. Fuel cells require large packages and substantial space for battery storage together with the demands of hydrogen logistics. Power tethers from central power plants limit vehicle range and deployment.
A carbon dioxide cycle power generation system includes first and second carbon dioxide storage each configured to store a portion of carbon dioxide and including a carbon dioxide transfer connection, and a carbon dioxide transfer path between the two transfer connections configured to selectively direct a flow of at least part of the carbon dioxide through a rotor vane turbine serving as a fluid orifice. The carbon dioxide cycle power generation system cycles between different seawater depths, employing one or both of seawater pressure and seawater temperature in creating the flow of liquid or vapor carbon dioxide through the rotor vane turbine acting as a fluid orifice. In one implementation, the first and second carbon dioxide storage each comprise a variable volume hydraulic cylinder with a movable piston and an inlet/outlet control valve positioned below the movable piston, the inlet/outlet control valve selectively allowing seawater into or out of a lower portion of the respective variable volume tank below the movable piston to pressurize a respective one of the first or second portions of carbon dioxide relative to the other when the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system is at a first depth. In another implementation, the first portion of the carbon dioxide is contained within an annular region surrounding a central region with uninhibited heat transfer between the respective first portion of the carbon dioxide and the seawater, while the second carbon dioxide storage comprises an insulated, water jacketed tank inhibiting heat transfer between the respective second portion of the carbon dioxide and the seawater. One or both of the first and second portions of the carbon dioxide may comprise both carbon dioxide liquid and carbon dioxide gas. An unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) including the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system is operated on electrical power generated by the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system and stored in one or more batteries within the UUV. A two carrier chirp communications system is coupled to the carbon dioxide transfer path and employs a pulse wave of at least part of the carbon dioxide liquid or vapor flow through the turbine as a first carrier and to generate a chirp signal on a second carrier that is one of combined and interleaved with the first carrier to generate an output pressure pulse communications signal. The two carrier chirp communications system comprises a pressure pulse resonator coupled to the flow of the at least part of the carbon dioxide liquid or vapor through the turbine, an annular array of frequency resonators adjacent the pressure pulse resonator, and a Helmholtz resonator external to the annular array of frequency resonators. The UUV employs the two carrier chirp communications system to transmit data to remote receivers, and/or may be tethered and configured to cycle between depths according to a selected one of a plurality of different depth cycles.
Although specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include some, none, or all of the enumerated advantages. Additionally, other technical advantages may become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its advantages, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts:
It should be understood at the outset that, although exemplary embodiments are illustrated in the figures and described below, the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not. The present disclosure should in no way be limited to the exemplary implementations and techniques illustrated in the drawings and described below. Additionally, unless otherwise specifically noted, articles depicted in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The present disclosure presents an innovative approach to providing power to a UUV, while providing long range underwater communications capability through its turbine power converter. The approach of the present disclosure provides power for extended endurance underwater missions, providing up to or exceeding 500 Watts (W) of power for a 33 minute power cycle using about 20 pounds (lb) of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is employed at six times the density of air through a typical air motor providing density and temperature benefits. The power generation system disclosed also provides in situ power for communications, and requires only carriage of carbon dioxide, at lower pressures than required for the agents employed in fuel cells. In addition, significantly less pressure is required from the vessels than for fuel cells: on the order of about 1200 pounds per square inch (psi) versus at least 8,000 psi or more.
Power conversion in accordance with the present disclosure is versatile, with each of three approaches all suitable for the carbon dioxide power generation cycle employed: a vane rotor; an impulse turbine with fluid orifice; and an axial flow turbine with a choked flow (via an orifice) input in all cases and optionally multiple stages. The prime power cycle of the present disclosure can drive a generator and charge batteries using ocean thermals and compression (compressive work) in the trans-critical carbon dioxide gas/liquid pressure-volume cycle. One version of carbon dioxide power generation cycle employed is a combined Rankine cycle and Otto cycle. The carbon dioxide cycle power generation system described is sustainable, and may operation for an estimated two years without maintenance or repair, limited primarily by the battery and comparable to most refrigeration systems.
The power produced for operation of remote UUVs yields a surplus of energy, and allows optional use of direct power (before storage losses) power drive for an acoustic resonator providing the communications carrier for UUV communications. An acoustic actuator may be operated via a high density (carbon dioxide) fluid and hydraulics. A dual carrier acoustic communications scheme may be employed in which pressure pulses are created on an acoustic oscillator. The necessary communications infrastructure requires only a two carrier system: a main carrier continuous wave (CW) that is driven by the carbon dioxide cycle and a piezo-driven digital chirp. Due to periodic dives through 600 meters (m), the communications system can operate in range of acoustic depth and channels.
At least the hydraulic cylinders 101 and 102 and the control valves 104, 105, 107 and 108 may each employ commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) components. Hydraulic cylinders 101 and 102 are preferably rated to 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi), although the required maximum pressure will typically only be about 1,500 psi. Although the principles of the present disclosure are illustrated with reference to two hydraulic cylinders, embodiments may employ, for example, two separate hydraulic cylinders operating coordinately in place of one of the two hydraulic cylinders 101 or 102 depicted in
The illustrated operating cycle of the carbon dioxide cycle power generation 110 begins at an underwater depth corresponding to an external pressure or 10-20 bar, where the seawater temperature is typically 5-8 degrees Celsius (° C.). The inlet/outlet control valve 107 of hydraulic cylinder 101 is opened as shown in
While still at depth, the transfer control valves 104 and 105 are closed as illustrated in
The UUV containing the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 100 then dives to the previous depth (corresponding to 10-20 bar pressure). At that depth, the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 100 opens the inlet/outlet control valve 108 for hydraulic cylinder 102 as shown in
While still at depth, the transfer control valves 104 and 105 are again closed as illustrated in
The modified carbon dioxide gas power cycle is a closed system which is analogous to the steam cycle described above. In the modified carbon dioxide gas power cycle, the initial state 201 generally corresponding to the initial state described above for the steam cycle occurs when the UUV is at or near the surface, with most of the carbon dioxide gas within hydraulic cylinder 101. The relatively warm seawater near the surface transfers heat to the carbon dioxide gas within the hydraulic cylinders 101 and 102. When the transfer control valves 104 and 105 are opened and carbon diode gas transfers from hydraulic cylinder 101 through the turbine and chirp generator 106 to hydraulic cylinder 102, the state changes to a second state 202 of reduced pressure and increased volume. Thereafter, when UUV descends and is at depth (that is, not near the surface, but instead near the lowest depth for the carbon dioxide power generation cycle described), the opening of the inlet/outlet control valve 108 for hydraulic cylinder 102 increases pressure (due to the water pressure of the seawater at depth) to state 203. When the transfer control valves 104 and 105 are opened and carbon diode gas transfers from hydraulic cylinder 102 through the turbine and chirp generator 106 to hydraulic cylinder 101, state 204 is attained, with the lowest pressure and largest volume, and at which heat transfers out from the carbon dioxide gas to the surrounding, relatively cold seawater. At depth, the seawater pressure when inlet/outlet control valve 107 on hydraulic cylinder 101 is opened causes a transition to state 205, at a slight higher pressure and much lower volume. When the UUV returns to surface depth, the state transitions back to state 201.
One consideration during operation of the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 300 is the percent-rated fill factor for a non-ideal (i.e., carbon dioxide) gas, illustrated in
Following
In the disposition 510 of
In the disposition 520 of
In the disposition 530 of
Once the center tank 303 is depleted, the batteries within the UUV should be fully charged, and communications have been made. The UUV then ascends to the surface by blowing some of the cold ballast, and perform a reconnoiter and/or an inductive power transfer to the UUV. A baseline implementation of the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 300 contains of 100 kg of carbon dioxide and exploits a total delta head (Q) from ocean thermals, a content of 10-70 kilo Joules (kJ) of energy from typical mid to low-latitudes, per charge cycle. So configured, the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 300 will produce charging of 1.5 kW over 1.75 hours or 3 kW of charging over 0.875 hours. The battery capacity required to store the power generated is 5 kWHr—for example, 10 volts (V) at 30 amps (A) for 0.875 hours—assuming 85% generator efficiency and 75% turbine efficiency. This baseline is approximately 25 gallons of carbon dioxide, which at 100% fill factor would require a 1.5 foot diameter by 11 foot tank, leaving 34% by volume filled with liquid carbon dioxide. Each of the annular tanks 301, 302 is individually sized slightly smaller than the main tank 303, as shown in
The carbon dioxide cycle power generation system 300 is versatile as to the conversion systems that may be employed. An axial flow air turbine having multiple, very small stages and operating at higher speeds may be employed with a generator that directly drives high voltage windings, while also driving a piezo actuator. The piezo actuator may operate directly or through stored energy. An impulse turbine alternative requires larger diameter and operates at slower speeds, but is easier to manufacture, may be sealed, may be multi-stage (and is simpler to implement in multiple stages), can operate from choked flow carbon dioxide gas injectors, and operates better with high pressures. The vane rotor option described above is an established technology for 100 psi but not yet developed for 1000 psi, is sealable, may be implemented with COTS components, acts as a choked flow, is more suitable for lower pressures or miniaturization (although a larger radius may be developed), and may tap pressure pulses to drive oscillator. With a vane rotor embodiment, a Helmholtz resonator with valve springs may be driven by the carbon dioxide gas or a hydraulic line.
Simpler implementations of a fixed volume carbon dioxide cycle power generation system do not even require use of internal valves, but instead rely on varying temperatures to send the carbon dioxide back and forth between the tanks using an orifice or precision gas needle valve. The water jackets illustrated in
Although
Because the carbon dioxide cycle generates power levels of up to 5 kW, sufficient power remains (up to 1 kW) after powering the UUV to drive the second carrier. The communication system is also suitable for pulse chirps in sonar mode. With the communications system described, the UUV will be capable of secure communications to 500 nmi, using the efficient carbon dioxide cycle as power source and capable of use with a wide band resonator for wideband jamming or charge noise self-cancelling.
The ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) approach of the present disclosure enables long life undersea power generation from a closed carbon dioxide temperature-pressure system, enabling long endurance missions, enabling any one or more of extended UUV glider missions, establishment of a 1000 nmi or greater surveillance fence, beyond line of sight (BLOS) underwater communication, and tactically deployable pseudolite sound sources for underseas positioning system signaling. The design innovations of the present disclosure include: choked-flow control of pressure equalization, enabling optimal turbine operation; pumpless discharge conserving energy; a compact rotary vane turbine that is reliable and easy to manufacture; and a topping cycle for higher efficiency. As a power system, the carbon dioxide-based OTEC power harvesting of the present disclosure delivers total energy (kWHr) far exceeding other long endurance schemes, and in a smaller package. The Rankine cycle carbon dioxide approach allows flexible selection among electrical power generation systems. Low power flooding with an efficient topping cycle using variable volumes is used within the carbon dioxide cycle power generation system of the present disclosure.
The communications system of the present disclosure is a harmonic oscillator in which a carbon dioxide cycle-driven acoustic actuator operates as part of the carbon dioxide power cycle. A vane rotor and Helmholtz resonator tuned to a frequency band 500-2500 Hz uses two carriers for acoustic communications, creating pressure pulses on an acoustic oscillator in place of a high voltage piezo ceramic driver. Direct conversion of ocean thermals and compression are exploited for communications, with a multi-path signal using two carriers (CW and chirp) combined or interleaved for a range of 540 nmi at 500 Hz and 250 nmi at 750 Hz. The communications signaling is suitable for passive time-reversal receiving methods, operating efficiently (e.g., when directly driven rather than via stored energy) and with versatility (may either be directly driven or use stored energy).
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For example, the components of the systems and apparatuses may be integrated or separated. Moreover, the operations of the systems and apparatuses disclosed herein may be performed by more, fewer, or other components and the methods described may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order. As used in this document, “each” refers to each member of a set or each member of a subset of a set.
The description in the present application should not be read as implying that any particular element, step, or function is an essential or critical element which must be included in the claim scope: the scope of patented subject matter is defined only by the allowed claims. Moreover, none of these claims are intended to invoke 35 USC § 112(f) with respect to any of the appended claims or claim elements unless the exact words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim, followed by a participle phrase identifying a function. Use of terms such as (but not limited to) “mechanism,” “module,” “device,” “unit,” “component,” “element,” “member,” “apparatus,” “machine,” “system,” “processor,” or “controller” within a claim is understood and intended to refer to structures known to those skilled in the relevant art, as further modified or enhanced by the features of the claims themselves, and is not intended to invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112(f).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
952452 | Leon | Mar 1910 | A |
1108192 | LaGergren | Aug 1914 | A |
1315267 | White | Sep 1919 | A |
1361561 | Yancey | Dec 1920 | A |
1421369 | Ardo | Jul 1922 | A |
1710670 | Bonney | Apr 1929 | A |
2000746 | Dray | May 1935 | A |
2381478 | Zukor | Sep 1942 | A |
2537929 | Daly et al. | Jan 1951 | A |
2642693 | Broady | Jun 1953 | A |
2720367 | Doolittle | Oct 1955 | A |
2750794 | Downs | Jun 1956 | A |
2783955 | Fitz Patrick | Mar 1957 | A |
2823636 | Gongwer | Feb 1958 | A |
2826001 | Presnell | Mar 1958 | A |
2845221 | Vine et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
2911792 | Rinia | Nov 1959 | A |
2964874 | Armando | Dec 1960 | A |
3157145 | Farris et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3376588 | Berteaux et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3698345 | Kreitner | Oct 1972 | A |
3815555 | Tubeuf | Jun 1974 | A |
3818523 | Stillman | Jun 1974 | A |
3901033 | McAlister | Aug 1975 | A |
3918263 | Swingle | Nov 1975 | A |
4403154 | Reale et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4445818 | Ohsaki et al. | May 1984 | A |
4529120 | Fleshman, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4577583 | Green, II | Mar 1986 | A |
4850551 | Krawetz et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4919637 | Fleischmann | Apr 1990 | A |
5134955 | Manfield | Aug 1992 | A |
5291847 | Webb | Mar 1994 | A |
5303552 | Webb | Apr 1994 | A |
5579640 | Gray, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5615632 | Nedderman, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
6142092 | Coupland | Nov 2000 | A |
6263819 | Gorustein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328622 | Geery | Dec 2001 | B1 |
8046990 | Bollinger et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069808 | Imlach et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8117842 | McBride et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8205570 | Tureaud et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
20060059912 | Romanelli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070186553 | Lin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080088171 | Cheng | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090178603 | Imlach et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090277400 | Conry | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100192575 | Ai-Mayahi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100327605 | Andrews | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051880 | Ai-Mayahi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101579 | Polakowski et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110167825 | Mauran et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120091942 | Jones et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120289103 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130068973 | van Ruth | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130180243 | Hurtado | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20180119990 | Alsadah | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
215277 | Dec 1906 | DE |
2660433 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2698506 | Feb 2014 | EP |
235363 | Jun 1925 | GB |
541775 | Dec 1941 | GB |
658070 | Oct 1951 | GB |
2422877 | Aug 2006 | GB |
2011000062 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/017499 dated May 29, 2017, 13 pages. |
Mosca, et al.; “Low-Frequency Acoustic Source for AUV Long-Range Communication”; iXSea, France; JAMSTEC, Japan; no date; prior to filing date; 9 pp. |
Jack A. Jones et al., “Novel Thermal Powered Technology for UUV Persistant Surveillance”, California Institute of Technology, Feb. 10, 2006, 11 pgs. |
Terry Huntsberger et al., “Slocum-TREC Thermal Glider”, California Institute of Technology, Jan. 31, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Terry Huntsberger et al., “Advanced Energy Storage System for Thermal Engines”, California Institute of Technology, Jan. 31, 2013, 16 pgs. |
Yi Chao, “Diurnal Variability Part I: Global 1-km SST (G1SST) Part II:GHRSST-DV-Argo Obs. System”, California Institute of Technology, Feb. 28, 2011, 19 pgs. |
NASA,“Utilizing Ocean Thermal Energy in a Submarine Robot”, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA Tech Briefs NPO-43304, Dec. 18, 2008, 4 pgs. |
T. Shimura et al., “Long-Range Rime Reversal Communication in Deep Water: Experimental Results”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132 (1), Jul. 2012, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4730038], Jun. 19, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Gregory W. Heinen, “Modified CO2 Cycle for Long Endurance Unmanned Underwater Vehicles and Resultant Chirp Acoustic Capability”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/091,415, filed Apr. 5, 2016. |
Gregory W. Heinen et al., “Apparatus and Method for Periodically Charging Ocean Vessel or Other System Using Thermal Energy Conversion”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/173,178, filed Jun. 3, 2016. |
Gregory W. Heinen, “Hydraulic Drives for Use in Charging Systems, Ballast Systems, or Other Systems of Underwater Vehicles,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/173,214, filed Jun. 3, 2016. |
Gregory W. Heinen, et al., “Systems and Methods Supporting Periodic Exchange of Power Supplies in Uderwater Vehicles or Other Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/264,399, filed Sep. 13, 2016. |
Bowman, M.F., “A Passive Capture Latch for Odyssey-Class AUVs,” Technical Report WHOI-98-12, Jun. 12, 1998, 91 pages, publisher Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA. |
Singh, Hanumant, et al., “Docketing for an Autonomous Ocean Sampling Network,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Oct. 2001, pp. 498-514, vol. 26, No. 4, publisher IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Bowen, Andrew D., et al., “The Nereus Hybrid Underwater Robotic Vehicle for Global Ocean Science Operations to 11,000m Depth,” 2008, 10 pages, publisher IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Hardy, Tim, et al., “Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) deployment and retrieval considerations for submarines,” Paper on UUV Development and Retrieval Options for Submarines, Apr. 2008, pp. 1-15, publisher BMT Defense Services Ltd., Bath, United Kingdom. |
Cowen, Steve, “Flying Plug: A Small UUV Designed for Submarine Data Connectivity (U),” Abstract, 1997, 21 pages, publisher PN. |
Gish, Lynn Andrew, “Design of an AUV Recharging System,” 2004, 134 pages, publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
Vandenberg, Troy D., “Manning and Maintainability of a Submarine Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Program: A Systems Engineering Case Study,” Thesis, Sep. 2010, 137 pages, publisher Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. |
Griffiths, Gwyn, “Technology and Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” 2003, pp. 93-108, publisher Taylor & Franscis, New York, NY. |
Galletti Di Cadilhac, Robin, “Docketing System,” 2003, pp. 93-108, publisher Taylor & Franscis, New York, NY. |
Singh, Hanumant, et al., “AOSN MURI: Docketing for an Autonomous Ocean Sampling Network,” Program #: ONR-322 OM/AOSN N00014-95-1-13166, 1998, 6 pages, available at http://www.whoi.edu/DSL/hanu/. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/016976 dated Feb. 12, 2018, 18 pages. |
Foreign Communication from Related Counterpart Application, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/062518, International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated May 18, 2017, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170283021 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |