Modified flux composition for cement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5183506
  • Patent Number
    5,183,506
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 5, 1992
    33 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 2, 1993
    32 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Group; Karl
    Agents
    • Semmes; David H.
Abstract
A flux composition for cement comprises mainly wollastonite. One of the compositions of the flux is wollastonite 99%, fluorite 5-15% and gypsum 30-35%. The flux is added during the preparation of the cement raw materials and comprises 1-10% of the admixture. Thus, the firing temperature firing time may be shortened, the consumption of coal may be decreased and manufacturing productivity of the cement may be improved. In addition, the compression strength and the binding strength of the cement are also improved.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
Flux composition additives for manufacturing cements.
2. Description of the Prior Art
______________________________________SKALNY 4,135,941JOHNSON et al. 4,377,415VOTAVA 4,337,316KURZ 4,087,285LOWE 3,879,214Japan 71/22,765Japan 55-158,238______________________________________
"Advantages of Wollastonite", CA79(2):9202F USSR, SADUAKASOV, A.S. "Cement and Concrete Product".
O Bannon Dictionary of Ceramic Science and Engr. (1984) pp 109,261 and 278.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A flux composition for manufacturing cement comprising mainly low grade wollastonite. The flux is added during the preparation of the cement raw materials and comprises 1-10% of the admixture. Thus, the firing temperature may be reduced, the firing time may be shortened and coal consumption decreased, while enhancing manufacturing productivity. As a result, the compression strength and the binding strength of the cement are correspondingly enhanced.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
This invention relates to flux compositions for manufacturing cements.
In order to accelerate the formation of cement clinker, a small quantity of mineralizer is often added to the raw materials of cement. A composite mineralizer comprised of gypsum and fluorite has been developed in recent years which lowers the melting point of the cement raw materials. However, this composite mineralizer mixture may give rise to manufacturing defects, such as the "ring formation", and may also produce fluctuations in cement quality. Wollastonite is a mineral which has gained widespread application in various manufacturing processes, for example, it has been used as a component of ceramic material to greatly reduce firing temperature and firing time. To date, no one has attempted to use wollastonite as a main component of the composite mineralizer for cements.
An object of the invention is to develop a new mineralizer employing low-grade wollastonite so as to reduce the firing temperature of cement and shorten its firing time. This results in energy savings when manufacturing cements and improves overall productivity. For purposes of the present application, "low-grade wollastonite" contains 25%-70% by weight of calcium silicate minerals (CaSiO.sub.3) which does not meet standard application requirements in industry. In other words, "low-grade wollastonite" is treated as waste in the prior art. "Low-grate wollastonite" is available on the market.
Wollastonite belongs to the class of calcium silicate minerals (CaSiO.sub.3), having the chemical composition Ca.sub.3 (Si.sub.3)O.sub.9) wherein CaO is 48.3% and SiO.sub.2 is 51.7% by weight. Since wollastonite has a needle structure, it may improve the strength of a ceramic body by improving the compression strength. Based on the successful application of wollastonite in ceramic use, the present invention utilizes wollastonite and compounds such as gypsum and fluorite, to develop novel fluxes for cement with the following compositions:
1. wollastonite 50-99% , tremolite 1-50%;
2. wollastonite 50-65% , fluorite 5-15%, gypsum 30-35%;
3. wollastonite 50-98%, fluorite 1-20%, slag 1-30%.
The individual flux components are crushed and ground into the desired particle sizes ranging from 60 to 160 mesh. In the preferred embodiment, particle sizes will range from 80 to 100 mesh.
According to the present invention, the flux is added to raw materials of cement. The flux, when admixed or blended with the cement raw materials, comprises 1-10% of the cement-flux admixture. Preferably, the flux will average 3-5% of the admixture. The strength of the cement will vary depending on the amount of flux added to the cement. The concentration of free CaO in the flux-cement admixture may be measured to determine the optimal percent value of flux to be added to the cement raw materials.
A first embodiment of invention was based on composition 2 above of the flux for cement, utilized the percentage of individual compounds as listed in Table 1. Clinker raw materials were ground to pellet sizes ranging from 15 to 30 mm in diameter, preferably 25 mm. The pellets were fired in an electric oven for 20 minutes at 1350.degree. C. This firing temperature was approximately 100.degree. C. lower than conventional firing temperatures. Further, the amount of time required to keep constant temperature throughout the firing period was reduced by 30%. The resultant clinker was then analyzed for its chemical composition, including mineral content (%). The results are shown in Table 2.
The slag cement was prepared using the clinker formed hereinabove. The weight ratio among clinker, slag and gypsum was set as: clinker; slag; gypsum=50:50:2. The physical properties of the resultant cement are shown in Table 3.
A second embodiment of the present invention utilized composition 3 (see above) of the flux for cement. The percentages of individual compounds are listed in Table 4. The raw material pellets were prepared as described hereinabove. In this second embodiment of the invention, the percent of both limestone and slag was held constant, while percent concentrations were adjusted for fluorite, gypsum and wollastonite, Firing time was again reduced to approximately 20 minutes at a high temperature. The general chemical composition and mineral content of the resultant clinker is shown in Table 5.
The clinker, as prepared above, required only 20 minutes of firing, a reduction of 30% in firing time. This in turn conserved the amount of coal consumed during the firing process. The ratio for the cement mixture was: clinker prepared: gypsum=100: 4, and in preparing the slag cement the ratio was: clinker: slag: gypsum=50:50:4. The physical properties of the cement are listed in Table 6.
The distinguished effectiveness of the embodiments in comparison with the prior art is shown in Table 7.
Therefore, using the flux of the invention in the production of cement may not only shorten the firing time, reduce the amount of coal consumption, improve the discharge of flue gas and reduce the "ring formation" in the oven but, also, increase the compression strength of the cement by approximately 100Kg/cm2 or more, and increase the binding strength of the cement by 10Kg/cm2 or more.
Based on the above Composition 1 of the flux for cement, (wollastonite 50-99%, tremolite 1-50%), the percentages of individual compounds are listed in Table 8. The raw material pellets were prepared in sizes ranging from 12 to 14 mm in diameter. The pellets were fired in a kiln.
The general chemical composition and mineral content of the resultant clinker is shown in Table 9, in comparison with a control example in which no flux of the invention was used.
Table 10 shows the physical properties of the clinker.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Rate of Design ignition SIO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO CaF.sub.2 SO.sub.2 Other TotalComponent % loss % % % % % % % % % %__________________________________________________________________________Limestone 66.50 28.74 0.86 0.15 0.05 36.08 0.49 0.13 66.50Clay 12.50 0.90 8.26 1.90 0.78 0.05 0.31 0.30 12.50Iron powder 2.00 0.25 0.06 1.35 0.10 0.06 0.18 2.00Coal 13.00 9.96 1.69 0.83 0.24 0.17 0.06 0.05 13.00Flux 6.00 0.94 0.72 0.03 0.01 2.16 0.03 0.76 1.26 0.09 6.00Total 100 40.54 11.78 2.97 2.43 38.56 0.95 0.76 1.26 0.75 100Raw MaterialClinker 100 19.81 4.99 4.09 64.85 1.60 1.28 2.12 1.26 100__________________________________________________________________________ Black Raw Material Rate: KH = 0.98, N = 2.18, P = 1.22 Note: KH--Saturation coefficient of lime N--Rate of silice acid P--Rate of iron
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________(%)Rate of ignition loss SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO Total f-CaO KH n p C.sub.3 S C.sub.2 S C.sub.3 A C.sub.4 AF__________________________________________________________________________1.76 20.32 6.17 4.69 65.85 1.25 100.00 2.02 0.91 1.87 1.32 56.37 15.75 8.40 14.26__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ Water quantity Compression BendingSpecific added at stan- set time strength (kg/cm.sup.2) strength (kg/cm.sup.2)surface Fineness dard consistency Initial Ending 3 7 28 3 7 28(cm.sup.2 /g) (%) (%) (hr, min) (hr, min) Safety day day day day day day__________________________________________________________________________3160 7 21.5 1.30 3.20 Acceptable 307 523 648 59.00 74.50 89.50__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Rate of Design ignition SIO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO CaF.sub.2 SO.sub.3 Other TotalComponent % loss % % % % % % % % % %__________________________________________________________________________Limestone 67.50 28.25 1.04 0.49 0.16 36.21 0.37 0.98 67.50Slag 17.00 3.11 8.16 3.08 0.82 0.87 0.24 0.72 17.00Coal 8.00 6.08 1.05 0.49 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.14 8.00Flux 7.50 0.87 0.48 0.02 0.01 2.47 0.07 0.60 1.39 1.59 7.50Total 100 38.31 10.73 4.09 1.09 39.62 0.74 0.60 1.39 3.43 100Raw MaterialClinker 100 17.40 6.63 1.77 64.22 1.20 0.97 2.25 5.56 100__________________________________________________________________________ Black Raw Material Rate: KH = 1.06, N = 2.07, P = 3.74 Note: KH--Saturation coefficient of lime N--Rate of silice acid P--Rate of iron
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________(%)nnn SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO Sum f-CaO KH n p C.sub.3 S C.sub.2 S C.sub.3 A C.sub.4 AF__________________________________________________________________________1.32 18.82 5.85 2.02 63.94 1.18 93.13 3.44 0.95 2.39 2.90 60.78 8.10 12.07 6.14__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________ Water quantity Compression BendingSpecific added at stan- set time strength (kg/cm.sup.2) strength (kg/cm.sup.2) surface Fineness dard consistency Initial Ending 3 7 28 3 7 28material (cm.sup.2 /g) (%) (%) (hr, min) (hr, min) Safety day day day day day day__________________________________________________________________________Clinker 3310 65 22.5 2.10 4.31 Acceptable 342 484 646 59 68 85slag 3215 7 22.5 2.50 5.42 Acceptable 129 256 462 33 61 82__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________No. Title Unit Prior Art Embodiment Note__________________________________________________________________________1. Heat consumption kcal/kg 1174 754 Reduction 35.7%2. Ignition loss % 40 36 Average reduction 4%3. Firing time of Min 30 20 Less clinker at high 33.3% temperature4. Strength kg/cm.sup.2 Compressing strength Compressing strength Increasing 119 527 646 Increasing 17 Bending strength 68 Bending strength 855. Kiln sintering Ring forming and Hardly lumping lumping easily6. Draining of flue Black White with black gas7. Time period for Day 15 7 Less 8 days settling safety8. Grindability Solid and compact, Fragile, grinding hard for grinding easily__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________ Rate of ignition SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO Other TotalComponent loss % % % % % % % %__________________________________________________________________________Limestone 30.36 1.99 0.22 0.15 38.88 0.39 1.21 73.2Clay 0.33 4.43 0.72 0.36 0.07 0.06 0.03 6.00Iron 0.11 0.88 0.19 1.53 0.04 0.03 0.22 3.00powderCoal 7.49 4.00 2.31 0.63 0.08 0.11 0.18 14.80Flux 0.16 1.34 0.01 0.02 1.06 0.24 0.17 3.00Total Raw 39.22 12.19 4.13 2.62 40.13 0.83 1.81 100MaterialClinker 0 20.06 6.79 4.31 66.03 1.37__________________________________________________________________________ Black Raw Material Rate: KH = 0.95, N = 1.8, P = 1.8 Note: KH--Saturation coefficient of lime N--Rate of silice acid P--Rate of iron
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________(%)Flux of the Rate ofinvention ignitionadded loss SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 CaO MgO Total f-CaO KH KH.sup.- n p C.sub.3 S C.sub.2 S C.sub.3 A C.sub.4__________________________________________________________________________ AF0 0.42 19.37 6.21 4.62 64.51 0.98 98.15 2.92 0.94 0.89 1.79 1.34 49.32 18.32 8.62 14.043 0.45 19.98 5.81 4.53 65.13 0.97 98.65 1.79 0.94 0.91 1.93 1.28 55.42 15.46 7.71 13.77__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________ Compression Bending strength strengthFlux of the Specific set time (kg/cm.sup.3) (kg/cm.sup.3)invention surface Fineness consistency initial Ending 3 7 28 3 7 28added (%) (cm.sup.3 /g) (%) (%) (hr, min) (hr, min) Safety day day day day day day__________________________________________________________________________0 3030 5 23.50 1:56 3:01 Unacceptable 275 406 582 57 68 803 3210 5 23.75 3:15 4:20 Acceptable 437 592 756 75 90 97__________________________________________________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A composition for producing cement, comprising cement raw materials and 1-10% by weight of a flux composition, consisting essentially of by weight:
  • ______________________________________low grade wollastonite 50-99%, andtremolite 1-50%.______________________________________
  • 2. A composition for producing cement, comprising cement raw materials and 1-10% by weight of a flux composition, consisting essentially of by weight
  • ______________________________________low grade wollastonite 50-65%,flourite 5-15%, andgypsum 30-35%.______________________________________
  • 3. A composition for producing cement, comprising cement raw materials and 1-10% by weight of a flux composition, consisting essentially of
  • ______________________________________low grade wollastonite 50-98%,flourite 1-20%, andslag 1-30%.______________________________________
  • 4. The composition for producing cement of claim 1 incorporating 3-5% by weight of the flux.
  • 5. The composition for producing cement of claim 2 incorporating 3-5% by weight of the flux.
  • 6. The composition for producing cement of claim 3 incorporating 3-5% by weight of the flux.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
87/105757 Aug 1987 CNX
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/578,902, filed Sep. 7, 1990, now abandoned, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/234,125, filed Aug. 19, 1988, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
3879214 Lowe et al. Apr 1975
4087285 Kurz May 1978
4135941 Skalny et al. Jan 1979
4337316 Votava Jun 1982
4377415 Johnson et al. Mar 1983
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
46-22765 Apr 1971 JPX
55-158238 Dec 1980 JPX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Saduakasov, "Advantages of Wollastonite as Cement Raw Material" CA 79(2):9202f.
O'Bannon, Dictionary of Ceramic Science and Engineering Plenum Press pp. 278, 261, 109.
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 578902 Sep 1990
Parent 234125 Aug 1988