Modified formation testing apparatus with borehole grippers and method of formation testing

Abstract
An apparatus and method for obtaining samples of pristine formation or; formation fluid, using a work string designed for performing other downhole work such as drilling, workover operations, or re-entry operations. An extendable element extends against the formation wall to obtain the pristine formation or fluid sample. The apparatus includes at least one extendable gripper element for anchoring the apparatus during testing and sampling operations.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to the testing of underground formations or reservoirs. More particularly, this invention relates to a method and apparatus for isolating a downhole reservoir, and testing the reservoir formation and fluid.




2. Background




While drilling a well for commercial development of hydrocarbon reserves, several subterranean reservoirs and formations are encountered. In order to discover information about the formations, such as whether the reservoirs contain hydrocarbons, logging devices have been incorporated into drill strings to evaluate several characteristics of these reservoirs. Measurement-while-drilling systems (hereinafter MWD) have been developed that contain resistivity, nuclear and other logging devices which can constantly monitor formation and reservoir characteristics during drilling of wellbores. The MWD systems can generate data that includes information about the presence of hydrocarbon presence, saturation levels, and formation porosity. Telemetry systems have been developed for use with the MWD systems to transmit the data to the surface. A common telemetry method is the mud-pulsed system, an example of which is found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,733,233. MWD systems provide real time analysis of the subterranean reservoirs.




Commercial development of -hydrocarbon fields requires significant amounts of capital. Before field development begins, operators desire to have as much data as possible in order to evaluate the reservoir for commercial viability. Despite the advances in data acquisition during drilling, using the MWD systems, it is often necessary to conduct further testing of the hydrocarbon reservoirs in order to obtain additional data. Therefore, after the well has been drilled, the hydrocarbon zones are often tested by other test equipment.




One type of post-drilling test involves producing fluid from the reservoir, collecting samples, shutting-in the well and allowing the pressure to build-up to a static level. This sequence may be repeated several times for different reservoirs within a given borehole. This type of test is known as a “Pressure Build-up Test”. One of the important aspects of the data collected during such a test is the pressure build-up information gathered after drawing the pressure down. From this data, information can be derived as to permeability, and size of the reservoir. Further, actual samples of the reservoir fluid are obtained, and tested to gather Pressure-Volume-Temperature data relevant to the reservoir's hydrocarbon distribution.




In order to perform these important tests, it is currently necessary to retrieve the drill string from the well borehole. Thereafter, a different tool, designed for the testing, is run into the well borehole. A wireline is often used to lower a test tool into the well borehole. The test tool sometimes utilizes packers for isolating the reservoir. Numerous communication devices have been designed which provide for manipulation of the test tool, or alternatively, provide for data transmission from the test tool. Some of those designs include signaling from the surface of the Earth with pressure pulses, through the fluid in the well borehole, to or from a downhole microprocessor located within, or associated with the test tool. Alternatively, a wire line can be lowered from the surface, into a landing receptacle located within a test tool, establishing electrical signal communication between the surface and the test assembly. Regardless of the type of test tool and type of communication system used, the amount of time and money required for retrieving the drill string and running a second test tool into the borehole is significant. Further, if the borehole is highly deviated, a wire line tool is difficult to use to perform the testing.




There is also another type of problem, related to downhole pressure conditions, which can occur during drilling. The density of the drilling fluid is calculated to achieve maximum drilling efficiency while maintaining safety, and the density is dependent upon the desired relationship between the weight of the drilling mud column and the downhole pressures which will be encountered. As different formations are penetrated during drilling, the downhole pressures can change significantly. Currently available devices do not accurately sense the formation pressure as the drill bit penetrates the formation. The actual formation pressure could be lower than expected, allowing the lowering of mud density, or the formation pressure could be higher than expected, possibly even resulting in a pressure kick Consequently, since this information is not easily available to the operator, the drilling mud may be maintained at too high or too. low a density for maximum efficiency and maximum safety.




Therefore, there is a need for a method and apparatus that will allow for the pressure testing and fluid sampling of potential hydrocarbon reservoirs as soon as the borehole has been drilled into the reservoir, without removal of the drill string. Further, there is a need for a method and apparatus that will allow for adjusting drilling fluid density in response to changes in downhole pressures to achieve maximum drilling efficiency. Finally, there is a need for a method and apparatus that will allow for blow out prevention downhole, to promote drilling safety.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A formation testing method and a test apparatus are disclosed. The test apparatus is mounted on a work string for use in a well borehole filled with fluid. It can be a work string designed for drilling, re-entry work, or workover applications. As required for many of these applications, the work string may be one capable of going into highly deviated holes, horizontally, or even uphill. Therefore, in order to be fully useful to accomplish the purposes of the present invention, the work string must be one that is capable of being forced into the hole, rather than being dropped like a wireline. The work string can contain a Measurement While Drilling (MWD) system and a drill bit, or other operative elements. The formation test apparatus may include at least one expandable packer or other extendable structure that can expand or extend to contact the wall of the well borehole; device for moving fluid such as a pump, for taking in formation -fluid; a non-rotating sleeve; an extendable stabilizer blade; a coring device, and at least one sensor for measuring a characteristic of the fluid or the formation. The test apparatus will also contain a controller, for controlling the various valves or pumps which are used to control fluid flow. The sensors and other instrumentation and control equipment must be carried by the tool. The tool must have a communication system capable of communicating with the surface, and data can be telemetered to the surface or stored in a downhole memory for later retrieval.




The method involves drilling or re-entering a borehole and selecting an appropriate underground reservoir. The pressure, or some other characteristic of the fluid in the well borehole at the reservoir, the rock, or both, can then be measured. The extendable element, such as a packer or test probe, is set against the wall of the borehole to isolate a portion of the borehole or at least a portion of the borehole wall. In the non-rotatable sleeve embodiment, the drill string can continue rotating and advancing while the sleeve is held stationary during performance of the test.




If two packers are used, this will create an upper annulus, a lower annulus, and an intermediate annulus within the well borehole. The intermediate annulus corresponds to the isolated portion of the borehole, and it is positioned at the reservoir to be tested. Next, the pressure, or other property, within the intermediate annulus is measured. The well borehole fluid, primarily-drilling-mud, may then be withdrawn from the intermediate annulus with the pump. The level at which pressure within the intermediate annulus stabilizes may then be measured; it will correspond to the formation pressure. Pressure can also be applied to fracture the formation, or to perform a pressure test of the formation. Additional extendable elements may also be provided, to isolate two or more permeable zones. This allows the pumping of fluid from one or more zones to one or more other zones.




Alternatively, a piston or other test probe can be extended from the test apparatus to contact the borehole wall in a sealing relationship, or some other expandable element can be extended to create a zone from which essentially pristine formation fluid can be withdrawn. Further, the extendable probe can be used to position a sensor directly against the borehole wall, for analysis of the formation, such as by spectroscopy. Extension of the probe could also be accomplished by extending a locating arm or stabilizer rib from one side of the test tool, to force the opposite side of the test tool to contact the borehole wall, thereby exposing a sample port to the formation fluid. Regardless of the apparatus used, the goal is to establish a zone of pristine formation fluid from which a fluid or core sample can be taken, or in which characteristics of the fluid can be measured. This can be accomplished by various embodiments. The example first mentioned above is to use inflatable packers to isolate a portion of the entire borehole, subsequently withdrawing drilling fluid from the isolated portion until it fills with formation fluid. The other examples given accomplish the goal by expanding an element against a spot on the borehole wall, thereby directly contacting the formation and excluding drilling fluid.




The apparatus should be constructed so as to be protected during performance of the primary operations for which the work string is intended, such as drilling, re-entry, or workover. If an extendable probe is used, it can retract within the tool, or it can be protected by adjacent stabilizers, or both. A packer or other extendable elastomeric element can retract within a recess in the tool, or it can be protected by a sleeve or some other type of cover.




In addition to the pressure sensor mentioned above, the formation test apparatus can contain a resistivity sensor for measuring the resistivity of the well borehole fluid and the formation fluid, or other types of sensors. The resistivity of the drilling fluid is usually noticeably different from the resistivity of the formation fluid. If two packers are used, the resistivity of fluid being pumped from the intermediate annulus can be monitored to determine when all of the drilling fluid has been withdrawn from the intermediate annulus. As flow is induced from the isolated formation into the intermediate annulus, the resistivity of the fluid being pumped from the intermediate annulus is monitored. Once the resistivity of the exiting fluid differs sufficiently from the resistivity of the well borehole fluid, it is assumed that formation fluid has filled the intermediate annulus, and the flow is terminated. This can also be used to verify a proper seal of the packers, since leaking of drilling fluid past the packers would tend to maintain the resistivity at the level of the drilling fluid. Other types of sensors which can be incorporated are flow rate measuring devices, viscosity sensors, density measuring devices,- dielectric property measuring devices, and optical spectroscopes.




After shutting in the formation, the pressure in the intermediate annulus can be monitored. Pumping can also be resumed, to withdraw formation fluid from the intermediate annulus at a measured rate. Pumping of formation fluid and measurement of pressure can be sequenced -as desired to provide data which can be used to calculate various properties of the formation, such as permeability and size. If direct contact with the borehole wall is used, rather than isolating a section of the borehole, similar tests can be performed by incorporating test chambers within the test apparatus. The test chambers can be maintained at atmospheric pressure while the work string is being drilled or lowered into the borehole. Then, when the extendable element has been placed in contact with the formation, exposing a test port to the formation fluid, a test chamber can be selectively placed in fluid communication with the test port. Since the formation fluid will be at much higher pressure than atmospheric, the formation fluid will flow into the test chamber. In this way, several test chambers can be used to perform different pressure tests or take fluid samples.




In some embodiments which use expandable packers, the formation test apparatus has contained therein a drilling fluid return flow passageway for allowing return flow of the drilling fluid from the lower annulus to the upper annulus. Also included is at least one pump, which can be a Venturi pump or any other suitable type of pump, for preventing overpressurization in an intermediate annulus. Overpressurization can be undesirable because of the possible loss of the packer seal, or because it can hamper operation of extendable elements which may be operated by differential pressure between the inner bore of the work string and the annulus, or by a fluid pump. To prevent overpressurization, the drilling fluid is pumped down the longitudinal. inner bore of the work string, past the lower end of the work string (which is generally the bit), and up the annulus. Then the fluid is channeled through return flow passageway and the Venturi pump, creating a low pressure zone at the Venturi, so that the fluid within the intermediate annulus is held at a lower pressure than the fluid in the return flow passageway.




The device may also include a circulation valve, for opening and closing the inner bore of the work string. A shunt valve can be located in the work string and operatively associated with the circulation valve, for allowing flow from the inner bore of the work string to the annulus around the work string, when the circulation valve is closed. These valves can be used in operating the test apparatus as a down hole blow-out preventor.




In most embodiments, one or more gripper elements may be incorporated on the work string or non-rotating sleeve. The grippers are extendable and are used to engage the borehole well. Once the borehole wall is engaged, the grippers anchor the work string or non-rotating sleeve such that the work string or non-rotating sleeve remains substantially motionless during a test. The advantage of anchoring the tool is increased useful life of soft components such as pad members and packers.




In the case where an influx of reservoir fluids invade the borehole, which is sometimes referred to as a “kick”, the method includes the steps of setting the expandable packers, and then positioning the circulating valve in the closed position. The packers are set at a position that is above the influx zone so that the influx zone is isolated. Next, the shunt valve is placed in the open position. Additives can then be added to the drilling fluid, thereby increasing the density of the mud. The heavier mud is circulated down the work string, through the shunt valve, to fill the annulus. Once the circulation of the denser drilling fluid is completed, the packers can be unseated and the circulation valve can be opened. Drilling may then resume.




An advantage of the present invention includes use of the pressure and resistivity sensors with the MWD system, to allow for real time data transmission of those measurements. Another advantage is that the present invention allows obtaining static pressures, pressure build-ups, and pressure draw-downs with the work string, such as a drill string, in place. Computation of permeability and other reservoir parameters based on the pressure measurements can be accomplished without pulling the drill string.




The packers can be set multiple times, so that testing of several zones is possible. By making-measurement of the down hole conditions possible -in real time, optimum drilling fluid conditions can be determined which will aid in hole cleaning, drilling safety, and drilling speed. When an influx of reservoir fluid and gas enter the well borehole, the high pressure is contained within the lower part of the well borehole, significantly reducing risk of being exposed to these pressures at surface. Also, by shutting-in the well borehole immediately above the critical zone, the volume of the influx into the well borehole is significantly reduced.




The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, will be best understood from the attached drawings, taken along with the following description in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts, and in which:











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a detailed understanding of the present invention, references should be made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like elements have been given like numerals and wherein:





FIG. 1

is a partial section view of the apparatus of the present invention as it would be used with a floating drilling rig;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of one embodiment of the present invention, incorporating expandable packers;





FIG. 3

is a section view of the embodiment of the present invention shown in

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a section view of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, with the addition of a sample chamber;





FIG. 5

is a section view of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, illustrating the flow path of drilling fluid;





FIG. 6

is a section view of a circulation valve and a shunt valve which can be incorporated into the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 7

is a section view of another embodiment of the present invention, showing the use of a centrifugal pump to drain the intermediate annulus;





FIG. 8

is a schematic of the control system and the communication system which can be used in the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a partial section view of the apparatus of the present invention, showing more than two extendable elements;





FIG. 10

is a section view of the apparatus of the present invention, showing one embodiment of a coring device;





FIG. 11

is a perspective view of the apparatus of the present invention utilizing a non-rotating sleeve;





FIG. 12

is a section view of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 11

;





FIG. 13

is a schematic view of an embodiment of the present invention incorporating gripper elements;





FIG. 14

is a perspective view of an embodiment of the present invention showing gripper elements integral to stabilizers and an extendible pad element integral to a stabilizer;





FIG. 15

is a schematic view of an embodiment of the present invention incorporating gripper elements and showing a mode of operation wherein the gripper elements and pad element are retracted during testing; and





FIG. 16

is a perspective view of an embodiment of the present invention: that includes- integrated stabilizers and grippers, packers and an extendable pad element.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a typical drilling rig


2


with a well borehole


4


extending therefrom is illustrated, as is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. The drilling rig


2


has a work string


6


, which in the embodiment shown is a drill string. The work string


6


has attached thereto a drill bit


8


for drilling the well borehole


4


. The present invention is also useful in other types of work strings, and it is useful with jointed tubing as well as coiled tubing or other small diameter work string such as snubbing pipe.

FIG. 1

depicts the drilling rig


2


positioned on a drill ship S with a riser extending from the drilling ship S to the sea floor F.




If applicable, the work string


6


can have a downhole drill motor


10


. Incorporated in the drill string


6


above the drill bit


8


is a mud pulse telemetry system


12


, which can incorporate at least one sensor


14


, such as a nuclear logging instrument. The sensors


14


sense down hole characteristics of the well borehole, the bit, and the reservoir, with such sensors being well known in the art. The bottom hole assembly also contains the formation test apparatus


16


of the present invention, which will be described in greater detail hereinafter. As can be seen, one or more subterranean reservoirs


18


are intersected by the well borehole


4


.





FIG. 2

shows one embodiment of the formation test apparatus


16


in a perspective view, with the expandable packers


24


,


26


withdrawn into recesses in the body of the tool. Stabilizer ribs


20


are also shown between the packers


24


,


26


, arranged around the circumference of the tool, and extending radially outwardly. Also shown are the inlet ports to several drilling fluid return flow passageways


36


and a draw down passageway


41


to be described in more detail below.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, one embodiment of the formation test apparatus


16


is shown positioned adjacent the reservoir


18


. The test apparatus


16


contains an upper expandable packer


24


and a lower expandable packer


26


for sealingly engaging the wall of the well borehole


4


. The packers


24


,


26


can be expanded by any method known in the art. Inflatable packers are well known in the art, with inflation being accomplished by injecting a pressurized fluid into the packer. Optional covers for the expandable packer elements may also be included to shield the packer elements from the damaging effects of rotation in the well borehole, collision with the wall of the well borehole, and other forces encountered during drilling, or other work performed by the work string.




A high pressure drilling fluid passageway


27


is formed between the longitudinal internal bore


7


and an expansion element control valve


30


. An inflation fluid passageway


28


conducts fluid from a first port of the control valve


30


to the packers


24


,


26


. The inflation fluid passageway


28


branches off into a first branch


28


A that is connected to the inflatable packer


26


and a second branch


28


B that is connected to the inflatable packer


24


. A second port of the control valve


30


is connected to a drive fluid passageway


29


, which leads to a cylinder


35


formed within the body of the test tool


16


. A third port of the control valve


30


is connected to a low pressure passageway


31


, which leads to one of the return flow passageways


36


. Alternatively, the low pressure passageway


31


could lead to a Venturi pump


38


or to a centrifugal pump


53


which will be discussed further below. The control valve


30


and the other control elements to be discussed are operable by a downhole electronic control system


100


seen in

FIG. 8

, which will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter.




It can be seen that the control valve


30


can be selectively positioned to pressurize the cylinder


35


or the packers


24


,


26


with high pressure drilling fluid flowing in the longitudinal bore


7


. This can cause the piston


45


or the packers


24


,


26


to extend into contact with the wall of the borehole


4


. Once this extension has been achieved, repositioning the control valve


30


can lock the extended element in place. It can also be seen that the control valve


30


can be selectively positioned to place the cylinder


35


or the packers


24


,


26


in fluid communication with a passageway of lower pressure, such as the return flow passageway


36


. When spring returns are utilized in the cylinder


35


or the packers


24


,


26


, as is well known in the art, the piston


45


will retract into the cylinder


35


, and the packers


24


,


26


will retract within their respective recesses. Alternatively, as will be explained below in the discussion of

FIG. 7

, the low pressure passageway


31


can be connected to a suction device, such as a pump, to draw the piston


45


within the cylinder


35


, or to draw the packers


24


,


26


into their recesses.




Once the inflatable packers


24


,


26


have been inflated, an upper annulus


32


, an intermediate annulus


33


, and a lower annulus


34


are formed. This can be more clearly seen in FIG.


5


. The inflated packers


24


,


26


isolate a portion of the well borehole


4


adjacent the reservoir


18


which is to be tested. Once the packers


24


,


26


are set against the wall of the well borehole


4


, an accurate volume within the intermediate annulus


33


may be calculated, which is useful in pressure testing techniques.




The test apparatus


16


also contains at least one fluid sensor system


46


for sensing properties of the various fluids to be encountered. The sensor system


46


can include a resistivity sensor for determining the resistivity of the fluid. Also, a dielectric sensor for sensing the dielectric properties of the fluid, and a pressure sensor for sensing the fluid pressure may be included. Other types of sensors which can be incorporated are flow rate measuring devices, viscosity sensors, density measuring devices, a nuclear magnetic resonance sensor, and optical spectroscopes. A series of passageways


40


A,


40


B,


40


C, and


40


D are also provided for accomplishing various objectives, such as drawing a pristine formation fluid sample through the piston


45


, conducting the fluid to a sensor


46


, and returning the fluid to the return flow passageway


36


. A sample fluid passageway


40


A passes through the piston


45


from its outer face


47


to a side port


49


. A sealing element


47


A can be provided on the outer face


47


of the piston


45


to ensure that the sample obtained is pristine formation fluid. This in effect isolates a portion of the well borehole from the drilling fluid or any other contaminants or pressure sources.




Alternatively, the outer face


47


of the piston


45


can constitute or incorporate a formation evaluation sensor, for analysis of the formation itself, such as by spectroscopy. The sensor could also be in the pad.




When the piston


45


is extended from the tool, the piston side port


49


can align with a side port


51


in the cylinder


35


. A pump inlet passageway


40


B connects the cylinder side port


51


to the inlet of a pump


53


. The pump


53


can be a centrifugal pump driven by a turbine wheel


55


or by another suitable drive device. The turbine wheel


55


can be driven by flow through a bypass passageway


84


between the longitudinal bore


7


and the return flow passageway


36


. Alternatively, the pump


53


and other devices in this tool can be any other type of suitable power source. Some examples for power generation alternatives include a turbine driven alternator, a turbine driven hydraulic pump, a positive displacement motor driving a hydraulic pump, and rotation of the drill string relative to the non-rotating sleeve to drive an alternator or a hydraulic pump. Obviously, combinations of these power sources could also be used. A pump outlet passageway


40


C is connected between the outlet of the pump


53


and the sensor system


46


. A sample fluid return passageway


40


D is connected between the sensor


46


and the return flow passageway


36


. The passageway


40


D has therein a valve


48


for opening and closing the passageway


40


D.




As seen in

FIG. 4

, there can be a sample collection passageway


40


E which connects the passageways


40


A,


40


B,


40


C, and


40


D with the lower sample module, seen generally at


52


. The passageway


40


E leads to the adjustable choke


74


and to the sample chamber


56


, for collecting a sample. The sample collection passageway


40


E has therein a chamber inlet valve


58


for opening and closing the entry into the sample chamber


56


. The sample chamber


56


can have a movable baffle


72


for separating the sample fluid from a compressible fluid such as air, to facilitate drawing the sample as will be discussed below. An outlet passage from the sample chamber


56


is also provided, with a chamber outlet valve


62


therein, which can be a manual valve. Also, there is provided a sample expulsion valve


60


, which can be a manual valve. The passageways from valves


60


and


62


are connected to external ports (not shown) on the tool. The valves


62


and


60


allow for the removal of the sample fluid once the work string


6


has been pulled from the well borehole, as will be discussed below. Alternatively, the sample chamber


56


can be made wireline retrievable, by methods well known in the art.




When the packers


24


,


26


are inflated, they will seal against the wall of the well borehole


4


, and as they continue to expand to a firm set, the packers


24


,


26


will expand slightly into the intermediate annulus


33


. If fluid is trapped within the intermediate annulus


33


, this expansion can tend to increase the pressure in the intermediate annulus


33


to a level above the pressure in the lower annulus


34


and the upper annulus


32


. For operation of extendable elements such as the piston


45


, it is desired to have the pressure in the longitudinal bore


7


of the drill string


6


higher than the pressure in the intermediate annulus


33


. Therefore, a Venturi pump


38


is used to prevent overpressurization of the intermediate annulus


33


.




The drill string


6


contains several drilling fluid return flow passageways


36


for allowing return flow of the drilling fluid from the lower annulus


34


to the upper annulus


32


, when the packers


24


,


26


are expanded. A Venturi pump


38


is provided within at least one of the return flow passageways


36


, and its structure is designed for creating a zone of lower pressure, which can be used to prevent overpressurization in the intermediate annulus


33


, via the draw down passageway


41


and the draw down control valve


42


. Similarly, the Venturi pump


38


could be connected to the low pressure passageway


31


, so that the low pressure zone created by the Venturi pump


38


could be used to withdraw the piston


45


or the packers


24


,


26


. Alternatively, as explained below in the discussion of

FIG. 7

, another type of pump could be used for this purpose.




Several return flow passageways can be provided, as shown in FIG.


2


. One return flow passageway


36


is used to operate the Venturi pump


38


. As seen in FIG.


3


and

FIG. 4

, the return flow passageway


36


has a generally constant internal diameter until the Venturi restriction


70


is encountered. As shown in

FIG. 5

, the drilling fluid is pumped down the longitudinal bore


7


of the work string


6


, to exit near the lower end of the drill string at the drill bit


8


, and to return up the annular space as denoted by the flow arrows. Assuming that the inflatable packers


24


,


26


have been set and a seal has been achieved against the well borehole


4


, then the annular flow will be diverted through the return flow passageways


36


. As the flow approaches the Venturi restriction


70


, a pressure drop occurs such that the Venturi effect will cause a low pressure zone in the Venturi. This low pressure zone communicates with the intermediate annulus


33


through the draw down passageway


41


, preventing any overpressurization of the intermediate annulus


33


.




The return flow passageway


36


also contains an inlet valve


39


and an outlet valve


80


, for opening and closing the return flow passageway


36


, so that the upper annulus


32


can be isolated from the lower annulus


34


. The bypass passageway


84


connects the longitudinal bore


7


of the work string


6


to the return flow passageway


36


.




Referring now to

FIG. 6

, yet another possible feature of the present invention is shown, wherein the work string


6


has installed therein a circulation valve


90


, for opening and closing the inner bore


7


of the work string


6


. Also included is a shunt valve


92


, located in the shunt passageway


94


, for allowing flow from the inner bore


7


of the work string


6


to the upper annulus


32


. The remainder of the formation tester is the same as previously described.




The circulation valve


90


and the shunt valve


2


are operatively associated with the control system


100


. In order to operate the circulation valve


90


, a mud pulse signal is transmitted down hole, thereby signaling the control system


100


to shift the position of the valve


90


. The same sequence would be necessary in order to operate the shunt valve


92


.





FIG. 7

illustrates an alternative method of performing the functions performed by the Venturi pump


38


. The centrifugal pump


53


can have its inlet connected to the draw down passageway


41


and to the low pressure passageway


31


. A draw down valve


57


and a sample inlet valve


59


are provided in the pump inlet passageway to the intermediate annulus and the piston, respectively. The pump inlet passageway is also connected to the low pressure side of the control valve


30


. This allows use of the pump


53


, or another similar pump, to withdraw fluid from the intermediate annulus


33


through valve


57


, to withdraw a sample of formation fluid directly from the formation through valve


59


, or to pump down the cylinder


35


or the packers


24


,


26


.





FIG. 7

also shows a system for applying fluid pressure to the formation, either via the intermediate annulus


33


or via the sample inlet valve


59


. The purpose of applying this fluid pressure may be either to fracture the formation, or to perform a pressure test of the formation. A pump inlet valve


120


and a pump outlet valve


122


are provided in the inlet and outlet, respectively, of the pump


53


. The pump inlet valve


120


can be positioned as shown to align the pump inlet with the low pressure passageway


31


as required for the operations described above. Alternatively, the pump inlet valve


120


can be rotated clockwise a quarter turn by the control system


100


to align the pump inlet with the return -flow passageway


36


. Similarly, the pump outlet valve


122


can be positioned as shown to align the pump outlet with the return flow passageway


36


as required for the operations described above. Alternatively, the pump outlet valve


122


can be rotated clockwise a quarter turn by the control system


100


to align the pump outlet with the low pressure passageway


31


. With the pump inlet valve


120


aligned to connect the pump inlet with the return flow passageway


36


and the pump outlet valve


122


aligned to connect the pump outlet with the low pressure passageway


31


, the pump


53


can be operated to draw fluid from the return flow passageway


36


to pressurize the formation via the low pressure passageway


31


. Pressurization of the formation can be through the extendable piston


45


, with the sample inlet valve


59


open and the draw down valve


57


shut. Alternatively, pressurization of the formation can be through the annulus


33


, with the sample inlet valve


59


shut and the draw down valve


57


open.




As depicted in

FIG. 8

, the invention includes use of a control system


100


for controlling the various valves and pumps, and for receiving the output of the sensor system


46


. The control system


100


is capable of processing the sensor information with the downhole microprocessor/controller


102


, and delivering the data to the communications interface


104


, so that the processed data can then be telemetered to the surface using conventional technology. It should be noted that various forms of transmission energy could be used such as mud pulse, acoustical, optical, or electromagnetic. The communications interface


104


can be powered by a downhole electrical power source


106


. The power source.


106


also powers the flow line sensor system


46


, the microprocessor/controller


102


, and the various valves and pumps.




Communication with the surface of the Earth can be effected via the work string


6


in the form of pressure pulses or other methods, as is well known in the art In the case of mud pulse generation, the pressure pulse will be received at the surface via the 2-way communication interface


108


. The data thus received will be delivered to the surface computer


110


for interpretation and display.




Command signals may be sent down the fluid column by the communications interface


108


, to be received by the downhole communications interface


104


. The signals so received are delivered to the downhole microprocessor/controller


102


. The controller


102


will then signal the appropriate valves and pumps for operation as desired.




A bi-directional communication system as known in the art can be used. The purpose of the two-way communication system, or bidirectional data link, would be both to receive data from the downhole tool and to be able to control the downhole tool from surface by sending messages or commands.




Data measured from the downhole tool, the MWD formation tester, needs to be transmitted to surface in order to utilize the measured data for real-time decisions and monitoring the drilling process. This can be data relating to measurements that are obtained from the subsurface formation, such as the formation pressure information about optical properties or resistivity of the fluid, annulus pressure, pressure build-up or draw-down data, etc. The tool also needs to be able to transmit to surface information that is used to control the tool during its operation. For instance, information about pressure inside the packers versus pressure in the annulus might be monitored to determine seal quality, information about fluid properties from the optical fluid analyzer or the resistivity sensor might be used to monitor when a sufficiently clean fluid is being produced from the formation, or status information pertaining to completion of operational steps might be monitored so that the surface operator, if required, can determine when to activate the next operational step. One example could be that a code is pulsed to surface when an operation is completed, for instance, activation of packer elements or extending a pad or other device to engage contact with the borehole wall. This data, or code, is then used by the operator to control the operation of the tool. Additionally, the downhole tool could transmit to surface information concerning the status of its health and information pertaining to the quality of the measurements.




In addition to being stored downhole, data may be transmitted from the, downhole tool to surface in several ways. Most commonly used are pressure pulses, in the mud system, either inside the drill pipe or up the outside annulus. Information may also be sent through the drill pipe itself, for instance, by the use of an acoustic signal, or if the drill pipe is connected with an electric, fiber optic or other type of, cable-or conductor, a signal can be sent through these. Also, the signal may be sent through the earth itself, as electromagnetic or acoustic waves. Regardless of the technique used, the purpose is to transmit information from the downhole tool to a receiving surface system that is capable of de-coding, presenting and storing this data.




The operation of the MWD formation tester technology may require that the tool be controlled from the surface. It may or may not be possible to program the tool to perform a sequence of operational steps that enables the tool to complete the measurement and testing process without surface intervention. Even if it is possible to program the tool for a complete sequence of events, it may be desirable to be able to interfere with the operation and, for instance, instruct the tool to start a new sequence of events, or to send commands to instruct the tool to discontinue its operation and revert to stand-by mode, for instance, if an emergency situation should occur. One system where data is sent both to and from a downhole tool is already in existence. On this system, the data is sent from surface to downhole by using a flow diverter on the surface to control the mud flow into the drill string. Variations in mud flow are picked up as signals by the downhole tool through measured variations in RPM of the power turbine of the downhole tool. Through a pre-set transmission code, the surface system can communicate with the downhole system. The system also includes sending a code from downhole to surface as a confirmation of having received a message from surface. Messages can be sent from surface to the downhole tool in many ways. Described above is a method of using variances in flow rate through the tool as a way of conveying information. It may also be possible to send information downhole using pressure pulses created at surface that travel through the drill pipe or the annulus and that are picked up by pressure sensor(s) in the downhole tool. Also, information can be sent down through an electric cable or a fibre optic cable, as will typically be the case when operating the formation tester on coiled tubing or through jointed drill pipe (using an acoustic signal), or through the earth (using an electromagnetic or acoustic signal). Regardless of the technique used, the purpose is to transmit information from surface to the downhole tool to be able to activate, re-program, control or in some way manipulate the downhole tool.




The down hole microprocessor/controller


102


can also contain a pre-programmed sequence of steps based on pre-determined criteria. Therefore, as the down hole data, such as pressure, resistivity, flow rate, viscosity, density, spectral analysis or other data from an optical sensor, or dielectric constants, are received, the microprocessor/controller would automatically send command signals via the controller to manipulate the various valves and pumps.




As shown in

FIG. 9

, it can be useful to have two or more sets of extendable packers, with associated test apparatus


16


therebetween. One set of packers can isolate a first formation, while another set of packers can isolate a second formation. The apparatus can then be used to pump formation fluid from the first formation into the second formation. This function can be performed either from one annulus


33


at the first formation to another annulus


33


at the second formation, using the extended packers for isolation of the formations. Alternatively, this function can be performed via sample fluid passageways


40


A in the two sets of test apparatus


16


, using the extended pistons


45


for isolation of the formations. For instance, referring again to

FIG. 7

, in the first set of test apparatus


16


, the sample inlet valve


59


can be closed and the draw down valve


57


opened. With the pump inlet and outlet valves


120


,


122


aligned as shown in

FIG. 7

, the pump


53


can be operated to pump formation fluid from the annulus


33


at the first formation into the return flow passageway


36


. The return flow passageway


36


can extend through the work string


6


to the second set of test apparatus


16


at the second formation. There, the second sample inlet valve


59


can be closed and the second draw down valve


57


can be opened, just as in the first set of test apparatus


16


. However, in the second set of test apparatus


16


, the pump inlet and outlet valves


120


,


122


can be rotated clockwise a quarter turn to allow the second pump


53


to pump the first formation fluid from the return flow passageway


36


into the second formation via the second draw down valve


57


and via the annulus


33


. Variations of this process can be used to pump formation fluid from one or more formations into one or more other formations. At the lower end of the work string


6


, it may only be necessary to have a single extendable packer for isolating the lower annulus.




As shown in

FIG. 10

, it can also be useful to incorporate a formation coring device


124


into the test apparatus


16


of the present invention. The coring device


124


can be extended into the formation by equipment identical to the equipment described above for extending the piston


45


. The coring device


124


can be rotated by a turbine


126


which is activated by drilling fluid via the. central bore


7


and a turbine inlet port


128


. The outlet of the turbine


126


can be via an outlet passageway


130


and a turbine control valve


132


, which is controlled by the control system


100


. With the packers


24


,


26


extended, the coring device


124


is extended and rotated to obtain a pristine core sample of the formation. The core sample can then be withdrawn into the work string


6


, where some chemical analysis can be performed if desired, and the core sample can be preserved in its pristine state, including pristine formation fluid, for extraction upon return of the test apparatus


16


to the surface.




As shown in

FIG. 11

, the apparatus of the present invention can be modified by the use of a sliding, non-rotating, sleeve


200


to allow testing to take place while drilling or other rotation of the drill string continues. An extendable stabilizer blade


216


can be located on the side of the test tool opposite the test port, for the purpose of pushing the test port against the borehole wall, if no piston is used, or for centering of the test tool in the borehole. Upper stabilizers


220


and lower stabilizers


222


can be added on the work string


6


to separately stabilize the rotating portion of the work string.





FIG. 12

is a longitudinal section view of the embodiment of the test apparatus


16


having a sliding, non-rotating, sleeve


200


. The cylindrical non-rotating sleeve


200


is set into a recess in the outer surface of the work string


6


. The space between the non-rotating sleeve


200


and the work string is sealed by upper rotating seals


202


and lower rotating seals


204


. A plurality of other rotating seals


206


,


208


,


210


,


212


,


214


can be used to seal fluid passageways which lead from the inner bore


7


of the work string


6


to the test apparatus


16


, depending upon the particular configuration of the test apparatus used. The non-rotating sleeve


200


is shorter than the recess into which it is set, to allow the work string


6


to move axially relative to the stationary sleeve


200


, as the work string


6


advances during drilling. A spring


223


is provided between the upper end of the sleeve


200


and the upper end of the recess, to bias the sleeve


200


downwardly relative to the work string


6


.




One or more extendable stabilizer blades or ribs


216


can be provided on the non-rotating sleeve


200


, on the side opposite the test piston


45


or the test port rib


20


. The test piston


45


can be used to obtain a fluid sample or to place a formation sensor directly against the formation. Sensors and other devices for formation testing can be placed either solely on the non-rotating sleeve


200


as shown in

FIG. 12

, or on the rotating portion of the work string


6


as shown in previous Figures, or in both locations. A remotely operated rib extension valve


218


can be provided in a passageway


219


leading from the work string bore


7


to an expansion chamber


221


in which the extendable rib


216


is located. Opening of the rib extension valve


218


introduces pressurized drilling fluid into the expansion chamber


221


, thereby hydraulically forcing the extendable rib


216


to move outwardly to contact the borehole wall. Abutting shoulders or other limiting devices known in the art (not shown) can be provided on the extendable rib


216


and the non-rotating sleeve


200


, to limit the travel of the extendable rib


216


. Further, a spring or other biasing element known in the art (not shown) can be provided to return the extendable rib


216


to its stored -position upon release of the hydraulic pressure.





FIG. 13

shows an embodiment according to the present invention wherein grippers are disposed opposite a probe.

FIG. 13

is a schematic showing a drawdown test configuration wherein two extendable grippers


21


provide stabilization and counterforce for a well engaging pad element. A tool section


16


of a drill string


6


is disposed in a well borehole


4


, and pressurized drilling fluid (mud) flows through a central bore


7


of the drill string


6


toward a drill bit (not shown) and returns to the surface via the annular space (annulus) between the drill string


6


and the borehole wall


5


. A selectively extendable piston


45


disposed on the tool section


16


includes a sealing pad


44


. The pad


44


is shown engaging the borehole wall


5


at a formation reservoir


18


containing formation fluid. Extendable grippers


21


disposed on the drill string


6


engage the borehole wall


5


generally opposite the point where the pad


44


engages the wall


5


. The grippers


21


are used to anchor the tool section


16


and to provide a counterforce for ensuring a good seal between the pad


44


and wall


5


. The mud may continue to flow in the annulus while the pad


44


and grippers


21


are extended, because the pad


44


only seals the annulus at a selected point against the wall


5


. The mud is substantially free to flow around the grippers


21


and extendable piston


45


.




A port


43


positioned at the interface between the pad


44


and wall


5


provides an intermediate annulus sealed from the rest of the annulus. A passageway


312


is connected to the port


43


to provide fluid communication between the reservoir


18


and the internal components housed in the tool section


16


. A pump


53


, which may be electromechanical or mud operated, is used to lower the pressure within the passageway


312


thereby allowing formation fluid from the reservoir


18


to enter the tool


16


. A sensor such as a pressure gauge


46


is disposed in the passageway


312


, and a valve


308


between the pressure gauge


46


and pump


53


is used to close a portion of the passageway


312


to become a system or test volume


302


.




Optional sample collection chambers or tanks


56


are shown disposed in the drill string


6


and connected via sample valves


306


to the passageway


312


between a flush valve


304


and pump


53


. An exit port


310


from the drill string


6


to the annulus is provided at the passageway


312


end. The flush valve


304


is disposed within the passageway


312


between the exit port


310


and pump


53


. The valve port


304


may be opened during draw down or when the system volume


302


is flushed to the annulus.




When formation testing is desired, the pad


44


and grippers


21


are extended to engage the wall on opposite sides of the borehole


4


. The pad


44


seals against the wall and separates an intermediate annulus


33


from the main annulus. At this point, the intermediate annulus


33


and passageway


312


will have some of the drilling mud. The test valve


308


and flush valve


304


are opened, and the pump


53


, is activated to reduce the pressure in the passageway


312


. The passageway


302


pressure is reduced to a point below the formation pressure for a formation pressure test. Formation fluid from the reservoir


18


enters the passageway


312


through the port


43


, flows through the pump


53


and then out of the passageway


312


through the exit port


310


and into the main annulus. The test volume


302


should contain relatively clean fluid, i.e. formation fluid substantially. uncontaminated by drilling mud (pristine formation fluid), for most tests to yield useful results. To obtain clean formation fluid, pumping is continued until substantially all of the mud trapped in the passageway


312


and mud initially invaded into the formation is flushed and replaced with pristine formation fluid. When the passageway contains clean formation fluid, the test valve


308


and flush valve


310


are closed and pumping is ceased.




In an alternative embodiment as shown in

FIG. 15

, packers


24


and


26


could be used while the grippers


21


and pad


44


remain retracted. The packers separate the annulus into and upper annulus


32


above the upper packer


24


, a lower annulus


34


downhole of the lower packer


26


, and an intermediate annulus


33


between the upper and lower packers


24


and


26


. The intermediate annulus


33


is created where a reservoir


18


is to be tested. In this embodiment, the test volume includes the intermediate annulus


33


. All other aspects of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 15

are as described with respect to the embodiment of FIG.


13


.




Referring still to

FIG. 13

for a formation pressure test, the pressure of test volume


302


is measured with the pressure sensor


46


during the draw down described above, and after the test valve


308


is closed. Formation fluid continues to enter the test volume


302


through the port


43


after the test valve


308


is closed, because the test volume pressure is below the formation pressure immediately after the test valve


308


is closed. The formation fluid entering the test volume


302


then causes the pressure within the test volume


302


to rise until the test volume pressure equals the formation pressure. The stabilized pressure is measured by the pressure gauge


46


, and the results may be processed and stored downhole, processed and transmitted to the surface, or sent to the surface without preprocessing.




Prior to retracting the grippers


21


and pad


44


, fluid samples may be taken by leaving the flush valve


304


closed and opening the test valve and one or more sample valves


306


. The pump


53


can then be used to pump fluid into the sample tanks


56


. After testing and sampling at a particular location are complete, the test valve and flush valve are opened, the grippers and pad are retracted and drilling is resumed. The test fluid may be pumped through the system to purge the passageway


312


in preparation for subsequent tests.





FIG. 14

shows a tool section


16


of a drill string


6


including a two-way communication system


104


and power supply


106


disposed at its upper end. The communication system


104


may be comprised of any well-known components suitable for the particular application. For example, the communication system


104


may be a mud pulse telemetry system, and acoustic or electromagnetic wave propagation system for MWD applications, or it may be an electronic digital or analog telemetry system in a wireline application. Likewise, the power supply


106


may be selected from any known system such as mud-driven turbine generator, battery or surface-source power. The power supply is chosen based on application needs. A circulation valve


90


is disposed on the tool section


16


, and is typically disposed below the power supply


106


to allow continued circulation of mud to operate. This allows continued operation of the power supply


106


while drilling is stopped for sampling and testing of a formation. Shown disposed below the circulation valve


90


is an optional sample chamber section


56


. Stabilizers


20


with integrated grippers


21


are mounted on the tool section


16


below the circulation valve


90


and sample chamber section


16


. The grippers


21


are essentially identical to those described above for FIG.


13


. The grippers


21


are selectively extendable and can engage the wall of a borehole to anchor the tool section


16


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 14

, the grippers


21


are integrated into the stabilizers


20


, which are also selectively extendable. The integrated combination allows the same extension mechanism to be used to extend the grippers


21


or stabilizers


20


. This is useful in that sometimes it may be desired to stabilize the drill string


6


while continuing drilling. Thus the stabilizers are extended while the grippers


21


remain in a retracted position. When anchoring is desired, the stabilizers


20


are extended, and then the grippers


21


are extended from the already extended stabilizers


20


. The lengths of the anchoring grippers


21


are minimized in this embodiment, which creates a stronger and more stable anchoring system.




A pump


53


and at least one measurement sensor


46


such as a pressure sensor are disposed in the tool section


16


. The pump


53


and pressure sensor


46


may be the system shown in FIG.


13


and described above. A pad sealing element


44


, operatively associated with the pump


53


and pressure sensor


46


is also disposed on the tool section


16


. The pad sealing element


44


is selectively extendable by the use of a mud driven piston


45


or the like, and the pad


44


is shown integral to a stabilizer


20


to achieve the same advantages of compact design and strength as the grippers


21


and stabilizers


20


described above. The extended pad


44


engages a borehole wall to seal a portion of the wall. A port


43


located on the end of the pad


44


is in fluid communication with the pump


53


and measurement sensor


46


. One or more grippers


21


and stabilizers


20


may be disposed about the circumference of the tool section


16


to provide an opposing force so the pad element


44


remains in sealing contact with the borehole wall during testing and sampling. Disposed downhole of the tool section


16


could be a typical BHA including a drill bit (not shown) well known in the art.




During drilling operations, drilling would be momentarily stopped for tasting of a formation. A command to open the circulation valve


90


may be issued from a surface location or from a not shown controller that may be disposed in the tool section


16


. The circulation valve


90


then opens in response to the command to allow continued mud circulation through the drill string


6


and power supply


106


. The stabilizers


20


and grippers


21


are then extended to engage the borehole wall to anchor the tool section. Once the tool section


16


is anchored in place, the stabilizer


20


and pad sealing element


44


are extended to seal a portion of borehole wall such that mud flowing in the annulus between the drill string


6


and borehole wall does not enter the port


43


. The stabilizers


20


and grippers


21


located at the pad sealing element


44


are also extended to enhance the sealing of the pad by supplying a force on borehole wall generally opposite the pad


44


.




Once the pad


44


is in sealing contact with the borehole wall, the pump


53


is activated to reduce the pressure at the port


43


. Typically, mud trapped in the port should be expelled to the annulus to ensure only clean fluid in tested and sampled. A valve and exit (not shown) included on the tool section


16


may be used to expel any unwanted fluid from the system prior to testing. When the pressure is reduced at the port


43


formation fluid enters the port. If samples are desired, the fluid is directed by internal valves such as those shown in

FIG. 13

to the storage tank section


56


. Measurements of fluid characteristics, such as formation pressure, are taken with the sensor


46


. The communication system


104


is then used to transmit data representative of the sensed characteristic to the surface. The data may also be preprocessed downhole by a processor (not shown) disposed in the tool section prior to transmitting the data to the surface.





FIG. 16

shows another embodiment of a tool section


16


according to the present invention in a typical drill string


6


. The tool section


16


has a two-way communication system


104


and power supply


106


disposed at its upper end. The communication system


105


may be comprised of any well-known components suitable for the particular application. For example, the communication system may be a mud pulse telemetry system for MWD applications, or it may be an electronic digital or analog telemetry system in a wireline application. Likewise, the power supply


106


may be selected from any known system such as mud-driven turbine generator, battery or surface-source power. The power supply is also chosen based on application needs. A circulation valve


90


is disposed on the tool section


16


, and in systems using a mud turbine power supply is typically disposed below the power supply


106


to allow continued operation of the power supply


106


while drilling is stopped for sampling and testing of a formation. Shown disposed below the circulation valve


90


is an optional sample chamber section


56


. Stabilizers


20


with integrated grippers


21


are mounted on the tool section


16


below the circulation valve


90


and sample chamber section


56


. The grippers


21


are essentially identical to those described above for FIG.


13


. The grippers


21


are selectively extendable and can engage a borehole to anchor the tool section


16


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 16

, the grippers


21


are integrated into the stabilizers


20


, which are also selectively extendable. The integrated combination allows the same extension mechanism to be used to extend the grippers


21


or stabilizers


20


. This is useful, in that sometimes it may be desired to stabilize the drill string


6


while continuing drilling and at other times, it may be desirable to stop drilling and anchor the drill string


6


. The stabilizers


20


are extended while the grippers


21


remain in a retracted position for stabilization during drilling. When anchoring is desired, the stabilizers


20


are extended, and then the grippers


21


are extended from the already extended stabilizers


20


. The lengths of the anchoring grippers


21


are thus minimized creating a stronger and more stable anchoring system.




A pump


53


and at least one measurement sensor


46


such as a pressure sensor are disposed in the tool section


16


. The pump


53


and pressure sensor


46


may be the system shown in FIG.


13


and described above. Upper and lower packers


24


and


26


are disposed on the tool section above and below a pad sealing element


44


. The packers


24


and


26


may be mud-inflatable packers as described above and are used to seal a portion of annulus around the pad sealing element


44


from the rest of the annulus. The pad sealing element


44


is operatively associated with the pump


53


and pressure sensor


46


and is mounted on the tool section


16


between the upper and lower packers


24


and


26


. The pad sealing element


44


is selectively extendable by the use of a mud driven piston


45


or the like. The extended pad sealing element


44


engages a borehole wall to seal a portion of the wall between the upper and lower packers


24


and


26


. A port


43


located on the end of the pad sealing element


44


is in fluid communication with the pump


53


and measurement sensor


46


. Another port (not shown separately) positioned on the tool section


16


between the packers


24


and


26


may be used in conjunction with the pump


53


to reduce the pressure between the packers. This is done by pumping the mud trapped between the packers


24


and


26


to the annulus above the upper packer


24


. With pressure reduced between the packers below the pressure at the port


43


, a pressure differential is created between the port


43


and the annulus between the packers


24


and


26


, thereby ensuring that any leakage at the port is formation fluid leakage from the port into the annulus rather than mud from the annulus leaking into the port


43


. Another set of stabilizers


20


and grippers


21


may be positioned downhole of the lower packer


26


to provide added tool stabilization and anchoring during tests. A typical BHA including a drill bit (not shown) well known in the art, would be disposed on the drill string


6


down hole of the depicted tool section


16


.




There could be any number of variations to the above-described embodiments that do not require additional illustration. For example, alternate embodiments could be the embodiments of

FIGS. 13-16

wherein the selectively extendable pad members


44


are multiple selectively extendable pad members. Also, any embodiment with integrated grippers


21


and stabilizers


20


may be altered wherein separate grippers and stabilizers are used, or wherein grippers are used without stabilizers.




Operation




In operation, the formation tester


16


is positioned adjacent a selected formation or reservoir. Next, a hydrostatic pressure is measured utilizing the pressure sensor located within the sensor system


46


, as well as determining the drilling fluid resistivity at the formation. This is achieved by pumping fluid into the sample system


46


, and then stopping to measure the pressure and resistivity. The data is processed down hole and then stored or transmitted up-hole using the MWD telemetry system.




Next, the operator expands and sets the inflatable packers


24


,


26


. This is done by maintaining the work string


6


stationary and circulating the drilling fluid down the inner bore


7


, through the drill bit


8


and up the annulus. The valves


39


and


80


are open, and therefore, the return flow passageway


36


is open. The control valve


30


is positioned to align the high pressure passageway


27


with the inflation fluid passageways


28


A,


28


B, and drilling fluid is allowed to flow into the packers


24


,


26


. Because of the pressure drop from inside the inner bore


7


to the annulus across the drill bit


8


, there is a significant pressure differential to expand the packers


24


,


26


and provide a good seal. The higher the flow rate of the drilling fluid, the higher the pressure drop, and the higher the expansion force applied to the packers


24


,


26


. In the non-rotating sleeve embodiment, extension of the packers


24


,


26


can be used to stop and prevent rotation of the test apparatus


16


. When the packers


24


,


26


are retracted, the sleeve


200


rests on the lower end of the recess in the work string


6


. The packers


24


,


26


are activated by a hydraulic system controlled by the downhole electronics. As the work string


6


advances during drilling, the sleeve


200


remains stationary relative to the borehole, compressing the spring


223


. Thus, the sleeve


200


is essentially decoupled from the movement of the work string


6


, enabling formation test measurements to be carried out, without being influenced by the movement of the work string


6


. Therefore, there is no requirement to interrupt the drilling process.




One main application of the MWD formation tester is to collect one or several fluid samples downhole, store these and bring them to surface, either by retrieving them with a wireline or when the downhole tool is being brought to surface. The fluid samples will then be collected and one or more analyses or tests will be carried out on the fluid sample in order to determine various properties of the formation fluid. This again is helpful when performing various analyses or simulations in order, to predict the behavior of the reservoir and the reservoir fluid when this is being produced. Common analyses include so-called Pressure-Volume-Temperature analysis, or PVT analysis. A basic PVT analysis is required in order to relate surface production to underground withdrawal of hydrocarbons. Some basic parameters that are derived from a PVT analysis are determination of bubble point pressure or dew point pressure, gas-oil or gas-liquid ratio, oil formation factor and gas formation factor.




Principally, the PVT analysis can be performed by keeping one of the three parameters, P or V or T, constant, while observing the relationship of the two others. Most commonly, this is done by keeping the temperature constant at reservoir temperature, then using a positive displacement or other type of pump to make controlled changes to the sample volume, decreasing or increasing, and measuring the pressure accordingly. If this operation is carried out downhole, basic properties of the reservoir fluid may be provided without bringing the sample to surface. Other properties of interest, such as fluid density and fluid viscosity may also be measured downhole. Fluid viscosity may be determined by flowing the reservoir fluid through a tube or a flow channel, and measuring the pressure drop between two points in the tube. Alternatively, a rolling ball viscometer or other devices can be used. These tests are preferably carried out over the entire range of pressure steps from above bubble point to atmospheric pressure. Other key parameters to determine from the downhole sample are the fluid composition and gravity (density). In order to do so, downhole, it is necessary to identify the various elements of the fluid, through an optical fluid analyzer, a particle analyzer or a similar device. Such analyses usually give the mole fractions of each component up to the hexanes. The heptanes and heavier components of the reservoir fluid are grouped together and the average molecular weight and density of the latter is determined.




Some of the main drivers for performing PVT analysis of the fluid samples downhole would be safety benefits associated by not bringing a high pressure sample to surface, the ability to perform the all tests at in-situ conditions, and the benefit of being able to collect a new sample if the original sample is of questionable quality, to mention a few. Possibly, these analyses may be performed by the downhole tool after a sample has been collected and while drilling on to the next zone of interest. Therefore, the data may be available much sooner; some key parameters may even be communicated to surface while drilling or while the tool is still in hole. The data may then be used to optimize the drilling and the completion of the well. Alternatively, a basic PVT analysis is performed at the rig site or in a laboratory, hours or days after the sample was collected. Fluid composition, density and viscosity are nearly always analyzed in a laboratory.




Once the formation test is complete, the packers


24


,


26


are retracted. The spring


223


, or other biasing device known in the art, then pushes the sleeve


200


against the lower end of the recess in the work string


6


. As an alternative to extension of packers, or in addition thereto, another expandable element such as the piston


45


can be extended to contact the wall of the well borehole, by appropriate positioning of the control valve


30


. If no packers are extended, the extendable rib


216


alone can be used to hold the non-rotating sleeve


200


stationary.




The upper packer element


24


can be wider than the lower packer


26


, thereby containing more volume. Thus, the lower packer


26


will set first. This can prevent debris from being trapped between the packers


24


,


26


.




The Venturi pump


38


can then be used to prevent overpressurization in the intermediate annulus


33


, or the centrifugal pump


53


can be operated to remove the drilling fluid from the intermediate annulus


33


. This is achieved by opening the draw down valve


41


in the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, or by opening the valves


82


,


57


, and


48


in the embodiment shown in FIG.


7


.




If the fluid is pumped from the intermediate annulus


33


, the resistivity and the dielectric constant of the fluid being drained can be constantly monitored by the sensor system


46


. The data so measured can be processed down hole and transmitted up-hole via the telemetry system. The resistivity and dielectric constant of the fluid passing through will change from that of drilling fluid to that of drilling fluid filtrate, to that of the pristine formation fluid.




In order to perform the formation pressure build-up and draw down tests, the operator closes the pump inlet valve


57


and the by-pass valve


82


. This stops drainage of the intermediate annulus


33


and immediately allows the pressure to build-up to virgin formation pressure. The operator may choose to continue circulation in order to telemeter the pressure results up-hole.




In order to take a sample of formation fluid, the operator could open the chamber inlet valve


58


so that the fluid in the passageway


40


E is allowed to enter the sample chamber


56


. The sample chamber may be empty or filled with some compressible fluid. If the sample chamber


56


is empty and at atmospheric conditions, the baffle


72


will be urged downward until the chamber


56


is filled. An adjustable choke


74


is included for regulating the flow into the chamber


56


. The purpose of the adjustable choke


74


is to control the change in pressure across the packers when the sample chamber is opened. If the choke


74


were not present, the packer seal might be lost due to the sudden change in pressure created by opening the sample chamber inlet valve


58


. Another purpose of the choke


74


would be to control the process of flowing the fluid into the system, to prevent the pressure from being lowered below the fluid bubble point, thereby preventing gas from evaporating from the fluid.




Once the sample chamber


56


is filled, then the valve


58


can again be closed, allowing for another pressure build-up, which is monitored by the pressure sensor. If desired, multiple pressure build-up tests can be performed by repeatedly pumping down the intermediate annulus


33


, or by repeatedly filling additional sample chambers. Formation permeability may be calculated by later analyzing the pressure versus time data, such as by a Horner Plot which is well known in the art. Of course, in accordance with the teachings of the present invention, the data may be analyzed before the packers


24


and


26


are deflated. The sample chamber


56


could be used in order to obtain a fixed, controlled drawn down volume. The volume of fluid drawn may also be obtained from a down hole turbine meter placed in the appropriate passageway.




Once the operator is prepared to either drill ahead, or alternatively, to test another reservoir, the packers


24


,


26


can be deflated and withdrawn, thereby returning the test apparatus


16


to a standby mode. If used, the piston


45


can be withdrawn. The packers


24


,


26


can be deflated by positioning the control valve


30


to align the low pressure passageway


31


with the inflation passageway


28


. The piston


45


can be withdrawn by positioning the control valve


30


to align the low pressure passageway


31


with the cylinder passageway


29


. However, in order to totally empty the packers or the cylinder, the Venturi pump


38


or the centrifugal pump


53


can be used.




Once at the surface, the sample chamber


56


can be separated from the work string


6


. In order to drain the sample chamber, a container for holding the sample (which is still at formation pressure) is attached to the outlet of the chamber outlet valve


62


. A source of compressed air is attached to the expulsion valve


60


. Upon opening the outlet valve


62


, the internal pressure is released, but the sample is still in the sample chamber. The compressed air attached to the expulsion valve


60


pushes the baffle


72


toward the outlet valve


62


, forcing the sample out of the sample chamber


56


. The sample chamber may be cleaned by refilling with water or solvent through the outlet valve


62


, and cycling-the baffle


72


with compressed air via the expulsion valve


60


. The fluid can then be analyzed for hydrocarbon number distribution, bubble point pressure, or other properties. Alternatively, a sensor package can be associated with the sample chamber


56


, so that the same measurements can be performed on the fluid sample while it is still downhole. Then, the sample may be discharged downhole.




Once the operator decides to adjust the drilling fluid density, the method comprises the steps of measuring the hydrostatic pressure of the well borehole at the target formation. Then, the packers


24


,


26


are set so that an upper


32


, a lower


34


, and an intermediate annulus


33


are formed within the well borehole. Next, the well borehole fluid is withdrawn from the intermediate annulus


33


as has been previously described and the pressure of the formation is measured within the intermediate annulus


32


. The other embodiments of extendable elements may also be used to determine formation pressure.




The method further includes adjusting the density of the drilling fluid according to the pressure readings of the formation so that the mud weight of the drilling fluid closely matches the pressure gradient of the formation. This allows for maximum drilling efficiency. Next, the inflatable packers


24


,


26


are deflated as has been previously explained and drilling is resumed with the optimum density drilling fluid.




The operator would continue drilling to a second subterranean horizon, and at the appropriate horizon, would then take another hydrostatic pressure measurement, thereafter inflating the packers


24


,


26


and draining the intermediate annulus


33


, as previously set out. According to the pressure measurement, the density of the drilling fluid may be adjusted again and the inflatable packers


24


,


26


are unseated and the drilling of the borehole may resume at the correct overbalance weight.




The invention herein described can also be used as a near bit blow-out preventor. If an underground blow-out were to occur, the operator would set the inflatable packers


24


,


26


, and have the valve


39


in the closed position, and begin circulating the drilling fluid down the work string through the open valves


80


and


82


. Note that in a blowout prevention application, the pressure in the lower annulus


34


may be monitored by opening valves


39


and


48


and closing valves


57


,


59


,


30


,


82


, and


80


. The pressure in the upper annulus may be monitored while circulating directly to the annulus through the bypass valve by opening valve


48


. Also the pressure in the internal diameter


7


of the drill string may be monitored during normal drilling by closing both the inlet valve


39


and outlet valve


80


in the passageway


36


, and opening the by-pass valve


82


, with all other valves closed. Finally, the by-pass passageway


84


would allow the operator to circulate heavier density fluid in order to control the kick.




Alternatively, if the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6

is used, the operator would set the first and second inflatable packers


24


,


26


and then position the circulation valve


90


in the closed position. The inflatable packers


24


,


26


are set at a position that is above the influx zone so that the influx zone is isolated. The shunt valve


92


contained on the work string


6


is placed in the open position. Additives can then be added to the drilling fluid at the surface, thereby increasing the density. The heavier drilling fluid is circulated down the work string


6


, through the shunt valve


92


. Once the denser drilling fluid has replaced the lighter fluid, the inflatable packers


24


,


26


can be unseated and the circulation valve


90


is placed in the open position. Drilling may then resume.




Testing and sampling operations using the embodiments of

FIGS. 13 through 16

are substantially the same as described earlier with respect to the other embodiments. However, the method of stabilizing and anchoring the tool section requires more explanation. For any of embodiment shown in

FIGS. 13

,


14


and


16


, the tool section


16


is anchored in place within the borehole by extending the grippers


21


to engage the borehole wall. The anchored tool section is therefore less likely to move due to forces such as heave from a drilling ship or vibration from circulating drilling fluid.




The method of testing using an embodiment as shown in

FIG. 15

is especially suited for tight formations, because the method uses a larger borehole wall area for testing. Instead of extending the grippers


21


and pad sealing element,


44


as in the previous embodiments, the grippers


21


and pad sealing element


44


remain retracted during test operations. Packers


24


and


26


are extended as described above to seal an intermediate annulus


33


from an upper annulus


32


and lower annulus


34


. The port


43


is open to the intermediate annulus


33


. Drilling fluid trapped in the intermediate annulus


33


is replaced by formation fluid


18


by pumping the drilling fluid from the intermediate annulus


33


as described above. The formation fluid


18


invades the intermediate annulus


33


when the pressure of the intermediate is reduced due to the pumping operation. Pressure testing and sampling is then conducted as described above.




The foregoing description is directed to particular embodiments of the present invention for the purpose of illustration and explanation. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that many modifications and changes to the embodiment set forth above are possible without departing from the scope and the spirit of the invention. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such modifications and changes.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for testing an underground formation comprising:a) a work string disposed in a well borehole; b) at least one independently adjustable and extendable element mounted on the work string the extendable element being capable of sealing engagement with a wall of the borehole for isolating a portion of the well at the formation; c) at least one independently extendable gripper element_disposed on the work string axially spaced apart from a port, the port being selectively exposed to the isolated portion of the borehole wall, wherein the at least one extendable gripper element forcibly engages the borehole wall to anchor the work string radially, axially and circumferentially while the borehole wall is engaged by the at least one extendable gripper element; and (d) a test device for testing at least one characteristic of the formation.
  • 2. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the test device comprises:a fluid control device for controlling formation fluid flow through the port from the isolated portion of the borehole wall; and a sensor for sensing at least one characteristic of the fluid.
  • 3. The apparatus recited in claim 2, further comprising at least one sample chamber, the at least one sample chamber being in fluid flow communication with the port.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the work string is selected from the group consisting of (i) a drill string; and (ii) a wireline.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one extendable gripper element is at least two extendable gripper elements.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the extendable element is selectively extendable and selectively retractable and the at least one extendable gripper element is selectively extendable and selectively retractable.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of selectively extendable stabilizers mounted on the work string for stabilizing the work string while the work string is translating through the borehole.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the at least one gripper element is integral to at least one of the plurality of stabilizers.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a first selectively expandable packer device mounted on the work string and a second selectively expandable packer device mounted on the work string and spaced apart from the first selectively expandable packer device, the first and second expendable packer devices being expandable to contact the borehole wall in a sealing relationship to divide an annular space surrounding the work string into an upper annulus, an intermediate annulus and a lower annulus, wherein the at least one extendable element is located at the intermediate annulus.
  • 10. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein said test port is located in said extendable element.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the port is a plurality of ports.
  • 12. A method for testing an underground formation comprising:a) disposing a work string in a well borehole; b) isolating a portion of the borehole wall by extending at least one independently extendable element from the work string to sealing engagement with the wall of the borehole at the formation; c) independently extending at least one gripper element into forceful engagement with the borehole wall axially spaced apart from a port, the port being exposed to the isolated portion of the borehole wall, wherein the at least one gripper element when extended anchors the work string radially, axially and circumferentially while the borehole wall is engaged by the at least one extendable element; and d) testing at least one characteristic of the formation at the isolated portion of the borehole well with a test device.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein testing the at least one characteristic further comprises:i) flowing formation fluid through the port from the isolated portion of the borehole wall with a fluid control device; and ii) sensing at least one characteristic of the fluid with a sensor.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising collecting a sample of formation fluid by flowing fluid from the port to at least one sample chamber.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein disposing a work string in a borehole comprises a work string selected from the group consisting of (i) a drill string; and (ii) a wireline.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein extending at least one gripper element is extending at least two gripper elements.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising:i) translating the work string through the borehole; and ii) stabilizing the work string while translating the work string through the borehole by extending a plurality of stabilizers from the work string.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein extending at least one extendable gripper element is extending at least one gripper element from an extended stabilizer.
  • 19. A method of claim 12, further comprising:i) expanding a first packer device from the work string into sealing engagement with the borehole wall; and ii) expanding a second packer device from the work string into sealing engagement with the borehole wall at a location spaced apart from the first packer device, wherein expanding the first and second packer devices divides an annular space surrounding the work string into an upper annulus, an intermediate annulus and a lower annulus, and wherein exposing the port is exposing the port to the intermediate annulus.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation-in-part patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/302,888 filed on Apr. 30, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No, 6,157,893 on Dec. 5, 2000, and which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/226,865 filed on Jan. 7, 1999, and entitled “Modified Formation Testing Apparatus and Method” now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/088,208, filed on Jun. 1 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,047,239 and entitled “Improved Formation Testing Apparatus and Method”, which was a continuation-in-part patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/626,747 [U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,186], filed on Mar. 28, 1996, and entitled “Formation Isolation and Testing Apparatus and Method”, which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/414,558 filed on Mar. 31, 1995, and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Testing Wells”, now abandoned. These applications are fully. incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
4573532 Blake Mar 1986 A
4635717 Jageler Jan 1987 A
4860580 DuRocher Aug 1989 A
5233866 Desbrandes Aug 1993 A
5803186 Berger et al. Sep 1998 A
6041860 Nazzal et al. Mar 2000 A
6047239 Berger et al. Apr 2000 A
6157893 Berger et al. Dec 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO9630628 Oct 1996 WO
WO9945236 Sep 1999 WO
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/226865 Jan 1999 US
Child 09/302888 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/302888 Apr 1999 US
Child 09/703645 US
Parent 09/088208 Jun 1998 US
Child 09/226865 US
Parent 08/626747 Mar 1996 US
Child 09/088208 US
Parent 08/414558 Mar 1995 US
Child 08/626747 US