Modified polysaccharides containing amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6620295
  • Patent Number
    6,620,295
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 5, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 16, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Modified polysaccharides (such as starches, gums, chitosans, celluloses, alginates, sugars, etc.), which are commonly used in the paper industry as strengthening agents, surface sizes, coating binders, emulsifiers and adhesives, can be combined into a single molecule with amphiphilic hydrocarbons (e.g. surface active agents) which are commonly utilized in the paper industry to control absorbency, improve softness, enhance surface feel and function as dispersants. The resulting molecule is a modified polysaccharide having surface active moieties which can provide several potential benefits, depending on the specific combination employed, including: (a) strength aids that do not impart stiffness; (b) softeners that do not reduce strength; (c) wet strength with improved wet/dry strength ratio; (d) debonders with reduced linting and sloughing; (e) strength aids with controlled absorbency; and (f) surface sizing agents with improved tactile properties.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the manufacture of paper products, such as facial tissue, bath tissue, paper towels, dinner napkins and the like, a wide variety of product properties are imparted to the final product through the use of chemical additives. Examples of such additives include softeners, debonders, wet strength agents, dry strength agents, sizing agents, opacifiers and the like. In many instances, more than one chemical additive is added to the product at some point in the manufacturing process. Unfortunately, there are instances where certain chemical additives may not be compatible with each other or may be detrimental to the efficiency of the papermaking process, such as can be the case with the effect of wet end chemicals on the downstream efficiency of creping adhesives. Another limitation, which is associated with wet end chemical addition, is the limited availability of adequate bonding sites on the papermaking fibers to which the chemicals can attach themselves. Under such circumstances, more than one chemical functionality compete for the limited available bonding sites, oftentimes resulting in the insufficient retention of one or both chemicals on the fibers.




Therefore, there is a need for a means of applying more than one chemical functionality to a paper web which mitigates the limitations created by limited number of bonding sites.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In certain instances, two or more chemical functionalities can be combined into a single molecule, such that the combined molecule imparts at least two distinct product properties to the final paper product that heretofore have been imparted through the use of two or more different molecules. More specifically, modified polysaccharides (such as starches, gums, chitosans, celluloses, alginates, sugars, etc.), which are commonly used in the paper industry as strengthening agents, surface sizes, coating binders, emulsifiers and adhesives, can be combined into a single molecule with amphiphilic hydrocarbons (e.g. surface active agents) which are commonly utilized in the paper industry to control absorbency, improve softness, enhance surface feel and function as dispersants. The resulting molecule is a modified polysaccharide having surface active moieties which can provide several potential benefits, depending on the specific combination employed, including: (a) strength aids that do not impart stiffness; (b) softeners that do not reduce strength; (c) wet strength with improved wet/dry strength ratio; (d) debonders with reduced linting and sloughing; (e) strength aids with controlled absorbency; and (f) surface sizing agents with improved tactile properties.




Hence in one aspect, the invention resides in a modified polysaccharide containing one or more amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties, said modified polysaccharide having the following structure:






Polysac-Z


3


R


1










or








—Polysac—Z


3


R


1


—Polysac—






where




Polysac=any polysaccharide, monosaccharide, or sugar residue, modified or unmodified;




Z


3


=—CH


2


, —COO—, —OOC—, —CONH—, —NHCO—, —O—, —S—, —OSO


2


O—, —OCOO—, —NHCOO—,




—OOCNH, —NHCONH—, —CONCO—, or any other radical capable of bridging the R


1


group to the polysaccharide backbone portion of the molecule; and




R


1


=any organofunctional group with the only limitation being that R


1


must contain a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with our without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, and having a carbon chain length of 4 or greater.




In another aspect, the invention resides in a paper sheet, such as a tissue or towel sheet, comprising a modified polysaccharide containing one or more amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties, said modified polysaccharide having the following structure:






Polysac—Z


3


R


1










or








—Polysac—Z


3


R


1


—Polysac—






where




Polysac=any polysaccharide, monosaccharide, or sugar residue, modified or unmodified;




Z


3


=—CH


2


, —COO—, —OOC—, —CONH—, —NHCO—, —O—, —S—, —OSO


2


O—, —OCOO—, —NHCOO—, —OOCNH, —NHCONH—, —CONCO—, or any other radical capable of bridging the R


1


group to the polysaccharide backbone portion of the molecule; and




R


1


=any organofunctional group with the only limitation being that R


1


must contain a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with our without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, and having a carbon chain length of 4 or greater.




In another aspect, the invention resides in a method of making a paper sheet, such as a tissue or towel sheet, comprising the steps of: (a) forming an aqueous suspension of papermaking fibers; (b) depositing the aqueous suspension of papermaking fibers onto a forming fabric to form a web; and (c) dewatering and drying the web to form a paper sheet, wherein a modified polysaccharide is added to the aqueous suspension, said modified polysaccharide having the following structure:






Polysac—Z


3


R


1










or








—Polysac—Z


3


R


1


—Polysac—






where




Polysac=any polysaccharide, monosaccharide, or sugar residue, modified or unmodified;




Z


3


=—CH


2


, —COO—, —OOC—, —CONH—, —NHCO—, —O—, —S—, —OSO


2


O—, —OCOO—, —NHCOO—, —OOCNH, —NHCONH—, —CONCO—, or any other radical capable of bridging the R


1


group to the polysaccharide backbone portion of the molecule; and




R


1


=any organofunctional group with the only limitation being that R


1


must contain a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with our without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, and having a carbon chain length of 4 or greater.




The amount of the modified polysaccharide added to the fibers can be from about 0.02 to about 2 weight percent, on a dry fiber basis, more specifically from about 0.05 to about 1 weight percent, and still more specifically from about 0.1 to about 0.75 weight percent. The modified polysaccharide can be added to the fibers at any point in the papermaking process. A preferred addition point is where the fibers are suspended in water. However, modified polysaccharides can also be added topically to a dried paper web.




As used herein, polysaccharides are carbohydrates that can be hydrolyzed to many monosaccharides and include, but are not limited to, starches (primarily modified starches from potato, corn, waxy maize, tapioca and wheat) which can be unmodified, acid modified, enzyme modified, cationic, anionic or amphoteric; carboxymethylcellulose, modified or unmodified; natural gums, modified or unmodified (such as from locust bean and guar); sugars, modified or unmodified; chitosan, modified or unmodified; and dextrins, modified and unmodified. “Monosaccharide” is a carbohydrate that cannot be hydrolyzed into simpler compounds. “Carbohydrates” are polyhydroxy aldehydes, polyhydroxy ketones or compounds that can be hydrolyzed to them.




As used herein, amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties are organic compounds including alkanes, alkenes, alkynes and cyclic aliphatics which contain surface active agents. The amphiphilic hydrocarbons can be linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted.




Methods of making paper products which can benefit from the various aspects of this invention are well known to those skilled in the papermaking art. Exemplary patents include U.S. Pat. No. 5,785,813 issued Jul. 28, 1998 to Smith et al. entitled “Method of Treating a Papermaking Furnish For Making Soft Tissue”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,845 issued Jun. 30, 1998 to Farrington, Jr. et al. entitled “Soft Tissue”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,887 issued May 5, 1998 to Wendt et al. entitled “Method of Making Soft Tissue Products”; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,306 issued Jan. 7, 1997 to Kaun entitled “Method For Making Soft Tissue Using Cationic Silicones”, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

shows a macroscopic structure of amphiphilic moieties attached in pendant fashion to a polysaccharide.





FIG. 2

shows a macroscopic structure of amphiphilic moieties attached in series to a polysaccharide molecule.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




To further describe the invention, examples of the synthesis of some of the various chemical species are given below.




Polysaccharides




Starches




Unmodified starch has the structure as shown below. Unmodified starches can differ in properties such as amylopectin: amylose ratio, granule dimension, gelatinization temperature, and molecular weight. Unmodified starches have very little affinity for fibers, and modifications are widely done to extend the number of wet end starch additives available for use. Modifications to starches generally fall under one of the following categories: 1) Physical modifications, 2) Fractionation into amylose and amylopectin components, 3) Thermomechanical conversion, 4) Acid hydrolysis, 5) Chemical modifications, 6) Oxidation, 7) Derivatization and 8) Enzyme conversion.











Starch derivatives are the most common type of dry strength additive used in the paper industry. The 1990 edition of the TAPPI publication “Commercially Available Chemical Agents for Paper and Paperboard Manufacture” lists 27 different starch dry strength products. Starch chemistry primarily centers on reactions with the hydroxyl groups and the glucosidic (C—O—C) linkages. Hydroxyl groups being subject to standard substitution reactions and the glucosidic linkages being subject to cleavage. In theory the primary alcohol at the C-6 position should be more reactive than the secondary alcohols at the C-2 and C-3 positions. Also, it has been found that the tuber starches are more reactive than the cereal starches.




A large variety of starch esters and ethers have been described. Few have been actively marketed due to non-specific properties resulting from the substitution groups. Esters will generally be prepared via reaction of the acid chloride or anhydride with the starch. Hydrophobic type structures can be introduced with this functionalization and such structures have found applications in the paper industry as adhesives, and grease resistant paper size coatings. (Starch Conversion Technology, 1985)




Cationic starches are recognized as the choice for wet end additives due to their substantivity with cellulose fibers. The cationization of starches is accomplished by reaction with various tertiary and quaternary amine reagents. In general, a reactive chloride or epoxy group on one end of the reagent reacts with a starch hydroxyl group. The cationic portion of the amine then ionizes in the presence of water to form the positively charged derivative which is substantive to fiber. Quaternary ammonium derivatives are most commonly used in the paper.




Other ionic charged starches are produced by reaction of starch with amino, imino, ammonium, sulfonium, or phosphonium groups, all of which carry an ionic charge. The key factor in their usefulness is their affinity for negatively charged substrates such as cellulose. These ionic starches have found widespread use in the paper industry as wet end additives, surface sizing agents and coating binders. Cationic starches improve sheet strength by promoting ionic bonding and additional hydrogen bonding within the cellulose fibers. Some common reagents used to prepare cationic starches include: 2-diethylaminoethyl chloride (DEC); 2-dimethylaminoethyl chloride; 2-diisopropylaminoethyl chloride; 2-diethylaminoethyl bromide; 2-dimethylaminoisopropyl chloride; N-alkyl N-(2-haloethyl)-aminomethylphosphonic acids; and 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride.




Epichlorohydrin reacts with tertiary amines or their salts in water or nonaqueous solvents to form the quaternary ammonium reagents. Trimethylamine, dimethylbenzyl amine, triethylamine, N-ethyl and N-methyl morpholine, dimethylcyclohexylamine, and dimethyldodecylamine (Paschall, E.F., U.S. Pat. No. 2,876,217, 1959 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,995,513, 1961) have been used.




Cyanamide and dialkyl cyanamides can be used to attach imino carbamate groups on starches. These groups show cationic activity upon treatment with acids. The acidified products are stable to hydrolysis. Cationic cyanamide starches show useful properties as textile sizes and dry strength additives in paper. (Chamberlain, R. J., U.S. Pat. No. 3,438,970, 1969)




Aminoethylated starches are produced by treatment of ethyleneimine with starch in organic solvents or dry. Acidified products are useful as wet end paper additives (Hamerstrand, et al, “An evaluation of cationic aminoethyl cereal flours as wet end paper additives” Tappi, 58, 112, 1975). Starches react with isatoic anhydride and its derivatives to form anthranilate esters with primary or secondary amino groups (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,449,886; 3,511,830; 3,513,156; 3,620,913). Products with primary amino anthranilate groups can be derivatized and used to improve wet rub resistance in paper coatings.




Cationic starches containing anionic xanthate groups provided both wet strength and dry strength to paper when used as wet end additives in unbleached kraft pulp systems. (Powers, et al, U.S. Pat. No. #3,649,624, 1972). In this system it is believed that the permanent wet strength results from covalent bonding from the xanthate side chain reactions. (Cheng, W. C., et al, Die Starke, 30, 280, 1978) Cationic dialdehyde starches are useful wet end additives for providing temporary wet strength to paper. They are produced by periodic acid oxidation of tertiary amino or quatemary ammonium starches, by treating dialdehyde starch with hydrazine or hydrazide compounds containing tertiary amino or quaternary ammonium groups, and several other reactions.




Graft copolymers of starch are widely known. Some graft copolymers made with starches include: vinyl alcohol; vinyl acetate; methyl methacrylate; acrylonitrile; styrene; acrylamide; acrylic acid; methacrylic acid; and cationic monomers with amino substituents including: 2-hydroxy-3-methacrylopropyltrimethylammonium chloride (HMAC); N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, nitric acid salt (DMAEMA*HNO


3


); N-t-butylaminoethyl methacrylate, nitric acid salt (TBAEMA*HNO


3


); andN, N,N-trimethylaminoethyl methacrylate methyl sulfate (TMAEMA*MS).




Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/starch graft copolymers are well known in the art. Treatment of the PAN/starch graft copolymers with NaOH or KOH converts the nitrile substituents to a mixture of carboxamide and alkali metal carboxylate. Such hydrolyzed starch-g-PAN polymers (HSPAN) are used as thickening agents and as water absorbents. Important applications for HSPAN include use in disposable soft goods designed to absorb bodily fluids. (Lindsay, W. F., Absorbent Starch Based Copolymers—Their Characteristics and Applications, Formed Fabrics Industry, 8(5), 20, 1977).




Copolymers with water-soluble grafts are also well known. Many of the water soluble graft copolymers are used for flocculation and flotation of suspended solids in the paper, mining, oil drilling and other industries. (Burr, R. C., et al, “Starch Graft Copolymers for Water Treatment”,


Die Starke


, 27, 155, 1975). Graft copolymers from the cationic amine containing monomers are effective retention aids in the manufacture of filled papers. Starch-g-poly(acrylamide-co-TMAEMA*MS) was found to improve drainage rates while increasing dry tensile strength of unfilled paper handsheets. (Heath, H. D., et al, “Flocculating agent-starch blends for interfiber bonding and filler retention, comparative performance with cationic starches”, TAPPI, 57(11), 109, 1974.)




Thermoplastic-g-starch materials are also known, primarily with acrylate esters, methacrylate esters and styrene. Primary interest for these materials is in preparation of biodegradable plastics. No use of these materials as a paper additive has been found.




Other miscellaneous graft copolymers are known. Saponified starch-g-poly(vinyl acetate) has been patented as a sizing agent for cotton, rayon and polyester yarns. (Prokofeva, et al, Russian patent 451731, 1975). Graft copolymers have been saponified to convert starch-g-poly(vinyl acetate) copolymers into starch-g-poly(vinyl acetate) copolymers. As with the thermoplastic-g-starch copolymers most of these materials have been evaluated as polymeric materials in their own right and not as additives for paper.




Carboxymethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, alginate, and animal glues are superior film formers. These materials are typically applied via surface application and not added in the wet end of the process to improve dry strength. The products are relatively expensive and although they can be used alone they are typically employed in conjunction with starches or other materials.




Gums:




Gums and mucilages use in papermaking dates back to ancient China. These mucilages were obtained from various plant roots and stems and were used primarily as deflocculating and suspending agents for the long fibered pulps. As papermaking evolved other advantages of using these materials became obvious including the ability of these materials to hold the wet fiber mat together during the drying process. As papermaking evolved to using shorter and shorter fibers these gums found increased use as a means of obtaining paper strength. Since World War II the use of gums in papermaking has increased substantially.




Water soluble, polysaccharide gums are highly hydrophilic polymers having chemical structures similar to cellulose. The main chain consists of β-1,4 linked mannose sugar units with occurrence of α-1,6 linked galactose side chains. Their similarity to cellulose means they are capable of extensive hydrogen bonding with fiber surfaces. Further enhancement of dry strength occurs due to the linear nature of the molecules.




They are vegetable gums and include as examples 1) locust bean gum, 2) guar gum, 3) tamarind gum, and 4) karaya, okra and others. Locust bean gum and guar gum are the most commonly used. They have been used in the paper industry since just prior to WWII. Since the natural materials are non-ionic they are not retained on fibers to any great extent. All successful commercial products have cationic groups attached to the main chain which increases the retention of the gums on the fiber surfaces. Typical addition rates for these materials are on the order of 0.1-0.35%.




The dry strength improvement of paper furnishes through use of polysaccharide gums is derived from the linear nature of the polymer and through hydrogen bonding of the hydroxyl hydrogen of the polymer with similar functional groups on the surface of the cellulosic fibers.




The most effective gums are quaternary ammonium chloride derivatives containing a cationic charge. The cationic functionality will help the gum retain better to the fibers as well as reducing the usually higher negative zeta potential of the paper furnish, especially when fillers and fines are present in the white water. This change in zeta potential leads to a more thorough agglomeration of the fines in the system by forming more cohesive flocs. These in turn are trapped by longer fibers filling the voids among the larger fibers with additional material that helps in the inter fiber bonding of the wet web, which in turn leads to dry strength improvement.




Although a variety of guar gum derivatives have been prepared, there are only three dervivatizations which have achieved commercial significance. These are 1) Quaternization, 2) Carboxymethylation and 3) Hydroxypropylation. The structure of guar gum and derivatives is shown below.











Chitosan:




Chitosan is a high molecular weight linear carbohydrate composed of β-1,4-linked 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose units. It is prepared from the hydrolysis of the N-acetyl derivative called chitin. Chitin is isolated in commercial quantities from the shells of crustaceans. Chitin is insoluble in most common solvents, however, chitosan is soluble in acidified water due to the presence of basic amino groups. Depending on the source and degree of deacetylation chitosans can vary in molecular weight and in free amine content. In sufficiently acidic environments the amino groups become protonated and chitosan behaves as a cationic polyelectrolyte. It has been reported that chitosans increase the dry strength of paper more effectively than other common papermaking additives including the polyethylenimines and polyacrylamides.




Chitosan and starch are both polymers of D-glucose but differ in two aspects. First, chitosan has an amino group on each glucose unit and therefore has a stronger cationic character than cationic starch. Secondly, starch differs in its molecular. configuration. Starch contains amylopectin which has a three dimensional molecular structure and amylose, which has linear macromolecules. The glucose molecules of starch have an α-configuration which gives the molecules a helical form. Chitosan resembles cellulose and xylans in that it has β-linked D-monosaccharide units and tends to have straight molecular chains. The functionally reactive groups of a straight polymer molecule are more easily accessible than those of a branched, random configuration molecule and are expected to interact more effectively with the polar groups on cellulose. The structure of chitosan is shown below.











Sugars




Also included in the saccharides are the simple sugars. These include the hexoses shown below. These compounds actually exist in the cyclic acetal form as shown below for glucose. Derivatives of these sugars are included within this definition.




Such derivatives include but are not limited to things such as gluconic acid, mucic acid, mannitol, sorbitol, etc. The derivatives generally do not exist in cyclic form.











Amphiphilic Hydrocarbon Moieties




Amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties are a group of surface active agents (surfactants) capable of modifying the interface between phases. Surfactants are widely used by the industry for cleaning (detergency), solubilizing, dispersing, suspending, emulsifying, wetting and foam control. In the papermaking industry, they are often used for deinking, dispersing and foam control. They have an amphiphilic molecular structure: containing at least one hydrophilic (polar) region and at least one lipophilic (non-polar, hydrophobic) region within the same molecule. When placed in a given interface, the hydrophilic end leans toward the polar phase while the lipophilic end orients itself toward the non polar phase.











The hydrophilic end can be added to a hydrophobe synthetically to create the amphiphilic molecular structure. The following is a schematic pathway for making a variety of surfactants:











Based on the charge, surfactants can be grouped as amphoteric, anionic, cationic and nonionic.




First with regard to the amphoteric surfactants, the charges on the hydrophilic end change with the environmental pH: positive in acidic pH, negative at high pH and become zwitterions at the imtermediate pH. Surfactants included in this category include alkylamido alkyl amines and alkyl substituted amino acids.




Structure commonly shared by alkylamido alkyl amines:











where




R


0


=a C


4


or higher alkyl or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted.




n≧2




R


1


=hydroxy or carboxy ended alkyl or hydroxyalkyl groups, C chain≧2C, with or without ethoxylation, propoxylation or other substitution.




Z=H or other cationic counterion.




Structure shared commonly by alkyl substituted amino acids:






R


1


—NR′


2


Z






where




R


1


=alkyl or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, C chain≧4C,




n≧2,




Z=H or other cationic counterion




R′=carboxylic end of the amino acid.




With regard to the anionics, the hydrophilic end of the surfactant molecule is negatively charge. Anionics consist of five major chemical structures: acylated amino acids/acyl peptides, carboxylic acids and salts, sulfonic acid derivatives, sulfuric acid derivatives and phosphoric acid derivatives.




Structure commonly shared by acylated amino acids and acyl peptides:






R


0


OCO—R


1


—COOZ








or








HOOC—R


1


—COOZ






where




R


0


=alkyl or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, C chain≧4C,




R


1


=alkyl substituted amino acid moiety; or —NH—CHX—CO)


n


—NH—CHX—




where n≧1, X=amino acid sidechain; or alkyl—NHCOR′ where R′=aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, C chain≧4C




Z=H or other cationic counterion




Structure commonly shared by carboxylic acid and salts:






R—COOZ






where:




R=alkyl or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, C chain≧4C.




Z=H or other cationic counterion




Structure commonly shared by sulfonic acid derivatives:






RCO—NR


1


—(CH


2


)


n


—SO


3


Z








or








alkyl aryl-SO


3


Z








or








R—SO


3


Z








or








ROOC—(CH


2


)


n


—CH SO


3


—COOZ








or








[RCO—NH—(OCH


2


)


n


—OOC—CH SO


3


—COO]2Z








or








R(OCH


2


CH


2


)


n


—SO


3


Z






where




R=alkyl or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with or without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, C chain≧4C;




R


1


=alkyl or hydroxy alkyl, C chain≧1C;




n≧1;




Z=H or other counterion.




Structure commonly shared by sulfuric acid derivatives:






R—OSO


3


Z






where




R=aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with or without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, C chain≧4C




Z=H or other counterion.




Structure commonly shared by phosphoric acid derivatives:






R—OPO


3


Z






where




R=aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with or without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, C chain≧4C




Z=H or other counterion.




With regard to the cationics, these are surfactants with a positively charged nitrogen atom on the hydrophobic end. The charge may be permanent and non pH dependent (such as quaternary ammonium compounds) or pH dependent (such as cationic amines). They include alkyl substituted ammonium salts, heterocyclic ammonium salts, alkyl substituted imidazolinium salts and alkyl amines.




Structure commonly shared by this group:






N


+


R


4


Z











where:




R=H, alkyl, hydroxyalkyl, ethoxylated and/or propoxylation alkyl, benzyl, or aliphatic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with or without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without carboxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, C chain≧4C




Z=H or other counterion.




With regard to the nonionics, in this group the molecule has no charge. The hydrophilic end often contains a polyether (polyoxyethylene) or one or more hydroxyl groups. They generally include alcohols, alkylphenols, esters, ethers, amine oxides, alkylamines, alkylamides, polyalkylene oxide block copolymers.




Modified polysaccharides Containing Amphiphilic Hydrocarbons




Two primary methods are envisioned for incorporating amphiphilic moieties into the polysaccharide based materials. In the first scheme the amphiphilic moieties are added via reaction between a functional group on the polysaccharide and a second functional group attached to the reagent containing the amphiphilic moiety. The polysaccharides may be derivatized or non-derivatized, cationic or non-cationic. The general reaction scheme is defined as follows:






Polysac—Z


1


+Z


2


—R


1


→Polysac—Z


3


R


1








where:




Z


1


=functional group attached to the polysaccharide molecule and may be present either from the natural state or from a derivatization process. Examples of Z


1


functional groups include but are not limited to —H, —NH


2


, COOH, —CH


2


X (X=halogen), —CN, —CHO, —CS


2


.




Z


2


=Functional group attached to the R


1


moiety whose purpose is to react with a Z


1


functional group thereby attaching the R


1


moiety covalently to the polysaccharide.




Z


3


=Bridging ligand formed as a result of reaction of Z


1


with Z


2


.




R


1


=any organofunctional group with the only limitation being that R


1


must contain a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with our without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, C chain≧4 carbons.




Such materials in general will have a macroscopic structure as shown in

FIG. 1

where the amphiphilic moieties are attached in a pendant fashion to the polysaccharide. Where decreased water solubility becomes an issue a second moiety, containing only a hydrophyllic portion may be attached to the polysaccharide. Examples of such materials would include ethylene glycol and its oligomers and polymers.




In theory the Z


2


—R


1


reactant could be difunctional of the form Z


2


—R


2


—Z


2


, however, in the case of high molecular weight polysaccharides this crosslinking could lead to water insoluble products, suitable for coatings but not useful for wet end applications.




Synthesis of modified polysaccharides similar to those in

FIG. 1

could be prepared via a number of methods. Attachment of the amphiphilic hydrocarbon moiety could be achieved via the following paths:




(1) Modified cationic polysaccharides prepared via reaction with one of the following or similar reagents:











Where R


1


, R


2


, R


3


are any alkyl groups, chosen such that at least one of R


1


, R


2


, or R


3


is an amphiphilic hydrocarbon, normal or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, with or without esterification, with or without etherification, with our without sulfonation, with or without hydroxylation, with or without ethoxylation or propoxylation, C chain≧4 carbons.




(2) Dialdehyde polysaccharides, particularly dialdehyde starches, cationic or non-cationic, modified with fatty acid groups via reaction of the aldehyde groups with alcohols, amines, sulfinic acids, sulfyhydryl compounds and the like containing a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or non-substituted C


8


or higher aliphatic hydrocarbon moiety.




Ethoxylated fatty acid derivatives of the form:






HO—CH


2


CH


2


O)


n


R


6








where R


6


is an organofunctional radical containing a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or non-substituted C


8


or higher aliphatic hydrocarbon moiety, can be used to directly incorporate amphiphilic functionality onto the polysaccharide backbone as shown below.











(3) Direct reaction of a functionalized linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or non-substituted amphiphilic hydrocarbon moiety with the hydroxyl or amine groups on the polysaccharide. An example of such a reaction is shown below for chitosan:











(4) Graft polymerization of hydrophobic and or hydrophilic units onto the polysaccharide backbone. Modified vinyl monomers are capable of being grafted onto polysaccharide backbones as has been demonstrated for various starches. Use of modified vinyl monomers such as:











where:




R


2


=H, C


1-4


alkyl.




R


4


=Z


2


—R6 where:




Z


2


=Ar, CH


2


, COO—, CONH—, —O—, —S—, OSO


2


O—, —CONHCO—, —CONHCHOHCHOO—, any radical capable of bridging the R


6


group to the vinyl backbone portion of the molecule.




R6=any aliphatic, linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or non-substituted amphiphilic hydrocarbon.




In the second scheme the amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties are added via reaction between a functional group on the polysaccharide and a second functional group attached to the reagent containing the amphiphilic hydrocarbon moiety, however in this case two functional groups are attached to amphiphilic hydrocarbon containing reagent. The polysaccharides may be derivatized or non-derivatized, cationic or non-cationic. The general reaction scheme is defined as follows:






Polysac'Z


1


+Z


2


—R


1


—Z


2


→—Polysac—Z


3


R


1


—Polysac—






where:




Z


1


=functional group attached to the polysaccharide molecule and may be present either from the natural state or from a derivatization process. Examples of Z


1


functional groups include but is not limited to —OH, —NH2, —COOH, —CH


2


X (X=halogen), —CN, —CHO, —CS


2


.




Z


2


=Functional group attached to the R


1


moiety whose purpose is to react with a Z


1


functional group thereby attaching the R


1


moiety covalently to the polysaccharide.




R


1


=any organofunctional group with the only limitation being that R


1


must contain a moiety consisting of a saturated or unsaturated, substituted or unsubstituted, linear or branched amphiphilic hydrocarbon.




Such materials in general will have a macroscopic structure as shown in FIG.


2


.




In theory the polysaccharides could be of high molecular weight, however, the crosslinking would be expected to lead to water insoluble products, suitable perhaps for coatings but not useful for wet end applications. For wet end applications, lower molecular weight polysaccharides including the oligomers as well as the monosaccharides are better candidates for this approach.




Synthesis of modified polysaccharides similar to those in

FIG. 2

could be prepared via a number of methods. A few specific examples follow:




1) Reaction with diacids or diacid halides of the formula:











where:




Z=OH, halogen, other displaceable group.




Y=any residue chosen such that Y contains an amphiphilic moiety.




The displaceable groups on the reactants can react with either primary —OH or —NH2 groups on the saccharide to form the corresponding ester or amide.




2) Reaction between dialdehyde polysaccharides, cationic or non-cationic and residues chosen from the group of difunctional amphiphilic hydrocarbons where these residues are incorporated into the polysaccharide via reaction with the aldehyde groups on the starch. An example is shown below.











It will be appreciated that the foregoing examples, given for purposes of illustration, shall not be construed as limiting the scope of this invention, which is defined by the following claims and all equivalents thereto.



Claims
  • 1. A method of making a paper sheet comprising the steps of: (a) forming an aqueous suspension of papermaking fibers; (b) depositing the aqueous suspension of papermaking fibers onto a forming fabric to form a web; and (c) dewatering and drying the web to form a paper sheet, wherein a modified polysaccharide is added to the aqueous suspension, said modified polysaccharide having the following structure:—Polysac—Z3R1—Polysac—wherePolysac=a polysaccharide, monosaccharide or sugar residue; Z3=a bridging radical which serves to attach the R1 group to the Polysac residue; and R1=an organofunctional group containing a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon having a carbon chain length of 4 or greater.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the bridging radical is selected from the group consisting of —CH2, —COO—, —OOC—, —CONH—, —NHCO—, —O—, —S—, —OSO2O—, —OCOO—, —NHCOO—, —OOCNH, —NHCONH— and —CONCO—.
  • 3. A paper sheet comprising a modified polysaccharide containing one or more amphiphilic hydrocarbon moieties, said modified polysaccharide having the following structure:—Polysac—Z3R1—Polysac—wherePolysac=a polysaccharide, monosaccharide or sugar residue; Z3=a bridging radical which serves to attach the R1 group to the Polysac residue; and R1=an organofunctional group containing a moiety consisting of an amphiphilic hydrocarbon having a carbon chain length of 4 or greater.
  • 4. The paper sheet of claim 3 wherein the bridging radical is selected from the group consisting of —CH2, —COO—, —OOC—, —CONH—, —NHCO—, —O—, —S—, —OSO2O—, —OCOO—, —NHCOO—, —OOCNH, —NHCONH— and —CONCO—.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/488,429,now U.S. Pat. No. 6,517,678, titled “Modified Polysaccharides Containing Amphiphilic Hydrocarbon Moieties” filed on Jan. 20, 2000, which application claims priority from U.S. Ser. No. 60/117,085 entitled “Modified Polysaccharides Containing Amphiphilic Hydrocarbon Moieties” filed on Jan. 25, 1999, now abandoned. The entirety of U.S. Ser. No. 09/488,429 is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (81)
Number Name Date Kind
2661349 Caldwell et al. Dec 1953 A
2876217 Paschall Mar 1959 A
2926116 Keim Feb 1960 A
2926154 Keim Feb 1960 A
2995513 Paschall et al. Aug 1961 A
3128311 Shirley et al. Apr 1964 A
3152998 Moss Oct 1964 A
3155728 Lesesne Nov 1964 A
3236792 Curtis Feb 1966 A
3236895 Lee et al. Feb 1966 A
3240721 Fordyce Mar 1966 A
3250664 Conte et al. May 1966 A
3347926 Zech Oct 1967 A
3434984 Hyland, Jr. Mar 1969 A
3436359 Hubin et al. Apr 1969 A
3438970 Chamberlain et al. Apr 1969 A
3449886 Connelly et al. Jun 1969 A
3511830 Speakman May 1970 A
3513156 Speakman May 1970 A
3609126 Asao et al. Sep 1971 A
3620913 Parmerter Nov 1971 A
3649624 Powers et al. Mar 1972 A
3654370 Yeakey Apr 1972 A
3770472 Jarowenko Nov 1973 A
3793279 Lipowski Feb 1974 A
3893885 Ziemann et al. Jul 1975 A
3940519 Helmer et al. Feb 1976 A
4014933 Boettger et al. Mar 1977 A
4066495 Voigt et al. Jan 1978 A
4153581 Habermann May 1979 A
RE30193 O'Shaughnessy Jan 1980 E
4267059 Behn et al. May 1981 A
4278573 Tessler Jul 1981 A
4447498 Fink et al. May 1984 A
4450045 Hertel et al. May 1984 A
4501640 Soerens Feb 1985 A
4521490 Pocius et al. Jun 1985 A
4741804 Solarek et al. May 1988 A
4764418 Kuenn et al. Aug 1988 A
4766245 Larkin et al. Aug 1988 A
4788243 Soerens Nov 1988 A
4801699 Jobe et al. Jan 1989 A
4824689 Kuenn et al. Apr 1989 A
4866151 Tsai et al. Sep 1989 A
4959125 Spendel Sep 1990 A
4973680 Billmers Nov 1990 A
4983748 Tsai et al. Jan 1991 A
5174927 Honsa Dec 1992 A
5354425 Mackey et al. Oct 1994 A
5518585 Huth et al. May 1996 A
5525345 Warner et al. Jun 1996 A
5552020 Smith et al. Sep 1996 A
5575891 Trokhan et al. Nov 1996 A
5578678 Hartmann et al. Nov 1996 A
5591306 Kaun Jan 1997 A
5612443 Martino et al. Mar 1997 A
5624532 Trokhan et al. Apr 1997 A
5626719 Tansley et al. May 1997 A
5656746 Smith et al. Aug 1997 A
5716692 Warner et al. Feb 1998 A
5746887 Wendt et al. May 1998 A
5770711 Greene et al. Jun 1998 A
5772845 Farrington, Jr. et al. Jun 1998 A
5785813 Smith et al. Jul 1998 A
5856299 Righetto et al. Jan 1999 A
5958187 Bhat et al. Sep 1999 A
6059928 Van Luu et al. May 2000 A
6090242 Drummond et al. Jul 2000 A
6126784 Ficke et al. Oct 2000 A
6153053 Harper et al. Nov 2000 A
6190678 Hasenoehrl et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193843 Tsai et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204254 Nelson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207012 Oriaran et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207013 Oriaran et al. Mar 2001 B1
6235155 Schroeder et al. May 2001 B1
6398911 Schroeder et al. Jun 2002 B1
6465602 Schroeder et al. Oct 2002 B2
6517678 Shannon et al. Feb 2003 B1
20020053412 Schroeder et al. May 2002 A1
20020074098 Schroeder et al. Jun 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
2296826 Jul 2000 CA
2296891 Jul 2000 CA
2296894 Jul 2000 CA
2 247 943 Apr 1973 DE
0 469 891 Feb 1992 EP
0 620 315 Oct 1994 EP
0 761 691 Mar 1997 EP
WO 9912977 Mar 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Derwent World Patent Database abstract of SU 451,731: Description of Vladimir Synth Resi, “Cyanoethylated Starch Adhesive for Electroluminescent Lamps.”
Burr, R.C. et al., “Starch Graft Copolymers for Water Treatment,” Die Starke, 27, Nr. 5, 1975, pp. 155-159.
Cheng, W.C., et al., “O-Carboxymethylstarch Amine Polyampholytes as Papermaking Additives,” Starch/Stärke, vol. 30, No. 8, Aug. 1978, pp. 280-282.
Farewell, John, Editor, Commerically Available Chemical Agents for Paper and Paperboard Manufacture, Fourth Editionm, Tappi Press, 1990, pp. 5-6.
Hamerstrand, G.E., et al., “An Evaluation of Cationic Aminoethyl Cereal Flours as Wet-End Paper Additives,” Tappi, vol. 58, No. 1, Jan. 1975, pp. 112-115.
Heath, H.D., et al., “Flocculating Agent-Starch Blends for Interfiber Bonding and Filler Retention: Comparative Performance With Cationic Starches,” Tappi, vol. 57, No. 11, Nov. 1974, pp. 109-111.
Lindsay, William F., “Absorbent Starch Based Co-polymers—Their Characteristics and Applications,” Formed Fabrics Industry, 8(5), 1977, pp. 20, 24, 26.
Van Beynum, G.M.A., editor, Starch Conversion Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1985, pp. 92-93.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/117085 Jan 1999 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/488429 Jan 2000 US
Child 10/236990 US